Sie sind auf Seite 1von 68

IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-

CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE


RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JULY, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 162 of 2017


in
Crime No. 524 of 2007
In
S.C. No. 58 of 2017
(P.S. Malkajgiri)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Habeed Aidross S/o. Habeed Hussain,


Aged about 40 years, Occ: Auto Driver,
R/o. 9-22/1, Royal Colony, Balapur,
Pahadisharif , Hyderabad.

Petitioner/Accused No.1
AND

The State of Telangana through,


P.S.Malkajgiri.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri V.Sreedhar Reddy, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 524 of 2007 of Malkajgiri
Police Station registered under Sections 379, 356, 400 and 402 of IPC. This case
has been registerd as S.C. No. 58 of 2017.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 11.9.2007 the defacto complainant


lodged a complaint with the police stating that she was coming from her daughters
house in plot No. 76, CIEF colony, two unknown persons came behind her on Hero
motor bike and snatched her gold mangalasutram chain. During the course of
investigation, the investigation agency found that four persons gathered near Devi
Bar and Restaurant, Moulali with weapons to commit decoity in the vicinity of
Malkajgiri. On 4.12.2007, the police patrolling party caught hold the petitioner and
accused No.2 and recovered dummy pistol from petitioner.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor seriously opposed for the bail alleging that the petitioner and accused
Nos. 1 and 2 are serious offenders in chain snatching cases and they involved in
several cases. If the petitioner is released on bail they will not attend the court.

5. Perused the case records. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from
17.12.2016. The police has not taken any action to remand the petitioner in other
crimes in which the petitioner is involved. There is no explanation from the side of
Addl. Public Prosecutor as to why the concerned police has not taken any action for
remand of the petitioner in other crimes in which he involved. Considering the facts
and circumstances of the case and as the sessions case is coming for framing of
charges the request of the petitioner/accused No.1 for grant of bail is considered
and the petitioner/accused No.1 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution
of a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two sureties
for a like sum to the satisfaction of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at
Malkajgiri, R.R. District.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 1st day of


July, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

Copy to

X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, R.R. District.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT:: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT: SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2337 of 2017


in
Crime No. 13 of 2016

(P.S. Malkajgiri)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

G.Nagaraju S/o G.Venkatesham, Aged about 45 years, Occ:


Business, R/o H.No. 42-63, Plot NO. 63A, oula-Ali, Malkajgiri,
Rangareddy District.
… Petitioner/Accused
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Malkajgiri, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. V.SuReedhar Reddy, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of

anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in crime No. 13/2016 of Malkajgiri Police

Station registered under Sections 354, 323, 452 and 420 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.01.2016the police received a

complaint filed by the defecto complainant before court which was forwarded to

police by the court. It is alleged in the complaint that the petitioner borrowed a sum

of Rs. 10,00,000/- on 29.08.2014 from defecto complainant and failed to repay the

same. To discharge the said amount the petitioner issued two cheques on

07.09.2015 for a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- but the said cheques were dishonored for

the reason of funds insufficient in the account of the petitioner. The defecto

complainant filed a criminal case under section 138 of NI Act against the petitioner

and the same is pending. On 08.11.2015 the petitioner trespassed in to the house
of the defecto complainant and threatened the defecto complainant and assaulted

the defecto complainant and when the wife of the defecto complainant intervened

the petitioner pulled her hand and outraged her modesty.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. As seen from the case diary and the contents of the

complaint it is clear that the custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required

in this crime. Hence the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is

considered and the petitioner / accused is ordered to be enlarged on bail in the

event of his arrest on his execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two

sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Inspector of police Malkajgiri police

station.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 29th day of June
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

Copy to

SHO Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2356 of 2017


in
Crime No. 418 of 2017

(P.S. Kushaiguda)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

M.Dinesh Kumar, S/o M.Bhasker, aged about 45 years, Occ:


Pvt. Employee, R/o H.No. Flat NO. 302, Megan Enclave,
Chandragiri Colony, Near DAV Public School, Neredmet,
R.R.District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.2.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Kushaiguda, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. P.Sudheer Kumar, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.2 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of

anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No. 2 in crime No. 418/2017 of Kushaiguda

Police Station registered under Sections 420, 406 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.06.2017 the defecto complainant

lodged a complaint before of police stating that the defecto complainant running

cable TV Network and the defecto complainant appointed the accused No.1 for

collection of amount from the cable customers. The accused No.1 failed to give the

collection amount to the defecto complainant and the accused No.1 forcibly

collecting amounts from the customers from the month of April 2017 onwards. On

the basis of the said complaint police registered a case and took up investigation.

During the course of investigation police arrested the accused No.1 on 06.06.2017
and produced the accused No.1 for judicial custody. During the course of

investigation it is revealed that the petitioner and the accused No.1 colluded

together and cheated the defecto complainant.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. In this crime the accused No.1 was already enlarged

on bail. As seen from the case records it is clear that most of the investigation in to

the case has been completed. Further the custodial investigation of the petitioner is

not required in this crime at this stage. Hence the request of the petitioner for grant

of anticipatory bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.2 is directed to

surrender himself before XX Metropolitan Magistrate Malkajgiri on or before

14.07.2017 and on his surrender the petitioner / accused No.2 is ordered to be

enlarged on bail on his execution of bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two

sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate

Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 29th day of June
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate Malkajgiri


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2448 of 2017


in
Crime No. 383 of 2017

(P.S. Kushaiguda)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Mr. Umesh Harish Sawant, S/o Harishchandra P Sawant, Age


about 54 years, Occ: Director Super Packing Machines Pvt. Ltd.,
O/o 208/3, Phase –II, IDA, Cherlapally.

… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Kushaiguda, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. Thomas George, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of

anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No. 1 in crime No. 383/2017 of Kushaiguda

Police Station registered under Sections 406, 420 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.05.2017 the defecto complainant

lodged a complaint before Inspector of police Kushaiguda Police Station alleging

that the defecto complainant approached the accused No.1 for purchase of bottle

filling, Caping, Shrink sleeves machine and advanced a sum of Rs. 16,62,500/- on

23.12.2016. The petitioner failed to supply the machine and agreed to return the

amount. The petitioner returned only Rs. 5,00,000/- to the defecto complaint and

failed to return the balance amount of Rs. 11,62,500/-. On basis of the complaint

of the defecto complainant, Sub Inspector of police registered a case


and took up investigation.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner approached the Hon’ble High Court

for quash of proceedings in Crime No. 383/2017 and also asked the court for stay

of further proceedings including arrest in Crime No. 383/2017 of Kushaiguda police

station. The Hon’ble High Court passed orders in Criminal Petition No. 4139/2017

and also in Crl.MP.No. 3984/2017 and in the said orders the Hon’ble High Court

rejected the plea of the petitioner for stay of further proceedings including arrest in

