Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Petitioner/Accused No.1
AND
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 524 of 2007 of Malkajgiri
Police Station registered under Sections 379, 356, 400 and 402 of IPC. This case
has been registerd as S.C. No. 58 of 2017.
5. Perused the case records. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from
17.12.2016. The police has not taken any action to remand the petitioner in other
crimes in which the petitioner is involved. There is no explanation from the side of
Addl. Public Prosecutor as to why the concerned police has not taken any action for
remand of the petitioner in other crimes in which he involved. Considering the facts
and circumstances of the case and as the sessions case is coming for framing of
charges the request of the petitioner/accused No.1 for grant of bail is considered
and the petitioner/accused No.1 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution
of a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two sureties
for a like sum to the satisfaction of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at
Malkajgiri, R.R. District.
Copy to
(P.S. Malkajgiri)
ORDER
This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of
anticipatory bail.
Station registered under Sections 354, 323, 452 and 420 IPC.
complaint filed by the defecto complainant before court which was forwarded to
police by the court. It is alleged in the complaint that the petitioner borrowed a sum
of Rs. 10,00,000/- on 29.08.2014 from defecto complainant and failed to repay the
same. To discharge the said amount the petitioner issued two cheques on
07.09.2015 for a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- but the said cheques were dishonored for
the reason of funds insufficient in the account of the petitioner. The defecto
complainant filed a criminal case under section 138 of NI Act against the petitioner
and the same is pending. On 08.11.2015 the petitioner trespassed in to the house
of the defecto complainant and threatened the defecto complainant and assaulted
the defecto complainant and when the wife of the defecto complainant intervened
5. Perused the case diary. As seen from the case diary and the contents of the
complaint it is clear that the custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required
in this crime. Hence the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is
event of his arrest on his execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two
sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Inspector of police Malkajgiri police
station.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 29th day of June
2017.
Copy to
SHO Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
(P.S. Kushaiguda)
ORDER
This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of
anticipatory bail.
lodged a complaint before of police stating that the defecto complainant running
cable TV Network and the defecto complainant appointed the accused No.1 for
collection of amount from the cable customers. The accused No.1 failed to give the
collection amount to the defecto complainant and the accused No.1 forcibly
collecting amounts from the customers from the month of April 2017 onwards. On
the basis of the said complaint police registered a case and took up investigation.
During the course of investigation police arrested the accused No.1 on 06.06.2017
and produced the accused No.1 for judicial custody. During the course of
investigation it is revealed that the petitioner and the accused No.1 colluded
5. Perused the case diary. In this crime the accused No.1 was already enlarged
on bail. As seen from the case records it is clear that most of the investigation in to
the case has been completed. Further the custodial investigation of the petitioner is
not required in this crime at this stage. Hence the request of the petitioner for grant
enlarged on bail on his execution of bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two
Malkajgiri.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 29th day of June
2017.
Copy to
(P.S. Kushaiguda)
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND
ORDER
This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of
anticipatory bail.
that the defecto complainant approached the accused No.1 for purchase of bottle
filling, Caping, Shrink sleeves machine and advanced a sum of Rs. 16,62,500/- on
23.12.2016. The petitioner failed to supply the machine and agreed to return the
amount. The petitioner returned only Rs. 5,00,000/- to the defecto complaint and
failed to return the balance amount of Rs. 11,62,500/-. On basis of the complaint
5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner approached the Hon’ble High Court
for quash of proceedings in Crime No. 383/2017 and also asked the court for stay
station. The Hon’ble High Court passed orders in Criminal Petition No. 4139/2017
and also in Crl.MP.No. 3984/2017 and in the said orders the Hon’ble High Court
rejected the plea of the petitioner for stay of further proceedings including arrest in
Crime No. 383/2017 of Kushaiguda Police station and the Hon’ble High Court
directed the Station House Officer Kushaiguda Police Station to follow the procedure
as contemplated under section 41 A of Cr. P.C. Since the Hon’ble High Court has
not considered the request of the petitioner for stay of all further proceedings
Station, under orders dated 08.06.2017 in Crl. Petition No. 4139/2017 and in
Crl.MP.No. 3984/2017, the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 29th day of June
2017.
