Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Substitution Effects
THE IMPACT OF A PRICE CHANGE
• Economists often separate the impact of a
price change into two components:
– the substitution effect; and
– the income effect.
THE IMPACT OF A PRICE CHANGE
• The substitution effect involves the substitution of
good x1 for good x2 or vice-versa due to a change in
relative prices of the two goods.
• The income effect results from an increase or
decrease in the consumer’s real income or
purchasing power as a result of the price change.
• The sum of these two effects is called the price
effect.
THE IMPACT OF A PRICE CHANGE
• The decomposition of the price effect into the
income and substitution effect can be done in
several ways
• There are two main methods:
(i) The Hicksian method; and
(ii) The Slutsky method
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
• Sir John R.Hicks (1904-1989)
• Awarded the Nobel Laureate in Economics
(with Kenneth J. Arrrow) in 1972 for work
on general equilibrium theory and welfare
economics.
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
Optimal bundle is Ea, on indifference curve I1.
X2
Ea
I1
xa
X1
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
A fall in the price of X1
X2 The budget line pivots out from P
*
P
Ea
I1
xa
X1
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
The new optimum is Eb on I2.
X2 The Total Price Effect is xa to xb
Eb
Ea I2
I1
xa xb
X1
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
• To isolate the substitution effect we ask….
“what would the consumer’s optimal bundle be if
s/he faced the new lower price for X1 but
experienced no change in real income?”
• This amounts to returning the consumer to the
original indifference curve (I1)
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
The new optimum is Eb on I2.
X2 The Total Price Effect is xa to xb
Eb
Ea I2
I1
xa xb
X1
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
Draw a line parallel to the new budget line
X2 and tangent to the old indifference curve
Eb
Ea I2
I1
xa xb
X1
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
The new optimum on I1 is at Ec. The movement
X2 from Ea to Ec (the increase in quantity
demanded from Xa to Xc) is solely in response
to a change in relative prices
Eb
Ea I2
Ec I1
xa xc xb
X1
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
This is the substitution effect.
X2
Eb
Ea I2
Ec
I1
X1
Xa Substitution Effect Xc
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
• To isolate the income effect …
• Look at the remainder of the total price effect
• This is due to a change in real income.
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
The remainder of the total effect is due to a
change in real income. The increase in real
X2 income is evidenced by the movement from I1
to I2
Eb
Ea I2
Ec
I1
X1
Xc Income Effect
Xb
THE HICKSIAN METHOD
X2
Eb
Ea I2
Ec
I1
xa xc xb
X1
Sub Effect
IncomeEff
ect
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
• Eugene Slutsky (1880-1948)
• Russian economist expelled from the
University of Kiev for participating in
student revolts.
• In his 1915 paper, “On the theory of the
Budget of the Consumer” he introduced
“Slutsky Decomposition”.
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
Optimal bundle is Ea, on indifference curve I1.
X2
Ea
I1
xa
X1
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
A fall in the price of X1
X2 The budget line pivots out from P
*
P
Ea
I1
xa
X1
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
The new optimum is Eb on I2.
X2 The Total Price Effect is xa to xb
Eb
Ea I2
I1
xa xb
X1
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
• Slutsky claimed that if, at the new prices,
– less income is needed to buy the original bundle
then “real income” has increased
– more income is needed to buy the original
bundle then “real income” has decreased
• Slutsky isolated the change in demand due only to
the change in relative prices by asking “What is the
change in demand when the consumer’s income is
adjusted so that, at the new prices, s/he can just
afford to buy the original bundle?”
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
• To isolate the substitution effect we adjust the
consumer’s money income so that s/he
change can just afford the original
consumption bundle.
• In other words we are holding purchasing
power constant.
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
The new optimum is Eb on I2.
X2 The Total Price Effect is xa to xb
Eb
Ea I2
I1
xa xb
X1
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
Draw a line parallel to the new
X2 budget line which passes through
the point Ea.
Eb
Ea I2
I1
xa xb
X1
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
The new optimum on I3 is at Ec. The
movement from Ea to Ec is the
X2 substitution effect
Eb
Ea I2
Ec
I3
xa xc xb
X1
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
The new optimum on I3 is at Ec. The
movement from Ea to Ec is the
X2 substitution effect
Eb
Ea I2
Ec
I3
xa xc
X1
Substitution Effect
THE SLUTSKY METHOD
The remainder of the total price
effect is the Income Effect.
X2 The movement from Ec to Eb.
Eb
Ea I2
Ec
I3
xc xb
X1
Income Effect
THE SLUTSKY METHOD for NORMAL GOODS
Eb
Ea I2
Ec
I3
xa xc xb
X1
THE SLUTSKY METHOD for NORMAL GOODS
Short term
Long- term
Classification of goods
- consumer
- durable
- consumer goods and services
Factors
Forecasting at different levels
– Macro
– Industrial
– Firm-level
Purposes of forecasting
Plausibility
Simplicity
Economy
Availability
Durability
Methods of demand forecasting
Survey or buyer’s intention Smoothing techniques
Expert opinion
Use of economic indicators
Collective opinion
Controlled experiments
Naïve models
Judgmental approach
• There are several methods and techniques available
for forecasting demand for a product. All the
methods have their own limitations and advantages,
merits and demerits, in varying degrees. The
applicability and usefulness of a method depends on
the purpose of forecasting and availability of reliable
and relevant data. The analyst should, therefore,
choose a method or a technique of demand
forecasting which is relevant to the purpose,
convenient to handle, applicable to the available data
and also inexpensive.
Survey or buyers method
Direct method of estimating sales in the near future
Survey methods
- experts opinion
- consumer survey
- complete enumeration
- sample survey
- end- use
- Delphi method
Methods of demand forecasting
- market experimentation
- stimulated market method
- actual market method
Statistical method
- trend analysis
- heading indicator analysis
- regression method
- simultaneous equation
Survey Methods
•Total Product
•Marginal Product
•Average Product
Production in the Short Run
• Total product (TP) is another name for output
in the short run.
• The marginal product (MP) of a variable input
is the change in output (or TP) resulting from
a one unit change in the input.
• MP tells us how output changes as we change
the level of the input by one unit.
Production in the Short Run
• The average product (AP) of an input is the
total product divided by the level of the input.
• AP tells us, on average, how many units of
output are produced per unit of input used.
Production in the Short Run
• Consider the two input production function Q=f(X,Y)
in which input X is variable and input Y is fixed at
some level.
• The marginal product of input X is defined as
holding input Y constant.
Q
MPX
X
Production in the Short Run
• The average product of input X is defined as
Q
APX
X
Production in the Short Run
The table below represents a firm’s production function,
Q=f(X,Y):
Units of Y
Employed Output Quantity (Q)
8 37 60 83 96 107 117 127 128
7 42 64 78 90 101 110 119 120
6 37 52 64 73 82 90 97 104
5 31 47 58 67 75 82 89 95
4 24 39 52 60 67 73 79 85
3 17 29 41 52 58 64 69 73
2 8 18 29 39 47 52 56 52
1 4 8 14 20 27 24 21 17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Units of X Employed
Production in the Short Run
In the short run, let Y=2. The row highlighted below
represents the firm’s short run production function.
Units of Y
Employed Output Quantity (Q)
8 37 60 83 96 107 117 127 128
7 42 64 78 90 101 110 119 120
6 37 52 64 73 82 90 97 104
5 31 47 58 67 75 82 89 95
4 24 39 52 60 67 73 79 85
3 17 29 41 52 58 64 69 73
2 8 18 29 39 47 52 56 52
1 4 8 14 20 27 24 21 17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Units of X Employed
Production in the Short Run
Variable
Input Total Product
• Rewriting this row, we (X) (Q or TP)
can create the
0 0
following table and
calculate values of 1 8
marginal and average 2 18
product. 3 29
4 39
5 47
6 52
7 56
8 52
Calculation of Marginal Product
Variable Marginal
Input Total Product Product
(X) (Q or TP) (MP)
0 0 Q 8
ΔX=1 ΔQ=8 8
1 8 X 1
2 18
3 29
4 39
5 47
6 52
7 56
8 52
Calculation of Marginal Product
Variable Marginal
Input Total Product Product
(X) (Q or TP) (MP)
0 0
8
1 8 10
2 18 11
3 29
10
4 39 8
5 47 Q 5
ΔX=1 ΔQ=5 X 1 5
6 52
7 56 4
-4
8 52
Calculation of Average Product
Variable Total Average
Input Product Product
(X) (Q or TP) (AP)
0 0 ---
Q 88
1
1 8
8 8
X 1
1
2 18
3 29
4 39
5 47
6 52
7 56
8 52
Calculation of Average Product
Variable Total Average
Input Product Product
(X) (Q or TP) (AP)
0 0 ---
1 8 8
2 18 9
3 29 9,67
4 39 9,75
5 47 9,4
6 52 8,67
7 56 8
8 52 6,5
Production in the Short Run
• The figures
illustrate TP, MP,
and AP
graphically.
