Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Intestinal obstruction associated with pouches

and fenestrae in the broad ligament


Review of the literature and report of a case
'
HARRY N. PAPAS, M.D.
Akron, Ohio

I N T E s T I N A L obstruction based on ligament, gwmg the picture of an acute


broad ligament fenestrae seems to be ex- condition of the abdomen. Our case, here
tremely rare, even when compared with presented, is the fiftieth.
the uncommon forms of intestinal strangu-
lations into other peritoneal fossae and Historical
apertures. Early in 1889, Dulles 4 collected Before the twentieth century the first who
more than 70 cases of properitoneal hernia, mentioned such a condition was Quain, 14
and Moynihan/ in 1906, reported 81 cases in 1861, who found it at an autopsy in a
of hernia into the duodenal fossae, while 36-year-old woman who was admitted with
Judd, 8 in 1929, found 29 cases of strangu- a sudden, sharp pain in the lower abdomen
lations through holes of the mesentery. and who died 3 days after the onset of the
However, there have been reported in pain without being operated upon. At au-
the literature only 44 cases of intestinal ob- topsy he found that the bowel was in-
struction following protrusions and strangu- carcerated in two places on the right side
lations of loops of bowel through defects in of the pelvis; at one by old adhesions be-
the broad ligaments. In addition to these, tween the broad ligament and the mesentery
4 cases of defects in the broad ligament un- and at the other by an aperture in the
associated with strangulation have been right broad ligament.
described. Herrmann, 6 in 1925, reported one Treves, 15 in 1885, made a thorough de-
in a nulliparous girl of 18 years in whom scription of "hernias" of the intestines and
bilateral pouches were discovered during peritoneum, but he did not mention broad
the removal of an ovarian tumor. The ligament malformations as being responsi-
second case of the 4, was that of Pemberton ble for intestinal obstruction. Likewise,
and Sager, 12 who found bilateral holes at Moynihan/ in 1906, and Watchon do not
the points where the round ligament was refer to this condition.
brought through the broad ligament in a Barnard/ in 1910, mentioned that there
Baldy-Webster operation. Masson and At- was a case of hernia in a pouch in the broad
kinson10 reported, in 1934, a case of herni- ligament in the Museum of the London
ation of the right ovary and part of the Hospital, but it was not until 1917, when
Fallopian tube into a fold of the right broad Fagge 5 reported 2 cases of intestinal ob-
struction into pouches or through fenestrae
of the broad ligament, that surgical treat-
From the Department of Obstetrics and ment was instituted. Richardson/ 6 in 1920,
Gynecology, St. Thomas Hospital reported the fir!it instance of intestinal ob-
Present address: Department of struction following and definitely associated
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akron
City Hospital. with the Baldy-Webster operation.
172
Volume 8b Intestinal obstruction '!73
Number l

Anatomical considerations openings of about the same size which were


The broad ligaments are two thin fibrous symmetrical and with smooth edges. No
sheets, covered on both surfaces with peri- evident previous inflammation was found.
toneum, which extend from each side of Hunt, in his review, pointed out 3 causa-
the uterus to the lateral pelvic wall. At the tive factors: ( 1) congenital anomalies, (2)
upper end of each lateral margin of the internal lacerations as the result of preg-
uterus the Fallopian tube pierces the uterine nancy or labor, and (3) defects resulting
wall. Below and in front of this point, the from previous inflammatory processes. On
round ligament of the uterus is fixed, while the contrary, Goode and Newbern 11 be-
behind it is the attachment of the ligament lieved, because of the fact that in only one
of the ovary. On the lateral pelvic wall, case did intestinal obstruction occur during
behind the attachment of the broad liga- or shortly after the termination of preg-
ment, in the angle between the elevation nancy, that the second factor of Hunt can-
produced by the diverging of the hypo- not be proved. There is no doubt that preg-
gastric and external iliac vessels, is a slight nancy must play some role, because it was
fossa, the ovarian fossa, in which the ovary found that all except 4 patients were multip-
normally lies. The ligamentum ovarii pro- aras (nonpregnant). The same authors
prium extends between the ovary and the state that, in spite of the fact the meso-
cornu of the uterus and divides the broad salpinx is a thin, avascular region of the
ligament into two parts: the upper, tri- broad ligament, it is unlikely that stretch-
angular-the mesosalpinx-with the uterus, ing or direct pressure by loops of bowd
Fallopian tube, and ovary, respectively, as could produce these defects. Trauma by
boundaries, and the lower, which is bordered repeated protrusions of loops of intestine
by the uterus medially, the ovarian liga- into congenital fenestra, however, might
ment superiorly, the pelvic wall and the produce sufficient inflammation with result-
suspensory ligament of the ovary laterally. ant fibrous tissue strong enough to strangu-
Hunt/ in his review, stated that among 17 late the bowel. This causative mechanism
cases the incidence of pouches occurred 5 for intestinal obstruction requires many
times and the openings 12. Where the lo- years of such repeated mild trauma until
cation of the openings was mentioned, they the expression of the acute picture.
were situated above the ligamentum ovarii The Baldy-Webster operation for utnine
proprium twice and below once. The snspension was, according to Baron;' the
pouches always occurred below the ovarian most frequent predisposing factor. This is
ligament, near the uterus. due to two things: ( 1) improper closing of
the openings by stitching their edges to the
Etiology round ligament and (2) drawing the round
The opinion of the writers regarding the ligament through the broad ligament too
cause of the broad ligament defect differs far lateral to the uterus or uteroovarian
considerably. ligament, thus producing tension on. and
Pidcock13 suggests as a possible cause of later a tear of, the broad ligament.
the condition, in his case reported in March,
1924, the fact that all structures connected Signs and symptoms-diagnosis
with the uterus were in a relaxed condition Pemberton and Sager made the diagnosis
as a result of the pregnancy and that a of incarcerated intra-abdominal hernia in
coil of intestine had, in some manner, rup- a woman who experienced severe colicky-
tured the mesoligamentous fold. Dunn, 3 on like pain in the lower abdomen lO days
the other hand, in his review in 1926, stated after a Baldy-Webster operation. However,
that in his case it was probable that con- the only suspected intestinal obstruction
genital stomas existed because of the fact through a defect of the broad ligament in
that there were, in both broad ligaments, a patient who had undergone a uterine
174 Papas July, 1960
Am . .). Obst. & Gynec.