Crime No. 383/2017 of Kushaiguda Police station and the Hon’ble High Court

directed the Station House Officer Kushaiguda Police Station to follow the procedure

as contemplated under section 41 A of Cr. P.C. Since the Hon’ble High Court has

not considered the request of the petitioner for stay of all further proceedings

including arrest of the petitioner in Crime No. 383/2017 of Kushaiguda Police

Station, under orders dated 08.06.2017 in Crl. Petition No. 4139/2017 and in

Crl.MP.No. 3984/2017, the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is

not considered and this petition is dismissed.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 29th day of June
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2334 of 2017


in
Crime No. 399 of 2017

(P.S. Naredmet)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Akthar Shabana W/o Mukul Shaik, Aged about 24 years, Occ:


House wife, R/o North 24 Paraganas, West Bengal. N/o Faridpur,
Dhaka Bangladesh.

… Petitioner/Accused No.2.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Naredmet, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. G.Laxmi Narsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.2 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of

bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No. 2 in crime No. 399/2017 of Naredmet Police

Station registered under Sections 370-A(2), 420, 468, 47, 474 IPC and under

sections 4 and 5 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act and under section 14 of

Foreigners Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.05.2017 the petitioner and other

accused brought the victim lady to defence colony to hand over to the customer for

doing prostitution. Inspector of police arrested the petitioner and other accused and

on interrogation the petitioner revealed that the petitioner is Bangladesh National

and he is regularly visiting India and the petitioner is indulged in organizing


prostitution by procuring women from different parts of India. The petitioner came

in to contact with other accused who are also involved organizing prostitution. The

petitioner and accused procured the victim lady and uploaded her photos and

mobile number in website and they received message from customer and to hand

over the victim lady to customer the petitioner and other accused went to defence

colony along with victim lady and on information Inspector of Police arrested the

petitioner and other accused and registered a case and took up investigation. The

further case of the prosecution is that the accused No.1 directed the other accused

to take the victim lady to defence colony.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from

27.05.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear most of the investigation into

the case has been completed. Hence, the request of the petitioner for grant of bail

is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on

her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to

the satisfaction of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at

Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 22nd day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2322 of 2017


in
Crime No.415 of 2017

(P.S.Kushaiguda)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Dhandeti Sai Krishna @ Suresh S/o Venkata Ramulu Aged about


29 years, Occ: Marketing Job R/o Flat NO. 501, R.K. Towers,
Balkampet, Hyderabad. N/o H.No. 9-14, Chinnapally (V),
Tadipatri (M), Ananthapur (D).
… Petitioner/Accused No.3.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Kushaiguda, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. V.Bapi Reddy, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.3 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No. 3 in crime No. 415/2017 of Kushaiguda

Police Station registered under Sections 370-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of

Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 04.06.2017 while the Inspector of

police along with his staff checking the vehicles at Radhika Cross Roads found two

male persons and one female travelling in a taxi car. On seeing the police the said

persons tried to escape from the police. Inspector of police apprehended the said

persons and on examination they disclosed their names as accused Nos. 2 and 3.

The accused Nos. 2 and 3 voluntarily confessed that they are working under Sai

baba Goud (A1) who is organizing on line prostitution network . The accused No.1

instructed the petitioner and Accused No.2 to drop the victim at Kushaiguda area
where the customer is residing. Inspector of police registered a case and took up

investigation and produced the petitioner and accused No.2 before court for judicial

custody.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public

prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the petitioner may involve in

similar offence and tamper the evidence if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from

04.06.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioner is

concerned, most of the investigation into the case has been completed. Hence, the

request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner/accused

No.3 is ordered to be enlarged on bail, on his execution of a bond for a sum of

Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX

Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 22nd day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE-CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 150 of 2017


in
S.C. No. 153 of 2011
in
Crime No. 30 of 2009
(P.S.Neredmet)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
BETWEEN:

B.Nagaraju, S/o. B.Shankar,


Aged about 29 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee,
R/o. H.No. 30-1495, Vinayak Nagar,
Neredmet, Medchal District,
N/o. Guntur District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.3
AND

The State of AP. through P.S. Naredment


Cyberabad, Rep. by its Addl. Public Prosecutor.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri B.Sravan Kumar, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.3
and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the
material papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this
court made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in SC. No 153 of 2011. The offences


alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 302, 201 read
with 34 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the accused No.1 and the deceased
are cousins. The petitioner and accused Nos. 2 and 4 are associates of the
accused No.1. There was disputes between the accused No.1 and the
deceased. In pursuance of the preplan of the accused Nos. 1 and 2 on
28.12.2008 they took the deceased to Yapral and consumed liquor. The
accused Nos. 1 and 2 called the accused Nos. 3 and 4. The petitioner and
accused Nos. 1 and 2 committed murder of the deceased by strangulating
the deceased and thereafter the petitioner and other accused dumped the
dead body of the deceased in a railway track.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The learned


Addl. Public Prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the petitioner
is involved in other serious crimes and the petitioner is enlarged on bail it is
very difficult for the prosecution to secure the presence of the petitioner.

The prosecution apprehended the petitioner after a very long period of


issuing NBW against the petitioner. Petitioner is remanded in this case on
22.11.2016. In this case Now bailable warrant is pending against accused
No.1. There is every likelihood of delay of disposal of this case in view of
pendency of NBW against the accused No.1. In view of this and as the
petitioner has been in judicial custody from 22.11.2016 onwards the request
of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner/ accused
No. 3 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution of a bond for a sum
of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of this
court.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 20th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2160 of 2017


in
Crime No.796 of 2015
(P.S.Kushaiguda)
(PRC 28/2016 on the file of XX Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Chinni @ Mudusu Ramya,


W/o. Aditya Naidy @ Shanker,
Aged about 27 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o.H.No.1-2-34, Arundathi Colony,
Mouali, Hyderabad, R.R. District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Kushaiguda, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 796 of 2015 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is main organizer of brothel
house. On 31.10.2013 Inspector of police registered a case, investigated in to the
same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2165 of 2017


in
Crime No.559 of 2013
(P.S.Kushaigduda)
(PRC 54/2016 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Dasari Anjali @ Mudusu Ramya,


W/o. Aditya Naidu @ Shanker@yakub,
Aged about 27 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o.Plot No.12, Jai Jawan Colony, Kapra, R.R. District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Kushaiguda, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 559 of 2013 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found running brothel
house. On 02.10.2013 Inspector of police registered a case, investigated in to the
same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

X Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2169 of 2017


in
Crime No. 46 of 2015
(P.S.Neredmet)

(PRC 7/2017 on the file of XX Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Anjali @ Mudusu Ramya,


W/o. Aditya Naidu @ Shanker@yakub,
Aged about 27 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o. Kakatiya nagar, Neredmet. Ranga Reddy District..
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Neredmet, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 46 of 2015 of Naredmet


Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and accused No.2 took a
house on rental basis at Kakatiyanagar, and started running brothel house in the
said premises. On 30.01.2015 Inspector of police registered a case, investigated in
to the same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2161 of 2017


in
Crime No.717 of 2015
(P.S.Kushaiguda)
(PRC 4/16 on the file of XX Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Chinni @ Mudusu Ramya,


W/o. Aditya Naidy @ Shanker,
Aged about 27 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o.H.No.1-2-39, Bowenpally Secunderabad,
N/o. Plot No.12, Jai Jawan Colony, Kapra, R.R. District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Kushaiguda, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 717 of 2015 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and accused No.2 are
organizers of brothel house and on 13.10.2015 Inspector of police registered a
case, investigated in to the same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner
and other accused.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2159 of 2017


in
Crime No.430 of 2015
(P.S.Kushaiguda)
(PRC .No. 19/2016 on the file of XX Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at
Malkajgiri)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Chinni @ Mudusu Ramya,


W/o. Aditya Naidy @ Shanker,
Aged about 27 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o.H.No.1-2-39, Bowenpally Secunderabad,
N/o. Plot No.12, Jai Jawan Colony, Kapra, R.R. District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Kushaiguda, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 430 of 2015 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is organizer of brothel


house and was found running brothel house in Plot No. 326 Nirmala nagar,
Sainikpuri. On 20.06.2015 Inspector of police registered a case investigated in to
the same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2164 of 2017


in
Crime No.410 of 2014
(P.S.Neredmet)
(PRC.No. 9/2017 on the file of XX Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Anjali @ Mudusu Ramya,


W/o. Aditya Naidu @ Shanker,
Aged about 27 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o.H.No.29-1382/5/38, Kakatiya Nagar,
Neredmet, Ranga Reddy District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.2.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Neredmet, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No.410 of 2014 of Neredmet


Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and accused No.1 are
running brothel house by procuring women from Vijayawada and West Bengal. On
12.09.2014 police registered a case against petitioner and other accused and after
investigation of the same, inspector of police Naredmet police station filed charge
sheet against the petitioner and accused.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.2 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2163 of 2017


in
Crime No.644 of 2015

(P.S.Neredmet)
( PRC 3/2016 on the file of XX Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malakjgiri)

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Anjali @ Mudusu Ramya,


W/o. Aditya Naidu @ Shanker,
Aged about 27 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o.H.No.29-1382/5/38, Kakatiya Nagar,
Neredmet, Ranga Reddy District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Neredmet, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No.644 of 2015 of Neredmet


Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is habitual organizer of


brothel house and the petitioner found organizing brothel house in Flat No. G5
Vijaya Gayathri Apartments, Naredmet. Inspector of police registered a case
against the petitioner and accused No.2 and investigated in to the same and filed
the charge sheet against the petitioner and accused No.2.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No.2162 of 2017


in
Crime No.567 of 2014 (PRC 27/2016)
(P.S.Neredmet)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Pagadala Anjali @ Mudusu Ramya @ Anjali,


W/o. Aditya Naidy @ Shanker,
Aged about 29 years, Occ: House wife,
R/o.H.No.29-1382/5/38, Kakatiya Nagar,
Neredmet, Ranga Reddy District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Neredmet, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.G.Laxminarsaiah, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No.567 of 2015 of Neredmet


Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is habitual organizer of


brothel house and the petitioner took house bearing No. 30-636/1 of Naredmet
and running brothel house. On information Inspector of police searched the said
premises and found that brothel activity in the said premises. Inspector of police
registered a case and investigated in to the same and filed charge sheet and the
petitioner and accused No.2.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

Copy to

X Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2254 of 2017


in
Crime. No. 363 of 2017
(P.S.Neredmet)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Behara Sri Krishna Chaitanya @ Chintu,


S/o.B.Jagan Mohan Rao,
Age : 28 years, Occ: Pvt Job,
R/o. Plot No.80, 83, Flat No.403,
Sri Siddi Residency, East Gandhinagar,
Rampally X Road, Keesara Mandal, R.R. District.
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana rep. through


P.S. Neredmet,Cyberabad.
Rep. by Public Prosecutor
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri.Sardar Harjeet Singh, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.1
and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 363/2017 of Naredment


Police Station registered under Section 306 R/w 34 of IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the wife of the petitioner
and they got married secretly. By knowing the same the family members of the
deceased and petitioner decided to perform marriage in a grand manner and both
sides fixed the date of marriage as 07.05.2017. Subsequently the petitioner
started avoiding the deceased and her family members and the deceased and his
family members filed a complaint before police as whereabouts of the petitioner
were not known to them. The family members of the deceased came to know that
the petitioner married the accused No.2 and since then the deceased went in to
depression. On 13.05.2017 the deceased committed suicide by hanging and put an
end to her life. The father of the deceased lodged a complaint before police and
police registered a case. During the course of investigation police arrested the
petitioner and other accused and produced them before court for judicial custody.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail on the ground
that investigation in to the case is still pending.

6. Perused the case records. the petitioner has been in judicial custody from
15.05.2017. The accused Nos. 2 and 3 have been enlarged on bail. As seen from
case record it is clear that most of the investigation in to the case has been
completed. Hence the request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and
the petitioner/accused No. 1 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution of
a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction
of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, R.R. District.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
To

XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad, Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE-CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2284 of 2017


in
Crime. No. 386 of 2017
(P.S.Kushaiguda)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
BETWEEN:

Shivaji Suresh Pawar, S/o.Suresh Tamma Pawar,


Aged about 30 years, Occ: Labour,
R/o. H.No.2-2-99/3A, Officers Colony,
Cherlapally, Hyderbad.
N/o.Lakhangaon, Ausa Taluq, Latur District.
… Petitioner/Accused.
AND

The State of AP. through P.S.Kushaiguda,


Cyberabad, Rep. by its Addl. Public Prosecutor.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. Yata Bhaskar, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court
made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.386 of 2017 of Kushaiguda


Police Station registered under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is the husband of the
deceased and their marriage took place on 24.05.2010. The petitioner
subjected the deceased to mental and physical cruelty and due to the
harassment of the petitioner the deceased committed suicide on 25.05.2017
On the complaint of the father of the deceased police registered a case and
took up investigation. During the course of investigation on 25.05.2017
police arrested the petitioner and produced the petitioner before court for
judicial custody.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.


5. Perused the case diary. As seen from the case diary it is clear that
entire investigation into the case has been completed. Charge is also
available in case diary. Hence, the request of the petitioner for grant of bail
is considered and the petitioner/ accused is ordered to be enlarged on bail
on his execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties for
like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District

Copy to

XX Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2234 of 2017


in
Crime. No. 117 of 2017
(P.S. Malkajgiri)
(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

B.Prabhakar Reddy S/o Veera Reddy Aged about 51 years, Occ:


Town Planning Officer, In Mahaboobnagar Municipality,
Mahaboobnagar District.

… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND

The State of Telangana through P.S. Malkajgiri, Cyberabad.

… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri S.Gurjit singh, Counsel for Petitioner/Accuse No.3 and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 117 of 2017 of Malkajgiri


Police Station registered under Sections 420, 406, 167 and 34 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant who is Deputy
Commissioner, GHMC, Malkajgiri, Circle 17 lodged a written complaint before court
alleging that as per the vigilance report the petitioner /accused No.1 who worked
as TSP in Malkajgiri Circle GHMC without verifying the nature of the land,
recommended the Dy. Commissioner, Malkajgiri circle for grant of building
permission for Government land and the accused No.2 allowed the party to make
constructions in the Government land. It is also found in the report that the
accused No.3 executed registered sale deeds without power to execute a registered
sale deed on behalf of Annapurna Housing Society and the accused No3.
fraudulently executed sale deeds. On the basis of the said complaint Inspector of
Police, Malkajgiri police station registered a case on 10.2.2017 and took up
investigation.
-2-

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor seriously opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation into
the case is not yet completed and if the petitioner is granted bail the petitioner may
escape from the locality and may also destroy the evidence.

5. Perused the case diary. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in the present case. Hence
the request of the petitioner/ Accused No.1 for grant of anticipatory bail is
considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is ordered to be surrender himself
before X Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad on or before 15.07.2017 and on his
surrender the petitioner / Accused No.1 is to be enlarged on bail on his execution of
a bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the
satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri.

The petitioner is further directed to make himself available as and when


required by the Investigation Officer for any investigation purpose in this crime.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 16th day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to

X Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malkajgiri


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2233 of 2017


in
Crime. No. 201 of 2017
(P.S. Keesara)
(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Syed Abdul Saleem, S/o.Syed Kareem Saheb,


Aged about 54 years, Occ: Advocate,
R/o. H.No.8-255/1, Road No.9, New Vivekananda Nagar,
Chintal, Hyderad-500 054, Cell :9848910670.
… Petitioners/Accused.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Keesara, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri. Syed Abdul Saleem, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.201 of 2017 of Keesara Police


Station registered under Sections 353, 506 of IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 07.06.2017 the defacto complainant


District Revenue Officer, Malkajgiri District, lodged a written complaint alleging that
on 07.06.2017 at about 7.00 PM the petitioner came to District Collector Office to
enquire about the grievance of Suresh Mohan who is the client of the petitioner,
when the District Revenue Officer requested the petitioner to come on the next day,
the petitioner abused the officers and threatened them. On the same day the
petitioner argued rashly with the District Collector. On the basis of the said
complaint sub Inspector of Police Keesara Police station registered a case and took
up investigation.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner is an advocate. As seen from the
case records it is clear that the custodial investigation of the petitioner is not
necessary at this stage in the present crime. Hence the request of the petitioner for
grant of anticipatory bail is considered and the petitioner/accused is ordered to be
enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest on his execution of a bond for a sum of
Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of Sub Inspector of
Police, Keesara Police Station.

The petitioner is further directed to make himself available as and when


required by the Investigation Officer for any investigation purpose in this crime.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 16th day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

Copy to

SHO Keesara
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2178 of 2017


in
Crime. No. 586 of 2016
(P.S. Malkajgiri)
(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

1. K.Chithrani D/o Late K.Amarsingh, Aged 24 y ears, Occ:


PettyBusiness, R/o H.No. 45-25, Rajanagar Colony, Uppariguda,
Moula-Ali, Malkajgiri Rangareddy District.

2. Shakthi Babyt @ Baby W/o S.Jitnder, Age 24 years, Occ:


Business, R/o H.No. 45-22, Upperiguda, Moula-Ali, Malkajgiri,
Rangareddy District,

3. Haroorker Siddappa @ Siddappa S/o Late Lingappa Age 44


years, Occ: Business, R/o 46-13, Sanjaygandhi Nagar,
Upperiguda, Moulali, Malkajgiri, R.R.District.

4. Shakthi .Balakishan @ Balakrishna S/o Shakthi Suraj Age 40


years, Occ: Business, R/o 45-70, Upperiguda, Moula-ali,
Malkajgiri, R.R.District.

… Petitioners/Accused 5 to 8.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Malkajgiri, Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of M/s. O. Lakshminarasimham, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused 5to
8 and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court made
the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioners are the accused Nos. 5 to 8 respectively in Crime No. 586 of
2016 of Malkajgiri Police Station registered under Sections 332, 353, 504, 506 R/w
34 of IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.9.2016, the defacto complainant


who is working as police constable lodged a written complaint stating that as per
the instructions of Inspector of Police, Osmani University Police station the defacto
complainant went to Uppariguda, Malkajgiri to brought the accused No.2 to police
station. When the defacto complainant informed the same to the accused No.2, the
petitioner and other accused assaulted the defacto complainant and caused
grievous injuries to the defacto complainant. On the basis of the said complaint
police registered a case and took up investigation.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public
prosecutor opposed for grant of bail on the ground that investigation in to the case
is not completed.

5. Perused the case dairy. In this crime the accused Nos. 1 and 4 are granted
anticipatory bail. The accused No.2 is surrendered before court and subsequently
enlarged on bail. Since the custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required
in the present case and as the Investigation Officer has recorded the confessional
statement of the accused No.2, the request of the petitioners for grant of
anticipatory bail is considered and the petitioners / accused 5 to 8 are ordered to
be enlarged on bail in the event of their arrest on their execution of a bond for a
sum of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of Sub
Inspector of Police, Malkajgiri Police Station.

The petitioners are further directed to make themselves available as and


when required by the Investigation Officer for any investigation purpose in this
crime.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 15th day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

Cop to

SHO Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF JUNE, 2016

Crl. M.P. No. 2217 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 383 OF 2017 of
Malkajgiri Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

1. Amrutham Sriniva S/o Late Ramulu Goud Aged about 54


years, Occ: Business, R/o Plot No. 196, LB Nagar Colony,
Shapur Nagar, IDA Jeedimetla, Hyderabad-500055.

2 . Praveen Alagani S/o Late A.Sriramulu, Aged about 45


years, Occ: Business R/o H.No. Alagani Nivas, H.No. 42-
545/2D, III Floor, Street No.2 MJ Colony, Moula-Ali, Hyd.

… Petitioner/Accused No. 1 and 2


AND

The State of Telangana through P.S.Malkajgiri.


Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of M/s. Police Venkat Reddy Counsel for Petitioner/Accused
No.1 and 2 and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal
of the material papers on record and having stood over for
consideration, this court made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioners are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively in Crime No.
383/2017 of Malkajgiri Police Station registered under Section 420 and 506
IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.05.2017 the defecto


complaint lodged a complaint before Inspector of police alleging that the
petitioner No.1 agreed to pay bank loan on the flats and the petitioner No.1
entered in to an agreement of sale in respect of Flat Nos. 103 and 104 for
consideration amount of Rs. 28 lakhs with the defecto complaint and
received entire consideration amount. Subsequently the petitioner No.1
executed General Power of Attorney in favour of the petitioner No.2. The
petitioners are threatening the tenants of the defecto complainant on the
basis of the said complaint, Inspector of police registered a case and took up
investigation.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case dairy it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required in the present crime
and hence the request of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is
considered and the petitioners / accused No.1 and 2 are ordered to be
enlarged on bail in the event of their arrest on their execution of a bond for
a sum of Rs. 5,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction
of Inspector of police, Malkajgiri police station.

The petitioner / accused No.1 and 2 shall make themselves available


for interrogation by the investigation officer as and when required.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 15th day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to:

SHO Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-Cum-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT:: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.

Crl. M.P. No. 2152 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 399 OF 2017 of

Naredmet police station


(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Kammara Madhu S/o Ramalinga, Aged about 23 years, Occ:


Computer Hardware, R/o H.No. 630 Ff, PJR Nagar,
Yellammabanda, Kukatpally, N/o Yemmiganur (V), Kurnool
District.

….. petitioner / Accused No.3


AND

The State of Telangana Through P.S. Naredmet.

….. Respondent/ Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the presence of
Sri S.Yadaiah, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused No. 3 and Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material papers on record and having
stood over for consideration, this court made the following:

ORDER

This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for grant of

bail.

2. The petitioner is accused No.3 in crime No. 399/2017 of Naredmet Police

Station registered under Sections 370-A(2), 420, 468, 47, 474 IPC and under

sections 4 and 5 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act and under section 14 of

Foreigners Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.05.2017 the petitioner and the

accused Nos.2,4 and 5 brought the victim lady to defence colony to hand over to

the customer for doing prostitution. Inspector of police arrested the petitioner and

accused No.2, 4 and 5 and on interrogation the petitioner revealed that the

petitioner and other accused are indulged in organizing prostitution by procuring

women from different parts of India. The petitioner and other accused procured the

victim lady and uploaded her photos and mobile number in website and they
received message from customer and to hand over the victim lady to customer the

petitioner and accused Nos. 2 4 and 5 went to defence colony along with victim

lady and on information Inspector of Police arrested the petitioner and accused

No.2,4 and 5 and registered a case and took up investigation. The further case of

the prosecution is that the accused No.1 directed the petitioner and other accused

to take the victim lady to defence colony.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from

27.05.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioner is

concerned most of the investigation into the case has been completed. Hence, the

request of the petitioner / accused No.3 for grant of bail is considered and the

petitioner / accused No.3 is ordered to be enlarged on bail, on his execution of a

bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of

the XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at Malkajgiri.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on


this the day of 13th day of June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

To

XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-Cum-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT:: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.

Crl. M.P. No. 2063 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 399 OF 2017 of

Naredmet police station


(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

1. Akthar Shabana W/o Mukul Shaik, Aged about 24 years, Occ:


House wife, R/o North 24 Paraganas, West Bengal, N/o
Faridpur, Dhaka Bangladesh.

2. Pothuluri Ramesh S/o Adishaiah, Aged about 27 years, Occ:


Driving, R/o Plot No . 29, WCH Society, Srikrishanagar,
Ameerpet, Hyderabad. N/o Ravulapalem (V), Indupurpet (M),
Nellore.

3. Bomma Munni S/o Prakash Aged about 27 years, Occ:


Labour, R/o Near Vamshi Hospital, Tirumulgherry, Hyderabad.

….. petitioner / Accused No.2,4 and 5


AND

The State of Telangana Through P.S. Naredmet.

….. Respondent/ Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the presence of
Sri G.Laxmi Narsaiah, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused No. 2, 4 and 5 and Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material papers on record and
having stood over for consideration, this court made the following:

ORDER

This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of

bail.

2. The petitioners are the accused No. 2, 4 and 5 respectively in crime No.

399/2017 of Naredmet Police Station registered under Sections 370-A(2), 420, 468,

47, 474 IPC and under sections 4 and 5 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act and

under section 14 of Foreigners Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.05.2017 the petitioners and the

accused No.3 brought the victim lady to defence colony to hand over to the

customer for doing prostitution. Inspector of police arrested the petitioners and
accused No.3 and on interrogation he revealed that the petitioner No.1 is

Bangladesh National and he is regularly visiting India and the petitioner No.1 is

indulged in organizing prostitution by procuring women from different parts of

India. The petitioner No. 1came in to contact with petitioners 2 and 3 and other

accused who are also involved organizing prostitution. The petitioners procured the

victim lady and uploaded her photos and mobile number in website and they

received message from customer and to hand over the victim lady to customer the

petitioners and accused No.3 went to defence colony along with victim lady and on

information Inspector of Police arrested the petitioner and accused No.3 and

registered a case and took up investigation. The further case of the prosecution is

that the accused No.1 directed the other accused to take the victim lady to defence

colony.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. The petitioners have been in judicial custody from

27.05.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioners 2

and 3 are concerned most of the investigation into the case has been completed.

Hence, the request of the petitioners 2 and 3 / accused 4 and 5 for grant of bail is

considered. In view of the allegation of the prosecution that the petitioner No.1 who

obtained Aadhar card and voter ID card fraudulently with fake name, the request of

the petitioner No.1 for grant of bail at this stage is not considered.

In the result, petition is allowed. The petitioners 2 and 3 / accused Nos. 4

and 5 are ordered to be enlarged on bail, on their execution of a bond for a sum of

Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX

Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at Malkajgiri. The petition against

petitioner No.1 / accused No.2 is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on


this the day of 13th day of June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
To

XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-Cum-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT:: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.

Crl. M.P. No. 2181 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 415 OF 2017

(P.S. Kushaiguda)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:

Zanwar Vishal @ Preeth, S/o Govind Prasad, Aged about 29


years. Occ: Business, R/o H.No. 14-8-205, Chudi Bazar,
Hyderabad.

….. petitioner / Accused No.2


AND

The State of Telangana Through P.S. Kushaiguda.

….. Respondent/ Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the presence of
Sri D.Satish Kumar, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused No. 2 and Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material papers on record and having
stood over for consideration, this court made the following:

ORDER

This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for grant of

bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No. 1 in crime No. 415/2017 of Kushaiguda

Police Station registered under Sections 370-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of

Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 04.06.2017 while the Inspector of

police along with his staff checking the vehicles at Radhika Cross Roads found two

male persons and one female travelling in a taxi car. On seeing the police the said

persons tried to escape from the police. Inspector of police apprehended the said

persons on examination they disclosed their names as accused Nos. 1to 3. The

accused Nos. 2 and 3 voluntarily confessed that they are working under Sai baba

Goud (A1) who is organizing constitution on line. The accused No.1 instructed the

petitioner and Accused No.2 drop the victim at Kushaiguda area where the
customer is residing. Inspector of police registered a case and perused the

petitioner and accused No.3 before court for judicial custody.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public

prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the petitioner may involved in

similar offence and tampered the evidence if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from

04.06.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioner is

concerned, most of the investigation into the case has been completed. Hence, the

request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner/accused

No.2 is ordered to be enlarged on bail, on his execution of a bond for a sum of

Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX

Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at Malkajgiri.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on


this the day of 12th day of June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.

To

XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at Malkajgiri.


IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF JUNE, 2016

Crl. M.P. No. 2179 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 162 OF 2017 of
Kushaiguda Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

1. Smt Tella Suguna W/o Tella Srinath, Aged 57 years,


Occ: Andhra Bank Employee, resident of D.No. 54-19-
21/9, 1A-Satya Haven Apartments, L.I.C. Colony,
Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.

2. Tella Srinath S/o Late Sri. Krishnaiah Choudary, Aged


59 years, Occ: Employee, resident of D.No. 54-19-21/9,
1A-Satya Haven Apartments, L.I.C. Colony, Vijayawada,
Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.

… Petitioner/Accused No.2 and 3


AND

The State of Telangana Rep. by its public Prosecutor,


Rnagaredy District.
Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of M/s.Ch. Ravinder Rao, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.2
and 3 and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the
material papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this
court made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 162/2017 of Kushaiguda


Police Station registered under Section 498-A, 506 IPC and under sections 3
and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.03.2017 the defecto


complaint lodged a written complaint stating that the accused No.1 is the
husband of the defecto complainant and their marriage took place on
04.03.2015. The parents of the defector complaint gave cash of RS. 50 lakhs
and gold jewellery worth of Rs. 50 lakhs. The accused No.1 was working in
a soft ware company and during the month of October 2015 the accused
No.1 shifted to Swidden from Poland. On 01.01.2016 the accused No.1
shifted to U.S.A. At the instigation of the petitioners the accused No.1
subjected the defecto complainant to cruelty for additional dowry amount.
On the basis of said complaint the police registered a case and took up
investigation.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional


public prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation in
to the case is not yet completed and there is every likelihood of the
petitioner leaving India if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case dairy. The petitioner No.1 is the father and petitioner
No.2 is the mother of accused No.1. The defecto complainant is the daughter
in law of the petitioners. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required in this crime. Hence
the request of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is considered and
the petitioners are directed to surrender themselves before XX Metropolitan
Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 01.07.2017 and on their surrender the
petitioners / accused Nos. 2 and 3 are ordered to be enlarged on bail on his
execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties for a like
sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri. The
petitioners / accused Nos. 2 and are directed to appear before Inspector of
police Kushaiguda police station on every 1st Sunday of the month between
8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until further orders.

The petitioners/ accused Nos. 2 and 3 shall make themselves available


for interrogation by the investigation officer as and when required. Further
the petitioners are directed not to leave the country without the permission
of the trial court.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 9th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to:
XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF JUNE, 2016

Crl. M.P. No. 2180 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 643 OF 2016 of
Naredmet Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Smt K. Madhavi W/o Late K.Satyanarayana, Aged about


32 years, Occ: House wife, R/o H.No. 29-47, Old
Ramalayam, Malkajgiri Hyderabad.

… Petitioner/Accused
AND

The State of Telangana through PS Naredmet,


Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of M/s P.Gopal Reddy, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court
made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 643/2016 of Naredmet


Police Station registered under Section 174 Cr.P.C subsequently the section
of law is altered to section 306 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the husband of the
petitioner and their marriage performed during the year 2009. The petitioner
gave birth to three children out of wedlock and all are minors. On
12.12.2016 the deceased and the petitioner quarreled and on that the
deceased committed suicide by setting herself to fire. Subsequently the
deceased died on 14.12.2016 while undergoing treatment. Initially police
registered a case under section 174 Cr.P.C and subsequently the section of
law is altered to section 306 IPC.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional
public prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation in
to the case is not yet completed.

5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in this crime. The
petitioner is lady and is having three minor children. No specific serious
allegations are alleged against the petitioner in the complaint. Under the
above circumstances the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory
bail is considered and the petitioner/ accused is ordered to be enlarged on
bail in the event of her arrest on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.
5,000 /- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of Inspector of
police, Neredmet police station.

The petitioner / accused shall make herself available for interrogation


by the investigation officer as and when required.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 9th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to:

SHO Neredmet.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF JUNE, 2016

Crl. M.P. No. 2138 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 714 OF 2017 of
Malkajgiri Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Syed Kaleemullah S/o Syed Mohammed, Aged about 33


years, Occ: Presently Unemployee, R/o 1-6-245,
Zamistanpur, Musherabad, Hyderabad.

… Petitioner/Accused No.1
AND

The State through P.S. Malkajgiri, Rachakonda


Commissionerate.
Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of M/s. Mohd. Muzaferullah Khan, Counsel for
Petitioner/Accused No.1 and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State;
upon perusal of the material papers on record and having stood over for
consideration, this court made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 214/2016 of Malkajgiri


Police Station registered under Section 498-A IPC and 3 and 4 of Dowry
Prohibition Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the defecto complaint who is the
wife of the petitioner lodged a written complaint before police on 14.11.2016
alleged that the petitioner is the husband of the defecto complainant and
their marriage took place about 6 years ago. The petitioner left to Dubai for
job purpose. The petitioner subjected the defecto complainant with physical
and mental for amount. On the basis of the said complaint police registered
a case and took up investigation.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional
public prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation in
to the case is not yet completed and there is every likelihood of the
petitioner leaving India if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in this crime. Further
if the petitioner is put in jail the same will definitely cause prejudice in the
mind of the petitioner at the time of cancelation talks. In view of above
circumstances the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is
and the petitioner is directed to surrender himself before X Metropolitan
Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 01.07.2017 and on his surrender the
petitioner / accused is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution of a
bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the
satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri. The petitioner / accused
is directed to appear before Inspector of police Malkajgiri police station on
every Sunday between 8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until further orders.

The petitioners/ accused shall make himself available for interrogation


by the investigation officer as and when required. Further the petitioner is
directed not to leave the country without the permission of the trial court.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 9th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to:
X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF JUNE, 2016

Crl. M.P. No. 2080 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 201 OF 2017 of
Naredmet Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

1. Smt Kallem Padmavathi W/o Kallem Krishna Reddy


Aged 53 years, Occ: House wife,

2. Kallem Krishna Reddy S/o late K.Sai Reddy, Aged 60


years, Occ: Business.

Both are R/o 8-8-120, Green Park Colony, Road No. 17,
Karmanghat, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District.

… Petitioner/Accused No.2 and 3


AND

The State through S.H.O. Naredmet,


Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of M/s. M.Yadagiri Reddy, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused No.2
and 3 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the
material papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this
court made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioners is the accused Nos.2 and respectively in Crime No.


201/2017 of Naredmet Police Station registered under Section 498-A IPC
and 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the father of the defecto complaint
lodged a written complaint before police alleged that the accused No.1 is a
husband of B.Navya the daughter of the defector complainant and their
marriage took place on 27.11.2015. The petitioner No.1 is the father and the
petitioner No.2 is the mother of the accused No.1 the defector complainant
gave a sum of Rs. 20 lakhs, towards dowry at the time of Lagnapathrika.
The defector complainant gave 60 tulas of gold ornaments and 2 and half
KGS silver towards dowry. The petitioners and accused No.1 insisted the
defecto complainant and his daughter to transfer the property in the name
of the accused No.1. The accused No.1 went to Australia. The sister and
brother in law of the accused No.1 assaulted the defacto complainant. The
accused No.1 and petitioners subjected the defecto complainant to mental
and physical cruelty. On the basis of the complaint police registered a case
and took up investigation.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional


public prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation in
to the case is not yet completed and there is every likelihood of the
petitioners leaving India if enlarged on bail.

5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required in this crime. Both
petitioners are aged persons. Most of the investigation in to the case has
been completed. Under the above circumstances the request of the
petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is considered and the petitioners
accused Nos. 2 and 3 are ordered to be surrender themselves before XX
Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 01.07.2017 and on their
surrender the petitioners / accused No.2 and 3 are ordered to be enlarged
on bail on their execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with two
sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Malkajgiri. The petitioners / accused No. 2 and 3 are directed to appear
before Inspector of police Naredmet police station on every Sunday between
8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until further orders.

The petitioners / accused No. 2 and 3 shall make themselves available


for interrogation by the investigation officer as and when required.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 9th day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to:
XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2062 of2017


in
Crime. No. 363 OF 2017 of
Naredment Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

A2) Shaw Sai Vandana, D/o Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, Age 23


years, Occ: Pvt Employee, R/o Plot No. 578, Vishwakarma
Colony, Surarm Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Hyderabad.

A3) B.Vijaylaxmi, W/o B.Jagan Mohan Rao, Age 57 years, Occ:


House wife, R/o Plot No. 80, 83, Flat No. 403, Sri Siddi
Residency, East Gandhinagar, Rampally X Road, Keesara
Mandal, R.R.District.
… Petitioner/Accused Nos. 2 and 3
AND

The State of Telangana through P.S. Naredment, Rachakonda


Commissionerate.

… Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri Sardar Harjeet Singh, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused Nos. 2
and 3 and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the
material papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court
made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.

2. The petitioners are the accused Nos. 2 and 3 respectively in Crime No.
363/2017 of Naredment Police Station registered under Section 306 R/w 34 of IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the wife of the accused
No.1 and they got married secretly. By knowing the same the family members of
the deceased and accused No.1 decided to perform marriage in a grand manner
and both sides fixed the date of marriage as 07.05.2017. Subsequently the accused
No.1 started avoiding the deceased and her family members and the deceased and
his family members filed a complaint before police as whereabouts of the accused
No.1 were not known to them. The family members of the deceased came to know
that the accused No.1 married the petitioner No.1 and since then the deceased in to
depression. On 13.05.2017 the deceased committed suicide by hanging and put an
end to her life. The father of the deceased lodged a complaint before police and
police registered a case. During the course of investigation police arrested the
petitioners and accused No.1 and produced them before court for judicial custody.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail on the ground
that investigation in to the case is still pending.

6. Perused the case records. The petitioners are women. The petitioner No.1 is
in judicial custody from 27.05.2017 and the petitioner No. 2 is in judicial custody
from 26.05.2017. The allegation against the petitioner No.1 is that the petitioner
NO.1 marred the accused No.1 by knowing relationship of the deceased with the
accused No.1. As seen from the case records it is clear that most of the
investigation in to the case as far as the petitioners are concerned is completed. In
view of this and as the petitioners are women, the request of the petitioners for
grant of bail is considered and the petitioners/accused Nos. 2 and 3 are ordered to
be enlarged on bail on their execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- each with
two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, R.R. District.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 8th day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
To

XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad, Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-Cum-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF JUNE, 2017

Crl. M.P. No. 2061 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 18 OF 2017 of
Keesara Police Station

Between:

A1: Rama Umadevi Wo Late Sri. R.Sudarshan, Aged about 60


years, R/o Flat NO. 90, Vinayaknagar Colony, Hafeezpet,
Keesara, Hyderabad-500049.

… Petitioner/Accused No. 1
AND

The State through P.S.Keesara, Rachakonda R.R. District


through Public Prosecutor.
Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri A.P.Suresh, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused No.1 Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material papers on
record and having stood over for consideration, this court made the
following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioners are the accused No.1 in Crime No.18 of 2017 of Keesara
Police Station registered under Sections 420, 506 IPC.

3. The petitioner along with accused No.2 filed Crl.MP.No. 829/2017 in this
crime for grant of anticipatory bail. As per orders of this court dated 20.03.2017
Crl.MP.NO. 829/2017 is allowed and the petitioner and accused No.2 are directed to
surrender themselves before X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri on
or before 03.04.2017 and on their surrender the petitioner and accused No.2 are
ordered to be enlarged on bail on their execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.
25,000/- with two sureties for a like sum.