(P.S. Naredmet)
… Petitioner/Accused No.2.
AND
ORDER
This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of
bail.
2. The petitioner is the accused No. 2 in crime No. 399/2017 of Naredmet Police
Station registered under Sections 370-A(2), 420, 468, 47, 474 IPC and under
Foreigners Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.05.2017 the petitioner and other
accused brought the victim lady to defence colony to hand over to the customer for
doing prostitution. Inspector of police arrested the petitioner and other accused and
in to contact with other accused who are also involved organizing prostitution. The
petitioner and accused procured the victim lady and uploaded her photos and
mobile number in website and they received message from customer and to hand
over the victim lady to customer the petitioner and other accused went to defence
colony along with victim lady and on information Inspector of Police arrested the
petitioner and other accused and registered a case and took up investigation. The
further case of the prosecution is that the accused No.1 directed the other accused
5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from
27.05.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear most of the investigation into
the case has been completed. Hence, the request of the petitioner for grant of bail
her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to
Malkajgiri.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 22nd day of June,
2017.
(P.S.Kushaiguda)
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
Police Station registered under Sections 370-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of
police along with his staff checking the vehicles at Radhika Cross Roads found two
male persons and one female travelling in a taxi car. On seeing the police the said
persons tried to escape from the police. Inspector of police apprehended the said
persons and on examination they disclosed their names as accused Nos. 2 and 3.
The accused Nos. 2 and 3 voluntarily confessed that they are working under Sai
baba Goud (A1) who is organizing on line prostitution network . The accused No.1
instructed the petitioner and Accused No.2 to drop the victim at Kushaiguda area
where the customer is residing. Inspector of police registered a case and took up
investigation and produced the petitioner and accused No.2 before court for judicial
custody.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public
prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the petitioner may involve in
5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from
04.06.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioner is
concerned, most of the investigation into the case has been completed. Hence, the
request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner/accused
Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 22nd day of June,
2017.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the accused No.1 and the deceased
are cousins. The petitioner and accused Nos. 2 and 4 are associates of the
accused No.1. There was disputes between the accused No.1 and the
deceased. In pursuance of the preplan of the accused Nos. 1 and 2 on
28.12.2008 they took the deceased to Yapral and consumed liquor. The
accused Nos. 1 and 2 called the accused Nos. 3 and 4. The petitioner and
accused Nos. 1 and 2 committed murder of the deceased by strangulating
the deceased and thereafter the petitioner and other accused dumped the
dead body of the deceased in a railway track.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 796 of 2015 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is main organizer of brothel
house. On 31.10.2013 Inspector of police registered a case, investigated in to the
same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 559 of 2013 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found running brothel
house. On 02.10.2013 Inspector of police registered a case, investigated in to the
same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and accused No.2 took a
house on rental basis at Kakatiyanagar, and started running brothel house in the
said premises. On 30.01.2015 Inspector of police registered a case, investigated in
to the same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 717 of 2015 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and accused No.2 are
organizers of brothel house and on 13.10.2015 Inspector of police registered a
case, investigated in to the same and filed the charge sheet against the petitioner
and other accused.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime No. 430 of 2015 of Kushaiguda
Police Station registered under Section 370 A of IPC and sections 3,4 & 5 of PITA
Act.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and accused No.1 are
running brothel house by procuring women from Vijayawada and West Bengal. On
12.09.2014 police registered a case against petitioner and other accused and after
investigation of the same, inspector of police Naredmet police station filed charge
sheet against the petitioner and accused.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.2 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
Copy to
(P.S.Neredmet)
( PRC 3/2016 on the file of XX Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Malakjgiri)
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved in other crimes and there is
every possibility of the petitioner absconding again if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case diary. Since investigation in to the case has been completed
and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 29.04.2017, the request of the
petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is
ordered to be enlarged on bail on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-
with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate at
Malkajgiri.