suspension 3 years previously, was made by Case report


the Italian, Amadei. 17 In none of the other A 34-year-old white woman, gravida iv, para
cases reported was the diagnosis made prior iv, was admitted at St. Thomas Hospital on
to laparotomy. The diagnosis was usually March 18, 1955, because of a sudden, cramplike
torsion or rupture of an ovarian cyst, stran- pain of 10 hours' duration, which first began in
the epigastrium and became localized with per-
gulated obturator hernia, mesenteric throm-
sistence in the left lower quadrant, accompanied
bosis, or acute appendicitis.
by nausea and vomiting.
Sudden, violent, and agonizing abdom- The physical examination showed a well-
inal pain followed by nausea and vomiting developed woman acutely ill with the following
are the most common symptoms with which findings: heart, normal; lungs, clear; abdomen,
this clinical condition begins. Sometimes, soft (the patient was given a dose of morphine
straining at stool or any other effort may sulfate) and slightly tender in the left lower
facilitate the onset of the pain, which may quadrant. No masses were palpated. The tem-
be general throughout the abdomen or more perature on admission was 100° F.; pulse, 100;
localized to a certain point, according to respirations, 20; blood pressure, 110j70. Com-
plete blood count was as follows: packed cell
the location of the lesion. The pain may
volume, 38; hemoglobin, 76 per cent or 12 Gm.;
be cramplike-as in our case--or colicky-
white blood count, 9,91 0.
like, constant with accentuations at short, At that time the diagnosis of rupture of a left
irregular intervals. ovarian cyst was made. The patient had under-
There are no bowel movements or pas- gone no operations and she had had 4 full-term
sage of flatus after the onset of the symp- normal deliveries. A flat plate of the abdomen
toms. On palpation there is tenderness and was taken on admission and revealed a dilated
sometimes rigidity at the point of the le- loop of small bowel in the left pelvic region and
sion. Sometimes a mass can be palpated no urinary stones. A mass was suspected roent-
in one of the lower quadrants. Rectovaginal genographically in the left pelvic region, to which
a loop of bowel was thought to be adherent.
examination gives findings such as tender-
The patient was taken to the operating room,
ness, thickening in the lateral fornix, and
and a laparotomy was performed. What was
occasionally a mass, but not always. In thought to be an ovarian cyst on the left side
nonobstructive herniations of bowels was a loop of small bowel that had entered a
through the broad ligament periodic pains small crib and formed a congenital opening in
are present which are accentuated by cer- the anterior broad ligament. There was approxi-
tain movements or positiOns of the body mately 8 inches of small bowel caught in this
(pulling of the mesentery) . It is worth opening. The bowel on first inspection, before
while to mention here that there is ab- it was released from the congenital defect in
sence of pain during pregnancy because of the broad ligament, was purplish in color. Soon
after the obstruction was released and the bowel
the closure of the opening as the uterus
was pulled through the opening, the color im-
ascends. Previous history of a uteropexy IS
proved considerably and, with the application
very helpful in making the diagnosis. of hot packs, after 30 to 45 minutes, the in-
carcerated bowel regained its normal color, and
Treatment-prognosis there was no area of devitalization. An appendec-
Immediate laparotomy should be per- tomy was performed. The opening in the left
formed, and the incarcerated intestine broad ligament was sutured by a continuous
aiong with obliteration of the pouch or suture of No. 1 chromic catgut. Inspection of
the right broad ligament showed an incomplete
fenestra must be released. Removal of the
opening in the same region as on the left; this
adnexa may be preferable in an elderly was closed. The abdominal wall was closed in
woman or if the circulation is seriously the usual manner, and the patient was returned
impaired. The mortality rate and prognosis to her room in good condition. The postopera-
depend on how early the abdominal ex- tive course was uneventful, and she was dis-
ploration is instituted. charged in good condition 9 days after admission.
Volume llll Intestinal obstruction 75
Number 1

Summary 4. In an acute intestinal obstruction,


1. An acute intestinal obstruction through herniation of the bowel through pouches or
a fenestra of the broad ligament in a woman fenestrae of the broad ligament is om· of
who had never undergone previous opera- the possibilities which should be borne in
tion is presented. mind, especially in women who have under-
2. In spite of the rarity of this condition gone uterine suspension.
its seriousness necessitates immediate inter-
vention. My sincere thanks to Dr. C. Paternite, former
3. The etiology of this condition is diffi- chief of the Obstetrics-Gynecology Department
cult to determine except in those cases as- of St. Thomas Hospital, Akron, Ohio, for per-
sociated with previous uteropexy. mission to present his case.

REFERENCES
9. Moynihan, B. G. A.: On Retroperitoneal
1. Barnard, H. L.: Contributions to Abdominal Hernia, ed. 2, New York, 1906, William
Surgery, London, 1910, Edward Arnold & Wood & Company.
Company, p. 216. 10. Masson, J. C., and Atkinson, W.: Proc. Staff
2. Baron, A.: Brit. J. Surg. 36: 91, 1948. Meet. Mayo Clin. 8: 293, 1933.
3. Dunn, L.: Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 42: 398, 11. Goode, T. V., and Newbern, W. R.. Am.
1926. J. Surg. 65: 127, 1944.
4. Dulles, C. W.: J. A. M. A. 13: 557, 1889. 12. Pemberton, J. de J., and Sager, W. W.:
5. Fagge, C. H.: Brit. J. Surg. 5: 694, 1918. , S. Clin. North America 9: 203, 1929.
6. Herrmann, E.: Zentralbl. Gynak. 49: 63, 13. Pidcock, B. H.: Brit. M. J. 1: 369, 1924.
1925. 14. Quain: Tr. Path. Soc. London 12: 103, 1861.
7. Hunt, A. B.: Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 58: 906, 15. Treves, F.: Brit. M. J. 1: 415, 1885.
1934. 16. Richardson, E. P.: Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 31:
8. Judd, J. R.: Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 48: 264, 90, 1920.
1929. 17. Amadei, A.: Gior. ita!. chir. 2: 261. 194·6.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen