Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Editors
Joseph B Layde
Medical College of Wisconsin, USA
Richard Balon
Wayne State University, USA
World Scientific
NEW JERSEY • LONDON • SINGAPORE • BEIJING • SHANGHAI • HONG KONG • TA I P E I • CHENNAI
616.89--dc23
2012051672
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright
Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to
photocopy is not required from the publisher.
Printed in Singapore.
Contents
Abbreviations List ix
Contributors List xix
vi Contents
Contents vii
viii Contents
Index 915
Abbreviations List
ix
x Abbreviations List
Abbreviations List xi
Abbreviations List xv
Contributors List
xix
xx Contributors List
Richard Balon, MD
Professor of Psychiatry
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
Email: rbalon@wayne.edu
Cyril Höschl, MD
Professor of Psychiatry and Chair
Department of Psychiatry
Third School of Medicine, Charles University and
Director, Psychiatric Center Prague
Prague, Czech Republic
Email: hoschl@pcp.lf3.cuni.cz
Stephanie Bagby-Stone, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry
University Missouri Medical Centre
1 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65201, USA
Email: BagbyStoneS@health.missouri.edu
Jessica R. Nittler, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry
Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri
1 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212, USA
Email: NittlerJ@health.missouri.edu
John Lauriello, MD
Professor and Chairman
Chancellor’s Chair of Excellence in Psychiatry
University of Missouri Department of Psychiatry
1 Hospital Drive, DC067.00, Columbia, MO 65212, USA
Email: laurielloj@health.missouri.edu
Mara Pheister, MD
Assistant Professor, Director of Residency Education
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine
Medical College of Wisconsin
8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Email: mpheister@mcw.edu
Michael Koelch, MD
Assistant Professor, Department of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
University Hospital of Ulm, Germany and
Medical Director, Department of Child
and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vivantes
Berlin, Germany
Email: michael.koelch@uniklinik-ulm.de
Joerg M. Fegert, MD
Professor for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Medical Director, Department of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
University Hospital of Ulm, Germany
Email: joerg.fegert@uniklinik-ulm.de
Peter F. Buckley, MD
Dean, Medical College of Georgia and Professor
Department of Psychiatry and Health Behavior
Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Health Sciences University
1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
Email: pbuckley@georgiahealth.edu
Adriana Foster, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Psychiatry and Health Behavior
Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Health Sciences University
997 St Sebastian Way, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
Email: afoster@georgiahealth.edu
Sandra Rackley, MD
Program Director, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Fellowship,
Director, Psychiatry Consultation-Liaison and Emergency
Department Services, Children’s National Medical Center,
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and of Pediatrics, and
The George Washington University School of Medicine
111 Michigan Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA
Email: srackley@childrensnational.org
J. Michael Bostwick, MD
Professor of Psychiatry
Assistant Dean of Student Support Services and
Director of Medical School Education in Psychiatry
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Email: Bostwick.John@mayo.edu
Pedro Ruiz, MD
Professor and Executive Vice Chair
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
School of Medicine, University of Miami, USA
Email: PRuiz2@med.miami.edu
Alana Iglewicz, MD
Assistant Clinical Professor
Department of Psychiatry
University of California, San Diego
9500 Gilman Drive #0664 San Diego, CA 92122, USA
Email: aiglewicz@ucsd.edu
Ipsit V. Vahia, MD
Assistant Clinical Professor
Department of Psychiatry
Stein Institute for Research on Aging
University of California, San Diego
9500 Gilman Drive #0664 San Diego, CA 92122, USA
Email: ivahia@ucsd.edu
Dilip V. Jeste, MD
Estelle and Edgar Levi Clair in Aging
Director, Sam and Rose Stein Institute
for Research on Aging
Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry and Neurosciences
University of California, San Diego
9500 Gilman Drive #0664
La Jolla, CA 92093-0664, USA
Email: djeste@ucsd.edu
Christina L. Wichman, DO
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychiatry
Medical College of Wisconsin
8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Email: cwichman@mcw.edu
Jean M. Goodwin, MD
Clinical Professor of Psychiatry
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
Email: jmgoodwin@aol.com
Oludamilola A. Salami, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychiatry and Behavorial Sciences
The Medical College of Wisconsin
1155 N. Mayfair Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Email: damisal@gmail.com
W. Stewart Agras, MD
Professor
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Stanford University, School of Medicine
Stanford, CA 94305-5722, USA
Email: sagras@stanford.edu
Matteo Balestrieri, MD
Professor of Psychiatry, University of Udine
Director, Department of Psychiatry, Teaching Hospital of Udine
P. le S. M. Misericordia 15
33100 Udine, Italy
Email: matteo.balestrieri@uniud.it
Joel Paris, MD
Professor of Psychiatry
McGill University
845 Sherbrooke Street West
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Email: joel.paris@mcgill.ca
Mark Newman, MD
University of Michigan House Officer
Department of Psychiatry
University of Michigan Health System
1500 E. Medical Center Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Email: marknewm@med.umich.edu
Ondria Gleason, MD
University of Oklahoma
Professor and Chair
Department of Psychiatry
University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine
4502 E. 41st Street
Tulsa, OK 74135-2512, USA
Email: Ondria-Gleason@ouhsc.edu
Aaron Pierce, DO
Assistant Professor
University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine
Department of Psychiatry
4502 E. 41st Street, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA
Email: Aaron-pierce@ouhsc.edu
Bryan Touchet, MD
Associate Professor
University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine
Department of Psychiatry
4502 E. 41st Street, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA
Email: bryan-touchet@ouhsc.edu
Mark T. Wright, MD
Associate Professor
Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral
Medicine and Neurology
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Email: mwright@mcw.edu
Sanjai Rao, MD
Associate Training Director
UCSD Department of Psychiatry
University of California, San Diego, USA
Email: sdrao@ucsd.edu
Sidney Zisook, MD
Professor
UCSD Department of Psychiatry
University of California, San Diego, USA
Email: szisook@ucsd.edu
Elizabeth Burgess, MD
Hospital Psychiatrist, INSERM U894 Team 1
Centre de Psychiatrie et de Neurosciences
2ter rue d’Alésia, 75014 Paris, France
Email: elizabeth_burgess@yahoo.com
Morton M. Silverman, MD
Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Department of Psychiatry and Behaviorial Neuroscience
The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine
4858 S. Dorchester Ave Chicago, IL 60615-2012, USA
Email: msilverman@suicidology.org
Kristi Estabrook, MD
General Practice Physician
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine
Medical College of Wisconsin
8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Email: kestabrook@mcw.edu
Belinda Bandstra, MD
Clinical Instructor
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science
Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall
Stanford, CA 94305-2004, USA
Email: bandstra@stanford.edu
Anthony Mascola, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science
Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall
Stanford, CA 94305-2004, USA
Email: amascola@stanford.edu
Daryn Reicherter, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science
Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall
Stanford, CA 94305-2004, USA
Email: reichertermd@yahoo.com
Rena Sugarbaker, MD
Psychiatry Resident
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall
Stanford, CA 94305-2004, USA
Email: rena1@stanford.edu
Travis Fisher, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine
Medical College of Wisconsin
8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Email: tfisher@mcw.edu
Chapter 1
1. INTRODUCTION
The suffering associated with neuropsychiatric diseases is severe and yet
remains poorly understood. Most of these conditions emerge relatively
early in life, or have clear antecedents, and recent advances in neurosci-
ence make the biological contributions to neuropsychiatric disease
increasingly evident. The personal experience of mental illness redefines
the lives of those affected by these diseases as well as all who love and
care for them. People with mental illness, by definition, have deficits in
the spheres of life that bring fulfillment and social good. These deficits
affect personal and family relationships and employment or other forms
of meaningful work. Beyond the effects on individuals, families, and com-
munities, it is clear that the burden of disease — as measured in death,
disability, lost productivity, and direct and indirect societal costs —
throughout the world is devastating.
Understanding and providing care for people living with neuropsychiatric
diseases involve a special set of professional attitudes and expertise. This
work entails a respectful, empathic, and compassionate approach to indi-
viduals who have serious, disabling, and stigmatizing conditions. This work
also requires foundational knowledge of the biomedical and social sciences,
of clinical therapeutics, and of different models and systems of care.
4. HANDBOOK ORGANIZATION
This handbook is organized around several core knowledge domains:
approaching the field of psychiatry, the initial assessment of the patient,
psychiatric disorders, treatment settings, psychiatric education and
research, and special topics. It is our hope that this handbook will help the
clinician to progress from the starting point of recognizing the possible or
likely diagnosis to the more important insights that come with understand-
ing of their patients’ experiences of living with disease and helping them
to bear and alleviate their suffering.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Foremost and most importantly, we would like to express our gratitude to
Ann Tennier for her hard work on this book. She has done a marvelous job
to keep us on target and on time. Her editing has been flawless. This book
would not exist without her.
REFERENCES
1. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. (2008) Substance abuse and mental
health services administration.
2. Kendler et al. (2010) The development of the Feighner criteria: A historical
perspective. Am J Psychiatry 167: 134–142.
3. Lim et al. (2008) A new population-based measure of the economic burden
of mental illness in Canada. Chronic Dis Can 28(3): 92–98.
4. Mathers C, Boerma T, Fat DM. (2004) The Global Burden of Disease: 2004
Update, Available at: http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/Reports_GBD_
report_2004update_full.pdf
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration. (2010) Results from the 2010
National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings,
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.
6. World Health Organization. (2003) Investing in mental health. Available at:
http://www.who.int/mental-health/media/investing_mnh.pdf
7. World Health Organization. (2011) WHO Mental Health Atlas. Available at:
whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9799241564359_eng.pdf
Chapter 2
1. INTRODUCTION
Why address international issues in psychiatry? There are multiple
reasons for addressing international issues on the pages of this textbook,
but foremost, as Melvin Sabshin14 aptly wrote, “Whether it is recognized
or not, all psychiatrists are internationalists, and the field of psychiatry is
international.” For a long time, the main international issue in psychiatry
was the abuse of psychiatry in various countries around the world (nota-
bly, in the past, the USSR, Chile under Pinochet, Cuba, South Africa dur-
ing apartheid) in particular and ethical and human rights issues in general.
However, as the world has become more interconnected and many areas
of human activities have globalized, it has become obvious that many
other issues addressing modern-era psychiatry are global, international,
and that Sabshin14 is correct in calling the field of psychiatry an interna-
tional one.
Psychiatry, much more than other medical disciplines, is connected
with many other fields and societal and social issues. As psychiatry inves-
tigates the brain and its relationship to the human experience and behav-
ior, it is frequently asked to help to understand various undesirable social
phenomena (e.g. addictive behaviors, cults, terrorism, and violence).4 One
of the branches of psychiatry, social psychiatry, actually focuses on the
relationship between manifestation, course, and outcome of mental illness
and social factors. It may provide partial explanation for some psychiatric
phenomena and their relationship to social issues. However, “. . . it cannot
provide psychiatric explanations for social phenomena. Psychiatry is not
a social service. It does not provide expertise in taking care of the helpless
people if the helplessness is the effect of social factors rather than a dis-
ease process. Psychiatry is not a psychological counselling service for the
unhappy, unfortunate, weary and dissatisfied. It may tell them that their
plight is not a disease but a human condition.”4 It is important to under-
stand that the limits of psychiatry were frequently obscured and
misunderstood during the last century. Thus, psychiatry frequently either
overpromised its abilities to solve societal phenomena or was abused for
the purpose of solving some societal (or even political) phenomena. Some
of the areas discussed in this chapter are connected to social and societal
issues but should be viewed and understood within the limits of psychiatry
as a medical discipline.
2. DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION
Our understanding of mental disorders is limited. Sartorius13 notes,
“Biological and other sciences have produced a lot of new facts in recent
years but no unifying theory that would help to put them in meaningful
relationships.” He is also correct in stating that there is very little evidence
about the nosological status of psychiatric disorders. However, diagnosis
is an extremely important issue in everything that physicians do. It is
important to realize that a diagnosis has meaning not only for physicians
but also for patients. It allows us to label what is wrong — and that iden-
tification provides a great relief to patients in any country or culture. The
fact that the physician is able to identify “what is wrong” means, in the
patient’s mind, that the doctor knows what he or she is doing. It is a start-
ing point and a cornerstone of the treatment process. From a physician’s
point of view, a diagnosis means several related things. It is a short scien-
tific description for taxonomic classification and/or a process of deciding
the nature of a diseased condition by examining the symptoms. Diagnosis
is also a careful examination and analysis of the facts in an attempt to
understand and explain something. Finally, it is a decision and an opinion
based on such an examination.
3. EDUCATION
Many aspects of medicine in general and psychiatry and mental health in
particular10 are becoming global. With globalization and the movement of
the workforce around the globe, medical education, including psychiatric
education, needs to become truly international.1 In fact, the process of
internationalizing clinical care and medical education has been gradually
happening over the last several decades. Examples of globalization and
international exchange of medical education and clinical care include
the opening of US medical school campuses in other countries (e.g. the
Cornell University Medical Campus in Doha, Qatar, or the Duke University
Medical Campus in Singapore), clinical rotations of medical students from
Caribbean and some Israeli medical schools in the United States, interpre-
tation of imaging studies overseas during the night-time in the United
States, special tracks for students from various countries in some European
countries (e.g. Greek and Norwegian students in the Czech Republic),
medical “tourism” (traveling abroad to get cheaper or better medical care,
which occurs among citizens of many nations), and the Joint Commission
(a US agency which ensures through an accreditation process that hospi-
tals meets certain standards of care) accreditation of some hospitals in
India and Thailand.
The education of medical students in psychiatry has, on the international
level, focused mostly on student exchange at various levels (mostly elective
psychiatry rotations abroad) and on teaching students about transcultural
psychiatry. The opportunity to experience different systems of delivery of
care, different approaches to mental illness, and of course, different
cultures has always been attractive to some students. However, arranging
rotations abroad has not always been easy for various reasons, including
student safety and malpractice coverage. The recent integration of Europe
allows much easier movement of medical students among European coun-
tries, and thus the exchange of medical students interested in psychiatry
4. RESEARCH
Psychiatric research is also gradually spreading around the globe in the
form of international studies. Some of the original international studies
yielded quite interesting and important results — for instance, the study
pointing out the overdiagnosing of schizophrenia and underdiagnosing of
bipolar disorder in the United States as compared to in the United Kingdom.
The WHO has organized various studies on schizophrenia (e.g. the WHO
International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia (IPSS)). The unexpected find-
ings of the early WHO studies were that patients with schizophrenia in the
developing countries (Nigeria, India) had a considerably better course and
outcome than patients with schizophrenia in the developed countries. The
outcome of patients in developing countries was not uniformly better.6
However, patients from the developing countries in some WHO studies
had higher rates of complete clinical remission than those from the devel-
oped countries, and they experienced significantly longer periods of unim-
paired functioning in the community (while only 16% of them were on
antipsychotic medication versus 61% in the developed countries). The
results of these studies underscored the variety of factors involved in the
course and outcome of mental disorders and were very important in modi-
fying our thinking about chronic mental illness. Some of the conclusions
of these studies were later criticized as overreaching and not uniform.
However, as Jablensky and Sartorius6 wrote,
The erosion of social support systems, likely to be associated with the pro-
cesses of globalization, should be a matter of grave concern. The sobering
experience of high rates of chronic disability and dependency associated
with schizophrenia in high-income countries, despite access to costly bio-
medical treatment, suggests that something essential to recovery is missing
in the social fabric. Thus the existence of outcome differentials between
populations and cultures is not ‘presumed wisdom’ but a real complex issue
which should be addressed with standards of precision and rigor that are
customary in scientific research and discourse.
countries may also, for cultural and other reasons, attempt to please the
investigators and thus report a better outcome than it actually is. These
insights are supported by the fact that in some Eastern-European coun-
tries, the placebo-verum signal is usually more pronounced than, for
instance, in the United States. All these factors make the interpretation of
international studies difficult at times.
Psychiatric research will certainly become more international. The
internationalization of research brings advantages in combining financial
resources, exchanging different ideas and approaches to various problems,
and accessing different subject populations. However, we have to be care-
ful about its negative aspects, such as the possible exploitation of research
subjects in the developing countries or questionable reliability of the data.
5. ETHICS
Ethical and various other issues discussed in this chapter are certainly
interconnected on all levels. However, ethics is probably most connected
to human rights in general and to the mentally ill in particular, as well as
to the previously discussed issues on international research studies.
Different countries have different ethical standards for care and for
research. Some authors from the developed countries would even question
whether the lack of implementation of comprehensive mental health care
is ethical — an attitude barely comprehensible to a psychiatrist from a
country without any financial resources for mental health and with wide-
spread sexual abuse of women and torture of members of minority ethnic
groups.
Participation of psychiatrists in torture or assistance in execution would
probably be considered unethical all over the world at the present time.
However, forcible commitment of dissidents to mental institutions and
questionable experimentation by psychiatrists in the former Soviet Union
is a well-known fact.
The most important area of international ethics is probably the partici-
pation of patients with severe mental illness in clinical trials. The issues
involve the evaluation of patients’ capacity to participate in a research
study, their ability to give informed consent to participate in research, and
do not fully accept the high association between suicide and mental ill-
ness. Some cultures and religions (e.g. Catholicism, Islam) significantly
stigmatize suicide. Studying these differences and cultural influences may
help us to understand some aspects of suicide. Interestingly, two major
studies on possible treatment of suicidality and prevention of suicide had
elements of international research studies. The first study on the antisui-
cidal effect of lithium was a collaborative effort between US and Italian
researchers conducted in Sardinia. The InterSePT study examining the
antisuicidal effect of clozapine was a truly international effort conducted
in centers in several countries.
The increased migration between countries also brings culture and
cultural issues into the international spotlight. Some of the mentioned
culture-bound syndromes could suddenly appear in a country where these
syndromes have never been seen before, such as cases of koro syndrome
in Western Europe. Another example is the practice of so-called folk
healers from developing countries in major urban areas of developed
countries.
other laypeople to help children with the stress of war or major disasters
in various places around the world (e.g. Sarajevo, Bosnia; Caucasus;
Pakistan).5
Haiti’s mental health system (previously almost non-existent) collapsed
during the 2010 earthquake there. As many as one in five Haitian earth-
quake victims are estimated to have suffered serious psychological trauma
for which professional help is needed. Various international and national
psychiatric organizations have offered and arranged some professional
help (e.g. volunteers, medications), but to this date we are not aware of
any systematic effort to rebuild the previous mental health system or to
build something more effective.
Similarly, there has been no systematic effort to address the psycho-
logical traumas and mental health of refugees. The psychological issues
of victims of torture (e.g. anxiety, depression, survivor guilt, and loss
of dignity, family, possessions, and trust) have been addressed in a non-
systematic way. Studying these issues in an organized fashion is impos-
sible for logistical reasons.
These issues definitely warrant the attention and efforts of various
international and national psychiatric associations, such as the WHO,
APA, or EPA.
8. MISCELLANEOUS
A host of international issues may or do require involvement of psychiatry
and psychiatrists, such as international adoptions (e.g. evaluation of chil-
dren to be adopted; post-adoption adjustment); airline passenger miscon-
duct (e.g. intoxication, exacerbation of mental illness) and its handling
within the medico–legal context; estimates of global mental health burden
associated with alcohol and drug abuse; and urbanization of developing
countries and its association with mental health issues and services.
10. CONCLUSION
Psychiatry certainly is an international discipline connected to many inter-
national problems and issues. As a discipline, psychiatry at the interna-
tional level needs to establish an active global network for collaboration
in mental health research and policy, to map the needs and structures for
providing them, to define a minimum standard of care, to harmonize edu-
cational efforts in psychiatric education, and to establish international
12. SELF-ASSESSMENT
12.1. Clinical trials conducted by pharmaceutical companies
in the developing countries may face which of the
following difficulties?
(A) Poor training of local raters in using rating instruments.
(B) Different concepts of mental illness.
(C) Looser ethical standards.
(D) Possible economic coercion.
(E) All of the above.
survivors and their children. She thus uses her experience of analytical work
with US. Holocaust survivors and their children in her telesupervision of
Chinese analysts in training.
REFERENCES
1. Balon R, Roberts LW, Coverdale J, Louie A, Beresin E. (2008) Globalization
of medical and psychiatric education and the focus of Academic Psychiatry
on the success of “international” authors. Acad Psychiatry 32: 151–153.
2. Belkin GS, Fricchione GL. (2005) Internationalism and the future of aca-
demic psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 29: 240–243.
3. Ekblad S, Manicavasagar V, Silove D, Baarnhielm S, Reczycki M, Mollica R,
Coello M. (2004) The use of international videoconferencing as a strategy
for teaching medical students about transcultural psychiatry. Transcult
Psychiatry 41: 120–129.
4. Höschl C. (2009) European psychiatry: Needs, challenges and structures.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 259 (Suppl 2): S119–S122.
5. Husain SS, Nair J, Holcomb W, Reid JC, Vargas V, Nair SS. (1998) Stress
reactions of children and adolescents in war and siege. Am J Psychiatry 155:
1718–1719.
6. Jablensky A, Sartorius N. (2008). What did the WHO studies really find?
Schizophr Bull 34: 253–255.
Chapter 3
Psychiatric Diagnosis
1. INTRODUCTION
As in other medical specialties, psychiatrists make a diagnosis by observing
signs and symptoms; collecting data from the patient and family, friends,
and former medical care providers; and utilizing appropriate diagnostic
procedures. At this time, most psychiatric diagnoses are made by using lists
of signs and symptoms organized into diagnostic criteria, which do not
refer to the etiology of the ailment. A few psychiatric diagnoses do refer-
ence etiology in their diagnostic criteria, including mental disorders due to
a general medical condition, trauma-related disorders, and adjustment dis-
orders. However, due to our current deficit in etiological understanding of
most mental illnesses, nearly all psychiatric conditions are considered dis-
orders of functioning or syndromes composed of patterns of signs and
symptoms, but not diseases with specific causes. We are in an exciting time
of advancement in the understanding of molecular biology, genetics, neuro-
chemistry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and cognitive neuroscience.
In the near future much will be learned regarding the etiology of psychiatric
disorders as the technologies to study the brain, the body, and the mind
expands. In psychiatric diagnosis, context also matters. As our biological
knowledge expands, our diagnoses and diagnostic systems will have to
grow to embrace these new insights alongside cultural diversity.
28
Psychiatric Diagnosis 29
A diagnosis can be the “answer” for which some patients and their
families are looking to understand themselves and their loved ones.
However, for some patients, a psychiatric diagnosis may feel shameful,
devastating, and inconsistent with their experience, e.g. delusional, con-
version, or somatoform disorders. Talking with patients about how they
feel regarding their diagnosis as well as educating patients and the impor-
tant people in their lives regarding the nature of psychiatric illness is
necessary to decrease stigma and promote understanding of these complex
biologic disorders.
Psychiatric diagnosis allows a means of communication to educate
future health care providers across disciplines. A psychiatric diagnosis
provides an international common language around which learning, train-
ing, and discussions can occur. Psychiatric patients are not isolated to
mental health clinics and often suffer from multiple co-occurring medical
conditions. It is important for all health care providers to have an under-
standing of and sensitivity to mental health diagnoses. Education regard-
ing psychiatric diagnoses helps to facilitate this understanding. Moreover,
the value of a psychiatric diagnosis in education is not limited to academic
medical settings; public education of the signs and symptoms of mental
illness can bring hope and understanding to those in need and their com-
munity, reduce stigma regarding psychiatric conditions, and facilitate
treatment.
In research, a psychiatric diagnosis provides a standardized means to
reduce heterogeneity by specifically defining conditions for study. This
categorization is vital for crafting research to further our knowledge of
mental illness, etiology, epidemiology, and treatment.5
Psychiatric Diagnosis 31
Psychiatric Diagnosis 33
Psychiatric Diagnosis 35
Psychiatric Diagnosis 37
reliable than self-rated scales, which are completed by the patient. Self-rated
scales can be efficient screening tools. Examples of commonly used clinician
rating scales include the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Brief
Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or
Anxiety (HAM-D or HAM-A), Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale
(YBOCS), Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS), Global Assessment of
Functioning (GAF), and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).
Examples of commonly used self-rating scales include the Beck Depression
Inventory (BDI) and the CAGE Questionnaire to assess alcohol problems.29
Structured clinical interviews were developed due to concerns regard-
ing the unreliability of psychiatric diagnosis and the different conceptual-
izations of mental disorders from different cultures. Structured clinical
interviews greatly increase inter-rater reliability and are of great use in
research.17,29
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) is the most
commonly used structured diagnostic interview in psychiatry. It is a semi-
structured interview that applies the DSM-IV criteria to the patient. The
SCID can take upto two hours to complete and is used almost exclusively
in research. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) is
a shorter, focused diagnostic interview for psychiatric diagnosis included
in the DSM-IV and ICD-10. The MINI can be administered in 15–30 min
and is used in research, clinical trials, and epidemiologic studies and may
be of use in clinical settings.29
Psychiatric Diagnosis 39
Psychiatric Diagnosis 41
Psychiatric Diagnosis 43
ICD-10
F00–F09 Organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders.
F10–F19 Mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use.
F20–F29 Schizophrenia, schizotypal, and delusional disorders.
F30–F39 Mood (affective) disorders.
F40–F48 Neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform disorders.
F50–F59 Behavioral syndromes associated with physiological disturbances and physical
factors.
F60–F69 Disorders of adult personality and behavior.
F70–F79 Mental retardation.
F80–F89 Disorders of psychological development.
F90–F98 Behavioral and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood
and adolescence.
F99 Unspecified mental disorder.
DSM-IV-TR
1. Disorders usually first diagnosed in infancy, childhood, or adolescence.
2. Delirium, dementia, and amnestic and other cognitive disorders.
3. Mental disorder due to general medical condition.
4. Substance-related disorders.
5. Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.
6. Mood disorders.
7. Anxiety disorders.
8. Somatoform disorders, factitious disorders, dissociative disorders.
9. Sexual and Gender Identify Disorders.
10. Eating disorders.
11. Sleep disorders.
12. Impulse — control disorders not elsewhere classified, adjustment disorders.
13. Personality disorders.
14. Other conditions that maybe a focus of clinical attention.
1) Global rating
This rating should represent the best estimate of the degree of dysfunction-in relation
to the maximum level of expected functioning in the sociocultural context of the
patient. The rating should be made regardless of whether the dysfunction is due to
somatic or psychiatric conditions, but the main reason for dysfunction should also
be indicated, i.e. mainly psychiatric, mainly somatic, both somatic and psychiatric.
2) Ratings of specific areas of functioning
A. Personal care and survival.
B. Occupational functioning: performance of expected role as remunerated workers,
student, or homemaker.
C. Functioning with family: interaction with spouse, parents, children, and other
relatives.
D. Broader social behavior (functioning in other roles and activities): interaction
with other individuals and the community at large, leisure activities.
Please use all available information (case notes, reports from relatives or staff, observation,
and interview of patient) in making global and specific ratings of dysfunction.
Rating Scale
Rate global and specific areas of functioning (A–D) using any of the values from 00–99,
including intermediate values. The following anchor values and definitions are
provided to facilitate rating:
00 No dysfunction: The patient’s functioning conforms to the norms of his/her reference
group or sociocultural context.
20 Minimum dysfunction: Deviation from the norm in one or more activities/roles is
present. The disturbances are minor but persist over the time period. More conspicuous
dysfunctions may appear for very short periods. E.g. one or two days.
40 Obvious dysfunction: The deviation from the norm is conspicuous, and dysfunctions
interfere with social adjustment. Dysfunction in at least one activities/role persists nearly
all the time. More severe dysfunction may appear only for a few days.
60 Serious dysfunction: Deviations from the norm are marked in most activities/roles
and persist more than half the time.
80 Very serious dysfunction: Deviation in all areas is very severe and persists nearly all
the time. Action by others to remedy or control the dysfunction might be required
(according to the rater’s judgment), but it does not need to have taken place in order
to make this rating.
99 Maximum dysfunction: Deviation from the norm has reached a crisis point. A clear
element of danger to the patient’s own existence or social life and/or to the lives of
others may be present. Some form of action or social intervention is necessary.
XX Not applicable (please state reason on coding sheet).
Psychiatric Diagnosis 45
Problems with primary support group: e.g. death of a family member, health problems
in family, disruption of family by separation, divorce, or estrangement; removal from
the home; remarriage of parent; sexual or physical abuse; parental overprotection;
neglect of child; inadequate discipline; discord with siblings; birth of a sibling.
Problems related to the social environment: e.g. death or loss of a friend; inadequate
social support; living alone; difficulty with acculturation; discrimination; adjustment
to life-cycle transition (such as retirement).
Educational problems: e.g. illiteracy; academic problems; discord with teachers or
classmates; inadequate school environment.
Occupational problems: e.g. unemployment; threat of job loss; stressful work schedule;
difficult work conditions; job dissatisfaction; job change; discord with boss or
co-workers.
Housing problems: e.g. homelessness; inadequate housing; unsafe neighborhood; discord
with neighbors or landlord.
Economic problems: e.g. extreme poverty; inadequate finances; insufficient welfare
support.
Problems with access to health care services: e.g. inadequate health care services;
transportation to health care facilities unavailable; inadequate health insurance.
Problems related to interaction with the legal system/crime: e.g. arrest; incarceration;
litigation; victim of crime.
Other psychosocial and environmental problems: e.g. exposure to disasters, war, or other
hostilities; discord with non-family caregivers such as counselor, social worker, or
physician; unavailability of social services agencies.
Unlike the ICD, the DSM separates mental disorders, personality disor-
ders, mental retardation, and medical conditions into distinct axes: Axis I:
Clinical disorders, including major mental disorders and learning
disorders; Axis II: Personality disorders and mental retardation; Axis III:
Acute medical conditions and physical disorders; Axis IV: Psychosocial
and environmental factors contributing to the disorder; Axis V: Global
Assessment of Functioning.
DSM-IV was published in 1994, had 886 pages, and listed 297 disor-
ders. To develop DSM-IV, the APA appointed a task force to significantly
revise the DSM-III. The committee of 27 individuals created 13 work
groups of 5–16 members each. Each work group had approximately
20 advisors and underwent a three-step process. First, they would conduct
Psychiatric Diagnosis 47
Table 4. Global assessment of functioning (GAF) rating scale for Axis V of the
DSM-IV-TR.
100–91: Superior functioning in a wide range of activities, life’s problems never seem to
get out of hand, is sought out by others because of his or her many positive
qualities. No symptoms.
90–81: Absent or minimal symptoms (e.g. mild anxiety before an examination), good
functioning in all areas, interested and involved in a wide range of activities,
socially effective, generally satisfied with life, no more than everyday problems
or concerns (e.g. an occasional argument with family members).
71–80: If symptoms are present, they are transient and expectable reactions to
psychosocial stressors (e.g. difficulty concentrating after family argument);
no more than slight impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning
(e.g. temporarily falling behind in schoolwork).
61–70: Some mild symptoms (e.g. depressed mood and mild insomnia) OR some
difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning (e.g., occasional
truancy, or theft within the household), but generally functioning pretty well,
has some meaningful interpersonal relationships.
51–60: Moderate symptoms (e.g. flat affect and circumstantial speech, occasional
panic attacks) OR moderate difficulty in social, occupational, or school
functioning (e.g. few friends, conflicts with peers or co-workers).
41–50: Serious symptoms (e.g. suicidal ideation, severe obsessional rituals, frequent
shoplifting) OR any serious impairment in social, occupational, or school
functioning (e.g. no friends, unable to keep a job).
31–40: Some impairment in reality testing or communication (e.g. speech is at times
illogical, obscure, or irrelevant) OR major impairment in several areas, such as
work or school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood (e.g. patient with
depression avoids friends, neglects family, and is unable to work; a child
frequently beats up younger children, is defiant at home, and is failing at
school).
21–30: Behavior is considerably influenced by delusions or hallucinations OR serious
impairment in communication or judgment (e.g. sometimes incoherent, acts
grossly inappropriate, suicidal preoccupation) OR inability to function in
almost all areas (e.g. stays in bed all day; no job, home, or friends).
11–20: Some danger of hurting self or others (e.g. suicide attempts without clear
expectation of death; frequently violent; manic excitement) OR occasionally
fails to maintain minimal personal hygiene (e.g. smears feces) OR gross
impairment in communication (e.g. largely incoherent or mute).
10–1: Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others (e.g. recurrent violence) OR
persistent inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene OR serious suicidal
act with clear expectation of death.
(Note: Use intermediate codes when appropriate, e.g. 45, 68, 72.).
Psychiatric Diagnosis 49
Psychiatric Diagnosis 51
third revision. The basic principles of ICD-10 are followed, as is the same
coding system. However, the GC-3 encourages diagnostic formulations
that are based on the use of all information available and allows experi-
enced clinicians to formulate diagnoses without strictly adhering to stand-
ard diagnostic criteria.20
The Latin American Guide for Psychiatric Diagnosis (GLDP) helps
clinicians from Latin America diagnose individuals that share a common
history, language, and way of dealing with life. These cultural differences
are felt to not be reflected in any other classification system, and thus the
GLDP was created for better psychiatric diagnosis in this particular subset
of individuals.20
8. KEY POINTS
• Due to our current lack of etiological understanding of most mental
illnesses, nearly all psychiatric conditions are considered disorders of
functioning or syndromes composed of patterns of signs and symp-
toms, and not diseases with specific causes.
• In psychiatry, it is atypical to find a single sign (observed objective
clinical finding) or symptom (subjective patient experience) that is
pathognomonic for a specific psychiatric disorder.
9. SELF-ASSESSMENT
9.1. Which of the following would be important
in the evaluation of a 55-year-old woman who was
brought to a hospital by her family with new onset
manic and psychotic symptoms?
(A) Patient interview.
(B) Collateral information.
(C) A complete physical and neurologic examination.
(D) Structural neuro-imaging.
(E) All of the above.
Psychiatric Diagnosis 53
Psychiatric Diagnosis 55
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Text Revision, American Psychiatric Press,
Washington, DC.
Psychiatric Diagnosis 57
16. Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ. (1998) Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry,
pp. 240–317, 8th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
17. Kendell R, Jablensky A. (2003) Distinguishing between the validity and util-
ity of psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 160(1): 4–12.
18. Lee S. (2001) From diversity to unity. The classification of mental disorders
in 21st century China. Psychiatr. Clin N Am 24(3): 421–431.
19. Mayes R, Horowitz AV. (2005) DSM-III and the revolution in the classifica-
tion of mental illness. J Hist Behav Sci 41(3): 249–267.
20. Mezzich JE, Berganza CE, Rulperez MA. (2001) Culture in DSM-IV, ICD-10,
and evolving diagnostic systems. Psychiatr Clin N Am 24(3) 407–419.
21. Mullin R. (1999) A brief history of ICD-10-PCS. J AHIMA 70(9): 97–98.
22. Pang AHT, Ungvari G, Wing YK, Lum F, Tso S, Chan K. (1995) WHO ICD-
10 multiaxial field trial — experience in Hong Kong. Hong Kong J
Psychiatry 5: 58–61.
23. Parker G. Gladstone G, Chee KT. (2001) Depression in the planet’s largest
ethnic group: The Chinese. Am J Psychiatry 158: 857–864.
24. Pies R. (2007) How objective are psychiatric diagnoses? Guess again.
Psychiatry MMC, 4(10): 18–22.
25. Schaffer D. (1996) A participant’s observations: Preparing DSM-IV. Can J
Psychiatry 41: 325–329.
26. Spiegel A. (2005) The dictionary of disorder: How one man revolutionized
psychiatry. The New Yorker 56–63.
27. Spitzer RL. (1981) The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: A
reformulation of the issues. Am J Psychiatry 138: 210–215.
28. Srivastava A, Grube M. (2009). Does intuition have a role in psychiatric
diagnosis? Psychiatr Q 80: 99–106.
29. Stern TA, Herman JB. (2004) The Massachusetts General Hospital Psychiatry
Update and Board Preparation, pp. 231–262, 491–502, 551–555, 2nd ed.
McGraw-Hill Companies, USA.
30. Wilson M. (1993) DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry:
A history. Am J Psychiatry 150(3): 399–410.
31. World Health Organization/International Classification of Diseases. (2010)
Available at: http//www.who.int/classifications/icd/en
32. Zhong J, Leung F. (2007) Should borderline personality disorder be included
in the fourth edition of the Chinese classification of mental disorders? Chin
Med J 120(1): 77–82 [in English].
Chapter 4
Psychiatric Genetics
1. INTRODUCTION
There has long been an appreciation that psychiatric illnesses are herita-
ble. A century ago, Emil Kraepelin studied the family histories of patients
with schizophrenia and concluded that the siblings of patients with schiz-
ophrenia were at a greater risk of developing schizophrenia than the gen-
eral population. Early investigations in psychiatric genetics focused on
twin studies by comparing the concordance rates of illnesses between
monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Adoption studies explored the relative
contributions of genetic influences and the influence of family environ-
ment. As it became possible to identify specific genetic variations, linkage
and association studies were conducted. More recently, genome wide
association studies (GWAS) have become possible. The goal of these
genetic studies is to increase our understanding of psychiatric disorders in
order to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
Reliably defining psychiatric diagnoses has been a major challenge.
The diagnostic criteria used to identify a case must include a clinically
relevant threshold that defines the diagnosis. A common example of the
problems that clinicians have in establishing a diagnosis is illustrated
in their difficulty in reliably defining a threshold of mania and hypoma-
nia that consistently differentiates bipolar disorder type I from bipolar
disorder type II.
59
1.2. Heritability
Heritability is a measure of the genetic underpinnings of a disease and is
defined as the proportion of disease risk that can be attributed to genetic
factors. The establishment of the heritability of a condition provides a
measure of the degree to which a disorder is genetically determined. For
virtually all psychiatric illnesses, phenotypic expression depends on both
genetic vulnerability and environmental influences.
A common method used to calculate the heritability of a specific illness
is to determine the difference between the concordance rates in monozy-
gotic and dizygotic twin samples and then multiply this difference by 2.
For example, if the concordance rate in monozygotic twins is 50% and
the concordance rate in dizygotic twins is 20%, the heritability is 60%
(i.e. (50 − 20) × 2 = 60).
Alternatively, heritability can be mathematically calculated using
analysis of variance to determine a restricted maximum likelihood statistic
(REML). Given that heritability is an estimate of the genetic nature of an
illness at the level of a given population, a heritability estimate for one
population cannot be assumed to be correct for a different population.
Psychiatric Genetics 61
Psychiatric Genetics 63
Psychiatric Genetics 65
Psychiatric Genetics 67
2.5. Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia is characterized by positive symptoms such as delusions
and hallucinations as well as negative symptoms such as apathy, abulia,
and lack of social interactions. Abnormalities in smooth pursuit eye move-
ments represent an endophenotype of schizophrenia that has been demon-
strated in both patients with schizophrenia and some of their family
members. Other endophenotypes of schizophrenia include reduced inhibi-
tion of P50 auditory-evoked potentials and P300 event-related potentials.
Schizophrenia has rates of heritability that have been estimated to be
between 73% and 90%. However, only a third of patients with schizophre-
nia have a positive family history. The rate of concordance between
monozygotic twins is approximately 50%, and the rate of concordance in
dizygotic twins is approximately 17%. Interestingly, the risk of an off-
spring of an unaffected twin developing schizophrenia is the same as the
risk of the offspring of the affected twin.
Several candidate genes have been associated with schizophrenia, and
some of these have also been associated with bipolar disorder (see
Table 1). A linkage study of a Scottish family with multiple members who
were diagnosed with schizophrenia identified a linkage site near the “dis-
rupted in schizophrenia” gene (DISC1). This finding was replicated in a
Finnish cohort and is a balanced translocation between chromosomes 1
and 11. DISC1 is involved in neurodevelopment and cAMP signaling.14
Association studies have identified the neuregulin 1 gene (NRG1) and
D-amino acid oxidase inhibitor gene (DAOA) as potential candidate
genes. Neuregulin regulates synaptic transmission, especially at the
excitatory glutamatergic system and inhibitory GABAergic system.
DAOA activates D amino acid oxidase, which oxidizes D-Serine, which,
in turn, is a co-agonist at NMDA glutamate receptors. This association
Table 1. Genes that have been associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disease.
Associated Associated
with with Bipolar
Gene Abbreviation Schizophrenia Disorder
Disrupted in schizophrenia 1 DISC1 √ √
D-amino acid oxidase activator DAOA √ √
Neuregulin 1 NRG1 √ √
Zinc finger protein 804A ZNF804A √
Catechol-O-methyltransferase COMT √
Dystrobrevin binding protein 1 DTNBP1 √
Regulator of G-protein signalling 4 RGS4 √
Glutamate receptor, metabotropic 3 GRM3 √
Solute carrier family 6 SLC6A3 √
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor BDNF √
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic,
GRIN2B √
N-methyl D-aspartate 2B
Clock homolog CLOCK √
Glutamate receptor, ionotropic,
GRIK4 √
kainate 4
Calcium channel, voltage-dependent,
CACNA1C √
L type, alpha 1C subunit
Ankyrin 3, node of Ranvier
ANK3 √
(ankyrin G)
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear
ARNTL √
translocator-like
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family,
ALDH1A1 √
member A1
Kruppel-like factor 12 KLF12 √
Psychiatric Genetics 69
Psychiatric Genetics 71
The third gene is the nitric oxide synthase 1, neuronal gene (NOS1),
which is involved in nitric acid synthesis and has been associated with
aggression and impulsivity. Nitric oxide is a second messenger that is
involved in both dopaminergic and serotoninergic neurotransmission. The
fourth gene is the cannabinoid receptor 1, brain gene (CNR1), which
codes for the endogenous cannabinoid receptor.7
Psychiatric Genetics 73
3. CONCLUSION
The ability to obtain extensive genotypic information and the expansion
of international collaborations of researchers has resulted in a rapid
advance in our understanding of psychiatric genetics. These advances
4. SELF-ASSESSMENT
4.1. The parents of a four-year-old boy who was recently
diagnosed with autism want to have another child and are
worried about the next child also having autism. There
is no family history of autism of which they are aware.
The chromosomal analysis of their first child did not reveal
any abnormalities. What is the best estimate of the
likelihood that their second child will develop autism?
(A) 1%.
(B) 10%.
(C) 25%.
(D) 50%.
(E) 66%.
Autism has heritability rates reportedly between 80% and 90% and is one
of the most heritable psychiatric disorders. Parents with one affected child
have about a 10% risk of having another child with autism.4
Answer: B
Psychiatric Genetics 75
(D) GRIK4.
(E) COMT.
REFERENCES
1. Barnett JH, Smoller JW. (2009) The genetics of bipolar disorder. Neuroscience
164: 331–343.
2. Bassett AS, Scherer SW, Brzustowicz LM. (2010) Copy number variations in
schizophrenia: Critical review and new perspectives on concepts of genetics
and disease. Am J Psychiatry 167: 899–914.
3. Bertram L, Tanzi RE. (2009) Genome-wide association studies in Alzheimer’s
disease. Hum Mol Genet 18. R137–R145.
4. Constantino JN, Zhang Y, Frazier T, Abbacchi AM, Law P. (2010) Sibling
recurrence and the genetic epidemiology of autism. Am J Psychiatry 167:
1349–1356.
5. Faraone SV, Perlis RH, Doyle AE, Smoller JW, Goralnick JJ, Holmgren MA,
Sklar P. (2005) Molecular genetics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Biol Psychiatry 57: 1313–1323.
6. Ferreira MA, O’ Donovan MC, Meng YA, Jones IR, Ruderfer DM, Jones L,
Fan J, Kirov G, Perlis RH, Green EK, Smoller JW, Grozeva D, Stone J,
Nikolov I, Chambert K, Hamshere ML, Nimgaonkar VL, Moskvina V, Thase
ME, Caesa S, Sachs GS, Franklin J, Gordon-Smith K, Ardlie KG, Gabriel
SB, Fraser C, Blumenstiel B, Defelice M, Breen G, Gill M, Morris DW,
Elkin A, Muir WJ, Mcghee KA, Williamson R, Macintyre DJ, Maclean AW,
St CD, Robinson M, Van Beck M, Pereira AC, Kandaswamy R, Mcquillin A,
Collier DA, Bass NJ, Young AH, Lawrence J, Ferrier IN, Anjorin A,
Farmer A, Curtis D, Scolnick EM, Mcguffin P, Daly MJ, Corvin AP,
Holmans PA, Blackwood DH, Gurling HM, Owen MJ, Purcell SM, Sklar P,
Craddock N. (2008) Collaborative genome-wide association analysis sup-
ports a role for ANK3 and CACNA1C in bipolar disorder. Nat Genet 40:
1056–1058.
7. Franke B, Neale BM, Faraone SV. (2009) Genome-wide association studies
in ADHD. Hum Genet 126: 13–50.
8. Freitag CM, Staal W, Kaluck SM, Duketis E, Waltes R. (2009) Genetics of
autistic disorders: Review and clinical implications. Eur Child Adolesc
Psychiarty 19: 169–178.
9. Harrison P, Weinberger D. (2005) Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and
neuropathology: On the matter of their convergence. Mol Psychiatry 10: 40–68.
10. Karg K, Burmeister M, Shedden K, Sen S. (2011) The serotonin transporter
promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revis-
ited: Evidence of genetic moderation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68(5): 444–454.
11. Lau JY, Eley TC. (2009) The genetics of mood disorders. Annu Rev Clin
Psychol 6: 313–337.
12. Le-Niculescu H, Patel SD, Bhat M, Kuczenski R, Faraone SV, Tsuang MT,
Mcmahon FJ, Schork NJ, Nurnberger JI, Jr., Niculescu AB, III. (2008)
Convergent functional genomics of genome-wide association data for bipolar
disorder: Comprehensive identification of candidate genes, pathways and
mechanisms. Am J Med Genet Part B 150B: 155–181.
13. O’ Donovan MC, Craddock N, Norton N, Williams H, Peirce T, Moskvina V,
Nikolov I, Hamshere M, Carroll L, Georgieva L, Dwyer S, Holmans P,
Marchini JL, Spencer CC, Howie B, Leung HT, Hartmann AM, Moller HJ,
Morris DW, Shi Y, Feng G, Hoffmann P, Propping P, Vasilescu C, Maier W,
Rietschel M, Zammit S, Schumacher J, Quinn EM, Schulze TG, Williams NM,
Giegling I, Iwata N, Ikeda M, Darvasi A, Shifman S, He L, Duan J,
Sanders AR, Levinson DF, Gejman PV, Cichon S, Nothen MM, Gill M,
Corvin A, Rujescu D, Kirov G, Owen MJ, Buccola NG, Mowry BJ,
Freedman R, Amin F, Black DW, Silverman JM, Byerley WF, Cloninger CR.
(2008) Identification of loci associated with schizophrenia by genome-wide
association and follow-up. Nat Genet 40: 1053–1055.
14. Ross CA, Margolis RL, Reading SA, Pletnikov M, Coyle JT. (2006)
Neurobiology of schizophrenia. Neuron 52: 139–153.
15. Scherag S, Hebebrand J, Hinney A. (2009) Eating disorders: The current sta-
tus of molecular genetic research. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19: 211–226.
Psychiatric Genetics 77
Chapter 5
Mara Pheister
78
2. PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES
It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss psychotherapy. However,
it may be useful to touch on some of the basic therapeutic tools that might
80 M. Pheister
2.3. Reflection
Reflection is a similar technique to empathic validation. The interviewer
repeats back what has been said in a supportive way. For example, for a
teenager who presents with superficial cuts to her wrists after a breakup
with a boyfriend, a statement of support, “You must have felt very alone,”
has two purposes. First, it checks with the patient to be sure that her story
is being understood, and it allows for correction if it is not. Second, it
names an emotion related to a behavior. Although this reflection may not
entirely accurately portray what the patient is feeling, it invites the patient
to put a name to the emotion. It also implies that others in the same
situation might also feel “alone.”
2.4. Containment
For some patients, the most therapeutic aspect of the interview can be
setting a boundary, or acting as a “container,” for their overwhelming
feelings. For a patient who is overwhelmed by powerful emotions, sharing
them with someone who will sit with him or her, without judgment or
reaction, can alleviate some of the pain.
2.5. Confrontation
Confrontation is a way to bring the patient’s attention to something that he
or she may be consciously avoiding. Done in a respectful way, it can be a
powerful tool to improve insight. For instance, a patient who says he is angry
that his girlfriend called for an ambulance after he took an overdose might
be confronted with the statement, “I wonder if there is a part of you that did
not want to die, and that is why you told your girlfriend what you did.”
2.6. Interpretation
Interpretation is a therapeutic technique usually reserved for later on in
treatment because it relies on a solid therapeutic relationship and under-
standing of the patient’s conscious and unconscious issues. Gabbard4 says,
“The intent is to make patients aware of things that are currently outside
of their awareness.” For instance, a patient who misses two appointments
after the psychiatrist’s vacation might be expressing anger toward the
therapist for the perceived “abandonment.” A partial interpretation might
start with, “I missed you at our last couple of sessions. I wonder if you had
any feelings about my vacation.” In a patient who has progressed further,
an interpretation might be, “I missed you at our last couple of sessions.
We have talked about how it feels for you when people leave. I wonder if
you are feeling angry with me for being away on vacation.”
2.7. Education
Finally, providing education to a patient can be extremely therapeutic. This
may involve explaining a diagnosis, normalizing a feeling, or reassuring
the patient (if appropriate) that something more serious is not going on.
82 M. Pheister
3. ASKING QUESTIONS
3.1. Open versus closed questions
In gathering information, it is important to recognize that the way in
which questions are asked will influence the answers. The inquiry “tell me
about your family,” is open ended, inviting the patient to explain in his or
her own words. How the patient answers tells a great deal. It allows the
patient to prioritize the importance of the information. For instance, does
the patient begin with his or her family of origin or with his or her own
children? Notice the patient’s body language and whether it matches the
patient’s words. Notice the thought process.
“Do you have brothers and sisters?” is an example of a closed ques-
tion, one which allows the patient to answer with one word. This pro-
vides factual information — for example, he has a sister — but less in the
way of his emotion, attachment, and so on. In some circumstances,
closed questions might be appropriate. For example, “Are you having
thoughts of killing yourself?” “Do you ever hear things that other people
do not hear?” Using closed questions like this helps to fill in important
details.
3.2. Transitions
Maintaining balance between listening to someone’s story and getting
some of the critical information that is needed can be difficult. Transitions
can be an effective way to get the needed information without being rude
or isolating the patient. Carlat3 refers to several kinds of transitions that
can help guide the patient. For example, the “smooth transition” [p. 30] is
a way of gently guiding the interview in a different direction.
• It sounds as if your father has had some trouble with alcohol (family
history or social history). Is that something with which you have ever
struggled? (moving into the substance abuse history).
A “referred transition” [p. 31] picks up on something that the patient
said earlier. It is useful to get more details from something mentioned
in another part of the interview or as a way to shift topics. It also lets
the patient know that you have been listening.
• Earlier you mentioned that you feel as if you are “going crazy” (open-
ing, chief complaint). What did you mean by that? (open question
expanding on the history of present illness).
The “introduced transition” [p. 31] lets the patient know that you are
changing course.
• Now I want to ask you some questions about your memory.
• It sounds as if this has been a very difficult time for you. (empathic
statement) Has the stress gotten in the way of your sleep? (smooth
transition)
• It sounds as if it was very difficult growing up. (empathic statement)
I would like to talk more about that when we have the chance. First,
however, I want to make sure that I understand what has been happen-
ing over these last few weeks. (introduced transition back to history
of present illness)
84 M. Pheister
• We do not have too much time left and there are a few things I want
to make sure we cover. (introduced transition) I am going to ask you
a few yes/no questions to see if I can fill in the blanks a little bit.
(focusing the patient, letting the patient know that you only need a
yes/no answer, which is especially helpful for disorganized patients
and also lets the clinician know if the patient has the capacity to
organize his or her thoughts for a short time).
86 M. Pheister
Table 2. Examples of closed and open question style when interviewing a withdrawn
patient.
Closed Open
Interviewer Tell me what’s going Interviewer Tell me what’s going on.
on. (open ended (open ended question/
question/statement) statement)
Patient I don’t know. I’m Patient I don’t know. I’m depressed.
depressed.
Interviewer How long have you Interviewer Describe what you mean by
been depressed? (closed “depressed.” (open ended)
question)
Patient Forever Patient I do not know, sad.
Interviewer Since you were a child? Interviewer Anything else? (staying with
( frustrated, turning to open-ended question, pressing
“20 questions” style of further)
interviewing to get
information)
Patient Yeah Patient I do not have any energy; I do
not really care about things.
(a little more information)
Interviewer Nothing? (minimal talking,
invites patient to fill in the
blanks)
Patient Well, not nothing, I mean I
still worry about my kids and
stuff. ( patient brought up
“kids,” indicating this might
be a more comfortable topic)
Interviewer Tell me about your kids.
(open ended and, in this case,
a more neutral subject).
88 M. Pheister
translator is difficult for both the parent, who may not want the child to
know some personal details, and the child, who is put into a parentified
role. Telephone services may allow for easy, effective, immediate, con-
fidential translation if a professional interpreter is not physically
available.
A translator’s cultural expertise allows for some explanation when
needed, rather than direct, word-for-word translation. However, because
the interviewer is also assessing the presence or absence of a thought
disorder, it is important for the interpreter to note if the patient is not
speaking comprehensibly. When using an interpreter, begin with an
introduction. Face the patient and speak to the patient directly, rather
than to the interpreter; for example, “Tell me how you are feeling,” not
“Ask him how he feels.” Pause frequently to allow the interpreter to
translate.
4.1. Opening
According to MacKinnon et al.,7 “The most important technique in
obtaining the psychiatric history is to allow the patient to tell his story in
his own words and in the order he chooses” [p. 41].
The purpose of the opening is twofold — to begin hearing the patient’s
concerns and to start building rapport. Let the patient know what to
expect. Many people may have seen a psychiatrist only on television.
They may not know what is expected of them. Most of the time, patients
have been in significant distress for some time before they finally ask for
help.13 For the anxious patient, this leaves plenty of time to build up an
idea of what a first visit might be like. Such patients may feel afraid that
the psychiatrist will think they are “crazy” or hospitalize them. Letting
• “My wife says she will leave me if I do not get help, but my ADHD
is not that big a deal.” (going back to the man’s first words gives the
clinician an idea of the effect the ADHD is having on his functioning
and relationship).
• “I am looking for a new psychiatrist because the last one never lis-
tened to me.” (such a statement may indicate that the patient has dif-
ficulty in relationships and that the clinician may be the next one who
“does not listen”).
90 M. Pheister
4.2. Middle
The middle section is the bulk of the interview, what most might think of
as a psychiatric interview. This is the time to obtain data, test the differen-
tial diagnosis, perform a mental status examination, observe responses,
determine safety, and decide what else is needed to make treatment deci-
sions. Again, some therapeutic value to the interview should be balanced
with the need to gather information. It is helpful to keep in mind what is
needed to determine the treatment plan — how much detail is needed for
this particular interview? To some extent, all interviews need to cover the
history of present illness, the psychiatric history, the psychiatric review of
systems, substance abuse history, family history, medical history, social
history, and mental status examination. Knowing this allows the inter-
viewer to follow the patient’s lead as different topics come up but to recall
what topics still need to be covered. A useful pneumonic is “History of
psychiatry reviews family drug abuse, medical and mental.”
Depression — “Have you ever had a time where you felt depressed? More than just sad,
but where it felt like you couldn’t get out of it, it affected your sleep, your appetite,
your energy?”
Mania — “Have you ever had a time where you felt the opposite of depressed? Where
you felt great, had a ton of energy, didn’t need as much sleep, spent more money or
did things that are unusual for you?” “How about when you had a lot of energy, but
felt really irritable, maybe yelling, screaming.” “Did others notice the change in your
mood?”
Psychotic — “Have you ever heard things other people don’t hear, seen things other
people don’t see?” “Ever feel like people are talking about you, following you?”
Cognitive — “Do you often lose things?” “Does your family every comment on your
memory?”
Anxiety — “Have you ever had a panic attack?” “Are there thoughts that you have
trouble getting out of your head?” “Do you ever need to check things, like the locks
or the stove, or need to do things in a certain order?”
Suicidal or Homicidal Ideation — Start with safest, most sensitive, before getting more
specific — “Have you ever felt like life wasn’t worth living?” “Do you ever think
about killing yourself?”
Somatoform/Eating — “How do you feel about your body?”
92 M. Pheister
energy but were really irritable, yelling, throwing things…?” These ques-
tions are specific enough to distinguish from “just a regular mood.” If the
patient offers any hesitation, the clinician can ask more specific questions
to clarify the situation.
to their use. This technique also avoids the checklist way of asking them
one a time. “Have you ever used marijuana?” “Have you ever used
cocaine?” Etc. Include questions about tobacco and caffeine, both because
of the health risks and the effects they might have on potential treatments.
A positive response to screening questions should prompt further
inquiry. Clinically relevant details include questions about last use,
longest period of sobriety, history of detox or withdrawal. Some patients
may minimize use, so asking questions about consequences — history of
a DUI, of withdrawal seizures — is a way to obtain more reliable
information.
94 M. Pheister
history, sexual history, history of trauma, and legal history. Knowing some
of the social history can be helpful at the beginning of the interview to
help put the presenting problem in some context. It’s important also to
assess a patient’s cultural values. This may include level of acculturation,
economic issues, language, migration history, history of oppression, war,
racism.
96 M. Pheister
place, person), recent memory (what they had for breakfast), immedi-
ate memory (repeating three words or a series of numbers), recall
(recalling the three words). Level of concentration is tested by having
the patient count backwards from 100 by 7 or saying the alphabet
backwards. Calculations, writing, fund of knowledge, repetition, and
abstract reasoning can also be tested.
4.3. Closing
The closing part of the interview is reserved for presenting and negotiating
a treatment plan. While interviewers may be tempted to ask questions up
until the last minute, this discussion is crucial to maintaining rapport.13
Eliciting a patient’s concerns, providing education and demonstrating
empathy have a direct effect on patient compliance.5
In lay terms, explain to the patient what may be causing their symp-
toms, including the biological, psychological, and social influences.13
This may include a diagnosis or an explanation of the differential diagno-
sis and what further information needs to be obtained. Finding out what
the patient knows about the diagnosis or what he/she thinks about the
formulation will allow the interviewer to clarify any misinformation and
address any issues that may interfere with treatment.
A useful way to discuss treatment is to approach it in a similar biopsy-
chosocial way: “Like depression, which involves biology, stress and the
way you cope with things, we need to approach treatment in the same
way.” Eliciting a patient’s thoughts and feelings about treatment can be
helpful. If someone is very apprehensive about taking medication, dis-
cussing the reasons behind this or addressing any myths can be useful. It
can also help the psychiatrist tailor the treatment plan.
“If you had a magic wand, and could make three symptoms disappear,
which would they be?” The answer to this question is sometimes surpris-
ing as the things the physician is concerned about may be very different
from the patient’s primary concerns. It allows one to further tailor the
treatment plan to address the patient’s primary concerns. For instance, a
depressed patient whose most concerning symptoms are concentration,
energy and motivation might be started on a different medication from
another depressed patient who is most troubled by lack of sleep,
ruminating thoughts and anhedonia. The clinician should also invite any
questions from the patient.
5. CONCLUSION
The psychiatric interview is a skill that will continue to develop over
time.1 Crucial is maintaining a balance between developing rapport and
gathering information, keeping in mind the context and purpose of this
particular interview. Ideally, in each patient interaction, there will be some
therapeutic value in an exchange of information between patient and
doctor.
6. KEY POINTS
• The purpose of the psychiatric interview is to establish rapport, obtain
data, formulate diagnoses, assess risk, and negotiate a treatment plan.
• Ideally, each interview should provide some therapeutic value.
• Create structure by dividing the interview into the opening, middle,
and closing.
• Avoid using a computer, taking copious notes, or asking lists of
questions.
• “History of Psychiatry Reviews Family Drug Abuse, Medical and
Mental”
7. SELF-ASSESSMENT
7.1. “It seems like you are concerned about being a burden
on your family” is an example of:
(A) Confrontation.
(B) Validation.
(C) Interpretation.
(D) Reflection.
(E) Education.
Answer: D, it is reflecting back a patient’s feeling or concern.
98 M. Pheister
8. CASE STUDY
A 57-year-old woman, previously diagnosed with “manic-depression”,
comes in after not seeing a psychiatrist for 10 years because “I need help.”
She is currently depressed and irritable, spends most days in a bathrobe,
thinks of suicide daily, but denies any intention. In the past, she has had
episodes of increased energy and decreased need for sleep, with racing
thoughts, irritability, paranoia, and talking loud and fast, lasting for “hours to
weeks.” “My family doctor does not think it is bipolar — I think that is what
I need to find out first.” She currently takes sertraline 50 mg, diazepam, and
zolpidem. The following is an example of how to negotiate a treatment plan:
Interviewer: Okay, here’s what I think is going on. First of all, I do think
this is bipolar disorder and let me tell you why. Like you
said, “bipolar disorder” is another name for “manic
depression”. I think you know what depression is — more
than just feeling sad, having trouble thinking, not enjoying
things, not functioning, having thoughts of hurting your-
self. And the manic part is when you have high energy, are
sleeping less, are more irritable, doing things that are un-
usual for you. And then there are times, like now, where you
have all of those symptoms together. It’s caused by a few
things — genetics for one (from what you described with
your dad, I think he may have been struggling with
100 M. Pheister
REFERENCES
1. American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training.
(2008) AADPRT Clinical Skills Verification Examination Form CSV.3.
Available at: http://www.academicpsychiatry.org/htdocs/Fidlerdocs/
Education/Clinical_Skills_Assessment/AADPRT_CSV_3b.pdf
2. American Psychological Association, Joint Task Force of Counseling
Psychology and The Society for the Psychological Study of Ethnic Minority
Issues (2002) Guidelines on Multicultural Education, Training, Research,
Practice and Organizational Change for Psychologists (Approved as APA
Policy thy the APA Council of Representatives, August 2002).
3. Carlat DJ. (2005) The Psychiatric Interview, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Gabbard GO. (2009) Textbook of Psychotherapeutic Treatments. American
Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
Chapter 6
1. INTRODUCTION
The modern-day physician has myriad medical and laboratory tests at his
or her disposal to aid in the diagnosis of physical disease, and it is this
diagnostic clarity that ultimately leads to comprehensive treatment plan-
ning intended to substantively improve or restore normal function. Mental
health providers seek similar goals. Unfortunately, mental illness can cre-
ate greater obstacles for the clinician than traditional physical disease
states because the symptoms and underlying pathology are often far more
elusive. For example, helping a parent to understand that her child has
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and, moreover, that a
stimulant medication might be indicated on the basis of a set of intangible
symptoms is arguably more complicated than explaining why a course of
antibiotics is needed in the presence of a positive strep culture. The assess-
ment of human behavior can be daunting. Often, subjective measures are
relied upon when assessing human behavior, relying on our behavioral
descriptions of illness and clinical attempts to subjectively identify behav-
iors that meet symptom criteria. This chapter is written with the hopes of
increasing the reader’s familiarity and comfort level with the utility (and
limitations) of more objective psychological and neuropsychological tests
in diagnosis and treatment. Objective testing relies on scientific theory
102
and data to support the findings and conclusions drawn from an evalua-
tion. Issues related to the reliability and validity of standardized tests, test
selection, and cultural differences will be explored systematically to aid in
expanding the resources available to the practicing physician in the man-
agement of mental health disorders.
2. HISTORY OF TESTING
Human behavior encompasses a complex network of emotions and cogni-
tions working in concert to produce thoughts, feelings, and ideas. The
measurement of human thought poses many challenges and is fundamen-
tally obscured by the reality that we are using the very thing that we are
trying to measure (our own cognitions) to understand the behaviors,
beliefs, and intentions of others. With this in mind, it becomes essential
to use tools rooted in the scientific method as a framework to more
objectively evaluate and assess psychological processes. Psychometric
testing represents our attempts at quantifying and systematically explor-
ing behavior and has been used in the laboratory since the 19th century,
initially in measuring perception and other psycho–physiological pro-
cesses (e.g. Weber’s Law). As the research and tools evolved, the study of
human emotions and, later, human intelligence began to predominate.
Theories and developments in quantifying intelligence were the first focus
of testing. Developments were worldwide, including significant theoreti-
cal contributions from Sir Francis Galton in England, who proposed sta-
tistical concepts core to psychometrics; James Cattell in the United States,
who measured sensory and motor skills; Wilhelm Wundt and Emil
Kraepelin in Germany, who measured memory, perception, motor skills,
and perceptions; Carl Wernicke in Poland and Germany, who studied
brain localization to measure mental retardation; and importantly, Alfred
Binet and others in France, who developed formal methods of intellectual
measurement, leading to the Binet–Simon Scale in 1905.15
The first “clinical” application of psychological tests seen in the United
States was during World War I, where paper-and-pencil tasks aided in
classifying recruits for the military. Analysis of the scores obtained on
these “intelligence measures” formed the basis for the Intelligence
Quotient (IQ), which was represented by the equation Mental Age divided
3.2.1. Age
Many tests are developed for specific age ranges. The content of a test is
often designed to appeal to or be most appropriate for the age range
3.2.2. Gender
Many tests are developed without specific attention to gender, and norma-
tive data is analyzed post-collection to determine if gender is a significant
factor. However, some measures must account for gender from the begin-
ning of test development. Obviously if a test is being developed to address
a characteristic, a factor, or a quality belonging only to one sex, then it will
be normed for use with that sex and would be inappropriate to administer
otherwise. Some measures will require different administration methods
or normative groups that are based on gender. For example, due to the
differences in physiology of the sexes, many motor measures require
separate normative groups. Additionally, attitude measures will often
require separate normative groups. Although the questions asked on the
measures may be the same, the interpretation of how a person responds
may be directly influenced by gender and thus must be analyzed using
specific normative data.
Interpretation of test data should consider the possible interaction of
gender with other factors in the evaluation process. Even if all the tests
administered have accounted for sex differences within their normative
data, a person’s gender can also affect his or her engagement in the test
process itself. Rapport with the examiner, engagement, and effort should
always be considered in interpretation. Cultural differences may play a
significant role, interacting with gender to affect how a person responds to
the testing process and the individual examiner, a topic covered in more
detail later.
3.2.3. Education
Educational experiences can significantly affect a person’s interaction
with the testing process, as well as performance on a test. In the standardi-
zation process, educational levels can be quantified within a culture and
then treated as an extraneous variable if necessary. Many times, however,
educational experiences can vary so much, even within one country, for
example, that test developers rely on larger numbers in their sample size
to “average out” any extraneous effects of education.
Educational level becomes far more important to the normative process
in measures intended to quantify academic skills, however. Measures of
academic achievement can often be scored on age- or grade-based norma-
tive data. An examiner must understand the differences between these
normative groups and clinically determine which method of score inter-
pretation is appropriate in each clinical setting.
Most often, educational experience is considered a factor affecting the
reliability of test outcomes in an individual situation. In other words, a
clinician will need to think very differently about what tests to use and
how to interpret the results when working with a patient who has attended
test, in order to best understand how those levels can affect standard
scores. For example, if a test is designed in such a way that items for very
young children become difficult quickly and few items are assessed, lead-
ing to very small raw scores, only one or two questions may make very
large differences in that child’s standard score in comparison to results
from older children who may answer more questions.
Raw scores do not inform how a person compares to the larger popula-
tion. Therefore, raw scores are transformed statistically into “standardized
scores,” which place that raw performance onto the normal curve illus-
trated in Fig. 1.
Many options are available for reporting statistical scores. These
include the most basic of transformations, which numerically change
every score into a z-score, with a mean of zero and a standard deviation
of one. This is a cumbersome method for describing data, however, so
most measures further transform performances into either t-scores (with
a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10) or standard scores (with a
mean of 100 and standard deviation of either 10 or 15). Almost all tests
described in this chapter and used in most psychological and neuropsy-
chological testing utilize standard scores. Many test performances are also
described using percentile ranks, which can be best described as placing a
person’s performance at a rank out of 100. In other words, a performance
score at the 75th percentile means that the examinee performed better than
75 out of 100 other individuals. Labels are also often used to describe
performances, with the greatest number of people in the normative group
performing at what becomes “average,” and then modified labels being
used at each standard deviation either above or below average.
4. INTERNATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
The ethical use of standardized psychological tests across cultures and
languages has been addressed by a variety of organizations (Table 1).
Ultimately, psychologists are bound by law and the professional ethics of
their licensing organization to consider, use, administer, and interpret
measures in an appropriate and ethical manner at all times. This begins
with a constant evaluation of the psychologists’ own level of competency.
When considering testing someone of a different culture or nationality,
considering one’s own level of knowledge about that culture helps deter-
mine if one is able to adequately judge the appropriateness of a measure.
The level of acculturation a patient of a different culture has to the psy-
chologist’s culture is also an important factor. A psychologist practicing
The International Test Commission has stated that in order for a test to be
translated or adapted for use in other cultures, four domains must be
addressed, including the context of the test, the construction, the test adminis-
tration, and the documentation and score interpretation [www.intestcom.org].
4.1.1. Context
The context with which any test is used across cultures must account for
fundamental cultural differences, which can be quite broad. Educational
differences across cultures are primary. Western culture has a dominant
educational style that has significantly affected the development of many
standardized tests. Different cultures may have not only different educa-
tional styles but also different levels of item knowledge and format expo-
sures. Some cultures may not be familiar with multiple-choice formats,
for example. Religion, social practices, and psychological influences
can also significantly affect how a person responds to specific tests.
It becomes most important for the psychologist to consider what infor-
mation the test results will contribute and to ensure that any risks of test
bias are significantly lower than the benefits the results may provide.
4.1.2. Administration
The administration of a test has a significant impact on the person taking
the test in cross-cultural testing or any form of testing and is why stand-
ardization of the test administration process is so important. However, just
such standardization may negatively affect certain cross-cultural situa-
tions. A psychologist’s test administration style may be more or less palat-
able to other cultures for a variety of reasons interacting with sex,
personality, tone and volume of voice, and even personal appearance. The
development of rapport is vital to reliable and valid test administration.
If cultural difference causes problems with the development of rapport,
not even the most appropriate test will yield valid results. Further, at times
psychologists might use other professionals during the testing process,
which can further complicate cross-cultural issues.
Many psychologists utilize psychometrists, test administration profession-
als with advanced training in test administration. The test administrator must
4.1.3. Interpretation
The interpretation of test results in a cross-cultural setting is heavily influ-
enced by the issues discussed above regarding test creation and selection.
The use of appropriately normed measures should allow the clinician to
make appropriate interpretations about the patient’s skills. If measures have
been used that do not have similar normative groups as the patient, interpre-
tation becomes more difficult. Attempts must be made to account for cultural
influence in the person’s performance. For example, if a bilingual patient
from a primarily African culture was administered an English-normed intel-
lectual measure, the interpretation would need to explain that lower scores
would be expected on verbal measures due to cross-cultural impact.
Psychologists do not rely on one measure to make a definitive
diagnosis. During an evaluation process, each measure’s interpretation is
either supported or refuted by collaborating data, such as interview,
behavioral observations, or other test data. Interpretation in a cross-cul-
tural setting is no different. Particularly in situations where cultural influ-
ence may affect a patient’s performance, corroborating information
should be obtained to support any reported findings.
The documentation of the evaluation session should also carefully out-
line cultural considerations, including a thorough discussion of behavioral
observations and the rapport developed with the examiner. Effort and abil-
ity to engage in the testing process should be clearly explained. The
choice of tests should be outlined, along with rationale, and the findings
should include discussions of the cultural impact on the testing session.
Intelligence
Wechsler Intelligence Scales (preschool, child, adult, abbreviated, non-verbal)
Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales
Leiter International Performance Scales-Revised
Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-Second Edition
Memory
Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition
Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning-Second Edition
Language
Boston Naming Test
Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Fourth Edition
Visual and Motor
Grooved Pegboard Task
Attention and Executive Functions
Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-Second Edition
Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System
Personality
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Adolescent, Second
Edition Restructured)
Beck Inventories (Depression, Anxiety)
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Thematic Apperception Survey
Sentence Completion Survey
Academic
Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement-Third Edition
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third Edition
Wide Range Achievement Test-Fourth Edition
events than for events that occurred in the remote past. Many amnesiac
patients show preservation of certain cognitive abilities, and the presence
of intact global cognition can help define the syndrome. For example, mild
cognitive impairment by definition consists of normal global cognitive
abilities in the context of circumscribed deficits in aspects of memory.
Not surprisingly, a variety of measures exist to help the clinician evalu-
ate memory functions in patients ranging from early childhood through
senescence. Some measures assess span memory for auditory information
(e.g. Digit Span from the Wechsler scales) or visual span (e.g. Knox’s
Cube Test). In-depth measures also exist to assess memory for informa-
tion in context, often assessed through story memory. Rote verbal memory
can be assessed through list learning activities (e.g. Hopkins Verbal
Learning Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test). Although an inher-
ently more challenging prospect, measures have been designed to assess
visual memory and learning by having the examinee remember patterns,
draw objects from memory, recall faces, and recall information from pic-
tures. Again, the keen examiner will evaluate performance on various
memory measures in the context of the entire battery to determine where
the deficit truly lies. For example, a patient may present with unusual
symptoms of loss of autobiographical information with a lack of addi-
tional memory loss, as illustrated by testing. Such a presentation is often
more indicative of a conversion disorder or memory issues related to
emotional problems rather than neurological sequelae.
6.2.3. Language
Language is a necessary component in communication and is essential in
classroom and occupational success. The discipline of speech and lan-
guage pathology places a major emphasis on evaluating and treating
expressive and receptive language disorders in children and adults.
Psychologists and, more typically, neuropsychologists incorporate lan-
guage measures as a part of broader testing batteries to provide assess-
ment for specific referral questions, such as determining the type and
degree of aphasia, as well as to help answer questions related to develop-
mental language delays in the context of neurobehavioral syndromes
(e.g. autism spectrum disorders). Language tests can be brief and include
functions” are higher order processes that govern cognition and include
the abilities necessary to plan, organize, and generate goal-directed behav-
iors. This multidimensional construct has been conceptualized for some
time and has been more fully explored in the last few decades.11 Research
on executive functions continues to build momentum. It has long been
established through head injury research that executive deficits are a pre-
dictable consequence of damage to the prefrontal cortex; however, there
is mounting evidence that the frontal lobes may help with the recruiting
process of different brain regions to initiate a given task but that executive
dysfunction can be seen in a variety of lesions, including damage to sub-
cortical structures and the cerebellum.10 Due in part to the vast and com-
plex nature of executive functions, it should be no surprise that tests
designed to assess higher order cognition in the laboratory or clinic setting
remain far from perfect. At present, measures exist to reasonably assess
working memory, logical problem-solving, abstract reasoning, sequencing
and planning, and reactive flexibility, such as the Delis–Kaplan Executive
Function System [2001]. As a word of caution, it is essential to explore
and elicit examples of “real world” problem solving skills in the clinical
interview over relying too heavily on standardized measures of higher
order cognition. The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions
(BRIEF)6 is a rating questionnaire for children aged 5 through 18 designed
to assess behavioral regulation and metacognition on a day-to-day basis.
6.2.8. Effort
Individuals may have many reasons for not engaging adequately in the
testing process. Unlike medical tests that objectively measure aspects of a
person’s body without the person’s overt involvement, psychological test-
ing requires that a person put forth appropriate effort and remain moti-
vated for the process. At times, that motivation can be impacted by
secondary gain or less conscious, non-malicious psychological issues. In
order to evaluate whether a person is being impacted by subconscious
emotional issues, negativistic attitudes, or more overt secondary gain,
personality measures are often incorporated as part of an evaluation where
motivation is at question. Many self-report measures, such as the Behavior
Rating Inventory of Executive Function6 mentioned earlier, offer scoring
opportunities to determine how consistent the person’s responding has
been and indicators of how extreme the person’s responses may be in the
negative direction. More lengthy self-report personality measures, such as
the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2,2 offer more formal
validity scales, meant to help the clinician interpret the person’s motiva-
tion and engagement in the task. Additionally, more formal “malingering”
measures have been created and are available commercially. However,
poor performances on these measures can be complex to interpret. If a
person was not believed to be completely engaged or motivated toward
6.2.9. Competency
Psychologists are often called upon to perform evaluations of a person’s
competency in various settings. A common area in which competency is
questioned is in legal settings, where a defendant must be shown to be
competent to stand trial. Individuals not competent to stand trial often
participate in training and re-evaluations until they are shown to be able
to understand and discuss the legal process. However, several other areas
of competency are often evaluated by psychologists as well and range
throughout the lifespan. Parenting, self-care, and the care of others are
often questions of concern. Functional independence can involve compe-
tency issues, including requests to evaluate individuals for competency to
drive, manage finances, and make medical decisions for themselves and
for others. A psychologist would not rely on one singular or specific
evaluation measure to make such decisions. Recommendations for com-
petency would be made based on a cumulative decision inclusive of a
broad approach to evaluation.
7. ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Academic achievement testing is extremely useful in psychological, psy-
choeducational, and neuropsychological assessment, particularly when
evaluating children and adolescents. After all, much of the early feedback
we receive about our successes and failures germinates in the classroom.
Therefore, it is often important to address academic skill development as
part of more comprehensive testing, particularly to rule out specific learn-
ing disabilities that might have a greater chance of remediation if
addressed earlier along the academic path. Achievement measures tend to
be grouped into two categories: screening tools and broad-based assess-
ment. The former consists of brief measures of reading in isolation or
single-word decoding, spelling, and papers/pencil math as is the case for
the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-4). More elaborate academic
8. OCCUPATIONAL TESTING
Occupational or vocational testing is available from psychologists with
specialized training and focus of practice. An individual’s functional level
may be of particular interest in an occupational evaluation, and this could
also include quantifying handicaps or specific needs of individuals seek-
ing employment. However, specific and unique approaches to occupa-
tional testing include the development of individualized batteries for a
company, who then utilizes that battery to provide similar assessment
measures for all prospective employees. In particular this can allow for the
assessment of skills required for individual jobs, such as typing speed for
an administrative assistant or knowledge of medical terminology for a
transcriptionist. Occupational assessments are often used to try and pre-
dict who will perform best when placed in certain positions. Vocational
assessments more often refer to assessments used by an individual to help
ascertain where their skills would be best suited in the job market. This
can assist in planning for future vocational training, and treatment plan-
ning in rehabilitation facilities.
9. KEY POINTS
• Reading decoding often provides an accurate estimate of premorbid
intelligence in individuals with CNS dysfunction who have no prior
history of reading disability.
• Duration of anterograde memory loss is a far better predictor of brain
injury recovery than degree of retrograde memory impairment.
10. SELF-ASSESSMENT
10.1. Intellectual measures yield standard scores. For the most
part, when considering a standard score, the score
is based on:
(A) Mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3.
(B) Mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
(C) Mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
(D) Mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 10.
10.2. You have been given a rating scale to review that measures
apathy and notice several of the items appear more related
to self-esteem and social anxiety. Concern for whether
patients would believe this measure actually taps into
apathy relates to:
(A) Discriminate Validity.
(B) Convergent Validity.
(C) Predictive Validity.
(D) Face Validity.
(E) Internal Consistency.
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2002) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed, Text Revision. American Psychiatric Association,
Washington, DC.
2. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tellegen A, Kaemmer B. (2001)
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory — 2nd Edition Restructured.
The University of Minnesota Press.
3. Cronbach LJ. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
Psychometrika 16: 297–334.
4. De Klerk G. (2008) Cross-cultural testing. In: Born M, Foxcroft CD,
Butter R (eds), Online Readings in Testing and Assessment. International
Test Commission, Available at: http://www.intestcom.org/Publications/
ORTA.php
5. Foster D. (2008) Testing in other cultures and languages. In: Born M,
Foxcroft CD, Butter R (eds.), Online Readings in Testing and Assessment.
International Test Commission. Available at: http://www.intestcom.org/
Publications/ORTA.php
6. Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. (2000) Behavior Rating
Inventory of Executive Function. Psychological Assessment Resources,
Odessa, FL.
7. Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G. (1993) Wisconsin
Card Sorting Test Manual Revised and Expanded. Psychological Assessment
Resources, Inc.
8. Judd T, Capetillo D, Carrion-Baralt J, Marmol LM, Miguel-Montes LS,
Navarrete MG, Puente AE, Romero HR, Valdes J, NAN Policy and Planning
Committee. (2009) Professional considerations for improving the neuropsy-
chological evaluation of hispanics: A national academy of neuropsychology
education paper. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 24: 127–135.
9. Kopelman MD. (1995) The assessment of psychogenic amnesia. In:
Baddeley AD, Wilson BA, Watts FN (eds.), Handbook of Memory Disorders,
pp. 427–448, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
10. Koziol LF, Budding DE. (2009) Subcortical Structures and Cognition:
Implications for Neuropsychological Assessment. Springer, New York.
11. Lezak MD. (1982) The problem of assessing executive functions. Int J
Psychol 17: 281–297.
12. Leezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. (2004) Neuropsychological
Assessment, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, NY.
13. Lord FM, Novick MR. (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.
Addison-Welsley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
14. Spearman C. (1904) “General intelligence,” objectively determined and
measured. Am J Psychol 15: 201–293.
15. Sattler JM. (2001) Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications Fourth
Edition. Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc., San Diego, CA.
16. Taylor RL, Richards SB, Brady M. (2004) Mental Retardation: Historical
Perspectives, Current Practices, and Future Directions. Pearson-Allyn &
Bacon, Boston, MA.
Chapter 7
1. INTRODUCTION
Child and adolescent psychiatry involves the assessment and treatment of
disorders from birth up to the threshold of adulthood. Psychological
development plays a special role in child and adolescent psychiatry. Just
as the physiological behavior of children differ from that of adults, psy-
chopathologies may differ markedly from those in adults as well. Behavior
may have different functions at various ages and may be either normal or
abnormal at different stages. For example, fear of strangers is normal in
toddlers but is considered abnormal in adolescents, and toddlers naturally
exhibit more motor activity and motor restlessness than older children. In
other words, the frame of reference for what is normal and what is symp-
tomatic is strongly dependent on the developmental stage. In addition,
some phenomena that would represent a qualitative change in experience
in adults are completely normal variants of experience in childhood.
These include imaginary friends or conversations with such friends,
which are not at all rare in prepubescent children and are in no way to be
viewed as hallucinatory symptoms or signs of schizophrenia.
Developmental transitions (starting school, puberty, etc) are particularly
associated with the development of psychiatric disorders. The various
137
1.1. Development
The development of child and adolescent psychiatry as an autonomous
discipline has been influenced by many other disciplines, including edu-
cation, pediatric medicine, social work, and psychiatry. These have all had
an effect on the day-to-day practice as well as on research areas in child
and adolescent psychiatry. Today, child and adolescent psychiatry is an
autonomous discipline informed by a broad spectrum of research, but it
is also characterized by a particular multidisciplinarity. Collaborative
research projects involve fields such as pediatrics, neurology, neurobiol-
ogy, psychology, psychiatry, the social sciences, education, and the law.
1.3. Psychopharmacotherapy
The use of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents has increased
over the past several decades. Findings about patterns of use (age,
other hand, child and adolescent psychiatric care is sparse, and accessing
care for children is more difficult. It should be noted, however, that care
may be difficult to access in industrialized countries as well if, for exam-
ple, the health care system is not affordable by all the citizens.
development, seems to take cognizance of this fact and will, to the extent
foreseeable, orient itself to symptom complexes. Finally, the definition
of symptom complexes also more closely reflects the reality of child
and adolescent psychiatric clinical entities, which tend to develop out
of normal behavior and only become pathological as a result of their
intensity or a particular pervasiveness. This can be seen, for example, in
ADHD and in anxiety disorders. Fidgety, hypermotor, and impulsive
behavior are not generally abnormal in children; only the severity and
consistency of the behavior characterize it as a disorder. The same
applies to fear, shyness, and reticence toward strangers, which are not
per se pathological. However, these physiological fears become
pathological — a disorder — when they extend to important areas of life
such as school, where they impose limitations, including refusal to go to
school, inability to cooperate in school, and the like. Therefore, symptom
complexes and the resultant child and adolescent psychiatric disorders
will be described here. Because the disorders that occur most frequently
are not necessarily also the most severe, we will describe here the most
frequent and the most severe disorders typically found during childhood
and adolescence. The most frequent disorders are ADHD, conduct disor-
ders, depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders. Attachment disorders,
autistic disorders, and schizophrenic disorders are frequently among the
most severe. Typical disorders that initially manifest in childhood and
early adolescence include tic disorders and eating disorders. After
describing the epidemiology and etiology of these disorders as well as
risk and resilience factors, we will then chronologically describe the
symptom complexes as they occur during the development of the child.
2. EPIDEMIOLOGY
According to a variety of international studies, 6%–8% of all children
and adolescents manifest a psychiatric disorder. Psychopathological phe-
nomena, which may be symptomatic but do not yet fulfill the diagnostic
criteria for a psychiatric disorder according to the classifications estab-
lished in ICD-10 or DSM-IV, are far more frequent: approximately 20%
of all children and adolescents across the age spectrum exhibit such symp-
toms.14,18,23 Overall, psychiatric disorders in children appear to be
childhood stress also predicts further changes in the white matter of the
hippocampus independently of the genotype and that subjects with both
environmental and genetic risk factors are susceptible to stress-related
hippocampal changes. Structural brain changes due to stress represent part
of the mechanism by which the illness risk and outcome might be geneti-
cally mediated. These epigenetic effects of environmental factors have
been of special interest in research on psychiatric disorders, but to date,
few of these gene-environment interactions (G × E) have been sufficiently
replicated. Indeed, meta-analyses have raised doubts about the robustness
of even the most well-studied findings.39
The biopsychosocial model can today be viewed as an integral explana-
tory model for the development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and
adolescence. In this model, the overall risk results from biological factors
(such as underlying genetic risk factors), psychological factors (such as
negative, distorted, and learned thoughts patterns such as “I can’t do any-
thing”), and social factors (such as loss of a loving relationship, unem-
ployment). Of course, the weighting of these individual factors differs
from person to person in the development of the disorder. In fact, the
genesis of a psychiatric disorder is frequently the result of an interaction
between risk factors and resilience factors, so that a one-sided focus on
risk factors neglects the protective factors that may prevent that disorder
despite existing risk factors.
the pathogenesis of tic disorder even though no definitive locus has been
found. Genetic factors play a role in ADHD; twin studies have demon-
strated that the twin effect is greater than the influence of environmental
conditions. Alcohol and nicotine abuse by mothers during pregnancy are
also well-known risk factors. The dopaminergic system, especially the
striatum, is involved in the pathomechanism of ADHD, which is a striato-
frontal disorder. Polymorphisms that correlate with ADHD include the
10-repeat allele for the dopamine transporter (DAT 1) and the DRD 4
promoter (7-repeat allele for the DRD 4 and DRD 5 receptors). Furthermore,
SNAP25 seems to be involved in the development of ADHD. Functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have found abnormalities in
the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and in the anterior cingulus
(CGA) in subjects with ADHD. Individuals with ADHD, as compared
with unaffected subjects, had distinct activation of brain regions under
medication with methylphenidate. Executive functions and time percep-
tion are typically impaired in subjects with ADHD. In an fMRI study
conducted while subjects performed a combined spatial stimulus-response
compatibility (SRC) and time duration discrimination (TD) paradigm,
subjects with ADHD showed significantly reduced neuronal activity in the
left putamen during SRC testing and reduced fronto-cerebellar activation
during TD testing.38
hyperactivity, 4.7 times greater risk of antisocial behavior, and 1.7 times
higher risk of anxieties than those in the highest social class. It should be
noted that the cumulative effect of several risk factors (such as current
family conflict, dissatisfaction of parents in marriage, and social prob-
lems) leads to a dramatic increase in risk. In the presence of all three risks,
30.7% of children exhibit symptoms; if there are four risk factors, that
figure climbs to 47.7%. The recognition of high-risk groups is important
in terms of both prevention and timely intervention. In this respect, it has
been shown over the past several years that children receiving institution-
alized care (in foster care, youth service institutions, or an orphanage) are
at high risk, with markedly higher prevalence than the normal popula-
tion.34 Whereas fewer than 1% of children who grew up with their birth
mother suffer from an attachment disorder, according to ICD-10 criteria,
one study of a clinical population found that more than 25% of all children
from foster families and more than 10% of children in orphanages, who
have a higher average age, met one of the two diagnostic criteria for an
attachment disorder according to ICD-10.
3.3. Resilience
Since Emmy Werner’s Kauai study, which followed the 1955 birth cohort
on the island of Kauai, it has been known that resilience factors have a
crucial effect in balancing out risk factors and determining whether a child
develops in a positive direction in spite of the presence of many risk fac-
tors. In the Kauai study, approximately one-third of the children with risk
factors developed no disorders and was even happier and more contented
than low-risk peers. Numerous twin and adoption studies have confirmed
the importance of resilience. Resilience is the process of biopsychosocial
adaptation and the resultant emotional resilience of children to biological
and psychosocial developmental risks.30 Resilience is best recognized by
a high level of functioning and/or disorders that are either absent or mild
in persons in whom the opposite might be expected. Resilience factors
may be inherent to the child in the form of personality traits such as curi-
osity, extroversion, and the like, or be the result of family traits. The qual-
ity of interaction in terms of child-rearing behavior or warmth in the
parent–child relationship plays a major role here. Factors in the social
Genetic predisposition
Attachment experiences
Other socialization
conditions
4. SPECIAL DISORDERS
4.1. Attachment disorders
4.1.1. Phenomenology
According to ICD-10 (F94) and DSM-IV (313.89, Reactive Attachment
Disorder of Infancy or Early Childhood), attachment disorder describes
children’s behavior that greatly deviates from attachment behavior
that would be expected according to the attachment theory paradigm. In
most social contexts, children with early childhood attachment disorders
exhibit developmentally inappropriate behavior. For example, they fail to
seek contact with their attachment figure in situations of uncertainty and
stress, or they fail to respond with what may be a tentative, though none-
theless organized, strategy, by means of which they may to some extent
regulate their internal stress. Rather, though clearly stressed in such situ-
ations, they do not seek out comfort and reassurance from their attach-
ment figure, or they remain not merely distanced but may even seek out a
strange person rather than their trusted primary caregiver (Table 1). There
are two types of attachment disorders: “Reactive attachment disorder of
childhood” (F94.1) and “Disinhibited attachment disorder of childhood”
(F94.2).
4.1.2. Treatments
Pharmacotherapy
In severe cases of hyperkinetic behavior, an off-label medication with
stimulants may be beneficial.
Psychotherapy
No therapeutic treatment has to date proved adequately effective in treat-
ing children with attachment disorders. However, it is indisputable that the
presence of an emotionally reliable and constant attachment figure is
indispensable to the success of any treatment. Therefore, it is important to
promote parent–child interaction, if possible with standardized programs,
while simultaneously working with the parents. More advanced psycho-
therapy should be considered only after emotional stabilization has been
achieved through the establishment of a stable relationship and concurrent
work with the parents.
In fact, a child with an attachment disorder places increased require-
ments on the (foster) parents’ child rearing and relational skills. As a
result, outpatient therapeutic support services should be considered in
addition to regular consultation sessions.
Children with a diagnosis of attachment disorder have a rather unfa-
vorable prognosis. Many of the children originally diagnosed with a dis-
inhibited attachment disorder are diagnosed with personality disorders in
adolescence or early adulthood.40 Children have age-dependent ways of
reacting to traumatic events and neglect. Children with repeated trauma
and a background of early neglect often do not show the full characteris-
tics of adult posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but show a
Table 2. (Continued )
Rett syndrome Normal psychomotor development within first five
months.
Between five months and the age of four years: Loss of
targeted hand movements, communication disorder,
disorder of social interaction, barely coordinated,
impaired gait.
Psychomotor slowing and speech disorder (expressive
and receptive).
Asperger syndrome Similar symptoms as with typical autism; but
No speech development disorder/cognitive
developmental delay.
4.2.2. Treatment
Pharmacotherapy
Drugs are administered mainly to treat (auto-)aggressive behavior and
impulsivity, and in some cases mood and hyperactivity. Antipsychotics,
SSRIs, and methylphenidate can be efficacious, even if most pharmaco-
therapy will be used off-label. The Autism Network of the Research Units
on Pediatric Psychopharmacology (RUUP) studied risperidone for core
symptoms of autism. Risperidone led to significant improvements in the
restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and
activities of autistic children but did not significantly change their deficit
in social interaction and communication.22
Psychotherapies
Treatment includes counseling of parents, which is essential to provide
them with information and afford them relief. Knowing what is the matter
with their child is very important to parents because they may have felt for
a long time that something was wrong. In US studies, the median age at
diagnosis ranged between 3 and 7; it normally takes about three years
from the time the parents first notice the problem to the final medical
diagnosis. Behavioral interventions such as “Treatment and Education of
Autistic and related Communication-handicapped Children” (TEACH),
the Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) of Lovaas, and other treatments are
very expensive and resource and time intensive. A review of the effective-
ness of therapies is provided in Ospina et al.26
stable for more than six months. Children with ADHD are likely to have
problems in school and with peer relationships even though they have
average or above-average IQs. Hyperkinetic behavior is generally reduced
in adolescents, disorganization being more dominant in adolescents and
young adults.
4.3.2. Treatment
Pharmacotherapy
Stimulant medication is the treatment of choice for ADHD (level of evi-
dence I). In cases of severe symptoms and essential impairment of the
child by its symptoms, pharmacotherapy is effective. According to most
guidelines, pharmacotherapy of ADHD should be embedded in a multi-
modal treatment setting, which also includes parent trainings and so on.
Psychotherapy
Therapeutic options may be family-, school-, or child-oriented. Training
parents in parenting skills is effective but shows a high degree of variabil-
ity from parent to parent. The programs are focused on improving parent–
child interaction and contingency management. Interventions in school
also show immediate effects, particularly when they implement routines
in school, encourage physical activity that focuses the child’s attention,
and improve environmental conditions (“do not place a child with ADHD
in the last row”). Cognitive behavioual treatment (CBT) programs are the
most effective child-oriented psychotherapeutic option for treating
ADHD, the most effective elements of CBT in ADHD being contingency
management in pre-schoolers. Parent-training should be the first-line
intervention and seems to be most effective, while these CBT interven-
tions are aimed at improving impulsivity control and attention to relevant
stimuli. Psychotherapy generally requires adjuvant medication to work.
Neuro-feedback is another promising psychotherapeutic option whose
effectiveness is currently being studied.
Differential diagnosis
Because symptoms are clear and unambiguous, differential diagnosis is
straightforward. Comorbid diagnoses of ADHD, emotional or affective
4.4.2. Treatment
i. Pharmacotherapy
In cases of increased impulsivity, treatment with atypical antipsychotics
can help the patients gain some control over their impulses (in case of low
intelligence, level of evidence II). Serotonergic medication (SSRI) is used
both to reduce impulsivity and, in the case of comorbid affective disorders,
to improve mood and thereby to reduce bad temper. No real pharmaco-
therapeutic options are available to treat conduct disorder causally or
totally.
ii. Psychotherapy
Although CD and ODD are common disorders, no strong comparative
clinical trial literature exists. Therapeutic interventions are mainly
family-based (modification of parenting style, implementation of
adequate and consistent rules in the family, etc; level of evidence I).12
Multisystemic therapy is one approach; it is very challenging, but with
first results both on its efficacy and limits of effectiveness.7 The patient-
centered approach is similar to that used to treat ADHD with token
systems and self-management elements (level of evidence II). Approaches
to conduct disorder often require involvement of the youth welfare sys-
tem with long-term intervention. In severe cases with high impulsivity,
treatment with atypical antipsychotics may be beneficial to improve
impulsivity, even though these interventions are currently approved only
for low-IQ patients.
of the disorder should be before the age of 18. The same is true for
chronic motor or vocal tic disorder (ICD-10 F95.1; DSM IV 307.22).
Simple motor tics include eye blinking or winking, grimacing and
frowning, as well as headshaking and shoulder shrugging. Convulsive
contractions of the diaphragm, stomach, or trunk muscles are also con-
sidered a simple motor tic. Complex motor tics, by contrast, include
hopping, treading, jumping, scratching, and hitting. Simple vocal or
phonetic tics include throat clearing, coughing, spitting, and grunting
and may include excessively loud inspiratory and expiratory breath
sounds. Palilalia (repetition of one’s own words), echolalia (repetition of
another person’s words), and rarely coprolalia (obscene and socially
unacceptable words) are examples of complex vocal tics. The cardinal
symptoms of Tourette syndrome include motor and phonetic tics
(because not all sounds made by patients with Tourette syndrome are
actually vocalized, the term “vocal tic” has been largely abandoned). The
extent of the tics may be highly variable. Days may go by without symp-
toms, followed by more severe tic episodes. Motor tics are understood to
mean sudden, rapid, explosive movements, often involving several mus-
cle groups. These movements may appear to be stereotypic, but they
often are non-rhythmic and repeat in series. Phonetic tics are associated
with a sound (Table 5).
Many patients report a premonitory urge before the tic. This urge
becomes so unbearable that the tic must be expressed overtly. Patients
can sometimes suppress the tic for a limited period of time, which is
why some children with tics are not diagnosed. Once at home, however,
the tics may become all the more pronounced. Some are well
able to suppress their tics when doing tasks that require a high level of
concentration, but the tics may be much more pronounced in stressful
situations. The extent of inter-individual differences is illustrated by the
fact that for some people, the tics may subside almost completely when
they are on vacation or relaxing, while for others, tics increase in these
situations.
In chronic tic disorders, motor tics may develop as early as kinder-
garten age. Phonetic tics often start several years later. The disease
becomes manifested in 96% of affected children before the age of 11.
It is often most severe between the ages of 12 and 14. Data about com-
plete remission during adolescence differ widely. Tic symptoms seem
to disappear in approximately a third of adolescent patients, regress
markedly in another third, and remain constant in the remaining
patients.
Complex motor tics are difficult to distinguish from obsessive-com-
pulsive behavior. The transitions between the two are sometimes poorly
defined. Checklists like the Yale Tourette Syndrome Symptom List
(YTSSL) or the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) can be helpful
in the differential diagnosis. It is important to rule out chorea minor
(Sydenham) as well as post-infection autoimmune processes (“Pediatric
autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal
infection,” PANDAS). Stereotypic movement disorders in severe devel-
opmental disorders are easy to distinguish, because tics seem arrhyth-
mic in comparison. If the disorder develops after the age of 18, rare
causes, such as drug-induced tic disorder, neuroacanthocytosis, and
Wilson’s disease, should be considered. There is a high comorbidity (up
to 90%) with ADHD and obsessive-compulsive disorders (the dysregu-
lation of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the cortiko-striato-
thalamokortical circuit can be assumed as the pathway). Further relevant
comorbid psychiatric disorders are anxiety and mood disorders, which
can be the consequence of the social stigma caused by the symptoms of
tic disorder. For disruptive disorders, which also frequently occur with
tic disorder, the lack of control over impulsivity can be seen as a
pathway.
4.5.2. Treatments
i Pharmacotherapy
Several drug treatments are currently available if the tic symptoms lead to
considerable impairment in terms of psychosocial functioning or if, for
example, loud noises make participation in school difficult. Haloperidol
has shown evidence of efficacy (level of evidence I), but it cannot be con-
sidered a first-line medication because of its side effects. In Europe,
tiaprid (level of evidence II; selective dopamine D2 and D3 antagonist) is
frequently used to treat tics. Other substances include risperidone (level of
evidence II; potent 5HT2A receptor and dopamine D2 receptor antago-
nist). Initial studies are available for aripiprazole (partial agonist D2 and
5HT1A receptor). Atomoxetine (inhibition of presynaptic noradrenalin
transporters; evidence level II-III) may be helpful in concurrent ADHD.
Occasionally, atomoxetine may exacerbate tic disorders (stimulant effect).
Serotonergic drugs can be helpful in OCD, the common comorbidity in
tics, but no RCT about effects is available.
ii. Psychotherapy
If symptoms are mild or moderate, psychoeducation may lessen the tic
disorder. Therapeutically, it is important to educate the patients, their par-
ents, and other relevant school personnel, because this helps to minimize
stigmatization and correct wrong ideas, such as that tics are voluntary.
Behavioral therapy programs such as “habit reversal training” (HRT) and
“comprehensive behavioural intervention for tics” (CBIT) may be quite
effective according to study data. Relaxation programs such as progres-
sive muscle relaxation are also applied in tic disorders. In younger chil-
dren, psychotherapy programs are hardly applicable because the patients
are seldom motivated to take part in such elaborate techniques.
4.6. Stuttering
4.6.1. Phenomenology: Signs and symptoms
Stuttering (ICD-10: F98.5; DSM IV: 307.0) is a disorder affecting coor-
dination of speech. Symptoms are syllable repetition and blockades of
speech (involuntary). A high genetic aspect of this disorder can be
assumed, because stuttering appears at a higher frequency within fami-
lies of affected patients. However, in addition to a genetic component,
further aspects have an influence on the risk of stuttering: In homozy-
gote twins one may be affected, not the other. Subjects affected by stut-
tering have often a delayed development of speech; auditory, other
sensory, and word motor deficits may be connected with stuttering. No
mono-causal etiology of stuttering has been found. Prevalence of stutter-
ing shall be about 5% (2:1 boys: girls). Mostly the symptoms are present
before the age of six years (50% already between the age of three and
five years).
Typical symptoms of stutterers are sound and syllable repetitions,
prolongation of sound, interjections, pauses within a word (broken
words), audible or silent blocking (filled or unfilled pauses in speech),
circumlocutions (word substitutions to avoid problematic words), words
produced with an excess of physical tension and monosyllabic whole-
word repetitions.
DSM-IV considers in the diagnostic criteria the disability caused by
stuttering: “Disturbance in fluency interferes with academic or occupa-
tional achievement or with social communication.” DSM-IV also requires
coding stuttering on Axis III, if a speech-motor or sensory deficit or a
neurological condition is present.
4.6.3. Treatment
i. Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy is not very successful in stuttering, even if haloperidol
or second generation antipsychotics and botulinum (i.m.) have been used
for treatment. Long-term efficacy of these substances is not proven.
ii. Psychotherapies
Psychotherapeutic interventions are complex and show no fast or easy
success. A metronome as aid for the rhythm of speech can be helpful
and can be used as an exercise for prolongation. Modification of stutter-
ing aims at changing secondary reaction on stuttering as anxiety.
Fluency shaping wants to modify speech (learning new patterns of
speech), which is adapted step by step to normal speech. Combined
treatment approaches shall be most efficacious. Evidence for fluency
shaping is level III for children; combined therapy has evidence levels
between Ib-III. The best evaluated therapy program (for preschool chil-
dren) is the Lidcombe program.11,25 It is a behavioral treatment with
contingencies.
4.7.6. Schizophrenia
Early-onset schizophrenia (EOS) is defined as psychosis with onset
before the age of 18, and very-early-onset (VEOS) as schizophrenia with
onset before the age of 14. VEOS is very rare and EOS is also rare in
comparison to adult onset. Onset in childhood and adolescence causes the
most severe impairment, which can be explained both by neurobiological
factors that affect the developing brain and by social factors, because
these patients have generally not yet finished their education and often
have no stable peer relations, friends, and the like. Symptoms are the
same as in adults; the hebephrenic form of psychosis is more frequent
than in adults.
On the basis of the recognition that the period of untreated disorder
(PUD) is relevant to the outcome, research has in recent years focused
on psychosis risk syndrome (PRS) for the early detection of prodromal
symptoms.3 Results were initially encouraging with regard to the predic-
tive validity of PRS criteria, but they were too variable over long-term
examination. As a result, there are to date no clear-cut recommendations
for the pharmacological treatment of these (insufficiently predictive)
symptoms, even though they have been treated with atypical antipsy-
chotics in several studies. Atypical antipsychotics should be used to
treat EOS, even though first-generation antipsychotics are also effective.
Until the Treatment of Early Onset Schizophrenia Study (TEOSS) was
published, there was hope that second generation antipsychotics (SGA)
would cause fewer side effects; however, rates of side effects are also
high under SGA, although the types of side effects are different from
those under first generation antipsychotics (FGA).34 According to
TEOSS, there is no difference in treatment compliance under SGA
or FGA.
6. KEY POINTS
• In the clinical examination, information about the disorder should be
obtained from several sources (parents, teachers, etc).
• It is crucially important to talk with the child or adolescent separately
from the parents during clinical examination.
• Cognitive behavioral therapy is the most effective therapeutic approach
in both externalizing and internalizing disorders in children.
• Family therapy will be helpful in many cases, especially in family-
related disorders such as eating disorders.
• It is of the utmost importance to inform parents and patients about the
approval status of proposed medications.
• Distinguishing between self-harming behavior and suicidal behavior
is essential for treatment planning, despite the fact that self-harming
behavior increases the risk of suicide attempts.
• Screening patients with externalizing disorders for internalizing
symptoms (depression, traumatic experience) is important to deter-
mine comorbidities and ensure that they are appropriately treated.
• Individualized, evidence-based multimodal treatment plans should be
provided to each patient and discussed with both the parents and the
patient.
7. CASE STUDIES
7.1. ADHD
An eight-year-old boy at the time of presentation already had to repeat
a class. He lags behind in school. He has a long history of problems in
school, including forgetting homework, disciplinary problems, and dis-
ruptive talking in the classroom. He is extremely impulsive, and he is
unable to wait his turn when playing with friends. He always wants to
be first. As a result, only a few children are willing to play with him; he
is seldom invited by others to take part in activities. His soccer coach
has replaced him on the team because he drags down the team and
argues constantly. His mother tells the doctor that he concentrates
intently for hours when playing computer games but ignores her when
she tries to get him to do homework. He jumps out of his seat at meal-
times. He lost several tote bags, watches, and a fair amount of money
last year.
Stimulant medication was prescribed after he was diagnosed with
ADHD (initially a short-acting preparation for titration, then a long-
acting preparation after it was determined that a dosage of 0.8 mg per
kg body weight was appropriate), and he and his parents attended par-
enting training. Although his IQ was 113, he was an underachiever. His
performance in school improved under medication. He was able to listen
to the teacher and was less impulsive (even though he sometimes con-
tinued to talk loudly out of turn). He joined a swimming team where he
made some new friends who did not know him when he was untreated.
They invite him regularly to their birthday parties and other activities.
In the afternoon, hypermotor behavior recurs, but because it was not
clinically significant, he and his parents decided not to increase the
dosage.
7.2. Autism
A six-year-old boy is presented after he tried to push another kindergarten
student down a set of stairs. He had not done this in the course of a strug-
gle or argument. He stated that he merely wanted to see what would
happen when the boy fell. The parents reported a long history of abnormal
behavior with hypermotor behavior and a lack of responsiveness to praise
or punishment. He was never interested in snuggling with the mother or
having any intimacy with the parents. The child was never separated from
parents in early childhood. He has always lived with his family. The par-
ents have another child (girl + four years) whose behavior is completely
normal. The father was 42 and the mother 39 when the boy was born.
Speech development was slightly delayed. He is especially interested in
buses and trains (particularly streetcars). He has no friends, but this does
not seem to bother him.
In the clinical examination, he never looked directly at the examiner,
even when spoken to. His voice was elevated and monotonous. He did not
respond in conversation, instead repeating the examiner’s questions. He
exhibited extreme hypermotor and impulsive behavior (running in and out
of the room several times and the like). His IQ, 83, was somewhat subav-
erage, and his motor development was slightly delayed.
REFERENCES
1. Barkley RA. (2002) Major life activity and health outcomes associated with
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 36: 10–15.
2. Cassidy J, Shaver PR. (2008) Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research,
and Clinical Applications, 2nd ed. The Guilford Press, NY.
3. Correll CU, Hauser M, Auther AM, Cornblatt BA. (2010) Research in people
with psychosis risk syndrome: A review of the current evidence and future
directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51(4): 390–431.
4. Freitag CM. (2007) The genetics of autistic disorders and its clinical rele-
vance: A review of the literature. Mol Psychiatry 12(1): 2–22.
5. Frodl F, Reinhold E, Koutsouleris N, Donohoe G, Bondy B, Reiser M,
Möller H-J, Meisenzahl EM. (2010) Childhood stress, serotonin transporter
gene and brain structures in major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology
35: 1383–1390.
6. Goodyer I, Dubicka B, Wilkinson P, et al. (2007) Selective serotonin reup-
take inhibitors (SSRIs) and routine specialist care with and without cognitive
behaviour therapy in adolescents with major depression: Randomised con-
trolled trial. BMJ 335(7611): 142.
7. Henggeler SW, Sheidow AJ. (2003) Conduct disorder and delinquency.
J Marital Fam Therapy 29(4): 505–522.
8. Hölling H, Erhart M, Ravens-Sieberer U, Schlack R. (2007)
Verhaltensauffälligkeiten bei kindern und jugendlichen: Erste ergebnisse aus
dem kinder- und jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt
50: 784–793.
9. Holtmann M, Goth K, Wockel L, Poustka F, Bolte S. (2008) CBCL-pediatric
bipolar disorder phenotype: Severe ADHD or bipolar disorder? J Neural
Transm 115(2): 155–161.
10. Jensen PS, Arnold LE, Swanson JM, Vitiello B, Abikoff HB, Greenhill LL,
Hechtman L, Hinshaw SP, Pelham WE, Wells KC, Conners CK, Elliott GR,
Epstein JN, Hoza B, March JS, Molina BS, Newcorn JH, Severe JB, Wigal T,
Gibbons RD, Hur K. (2007) 3-year follow-up of the NIMH MTA study. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46(8): 989–1002.
11. Jones M, Onslow M, Packman A, Williams S, Ormond T, Schwarz I,
Gebski V. (2005) Randomised controlled trial of the lidcombe programme of
early stuttering intervention. BMJ 331: 659.
12. Kazdin AE. (2000) Treatments for aggressive and antisocial children. Child
Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 9(4): 841–858.
13. Kendall PC, Hedtke KA. (2006) Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxious
Children: Therapist Manual, 3rd ed. (Child/Individual treatment manual),
Workbook Publishing, Ardmore, PA.
14. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE.
(2005) Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disor-
ders in the National comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry
62(6): 593–602.
15. Kim-Cohen J, Caspi A, Taylor A, Williams B, Newcombe R, Craig IW,
Moffitt TE. (2006) MAOA, maltreatment, and gene-environment interaction
predicting children’s mental health: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Mol
Psychiatry 11(10): 903–913.
16. Koelch M, Schnoor K, Fegert JM. (2008) Ethical issues in psychopharmacol-
ogy of children and adolescents. Curr Opin Psychiatry 21: 598–605.
17. Kölch M, Ludolph A, Plener PL, Fangerau H, Vitiello B. (2010). Safeguarding
children’s rights in psychopharmacological research: Ethical and legal
issues. Curr Pharm Des 16(22): 2398–2406.
18. Laming WHL. (2009) The Protection of Children in England: A Progress
Report, pp. 98, Laming, Stationery Office, London.
19. Lloyd-Richardson EE, Perrine N, Dierker L, Kelley ML. (2007) Characteristics
and functions of non-suicidal self injury in a community sample of adoles-
cents. Psychol Med 37: 1183–1192.
20. March JS, Silva S, Petrycki S, et al. (2007) The treatment for adolescents
with depression study (TADS): Long-term effectiveness and safety out-
comes. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64: 1132–1143.
21. Markham JA, Morris JR, Juraska JM. (2007) Neuron number decreases in
the rat ventral, but not dorsal, medial prefrontal cortex between adolescence
and adulthood. Neuroscience 144(3): 961–968.
22. McDougle CJ, Scahill L, Aman MG, McCracken JT, Tierney E, Davies M,
Arnold LE, Posey DJ, Martin A, Ghuman JK, Shah B, Chuang SZ,
Swiezy NB, Gonzalez NM, Hollway J, Koenig K, McGough JJ. Ritz L,
Vitiello B. (2005) Risperidone for the core symptom domains of autism:
Results from the study by the autism network of the research units on pedi-
atric psychopharmacology. Am J Psychiatry 162(6): 1142–1148.
Chapter 8
1. INTRODUCTION
Schizophrenia is arguably the most severe and least well understood of all
mental disorders. It is a highly debilitating condition. It is also a highly
stigmatizing condition. In one recent survey of over 700 people with
schizophrenia spanning across 27 countries, 70% of patients indicated that
they would not declare their illness in public. Moreover, 29% of patients
felt as if they had been discriminated against when applying for a job.20
Schizophrenia is largely considered a disorder of the brain, in the sense
that there are demonstrable — albeit remarkably subtle — brain changes
that are seen in large patient-control comparisons (but not evident on an
individual patient’s brain scan). Although the frontal and temporal lobes
are perhaps most frequently implicated in the pathology of schizophrenia,
in truth, studies over time have found changes of some sort in virtually
every area of the brain.9,17,18 Macroscopically, these appear as loss of
tissue — either failure of the brain tissue to develop or, alternatively, a
progressive loss of tissue overtime. Microscopically, there are aberrant
brain cells as well as abnormal structures (e.g. lack of spines on synaptic
neurons) in discrete brain cells. Collectively these features point to
schizophrenia being a disorder of faulty brain development — i.e. a
184
2. EPIDEMIOLOGY
Worldwide, the occurrence of schizophrenia is just under 1% of the
population. However, higher rates of psychosis are observed among
British of an African–Caribbean descent, among those from Croatia, and
those from Southern India.18 There is also a curious winter birth excess of
schizophrenia — that is, people with schizophrenia from the northern
hemisphere are more likely to be born in the first three months of the
year; the reverse is true for the Southern hemisphere. Another highly
reducible finding is that about 1 in 5 people with schizophrenia have
experienced some complication at birth — that is, preterm labor, fetal
distress, anoxia, head trauma during delivery, or prenatal infections.
Although none of these effects are either specific to schizophrenia or of
themselves (alone) are powerful enough to explain why schizophrenia
occurs, collectively they point to events in early fetal life as powerful
3. ETIOLOGY
One very clear observation on the etiology of schizophrenia is that it runs
in families. Monozygotic twins have a 47% risk of both twins developing
schizophrenia, while this risk drops to 27% among dizygotic twins.
A child born to a parent with schizophrenia has a 14% morbid risk,
whereas a child of parents who both carry a diagnosis of schizophrenia
has a 46% morbid risk of developing schizophrenia. Thus, genetic influ-
ences are powerful, but they do not tell the whole story. Other factors —
acting alone or in some (gene-environmental) combination — are also
important.16 As an example, it is estimated that people who smoke can-
nabis are between 2 and 4.5 times more likely than non-smokers to
develop schizophrenia. It remains unclear whether cannabis is simply a
trigger — that is, bringing on schizophrenia in somebody who is already
(perhaps genetically) vulnerable — or whether it can actually cause
schizophrenia. Additionally, there is on-going debate as to whether schiz-
ophrenia and mood disorder, especially bipolar disorder, are similar dis-
orders, with an overlap in heritability and genetic findings between the
conditions.6
Table 2. The International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) criteria for
the diagnosis of schizophrenia.
A minimum of one very clear symptom (and usually ≥2 if less clear-cut) from groups
(a)–(d) below, or symptoms from ≥2 of the groups (e)–(h), which have been present
for most of the time during a period of one month or more:
Thought echo, insertion, withdrawal, broadcasting.
Delusions of control, influence, passivity; delusional perception.
Hallucinatory voices of running commentary, third-person discussion, or other types
of voices coming from some part of the body.
Persistent delusions of other kinds that are culturally inappropriate and completely
impossible.
Persistent hallucinations in any modality; daily for weeks/months, or accompanied
by half-formed non-affective delusions, or with persistent overvalued ideas.
Breaks in thought fluency, i.e. incoherence, irrelevant speech, neologisms.
Catatonic behavior; excitement, stupor, Mutism, posturing, waxy flexibility, negativism.
Negative symptoms; apathy, paucity of speech, blunted emotions, social withdrawal;
not due to depression or neuroleptic medication.
A significant and consistent change in the overall quality of some aspects of personal
behavior (loss of interest, social withdrawal, aimlessness).
Subtypes: paranoid, hebephrenic, catatonic, undifferentiated, post-schizophrenic
depression, residual, simple schizophrenia.
it provides the patient and family with clarity about the diagnosis and it
reassures them that the condition has been thoroughly assessed. The fre-
quent co-occurrence of illicit drug abuse around the time of the first psy-
chotic episode is another consideration that is very complex. Family
members are often left confused as to ‘the chick and the egg’ effect: did
the drug abuse bring on the psychosis or did the psychosis lead to the drug
abuse? It is best clinically to remain circumspect, to acknowledge the
potential deleterious effects of drug abuse, and to revisit the diagnosis
months later.
4. TREATMENT
4.1. General considerations
Schizophrenia is a difficult condition to treat and should be treated by
specialists.5,16 Because lack of insight into psychosis is so common —
even in the face of the serious personal consequences (e.g. incarceration)
of untreated psychosis and bizarre behavior — it is really hard to keep
people engaged in treatment. On one hand, many people discontinue treat-
ment over time because they do not believe they are ill. On the other hand,
it has been observed that people who gain insight directly following their
first psychotic episode are at risk of harming themselves because they
become demoralized about their plight.
The burden and emotional toll of this condition on family members is
enormous. Families need a lot of support. The range of services available
to support patients and their families differ substantially from country to
country. In China, for instance, people are usually hospitalized for months
during their first psychotic episode. The condition is highly stigmatizing,
and families have great difficulty supporting their loved one. In many
developing countries, families provide great support — even to the point
of (inadvertently) delaying the person’s access to care because psychotic
symptoms are well tolerated by family members. In many countries with
socialized medicine, people get access to a range of services for free and
they are afforded benefits (including housing support) for their illness.
In the United States, services are fragmented and the extent of social sup-
port across the continuum of illness needs (clinical, housing, vocational,
social) are more limited than they should be.8 Services also differ in the
extent to which they view the person with schizophrenia as a patient who
is a recipient of services versus a person who is able to use services to take
more personal charge of the illness. The latter is a more patient-focused,
recovery-based perspective. Some countries are more recovery-based in
their mental health services than others, which remain traditional in their
service orientation and delivery.5 There is growing interest in recovery-
based approaches to care (Table 4), including the involvement of people
who are themselves recovering (called peer support specialists) as part
of the multidisciplinary team that helps the person maximize his or her
abilities and minimize disabilities.
they are being harmed). Whatever the reason, it is hard to treat schizophre-
nia when the person either refuses medication treatment and/or goes off
the medications. Giving medication in the form of a long-acting injection
(LAI) — which is typically effective for 2–4 weeks — is an alternative. In
the United States, approximately 12% of patients are receiving an LAI of
antipsychotic medication, whereas in Europe the rates of use may be as
high as 50% of patients.
The pharmacology of antipsychotic medications is complex.16 Virtually
every antipsychotic has in common an affinity for dopamine (D2) recep-
tors, with most drugs having a strong antagonism of D2 receptors.
Classical receptor occupancy theory posits that at least a 60% D2 occu-
pancy is required for antipsychotic efficacy but that motor side effects
(extrapyramidal side effects such as restlessness) will occur at occupancy
rates of 75% and above. On the other hand, newer antipsychotics seem to
belie this theory because they have low D2 occupancy rates (e.g. 28% for
clozapine, 48% for quetiapine) and yet these drugs are clearly effective
antipsychotics. This observation challenges our field to look for other
explanations for antipsychotic activity — perhaps some balance between
D2 and other dopamine receptor classes, perhaps some moderating effect
of glutamatergic receptor agonism, or perhaps even the gestalt of multiple
receptor occupancy effects involving dopamine, serotonin, nonadrenergic,
cholinergic, and histaminergic receptors. All currently available antipsy-
chotics share an affinity for D2 receptors (although this affinity also differs
widely across drugs), yet they are also quite disparate in their effects on
these other receptors. The drugs have merely, for convenience, been clas-
sified into first generation antipsychotic (FGA) and second generation
antipsychotic medications (SGAs). SGAs were originally conceived as
clinically superior to FGAs. Apart from clozapine, this distinction has
become less clear overtime. In the United States, SGAs are the predomi-
nant choice of drugs. In European countries, there is a greater balance
of use between FGAs and SGAs. The relative merits of these two
classes — and of each drug — remains hotly debated by our field.10,16
FGAs are considered to have more motor side effects and to have limited
beneficial effect upon negative or cognitive features of schizophrenia.
SGAs were considered to have more therapeutic benefit beyond amelio-
rating positive symptoms, including reducing negative symptoms and
SGA or FGA
Inadequate response
Inadequate response
Inadequate response
6. PROGNOSIS
Schizophrenia is a life-shortening condition, either by suicide or by
comorbid physical illness, which is now a major consideration for treat-
ment, especially given the higher liability to weight gain and metabolic
disturbances during treatment with SGAs.15 Although some patients
recover over time, many/most patients remain to some extent sympto-
matic and/or with impaired functioning. Approximately 4% of people who
develop schizophrenia end up committing suicide — most often, early on
in their illness. The outcome is better in developing countries.11 Our field
remains optimistic that intervening earlier — and with more effective
treatments — might result in an attenuated illness course and improved
overall prognosis. Selecting treatments that target key components of the
illness, like cognition, remains another promising approach.7 Clinicians
also look forward to improved, newer medications that might offer better
efficacy and lower side effects.2 Psychiatry is also poised to embrace per-
sonalized medicine. Initial pharmacogenetic studies in schizophrenia give
cause for cautious optimism that over time we will be better able to match
‘drug to patient.’
7. KEY POINTS
• Schizophrenia, although its onset is typically demarcated by florid
psychotic symptoms, appears to have its origins early in life, and
many patients may manifest (in retrospect) very subtle signs of neuro-
logical-cognitive-social impairment (so called ‘pandysmaturation’).
8. SELF-ASSESSMENT
8.1. Available information on the efficacy of antipsychotic
medications suggests that:
(A) Most patients respond well to treatment, no matter which medication
is prescribed.
(B) All of the drugs have the same response in this patient group.
(C) Switching of antipsychotic medications is a common clinical
practice.
(D) All of the above.
Side effects are another major reason. Often switching medication occurs
before treatment and dosing with the previous antipsychotic has been
optimized.
Answer: C
9. CASE STUDIES
9.1. Psychotic break complicated by substance abuse
A 21-year-old woman presents for the first time to the hospital with a nine-
month history of fear that her college roommates are spying on her. She
believes that they are plotting to get her thrown out of school. She believes
that on several occasions she has overheard them say, “Let’s tell the
Provost she is a terrorist.” She is distressed and agitated when interviewed.
Her speech is unelaborated, and she barely answers questions. She appears
to be preoccupied. Occasionally, she is observed to whisper to herself. The
police who brought her to the hospital confirmed that her college room
was a mess and that it looked as if she had been not caring for herself for
months. The patient tests positive for marijuana and for the use of cocaine.
recently, he said to his brother that ‘life is a drag’. His mother reports that
he was always a shy kid and socially withdrawn. She describes that he was
more upset than his siblings at the divorce of his parents 10 years ago.
When seen in the clinic, he was unkempt in appearance. He made poor
eye contact and was clearly unhappy to be there. He did not engage in the
interview. His answers to questions were brief and unelaborated. He was
mildly disorganized in his speech. He denied being depressed or paranoid.
He said he had never heard voices or seen unusual things. His urinary drug
screen and other tests were all normal.
The clinician determined to monitor the patient over time: perhaps he
is depressed or perhaps he is experiencing some prodromal state. Time
will tell.
titrated to a therapeutic dose. The voices she was hearing receded, but she
continued to have bizarre ideas. Upon discharge from the hospital, she
could not afford ziprasidone. This medication was denied by her insurance
company in favor of oral risperidone, which was available in a less costly
form. She agreed to switch to risperidone. It worked better, but three
months later she stopped it completely because she believed it had harmed
her by obliterating her menstrual cycle (risperidone is known to cause
hyperprolactinemia). She subsequently relapsed and was committed to the
hospital against her will. Her symptoms were stabilized well on olanzap-
ine, but she gained 30 lbs within six weeks. Her cholesterol level also rose
to an almost abnormal level. Efforts to help her with dietary restriction and
with a weight loss and exercise program were ineffective. The addition of
metformin to her treatment regimen did not have much effect on her
weight and elevated cholesterol. The patient again stopped her medication.
Months went by until she was brought to the hospital by the fire brigade,
this time having set fire to her apartment in an effort to ‘shine a light for the
aliens to land their ship.’ She refused to take any medication and eventually
agreed to take a long-acting injection of monthly paliperidone palmitate,
which helped. Nine months later, her ideas are less pronounced and her
behavior is less erratic. However, she remains deluded. Her psychiatrist is
considering starting her on clozapine. The psychiatrist is concerned as to
whether she will take this medication, given her history of non-adherence
with other oral medications. He wonders whether she might be better off
to stay on the long-acting injection, even though it is only partially effec-
tive. The patient is scared about taking clozapine. She says that if she
‘blacks out’ with a seizure, she might lose contact altogether with the
aliens, who might then land and attack China. She is also very worried
about gaining weight on clozapine. As a compromise, the patient and her
doctor agree to add a small dose of quetiapine to her current regimen.
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2012) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th
Revision, Preliminary postings and review. Available at: htpp://www.DSM5.org
2. Biedermann F, Fleischhacker WW. (2009) Antipsychotics in the early stage
of development. Curr Opin Psychiatry 22: 326–330.
3. Buchanan RW, Kreyenbuhl J, Kelly DL, et al. (2010) The 2009 schizophre-
nia PORT psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary
statements. Schizophr Bull 36: 71–93.
4. Buckley PF, Foster A, Patel N, Weimert S. (2009) Nonadherence to Mental
Health Treatments. Oxford University Press.
5. Castle DJ, Buckley PF. (2008) Schizophrenia. Oxford University Press,
Oxford.
6. Craddock N, Owen MJ. (2010) Molecular genetics and the Kraepelinian
dichotomy: One disorder, two disorders, or do we need to start thinking
afresh? Psychiatr Ann 40(2): 88–91.
7. Harvey PD, Cornblatt B. (2008) Pharmacological treatment of cognition in
schizophrenia: An idea whose time has come. Am J Psychiatry 165: 163–165.
8. Institute of Medicine. (2005) Improving the Quality of Health Care for
Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Committee on
Crossing the Quality Chasm: Adaptation to Mental Health and Addictive
Disorders, National Academies Press, Rockville, MD.
9. Keshavan MS, Tandon R, Boutros NN, et al. (2008) Schizophrenia, ‘just the
facts’: What we know in 2008 — part 3. Neurobiology. Schizophr Res 106:
89–107.
10. Leucht S, Corves C, Arbter D, et al. (2009) Second-generation versus first-
generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Lancet
373: 31–41.
11. Lieberman J, Stroup S, Perkins DO. (2006) Textbook of Schizophrenia,
American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.
12. Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, et al. (2005) Effectiveness of antipsy-
chotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 353:
1209–1223.
13. McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, et al. (2006) Effectiveness of clozap-
ine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic
schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment.
Am J Psychiatry 163: 600–610.
14. McGorry PD, Tanti C, Stokes R, et al. (2007) Headspace: Australia’s
national youth mental health foundation — where young minds come first.
Med J Aust 187(7Suppl): S68–70.
15. Newcomer J. (2007) Antipsychotic medications: Metabolic and cardiovascu-
lar risk. J Clin Psychiatry 68: 813.
Chapter 9
Mood Disorders
1. INTRODUCTION
Patients with mood disorders are ubiquitous in general medical practice.
These illnesses can cause substantial suffering for patients, but with
appropriate recognition and management, patients with mood disorders
can have significant relief from their symptoms and live productive lives.
Thus all clinicians must be able to recognize symptoms of these disorders
and know how to initiate treatment. In this chapter we review the epide-
miology of these disorders, new frontiers in understanding the biological
and psychological underpinnings of mood symptoms, typical clinical
features, and evidence-based approaches to treatment.
204
age 50, and if mania happens for the first time in an older adult, causative
conditions such as medical illness, prescription drug side effects, or
substance abuse should be ruled out.
Mood disorders appear in all socioeconomic and cultural groups,
leading to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The World
Health Organization listed unipolar depressive disorder as the world’s
third most frequent cause of burden of disease in 2004, behind only lower
respiratory infections and diarrheal illnesses. Projections suggest that
by 2030 unipolar depression will move into the # 1 spot. Mood disorders
are associated with such substantial morbidity because they tend to have
onset early in life and be a chronic, if intermittent, presence throughout
the working and reproductive years, substantially impacting course of life.
Mortality is also a serious concern in mood disorders, because they are the
primary risk factor for completed suicide. In 2005, the most recent year
for which data are available, suicide was the # 2 cause of death in
15–19-year-old girls in the United States, and the # 3 cause of death for
boys in the same age group. It was also the 8th leading cause of death for
men of any age. Thus, both disability and suicide associated with mood
disorders are major public health concerns.
4. DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS
4.1. Phenomenology of depressive disorders
A depressive episode is more than just a passing mood or an acute reaction
to immediate circumstances. Depression robs patients of their vitality and
saps the psychic energy that would otherwise motivate emotional, cogni-
tive, and physical activity. Particularly with prolonged symptoms, patients
with major depression often struggle to maintain work or school function-
ing. They may significantly curtail their leisure activities or experience
strain in significant relationships. A depressive episode is also persistent:
DSM-IV-TR requires symptoms of at least two weeks’ duration in order
to diagnose a major depressive episode, and while ICD-10 does not
specify a minimum amount of time, it does note that episodes, at least in
recurrent depression, tend to last a few weeks to several months.
Prominent emotional symptoms required to diagnose a depressive
episode include a lowered mood and a reduced capacity for enjoyment of
diagnosis carries significant stigma, the disorder may take the form of a
panoply of vague somatic symptoms such as increased headaches, pain, or
gastrointestinal distress underlain by typical depressive symptoms that are
often only elicited on specific questioning. Patients who struggle to iden-
tify or directly communicate emotional distress may also present with
prominent physical symptoms. Somatic symptoms may dominate the
depressive presentations of geriatric patients, who may also display
significant memory and cognitive impairment, often referred to as “pseu-
dodementia.” Finally, women in their reproductive years can have fluctu-
ating mood symptoms coinciding with their menstrual cycles, with the
peripartum period a particularly high-risk time for developing full-blown
mood disorders.
In terms of morbidity and mortality, suicidal behavior is the most
significant concern in depressed patients. Although numbers vary, studies
suggest 2% of patients with affective disorders die by suicide, a number
that increases to more than 8% in patients ever hospitalized for suicidality.
Suicide risk factors include a past history of suicide attempts, social isola-
tion, and a family history of suicide. Potentially modifiable factors include
significant agitation and/or insomnia, substance misuse, and access to
such lethal means of suicide as firearms. All depressed patients should be
questioned about desire for death, plans for self-injury, access to means of
self-injury, and intent to act upon these plans. When a patient has active
thoughts of self-harm, the treatment plan should include interventions to
reduce suicide risk, including instructing patient and family to remove
firearms from the home, prescribing medications to reduce agitation and
insomnia, and referring the patient for chemical dependency treatment
when indicated. If these risks cannot be modified or if a patient presents
significant risk of self-harm, immediate hospitalization can help reduce
distress and lower acute suicide risk.
Both CBT and IPT have been shown to be effective at treating depres-
sive symptoms in patients and, in some studies, have been shown to be as
effective as medications. Several studies also demonstrate a protective
effect of therapy in preventing future episodes even after therapy is
discontinued, an effect not demonstrated after discontinuation of
medications.
Psychodynamic therapies, based on the psychoanalytic treatments
developed by Freud and his successors, suggest that depression results
from buried internal conflicts stemming from earlier experiences. The
goals of therapy include bringing these conflicts into conscious awareness
and gaining insight into old patterns of thinking and relating that interfere
with optimal mental health. Psychodynamic therapies have classically
involved sessions 1–4 times a week over years, but brief psychodynamic
therapies similar to CBT and IPT in duration and frequency demonstrate
good efficacy in improving depressive symptoms.
Most psychotherapies for depressive episodes incorporate psychoedu-
cation that aims to improve the patient’s understanding of depression and
its treatment; reduce stigma, guilt, and shame; and promote wellness-
enhancing behaviors such as exercise.
The most commonly used somatic treatments for depressive episodes
are the antidepressant medications. These come in several classes,
including the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs),
Serotonin–Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic anti-
depressants (TCAs), and non-reversible Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
(MAO-Is). Other antidepressant medications include mirtazapine,
bupropion, trazodone, and nefazodone. Given that all antidepressant
medications achieve similar efficacy against the core symptoms of
depression, the best antidepressant for a particular patient maximizes
salubrious side effects and minimizes noxious ones. For example, a
sedating antidepressant such as a TCA may help with sleep distur-
bances, while an activating medication like bupropion may combat low
energy and motivation.
Most antidepressant treatment algorithms, such as those suggested
in the STAR*D trial1 or in the NICE clinical guidelines, follow a simi-
lar pattern. Given the favorable risk–benefit ratio, they recommend
starting with SSRIs. They emphasize the importance of the patient
5. BIPOLAR DISORDER
5.1. Phenomenology of bipolar disorder
If depressive illness can be viewed as a deficit of psychic energy, manic
and hypomanic episodes involve an excess of such energy. As with
depressive illness, these mood changes are more than a passing reaction
to circumstances, and are typically prolonged and significantly impairing.
ICD-10 does not specify a length of time, but DSM-IV requires symptoms
to be present for at least four days to diagnose hypomania and a week to
diagnose mania.
The sense of well-being often extends to self-aggrandizement, with
manic patients developing exalted ideas about their worth and achieve-
ments, even to the extent of believing themselves to be a celebrity or deity.
This overconfidence drives a tendency to underestimate risk: manic
patients engage in reckless behaviors such as promiscuous sex, excessive
gambling, or fast driving. Excess energy manifests in increased physical
activity, extreme talkativeness, decreased or absent need for sleep, and
difficulty sustaining attention or focus. Psychotic symptoms can also
develop and can take the form of delusions, typically of a grandiose
nature, or auditory or visual hallucinations.
The euphoria of mania can prove contagious to those around the
patient, and many a treatment team has walked out of a manic patient’s
hospital room with the entire team chuckling at what has just transpired!
No matter how amusing, manic behaviors are a dramatic departure
some conditions, notably pancreatic cancer, mood change can be the first
sign of an otherwise asymptomatic process. Medications can also induce
mood changes. Prednisone and other corticosteroids, interferon alpha,
antiparkinsonian medications, and beta blockers are commonly impli-
cated, but almost any pharmacologic agent has the potential for causing
mood changes. Long-term opiate or benzodiazepine use may create the
equivalent of a depressive syndrome. Whenever a patient complains of
mood symptoms, the physician should always conduct a medical review
of systems and review all current medications, including over-the-
counter and complementary preparations. Targeted physical examination
and laboratory and imaging investigations should be performed as
indicated.
Substance abuse is almost universally associated with mood changes,
and indeed many patients use substances precisely because of their mood
effects. The colloquial terms “uppers” and “downers,” for stimulants and
sedatives respectively, invoke the desired effects of ingestion. Intoxication
with stimulating substances such as cocaine, methamphetamine, and hal-
lucinogens can at times be indistinguishable from mania, while alcohol,
narcotics, marijuana, and other sedatives can induce a depressed appear-
ance. Chronic use of many substances such as amphetamines or cannabis
can result in persistent mood changes even when a user is not acutely
intoxicated. Deciding whether mood disorders are secondary to substance
use or comorbid with substance use (“dual diagnosis”) can be challenging,
particularly because patients with mood disorders have a high rate of co-
occurring substance use. Timing of mood symptoms can be helpful in
making this distinction: if mood symptoms resolve during extended
periods of sobriety, they are much more likely to be secondary to substance
use than if they predate substance use and/or persist during extended
sobriety.
Treatment of secondary mood disorders focuses on managing or elimi-
nating the provoking condition, along with educating patient and family
about the symptoms’ presumed etiology. However, if the condition is
anticipated to become chronic, such as with cancer or stroke, treatment
recommendations for secondary mood disorders generally parallel those
for primary mood disorders.
9. KEY POINTS
• Mood disorders are common and disabling illnesses, and present at all
ages and in all cultures and socioeconomic strata.
• Mood changes are the defining symptom of mood disorders, but these
illnesses also affect physical energy, cognitive abilities, sleep and
appetite, and self-concept.
• Consider the “Eight D” differential for mood symptoms — Depressed
(unipolar or bipolar), Demoralized, Drugged, Difficult, Delirious,
Delusional, Dulled, and Disaffiliated.
• Patients presenting with mood symptoms should be screened for
suicide, including desire for death, plans for suicide, intent to act, and
access to lethal means.
• The most effective mood disorder treatments combine biological and
psychosocial approaches.
• Although mood disorders are treatable, they are characterized in
many patients by recurrent episodes and long-term vulnerability to
relapse.
• Mood symptoms in dysthymia and cyclothymia may have a lower
intensity than those of major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder,
but patients with these disorders still experience significant dysfunc-
tion in work and relationships.
10. SELF-ASSESSMENT
10.1. Mrs Jones, a 62-year-old recently-widowed woman, sees
her family physician with complaints of on-going sadness
after her husband’s death a month ago. Which of the
following symptoms is most suggestive of a depressive
episode rather than bereavement?
(A) Difficulty focusing.
(B) Feeling like a bad person.
(C) Fleeting suicidal thoughts.
(D) Problems sleeping.
(E) Frequent tearfulness.
Patients who are grieving often have difficulties with sleep and appe-
tite, problems with focusing, and can even occasionally wish to die
and join their lost loved one. Changes in self-concept, however, are
uncommon in simple bereavement and much more suggestive of
depression.
Answer: B
listening to music with the lights off. She reports that he eats very little,
and all of the trousers she purchased for him before his leaving home are
now too loose.
On examination, Mr H is mildly dishevelled. He stares at the floor
during most of the conversation, moving very little. He speaks so softly
that it is difficult to hear him at times, but his answers make sense. His
facial reactions are almost non-existent, although he does shed a couple of
tears when talking about his poor grades. He acknowledges having had
passive thoughts that it might be easier to be dead than to continue to face
all of his stresses, and says that he feels that he is so stupid he will never
be able to graduate from university, “so why bother.” However, he says
that he has no actual desire to be dead and has not thought of any plans to
try to kill himself.
makes frequent verbal puns and jokes, and on several occasions flirts with
the female resident. When asked about suicidality, he shouts, “Die? Me?
I cannot die! I will never die!”
REFERENCES
1. Gaynes BN, Warden D, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Fava M, Rush AJ.
(2009) What did STAR*D teach us? Results from a large-scale, practical,
clinical trial for patients with depression. Psychiat Serv 60: 1439–1445.
Chapter 10
Anxiety Disorders
1. INTRODUCTION
Anxiety disorders are amongst the most prevalent of the psychiatric disor-
ders. Epidemiological studies indicate that anxiety disorders are, in fact,
more prevalent than mood disorders among the general population.1
Approximately 25% of individuals will meet criteria for an anxiety disor-
der in their lifetime, with females being affected more commonly than
males (female to male lifetime prevalence ratio is 3:2). In addition, anxi-
ety disorders are associated with significant morbidity, comorbidity, and
economic costs. Part of the costs of anxiety disorders are unfortunately
still due to underdiagnosis and undertreatment.
The World Health Organization’s 10th revision of the International
Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-
10) lists the main anxiety disorders as (1) phobic anxiety disorders, which
include agoraphobia, social phobia, and specific phobia; (2) other anxiety
disorders, which include panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder;
and (3) obsessive-compulsive disorder. ICD-10 groups reactions to severe
stress (acute stress reaction and posttraumatic stress disorder) together
with adjustment disorders as stress-related disorders, but for the purpose
of this handbook, acute stress reaction and posttraumatic stress disorder
will be discussed in this chapter.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-
IV-TR) published by the American Psychiatric Association, classifies
227
This chapter will review each of the major anxiety disorders. Sections
will cover phenomenology (e.g. diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, clinical
presentation, and assessment), psychobiology, and management.
2.4. Epidemiology
Studies have revealed that lifetime prevalence for panic disorder ranges
between 1.5% and 3.5%. The female to male ratio is approximately 2–3:1.
Onset of panic disorder is usually between late adolescence and age 30,
but panic disorder has been diagnosed in childhood and early adolescence,
as well as in later life.
2.5. Pathogenesis
As with the other anxiety disorders, the exact cause of panic disorder
remains uncertain. Specific neural circuits, genetic contributions, and
psychosocial stressors have all been implicated in the development of
panic disorder.
• Cardiovascular Disease
Ischaemic heart disease
Cardiac arrhythmias
Congestive cardiac failure
Hypertension
Anaemia
• Respiratory Disease
Pulmonary embolus
Asthma
Chronic obstructive airways disease
• Metabolic Disease
Acidosis
Hyperthermia
Hypocalcaemia
• Endocrine Disease
Hyperthyroidism
Hyper- and hypoglycaemia
Hyper- and hypoparathyroidism
Cushing’s syndrome
Pheochromocytoma
Menopause
• Neurological Disease
Cerebrovascular disease
Seizures, especially complex partial seizures
Syncopal attacks
Vestibular dysfunction
Intracranial tumors
• Drug Intoxication
Cocaine
Cannabis
Amphetamines
Caffeine
Nicotine
Sympathomimetics
Theophylline
• Drug Withdrawal
Alcohol
Anxiolytics especially benzodiazepines
Opioids
and the anticipatory anxiety associated with panic disorder may be medi-
ated by the amygdala and its afferent and efferent projections. The devel-
opment of phobic avoidance may be mediated by the prefrontal cortex.
Reception of threatening information may in part lead to amygdalar
activation. Amygdalar efferents project to various brainstem and hypotha-
lamic nuclei eliciting the autonomic and behavioral responses associated
with panic; these include (1) an increased respiratory rate, (2) sympathetic
nervous system activity, (3) increased heart rate and blood pressure,
(4) release of adrenaline from the adrenal glands, and (5) defensive behav-
iors and postural freezing. The prefrontal cortex receives and evaluates
sensory information and is able to inhibit the amygdala, thereby modulat-
ing amygdalar fear reactions. The development of phobic avoidance may
involve hippocampal and prefrontal cortical activity; patients remember
the context in which panic attacks have occurred in the past; this is known
as contextual learning.
Neurotransmitters associated with the above neural circuits include
serotonin, noradrenaline, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA).
Psychotropics that target symptoms of panic attacks typically act on these
three receptors.
Panic attacks in panic disorder can also be understood in terms of
neurocircuitry triggering a false alarm. In panic disorder this may be a
false suffocation alarm; it has been postulated that everyone has a suffoca-
tion alarm, which is an evolutionary response to increased levels of carbon
dioxide. In individuals with panic disorder, this alarm is falsely triggered
at a lower threshold than normal, or more frequently than normal.
2.10. Assessment
It is of prime importance to exclude panic-like symptoms that may be due
to a general medical condition or exacerbated by a poorly controlled con-
dition or due to the effects of drug treatments or substances of abuse. Once
a medical disorder has been excluded as a cause of panic attacks, the clini-
cian should enquire about the characteristics of attacks with the aim of
clarifying the diagnosis, establishing severity, and identifying comorbid
psychiatric disorders.
Patients should be asked to list the symptoms experienced during a
panic attack. The intensity and frequency of panic attacks is also impor-
tant to note. Patients may experience several attacks a day or less than one
attack per month. The level of impairment in social, occupational (or
academic), and leisure functioning should be noted, as well as the level of
premorbid functioning in these areas.
Psychosocial stressors need to be identified. The clinician should try to
establish a link between panic attacks and preceding thoughts, activities,
and situations. Panic disorder and agoraphobia can occur in isolation but
are commonly comorbid. Clarity is needed as to whether the patient meets
criteria for one or both disorders. Patients should be screened for the pres-
ence of comorbid psychiatric disorders and suicidal ideation and intent.
2.11. Management
As with other psychiatric disorders, patients should be managed within a
biopsychosocial framework to achieve optimal results. Decisions regard-
ing management should be made in conjunction with patients after they
have been educated about their disorder and treatment options and should
be tailored to address patients’ particular difficulties and concerns, while
drawing on support from the protective factors in their lives.
Biological management comprises optimal control of comorbid
medical disorders; the initiation, monitoring, and adjustment of psycho-
tropic medication; and education of patients about panic disorder,
including available treatments and treatment side effects. Psychotropics
found to be effective in the treatment of panic disorder include antide-
pressants and anxiolytics, principally benzodiazepines. B-adrenergic
receptor antagonists are not effective in treating panic disorder.
Antidepressants used include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
(SSRIs) as first-line agents, and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhib-
itors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and monoamine oxi-
dase inhibitors (MAOIs).
3.3. Epidemiology
Social phobia is one of the most prevalent anxiety disorders. Lifetime
prevalence estimates of 12.1% have been found by the US National
Comorbidity Survey-Replication. Similar prevalence rates have been
found in a number of countries. Lifetime prevalence of specific phobias is
approximately 11%. Although community studies find that specific and
social phobias are more prevalent among women than men, a greater pro-
portion of males to females is seen in clinical settings.
Age of onset for social phobia is during adolescence. The more severe
generalized type may begin even earlier. The disorder manifests in about
80% of those affected by age 20.
Age of onset for specific phobias vary according to the subtype. Nature
forces and blood, injection, and injury type usually begin in childhood.
The situational type tends to begin in the mid-20s.
3.4. Pathogenesis
The underlying pathogenesis of social phobia is uncertain. Advances in
basic and clinical research have, however, implicated abnormalities in
specific neural circuits as contributory to its development. Neuro-imaging
studies, for example, have found increased activation of the amygdala
(involved in fear processing), the anterior cingulate cortex, and the insular
cortex in social phobia. Neurotransmitters involved in the functioning of
these structures include serotonin, noradrenaline, and dopamine.
Pharmacotherapy with SSRIs has been found to normalize functional
neuroanatomy in social phobia.
It is possible that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to
disruption of this neurocircuitry. Family and twin studies have found
social phobia to be of moderate heritability, with first-degree relatives of
those affected having increased risk of developing the disorder as com-
pared with the general population. Specific phobias have also been found
to run in families. It is possible that those affected by the blood, injection,
and injury type of specific phobia inherit a particularly sensitive vasovagal
reflex. Studies have also shown that specific phobias can be induced by
classical conditioning, with some individuals able to link their phobia to a
preceding traumatic experience. Learning may play a role in the develop-
ment of phobias, with children modeling their responses after adults in
their environment.
A typical symptom of anxiety in individuals with social phobia is
blushing. It has been hypothesized that blushing is representative of an
appeasement display, the function of which is to lessen the negative reac-
tion of others. Individuals with social phobia may misperceive the need
for social appeasement, perhaps because of overestimating threat from
others or by having an exaggerated opinion of their low status.5 Humans
also appear to be predisposed to developing certain phobias more easily
than others, for example, a phobia of spiders rather than of squirrels. This
may serve a survival function.
3.6. Management
Both pharmacotherapy and CBT are effective in the treatment of social
phobia. The decision regarding which treatment modality to use is often
dependant on patient profile and preference. All patients should be edu-
cated about their disorder and treatment options to help inform their deci-
sions. Pharmacotherapeutic agents often show quicker response times and
should be considered instead of psychotherapy in patients with severe
social phobia who are too anxious to engage in therapy. Pharmacotherapy
may also be a better option for those with comorbid depressive disorder
or patients in whom suicidality is a concern. CBT may have longer-lasting
effects than pharmacotherapy and may be the treatment of choice for
patients who are highly motivated and not open to pharmacotherapy.
A combination of pharmacotherapy and CBT is often used; however,
definitive evidence supporting the use of combination therapy over treat-
ment with a single modality is lacking. Irrespective of the treatment
modality adopted, all patients should be educated about their disorder.
With regards to pharmacotherapeutic agents in the treatment of social
phobia, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are first-line
agents and are effective, tolerable, and easily accessible. Response may
take up to 8–12 weeks. A serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor,
venlafaxine, has also been shown to be effective. Irreversible monoamine
oxidase inhibitors are especially efficacious in the treatment of general-
ized social phobia; however, their use remains limited because of the pos-
sibility of serious adverse effects (hypersensitive crisis) and the need for
strict dietary restrictions to prevent this. Social phobia does not respond to
treatment with most tricyclic antidepressants.
4. OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common and disabling disorder.
In the Epidemiological Catchment Area study, it was found to be the fourth
most prevalent psychiatric disorder, following phobias, substance-related
disorders, and major depressive disorder. Morbidity and mortality studies
conducted under the auspices of the World Health Organization have found
OCD to be among the most disabling of all medical conditions.
4.3. Epidemiology
Epidemiological studies conducted in many countries around the world
have found lifetime prevalence of OCD to be 2%–3%. In adults, the male
to female ratio is approximately 1:1. Although average age of onset of the
disorder is 20 years, some patients are able to track ritualistic behavior
back to childhood. Onset tends to occur slightly earlier in males than
females. Later onset of the disorder may be precipitated by neurohormonal
changes, in particular, pregnancy and the postpartum period in females.
4.4. Pathogenesis
Advances in basic and clinical research have led to an emphasis on the
role of cortico–striatal circuitry in OCD.
The first indication that OCD was related to basal ganglia pathology
was data from research on patients with post-influenza encephalitis who
developed symptoms of OCD. Subsequently, OCD has also been noted to
occur in other neurological disorders associated with basal ganglia dam-
age. These include Tourette’s disorder, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s
disease, and Sydenham’s chorea. Cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical (CSTC)
circuitry impacted by these disorders may be responsible for mediating a
range of processes involved in OCD (e.g. disgust, procedural control).
Neuro-imaging findings support evidence of CSTC circuit dysfunction.
MRI studies have found a decrease in volume of the caudate nucleus in
some individuals with OCD, while functional MRI studies have found
hyperactivity in the caudate nucleus, orbitofrontal cortex, and anterior
cingulate cortex (Fig. 1). It has been speculated that hyperactivity in corti-
cal areas is an attempt to dampen a basal ganglia “false alarm.”
Pharmacotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic interventions that success-
fully treat OCD result in normalization of hyperactivity in the CSTC
circuit (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1. Increased activity in the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate nucleus in individuals
with untreated OCD.4
4.6. Assessment
The severity of symptoms and extent of impairment should be ascertained
before initiating therapy. Because comorbid psychiatric disorders occur
with high frequency, all patients with OCD should be screened for comor-
bid disorders.
On physical examination, the clinician should search for medical seque-
lae of symptoms (e.g. dermatitis secondary to excessive hand washing)
as well as evidence of comorbid neurological disorders (e.g. Tourette’s
disorder, Sydenham’s chorea).
Presentation of the disorder after age 35 is unusual, and if this is the
case, the need for more rigorous investigation should be considered.
4.7. Management
Research has found that OCD is responsive to pharmacotherapy and
CBT. As with the other anxiety disorders, psychoeducation for the
patient and family is an important component in treatment. Families may
collude with patients in an attempt to ease their distress or may them-
selves require support to help them better understand the patient and the
disorder. Effective pharmacotherapeutic agents in the treatment of OCD
include the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine and the SSRIs.
Clomipramine has more adverse effects (e.g. anticholinergic, alpha adr-
energic, and antihistaminergic) than the SSRIs. SSRIs as a group are
safe to use and well tolerated. Symptoms of OCD may take 10–12 weeks
to respond to treatment, and symptom reduction is often achieved at
higher dosages than those used to treat depression and other anxiety
disorders. Dosages may be increased at 2–4 weekly intervals up to
60 mg for fluoxetine and citalopram, 60 mg for paroxetine, 300 mg for
fluvoxamine, 200 mg for sertraline, and 250 mg for clomipramine.
Following non-response to one agent, another serotonin reuptake inhibi-
tor should be tried. Augmentation with a low dose atypical antipsychotic
5.3. Epidemiology
The majority of the population is exposed to a traumatic event severe
enough to result in PTSD. However, only a relatively small proportion of
5.4. Pathogenesis
A key precipitant in the development of PTSD is exposure to a traumatic
event. Not every individual exposed to a sufficiently stressful situation
goes on to develop PTSD, indicating the importance of other risk factors.
Basic and clinical research has contributed to our understanding of the
psychobiology of PTSD.
Clinical studies implicate dysfunction in numerous molecular systems
in PTSD. These include disruption in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal
(HPA) axis, serotonin and noradrenaline systems, glutamate-GABA, and
opiate systems. There have been various attempts to link such distur-
bances with particular symptoms; for example, it has been suggested that
noradrenergic disturbances contribute to physiological arousal, while
opioid disturbances contribute to numbing symptoms.
Neuro-imaging studies have found decreased hippocampal volume in
those affected by PTSD. This may account in part for the disturbance in
memory and learning that these individuals experience. Decreased hip-
pocampal volume may be due to the neurotoxic effect of HPA axis dys-
function or may be a pre-existing risk factor for the development of PTSD.
5.6. Assessment
Assessment should include ensuring that the current environment is a
safe one; evaluating the intensity and frequency of symptoms experienced
and their impact on level of functioning; screening for comorbid major
depressive disorder, substance-related disorders, anxiety disorders, and
personality disorders and exploring suicidal ideation and intent; identify-
ing on-going social stressors and supports; and assessing the patient’s
view of his or her symptoms and of optimal intervention.
5.7. Management
Psychoeducation for patients and their families is an important tool in de-
stigmatizing the illness. Patients may be encouraged to accept that they
are experiencing a common psychobiological reaction to an extreme
stressor and should be educated about available treatment options.
A growing body of research supports the use of both pharmacotherapy
and psychotherapy as optimal treatments for PTSD.
As with other anxiety disorders, SSRIs are first-line pharmacothera-
peutic agents in the treatment of PTSD.9 Paroxetine and sertraline in par-
ticular are. FDA approved for the treatment of PTSD. SSRIs are safe and
effective agents that target all three symptom clusters of PTSD.
Tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and the
serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine have all been used
to treat PTSD with good effect and may be considered in SSRI non-
responders. A range of agents can also be used to augment SSRIs, includ-
ing antipsychotic agents and mood stabilizers. Once treatment response
has been achieved, pharmacotherapy should continue for at least one year
before considering withdrawal of the drug.
There is good evidence for the efficacy of CBT in PTSD. CBT may be
provided in an individual or group setting and incorporates
6.3. Epidemiology
As with the other anxiety disorders, GAD is highly prevalent. It is the
most common anxiety disorder in primary care practice. The lifetime
prevalence of GAD, as suggested by US and European studies, is in the
region of 5%. The female to male ratio is 2:1. Onset of the disorder may
be as early as adolescence, although it often begins somewhat later than
this. Less than 40% of those affected seek treatment for their disorder, and
when they do, it is often much later in life.
6.4. Pathogenesis
The etiological factors that give rise to GAD remain uncertain. Both
biological and psychosocial factors have been implicated in its pathogen-
esis. Research thus far has focused on dysfunction in the glutamate-
GABAergic systems, and serotonergic and noradrenergic systems. Various
psychosocial factors may also play a role.
6.6. Assessment
Assessment requires an evaluation not only of GAD symptom severity
and functional impairment but also of comorbid psychiatric and medical
disorders. The Hamilton Anxiety Disorder rating scale is widely used as a
symptom severity measure in GAD.
6.7. Management
Both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy have been found to be effective
in the short- and medium-term treatment of GAD. SSRIs are first-line
agents in the treatment of GAD. Some patients report improvement in
symptoms as early as two weeks following initiation of medication.
Treatment should be continued for at least a year, given that early discon-
tinuation often leads to relapse.
Benzodiazepines have been widely used in the treatment of GAD.
However, limiting factors include impaired memory, increased risk of
accidents, and rebound anxiety on withdrawal. A range of other agents are
available, including serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (venla-
faxine, duloxetine), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and buspirone.
The psychotherapy that is best supported by controlled trials in GAD is
CBT. CBT focuses on psychoeducation, relaxation techniques, identifying
and addressing precipitating stressors, cognitive restructuring to address
cognitive distortions, and the behavioral techniques of worry exposure
and worry behavior control.
7. KEY POINTS
• Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and disabling psychiatric
disorders.
8. SELF-ASSESSMENT
8.1. With regard to anxiety disorders, please state which
statement is true:
(A) Males are more commonly affected by anxiety disorders than
females.
(B) Mood disorders are more prevalent than anxiety disorders.
(C) Tricyclic antidepressants are first-line pharmacotherapeutic agents in
the treatment of anxiety disorders.
(D) Both pharmacotherapeutic agents and cognitive behavioral therapy
are effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders.
(E) Anxiety disorders do not have a heritable component.
Answer: D
9. CASE STUDIES
9.1. Panic attack
Mrs K, a 29-year-old married woman, was driving over a bridge one even-
ing when she had her first panic attack. Her heart began to race, and she
felt short of breath. Within minutes she was sweating profusely, nauseous,
and afraid that she was dying. About 10 mins later, the symptoms sub-
sided. Convinced that she had a heart attack, she drove to the closest
hospital for investigation. Physical examination, electrocardiogram, and
blood tests undertaken by the emergency room doctor were all within
normal range, and she diagnosed a panic attack.
during lectures made her sweat and her stomach churn, and she was cer-
tain she would say something humiliating. She stopped writing notes dur-
ing lectures because of her fear of others noticing that her hands trembled,
and she avoided conversations with acquaintances between classes.
Recently she began skipping classes altogether and, as a result, was now
failing three of her courses.
9.3. OCD
Mrs T, a 24-year-old woman, was happily married for one year before she
and her husband were delighted to find out that she was pregnant with
their first child. Three months after the birth of a healthy baby boy, she
presented to her primary care physician requesting “something to boost
energy levels.” On questioning, she disclosed difficulty coping with the
demands of taking care of her baby because of repetitive checking behav-
iors that she was unable to resist carrying out. She checked the plug points
in her home several times a day to ensure they were switched off unless
in absolute need of being used. She also continuously made sure that the
stove was switched off and that the iron, lighters, and boxes of matches
were stored away. She spent approximately two hours a day carrying out
these activities and had difficulty falling asleep at night because of the
worry that she had not checked properly. Her primary care physician dis-
covered that these behaviors were in response to intrusive and recurrent
images of her baby and house being burned down and that Mrs T
had begun experiencing these symptoms of OCD soon after the birth of
her baby.
9.4. PTSD
Mr D, a 50-year-old businessman, was locking up his store one evening
when he was approached by three masked men, one of whom held a gun
to his head and threatened to kill him if he did not comply with their
demands. After he had given them all the money he earned that day, he
was gagged, physically restrained, and assaulted. Mr D was convinced he
would be killed, but the assailants fled after assaulting and verbally
abused him for 20 min. Mr D was found by his son later that evening. Six
weeks after the traumatic event, Mr D’s son insisted that he consult their
primary care physician, because Mr D was experiencing nightmares and
flashbacks of the trauma. He also avoided speaking about the trauma,
expressed no interest in previously pleasurable activities, and felt unable
to emotionally engage with others. While at work he was hypervigilant
and had difficulty concentrating on daily tasks.
REFERENCES
1. Kessler RC, Chui WT, Demler O, Walters EE. (2005) Prevalence, severity,
and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity
Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62: 617–627.
2. Mataix-Cols D, Rauch SL, Manzo PA, Jenike MA, Baer L. (1999) Use of
factor-analyzed symptom dimensions to predict outcome with serotonin
reuptake inhibitors and placebo in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive
disorder. Am J Psychiatry 156: 1409–1416.
3. Sadock BJ, Sadock MD. (2007) Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry:
Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry, 10th ed. Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
Chapter 11
1. INTRODUCTION
Drugs have been used since the dawn of humanity, whether for religious
or recreational purposes. References to drug use date back thousands of
years;14 drug consumption for religious and recreational purposes, as well
as the negative consequences associated with excessive use, have been
mentioned in Greek history and that of other early civilizations.
Substance use disorders are mental and behavioral disorders attributed
to substances, whether prescribed or not. Excessive use of alcohol or
drugs has been referred to as addiction, addictive disorders, abuse or
dependence, or SUDs, although many cultural and social considerations
color those terms. Designations such as “alcoholic” or “cokehead” hold
no agreed-upon scientific meaning and are often regarded as pejorative.
This chapter presents general considerations about drugs and alcohol, fol-
lowed by brief descriptions of each of these drug categories and special
considerations that apply to each drug category, as well as guidelines for
treatment.
Substance use disorders carry a tremendous societal cost, stemming
from lost productivity, trauma, medical problems, and crime expenditures,
and finally, non-financial welfare costs, which refer to pain, suffering, and
lost life. Users of illicit drugs or alcohol are more likely to be involved in
260
3. NEUROBIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
IN SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS
Powerful myths and misconceptions about the nature of addiction persist.
For the longest time, according to what is termed the moral model, indi-
viduals suffering from substance use disorders were thought to be morally
flawed, lacking willpower, and these views continue to shape society’s
responses to drug abuse. Thus, most societies still consider, and treat, drug
and alcohol related problems as a moral failing rather than a health
problem. This is evident in the preponderance of punitive rather than
therapeutic or preventive actions.
Considering substance use disorders as a brain disease allows a more
objective and scientific approach to this issue. Thus, an SUD is a chronic,
relapsing disorder characterized by:20
4. NICOTINE
Nicotine is an alkaloid extracted from the Solanaceae plant genus, which
includes the tobacco plant, containing the highest concentration of
nicotine in comparison to other plants in that family. Nicotine was purified
in 1828 and initially considered as a pesticide. It can be smoked (e.g. ciga-
rettes) or used orally (by chewing tobacco leaves) or otherwise inhaled
(e.g. flavored tobacco smoked in a hookah). Cigarettes, the most com-
monly used of those methods, contain hundreds of other substances that
carry high potential for adverse medical consequences. The WHO
estimates that about 1.22 billion people are smokers worldwide. In adoles-
cents, there is little gender gap, but in adults, men are found to have a
higher prevalence than women. Smoking prevalence generally decreases
with increasing education, thus the health sequelae of smoking tend to
disproportionately affect the economically disadvantaged classes and
individuals with mental illness. Certain groups, such as individuals with
5. CAFFEINE
Caffeine is 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine, belonging to the methylxanthine class
of alkaloids. Other members of that family include theobromine (found in
chocolate) and theophylline. Caffeine is structurally similar to adenosine,
an endogenous neuromodulator. Caffeine is an antagonist of A2A and A1
receptors. Additionally, it increases dopamine release in the shell of the
nucleus accumbens (reward circuitry). Adenosine is beyond the scope of
this chapter; however, it is worth noting that it may have a role in agonist
treatment of cocaine and stimulant addictions.
Caffeine is metabolized by the liver cytochrome P450 1A2 and has a half-
life of 4–6 hrs. The rate of caffeine elimination can be increased by smoking
or concomitant use of medications such as cimetidine or fluvoxamine,
whereas oral contraceptives slow its metabolism. Caffeine metabolism is
also slower during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Caffeine
may inhibit the metabolism of clozapine and theophylline.
Caffeine is contained in beverages (e.g. coffee, tea, soft drinks, energy
drinks), foods (e.g. chocolate, coffee-flavored items), and medications (both
prescription and over-the-counter drugs, particularly weight loss products
and energy-touting compounds). Whereas coffee is the primary source of
caffeine among adults, soft drinks are the primary source of caffeine among
children and adolescents. Soft drink consumption has more than doubled
over the past 30 years and is a factor to be explored during health assessments.
6. ALCOHOL
Alcohol use disorders are the most common substance use ailment in the
world, with a lifetime prevalence of dependence in 15%–20% of men and
10% of women. The WHO estimates that 3.8% of mortality worldwide
7. CANNABIS
Cannabis, whose active psychoactive ingredient is ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC), is extracted from the plant Cannabis sativa and has been used for
more than 8,000 years. The flowers have higher drug concentration than
the stem and leaves. Cannabis is typically smoked, although it can also be
used orally or vaporized. Most commonly, cannabis, consisting of a mix-
ture of dried leaves and flowers of the Cannabis sativa plant is smoked in
“joints,” which resemble cigarettes in size and shape. Joints can be
smoked alone, dipped in formaldehyde (then referred to as fry or water),
or adulterated with PCP. “Blunts” are larger than joints, are similar to
cigars in size, and have become more common in recent years. Other
preparations extracted from the cannabis plant include hashish (literally
meaning “grass” in Arabic), a paste-like substance consisting of the plant
resin, and higher in THC concentration than the leaf/flower mixture. Hash
oil, an evaporated solution of solvent-extracted cannabis from resin, is not
to be confused with hashish.
Cannabis is considered an illicit substance in most countries. However,
per WHO statistics, it remains the most widely used drug globally, with
use ranging from around 2% of the population aged 15–64 in Asia to 15%
in the Oceania region. Around 75 million European adults have used can-
nabis at least once in their life (lifetime prevalence), with an estimate of
around 23 million European adults having used it in the last year. In the
United States, cannabis is the fourth most commonly used drug in the
United States after caffeine, alcohol, and nicotine. Use by young people is
concerning, because cannabis is considered a gateway drug. Further, can-
nabis has an addictive potential, although most users consider it as a
benign drug, a deep-rooted misconception. More attention has been given
recently to the fact that cannabis use can lead to dependence and that can-
nabis withdrawal (manifested mostly by intense craving, insomnia, irrita-
bility, decreased appetite, aggression, and anger) is problematic and may
lead to repeated relapses. Additionally, cannabis can exacerbate psychotic
symptoms and may precipitate psychosis in susceptible individuals.12
Cannabis intoxication can manifest with mild euphoria, relaxation,
perceptual alterations, time distortion, intensification of ordinary experi-
ences, laughter, and sociability but may also carry negative consequences
8. OPIOIDS
Opiates are naturally-occurring substances with potent psychoactive prop-
erties, widely used for analgesia and also in illicit fashion. Opium has
been used for more than 3,000 years, whereas morphine and codeine were
isolated in the 1940s. “Opioids” is an all-inclusive term referring to both
natural and synthetic substances in that family. The main therapeutic use
for opioids remains management of chronic and severe pain, and oral
prescription opioids used for that purposes are frequently diverted for
illicit use. That aspect of opioid use is on the rise worldwide. However,
injecting opioids remains a significant health problem that figures dispro-
portionately among treatment admission in both the United States and
Europe.2 For instance, although estimates of lifetime heroin use in the
United States hovers around 1.5%, heroin is responsible for at least 15%
of drug-related admissions. Opioid users constitute a heterogeneous popu-
lation, from offspring of disadvantaged families with extensive childhood
trauma to well-off teenagers with no psychiatric comorbidities.
The problem of prescription drug abuse is getting worldwide attention
because of its rapid expansion. Adolescents appear to be the prime source
of that increase, because prescription drugs are widely available and can
be easily diverted from family and acquaintances. There is a concern that
prescription drugs might play the role as a gateway drug once held by
cannabis. Death rates caused by unintentional overdoses of painkillers
used for recreational purposes have increased at least fourfold since 2000.
Prescription drug abuse consists mostly of opioid pain killer use but also
includes muscle relaxants and tranquillizers such as benzodiazepines.
Multiple substance use is common, exacerbating medical complications
and withdrawal symptoms. Of particular risk is, of course, withdrawal in
the context of benzodiazepine/opioid use, as well as withdrawal from
muscle relaxants such as carisoprodol, which is metabolized into
mepobromate.
Heritability estimates for opioids dependence are ∼50%–60%, but that
component seems to represent specific vulnerability rather than a general
predisposition to drug use via the impulsivity/disinhibition endopheno-
type discussed in the alcohol use disorder subsection. Roughly 23% of
individuals who try opioids become dependent on them, as compared to
∼16% for cocaine. Users who ultimately become dependent on opioids are
more likely to report euphoria rather than dysphoria or mental clouding
upon use.
Opioids act on the endogenous opioids receptor system, a complex
modulatory system with far-reaching effects in the human body. The
system is activated by endogenous peptides, which are genetically distinct
families of precursors that can be processed to different peptides.
9. STIMULANTS
Stimulants represent a broad category including cocaine, methampheta-
mine (METH), methcathinone, phentermine, methylenedioxyamphetamine
(MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and methylen-
edioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA), although the latter three are often
considered under the “club drug” category.
Amphetamine (phenylisopropylamine) was first synthesized in
Germany in 1887, and methamphetamine was manufactured in Japan in
1918. The early twentieth century saw multiple clinical uses for
9.1. Cocaine
Cocaine, also a potent stimulant, is the product of the leaves of the plant
Erythroxylon coca, indigenous to the high mountain ranges of South
America. Cocaine can be smoked, chewed, or injected. Coca leaves have
been chewed for at least 15 centuries in countries such as Peru. The tradi-
tional practice of chewing coca leaves is associated with addictive issues
less frequently than other modes of administration. This is thought to be
due to the lower bioavailability of oral cocaine. Use of smoked or intrave-
nous forms of cocaine is associated with faster progression to the more
serious cocaine-related problems characteristic of cocaine dependence.
Crack cocaine is inexpensive, ready-to-smoke cocaine alkaloid, which
leads to a powerful “high” because of its rapid onset of action. As with
amphetamines, cocaine was also touted as an effective treatment for
multiple diseases until its addictive potential was emphasized.
Stimulants can be smoked or injected to achieve peak plasma concen-
trations more quickly than oral ingestion. They are popular because of
their subjective effects, including euphoria; an enhanced sense of
9.2. Inhalants
As the name indicates, inhalants are volatile solvents inhaled through the
nose or mouth with the purpose of intoxication. The process can be
referred to as sniffing, huffing, glading, dusting, bagging, or other names.
Peak age of use is 14–15 years of age, although use has been reported in
children as young as five years old. Inhalants are readily-available con-
sumer products, such as whipped cream cans, deodorants, keyboard clean-
ers, or “poppers” (amyl nitrites) diverted from medical practices. They are
broadly classified into three categories: (1) Volatile alkyl nitrites;
(2) Volatile solvents, fuels; and (3) nitrous oxide. Inhalant use has a high
comorbidity with mood, anxiety, and personality disorders and is associ-
ated with impoverished living conditions, rurality and isolation, delin-
quency, criminal behavior, incarceration, family disorganization, conflict,
a history of abuse and violence, and other drug use, including intravenous
drug use.10
The high provided by inhalants consists of a sense of euphoria and
inebriation, with minimal hangover symptoms. Because inhalants are
readily absorbed by the lungs, their effects are immediate and brief. Rush,
light-headedness, and disinhibition are reported but with a risk of diplo-
pia, ataxia, dizziness, disorientation, slurred speech, and visual hallucina-
tions. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and wheezing are
among the adverse effects related to inhalant use. “Sudden sniffing death
syndrome” is the leading cause of inhalant-related mortality (∼56%), but
other medical complications (e.g. arrhythmias, suffocation, aspiration,
renal toxicity, and trauma) can also occur. Most feared is long-term,
persisting neurological damage (“toluene dementia”) and brainstem dys-
function, neuropathy, that occur with sustained use, because most inhal-
ants are lipophilic and will be stored in myelin, gradually releasing over
time and exerting toxic effects. Inhalation of nitrites cause vasodilation
and floating, increased tactile sensations, thus leading to enhanced sexual
feelings, penile engorgement, and anal sphincter relaxation, albeit with a
risk of hypotension and syncope. The demographics of nitrite use differ
somewhat from the other two classes of inhalants. Methhemoglobinemia
is a possible adverse effect of nitrite use and can lead to cyanosis and
lethargy.
Mucous membrane irritation, “huffer’s rash,” can be noted sometimes
on physical examination. As with other drug use, inhalant use can lead to
exacerbation of existing psychological, family, and school problems.
Standard psychosocial treatments for substance use disorders are useful
for treatment, although no specific treatment modality has been identified
10. HALLUCINOGENS
Hallucinogens are agents that cause alterations in perception, cognition,
and mood in the presence of a clear sensorium. They are traditionally
divided into three groups: indolealkylamines (psilocybin, DMT), ergo-
lines (LSD), and phenethylamines (ecstasy, mescaline). They all act via
serotonin system activation. Contrary to common belief that hallucino-
gens are non-addictive, physiological tolerance develops easily.13
Acute effects of hallucinogen use include psychological symptoms,
such as visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, and tactile, and somatic illu-
sions, hallucinations, and synesthesias (combinations of two sensory
modalities). In general, hallucinogens intensify the mood and exaggerate
the emotional state existing at the time of drug ingestion, unlike other
drugs, such as stimulants or alcohol, whose effects are more predictable.
The possibility of negative “trips” could explain the lack of popularity of
hallucinogens as compared to other substances. Adverse physical effects
include nausea, vomiting, autonomic activation, dilated pupils, hyperther-
mia, incoordination, and possible liver enzyme elevation.
Acute hallucinogen intoxication can be a highly aversive experience
with paranoia, confusion, and some dissociative symptoms (e.g. deperson-
alization, derealization) that last a few days following ingestion. It is
noteworthy that hallucinogens (e.g. LSD) can induce persistent psychosis
(0.8%–4% prevalence) that resembles schizophrenia and has been
reported to last up to a month following use.
“deliriants”; however, most club drugs are usually substances with mixed
pharmacological profiles, as in the case of ecstasy, which has both
stimulant and hallucinogen properties, or phencyclidine (PCP). Club drugs
represent a constantly changing field, and it is thought that successful club
drugs may become mainstream.18 Ecstasy, an amphetamine derivative with
both stimulant and hallucinogenic properties, is a classical club drug
example. Ecstasy use can cause severe acute adverse effects such as hyper-
thermia, hyponatremia, bruxism, rhabdomyolysis, and seizures, but those
risks are not widely recognized. Long-term use could exacerbate depres-
sive and anxiety symptoms insusceptible individuals. Additionally, there is
a possibility of ecstasy-induced neurotoxicity to serotonin neurons that has
been proven in animal studies and now is being studied in human users.
Club drugs include dissociative anesthetics such as ketamine, which is
typically diverted from veterinary clinics, and gamma hydroxybutyrate
(GHB), a naturally occurring, short-chain fatty acid in the CNS with high
addictive potential. GHB, as well as flunitrazepam, have been used as
“date rape” drugs.
Risks of club drugs include the fact that they are poorly characterized
and often used in a pattern of polysubstance consumption, which is par-
ticularly concerning because toxic effects can be exacerbated by certain
mixtures. A typical example would be the possibility of neurotoxicity fol-
lowing ecstasy use, which can be amplified by amphetamines, alcohol, or
cannabis.5 Another concern is the popular perception that club drugs are
not addictive, whereas in fact evidence exists concerning the potential of
developing dependence with GHB, ecstasy, and others.
15.2. An overdose
A 24-year-old female with no formal past psychiatric history is admitted
to an inpatient psychiatric unit after an overdose on several over-the-
counter medications (vitamins and other supplements). The overdose
occurred one day after the death of her mother. A few hours after admis-
sion to the psychiatric unit, she appeared increasingly anxious, respond-
ing to internal stimuli, and reporting vivid visual hallucinations. About
20 hrs into her hospital course, she was delirious, with waxing and wan-
ing awareness. She was not oriented to person, place, or time and was
not able to hold a coherent conversation. The patient was transferred to
the medical wing, where she received intravenous hydration. She was
found to have a potassium of 2.8, with other electrolytes being within
normal limits. She had tachycardia (110 beats per minute) but normal
temperature and blood pressure. She was combative and needed to be
physically restrained. Emergency medications were also administered.
Within 5 hrs, the patient had received three doses of haloperidol (total
10 mg) and lorazepam (total 4 mg). She remained delirious and was
writhing in bed. Another dose of lorazepam (6 mg) was given, after
which the patient improved noticeably, becoming oriented to person and
place (but not to date or time), and was able to say that she took 10
tablets of alprazolam “to forget about it all.” She further reported that for
the past two months, she had used alprazolam frequently, in doses up
to 16 mg per day. She was diagnosed with benzodiazepine withdrawal/
delirium tremens.
REFERENCES
1. Amato L, Davoli, et al. (2011) Cochrane systematic reviews in the field
of addiction: What’s there and what should be. Drug Alcohol Depend
113(2–3): 96–103.
2. Calabria B, Degenhardt L, et al. (2010) Systematic review of prospective
studies investigating “remission” from amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine or
opioid dependence. Addict Behav 35(8): 741–749.
3. Ciccarone D. (2011) Stimulant abuse: Pharmacology, cocaine, methamphet-
amine, treatment, attempts at pharmacotherapy. Primary Care 38(1): 41–58,
v–vi.
4. Degenhardt L, Hall W. (2012) Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and
their contribution to the global burden of disease. Lancet 379(9810): 55–70.
5. Gable RS. (2004) Acute toxic effects of club drugs. J Psychoactive Drugs
36(3): 303–313.
6. Herin DV, Rush CR, et al. (2010) Agonist-like pharmacotherapy for stimu-
lant dependence: Preclinical, human laboratory, and clinical studies. Ann N Y
Acad Sci 1187: 76–100.
7. Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. (2005) The neural basis of addiction: A pathology
of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiatry 162(8): 1403–1413.
8. Kalivas PW, Volkow ND, et al. (2005) Unmanageable motivation in addic-
tion: A pathology in prefrontal-accumbens glutamate transmission. Neuron
45(5): 647–650.
9. Karila L, Reynaud M. (2011) GHB and synthetic cathinones: Clinical effects
and potential consequences. Drug Test Anal 3(9): 552–559.
10. Lubman DI, Yucel M, et al. (2008) Inhalant abuse among adolescents:
Neurobiological considerations. Br J Pharmacol 154(2): 316–326.
11. Minozzi S, Amato L, et al. (2010) Anticonvulsants for alcohol withdrawal.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): CD005064.
12. Minozzi S, Davoli M, et al. (2010) An overview of systematic reviews on
cannabis and psychosis: Discussing apparently conflicting results. Drug
Alcohol Rev 29(3): 304–317.
Chapter 12
Cognitive Disorders
1. INTRODUCTION
Cognitive domains include memory, problem solving, judgment, lan-
guage, orientation, and performance of actions (praxis). Cognitive disor-
ders, which include dementia and delirium, are defined by dysfunction in
one or more of these domains. In the ICD-10, dementia and delirium are
categorized as organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders. They
result from etiologies that lead to cerebral dysfunction, such as brain
injury or cerebral disease. This terminology can occasionally be confus-
ing, however, because multiple etiologies exist for both delirium and
dementia. In this chapter, we first describe delirium and then the dementia
syndromes. Although the chapter is organized on the basis of the diagnos-
tic classification of ICD-10, we describe clinical entities that are well
recognized in the literature but not currently included in either the ICD-10
or the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
(DSM-IV-TR).
2. DELIRIUM
In ICD-10 delirium is described as an etiologically non-specific syndrome
characterized by disturbances of consciousness and attention, perception,
thinking, memory, psychomotor behavior, emotion, and the sleep–wake
291
cycle. It is considered possible at any age but is most common after the
age of 60 years. The ICD-10 also describes delirium as transient and of
fluctuating intensity, with recovery frequently observed within four weeks
or less. Yet, delirium is known to persist for longer periods in some cases
of chronic medical conditions, such as chronic liver disease, carcinoma,
or sub-acute bacterial endocarditis. The ICD-10 further notes that delir-
ium may not be diagnosed if the clinical symptoms are a direct result of
abuse of psychoactive substances. Delirium can, however, be superim-
posed on dementia and several other general medical conditions.