Copy to
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the wife of the petitioner
and they got married secretly. By knowing the same the family members of the
deceased and petitioner decided to perform marriage in a grand manner and both
sides fixed the date of marriage as 07.05.2017. Subsequently the petitioner
started avoiding the deceased and her family members and the deceased and his
family members filed a complaint before police as whereabouts of the petitioner
were not known to them. The family members of the deceased came to know that
the petitioner married the accused No.2 and since then the deceased went in to
depression. On 13.05.2017 the deceased committed suicide by hanging and put an
end to her life. The father of the deceased lodged a complaint before police and
police registered a case. During the course of investigation police arrested the
petitioner and other accused and produced them before court for judicial custody.
5. The Additional Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail on the ground
that investigation in to the case is still pending.
6. Perused the case records. the petitioner has been in judicial custody from
15.05.2017. The accused Nos. 2 and 3 have been enlarged on bail. As seen from
case record it is clear that most of the investigation in to the case has been
completed. Hence the request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and
the petitioner/accused No. 1 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution of
a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction
of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, R.R. District.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of June,
2017.
XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad, Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE-CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is the husband of the
deceased and their marriage took place on 24.05.2010. The petitioner
subjected the deceased to mental and physical cruelty and due to the
harassment of the petitioner the deceased committed suicide on 25.05.2017
On the complaint of the father of the deceased police registered a case and
took up investigation. During the course of investigation on 25.05.2017
police arrested the petitioner and produced the petitioner before court for
judicial custody.
Copy to
… Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND
… Respondent/Complainant
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant who is Deputy
Commissioner, GHMC, Malkajgiri, Circle 17 lodged a written complaint before court
alleging that as per the vigilance report the petitioner /accused No.1 who worked
as TSP in Malkajgiri Circle GHMC without verifying the nature of the land,
recommended the Dy. Commissioner, Malkajgiri circle for grant of building
permission for Government land and the accused No.2 allowed the party to make
constructions in the Government land. It is also found in the report that the
accused No.3 executed registered sale deeds without power to execute a registered
sale deed on behalf of Annapurna Housing Society and the accused No3.
fraudulently executed sale deeds. On the basis of the said complaint Inspector of
Police, Malkajgiri police station registered a case on 10.2.2017 and took up
investigation.
-2-
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The Addl. Public
Prosecutor seriously opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation into
the case is not yet completed and if the petitioner is granted bail the petitioner may
escape from the locality and may also destroy the evidence.
5. Perused the case diary. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in the present case. Hence
the request of the petitioner/ Accused No.1 for grant of anticipatory bail is
considered and the petitioner / accused No.1 is ordered to be surrender himself
before X Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad on or before 15.07.2017 and on his
surrender the petitioner / Accused No.1 is to be enlarged on bail on his execution of
a bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the
satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 16th day of June,
2017.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.
5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner is an advocate. As seen from the
case records it is clear that the custodial investigation of the petitioner is not
necessary at this stage in the present crime. Hence the request of the petitioner for
grant of anticipatory bail is considered and the petitioner/accused is ordered to be
enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest on his execution of a bond for a sum of
Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of Sub Inspector of
Police, Keesara Police Station.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 16th day of June,
2017.
Copy to
SHO Keesara
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
CUM-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI
… Petitioners/Accused 5 to 8.
AND
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.
2. The petitioners are the accused Nos. 5 to 8 respectively in Crime No. 586 of
2016 of Malkajgiri Police Station registered under Sections 332, 353, 504, 506 R/w
34 of IPC.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public
prosecutor opposed for grant of bail on the ground that investigation in to the case
is not completed.
5. Perused the case dairy. In this crime the accused Nos. 1 and 4 are granted
anticipatory bail. The accused No.2 is surrendered before court and subsequently
enlarged on bail. Since the custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required
in the present case and as the Investigation Officer has recorded the confessional
statement of the accused No.2, the request of the petitioners for grant of
anticipatory bail is considered and the petitioners / accused 5 to 8 are ordered to
be enlarged on bail in the event of their arrest on their execution of a bond for a
sum of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of Sub
Inspector of Police, Malkajgiri Police Station.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 15th day of June,
2017.
Cop to
SHO Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
for grant of anticipatory bail.
2. The petitioners are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively in Crime No.
383/2017 of Malkajgiri Police Station registered under Section 420 and 506
IPC.
5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case dairy it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required in the present crime
and hence the request of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is
considered and the petitioners / accused No.1 and 2 are ordered to be
enlarged on bail in the event of their arrest on their execution of a bond for
a sum of Rs. 5,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction
of Inspector of police, Malkajgiri police station.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 15th day of June,
2017.
SHO Malkajgiri.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-Cum-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT:: AT MALKAJGIRI
This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the presence of
Sri S.Yadaiah, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused No. 3 and Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material papers on record and having
stood over for consideration, this court made the following:
ORDER
This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for grant of
bail.
Station registered under Sections 370-A(2), 420, 468, 47, 474 IPC and under
Foreigners Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.05.2017 the petitioner and the
accused Nos.2,4 and 5 brought the victim lady to defence colony to hand over to
the customer for doing prostitution. Inspector of police arrested the petitioner and
accused No.2, 4 and 5 and on interrogation the petitioner revealed that the
women from different parts of India. The petitioner and other accused procured the
victim lady and uploaded her photos and mobile number in website and they
received message from customer and to hand over the victim lady to customer the
petitioner and accused Nos. 2 4 and 5 went to defence colony along with victim
lady and on information Inspector of Police arrested the petitioner and accused
No.2,4 and 5 and registered a case and took up investigation. The further case of
the prosecution is that the accused No.1 directed the petitioner and other accused
5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from
27.05.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioner is
concerned most of the investigation into the case has been completed. Hence, the
request of the petitioner / accused No.3 for grant of bail is considered and the
bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of
To
This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the presence of
Sri G.Laxmi Narsaiah, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused No. 2, 4 and 5 and Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material papers on record and
having stood over for consideration, this court made the following:
ORDER
This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of
bail.
2. The petitioners are the accused No. 2, 4 and 5 respectively in crime No.
399/2017 of Naredmet Police Station registered under Sections 370-A(2), 420, 468,
47, 474 IPC and under sections 4 and 5 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act and
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.05.2017 the petitioners and the
accused No.3 brought the victim lady to defence colony to hand over to the
customer for doing prostitution. Inspector of police arrested the petitioners and
accused No.3 and on interrogation he revealed that the petitioner No.1 is
Bangladesh National and he is regularly visiting India and the petitioner No.1 is
India. The petitioner No. 1came in to contact with petitioners 2 and 3 and other
accused who are also involved organizing prostitution. The petitioners procured the
victim lady and uploaded her photos and mobile number in website and they
received message from customer and to hand over the victim lady to customer the
petitioners and accused No.3 went to defence colony along with victim lady and on
information Inspector of Police arrested the petitioner and accused No.3 and
registered a case and took up investigation. The further case of the prosecution is
that the accused No.1 directed the other accused to take the victim lady to defence
colony.
5. Perused the case diary. The petitioners have been in judicial custody from
27.05.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioners 2
and 3 are concerned most of the investigation into the case has been completed.
