Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Our eyes were drawn to several Energy Points above the market and we monitored each

one, looking for a high probability trade set up with an


acceptable initial stop loss to enter a long position. You can see that price got
dragged to the Energy Points [a key attribute of Energy Points] and
then finally at the sixth Energy Point, we saw what we were looking for: A high
probability trade set up that I teach and trade all the time [in this
case, a test and re-test] with an acceptable initial stop loss order area that was
hidden below market structure. Hiding our stops UNDER market
structure is key, because other traders will have limit buy orders near or at that
market structure [in this case, a prior swing low] and their limit buy
orders will act as protection for our stop loss orders.
In this trade, we wanted to get long Crude Oil futures at 96.37 with an initial
stop loss at 95.63�hid underneath a prior swing low where other
traders were leaving limit buy orders. Our profit order would be at the Upper
Median Line Parallel, which initially came in at 102.29. We were risking
74 cents per barrel to make a potential 5 dollars and 92 cents�giving us an initial
risk reward ratio of 8:1. And as time moved price to the right on
the chart, the profit target and our potential profits would go higher.
We checked our orders and put them in the market and our entries were filled on the
next bar. You can see our position was never in any danger of
being stopped out after the second bar closed and then we simply had to manage the
stop profit and limit sell orders as price unfolded�As I say
over and over, you spend the majority of your time when trading doing the tedious
work: moving orders, checking details, and waiting, waiting,
waiting.
Price finally met the Upper Median Line and took us out above 105 a barrel and we
obviously made a great deal of money per contract on this
trade.
But there�s a problem: While this trade unfolded on the charting package we were
using exactly as you see on this chart, if you look carefully before
price turned higher, I marked a wide range bar with the term �Incorrect Bar High�.
In reality, the high of this bar was nowhere near as high as initially
reported by the exchange. In fact, the high of this bar was actually about THREE
dollars per barrel lower than it was initially reported. It�s difficult to
know what caused the initial tick to be reported that high: It may have been a
glitch at the exchange, it may have been a glitch at the data server
farm at the firm we get our data from. But in any case, it is a phantom high�it
never traded anywhere near that high! Our charting programs
generally go back and correct small tick errors but this error was so far out of
the range, the normal tick filtering mechanism in our charting program
didn�t flag it and replace it. It stayed at that high level.
Yet we made our money using that phantom high as one of our pivots. This leads me
to point out that you can�t spend your day worrying about the
validity of each tick as they unfold�you have to trade what you see and trust you
are seeing a representative picture of the market.
How did I find this �phantom tick�? I regularly do a type of homework on two of my
charting platforms after the market closes. They have the ability to
replay price action from a number of days at thirty times the speed that price
actually happens in �real time� during the day, so I can practice looking
for set ups in �sped up� time over and over in a number of markets whenever I wish.
I find this tool very valuable and I am always surprised that
more traders don�t use this tool to practice after the markets close.
Several days after this trade was closed, I was doing my replay homework on a
charting package that we had NOT used when making the Crude
Oil trade. As price unfolded before my eyes, I began to recognize the market and
paid strict attention, looking for a change in behavior. Let me show
you what I saw on the �other� charting package:

Dr. Alan Andrews drew inspiration from Roger Babson for the creation of the
pitchfork.

Roger developed the concept of action/reaction lines after witnessing a significant


market correction in the early 1900s.

After seeing billions of dollars evaporate into thin air, Babson believed his
action/reaction lines were a preventive measure for future would-be investors by
providing price action for extreme support and resistance areas in the market.

Like Andrew, Babson also took inspiration from another brilliant person - Isaac
Newton.

Babson's lines were inspired by the works of Isaac Newton and the laws of gravity.
Most of the pitchfork's concepts are focused around Newton's third law which states
"For every action, there is an equal and an opposite reaction."
Learn to Trade Stocks, Futures, and ETFs Risk-Free

If that was tough to follow, let's quickly recap. Andrew pulled inspiration from
Babson who also pulled inspiration from Newton.

Why is this important to know? You need to know that while the indicator looks like
something a smart fourth grader could have created, a lot of thought has been given
to the indicator.

The Andrews pitchfork works in any time frame. This, of course, can range from tick
charts to monthly. This allows the indicator to work well for day trading and long-
term investing.

The indicator can also work on any security. So, whether you like to trade
cryptocurrencies, futures or stocks, the pitchfork has you covered.

Traders need to identify the right points as the success or failure of interpreting
signals depends largely on how one plots the median lines.

In most cases, drawing the median lines is rather subjective, but with practice,
one can develop the confidence required. A rather simple method is after pivot
points are identified, tweak the median lines to encapsulate price action with the
greatest level of accuracy.

There are many different trading strategies that can be built using the Andrews�
pitchfork tool.

According to Alan H. Andrews, there is a high probability of the following:

Price will reach the latest median line


Price will either reverse on reaching the median line or gap through it
When prices pass through the median line, more often than not, prices pull back
to the median line
When price reverses before reaching the median line, it is likely price will
move in the opposite direction
Prices will reverse at any median line

One of the major factors that work in favor of median lines or the pitchfork tool
is that various studies have shown and proven the fact there is an 80% chance for
any of the above Andrews� rules to be fulfilled.

Is any of this making sense?


Andrew's Pitchfork can be easily applied to price charts without a specialized
drawing tool.

Point 1: starting point of uptrend or downtrend.


Points 2 and 3: reaction high and reaction low in the uptrend or downtrend.
Point 1 = starting point of median trend line.
Distance between Points 2 and 3 = channel width.
Draw and extend a trend line from Point 1 through the midpoint of Points 2 and
3.
Draw and extend trend lines from Points 2 and 3 parallel with the median trend
line.
Change Pitchfork slope by changing Point 1.

One technique of Alan Andrews' is the price failure rule which often catches the
larger trading community by surprise.

The price failure rule was well documented and explained by Gordon DeRoos, in his
book, �Trading With The Pitchfork�.

If you follow this link you can see both the book and trading coursework which goes
into excruciating detail.

The price failure rule forces the trader to look at what prices are not doing,
rather than following the herd.

It is widely known that prices gravitate to the median line 80% of the time. Once
at the median line, there are two possibilities - price will either gap through the
median line or reverse course.

With the price failure rule, traders focus on the factor of when price fails to
reach the median line.

A trader waits for the price to reverse near the median line and waits for the
strong counter move.
Real-Life Long Example

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen