Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- This article is an analysis of the evaluation Evaluation is a complex, inevitable process and
and accreditation of studies programs at the university represents a positive force when it relates to progress. One
level. Important lines of educational and institutional of the most important uses is to identify weak points and
development are discussed. Due to the nature of the strengths; As well as to tend towards an organizational
concepts, evaluation and accreditation, a series of improvement, that benefits both the institution and each one
sensations and actions are generated that hinder the of its members (Stufflebeam and Shinkfield,1995). The
achievement of the primordial objective of these same can be considered for accreditation processes.
processes which is the search for the joint improvement. However, this reality is not considered when we need
The human mind reads and appropriates the process as commitment and loyalty to the institution of belonging.
a judge, rather than as an opportunity for
improvement. Improving means optimizing resources, The human mind reads and appropriates these
enriching results, diminishing physical and mental wear processes as prosecutors, rather than as an opportunity to
and tear of human capital, increasing creativity, and improve their individual and collective processes.
other elements that favor the dynamics of human Improving means optimizing resources, enriching results,
activities and generate administratively healthy reducing physical and mental wear and tear of human
processes. Therefore, seeking evaluation and capital, increasing creativity, among many other elements
accreditation are important mechanisms for capacity that favor the dynamics of human activities and They make
building, development planning and improvement of these processes administratively healthy.
academic processes; But there is still a lack of
awareness, ethics, loyalty, transparency, teamwork, This article, it is an analysis of the evaluation and
and, above all, positive leadership that work individual accreditation of studies programs at the university level.
and collective improvement. Important lines of educational and institutional
development are discussed.
Keywords:- Evaluation, Acreditation, University
Education, Communication A. Educational Evaluation in Latin America
For Latin America the development of evaluative
I. INTRODUCTION processes are recent processes and the Latin Governments
initiated their evaluation systems, with the consequent
The evaluation is associated with measurement, impact and resistance on the part of a population without
accountability and auscultation, so the first reaction is culture of mechanisms of continuous improvement or of
rejection of evaluation and accreditation processes, processes Evaluative.
especially if these processes are aimed at evaluating human
activities and their products. UNESCO (2005) defines Within the educational system the actors that are
evaluation as a process of storing and processing relevant, forming most successfully in these processes are the
valid and reliable information that allows decision-making students, the most resistant are the teachers, who are
and improvement of actions that yield better results. difficult to participate, exhibition of evidence of their
academic productivity and redesign of processes that
The accreditation of an academic program, in the improve their performance and their training.
educational system, is the recognition granted by an
evaluation body, as a result of a detailed process in which it Self –Evaluation
is determined that the program complies with criteria and Is the only way by which we recognize and analyze
indicators of quality in its structure, Organization, services, our own thoughts, acts and consequences. It reflects the
financing, relevance and results. perception of the educational process in which the
participants are inserted.
II. METHODS The above can be understood in two ways, the first is
the lack of this productivity because they focus their
This article presents the results of an observational activities to the fulfillment of hours in front of the group
and analytical type study, carried out at the Autonomous leaving the investigation in the background and thus the
University of Chiapas, Mexico. We analyzed the generation of academic products. The second is the lack of
evaluation/accreditation processes of four programs of institutional loyalty, not feeling institutional representatives
study within the area of the social sciences in a and showing what is "yours" is not part of your
multicultural context, within a state with poverty and commitment to work.
extreme poverty in most of its population.
Students
For the collection of data, an observational guide of They are loyal members and committed to the
perceptions, attitudes and practices of the social actors evaluative processes, both for being continually evaluated
involved in the evaluative processes was used. The by each teacher who interacts with them in their training
different groups of students, teachers, administrative and process, as for their commitment to the institution and the
participating directors were observed. ease with which they build processes of Analysis,
discussion and search for continuous improvement.
Sampling was at the convenience of the investigator,
choosing to observe the participating groups of evaluation B. Moving from Perception to Participation-Action
and accreditation processes during the period 2015-2018. To participate in the process of
accreditation/evaluation of a program of studies, implies
III. DISCUSSION commitment, desire to know, interest to improve the
academic development, loyalty. The social and
A. From the Same Process, Different Perceptions organizational climate of the institution plays a crucial role
Regarding the evaluation processes, perception and in the success of these processes. In a rigid, bureaucratic
behavior are different, between individuals and working environment, with dominant negative leaderships, it can
groups, where they focus power interests and leaderships become impossible to achieve the participation of all
both positive-building, and negative-destructive. members.
For the same process the perceptions are different, C. Communication Processes
both by the gender, type of leadership, as by the functions As an important part of any organizational process
or acting role that the individual plays. In the case of and, therefore, of the processes of accreditation or
educational evaluation and accreditation, university level, evaluation, communication is essential, it requires an
the scenario is presented as follows: integrative vision that involves the various social actors
with specific actions that address the Achieving the same
goal, strengthening the institution.