Hence, the request of the petitioners 2 and 3 / accused 4 and 5 for grant of bail is
considered. In view of the allegation of the prosecution that the petitioner No.1 who
obtained Aadhar card and voter ID card fraudulently with fake name, the request of
the petitioner No.1 for grant of bail at this stage is not considered.
and 5 are ordered to be enlarged on bail, on their execution of a bond for a sum of
Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX
(P.S. Kushaiguda)
(Bail application filed U/s. 439 of Cr.P.C)
Between:
This petition coming on before me on this day for hearing in the presence of
Sri D.Satish Kumar, Counsel for Petitioners/Accused No. 2 and Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State; upon perusal of the material papers on record and having
stood over for consideration, this court made the following:
ORDER
This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for grant of
bail.
Police Station registered under Sections 370-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of
police along with his staff checking the vehicles at Radhika Cross Roads found two
male persons and one female travelling in a taxi car. On seeing the police the said
persons tried to escape from the police. Inspector of police apprehended the said
persons on examination they disclosed their names as accused Nos. 1to 3. The
accused Nos. 2 and 3 voluntarily confessed that they are working under Sai baba
Goud (A1) who is organizing constitution on line. The accused No.1 instructed the
petitioner and Accused No.2 drop the victim at Kushaiguda area where the
customer is residing. Inspector of police registered a case and perused the
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public
prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the petitioner may involved in
5. Perused the case diary. The petitioner has been in judicial custody from
04.06.2017. As seen from the case diary it is clear that as far as the petitioner is
concerned, most of the investigation into the case has been completed. Hence, the
request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and the petitioner/accused
Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX
To
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.
5. Perused the case dairy. The petitioner No.1 is the father and petitioner
No.2 is the mother of accused No.1. The defecto complainant is the daughter
in law of the petitioners. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required in this crime. Hence
the request of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is considered and
the petitioners are directed to surrender themselves before XX Metropolitan
Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 01.07.2017 and on their surrender the
petitioners / accused Nos. 2 and 3 are ordered to be enlarged on bail on his
execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties for a like
sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri. The
petitioners / accused Nos. 2 and are directed to appear before Inspector of
police Kushaiguda police station on every 1st Sunday of the month between
8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until further orders.
… Petitioner/Accused
AND
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the husband of the
petitioner and their marriage performed during the year 2009. The petitioner
gave birth to three children out of wedlock and all are minors. On
12.12.2016 the deceased and the petitioner quarreled and on that the
deceased committed suicide by setting herself to fire. Subsequently the
deceased died on 14.12.2016 while undergoing treatment. Initially police
registered a case under section 174 Cr.P.C and subsequently the section of
law is altered to section 306 IPC.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional
public prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation in
to the case is not yet completed.
5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in this crime. The
petitioner is lady and is having three minor children. No specific serious
allegations are alleged against the petitioner in the complaint. Under the
above circumstances the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory
bail is considered and the petitioner/ accused is ordered to be enlarged on
bail in the event of her arrest on her execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.
5,000 /- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of Inspector of
police, Neredmet police station.
SHO Neredmet.
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-
Cum-XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
… Petitioner/Accused No.1
AND
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the defecto complaint who is the
wife of the petitioner lodged a written complaint before police on 14.11.2016
alleged that the petitioner is the husband of the defecto complainant and
their marriage took place about 6 years ago. The petitioner left to Dubai for
job purpose. The petitioner subjected the defecto complainant with physical
and mental for amount. On the basis of the said complaint police registered
a case and took up investigation.
4. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional
public prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground that the investigation in
to the case is not yet completed and there is every likelihood of the
petitioner leaving India if enlarged on bail.
5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in this crime. Further
if the petitioner is put in jail the same will definitely cause prejudice in the
mind of the petitioner at the time of cancelation talks. In view of above
circumstances the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is
and the petitioner is directed to surrender himself before X Metropolitan
Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 01.07.2017 and on his surrender the
petitioner / accused is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution of a
bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the
satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri. The petitioner / accused
is directed to appear before Inspector of police Malkajgiri police station on
every Sunday between 8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until further orders.
