Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

Felicific calculus

The felicific calculus is an algorithm


formulated by utilitarian philosopher
Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) for
calculating the degree or amount of
pleasure that a specific action is likely to
cause. Bentham, an ethical hedonist,
believed the moral rightness or wrongness
of an action to be a function of the amount
of pleasure or pain that it produced. The
felicific calculus could, in principle at least,
determine the moral status of any
considered act. The algorithm is also
known as the utility calculus, the
hedonistic calculus and the hedonic
calculus.

To be included in this calculation are


several variables (or vectors), which
Bentham called "circumstances". These
are:

1. Intensity: How strong is the pleasure?


2. Duration: How long will the pleasure
last?
3. Certainty or uncertainty: How likely or
unlikely is it that the pleasure will
occur?
4. Propinquity or remoteness: How soon
will the pleasure occur?
5. Fecundity: The probability that the
action will be followed by sensations
of the same kind.
6. Purity: The probability that it will not
be followed by sensations of the
opposite kind.
7. Extent: How many people will be
affected?

Bentham's instructions
To take an exact account of the general
tendency of any act, by which the interests
of a community are affected, proceed as
follows. Begin with any one person of
those whose interests seem most
immediately to be affected by it: and take
an account,

Of the value of each distinguishable


pleasure which appears to be produced
by it in the first instance.
Of the value of each pain which appears
to be produced by it in the first instance.
Of the value of each pleasure which
appears to be produced by it after the
first. This constitutes the fecundity of
the first pleasure and the impurity of the
first pain.
Of the value of each pain which appears
to be produced by it after the first. This
constitutes the fecundity of the first
pain, and the impurity of the first
pleasure.
Sum up all the values of all the
pleasures on the one side, and those of
all the pains on the other. The balance, if
it be on the side of pleasure, will give the
good tendency of the act upon the
whole, with respect to the interests of
that individual person; if on the side of
pain, the bad tendency of it upon the
whole.
Take an account of the number of
persons whose interests appear to be
concerned; and repeat the above
process with respect to each. Sum up
the numbers expressive of the degrees
of good tendency, which the act has,
with respect to each individual, in regard
to whom the tendency of it is good upon
the whole. Do this again with respect to
each individual, in regard to whom the
tendency of it is bad upon the whole.
Take the balance which if on the side of
pleasure, will give the general good
tendency of the act, with respect to the
total number or community of
individuals concerned; if on the side of
pain, the general evil tendency, with
respect to the same community.[1]

To make his proposal easier to remember,


Bentham devised what he called a
"mnemonic doggerel" (also referred to as
"memoriter verses"), which synthesized
"the whole fabric of morals and
legislation":

Intense, long, certain, speedy,


fruitful, pure—

Such marks in pleasures and in


pains endure.
Such pleasures seek if private be
thy end:
If it be public, wide let them
extend
Such pains avoid, whichever be
thy view:

If pains must come, let them


extend to few.

Hedons and dolors


The units of measurements used in the
felicific calculus may be termed hedons
and dolors.[2] They may be regarded as
similar to the utilitarian posends and
negends.
See also
Ethical calculus
Science of morality
Act Utilitarianism

References
1. * Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to
the Principles of Morals and
Legislation, London, 1789
2. San Diego University – Glossary
Archived May 9, 2008, at the Wayback
Machine by Lawrence M. Hinman
Retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Felicific_calculus&oldid=883934095"

Last edited 4 months ago by ClueBo…

Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless


otherwise noted.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen