Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Division of Cagayan de Oro
GUSA REGIONAL SCIENCE HIGH SCHOOL-X
Gusa, Cagayan de Oro City

EVALUATION SHEET FOR SCIENCE VIDEO (Group) Presentation

Group Number:___________________ Lev/Sec:________________ Science Teacher: Mark Richie S. Lasque

Criteria 1 2
Content The content incudes a clear statement of Information is presented as a connected
purpose or theme and is creative, theme with accurate, current supporting
compelling and clearly written. A rich information that contributes to
variety of supporting information in the understanding the project’s main idea.
video contributes to the understanding of Details are logical and persuasive
the projects main idea. Events and information is effectively used. The
messages are presented in a logical order. content includes a clear point of view with
Includes properly cited sources. a progression of ideas and supporting
information. Includes properly cited
sources.
3 4
The content does not present a clearly
stated theme is vague, and some of the
supporting information does not seem fit
the main idea or appears as a
disconnected series of scenes with no
unifying main idea. Includes few citations
and few facts.
Score
Content lacks central theme, clear point of
view and logical sequence of information.
Much of the supporting information is
irrelevant to the over-all message. The
viewer is unsure what the message is
because there is little persuasive ____/40
information and only one or two facts pts.
about the topic are articulated.
Information is incorrect, out of date or
incomplete. No citations included.

(____/36-40 pts.) (____/31-35 pts.) (____/26-30 pts.) (____/25 pts.)

Quality Movie was completed and had all required
elements. The video was well edited and
moves smoothly from scene to scene with
proper use of transitions. Audio and other
enhancements were well used.
Movie was completed and contained all
required elements. Editing was not done
as well as it should have been. Some poor
shots remain movie is still somewhat
choppy. Audio and other enhancements
were utilized but not for maximum effect.
Video was made but had very little if any
editing. Many poor shots remain. Video
was very fragmented and choppy with
little to no audio reinforcement.
The video was totally unedited with no
transitions or audio support of any kind.
____/40
pts.

(____/36-40 pts.) (____/31-35 pts.) (____/26-30 pts.) (____/25 pts.)

Work Ethics Every individual in the group contributed
to the creation of the video project. Team
members showed interest to the task and
respect with each other.
(____/16-20 pts.)
1 member is not involved in the group
project. Team members mostly showed
interest to the task and respect with each
other.
(____/11-15 pts.)
Total Score
2-3 members are not involved in the group
project. Team members fairly showed
interest and respect with each other.
(____/6-10 pts.)
More than 3 members are not involved
and interested in the group project or
group members are not working during
____/20
the designated time or low levels of
pts.
respect were evident within the team.
(____/5 pts.)
_______/100
pts.

Evaluator:______________________________________________ Date:______________ Signature:_______________________________