Both are R/o 8-8-120, Green Park Colony, Road No. 17,
Karmanghat, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
for grant of anticipatory bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the father of the defecto complaint
lodged a written complaint before police alleged that the accused No.1 is a
husband of B.Navya the daughter of the defector complainant and their
marriage took place on 27.11.2015. The petitioner No.1 is the father and the
petitioner No.2 is the mother of the accused No.1 the defector complainant
gave a sum of Rs. 20 lakhs, towards dowry at the time of Lagnapathrika.
The defector complainant gave 60 tulas of gold ornaments and 2 and half
KGS silver towards dowry. The petitioners and accused No.1 insisted the
defecto complainant and his daughter to transfer the property in the name
of the accused No.1. The accused No.1 went to Australia. The sister and
brother in law of the accused No.1 assaulted the defacto complainant. The
accused No.1 and petitioners subjected the defecto complainant to mental
and physical cruelty. On the basis of the complaint police registered a case
and took up investigation.
5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required in this crime. Both
petitioners are aged persons. Most of the investigation in to the case has
been completed. Under the above circumstances the request of the
petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is considered and the petitioners
accused Nos. 2 and 3 are ordered to be surrender themselves before XX
Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 01.07.2017 and on their
surrender the petitioners / accused No.2 and 3 are ordered to be enlarged
on bail on their execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with two
sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Malkajgiri. The petitioners / accused No. 2 and 3 are directed to appear
before Inspector of police Naredmet police station on every Sunday between
8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until further orders.
… Respondent/Complainant
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
2. The petitioners are the accused Nos. 2 and 3 respectively in Crime No.
363/2017 of Naredment Police Station registered under Section 306 R/w 34 of IPC.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the wife of the accused
No.1 and they got married secretly. By knowing the same the family members of
the deceased and accused No.1 decided to perform marriage in a grand manner
and both sides fixed the date of marriage as 07.05.2017. Subsequently the accused
No.1 started avoiding the deceased and her family members and the deceased and
his family members filed a complaint before police as whereabouts of the accused
No.1 were not known to them. The family members of the deceased came to know
that the accused No.1 married the petitioner No.1 and since then the deceased in to
depression. On 13.05.2017 the deceased committed suicide by hanging and put an
end to her life. The father of the deceased lodged a complaint before police and
police registered a case. During the course of investigation police arrested the
petitioners and accused No.1 and produced them before court for judicial custody.
5. The Additional Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail on the ground
that investigation in to the case is still pending.
6. Perused the case records. The petitioners are women. The petitioner No.1 is
in judicial custody from 27.05.2017 and the petitioner No. 2 is in judicial custody
from 26.05.2017. The allegation against the petitioner No.1 is that the petitioner
NO.1 marred the accused No.1 by knowing relationship of the deceased with the
accused No.1. As seen from the case records it is clear that most of the
investigation in to the case as far as the petitioners are concerned is completed. In
view of this and as the petitioners are women, the request of the petitioners for
grant of bail is considered and the petitioners/accused Nos. 2 and 3 are ordered to
be enlarged on bail on their execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- each with
two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, R.R. District.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 8th day of June,
2017.
XX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad, Malkajgiri
IN THE COURT OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-Cum-
XVI ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE
RANGA REDDY DISTRICT :: AT MALKAJGIRI
Between:
… Petitioner/Accused No. 1
AND
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant
of anticipatory bail.
2. The petitioners are the accused No.1 in Crime No.18 of 2017 of Keesara
Police Station registered under Sections 420, 506 IPC.
3. The petitioner along with accused No.2 filed Crl.MP.No. 829/2017 in this
crime for grant of anticipatory bail. As per orders of this court dated 20.03.2017
Crl.MP.NO. 829/2017 is allowed and the petitioner and accused No.2 are directed to
surrender themselves before X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri on
or before 03.04.2017 and on their surrender the petitioner and accused No.2 are
ordered to be enlarged on bail on their execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.
25,000/- with two sureties for a like sum.
4. In the present petition the petitioner is stating that the petitioner could not
get the flight tickets prior to the last date of surrender as per the orders of this
court and as such the petitioner could not surrendered before the court as per the
orders of this court passed in Crl.M.P.No. 829/2017 with this the petitioner
requested the court to extend the time for surrender of the petitioner before X
Metropolitan Magistrate.
5. Heard the arguments submitted by both side Counsel. The additional public
prosecutor opposed for the bail on the ground the investigation into the case is not
yet completed.
6. Perused the case diary. The case of the prosecution is that on 13.1.2017 the
defeacto complainant lodged a written complaint before police stating that the
petitioner is the wife and the accused No.2 is the Son of Rama Sudarshan. Rama
Sudarshan approached the defacto complainant and 22 other persons and
informed that he is constructing apartments and collected Rs.15,00,000/- from
each during the year 2007-2008. After that Ramasudarshan did not start any
constructions work except laying one slab and some pillars. On 14.6.2016
Ramasudarshan expired. When the defacto complainant and others approached the
petitioner and the accused No.2, they threatened the defacto compliant and others
with dire consequences. Thus Ramasudharshan and the petitioner and her son
cheated the defacto complainant by collecting a sum of Rs.3,55,00,000/-. on the
basis of the said complaint police registered a case and took up investigation.
7. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the custodial investigation of the
petitioners is not required at this stage. This court granted anticipatory bail to the
petitioner in Crl.MP.No. 829/2017 dated 20.03.2017 and directed the petitioner to
surrender before X Metropolitan Magistrate on or before 03.04.2017. Considering
the circumstances stated by the petitioner for her not surrendering before court on
or before 03.04.2017, this court feels that it is just and necessary to extend the
time for surrender of the petitioner before X Metropolitan Magistrate and the
request of the petitioner in this petition is considered and the petitioner accused
No.1 is directed to surrender herself before X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at
Malkajgiri on or before 29.06.2017 and on her surrender the petitioner is ordered to
be enlarged on bail on execution of a bound for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two
sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad at Malakajgiri.
Written and pronounced by me in open court on this the 8th day of June,
2017.
… Petitioner/Accused No. 3
AND
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for
grant of anticipatory bail.
5. Perused the case dairy. As seen from the case diary it is clear that the
police took the custody of accused No.1 from Judicial custody for
investigation of this crime. There are no specific overacts against the
petitioner in the complaint. The main allegation is against accused No.1.
Since the most of the investigation in to case is completed and as the
custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required in this crime, the
request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is considered and the
petitioner/ Accused No.3 is ordered to surrender himself before X
Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri on or before 15.06.2017 and on his
surrender the petitioner / accused No.3 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on
his execution of a bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties for a like
sum to the satisfaction of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri. The
petitioner / accused No.3 is directed to appear before Inspector of police
Malkajgiri police station on every Sunday between 8.00 AM to 11.00 AM until
further orders.
ORDER
1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the wife of the
petitioner. On 02.02.2017 Sub inspector of police recorded the statement of
the deceased who was suffering with burnt injuries and who was undergoing
treatment at Gandhi Hospital. In the oral statement the deceased stated that
the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and the petitioner is edicted to
alcohol and subjected the deceased to cruelty and the petitioner ignored his
two minor children. On 02.02.2017 the petitioner came in a drunken
condition and assaulted the deceased. The deceased poured kerosene on her
and set herself to fire. On the basis of the statement of the deceased police
registered a case and took up investigation. During the course of
investigation on 28.03.2017 police arrested the petitioner and produced the
petitioner before court for judicial custody.
5. Perused the case diary. As seen from the case diary it is clear that
entire investigation into the case has been completed. In view of this
circumstance, the request of the petitioner for grant of bail is considered and
the petitioner/accused is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his execution of a
bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the
satisfaction of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, R.R.
District.
X Metropolitan Magistrate,
Cyberabad, Malkajgiri.