4. In the present petition the petitioner is stating that the petitioner could not
get the flight tickets prior to the last date of surrender as per the orders of this
court and as such the petitioner could not surrendered before the court as per the
orders of this court passed in Crl.M.P.No. 829/2017 with this the petitioner
requested the court to extend the time for surrender of the petitioner before X
Metropolitan Magistrate.
5. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public
prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground the investigation into the case is not
yet completed.

6. Perused the case diary. The case of the prosecution is that on 13.1.2017 the
defeacto complainant lodged a written complaint before police stating that the
petitioner is the wife and the accused No.2 is the Son of Rama Sudarshan. Rama
Sudarshan approached the defacto complainant and 22 other persons and
informed that he is constructing apartments and collected Rs.15,00,000/- from
each during the year 2007-2008. After that Ramasudarshan did not start any
constructions work except laying one slab and some pillars. On 14.6.2016
Ramasudarshan expired. When the defacto complainant and others approached the
petitioner and the accused No.2, they threatened the defacto compliant and others
with dire consequences. Thus Ramasudharshan and the petitioner and her son
cheated the defacto complainant by collecting a sum of Rs.3,55,00,000/-. on the
basis of the said complaint police registered a case and took up investigation.

7. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the custodial investigation of the
petitioners is not required at this stage. This court granted anticipatory bail to the
petitioner in Crl.MP.No. 829/2017 dated 20.03.2017 and directed the petitioner to
surrender before X Metropolitan Magistrate on or before 03.04.2017. Considering
the circumstances stated by the petitioner for her not surrendering before court on
or before 03.04.2017, this court feels that it is just and necessary to extend the
time for surrender of the petitioner before X Metropolitan Magistrate and the
request of the petitioner in this petition is considered and the petitioner accused
No.1 is directed to surrender herself before X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at
Malkajgiri on or before 29.06.2017 and on her surrender the petitioner is ordered to
be enlarged on bail on execution of a bound for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two
sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malakajgiri.

The petitioner is further directed to make herself available as and when


required by the Investigation Officer for any investigation purpose in this crime.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 8th day of June,
2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to:
X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JUNE, 2016

Crl. M.P. No. 1911 OF 2017


in
Crime. No. 283 OF 2017 of
Malkajgiri Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 438 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Ropak Anil Kumar S/o Raghunandan Reddy, Age 37 years,


Occ: Business, R/o H.No. 11-8-225/2, Sai Krishna Nagar,
Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District.

… Petitioner/Accused No. 3
AND

The State through P.S.


Malkajgiri, Rachakonda Commissionerate.
Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of M/s.O.Lakshminarasimham, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused
No.3 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the
material papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this
court made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.3 in Crime No. 283/2017 of Malkajgiri


Police Station registered under Section 420 R /w 34 IPC .

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 20.04.2017 the defacto


complainant Venkata Subbarao lodged a written complaint before police
stating that the accused No.1 who is a lady approached the defacto
complainant and made the defacto complainant to believe that the accused
No.1 is a traditional and god fearing woman. The accused No.1 approached
the defacto complainant that the accused No.1 will give gold 20 % lesser
than market value. On that the defacto complainant invested Rs.
10,00,000/-. Subsequently the accused No.1 returned the amount to the
defacto complainant by stating that profits will be given afterwards. The
defacto complainant impressed on the accused No. 1 and collected amount
of Rs. 71,00,000/- and invested the said amount with the accused No.1.
After receiving the amount the accused No.1 was not in contact with the
defacto complainant and the defacto complainant came to know that the
accused No.1 cheated other persons also up to the tune of amount of Rs. 4.5
cores. The defacto complainant stated in his complaint that the defacto
complainant suspecting the petitioner and accused Nos.2, 4, 5 to 8 also in
the commission of the offence. Basing on the complaint of the defacto
complainant police registered a case and took up investigation. Similar cases
were registered against the accused No.1 and accused No.1 was arrested in
other crime and was also remanded in this crime.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional


public prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation in
to the case is not yet completed.

5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
police took the custody of accused No.1 from Judicial custody for
investigation of this crime. There are no specific overacts against the
petitioner in the complaint. The main allegation is against accused No.1.
Since the most of the investigation in to case is completed and as the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in this crime, the
request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is considered and the
petitioner/ Accused No.3 is ordered to surrender himself before X
Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 15.06.2017 and on his
surrender the petitioner / accused No.3 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on
his execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties for a like
sum to the satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri. The
petitioner / accused No.3 is directed to appear before Inspector of police
Malkajgiri police station on every Sunday between 8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until
further orders.

The petitioner / accused No.3 shall make himself available for


interrogation by the instigation officer as and when required.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 1st day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
Copy to:
X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE

RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI

PRESENT : SRI T. VENKATESWARA REDDY,


XVI ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE,
CYBERABAD, AT MALKAJGIRI.

DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JUNE , 2017

Crl. M.P.No. 2042 of2017


in
Crime. No. 98 OF 2017 of
Malkajgiri Police Station

(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)


Between:

Mohd Khayam S/o Late Mohd Jani, Age 35 years, Occ:


Plumber, R/o H.No. 4-242/6, Hanuman Nagar, RTC Colony,
Moulali, Malkajgiri, R.R.District.
… Petitioner/Accused.
AND

The State of Telangana through


P.S. Malkajgiri,Cyberabad.
… Respondent/Complainant

This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the


presence of Sri P.Sudheer Kumar, Counsel for Petitioner/Accused and
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material
papers on record and having stood over for consideration, this court
made the following:

ORDER

1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 98/2017 of Malkajgiri Police


Station registered under Section 498A and 306 IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the wife of the
petitioner. On 02.02.2017 Sub inspector of police recorded the statement of
the deceased who was suffering with burnt injuries and who was undergoing
treatment at Gandhi Hospital. In the oral statement the deceased stated that
the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and the petitioner is edicted to
alcohol and subjected the deceased to cruelty and the petitioner ignored his
two minor children. On 02.02.2017 the petitioner came in a drunken
condition and assaulted the deceased. The deceased poured kerosene on her
and set herself to fire. On the basis of the statement of the deceased police
registered a case and took up investigation. During the course of
investigation on 28.03.2017 police arrested the petitioner and produced the
petitioner before court for judicial custody.

4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel.

5. Perused the case diary. As seen from the case diary it is clear that
entire investigation into the case has been completed. In view of this
circumstance, the request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and
the petitioner/accused is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution of a
bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the
satisfaction of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, R.R.
District.

Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 1st day of


June, 2017.

XVI Additional District & Sessions


Judge-Cum-XVI Additional Metropolitan
Sessions Judge, R.R. District at Malkajgiri.
To

X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad, Malkajgiri.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen