Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
L. Ruiz, ''Manipulación manual de cargar, guía técnica del INSHT'', Instituto Nacional de Seguridad
e Higiene en el Trabajo, 2011.
METHODOLOGY
To achieve the purpose of the project, the following steps are considered:
• Measure the operating conditions that the elevator would have in the warehouse of the market in
order to determine the daily work cycles and the different loads to which it would be subject.
• Design the mobile work table on which the elevator and motor would be supported.
• Design the reducer system and its parts (gears, pinions, shafts and suspension cable reel).
• Evaluate the cost/benefit of the project and compare it with alternatives available in the market.
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
The normal storing operations in the warehouse during a standard day between week (Monday to
Friday) are about 10 charges per hour, those days the normal time work is of 10 hours a day. On
Saturdays the storing operations are about 15 chargers per hour with a normal time work of 12 hours
a day. The warehouse is closed on Sundays. Which means a total of around 680 chargers a week, 35360
a year as shown in Equation 1.
Assuming that the elevator could be overloaded with 70 kg of charge, plus a 5 kg additional load because of the cabin
wheels and rollers, based on the parameters of linear density for the profiles in Figure 2 and their dimensions for the
cabin, the total weight can be computed as shown in Equation (2).
𝑃𝑟 0.53 HP
𝑃𝑚 = 2 = = 0.639 𝐻𝑃
𝜂𝑐 ∙ 𝜂𝑏 2 0.922 ∙ 0.992
Fig. 6. Siemens brand three-phase motor catalog available in the local market.
A 0.75 HP three-phase motor must be selected to supply the power necessities. This value
leaves a 15% extra power with respect of the power required computed, that will help to
overcome the initial inertia of the cabin and load, and also the friction loses in pulleys and
rollers.
SPEED REDUCER
𝜔1 𝜔1 900 𝑟𝑝𝑚
𝑖1−2 = → 𝜔2 = = = 300 𝑟𝑝𝑚
𝜔2 𝑖1−2 3
Since the gears 2 and 3 are connected by the same shaft, in this way all the angular speeds
are defined. It is 𝜔1 =900 rpm, 𝜔2 =𝜔3 =300 rpm and 𝜔4 =100 rpm.
GEAR 1 (PINION) – GEAR 2 (GEAR)
For the first gear stage, the following parameters are given or proposed:
𝑚=2
8𝑚 ≤ 𝐹 ≤ 16𝑚 → 𝐹 = 14𝑚 = 28𝑚𝑚
𝑄𝑉 = 6
𝑃 = 0.75 𝐻𝑃 = 559.2 𝑊
𝜔1 = 900 𝑟𝑝𝑚 = 94.25 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠
𝜔2 = 300 𝑟𝑝𝑚 = 31.42 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠
𝑁1 = 32
𝑁2 = 96
𝐻𝐵1 = 240 𝐻𝐵
𝐻𝐵2 = 200 𝐻𝐵
𝑑 = 𝑚 ∙ 𝑁 → 𝑑1 = 64 𝑚𝑚, 𝑑2 = 192 𝑚𝑚
CHECK OF VELOCITY
𝑑
𝑉= ∙ 𝜔 → 𝑉1 = 3.02 𝑚/𝑠, 𝑉2 = 3.02 𝑚/𝑠
2
According to Figure 10 the geometric factor for the first gear stage J = 0.39.
K FACTORS
𝐴 𝐵 12−𝑄𝑣 2
𝐾𝑣 = ( ) ,𝐵=( )3 , 𝐴 = 50 + 56(1 − 𝐵)
𝐴+√200𝑉𝑡 4
The 𝐶𝑝 , 𝐶𝑓 , and 𝐼 parameters are needed. According to [6], the elastic coefficient
𝐶𝑝 for steel gears is 191 MPa and 𝐶𝑓 assuming a good surface finish is 1. The
surface geometry factor can be computed as:
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜙𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜙
𝐼= = 0.12
1 1
𝑑(𝑟 + 𝑟 )
𝑝 𝑔
Finally, CH depends of the hardness ratio which in this case is set to 1.2 which indicates a CH value of
1.005 according to Figure 11.
𝑺𝑭 = 𝟕. 𝟖𝟎 and 𝑺𝑯 = 𝟏. 𝟓𝟗
For the gear
𝑺𝑭 = 𝟕. 𝟎𝟑 and 𝑺𝑯 = 𝟏. 𝟒𝟏
GEAR 3 (PINION) – GEAR 4 (GEAR)
For the second gear stage, the following parameters are given or proposed:
𝑚=3
8𝑚 ≤ 𝐹 ≤ 16𝑚 → 𝐹 = 12𝑚 = 36𝑚𝑚
𝑄𝑉 = 6
𝜔3 = 300 𝑟𝑝𝑚 = 31.42 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠
𝜔4 = 100 𝑟𝑝𝑚 = 10.47 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠
𝑁1 = 30
𝑁2 = 90
𝐻𝐵1 = 240 𝐻𝐵
𝐻𝐵2 = 200 𝐻𝐵
The power of the second stage is the power of the first minus the transmission losses at the
moment, thus:
𝑺𝑭 = 𝟖. 𝟐𝟔 and 𝑺𝑯 = 𝟏. 𝟔𝟎
For the gear
𝑺𝑭 = 𝟕. 𝟒𝟓 and 𝑺𝑯 = 𝟏. 𝟒𝟕
ELEVATOR SYSTEM
D D
C C
00
0 0,
40
0
0 ,0
75
6,35
B B
6,35
Date Date
A Designed by Checked by Approved by
A
CACERES C. CACERES C. CASANOVA G.12/04/2019 04/04/2019
D D
1600,00
62,00
60,00 60,00
2,00
C C
766,00 750,00
1600,00
B B
5
6,3
766,00
12,00
100,00
Date Date
A Designed by Checked by Approved by
A
CACERES C. CACERES C. CASANOVA G.12/04/2019 06/04/2019
28,00
0
2,0
D 1 9 D
R40
,00
259,96
127,85
C C
,00
R15
4 ,00
6
B B
195,94
Date Date
A Designed by Checked by Approved by
A
CACERES C. CACERES C. CASANOVA G.12/04/2019 11/04/2019
GEARS STAGE 1
ALL DIMENSIONS IN MM Edition Sheet
1-2-1 1/1
6 5 4 3 2 1
6 5 4 3 2 1
90 36,00
,0
0
0
R20,0
D D
27
0,0
179,98
0 0
365,97
R50,
C C
B B
275,99
Date Date
A Designed by Checked by Approved by
A
CACERES C. CACERES C. CASANOVA G.12/04/2019 06/04/2019
D D
40,30
,00 50
182,96
3 0 ,0
0
142,66
142,66
50
,0
0
213,00
C 453,00 C
159,34
206,20 246,80
118,37 30,00
30,00
B B
223,00
213,00
14,00
100,00 14,00
40,00
80,00
Date Date
A Designed by Checked by Approved by
A
CACERES C. CACERES C. CASANOVA G.12/04/2019 06/04/2019