Production in the Short Run
• If MP is positive then TP is
increasing.
• If MP is negative then TP
is decreasing.
• TP reaches a maximum
when MP=0
Production in the Short Run
• If MP > AP then AP is
rising.
• If MP < AP then AP is
falling.
• MP=AP when AP is
maximized.
The Law of Diminishing Returns
• Definition
– As additional units of a variable input are
combined with a fixed input, at some point the
additional output (i.e., marginal product) starts to
diminish.
Diminishing Returns
Variable Marginal
Input Total Product Product
(X) (Q or TP) (MP)
0 0 8
1 8 10 Diminishing
2 18 11 Returns
3 29 10 Begins
4 39 8 Here
5 47
6 52 5
7 56 4
8 52 -4
The Law of Diminishing
Returns
• Reasons
Increasing Returns
Teamwork and Specialization
MP Diminishing Returns Begins
Fewer opportunities for teamwork
and specialization
X
MP
The Three Stages of Production
• Stage I
– From zero units of the variable input to where AP
is maximized
• Stage II
– From the maximum AP to where MP=0
• Stage III
– From where MP=0 on
The Three Stages of Production
Technology advancement
C
Q
100
B O3
A
50 O2
O1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 L
Production in the Long Run
3
A B C
2
Q3 =90
D Q2 =75
1
Q1 =55
1 2 3 4 5 L
Marginal rate of technical
substitution (MRTS)
K
7
6 ΔK=3
5
MRTS K
4
ΔL=1
L
3 ΔK=1
ΔL=1
1 ΔK=1/3
ΔL=1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L
Perfect Substitution
K
Q1 Q2 Q3
0 C
L
No substitution (Leontief isoquants)
K
C
Q3
B
Q2
K1 A
Q1
0
L1 L
Production in the Long Run
£5
D = elastic
Kinked D Curve
D = Inelastic
100 Quantity
Market Structure
• Market structure – identifies how a market
is made up in terms of:
– The number of firms in the industry
– The nature of the product produced
– The degree of monopoly power each firm has
– The degree to which the firm can influence price
– Profit levels
– Firms’ behaviour – pricing strategies, non-price competition, output
levels
– The extent of barriers to entry
– The impact on efficiency
Market Structure
Perfect Pure
Competition Monopoly
Remember to
think about the
nature of the
product, entry and
exit, behaviour of
the firms, number
and size of the
firms in the
industry.
You might even
have to ask what
the industry is??
Canon SLR Camera
Bananas
Perfect Competition
• One extreme of the market structure spectrum
• Characteristics:
– Large number of firms
– Products are homogenous (identical) – consumer
has no reason to express a preference for any firm
– Freedom of entry and exit into and out
of the industry
– Firms are price takers – have no control
over the price they charge for their product
– Each producer supplies a very small proportion
of total industry output
– Consumers and producers have perfect knowledge about the market
Perfect Competition
Diagrammatic representation Given
The
AtThe average
The
the
thisMC industry
assumption
is the
output costcost
price
curve
theofofisfirm
profit
is the
standard
maximisation,
producing ‘U’ –additional
determined the
shaped
by
firmtheproduces
curve.
demand
Cost/Revenue atis making normal atprofit.
MC MCan
(Q1).
(marginal)
This
lowest
cuts
output
and supply
falls
as is
Thisat
thewhere
a
point
a first
AC
units
long
whole.
output
of
curve
because
(due
MC
of
theoutput.
run
level
The
industry
=
to firm
the
of
MR
its It
is athe
law
is a of
fraction
mathematical
equilibrium position. rises
diminishing
veryof the
small total
relationship
returns)
supplier
industry
then
within
supply.
between
asthe
output
industry
marginal
rises.and andhas average
no
AC values.
control over price. They will
sell each extra unit for the
same price. Price therefore
= MR and AR
P = MR = AR
Q1 Output/Sales
Perfect Competition
Diagrammatic representation Because the model assumes
perfect
Nowlower
The
Average knowledge,
assume
and
ACMarginal
aand
firmMC the firm
makes
costs
would
Cost/Revenue
MC gains
imply
could
short
the
some that
be
form
time
its product
earning
but price,
advantage
expected
the
of modification
firm is
inbefore
abnormal
orthe
gains
for
others
short
profit
be only
tonow
some
run,
to a
lower
copy
form
MC1 the idea or are
of cost advantage
(AR>AC)
remains the attracted
represented
same.(sayby atonew
thethe
industry
production
grey by method).
area. the existence Whatof
AC abnormal
would happen?profit. If new
enter the industry, supply will
firms
P = MR = AR
Abnormal profit
AC1
P1 = MR1 = AR1
Q1 Q2 Output/Sales
Monopolistic or Imperfect Competition
£0.60
MR D (AR)
Q1
Output / Sales
Monopolistic or Imperfect
Competition
Implications for the diagram:
MC Because there is relative
Cost/Revenue
freedom of entry and exit
into the market, new
firms will enter
AC encouraged by the
existence of abnormal
profits. New entrants will
increase supply causing
price to fall. As price falls,
the AR and MR curves
shift inwards as revenue
from each sale is now
less.
AR = AC
MR1 AR1
Q2 Output / Sales
Monopolistic or Imperfect Competition
• Some important points about monopolistic
competition:
– May reflect a wide range of markets
– Not just one point on a scale – reflects many
degrees
of ‘imperfection’
– Examples?
Monopolistic or Imperfect Competition
• Restaurants
• Plumbers/electricians/local builders
• Solicitors
• Private schools
• Plant hire firms
• Insurance brokers
• Health clubs
• Hairdressers
• Funeral directors
• Estate agents
• Damp proofing control firms
Monopolistic or Imperfect Competition
• In each case there are many firms
in the industry
• Each can try to differentiate its product
in some way
• Entry and exit to the industry is relatively free
• Consumers and producers do not have perfect knowledge of
the market – the market may indeed be relatively localised.
Can you imagine trying to search out the details, prices,
reliability, quality of service, etc for every plumber in the UK in
the event of an emergency??
Oligopoly
• Competition between the few
– May be a large number of firms in the industry but the
industry is dominated
by a small number of very large producers
• Concentration Ratio – the proportion of total market
sales (share) held by the top 3,4,5, etc firms:
– A 4 firm concentration ratio of 75% means the top 4 firms
account for 75% of all
the sales in the industry
Oligopoly
• Example:
The music industry has
• Music sales – a 5-firm concentration
ratio of 75%.
Independents make up
25% of the market but
there could be many
thousands of firms that
make up this
‘independents’ group.
An oligopolistic market
structure therefore
may have many firms
in the industry but it is
dominated by a few
large sellers.
Market Share of the Music Industry 2002. Source IFPI: http://www.ifpi.org/site-content/press/20030909.html
Oligopoly
The
Assume
IfThe
thefirm
principle
firmthe
therefore,
seeks
firm
ofto
is
thelower
effectively
charging
kinked
its price
demand
a faces
price to of
£5‘kinked
a
gain and
a curvedemand
competitive
producing
rests on curve’
an forcing
advantage,
the
output itsit rivals
principle
of 100. to
will follow
maintain that:
asuit.
stableAnyorgains
rigid pricing
it makes will
If it chose to raise price above £5, its
quickly beOligopolistic
structure. lost and the firms
% changemay in
rivals
a. would
If a firm
not raises
followitssuit
price,
anditsthe firm
demand will
overcome this
beby smaller
engagingthaninthenon-%
effectively
rivalsfaces
will not
an follow
elasticsuitdemand
reduction
price in price – total revenue
competition.
curve for its product (consumers would
would
b. Ifagaina firmfall
lowers
as theitsfirm
price,
nowitsfaces
buy from the cheaper rivals). The %
£5 a relatively
rivalsinelastic
will all dodemand
the same
change in demand would be greater
curve.
than the % change in price and TR
Total would fall.
Revenue B
Total Revenue A
D = elastic
Total Revenue B Kinked D Curve
D = Inelastic
100 Quantity
Duopoly
• Market structure where the industry is dominated
by two large producers
– Collusion may be a possible feature
– Price leadership by the larger of the two firms may exist – the
smaller firm follows the price lead
of the larger one
– Highly interdependent
– High barriers to entry
– Cournot Model – French economist – analysed duopoly –
suggested long run equilibrium would see equal market share and
normal profit made
– In reality, local duopolies may exist
Monopoly
• Pure monopoly – where only
one producer exists in the industry
• In reality, rarely exists – always
some form of substitute available!
• Monopoly exists, therefore,
where one firm dominates the market
• Firms may be investigated for examples of
monopoly power when market share exceeds
25%
• Use term ‘monopoly power’ with care!
Monopoly
Profit
£3.00
MR AR
Output / Sales
Q1
Monopoly
Welfare
Costs / Revenue implications of
monopolies
MC
A look back at the
anddiagram for
The
The higher
price
monopolyin
price
a competitive
price lower
would be
£7 perfect competition will reveal
output
market
£7 permeans
unit
would with
that
beoutput
£3
consumer
withlevels
AC that inat
surplus
output
lower equilibrium,
is
levels
Q2.
reduced, price will by
at Q1.indicated be
Loss of consumer equal to the MC
the grey shaded area. of production.
On the face of it, consumers
surplus We
facecan lookprices
higher therefore
and atlessa
comparison of the differences
choice in monopoly conditions
£3 between
comparedprice and competitive
to more output in a
competitive situation compared
environments.
to a monopoly.
AR
MR
Output / Sales
Q2 Q1
Monopoly
Welfare
Costs / Revenue implications of
monopolies
MC
The monopolist will benefit
be
£7 affected
from additional
by a loss
producer
of producer
AC surplus equal
showntobythe
thegrey
grey
triangle rectangle.
shaded but……..
Gain in producer
surplus
£3
AR
MR
Output / Sales
Q2 Q1
Monopoly
Welfare
Costs / Revenue implications of
monopolies
MC The value of the grey shaded
£7 triangle represents the total
welfare loss to society –
AC sometimes referred to as
the ‘deadweight welfare loss’.
£3
AR
MR
Output / Sales
Q2 Q1
Contestable Markets
• Theory developed by William J. Baumol,
John Panzar and Robert Willig (1982)
• Helped to fill important gaps in market
structure theory
• Perfectly contestable market – the
pure form – not common in reality but a
benchmark to explain firms’ behaviours
Contestable Markets
• Key characteristics:
– Firms’ behaviour influenced by the threat
of new entrants to the industry
– No barriers to entry or exit
– No sunk costs
– Firms may deliberately limit profits made
to discourage new entrants – entry limit pricing
– Firms may attempt to erect artificial barriers to entry –
e.g…
Contestable Markets
• Over capacity – provides the
opportunity to flood the market
and drive down price in the event
of a threat of entry
• Aggressive marketing and branding
strategies to ‘tighten’ up the market
• Potential for predatory
or destroyer pricing
• Find ways of reducing costs and
increasing efficiency to gain competitive
advantage
Contestable Markets
• ‘Hit and Run’ tactics – enter the
industry, take the profit and get
out quickly (possible because of
the freedom of entry and exit)
• Cream-skimming – identifying
parts of the market that are high
in value added and exploiting
those markets
Contestable Markets
• Examples of markets exhibiting
contestability characteristics:
– Financial services
– Airlines – especially flights
on domestic routes
– Computer industry – ISPs, software,
web development
– Energy supplies
– The postal service?