2.1. Epidemiology
The point prevalence of delirium in the general population is 0.4% for
people aged 18 years and older, whereas it is 1.1% for people aged
55 years and older. The rates of delirium are much higher for medically ill
individuals. Delirium is seen in approximately 10%–30% of hospitalized
medically ill patients. Higher rates are seen in intensive care unit patients,
patients recovering from surgical repair of hip fractures, and especially in
postcardiotomy patients. In one study conducted in a sample of termi-
nally-ill persons receiving palliative care, delirium was found in 80% of
the sample, suggesting the possibility of a subtype of delirium called
“terminal delirium.”5
Delirium is a common disorder, and the rates of delirium increase
with age. Delirium is found in 14%–56% of hospitalized older adults,
30% of older adults presenting to the emergency department, and up to
80% of older adults in intensive care units. Delirium is present in over
50% of older adults in skilled nursing facilities or post-acute care
settings.
2.2. Etiology
The major causes of delirium are systemic disease, central nervous system
disease, intoxication or withdrawal from substances, and medication side
effects and/or interactions. The exact underlying mechanism of delirium
is not well elucidated but is thought to be multi-factorial. Pathogenic
mechanisms include inflammation, chronic stress, and neurotransmission
2.3. Phenomenology
Core features of delirium include acute or sub-acute onset, alteration in
consciousness and attention, and fluctuating course. Perceptual distur-
bances, disorganization of thought processes, sleep–wake cycle disrup-
tion, emotional lability, and psychomotor abnormalities are frequently
observed clinical features of delirium. Mood alterations range from subtle
irritability to severe anxiety, depression, or even euphoria. Psychotic
symptoms can also occur and include delusions, visual hallucinations
(e.g. lilliputian, in which people, animals, or things seem smaller than
they would in real life), and visual illusions. Restlessness and fearfulness
can occur as prodromal symptoms to a delirium.8 Diffuse slowing of back-
ground activity is typically seen on the electroencephalogram in
delirium.
Delirium can be categorized as hyperactive, hypoactive, or mixed. In the
hyperactive form, agitation, perceptual disturbances, and hyper-vigilance
are common. In contrast, lethargy and psychomotor retardation predomi-
nate in the hypoactive sub-type. Hypoactive delirium is more common in
older adults, often unrecognized or misdiagnosed, and associated with a
worse prognosis than the hyperactive form. In the mixed subtype, patients
fluctuate between the hyperactive and hypoactive presentations of
delirium.
It is relatively important to differentiate a delirium from a dementia.
Dementias tend to have a gradual onset, extended duration, non-fluctuating
course (except in Lewy Body Dementia), and comparatively intact atten-
tion. In contrast, the onset of a delirium is usually sudden, the duration
often (but not always) brief, the course fluctuating, and the attention
impaired. Although delirium was traditionally thought to be brief in
nature, newer studies demonstrate that symptoms of delirium may persist
for months to years.
2.4. Treatments
The primary goal of treating a delirium is to treat the underlying contribut-
ing etiology/etiologies.1 This involves discontinuing offending medica-
tions, addressing underlying infections, and reversing any metabolic
abnormalities. Psychiatrists often are involved in managing the neuropsy-
chiatric symptoms of the delirium while the underlying causes are being
addressed. Non-pharmacologic approaches to managing a delirium should
be initiated before pharmacologic intervention. These include limiting the
number of different people caring for an individual, encouraging family
members to visit, reorientation, minimizing use of physical restraints, and
correcting sensory deficits. Ensuring adequate exposure to daylight during
the day and a quiet, dark environment at night in addition to ensuring that
a clock, calendar, and familiar decorations are visible to the patient can
also help with the management of a delirium.1
Agitation, psychosis, and insomnia often require pharmacologic inter-
ventions. When pharmacologic agents are used, they should be used at the
lowest doses and for the shortest period of time required. Ironically, the
drugs used to help manage a delirium may actually contribute to it by
worsening confusion. Neuroleptics are the first-line of medication ther-
apy, despite their numerous potential side effects, including extrapyrami-
dal symptoms (especially tardive dyskinesia with typical antipsychotics),
weight gain, metabolic symptoms, orthostatic hypotension, and an
increased risk for cerebrovascular events and mortality in individuals with
dementia. Of the neuroleptics, haloperidol has the most data supporting its
use for addressing the agitation associated with delirium. Benzodiazepines
are the treatment of choice for managing alcohol withdrawal but should
be avoided when possible in the management of other forms of delirium
in light of their sedative and confusion-inducing effects. When benzodiaz-
epines are used to address the insomnia associated with delirium, short- or
intermediate-acting ones (e.g. lorazepam) should be chosen.1
3. DEMENTIAS
According to ICD-10, dementia is a progressive syndrome secondary to
disease of the brain in which there is a disturbance of multiple higher corti-
cal functions (i.e. memory, thinking, orientation, comprehension, lan-
guage, judgment, calculation). Consciousness remains unaffected.
Problems with social interactions, emotional control, and motivation often
accompany the cognitive impairments in dementia. According to ICD-10,
there are three broad categories of dementias — Alzheimer’s disease,
Vascular dementia (including multi-infarct dementia), and Other demen-
tias. The term ‘Other dementias’ refers to symptoms of dementia seen in
conjunction with other specific neuropsychiatric conditions. The ICD-10
specifically recognizes dementia in Pick’s disease, dementia in Creutzfeldt–
Jakob disease, dementia in Huntington’s disease, dementia in Parkinson’s
disease (PD), and dementia in HIV disease. In the past decade, much
attention has been given in the scientific literature to the continuum from
normal aging to dementia, in terms of loss of cognitive function. While not
recognized as distinct entities by either ICD-10 or DSM-IV-TR, there is a
large body of literature addressing Age-Associated Memory Impairment
(AAMI) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Here we briefly summa-
rize AAMI and MCI and then we will discuss in more detail Alzheimer’s
disease, vascular dementia, and the other forms of dementia.2,13
4.2. Etiology
Neurofibrillary tangles and beta-amyloid plaques are evident on the histo-
pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurofibrillary tangles are intracellular
aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau proteins. Normally, tau proteins
help stabilize microtubules. However, in their hyperphosphorylated state
(pTau), microtubule stability and assembly is disrupted, with the resultant
formation of neurofibrillary tangles. Beta-amyloid plaques are extracellular
deposits of a 42-amino acid peptide called Abeta42 or beta-amyloid.
Neurofibrillary tangles are seen in several conditions (e.g. Pick’s disease,
progressive supranuclear palsy, dementia pugilistica) and are thus non-
specific. Also, beta-amyloid plaques predate the development of tangles
and dementia. Yet, tangle density correlates better than does amyloid plaque
density with the severity of dementia. A loss of neurons in the cholinergic,
serotonergic, and dopaminergic systems is also present. Synapse loss cor-
relates even better than do plaques or tangles with disease progression.
Although most persons with Alzheimer’s disease do not have a known
genetic determinant, genetic determinants do exist. The ApoE4 allele on
4.3. Phenomenology
The diagnosis of dementia remains clinical. Several screening tests are
commonly used. The Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) is one of the
most commonly used tests. However, it has several limitations. It does not
assess for executive functioning or praxis. Also, it has a poor sensitivity
and specificity, especially for highly educated or intelligent patients.
Adding a clock-draw and a test of praxis (e.g. “show me how you would
use a comb”) can improve its use. The Rowland Universal Dementia
Assessment Scale (RUDAS) has less cultural and educational biases than
does the MMSE. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Global
Cognitive Disorders
Table 1. Other behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Symptom Clinical presentation Etiology Management and prognosis
Agitation/ Refers to vocal or physical behaviors Heterogeneous groups of Behavioral/Psychological: Monitoring level of
Aggressiveness14 whose origins are not understood behavior that do not stimulation, identifying and eliminating
B1405
and which are not explained by represent a single triggers for agitation.
patients’ needs. The range of syndrome, so likely to Pharmacology: Atypical antipsychotics are used.
have multiple
(Continued)
301
1/31/2013 2:33:47 PM
B1405_Ch-12.indd 302
302
Table 1. (Continued)
Symptom Clinical presentation Etiology Management and prognosis
Apathy/ Social withdrawal may be the Possibly associated with Psychosocial: Educating caregivers is a major
Withdrawal earliest sign of dementia. As such, degenerative or component of managing apathy. May be
the term ‘apathy’ indicates loss of disruptive processes in beneficial to involve patients in activities —
B1405
motivation, feeling, interest, and the frontotemporal initially as spectators and gradually as
emotion. The motor component is lobes. Seen in most participants.
4.5. Treatments
The main pharmacological interventions for the cognitive symptoms of
dementia are cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galan-
tamine) and NMDA antagonists (memantine). International debate exists
over the effectiveness of these treatment modalities and when and if these
treatments should be initiated and discontinued. Clinical trials have shown
modest benefit of cholinesterase inhibitors in 30%–40% of patients with
mild to moderate dementia. The American Psychiatric Association (APA)
2007 Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Alzheimer’s
disease and Other Dementias recommends that clinicians offer their
patients with mild to moderate dementia a trial on a cholinesterase inhibi-
tor, but only after the risks and benefits are thoroughly discussed. Vitamin
E is no longer recommended for the treatment of the cognitive symptoms
of dementia due to its limited efficacy and safety concerns. Similarly,
5. VASCULAR DEMENTIA
Vascular dementia is the world’s second most common type of dementia,
although it is the most common type of dementia in certain Asian coun-
tries, such as Japan. In its pure form, it accounts for 5%–20% of demen-
tias. In its mixed form, it accounts for another 5%–20% of dementias. The
regional variations in incidence of vascular dementia found in the world
probably reflect differences in risks for cardiovascular and cerebrovascu-
lar disease, which, in turn, may reflect dietary and lifestyle differences
across cultures.
Vascular dementia is best understood as a heterogeneous group of
dementias resulting from infarction of the brain. The infarcts are typically
small but cumulative in effect.
Classically, vascular dementia has a step-wise progression, in which a
temporal relationship can be found between cognitive changes and wors-
ening brain vascular disease. These step-wise cognitive declines may cor-
relate with the development of focal neurological signs.
Vascular dementia can be further categorized as vascular dementia of
acute onset, multi-infarct dementia, and subcortical vascular dementia.
Vascular dementia of acute onset typically develops shortly after a suc-
cession of strokes from thromboses, emboli, or hemorrhage. Rarely, it
may result from a single large infarction. In contrast, multi-infarct
dementia is gradual in onset and results from an accumulation of infarcts
308
Table 2. Alzheimer’s disease international Kyoto declaration recommendations (Adapted from Prince et al.12)
Recommendation Nations with low resources Nations with medium resources Nations with high resources
Treatment in primary care Include dementia recognition Create training materials that are Improve efficiency of dementia
and treatment in training relevant locally. management.
curricula of health personnel. Refresher training for PCPs. Establish referral systems.
Refresher training to primary
B1405
care physicians (PCPs).
Make treatments available Increase availability of Ensure availability of Create access to newer
medications. medications. medications.
(Continued)
1/31/2013 2:33:47 PM
B1405_Ch-12.indd 309
Cognitive Disorders
Table 2. (Continued )
Recommendation Nations with low resources Nations with medium resources Nations with high resources
National policy, programs, Update national policy on the Dementia care policies at national Ensure fair access to primary,
and legislation basis of the latest international and subnational levels. secondary, and tertiary care
recommendation and human Appropriate budgets for mental and social welfare programs
rights laws. health care. and benefits.
Dementia care programs to
B1405
include persons with dementia
in entitlement plans.
309
impact of dementia. preventive measures.
1/31/2013 2:33:47 PM
B1405 International Handbook of Psychiatry
8. CONCLUSION
Cognitive disorders, including delirium and dementia, are common in
late life. With the exponential aging of the world population, the number
of older adults experiencing cognitive disorders will likewise expand.
As outlined in this chapter, dementia and delirium are associated with
numerous neuropsychiatric symptoms and incur enormous costs to soci-
ety, affected individuals, and their caregivers. Furthermore, delirium is
associated with a poor prognosis, including increased mortality. It is
thus imperative that we monitor for and treat these important conditions.
Future research into the recognition and treatment of cognitive disor-
ders, especially in developing countries, is warranted.15
9. KEY POINTS
• Delirium is often under-recognized, under-diagnosed, and
under-treated.
• Delirium carries a poor prognosis.
• The best treatment for delirium is the treatment of its underlying
etiology(ies).
• Urinary tract infections are a common infectious etiology of delirium
in older adults.
• When evaluating for underlying etiologies of a delirium, always con-
sider medications (side effects, anticholinergic properties, and medi-
cation interactions).
• Dementia is a common neurocognitive disorder with large social,
economic, and medical implications.
• The rate of dementia will increase substantially as the world popula-
tion ages.
• Alzheimer’s disease is the most common dementia, although cultural
differences exist in dementia prevalence rates.
• Neuropsychiatric symptoms commonly occur with dementias.
• Caregiver burnout is common and should be carefully monitored and
treated.
10. SELF-ASSESSMENT
10.1. Which of the following features best help distinguish
a delirium from a dementia?
(A) Memory changes.
(B) Agitation.
(C) Visual hallucinations.
(D) Acute onset.
Individuals with Lewy Body Dementia are sensitive to the side effects of
neuroleptics, especially to the extrapyramidal side effects.
Answer: B
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2006) American Psychiatric Association
Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders, Compendium
2006, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
2. Blazer D, Steffens D. (2009) American Psychiatric Press Textbook of Geriatric
Psychiatry, 4th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA
3. Chen JH, Lin KP, Chen YC. (2009) Risk factors for dementia. J Formos Med
Assoc 108: 754–764.
4. Chertkow H, Massoud F, Nasreddine Z, et al. (2008) Diagnosis and treat-
ment of dementia: 3. Mild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment
without dementia. CMAJ 178: 1273–1285.
5. Fainsinger RL, De Moissac D, Mancini I, Oneschuk D. (2000) Sedation for
delirium and other symptoms in terminally ill patients in Edmonton. J Palliat
Care 16: 5–10.
6. Jeste DV, Blacker D, Blazer D, et al. (2010) Proposal from the Neurocognitive
Disorders Work Group. Available at: http://www.dsm5.org/Proposed%20
Revision%20Attachments/APA%20Neurocognitive%20Disorders%20
Proposal%20for%20DSM-5.pdf
7. Jeste DV, Finkel SI. (2000) Psychosis of Alzheimer’s disease and related
dementias: Diagnostic criteria for a distinct syndrome. Am J Geriatr
Psychiatry 8: 29–34.
8. Meagher DJ, Maclullich AM, Laurila JV. (2008) Defining delirium for the
international classification of diseases, 11th Revision. J Psychosom Res 65:
207–214.
9. Meeks TW, Ropacki SA, Jeste DV. (2006) The neurobiology of neuropsychi-
atric syndromes in dementia. Curr Opin Psychiatry 19: 581–586.
10. McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, et al. (2005) Consortium on DLB.
Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Third report of
the DLB consortium. Neurology 65:1863–1872.
11. Olin JT, Schneider LS, Katz IR, et al. (2003) Provisional diagnostic criteria
for depression of Alzheimer disease: Description and review. Expert Rev
Neurother 3: 99–106.
12. Prince M, Acosta D, Albanese E, et al. (2008) Ageing and dementia in low
and middle income countries — using research to engage with public and
policy makers. Int Rev Psychiatry 20: 332–343.
13. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P. (2009) In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds.),
Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 9th ed. Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
14. Salzman C, Jeste DV, Meyer RE, et al. (2008) Elderly patients with demen-
tia-related symptoms of severe agitation and aggression: Consensus statement
on treatment options, clinical trials methodology, and policy. J Clin
Psychiatry 69(6): 889–898.
15. Vahia IV, Cain A, Depp CA. (2010) Cognitive interventions: Traditional and
novel approaches. In: Depp CA, Jeste DV (eds.), Handbook of Successful
Cognitive and Emotional Aging, pp. 325–349, American Psychiatric
Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
16. Yesavage JA, Friedman L, Ancoli-Israel S, et al. (2003) Development of
diagnostic criteria for defining sleep disturbance in Alzheimer’s disease.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 16: 131–139.
Chapter 13
Somatoform Disorders
Christina L. Wichman
1. INTRODUCTION
There are several types of somatoform disorders, as classified in the ICD-
10, which will be discussed here, including somatization disorder, undif-
ferentiated somatoform disorder, hypochondriacal disorder, dissociative
(conversion) disorder, and persistent somatoform pain disorder. We will
also review factitious disorder and malingering, although they are not
classified as somatoform disorders.
There are several shared generalizations of the class of somatoform
disorders. These patients have the presence of physical symptoms that
suggest a general medical condition but are not explained by a medical
condition. Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are
physical symptoms that prompt the sufferer to seek health care but remain
unexplained even after an appropriate medical evaluation.20 Some authors
have suggested that the precise diagnosis of MUPS depends more on the
diagnosing physician’s specialty than on any actual difference between
the syndromes.20 MUPS are typically classified by either psychiatric
syndromes or hypothetical syndromes on the basis of the diagnostic
criteria.
Several consequences may occur when a patient is diagnosed with
MUPS. First and foremost, there typically is an impaired physician–
patient relationship. Studies have demonstrated physician frustration
317
318 C. L. Wichman
in this patient population, with one in six primary care visits considered
difficult. Furthermore, there seems to be a “dose–response” relationship
between the number of symptoms and level of physician frustration. For
example, among patients presented with 0–1 symptoms, only 6% of
patient interactions were labeled as “difficult” by providers, but these
increased dramatically to 36% when patients presented with 10 or more
symptoms.8 As expected, patients with MUPS have higher levels of dis-
satisfaction with their health care providers and demonstrate increased
psychosocial distress, decreased quality of life, and increased rates of
depression and anxiety. Patients suffering with somatoform disorders
often demonstrate alexithymia, the inability to articulate their internal
feeling states in words. They may therefore express their feelings through
somatic (or physical) complaints. Alexithymia correlates positively with
depression, somatization, and hypochodriasis.22 Patients with MUPS also
have increased rates of health care utilization. Unfortunately, higher rates
of utilization often lead to more harm and patient dissatisfaction than to
medical benefits. Studies have demonstrated that this patient population
has to up nine times higher medical costs.
Patients with somatoform disorders are often convinced that their
suffering comes from an undetected and untreated physical disease state.
Their bodies are demonstrating their psychosocial stress as physical stress
and patients often misinterpret normal physiological functions as prob-
lematic. For the class of somatoform disorders, these symptoms are not
consciously produced or feigned.
The ICD-10 category of somatoform disorders (Table 1) differs from
the DSM-IV class1 in that it requires “persistent requests for medical
investigations” and resistance to consideration of “psychological causa-
tion” despite “repeated negative findings and reassurance by doctors that
the symptoms have no physical basis.” As described later in this chapter,
DSM-IV only requires these elements in hypochondriasis and body
dysmorphic disorder. Additionally, the ICD-10 grouping encompasses
different disorders: somatization disorder, undifferentiated somatoform
disorder, hypochondrical disorder (of which body dysmorphic disorder is
a subset), somatoform autonomic disorder (a disorder not included in
DSM-IV), persistent somatoform pain disorder, other somatoform disor-
ders, and somatoform disorders unspecified. Conversion disorder is not
• History of at least two years’ complaints of multiple and variable physical symptoms
that cannot be explained by any detectable physical disorders.
• Preoccupation with the symptoms causes persistent distress and leads the patient to
seek repeated (three or more) consultation or sets of investigation with either primary
care specialist doctors. In the absence of medical services within either the financial or
physical reach of the patient, there must be persistent self-medication of multiple
consultations with local healers.
• Persistent refusal to accept medical reassurance that there is no adequate physical
cause for the physical symptoms.
• There must be a total of six or more symptoms from the following list, with symptoms
occurring in at least two separate groups:
{ Gastrointestinal Symptoms
• Abdominal pain
• Nausea
• Feeling bloated or full of gas
• Bad taste in mouth or excessively coated tongue
• Complaints of vomiting or regurgitation of food
• Complaints of frequent and loose bowel movement or discharge of fluids
from anus
{ Cardiovascular Symptoms
• Breathlessness without exertion
• Chest pains
{ Genitourinary Symptoms
• Dysuria or complaints of frequency or micturition
• Unpleasant sensation in or around the genitals
• Complaints of unusual or copious vaginal discharge
{ Skin and pain symptoms
• Blotchiness or discoloration of the skin
• Pain in the limbs, extremities or joints
• Unpleasant numbness or tingling sensations
• Most commonly used exclusion cause: Symptoms do not occur only during any of the
schizophrenic or related disorders (F20–F29), any of the mood (affective) disorders
(F30–F39), or panic disorder (F41.0).
320 C. L. Wichman
2. SOMATIZATION DISORDER
Somatization disorder is the prototype somatoform disorder. It is charac-
terized by symptoms in multiple physical domains that continue for many
years, often leading to impairment of functioning. Medical investigation
does not reveal an underlying cause to these symptoms. In order to diag-
nose somatization disorder, multiple, recurrent, and frequently changing
physical symptoms of at least two years’ duration must be present.
A detailed history, as well as review of medical and psychiatric records, is
often warranted to uncover a somatization disorder. Patients are not inten-
tionally producing or lying about their symptoms, as in factitious or
malingering disorders.
Patients typically present for medical care before the age of 30 years.
Many patients will describe themselves as sickly most of their lives.
Common presenting symptoms vary but may include back pain, head-
aches, abdominal pain, pelvic pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, fainting,
seizures, weakness, paralysis, or painful sexual intercourse. Histories are
often vague, circumstantial, and inconsistent, but patients take the time to
relate their distress, often in a dramatic, emotional, and exaggerated
fashion. Oftentimes, patients will have had a large number of outpatient
visits, frequent hospitalization, and repetitive subspecialty referrals, as
well as multiple unnecessary tests and procedures that are usually unre-
vealing. Patients are often frustrated and disappointed with their care
providers when further medical tests are deemed inappropriate. Patients
may experience iatrogenic disease or injury secondary to diagnostic inves-
tigations, polypharmacy, or multiple surgeries. These patients tend to be
at a higher risk for abuse or dependence on drugs designed for symptom
control (i.e. pain medications, sedatives).
Somatization disorder is found predominately in women, with a
female to male ratio of approximately 10:1 in the United States popula-
tion. However, this ratio is not as high as in some other cultures, for
example, in Greeks and Puerto Ricans. Therefore, gender and culture
specific rates are more meaningful than generalized figures. The lifetime
risk of somatization disorders has been estimated to be 2% in US
women, 0.5% in US men,3 however slightly lower at 0.5%–1% in the
United Kingdom.2
322 C. L. Wichman
3. HYPOCHONDRIACAL DISORDER
Hypochondriacal disorder is the preoccupation with fear of having a
serious illness that does not respond to reassurance after appropriate medi-
cal work-up. The prevalence of hypochondriacal disorder in the general
population is unknown but has been estimated at 3%–10% in the outpa-
tient medical clinic population4 and 3% in medical students. A 1965 study
reported prevalence figures ranging from 3%–13% in different cultures,10
but it is unclear whether this represents a syndrome comparable to the
current definition of hypochondriacal symptoms. It does appear that
hypochondriacal disorder is equally common in males and females.
Similar to somatization disorder, hypochondriacal disorder is charac-
terized by the presence of unexplained symptoms and sensations (Table 2).
However, patients with hypochondriacal disorder take these symptoms
one step further by leaping to a catastrophic cognitive misinterpretation of
the significant of these symptoms, thereby convincing themselves that
324 C. L. Wichman
they have a physical disease.14 The belief of their disease state, however,
cannot have the intensity of a delusion; such a condition would be more
appropriately diagnosed as a delusional disorder.
Hypochondriacal disorder may have a chronic course, with waxing and
waning of symptoms. When the course is chronic, hypochondriacal disor-
der may appear similar to lifetime obsessive-compulsive disorder or as a
personality disorder. When the course is intermittent or of new onset, the
physician should search for predisposing stressful life events as the cause.
There are several general aspects to treatment of hypochondriacal dis-
order. Patients should have regularly scheduled physical examinations in
order to aid with reassurance that their physicians are not abandoning
them and that their complaints are being taken seriously. Thorough history
taking should occur during initial consultation, and clinicians should aid
patients with the identification of their stressors. Education about hypo-
chondriacal disorder, as well as about how stressors may be playing a role
in physical symptoms, is also quite useful. Cognitive behavioural therapy7
and supportive therapy, in an attempt to reduce stressors and identify a
relationship between stressors and physical symptoms, has proven to be
beneficial. From a pharmacologic standpoint, serotonergic medications,
such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, appear to have the most
benefit in this patient population.7
326 C. L. Wichman
There is a persistent severe and distressing pain (for at least six months, and
continuously on most days), in any part of the body, which cannot be explained
adequately by evidence of a physiological process or a physical disorder, and which is
consistently the main focus of the patient’s attention.
Most commonly used exclusion clause. This disorder does not occur in the presence of
schizophrenia or related disorders (F20–29), or only during any of the mood [affective]
disorder (F30–39), somatization disorder (F45.0), undifferentiated somatization disorder
(F45.1) or hypochondrical disorder (45.2).
G1. There must be no evidence of a physical disorder that can explain the characteristic
symptoms of this disorder (although physical disorders may be present that give rise
to other symptoms).
G2. There are convincing associations in time between the onset of symptoms of the
disorder and stressful events, problems or needs.
328 C. L. Wichman
have a rapid onset in the face of psychological stress and include non-
eliptiform seizures (pseudoseizures), blindness, deafness, paralysis, mut-
ism, falling, and psychogenic vomiting. Gait problems are also common;
astasia-abasia describes a dramatically unbalanced gait that could not
result from weakness or loss of balance without falls. Patients with asta-
sia-abasia do not fall but continue to walk in an unbalanced manner, with
writhing of the torso and often thrusting of limbs.
Treatment of dissociative disorders is generally quite conservative.
Providing patients with reassurance that the appropriate work-up has been
performed and that full recovery is expected is beneficial, as is addressing
identified stressors. Physical and occupational therapy are also key in
resolution of symptoms; initial symptoms of most patients resolve typi-
cally within a month with use of therapy. If the symptom can be resolved
by suggestion, hypnosis, or parenteral amobarbital24 it is probably the
result of a conversion disorder.
Patients with good prognostic factors are those who have onset of
symptoms following clear stressors and receive prompt treatment as com-
pared to those who have delayed treatment. Patients with symptoms of
paralysis, aphonia, or blindness have a better prognosis than those who
present with seizures or tremor.
6. FACTITIOUS DISORDER
Factitious disorder is defined as intentional exaggeration or induction of
signs and symptoms of illness in order to assume the sick role (Table 5).
For a diagnosis of factitious disorder, one must be able to establish the
330 C. L. Wichman
7. MALINGERING
Malingering (Z76.5) is the intentional production of illness; it is
distinguished from factitious disorder by the clarity of the motivation.
Patients who are malingering are motivated to obtain the sick role to gain
external incentives. The most common motives for malingering include
evading criminal prosecution, obtaining illicit drugs, avoiding military
332 C. L. Wichman
8. KEY POINTS
• The majority of patients with somatization disorder respond best to a
stable relationship with a primary care provider who provides on-
going, consistent care.
• Patients with somatization disorders have high rates of iatrogenic
morbidity and mortality; once diagnosed, patients should have proce-
dures and surgeries on the basis of objective findings, not subjective
symptoms described by the patient.
• Patients who do not meet full criteria for somatization disorder con-
tinue to have similar risks of complications and are likely to benefit
from the same treatment.
9. SELF-ASSESSMENT
9.1. A 50-year-old woman admitted to the hospital from
the neurology clinic complains in a dramatic fashion
of bilateral ankle pain that she suffered while at work.
Multiple physicians have been involved. Legal action for
worker’s compensation is pending, but the patient does
not want the medical staff to confirm this chain of events.
A thorough outpatient evaluation has not revealed a clear
etiology for the pain complaints. Psychiatry has been asked
to evaluate for depression contributing to her pain, which
was felt to be disproportionate to the injury. She denies any
depression, psychosis, or anxiety symptoms or family history
of psychiatric issues. Testing is negative, and she becomes
increasing labile and irritable and begins to demand a more
aggressive work-up to find out what is wrong. She continues
to complain of 10/10 pain without appearing subjectively
distressed. Given these facts, the correct diagnosis is:
(A) Somatization disorder.
(B) Conversion disorder.
(C) Factitious disorder.
(D) Malingering.
(E) Hypochondriacal disorder.
334 C. L. Wichman
This patient likely suffers from body dysmorphic disorder because she has
excessive concern about her appearance, without any identified defect by
a third party, and spends a significant amount of time preoccupied with
this concern. Patients with body dysmorphic disorder have an elevated
risk of suicide.16
Answer: A
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC.
2. Bass C, Peveler R, House A. (2001) Somatoform disorders: Severe psychiat-
ric illnesses neglected by psychiatrists. Br J Psych 879: 11–14.
3. Cloninger CR, Reich T and Guza SB. (1975) The multifactorial model of
disease transmission. III. Familial relationship between sociopathy and
hysteria. Br J Psych 127: 23–32.
4. Eschobar JI, Gara M, Waitzkin H, et al. (1998) DSN-IV hypochrondriasis in
primary care. Gen Hops Psych 20: 155–159.
5. Fink P, Rosendal M, Toft T. (2002) Assessment and treatment of functional
disorders in general practice: The extended reattribution and management
model — an advanced educational program for nonpsychiatric doctors.
Psychosomatics 43(2): 93–131.
6. Ford CV. (2005) Deception syndromes: Factitious disorders and malingering.
In: Levenson JL (ed.), Textbook of Psychosomatic Medicine, American
Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
7. Greeven A, van Balkom AJLM, Visswe S, et al. (2007) Cognitive behavior
therapy and paroxetine in the treatment of hypochondriasis: A randomized
controlled trial. Am J Psych 164: 91–99.
8. Hahn SR. (2001) Physical symptoms and physician-experienced difficulty in
the physician-patient relationship. Ann Intern Med 134(9 Pt 2): 897–904.
9. Kathol RG. (1997) Reassurance therapy: What to say to symptomatic
patients with benign or non-existent medical disease. Int J Psychiatry Med
27(2): 173–180.
10. Kenyon FE. (1965) Hypochondriasis: A surgery of some historical, clinical
and social aspects. Br J Psych 129: 1–14.
11. Kroenke K, Messina 3rd N, Benattia I, et al. (2006) Venlafaxine extended
release in the short-term treatment of depressed and anxious primary care
patients with multisomatoform disorder. J Clin Psych 67: 72–80.
12. Jakubietz M, Jakubietz RJ, Kloss DF, et al. (2007) Body dysmorphic
disorder: Diagnosis and approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 199: 1924–1930.
13. Knipschild P, Arntz A. (2005) Pain patients in a randomized trial did not
show a significant effect of a positive consultation. J Clin Epidemiol 58(7):
708–713.
14. Noyles Jr R, Stuart S, Watson DB, et al. (2006) Distinguishing between
hypochondriasis and somatization disorder: A review of the existing
literature. Psychother Psychosom 75: 270–281.
15. Phillips KA. (1998) Body dysmorphic disorder: Clinical aspects and
treatment strategies. Bull Menninger Clin Fall 62(4 Suppl A): A33–48.
336 C. L. Wichman
Chapter 14
Jean M. Goodwin
1. INTRODUCTION
Dissociation is defined as disruption in the normally integrated functions
of consciousness, memory, identity, and perception.1 Severe dissociation
almost always occurs in a context of multiple, severe, and often sadistic
traumatic experiences beginning in early childhood.
The dissociative disorders mark the severe end of a spectrum of
trauma responses, which involve both anxiety and dissociation, a spec-
trum that begins with the disorders involving acute responses to stress
and continues in intensity to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At the
most severe end of this spectrum, individuals with major dissociative
disorders often report extreme and multiple past trauma, as well as
describing severe anxiety and dissociation; they often meet criteria for
other trauma-related conditions and other dissociative disorders.
Comorbidities, listed in Table 1, co-occur more frequently in these more
severe cases.
This discussion begins with an overview of the spectrum and then
focuses on the most complex condition, Dissociative Identity Disorder
(DID, formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder).
337
338 J. M. Goodwin
340 J. M. Goodwin
3.1. Epidemiology
Nineteenth-century Anglo–European physicians encountered dissociative
symptoms in their explorations of hysteria and hypnosis.12 Hysterical sub-
jects manifested BASK symptoms in varying combinations; they tended
to be highly hypnotizable; they often described tragic and chaotic
childhoods.7
The first reported case of DID in North America was a British immi-
grant, Mary Reynolds, who was in her early twenties when she fell ill in
1811.6 At that time Shawnees were raiding settlements near her frontier
home and the War of 1812 was threatening to break out. Mary’s family
had fled religious persecution in England in the 1790s; Mary and her
brother had crossed the Atlantic on their own when they were both still
children; two of Mary’s closest sisters had died of infections. None of
these traumatic circumstances was noted by nineteenth-century commen-
tators. They focused instead on the phenomenology of her illness. Mary A,
the “original” personality was dour, staid, depressed, and often in ill
health. Mary A suffered periodic fainting spells. After a particularly
prolonged trance state, Mary B appeared, requiring to be spoon fed and
re-taught to speak and read and seeming to the family like a new-born
identity. Mary B was playful, irrepressible, and funny. She had no access
to Mary A’s litany of tragic memories and, like some patients with
psychogenic fugue, seemed prepared to start life anew with a new identity.
Mary A and Mary B were mutually amnestic and switched back and forth
for over a decade. At last, Mary seemed to stabilize in a state that she
described as a combination of both A and B. A close relationship with her
brother and with the local country doctor seemed to facilitate her
recovery.
Two hundred years later, we know that DID has been described in over
25 different countries, including Argentina, Turkey, Israel, Oman, Iran,
Australia, the Philippines, and Japan. It is difficult to estimate the preva-
lence of this disorder. It must be persistently under-diagnosed, because
many studies show that the average patient spends 5–13 years in the men-
tal health system before the diagnosis is made.8
342 J. M. Goodwin
can be disruptive if they emerge into everyday life. The capacity to fight
to the death, so necessary in combat, can lead, if re-enacted back home, to
criminal charges. The swift, compulsive eating that provides necessary
re-fuelling under attack can, if it becomes chronic, turn into a life-threat-
ening eating disorder.
As dissociation escalates to keep at bay both traumatic memories and
emergency protective mechanisms, dissociation itself becomes a problem,
with “trancing out,” “lost time,” and other trance-like disturbances of con-
sciousness intruding into the everyday world, as well as fragments of
traumatic experience.
344 J. M. Goodwin
Table 5. How survival impulses and fantasies in a sexually abused girl might lead to the
formation of internalized personified rescuers.
Survival impulse Internalized personified rescuer
“I wish I were somewhere else” “Space Alien” lives on another planet
“I wish it would be over” “Sexual Expert” brings her partners to climax
swiftly
“I’d feel better if I could throw up” “Queasy” is always nauseated
“I wish my mother would help” “Mommy” tries to protect younger siblings
“I wish he were dead” “Killer” is always hostile and threatening
346 J. M. Goodwin
treating these cases works within a narrow and paradoxical space, which
requires both firm boundaries and flexible emotional accessibility, both
comfortable expertise and utter respect for the patient’s autonomy. This
kind of psychotherapy requires a rare combination of expertise in psycho-
dynamic psychotherapy, skills in trauma therapy, and basic familiarity
with specific techniques for working with the internal system.
The clinical case gives examples of specific interventions in Stage One
work as well as sources for further study.10,15 The case, although illustra-
tive, is atypical in many ways: (a) male gender and diagnosis in middle
rather than early adulthood; (b) absence of significant comorbidities;
(c) presence of a relatively crisis-free present-day life with optimal access
to allies, resources, and treatment; and (d) an unusually free and creative
capacity for the use of imagery. In the more typical, more difficult case,
this stage might not be reached for many years, and when reached, the
work toward co-consciousness and cooperation might consume many
more years.10
Stage Two psychotherapy moves the treatment from stabilizing the
everyday life to the more painful and frightening zone of unprocessed
trauma memories and reactions. The clinician relies on the strong thera-
peutic alliance and emotional attunement achieved during Stage One.
Patients skilled in dissociation are quite capable of describing traumatic
experiences and then becoming so anxious that they re-dissociate every-
thing. This is to be avoided. All the anti-anxiety techniques learned in
Stage One are required here and more. Lifelong reliance on dissociation
may have left the patient bereft of other strategies for coping with anxiety.
Psycho-education, Dialectical Behavioural Therapy and other systematic
interventions to teach emotional containment may be required.
Some of the special techniques used in PTSD can be useful, such as
written trauma narratives or eye movement desensitization retraining.8
Imagery remains important. The traumatic episode can be put onto an
imaginary storage disc with many options for replay: (a) with certain
sections visually blocked; (b) without sound; (c) with restricted viewing
for child alters; (d) with the option to stop play after only a few seconds;
and so forth. Anxiety can be imagined as draining into an ocean of calm.
An anxiety alarm can be created in imagery that signals the system when
to close down processing and initiate calming measures. Managing the
group dynamics of the system remains important. Those alters who did
not experience a particular traumatic memory can sometimes comfort the
overwhelmed alter who is abreacting it.
Stage Three therapy is similar to psychodynamic work with other
adults who have grown up in chaotic environments. Unification and post-
unification strategies are the unique elements here.10 Stable fusions often
benefit from a special session in which relaxation and imagery are used to
consolidate the process. An example would be imaging the previous per-
sonalities as streams that have now flowed into one another. Post-
unification work involves careful exploration to ascertain that all the
BASK elements contained in the previously separate alters are represented
in the new configuration — skills, emotional capacities, bodily sensations,
motor functions, memories, and ways of thinking.
348 J. M. Goodwin
5. CASE STUDY
A 40-year-old married Italian–American professional was referred by his
marital therapist, who had observed that Frank responded in sessions in
widely disparate ways. He could be harshly accusatory of his wife,
extremely solicitous, coldly intellectual, or briskly business-like. At times,
he would simply walk out. Frank was relieved by the referral and eager to
talk for the first time about the 12 different “channels” that governed his
life.
“Husband” and “Papa” were the personalities most involved in the mar-
riage. “Husband” felt injured and misunderstood when his wife saw him
as over-controlling; he saw himself as a protector, not a perpetrator. He
explained that when he became angry, harsher personalities, like
“Enforcer,” would “jump in.” The abandoning alter, “Lefty,” was based on
his own childhood experience with a rejecting father. Mapping of the sys-
tem indicated that “Teenager,” “Intellectual,” and “Financial Guy” also
interacted with the wife. The clinician, talking through to all involved
personalities, planned appointments with each and suggested they form a
committee to improve the marriage. This committee began to meet at an
imagined table in an imaginary meeting place5 and soon reported that
other alters were “hanging out” nearby. They noted that together they
could block sudden takeovers by alters who were too young or too upset
to handle situations at an adult level. They were now managing switches
more smoothly; previously, switches had been accompanied by severe
headaches and confusion. Now the two involved alters simply touched the
“table” when they were ready to exchange places. “Enforcer” agreed to
change jobs and, instead of trying to limit the wife’s activities, took a
more backstage role in designing a security system for the home; he
warned that an angrier alter, “Bruiser,” was not yet ready to join the com-
mittee and helped design a glass booth using this imagery to contain the
threatening alter. “Papa” became involved in caring for the child alters and
built an imaginary playhouse near the table so that they could have a safe
place. He also helped the most traumatized child begin to draw pictures of
his abuse in an imaginary sketchbook. In the reality sphere, the adult alters
kept a daily journal, which they used to reconstruct lost time when that
occurred and to post questions that other alters might be able to address.
350 J. M. Goodwin
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Text Revision, American Psychiatric Association,
Washington, DC.
2. Barker P. (1991) Regeneration, Penguin, London.
3. Braun B. (1988) The BASK model of dissociation. Dissociation 1: 4–23.
4. Carlson EB. (1997) Trauma Assessments: A Clinician’s Guide, Guilford
Press, NY.
5. Fraser GA. (2003) Fraser’s “Dissociative table technique” revisited, revised.
J Traumatic Dissociation 4: 5–28.
6. Goodwin J. (1987) Mary Reynolds: Post-traumatic factors in the first
reported case of multiple personality disorder. Hillside J Clin Psychiatry 9:
89–99.
7. Goodwin J. (1993) Rediscovering Childhood Trauma. American Psychiatric
Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
8. International Society for Study of Traumatic Dissociation. (2010) Guidelines
for Treating Dissociative Identity Disorder in Adults.
9. Kluft RP. (1999) Body-ego integration in dissociative identity disorder. In:
Goodwin J, Attias R (eds), Splintered Reflections: Images of the Body in
Trauma, Chapter 11, pp. 239–255, Basic Books, NY.
10. Kluft RP. (1999) Current issues in dissociative identity disorder, J Pract
Psychiatr Behav Health 5: 3–19.
11. Loewenstein RJ. (1991) An office mental status examination for complex
chronic dissociative symptoms and multiple personality disorder. Psychiatr
Clin N Am 14: 567–604.
12. Nijenhuis ERS, van der Hart O. (1999) Somatoform dissociative phenomena:
A Janetian perspective. In: Goodwin J, Attias R (eds.), Splintered Reflections:
Images of the Body in Trauma, Chapter 4, pp. 89–128, Basic Books, NY.
13. Nijenhuis ERS, van der Hart O. (1999) Forgetting and re-experiencing
trauma. In: Goodwin J, Atttias R (eds.), Splintered Reflections: Images of the
Body in Trauma, Chapter 2, pp. 39–65, Basic Books, NY.
14. Nykiel SA, Baldessarini RJ, Bower MC, Goodwin J, Salvatore P. (2008)
Psychosis NOS: Search for diagnostic clarity. Harv Rev Psychiatry 16: 55–65.
15. Putnam FW. (1989) The Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality
Disorder, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
16. Ross CA, Heber S, Norton GR, Anderson D, Anderson G, Barchet P. (1989)
The dissociative disorders interview schedule: A structured interview.
Dissociation 2: 169–218.
17. Steele K, van der Hart O, Nijenhuis ERS. (2005) Phase-oriented treatment of
structural dissociation in complex traumatization: Overcoming trauma-
related phobias. J Trauma & Dissociation 6: 11–54.
18. Taylor SE. (2002) The Tending Instinct, Henry Holt (Macmillan), NY.
19. van der Hart O, Nijenhuis ERS, Steele K. (2006) The Haunted Self,
WW Norton, NY.
20. Volgyesi FA. (1963) Hypnosis of Man and Animals, Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, NY.
Chapter 15
Oludamilola A. Salami
1. INTRODUCTION
Sleep is an integral part of normal physiological functioning in humans
and is critical for good health. The lack of sleep produces significant
direct and indirect morbidity and mortality. The yearly prevalence of sleep
disorders varies from 20%–40% of adults. The wide range could be due
to the classification systems used in the diagnosis of sleep disorders. The
scope of sleep medicine is quite broad and has garnered multidisciplinary
interest from medical specialties including psychiatry, neurology, internal
medicine, and surgery. In this chapter, we will focus on the normal physi-
ology of sleep as well as the psychiatric aspects of its patho-physiology.
The clinical features and management of common sleep disorders will
also be discussed.
352
without sleep. However, as one may have noticed after remaining awake
for about 24 hrs, a burst of wakefulness often occurs, which would be
unexpected solely on the basis of homeostatic sleep mechanisms. This
process is due to the circadian rhythm. The circadian rhythm is based
roughly on a 24-hour sleep-wake cycle that is regulated by neurobiologi-
cal mechanisms and exogenous cues. Exogenous regulation is via
“zeitgeber,” which is a German term for “time giver.” “Zeitgeber” is
believed to synchronize the internal sleep mechanisms with the 24-hour
light/dark cycle. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is thought to be the
pacemaker of the circadian rhythm and is a key component in its regula-
tion. The SCN functions are modulated via the retino–hypothalamic tract,
where ambient light stimulates the melanopsin-containing retinal gan-
glion cells to aid in wakefulness during the day, and the pineal gland,
which secretes melatonin in response to diminished ambient light in the
evenings, promoting sleepiness. There are also neurotransmitter-based
systems that promote wakefulness through effects mediated via the
ascending reticular activating system located in areas of the midbrain and
brainstem. The key neurotransmitters thus identified include norepineph-
rine, serotonin, acetylcholine, glutamate, and dopamine.
3. STAGES OF SLEEP
There are two primary types of normal sleep: Rapid eye movement (REM)
sleep and Non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. NREM sleep is
further subdivided into NREM-1 and NREM-2 (formerly designated as
Stages 1 and 2) and NREM-3 (formerly Stages 3 and 4). NREM-1 and
NREM-2 are light stages of sleep, while NREM-3 encompasses deeper
sleep, with its characteristic slow wave sleep. The stages of sleep are
determined with the aid of a polysomnogram (PSG). The PSG involves
monitoring brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG), heart
rhythm with electrocardiography (EKG), skeletal muscle activity with
electromyography (EMG), eye movements with electrooculography
(EOG), nasal and oral airflow with pressure transducers, and blood oxy-
gen levels with pulse oximetry.
During periods of wakefulness, the EEG shows high-frequency waves
with low-amplitude, and the EMG reveals presence of muscle tone,
354 O. A. Salami
(4) Dyssomnias
(a) Intrinsic Sleep Disorders
(b) Extrinsic Sleep Disorders
(c) Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorders
356 O. A. Salami
(5) Parasomnias
(a) Arousal Disorders
(b) Sleep–Wake Transition Disorders
(c) Parasomnias Usually Associated with REM Sleep
(d) Other Parasomnias
(6) Sleep Disorders Associated with Mental, Neurologic, or Other
Medical Disorders
(a) Associated with Mental Disorders
(b) Associated with Neurologic Disorders
(c) Associated with Other Medical Disorders
(7) Proposed Sleep Disorders
(a) Short Sleeper
(b) Long Sleeper
(c) Sub-wakefulness Syndrome
(d) Fragmentary Myoclonus
(e) Sleep Hyperhidrosis
(f) Menstrual-Associated Sleep Disorder
(g) Pregnancy-Associated Sleep Disorder
(h) Terrifying Hypnagogic Hallucinations
(i) Sleep-Related Neurogenic Tachypnea
(j) Sleep-Related Laryngospasm
(k) Sleep Choking Syndrome
358 O. A. Salami
5.1. Dyssomnias
Dyssomnias are primary sleep disorders that are characterized by impair-
ment in the quantity, quality, or timing of sleep. Persons with the various
types of dyssomnias have difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep and
may also have complaints of excessive sleepiness.
Primary insomnia (Table 1) can be defined as sleep impairment that is
not directly attributable to a medical, psychiatric, or environmental cause.8
This category also loosely correlates to the ICD-10 classification for non-
organic insomnia. Primary insomnia affects up to 25% of patients with
chronic insomnia and can be regarded as a disorder of hyperarousal. Using
the ICSD classification, there are three types of primary insomnia: idio-
pathic insomnia, psycho–physiologic insomnia, and paradoxical insomnia
(formerly sleep-state misperception).
5.2. Management
The management of primary insomnia follows the same principles as other
medical disorders.6,10 It is important to take a good history and perform a
physical exam, guided by pertinent positives in the history. Elements of
good sleep history include the sleep symptoms causing distress and pattern
of sleep, including time to bed, awakening time, sleep latency, awakenings
during the night, and frequency of daytime naps. In addition, associated
symptoms should also be elicited: respiratory symptoms, including snoring
and apnoeic episodes; headaches and memory changes; gastrointestinal
symptoms; and cardiovascular, pulmonary, and mood symptoms. Questions
pertaining to sleep hygiene should also be asked and should include activi-
ties around bedtime, such as snacking, exercise, alcohol consumption,
ambient temperature in the room, and other environmental factors.
Further investigations may be warranted, if there is ambiguity regard-
ing the diagnosis. Patients are asked to keep a sleep diary or chart to
accurately monitor sleep habits. Other investigations include a sleep study.
The sleep study may either be a polysomnography, multiple sleep latency
test, or actigraphy. The multiple sleep latency test, which is an important
diagnostic tool, follows a polysomnography the night before and consists
of four or five 20-minute nap opportunities that are scheduled about two
hours apart. Actigraphy is a non-invasive method of monitoring human
rest/activity cycles by measuring gross skeletal motor activity.
5.3. Treatment
Non-pharmacological strategies aimed at ameliorating insomnia are based
on cognitive behavior therapy and include attention to sleep hygiene,
patient education, stimulus control, behavioral interventions, sleep restric-
tion therapy, and relaxation therapy.
(a) Sleep hygiene and education involves maintaining healthy and regular
sleep habits (e.g. avoiding exercise shortly before bed, no alcohol
before bed, consistent time to bed).
(b) Stimulus control includes creating a quiet and comfortable sleep
environment.
(c) Sleep restriction is a strategy used in regulating the timing of sleep by
staying awake even when sleepy in order to fall asleep within a desir-
able period of time.
(d) Relaxation therapy incorporates strategies for unwinding and distrac-
tion to achieve a cognitive state suitable for sleep.
360 O. A. Salami
(A) The predominant complaint is excessive sleepiness for at least one month (or less if
recurrent) as evidenced by either prolonged sleep episodes or daytime sleep
episodes that occur almost daily.
(B) The excessive sleepiness causes clinically significant distress or impairment in
social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
(C) The excessive sleepiness is not better accounted for by insomnia and does not occur
exclusively during the course of another sleep disorder (e.g. narcolepsy, breathing-
related sleep disorder, circadian rhythm sleep disorder, or a parasomnia) and cannot
be accounted for by an inadequate amount of sleep.
(D) The disturbance does not occur exclusively during the course of another mental
disorder.
(E) The disturbance is not due to the direct physiological effects of a substance
(e.g. a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition.
5.5. Narcolepsy
Patients with narcolepsy (Table 3) report excessive sleepiness with recur-
rent daytime napping. They also report sudden muscle weakness or bilat-
eral loss of postural muscle tone occurring in the context of intense
emotion. Other clinical features include sleep paralysis, hypnagogic hal-
lucinations, and polysomnographic evidence of short overall and REM
sleep latency and two or more sleep-onset REM periods. Patients may be
DQB1or DR2 positive on HLA typing.
As with most sleep disorders, treatments include both non-pharmaco-
logical and pharmacological strategies. Non-pharmacological interven-
tions involve good sleep hygiene and modulating the environment to
optimize conditions suitable for sleep, with limitation of sleep-inhibiting
362 O. A. Salami
(A) Irresistible attacks of refreshing sleep that occurs daily over at least three months.
(B) The presence of one or both of the following:
(1) Cataplexy (i.e. brief episodes of sudden bilateral loss of muscle tone, most often
in association with intense emotion).
(2) Recurrent intrusions of elements of REM sleep into the transition between sleep
and wakefulness, as manifested by either hypnopompic or hypnagogic
hallucinations or sleep paralysis at the beginning or end of sleep episodes.
(C) The disturbance is not due to the direct physiological effects of a substance
(e.g. a drug of abuse, a medication) or another general medical condition.
stimuli. Scheduled naps during the day help to reduce excessive daytime
somnolence and improve function. Patients should also exercise good
judgment and avoid driving and other activities that require a high level of
concentration and focus when they feel sleepy.
Pharmacological treatments include agents targeting excessive sedation
and cataplexy. CNS stimulants such as methylphenidate and ampheta-
mines and their derivatives have been the mainstay medications for pro-
moting wakefulness. Modafinil is a relatively new agent with a poorly
understood mechanism of action, which is being used with increasing
frequency to promote alertness. Modafinil has a favorable side effect pro-
file in comparison to methylphenidate and other stimulants. Sodium oxy-
bate (Xyrem) is a CNS depressant that is approved by the US Food and
Drug Administration for the treatment of cataplexy.
(A) Sleep disruption, leading to excessive sleepiness or insomnia that is judged to be due
to a sleep-related breathing condition (e.g. obstructive or central sleep apnoea
syndrome or central alveolar hypoventilation syndrome).
(B) The disturbance is not better accounted for by another mental disorder and is not due
to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g. a drug of abuse, a medication)
or another general medical condition (other than a breathing-related disorder).
mouth. PSG shows over five apnoeic episodes per hour of greater than
10 secs in duration in addition to frequent arousals from sleep or arterial
oxygen desaturations associated with the episodes of apnoea. OSA is
associated with several medical and psychiatric disorders including
GERD; mood disorders (particularly depression); cognitive impairment
with impaired attention, concentration and memory; hypertension; and
cardiac arrhythmias. Management involves mitigating the risk factors,
including weight loss and treatment via mechanically maintaining airway
patency with use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Other
treatment options include use of a dental appliance to anchor the lower
jaw and/or surgical intervention.
Central sleep apnoea syndrome (CSAS) is characterized by a cessa-
tion or reduction of ventilatory effort during sleep and is often associ-
ated with oxygen desaturations. Patients report either insomnia or
excessive sleepiness with frequent episodes of shallow or absent breath-
ing during sleep. Other clinical features include complaints of frequent
motor activity, with gasping, grunting, or choking during sleep often
reported by their partners. Polysomnography demonstrates central
apnoeic pauses more than 10 secs in adults in addition to frequent arous-
als from sleep and oxygen desaturations associated with the apnoea.
CSAS is often associated with systemic and pulmonary hypertension,
cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac failure, cognitive impairment, and depres-
sive symptoms.
Central alveolar hypoventilation syndrome is characterized by ventila-
tory impairment, resulting in sleep-related arterial oxygen desaturations
that occur in patients with normal mechanical properties of the lung.
There is diminished physiological response to hypercapnia or hypoxia
364 O. A. Salami
366 O. A. Salami
5.7.4. Treatment
Treatment options are aimed at resetting the circadian rhythm and
include bright light therapy at over 5,000 Lux for 30–60 mins, chrono-
therapy, and stimulus control. Bright light therapy should be adminis-
tered on the basis of the disruption to the circadian rhythm. If the sleep
phase is advanced, bright light should be administered later in the day to
delay sleep onset and vice versa for a delay in the sleep phase.
Chronotherapy involves shifting the sleep time gradually to the desired
sleep period.
5.9. Parasomnias
The parasomnias are disorders of arousal or partial arousal from central
nervous system activation with motor and verbal manifestation. Parasomnias
occur during specific stages of sleep or during sleep-stage and sleep–wake
transitions. These disorders can be categorized into four groups using the
DSM-IV-TR classification system.
368 O. A. Salami
(A) Repeated awakenings from the major sleep period or naps with detailed recall of
extended and extremely frightening dreams, usually involving threats to survival,
security, or self-esteem. The awakenings generally occur during the second half of
the sleep period.
(B) On awakening from the frightening dreams, the person rapidly becomes oriented
and alert (in contrast to the confusion and disorientation seen in sleep terror disorder
and some forms of epilepsy).
(C) The dream experience, or the sleep disturbance resulting from the awakening, causes
clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other
important areas of functioning.
(D) The nightmares do not occur exclusively during the course of another mental
disorder (e.g. a delirium, posttraumatic stress disorder) and are not due to the direct
physiological effects of a substance (e.g. a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general
medical condition.
370 O. A. Salami
(A) Repeated episodes of rising from bed during sleep and walking about,
usually occurring during the first third of the major sleep episode.
(B) While sleepwalking, the person has a blank, staring face, is relatively
unresponsive to the efforts of others to communicate with him or her,
and can be awakened only with great difficulty.
(C) On awakening (either from the sleepwalking episode or the next
morning), the person has amnesia for the episode.
(D) Within several minutes after awakening from the sleepwalking episode,
there is no impairment of mental activity or behavior (although there
may initially be a short period of confusion or disorientation).
(E) The sleepwalking causes clinically significant distress or impairment
in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
(F) The disturbance is not due to the direct physiological effects of a
substance (e.g. a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical
condition.
onset and are sustained into light sleep, in contrast to sleep starts,
which are sudden, brief and non-stereotyped leg, arm, or neck con-
tractions that occur at the onset of sleep.
(c) Sleeptalking: This phenomenon involves the production of sounds or
comprehensible speech during sleep without simultaneous subjective
detailed awareness of the event.
(d) Nocturnal leg cramps: These are painful sensations of muscular tight-
ness or tension, usually in the calf but occasionally in the foot that
occur during the sleep episode.
(e) Sleep paralysis: Sleep paralysis consists of a period of inability to
perform voluntary movements at sleep onset (hypnagogic form) or
upon awakening, either during the night or in the morning (hypnop-
ompic form).
(f) REM sleep behavior disorder: This is characterized by the intermit-
tent loss of REM sleep, electromyographic (EMG) atonia, and the
appearance of elaborate motor activity associated with dream
mentation.
REM sleep behavior disorder can be treated with low dose clonazepam.
The treatment of the parasomnias involves supportive management.
372 O. A. Salami
374 O. A. Salami
7. KEY POINTS
• Insomnia and hypersomnia are the main characteristics of sleep
disturbance.
• Sleep disturbance occurs as a symptom of primary sleep disorders and
also as a common feature of medical, psychiatric, and neurologic
disorders.
• Sleep disorders can be classified under two major classification
systems: DSM-IV and ICSD.
• Sleep disturbance varies in severity from mild to severe and can pro-
duce a profound impairment with social and occupational function.
• Treatment of sleep disturbance involves both non-pharmacological
and pharmacological interventions.
8. SELF-ASSESSMENT
8.1. Mr J, a 27-year-old construction worker, is diagnosed
with major depression. His most distressing symptom
is insomnia. A polysomnogram in this patient would
most likely show which of the following?
(A) Decreased REM sleep.
(B) Increased REM latency.
(C) Increased REM sleep density.
(D) Increased NREM-3 sleep.
376 O. A. Salami
9. CASE STUDIES
9.1. Primary sleep disorder
Julia, a 20-year-old college student, presents with complaints of difficulty
falling asleep and waking up several times over the course of the night for
six months. She feels tired in the morning and often turns off her alarm
clock to get more sleep. In addition, her roommate snores loudly. She
states that she is frequently arriving late for her morning classes and is
having difficulty concentrating, sleeping through most of the morning,
and struggling to stay awake. She reports that her symptoms began shortly
after her final examinations. During her exams, she would stay up late
studying and had irregular sleeping hours. She has since had difficulty
with sleep. Her grades have declined due to impaired attention at school.
She also reports difficulty with short-term memory and feelings of
depressed mood.
Julie was diagnosed with a primary sleep disorder. She was educated
on good sleep hygiene measures, and a non-pharmacological regimen of
was designed aimed at improving sleep function.
9.3. Parasomnia
Marie, a 32-year-old social worker who is accompanied by her husband,
presents with complaints of early morning fatigue. She states that her
husband has asked her to sleep in a different room due to several instances
of striking him while she is asleep. She has no recollection of the events
but states that she does not feel rested upon awakening. She adds that she
has been dreaming more frequently than usual. Her husband reports that
she speaks in her sleep and also appears as if she is in trance. He describes
her as often acting out in her sleep, and she has struck out at him several
times. She reports that she recalls a similar family history in her paternal
grandfather, as reported by her grandmother. Marie had a sleep study
done with video monitoring and was noted getting up several times over
the course of the night. She initially walked around the bed, then stood
on the bed and imitated changing a light bulb. Following the sleep study,
she reported no recollection of the events. She was diagnosed with a
parasomnia and prescribed clonazepam, with complete resolution of
symptoms.
378 O. A. Salami
REFERENCES
1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. (2001) International Classification
of Sleep Disorders, revised. American Academy of Sleep Medicine Diag-
nostic and Coding Manual, Chicago, IL.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Text Revision, American Psychiatric
Association, Washington, DC.
3. Datta S, Maclean RR. (2007) Neurobiological mechanisms for the regulation
of mammalian sleep wake behavior: Reinterpretation of historical evidence
and inclusion of contemporary cellular and molecular evidence. Neuroscience
and biobehavioral reviews 31(5): 775–824.
4. Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ, Grebb JA. (1994) Normal sleep and sleep disorders.
In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of
Psychiatry, 7th ed. pp. 699–716, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore,
MD.
5. Kyung LE, Douglass AB. (2010) Sleep in psychiatric disorders: Where
are we now? Can J Psychiatry, Revue Canadienne de Psychiatri 55(7):
403–412.
6. Loewy DH, Black JE. (2000) Effective management of transient and
chronic insomnia. In: CNS News, pp. 19–22, McMahon Publishing Group,
NY.
7. Richert AC, Baran AS. (2003) A review of common sleep disorders. CNS
Spectr 8(2): 102–109.
8. Roth T, Roehrs T. (2003) Insomnia: Epidemiology, characteristics, and con-
sequences. Clin Cornerstone 5(3): 5–15.
9. Salami O, Lyketsos C, Rao V. (2011) Treatment of sleep disturbance in
Alzheimer’s dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 26(8): 771–782.
10. Schenck CH, Mahowald MW, Sack RL. (2003) Assessment and management
of insomnia. JAMA 289(19): 2475–2479.
Chapter 16
Eating Disorders
1. INTRODUCTION
The three major eating disorders are anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa,
and binge eating disorder. The diagnostic criteria for the International
Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems25 and
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition3
for each of these major disorders are listed in Table 1. The eating disorders
may occur in sub-clinical forms, classified as eating disorder not other-
wise specified, and, as such, form the largest category. Other potentially
distinct syndromes, for which there is not enough evidence to form a
diagnostic classification, are incorporated within the eating disorder not
otherwise specified category and include night eating syndrome and vom-
iting disorder. Less common disorders, at least in developed countries,
include pica. In addition, there are specific childhood eating disorders,
including selective eating, comprising neophobia and picky eating, and
food avoidance emotional disorder. Often neglected by clinicians as
“trivial,” the eating disorders are frequently comorbid with other psychi-
atric illnesses, including mood, anxiety, impulse-control, and substance-
use disorders. In addition, these disorders may significantly affect health
and well-being. For example, anorexia nervosa is characterized by marked
weight loss and associated with disorders secondary to malnutrition, such
as osteoporosis, compromised cardiovascular functioning, and numerous
379
Table 1. (Continued)
International Statistical
Classification of Diseases
and Related Health Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorder Problems 10 Criteria Disorders IV criteria
Over concern with body A sense of lack of control over eating during
shape and weight. the episode (e.g. a feeling that one cannot
Repeated vomiting is stop eating or control what or how much
likely to give rise to one is eating).
disturbances of body Recurrent inappropriate compensatory
electrolytes and physical behavior in order to prevent weight gain,
complications. such as self-induced vomiting; misuse of
May be preceded by an laxatives, diuretics, enemas, or other
episode of anorexia medications; fasting; or excessive
nervosa. exercise.
The binge eating and inappropriate
compensatory behaviors both occur, on
average, at least twice a week for three
months.
Binge Recurrent episodes of binge eating.
Eating Associated features of binge eating:
Disorder Eating much more rapidly than normal.
Eating until uncomfortably full.
Eating in the absence of hunger.
Eating alone because of embarrassment over
the amount eaten.
Feelings of disgust, depression, or guilt after
overeating.
Binge eating occurs at least two days per
week, on average, for a six-month period.
Note: See the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 1025 and
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV3 for additional details.
2. EPIDEMIOLOGY
Eating disorders are prevalent across the world, both in developed and
developing countries. Data from various studies suggest a 1% lifetime
prevalence of anorexia nervosa in adults, 1.5% for bulimia nervosa, and
2%–3% for binge eating disorder. The total prevalence of eating disorders,
including eating disorder not otherwise specified, would approximate
6%–8%.
Historically, epidemiological studies of eating disorders have focused
on white women and girls, and relatively little research has been con-
ducted with participants from racial and ethnic minority groups.
Consequently, research before the mid-1990s typically reported that
eating disorders affected primarily white women of high socioeconomic
classes and were less common among specific minority groups. However,
more recent empirical studies suggest that minority populations are sub-
stantially affected by disordered eating behaviors. Table 2 outlines the
prevalence rates for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating
disorder and the presence of any binge eating within the United States and
various countries abroad.
Preliminary conclusions regarding the prevalence of eating disorders
among ethnic minorities within the United States are that anorexia ner-
vosa is rare among blacks, data are mixed on whether rates of bulimia
nervosa among ethnic minority and white females differ, and rates of
binge eating among ethnic minorities are higher than other forms of dis-
ordered eating. Available global data suggest a lifetime prevalence pattern
comparable to those found within the United States; anorexia nervosa is
the least frequently occurring disorder, followed by bulimia nervosa, and
a significant per cent of individuals endorse any binge eating and/or meet
sub threshold diagnostic criteria.
Erroneous assumptions about eating disorder prevalence, cultural influ-
ence, course of illness, and access to treatment among minority persons can
Eating Disorders
Table 2. Prevalence rates of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and any binge eating.
Lifetime prevalence
n (%)
Binge Sub-
Anorexia Bulimia eating Any Binge threshold
Reference Sample Nervosa nervosa disorder eating syndrome
Streigel-Moore et al.19 (United States 985 white women 15 (1.5) 23 (2.3) 27 (2.7) — —
B1405
sample)
1061 black women 0 4 (.4) 15 (1.4) — —
383
1/31/2013 2:39:48 PM
create referral biases and differences in service availability and access and,
consequently, make it more difficult to estimate the true prevalence of eating
disorders among men, women, children, and adolescents across the world.
Data are needed to further our understanding about disordered eating behav-
iors among all ethnic and racial groups in order to prevent bias in assess-
ment, prevention, and intervention endeavors. Primary care physicians are
often the first viable line of eating disorder assessment and referral. It is
therefore imperative that primary care physicians are aware of disordered
eating presentations in order to provide needed evaluation and intervention.
4. ANOREXIA NERVOSA
Anorexia nervosa is a serious psychiatric illness characterized by purpose-
ful and sustained weight loss, refusal to gain weight, intense fear of weight
gain, overvaluation of body weight and shape, and intrusive and pathologi-
cal thoughts and behaviors surrounding food and weight (see Table 1 for
diagnostic criteria). The disorder may include episodes of binge eating,
Note: High evidence=at least one adequately sized outcome study that has been replicated; Moderate
evidence=at least one adequately sized outcome study with no replication to date; Further research
needed=no adequately sized outcome study to date.
AN=anorexia nervosa; BN=bulimia nervosa; BED=binge eating disorder; BFT=behavioral family
therapy; CBT=cognitive behavioral therapy; IPT=interpersonal psychotherapy; DBT=dialectical
behavior therapy; GSH=guided self-help.
for either adolescent or adult patients with anorexia nervosa. BFT for
adolescent anorexia nervosa appears promising and should be regarded as
the treatment of choice at this point but awaits the results of further
studies.
5. BULIMIA NERVOSA
Bulimia nervosa is a disabling disorder that has a profound impact on the
lives of those affected. Bulimia nervosa typically arises in adolescence,
with a peak onset at 18 years of age. Core features of the disorder include
repeated episodes of binge eating accompanied by a sense of loss of con-
trol, guilt, and remorse. There is an intense fear of fatness and purposeful
attempts to control weight through dieting and/or compensatory behaviors
such as self-induced vomiting, excessive exercise, or abuse of laxatives,
diuretics, diet pills (see Table 1). About a quarter of individuals with
bulimia nervosa report a previous history of anorexia nervosa.
and maintain weight loss pursuing behaviors. Thus, CBT intervenes via
behavioral techniques to replace restrained eating with more regular
eating patterns and cognitive techniques to restructure problematic
thoughts that over-evaluate shape and weight.
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is based on the observation that
interpersonal issues frequently trigger binge eating and purging.
Interpersonal issues are conceptualized within one of four domains (grief,
interpersonal role disputes, role transitions, and interpersonal deficits) and
works to decrease binge eating and purging by directly addressing these
social and interpersonal deficits. Both treatments are administered in
18–20 sessions over a six-month period in either individual or group
mode.
When compared to IPT, CBT yields significantly higher rates of absti-
nence from binge eating and lower rates of purging at post treatment.2
By 8- and 12-month follow-up, however, the two treatments were no
longer significantly different from one another. Interestingly, participants
in the IPT condition rated their treatment as more suitable and expected
greater success than did CBT participants. At present, CBT is regarded as
the treatment of choice because of its quicker action, and thus IPT is indi-
cated as a second-level treatment. A more complex version of CBT, trans-
diagnostic CBT, may be more effective than standard CBT for individuals
with more complex psychopathology. Neither CBT nor IPT for bulimia
nervosa have been explored with adolescents.
of 64% for DBT-BED versus 33.3% for the active comparison group
therapy), there were no significant group differences in abstinence rates at
any other follow-up assessment point through 12 months. DBT-BED
yields low drop-out rates suggesting that it is a highly acceptable treat-
ment for most participants and superior to supportive therapy in maintain-
ing engagement in treatment.18 Additional empirical evidence of
DBT-BED’s effectiveness compared to CBT and IPT is now needed.
7. OBESITY
Some of the eating disorders, most frequently binge eating disorder and
more rarely bulimia nervosa, are associated with overweight and obesity.
Overweight and obesity increase risk for many diseases, including hyper-
tension, cardiovascular disease, stroke, gallbladder disease, osteoarthritis,
sleep apnoea, and endometrial, breast, prostate, and colon cancers.
Overweight is defined as a body mass index of 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2, and
obesity is defined as ≥ 30 kg/m2. The World Health Organization estimates
that there are approximately 180 million obese adults worldwide and at least
twice as many overweight adults. However, many Asian experts consider
lower body mass index cut-off points appropriate for their populations,
given that medical conditions associated with overweight (e.g., glucose
intolerance, hypertension, diabetes) emerge at body mass indices above
23.0, with few of the overall population having indices greater than 30.
The two most common medications presently in use are orlistat, now sold
over the counter as “Alli,” and phentermine.
Orlistat inhibits gastrointestinal lipase, thus preventing fat absorption,
leading to effects such as oily stools, diarrhea, and fecal spotting. These
side effects can be eliminated by reducing fat intake. The dose of orlistat
is 60 mg three times daily. If taken regularly, orlistat leads to weight
loss, with differences between placebo and drug, of between 3 and 5 kg.
Beneficial effects on blood pressure, serum lipid profiles, and carbohy-
drate metabolism have been found. Orlistat has been approved for longer-
term weight loss. Some concern has arisen about cases of severe liver
damage that have been reported with Orlistat use. It should also be
remembered that the activity of fat soluble drugs such as warfarin, thyrox-
ine, and cyclosporine, as well as fat soluble vitamins, is affected by orl-
istat. Hence, orlistat is contraindicated in patients taking such drugs, and
patients should also take multivitamins.
Phentermine, the second most common medication used for weight
loss, is a noradrenergic sympathomimetic amine approved for short-term
(e.g. a few weeks) treatment. Side effects include raised blood pressure
and heart rate with central nervous system stimulation and insomnia. The
dosage of phentermine is 37.5 mg daily, usually taken in the morning
because of stimulant effects, and weight losses are modest.
8. PICA
Pica is defined as craving for, and consuming, substances such as earth,
clay, ash, and charcoal, first described by Hippocrates in the 4th century
BC. Pica is seen most frequently in less developed countries or in sub-
populations in developed countries, for example, in institutions for the
mentally ill or in poverty-stricken rural areas. In some African countries
pica occurs in almost three quarters of pregnant women. Both children and
adults may be affected. The etiology of the disorder is unknown. The three
principal hypotheses concerning etiology are that (1) the behavior is
driven by hunger caused by malnutrition; (2) the behavior is driven by
micronutrient deficiencies that could be remedied by the ingested materi-
als; or (3) the ingestion of these substances protects against pathogens and
toxins in the gut. All three of these mechanisms have been observed in
different populations. Animal experiments have shown that ingestion of
some earths does protect against toxins. Pica may lead to anemia by
competing with nutritive foods, particularly in pregnant women.
Cases of pica should be evaluated carefully because this condition may
be associated with celiac or renal disease. In addition, pica may lead to
anemia or other disorders of inadequate nutrition. Little is known about
the treatment of this disorder. Antidepressants have been used successfully
in some cases that have been conceptualized as an obsessive-compulsive
(OCD) spectrum disorder with other evidence of OCD. Some behavioral
procedures have also been used in children and institutionalized adults.
9. DISORDERS OF CHILDHOOD
Childhood eating disorders have not been well defined into separate
syndromes at this point, and there are very few treatment studies. Hence,
no evidence-based treatments are available for these disorders, which
include selective eating (neophobia and picky eating), food phobias, and
triggered by some event, for example, after nausea has been paired with a
specific food during an illness or after choking on some food. Because a
food phobia is usually specific to one type of food, treatment is usually
unnecessary. However, food phobia associated with a fear of choking
should be treated as any other phobia, with graduated exposure to the
feared foods, often all solid foods. Hence, a gradient from liquid foods to
solid foods is required.
12. SELF-ASSESSMENT
12.1. On the basis of the current empirical literature, which
of the following is presently the recommended treatment
of choice for bulimia nervosa?
(A) Dialectical behavior therapy.
(B) Interpersonal psychotherapy.
(C) Cognitive behavioral therapy.
(D) Behavioral family therapy.
(E) The available empirical data is insufficient to support a particular
therapy.
Answer: C2
worried about her weight and shape since high school. Early in college,
she began limiting the types of foods she allowed herself to have and
began intensely exercising as a means of influencing her weight and
shape. She continues to use intense exercise as a means of weight control,
even though her weight has never been out of the healthy range for her
height. Presently, she binges and purges about once per day which is down
from three daily binges and purges last year. Lucy reports that many
things appear to trigger her binge episodes, including hunger and/or feel-
ing lonely, sad, or bored. Lucy has a number of “food rules,” which
demand a diet very limited in fat and carbohydrates and specify off-limit
foods (such as sweets, cereal, breads, and red meat). On her “good days”
she reports eating fruits, vegetables, non-fat yogurt, and lean pieces of
chicken. During binge episodes, however, Lucy noticed that she tends to
overeat foods that she otherwise forbids herself. Lucy reports that she
feels ashamed about her eating and often suffers from intense worry and
sadness over the financial position her binging has left her in. Although
she maintains a steady job, her social life has suffered, because of the time
dedicated to shopping for binge foods and binging and purging rather than
being with friends and family. A recent visit to the dentist, where the
doctor informed her of the extensive and severe dental enamel decay and
erosion that the purging has caused, prompted Lucy to come to therapy.
calories and feels guilty and disgusted. Tony noted that he has these eating
episodes about three or four times per week, depending upon how stressed
out he is. Outside of the binge eating episodes, Tony eats regularly and has
three meals and a couple of snacks daily. Sometimes he goes through
phases where he will try to eat “healthfully” and cut down on calorie and
fat intake, but he generally does not restrict his intake. Tony noted that
these “healthy” eating periods do not last very long. In addition, he
reported that he has some marital concerns but is mainly very distressed
about his weight and eating problems. Tony said that his wife knows that
he “overeats” now and then but that she does not know the extent of the
problem or how much it bothers him.
REFERENCES
1. Alegria M, Woo M, Cao Z, Torres M, Meng X, Striegel-Moore R. (2007)
Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in Latinos in the United States.
Int J Eat Disord 40: S15–S21.
2. Agras WS, Walsh BT, Fairburn CG, Wilson GT, Kramer HC. (2000) A
multicenter comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal
psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57: 459–466.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington,
DC.
4. Attia E, Haiman C, Walsh BT, Flater SR. (1998) Does fluoxetine augment
the inpatient treatment of anorexia nervosa? Am J Psychiatry 155: 548–551.
5. Chen ZF, Mitchell JE, Li K, Yu WM, Lan YD, Jun Z, et al. (2006) The
prevalence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa among freshman
medical college students in China. Int Eat Disord 12(2): 209–214.
6. Cooper Z, Doll HA, Hawker DM, Byrne S, Bonner G, Eeley E, et al. (2010)
Testing a new cognitive behavioral treatment for obesity: A randomized
controlled trial with three-year follow-up. Behav Res Ther 48: 706–713.
7. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z. (1993) The eating disorder examination. In: Fairburn
CG, Wilson GT (eds.), Binge Eating: Nature, Assessment and Treatment,
12th ed. pp. 317–360, Guilford Press, NY.
8. Hay P. (1998) The epidemiology of eating disorder behaviors: An Australian
community-based survey. Int J Eat Disord 23(4): 371–382.
22. Wadden TA, Berkowitz RI. (2002) Very-low calorie diets. In: Fairbun CG,
Brownell KD (eds.), Eating Disorders and Obesity: A Comprehensive
Handbook, 2nd ed. pp. 534–538, Guilford Press, NY.
23. Wilfley DE, Welch R, Stein RI, Spurrell EB, Cohen LR, Saelens BE, et al.
(2002) A randomized comparison of group cognitive-behavioral therapy and
group interpersonal psychotherapy for the treatment of overweight
individuals with binge eating disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59(8): 713–721.
24. Wilson GT, Wilfley DE, Agras WS, Bryson S. (2010) Psychological treat-
ments of binge eating disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67: 94–101.
25. World Health Organization. (2007) International Statistical Classification of
Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, World Health
Organization, Geneva.
Chapter 17
Sexual Disorders
Richard Balon
1. INTRODUCTION
Sex is one of the three basic drives, the other ones being sleeping and eat-
ing. Although the underlying basic role of sex is reproduction, sex plays
other important roles, such as providing pleasure, satisfaction, and feel-
ings of well-being. Human sexuality is a complex affair regulated at vari-
ous levels. Seemingly simple sexual events, e.g. erection, are regulated
by multiple systems — central nervous system, peripheral nervous sys-
tem, vascular system, endocrine glands — and influenced by many fac-
tors, such as previous experience, childhood trauma, stage of development,
interpersonal relationship, life circumstances, culture, and medications.
Age is also an important factor — sexuality usually peaks in early
adulthood and then gradually declines.
It is important to realize that sex, like the other basic drives, could be
impacted by various mental and physical illnesses. Impairment of basic
drives could be part of the symptomatology of an underlying illness — for
instance, decreased libido, inability to maintain sleep, and decreased
appetite could be all part of major depressive disorder symptomatology;
or impaired erectile function and changes of appetite could be part of
diabetes mellitus symptomatology. One should bear this in mind during
the evaluation of any patient complaining of impairment of any of the
basic drives. Discerning between the basic drive dysfunction due to
409
410 R. Balon
2. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
2.1. Epidemiology
Although sexual dysfunctions/disorders are thought to occur frequently,
the exact incidence and prevalence are difficult to establish for various
reasons. In the case of sexual dysfunctions, the patient may not be forth-
right in reporting sexual difficulties because he or she may be ashamed,
may feel the issue of sexual functioning is too private to talk about, or,
incorrectly, may feel that his or her way of sexual functioning is “normal.”
Various studies on sexual dysfunctions associated with antidepressants
illustrate the difficulties in estimating the frequency of sexual dysfunc-
tions. In these studies the patients filled out questionnaires about sexual
dysfunctions first and were subsequently interviewed by experienced cli-
nicians. Invariably, the estimates of sexual dysfunctions’ frequency were
significantly higher when patients were interviewed by clinicians. These
findings warn us that we need to interpret the results of epidemiological
studies with some caution. The reporting of paraphilias is even more com-
plicated — paraphilias are relatively rare and not socially acceptable; thus
patients usually do not seek help and do not report their difficulties unless
they are seriously distressed. In addition, comorbidity with other disorders
412 R. Balon
2.2. Etiology
The etiology of sexual dysfunctions is frequently multifactorial, involving
biological, psychological, interpersonal, and, at times, cultural factors.
In some cases, such as erectile dysfunction in a man suffering from diabetes
mellitus and atherosclerosis, the etiology is obvious. In other cases, such as
lifelong male orgasmic disorder, the cause is mostly unknown. Biological
factors possibly involved in sexual dysfunction include endocrinopathies,
cardiovascular diseases, injury, urological diseases, medications, and sub-
stance abuse. Psychological factors include stress, clinical depression, vari-
ous other mental disorders, anxiety, and sexual abuse, while interpersonal
factors include marital conflict, partner’s sexual dysfunction, extramarital
affair, homosexual conflict, religious differences and conflict, cultural dif-
ferences, childbearing demands, and others.
The etiology of paraphilias and gender identity disorders has been
a subject of various psychological theories but is basically unknown. Men
with paraphilias, in general, have difficulties with attachment and inti-
macy, high levels of neuroticism, lower agreeableness, and lower consci-
entiousness. There have been attempts to explain some paraphilias (e.g.
voyeurism, exhibitionism, and frotteurism) in terms of courtship disorder
theory9 — impairment of one of the four sequential phases of a normal
2.3. Genetics
No data are available on the genetics of low sexual desire, sexual aversion,
and arousal dysfunction. According to Australian female twin studies,
genetics may account for some variance of orgasm during coitus (31%)
and masturbation (51%). Premature ejaculation may have a familiar
pattern. No solid data from genetic studies of paraphilias are available.
Similarly, no solid genetic studies of gender identity disorders are
available.
414 R. Balon
(Continued)
Table 1. (Continued)
416 R. Balon
418 R. Balon
General/introductory questions
The questioning should start with an introductory statement such as, “Let me ask you a
few questions about your sex life I ask all patients, as I consider sex life to be an
important part of a person’s life.”
1. Can you tell me whether you are satisfied with your sexual functioning and if not,
why not?
2. Is your partner satisfied with the frequency and quality of your sexual encounters?
3. How often do you have sex?
4. Who starts sex, you or your partner?
5. Are there any differences in sexual interest/demand between you and your partner?
Questions about sexual desire/libido
1. Have you observed any changes in getting hard or having an erection lately?
2. Are you getting hard during intercourse?
3. Are you having erections when you wake up?
4. Any problems with getting hard during masturbation?
Questions about orgasm
1. Do you have any difficulties reaching orgasm?
2. Do you need additional stimulation to reach orgasm/to ejaculate?
3. Do you reach orgasm every time when having sexual intercourse?
4. Does it take you too long to reach orgasm?
Additional questions may ask about masturbation, sexual abuse, sexual orientation, sex
outside the permanent relationship etc.
420 R. Balon
3. SEXUAL DYSFUNCTIONS
Sexual dysfunctions in the DSM classification system are divided into
sexual desire disorders (hypoactive sexual desire disorder and sexual
aversion disorder), sexual arousal disorders (female sexual arousal disor-
der and male erectile disorder), orgasmic disorders (female orgasmic
disorder, male orgasmic disorder, and premature ejaculation), sexual pain
disorders (dyspareunia and vaginismus), sexual dysfunction due to vari-
ous general medical conditions (e.g. diabetes mellitus), substance-induced
sexual dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction not otherwise specified. Hyper
sexuality is not classified as a sexual dysfunction in the current DSM
diagnostic system because it is not clearly conceptualized and defined.
However, the ICD classification includes the diagnosis of excessive sexual
drive, and hyper sexuality disorder is being considered for the next edition
of the DSM.
According to the DSM-IV classification, all primary sexual dysfunc-
tions have specific subtypes. These subtypes may be used to help to delin-
eate the nature of the onset, context of sexual dysfunction, and possible
etiology. The lifelong subtype indicates whether the sexual dysfunction
has been present since the onset of sexual functioning; the acquired
subtype indicates whether the dysfunction developed only after a period
of normal functioning. The situational and generalized subtypes indicate
whether the sexual dysfunction is or is not limited to certain types of
stimulation, situations, or partners (in some cases it may be appropriate to
mention whether the dysfunction occurs during masturbation). Finally, the
“due to psychological factors” subtype is used when psychological factors
are judged to have a major role in the onset and the severity, exacerbation,
or maintenance of the dysfunction and general medical conditions and
substances play no role in the etiology of dysfunction. The “due to
combined factors” subtype is used when both psychological factors and a
general medical condition or a substance have a role in the etiology but
the general medical condition or the substance’s contribution is not
sufficient to account for the dysfunction. If a general medical condition or
substance use is sufficient to account for the dysfunction, the diagnoses of
sexual dysfunction due to general medical condition or substance-induced
sexual dysfunction are used.
422 R. Balon
424 R. Balon
426 R. Balon
out, a rubber band laced at the base of the erected penis, and the tube
removed) are safe but cumbersome to use.
Second line treatments include intraurethral alprostadil and intracaver-
nosal injections of alprostadil and various other substances.
Third line treatment may also involve vacuum erectile devices but
usually means much more invasive approaches, such as penile prosthesis
and microvascular surgery of the penis.
428 R. Balon
430 R. Balon
4. PARAPHILIAS
The diagnostic criteria of paraphilias are descriptive and also a bit vague
and arbitrary. The reliability of the diagnostic criteria is not well studied
and thus is unknown. There are three basic types of paraphilias: those
involving non-human objects, those involving suffering of oneself or
one’s partner, and those involving children or other non-consenting per-
sons. One should realize that there are cultural aspects of paraphilias and
that there are cultural underpinnings of the efforts to define normal and
abnormal sexual behavior. The concept of what is and what is not accept-
able sexual behavior has also been changing through history. Paraphilias
are difficult to study because they are rare and socially not acceptable
(thus help is rarely sought).
The differential diagnosis of paraphilias includes other paraphilias;
non-pathological use of sexual fantasies, behaviors, or objects as a stimu-
lus for sexual excitement;2 mental retardation; dementia; personality
changes due to a general medical condition; substance abuse; manic
episode; and schizophrenia.
The course of paraphilias is usually chronic. Some fantasies and
behaviors may begin in childhood or adolescence and some may diminish
with advancing age. Paraphilic behavior may increase in response to
stress.2 Some paraphilias are relatively harmless (fetishism), and some
have serious consequences (pedophilia).
Newer issues, not fully addressed by psychiatry and medicine, include
online sexual offending (especially the child pornography trade) and
increase of sexual deviances in females. This section will review the
diagnostic criteria of individual paraphilias. The treatment of all para-
philias will be discussed together, because there are many similarities in
treatment recommendations (and scarce evidence).
432 R. Balon
4.1.1. Exhibitionism
Essential diagnostic criteria of exhibitionism are, over a period of at least
six months, recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges,
or behaviors involving the exposure of one’s genitals to an unsuspecting
stranger. Exhibitionism should be distinguished from public urination and
nudism.
4.1.2. Fetishism
Essential diagnostic criteria of fetishism are, over a period of at least six
months, recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or
behaviors involving the use of non-living objects (e.g. female undergar-
ments). The fetish objects are not limited to articles of female clothing
used in cross-dressing (as in Transvestic Fetishism) or devices designed
for the purpose of tactile genital stimulation (e.g. vibrator); however,
fetishism is usually ego syntonic and rarely causes distress (in contrast to
the DSM diagnostic criteria).
4.1.3. Frotteurism
Essential diagnostic criteria of frotteurism are, over a period of at least six
months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or
behaviors involving touching and rubbing against a non-consenting person.
4.1.4. Pedophilia
Essential diagnostic criteria of pedophilia are, over a period of at least six
months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or
behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children
(generally age 13 or younger). The person also is at least age 16 years and
at least five years older than the child or children. (Individuals in late
adolescence involved in an on-going sexual relationship with a 12- or
13-year-old should not be included).
The diagnostic description of pedophilia should also specify whether
the individual is sexually attracted to males, females or both; whether the
4.1.8. Voyeurism
The essential diagnostic criteria of voyerism are, over a period of at least
six months, recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges,
or behaviors involving the act of observing an unsuspecting person who is
naked, in the process of disrobing, or engaging in sexual activity.
434 R. Balon
436 R. Balon
(1) Repeated stated desire to be, or insistence that he or she is, the other
sex.
(2) In boys, preference for cross-dressing or stimulating female attire; in
girls, insistence on wearing only stereotypical masculine clothing.
(3) Strong and persistent preference for cross-sex roles in make-believe
play or persistent fantasies of being the other sex.
(4) Intense desire to participate in the stereotypical games and pastimes
of the other sex.
(5) Strong preference for playmates of the other sex.
438 R. Balon
6. CONCLUSION
Sexual disorders are unique in being at the intersection of many
disciplines — psychiatry, psychology, biology, sexology, urology, obstet-
rics, gynecology, and others. Unfortunately, sexual disorders, especially
paraphilias, have not been well studied. Sexual functioning can be pro-
foundly influenced by various biological, psychological, interpersonal,
cultural, religious, and other factors. The diagnostic classification of sex-
ual disorders is undergoing important changes. The etiology of sexual
disorders is mostly unknown. There have been tremendous developments
in the pharmacological management of some sexual disorders, such as
male erectile disorder, premature ejaculation, and paraphilias. Good clini-
cal management of sexual disorders requires a multidisciplinary approach,
usually combining pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy and, at times,
other management approaches.
7. KEY POINTS
• Sexual dysfunctions are fairly frequent in the general population.
Their incidence increases with age and with comorbid mental and/or
physical illness.
• Sexual dysfunctions are associated with the use of various medica-
tions such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antihypertensives
and also with some substances of abuse.
• There have been important developments in the area of “sexual phar-
macology” — efficacious medications are available for male erectile
disorder and for premature ejaculation.
• Sexual desire impairment may be amenable to administration of
bupropion or, in the case of hypogonadism, testosterone.
• There are no efficacious medications available for orgasmic disorders
and sexual pain disorders.
8. SELF-ASSESSMENT
8.1. Which of the following sexual disorders is not classified as
paraphilia?
(A) Exhibitionism.
(B) Fetishism.
(C) Vaginismus.
(D) Voyeurism.
Two small studies (e.g. Segraves et al.19) suggest the usefulness of bupro-
pion in female hypoactive sexual desire disorder. There are no solid phar-
macotherapy studies of exhibitionism, masochism, and gender identity
disorder. Treatment of premature ejaculation may include some SSRIs
(e.g. fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline)
Answer: B
440 R. Balon
9. CASE STUDIES
9.1. Female hypoactive sexual desire disorder
A 40-year-old woman was evaluated for chronic depression, social with-
drawal, and lack of energy. She reported some difficulties in social situa-
tions and low interest in pleasurable activities, including sex. She was
started on citalopram 20 mg/day. At her return visit three weeks later, she
reported improved mood; however, she complained that she had a com-
plete lack of sexual desire and that it took her “forever, if at all” to reach
orgasm. Because citalopram was suspected as the agent causing the lack
of libido and delayed orgasm, it was discontinued, and she was started on
bupropion 150 mg/day. About a month later, she reported improved mood
and energy and also increased libido. Her orgasmic capacity returned to
her usual level.
9.3. Exhibitionism
A 25-year-old man was arrested by the police and referred for treatment.
After ordering food, he drove to a restaurant’s drive-through window, and
when the female employee was handing him his order, he opened his coat
and flashed his naked body and genitals at her. When she started to
scream, he quickly drove away. However, the woman was able to catch his
license plate number in the mirror at the drive-through window and called
the police, who arrested him within minutes. During his evaluation, he
admitted flashing his genitals at several unsuspecting women with
subsequent masturbation. He stated that he had not been able to date and
that he had been a bit depressed over it. He responded well to individual
therapy and paroxetine.
REFERENCES
1. Abel GG, Huffman J, Warberg B, Holland CL. (1998) Visual reaction time
and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sex
Abuse 10: 81–95.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington,
D.C.
3. Balon R. (2007) Sexual dysfunctions. In: Gabbard GO (ed.), Gabbard’s
Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th ed. Chapter 42, pp. 641–655,
American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
4. Billups KL, Berman J, Berman L, Metz ME, Glennon ME, Goldstein I.
(2001) A new nonpharmacological vacuum therapy for female sexual
dysfunction. J Sex Marital Ther 27: 435–441.
5. Clayton AH, McGravey EL, Clavet GJ, Piazza L. (1997) Comparison of
sexual functioning in clinical and nonclinical populations using the Changes
of Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ). Psychopharmacol Bull 33:
747–753.
6. Derogatis LR, Balon R. (2009) Clinical evaluation of sexual dysfunctions.
In: Balon R, Segraves RT (eds.), Clinical Manual of Sexual Disorders,
Chapter 2, pp. 23–57, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA.
7. Derogatis LR. (1997) The Derogatis interview for sexual functioning (DISF/
DISF-SR): An introductory report. J Sex Marital Ther 23: 291–304.
8. Fagan PJ. (2004) Sexual Disorders: Perspectives on Diagnosis and Treatment.
Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
9. Freund K, Blanchard R. (1986) The concept of courtship theory. J Sex
Marital Ther 12: 79–92.
10. Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, Gingell C, Moreira E,
Want T, for the GSSAB Investigators’ Group. (2005) Sexual problems among
women and men aged 40–80y: Prevalence and correlates identified in the
global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Int J Impot Res 17: 39–57.
442 R. Balon
11. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. (1999) Sexual dysfunction in the United
States. Prevalence and predictors. JAMA 281: 537–544.
12. Masters WH, Johnson V. (1966) Human Sexual Response, Little Brown,
Boston, MA.
13. McGahuey CA, Gelenberg AJ, Laukes CA, Moreno FA, Delgado PL,
McKnight KM, Manber R. (2000) The Arizona sexual experience scale
(ASEX): Reliability and validity. J Sex Marital Ther 26: 25–40.
14. Pukall CF, Payne KA, Kao A, Khalife S, Binik YM. (2005) Dyspareunia.
In: Balon R, Segraves RT (eds.), Handbook of Sexual Dysfunction, Chapter
1, pp. 249–272, Taylor & Francis, NY.
15. Osborne CS, Wise TN. (2005) Paraphilia. In: Balon R, Segraves RT (eds),
Handbook of Sexual Dysfunction, Chapter 12, pp. 293–330, Taylor &
Francis, NY.
16. Quirk FH, Heiman J, Rosen RC, Laan E, Smith MD, Boolell M. (2002)
Development of a sexual function questionnaire for clinical trials of female
sexual function. J Womens Health Gender Based Med 11: 277–285.
17. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osteloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. (1997)
The international index of erectile function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale
for assessment of sexual dysfunction. Urology 49: 822–830.
18. Segraves RT, Balon R. (2003) Sexual Pharmacology: Fast Facts, WW Norton,
NY.
19. Segraves RT, Clayton A, Croft H, Wolf A, Warnock J. (2004) Bupropion
sustained release for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in
premenopausal women. J Clin Psychopharmacol 24: 339–342.
20. World Health Organization. (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and
Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Description and Diagnostic Guidelines.
World Health Organization, Geneva.
Chapter 18
Adjustment Disorder
1. INTRODUCTION
Stressful life events, even if brief, may influence one’s health. These
events may even lead to psychopathological alterations. ICD-10 classifi-
cation divides disorders that are strongly related to stressful life events
into two main categories: post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and
adjustment disorder. The former comes as a consequence of life-events
such as life-threatening menaces, injury menaces, or great physical or
psychological distress. The latter are conditions of subjective and emo-
tional distress triggered as consequences of a meaningful change in life.
2. EPIDEMIOLOGY
2.1. Prevalence
The only large epidemiological survey which included adjustment disor-
der is the Outcome of Depression International Network (ODIN) pro-
ject,11 which investigated depressive disorders in five European countries.
By using a two-step screening method, researchers quite surprisingly
diagnosed adjustment disorder in less than 1% of population affected by
a depressive-like disorder. The low prevalence of adjustment disorder
may be due to the exclusion of patients with adjustment disorder as a
443
2.2. Outcome
In the definition of adjustment disorder, there is an expectation of a good
outcome after the removal of the precipitating stressor. Follow-up studies
of subjects with adjustment disorder showed that after five years only
13%–17% had a diagnosis of MDD and/or alcoholism, and 8% met the
criteria for antisocial personality disorder.1,3
By studying consecutive patients in a hospital emergency department
during the first six months after a serious accident, Kuhn et al.19 found an
incidence of adjustment disorder of 1.5%. Six months after the accident,
10% of the subjects met criteria for MDD, 6% for PTSD, 4% for subsyn-
dromal PTSD, and 1.5% for specific phobia.
Greenberg et al.16 studied the outcome of inpatients who were given a
diagnosis of adjustment disorder at admission in hospitals. Adolescents
and adults with adjustment disorder had a significantly shorter index of
hospitalizations and more suicidality than the comparison subjects. Two
years after discharge, as compared with control subjects, adults — but not
adolescents — with adjustment disorder had significantly fewer psychiat-
ric re-admissions, fewer re-hospitalization days, and higher rates of
comorbid substance use disorder. A careful observation during hospitali-
zation caused about 40% of the patients admitted with the diagnosis of
adjustment disorder being discharged with different diagnoses. Only 18%
of the inpatients with adjustment disorder who were hospitalized were
diagnosed as such at re-admission.
3. ETIOLOGY
Stressors causing adjustment disorder may be of different types and
different weights. Individual reactions to stressors may be influenced
by individual variables (e.g. age, gender), health variables, factors
related to instruction, ethics, political and religious beliefs, and other
factors. Other variables may be found within the family environment:
the presence or absence of an affective support, the relational strength,
the economic status. It has been also reported that biological markers —
such as regional brain metabolic changes at 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose
positron emission tomography (18-F-FDG PET) can identify sub-
jects with adjustment disorder, because they are present in cancer
patients who later develop MDD or adjustment disorder, while cancer
patients who do not show such changes do not develop psychiatric
disorders.20
Brown and Harris4 introduced the concept of subjectivity in stress
evaluation, which means that the same event (e.g. the death of a pet)
may be traumatic for one person and not relevant for another person.
The research into personal predisposition to a depressive reaction to
stress and into attachment style during childhood suggests that these
factors may influence stress vulnerability. Mildly depressed individuals
who report a dismissing attachment style (higher levels of avoidant
attachment and lower levels of anxious attachment) or preoccupied style
(lower levels of avoidant attachment and higher levels of anxious attach-
ment) experience higher levels of stress associated with sociotropic
events. These effects are not present among more severely depressed
patients.
Troisi et al.28 reported alexithymic traits more pronounced in patients
with adjustment disorder who had patterns of insecure attachment and
who reported more severe symptoms of separation anxiety during
childhood, independently of the severity of their current anxiety and
depressive symptoms. These data imply a role for early developmental
factors in the etiology of alexithymia and suggest that alexithymia may
be associated with insecure attachment when adjustment disorder
occurs.
Another line of research regards the concept of sensitization. Some find-
ings show that in non-melancholic depressed patients, severe stressful life
events are more likely to occur before the first depressive episode rather
than after subsequent ones. This suggests an enhanced sensitization of
depressed patients to subsequent episodes of non-melancholic depression.
Finally, a few studies on military personnel showed that solders with
higher neuroticism, lower extroversion, separation anxiety symptoms,
maternal overprotection, and parental abuse style have an increased risk
of suffering from adjustment disorder.12,14
4. DIAGNOSIS
The main problems with the diagnosis of adjustment disorder are its insta-
bility and its vague boundaries with depression and PTSD from one side
and with normal reactions to stress from the other side.
In fact, clinicians run the risk to start unnecessary drug treatments
or, on the contrary, to consider the emotional response as an inevitable
consequence of the illness. To contrast this risk, clinicians should avoid
Table 1. Diagnostic criteria for adjustment disorder according with the WHO International
Classification of Diseases (ICD-10).
States of subjective distress and emotional disturbance, usually interfering with social
functioning and performance, arising in the period of adaptation to a significant life change
or a stressful life event. The stressor may have affected the integrity of an individual’s
social network (bereavement, separation experiences) or the wider system of social
supports and values (migration, refugee status), or represented a major developmental
transition or crisis (going to school, becoming a parent, failure to attain a cherished
personal goal, retirement).
Individual predisposition or vulnerability plays an important role in the risk of
occurrence and the shaping of the manifestations of adjustment disorders, but it is
nevertheless assumed that the condition would not have arisen without the stressor.
The manifestations vary and include depressed mood, anxiety or worry (or mixture of
these), a feeling of inability to cope, plan ahead, or continue in the present situation, as
well as some degree of disability in the performance of daily routine. Conduct disorders
may be an associated feature, particularly in adolescents. The predominant feature may be
a brief or prolonged depressive reaction, or a disturbance of other emotions and conduct.
Includes: –Culture shock
–Grief reaction
–Hospitalisation in children
F43.20 Brief depressive reaction. A transient mild depressive state of a duration not
exceeding one month.
F43.21 Prolonged depressive reaction. A mild depressive state occurring in response to
a prolonged exposure to a stressful situation but of a duration not exceeding two
years.
F43.22 Mixed anxiety and depressive reaction. Both anxiety and depressive symptoms
are prominent, but at levels no greater than specified in mixed anxiety and
depressive disorder (F41.2) or other mixed anxiety disorders (F41.3).
F43.23 With predominant disturbance of other emotions. The symptoms are usually of
several types of emotion, such as anxiety, depression, worry, tensions, and anger.
Symptoms of anxiety and depression may meet the criteria for mixed anxiety and
depressive disorder (F41.2) or other mixed anxiety disorders (F41.3), but they are
not so predominant that other more specific depressive or anxiety disorders can
be diagnosed. This category should also be used for reactions in children in
which regressive behavior such as bedwetting or thumb-sucking are also present.
F43.24 With predominant disturbance of conduct. The main disturbance is one involving
conduct, e.g. an adolescent grief reaction resulting in aggressive or dissocial
behavior.
F43.25 With mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. Both emotional symptoms and
disturbances of conduct are prominent features.
F43.28 With other specified predominant symptoms.
adjustment disorder by the use of a new tool, the CFlex (Coping Flexibility
Scale for Cancer), but he could not succeed in developing a specific scale.
This may be because of problems with the scale or for the heterogeneous
nature of the adjustment disorder category.
The difficulties in differentiating between adjustment disorder and
major depressive disorder were underscored by Malt et al.,21 who
examined the diagnostic reliability among the components of the
European Consultation Liaison Workgroup. The study design required
that each consultant had to complete a training program for reliable use of
the ICD-10. Even if 76% of consultants reached a high reliability rate
(kappa of at least 0.70), the study underlined some problems in the
differentiation between adjustment disorder and depressive disorders.
5. TREATMENTS
The fact that episodes of adjustment disorder are short-lived and that
patients recover with the passage of time may explain the paucity of stud-
ies, especially randomized controlled trials, on the therapy of these disor-
ders. This no longer justifies the idea that no specific intervention is
required unless the individual is acutely suicidal.
It is a shared opinion that currently psychotherapy remains the treat-
ment of choice for adjustment disorder, while we lack major pharmaco-
therapy studies to support antidepressant treatment.9 Unfortunately,
psychotherapy is not always viable, because adjustment disorder is often
diagnosed in the primary care setting. Moreover, the problem of which
psychotherapy may be useful in adjustment disorder cannot find a certain
answer. The clinical characteristics of adjustment disorder (a short-term
difficulty, related to a stressor, that rarely goes beyond six months) suggest
a solution-focused therapy, like interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) or
problem solving therapy, that helps the individual to deal more effectively
with the specific life problem. A study on adolescents with major depres-
sion or other depressive disorders (among them adjustment disorder)
showed that psychosocial functioning improved in all subjects, whether
their treatment involved only psychotherapeutic treatments or additional
psychotropic medication.23
Unfortunately, data on efficacy of brief psychotherapies in adjustment
disorder are scarce.6 IPT was found to be effective in HIV-positive
6. CONCLUSION
Adjustment disorder is a very common diagnosis in clinical practice, but
we still lack data about its rightful clinical entity. This may be caused by
a difficulty in facing, with purely descriptive methods, a “pathogenic
label,” based on a stressful event, to which a subjective impact has to be
considered. We lack efficacy data concerning treatment of adjustment
disorders. The use of psychotropic drugs such as antidepressants, in
adjustment disorder with anxious or depressed mood is not properly
founded and should be avoided in less severe forms of this disorder. More
solid evidence has been produced about the usefulness of psychothera-
pies. Data from randomized-controlled trials would be particularly inter-
esting, also in resistant forms, even with combined use of drugs and
psychotherapies.
7. KEY POINTS
• A mood disturbance must be investigated for previous episodes of
depression or hypomania, in order to assign a correct diagnosis.
• The diagnosis remains essentially clinical and not statistical, that is,
the treatment must be guided more by a clinical evaluation of the
8. SELF-ASSESSMENT
8.1. The onset of an adjustment disorder is usually
(A) Independent from the occurrence of a stressful event or life change.
(B) Within a few days of the occurrence of a stressful event or life change.
(C) Within one month of the occurrence of a stressful event or life change.
(D) Within three months of the occurrence of a stressful event or life
change.
(E) Within six months of the occurrence of a stressful event or life change.
9. CASE STUDIES
9.1. Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and conduct
disturbances
A 59-year-old transportation businessman, married to a secretary at the
company where he works, started to have financial problems. As a conse-
quence of increasing worrying, he demonstrated some administrative
irregularities, which alerted his wife and caused some arguments between
the two spouses.
Three weeks later he began to show irritability, psychomotor agitation,
disruption of his sleep–wake cycle, hopelessness, emotional lability, and
mood disturbances. His general practitioner referred him to psychiatry
after a severe aggressive episode with menace with a handgun against
his wife.
His premorbid character was reflexive and calm, with no history of
psychiatric disorders. Physical examination revealed normal vital signs
and a normal heart, lungs, and abdomen. The laboratory evaluation and
EGC were normal. Mental status evaluation revealed impaired attention
and concentration, without language, perception, or ideative disorders.
The patient received a diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed
anxiety and conduct disturbances and was prescribed escitalopram and
lorazepam at night.
Over the next few weeks, his symptoms resolved and he returned to his
previous level of functioning.
REFERENCES
1. Andreasen NC, Hoenk PR. (1982) The predictive value of adjustment disor-
ders: A follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry 139: 584–590.
2. Balestrieri M, Isola M, Quartaroli M, Roncolato M, Bellantuono C. (2010)
Assessing mixed anxiety-depressive disorder. A national primary care sur-
vey. Psychiatry Res 176: 197–201.
3. Bronish T. (1991) Adjustment reactions: A long term prospective and retro-
spective follow-up of former patients in a crisis intervention ward. Acta
Psychiatr Scand 84: 86–93.
4. Brown GW, Harris TO. (1978) Social Origins of Depression: A Study of
Psychiatric Disorder in Women, Free Press, NY.
5. Carta MG, Altamura AC, Hardoy MC, Pinna F, Medda S, Dell’Osso L,
Carpiniello B, Angst J. (2003) Is recurrent brief depression an expression of
Chapter 19
Personality Disorders
Joel Paris
1. INTRODUCTION
Everyone has a personality. It can be difficult to determine a boundary of
dysfunction that would define a personality disorder. By and large, the
threshold for diagnosing a personality disorder should be kept high.
Diagnosis requires clinically significant (i.e. seriously problematic)
dysfunction in work and/or relationships. Using current criteria, research
shows that patients with personality disorder are often disabled on a
similar level as those with most chronic mental disorders.18
Personality disorders usually present clinically with maladaptive and
problematic interpersonal relationships. Many of the problems seen in
personality disorders are “ego-syntonic,” in that patients view the outside
world and other people (rather than themselves) as the problem. But many
patients have symptomatic features not seen in community populations.
Examples include the chronic criminality associated with dissocial
personality disorder and the repeated suicidal behaviors associated with
borderline personality disorder. Thus personality disorders are not just
normal variants but are disorders with definite consequences for an ability
to establish stable intimacy and/or a satisfying occupation.
Personality disorders have an important cultural context. Although
personality traits are universal, their frequency varies somewhat from one
society to another. For example, one has to be careful not to interpret
the emotional expressiveness that is encouraged in some cultures, or the
461
462 J. Paris
Table 1. ICD-10 general criteria for a personality disorder (World Health Organization,
1993).
The diagnosis of a personality disorder must satisfy the following general criteria, in addition
to the specific criteria listed under the specific personality disorder under consideration:
1. There is evidence that the individual’s characteristic and enduring patterns of inner
experience and behavior as a whole deviate markedly from the culturally expected and
accepted range (or “norm”). Such deviation must be manifested in more than one of the
following areas:
i. cognition (i.e. ways of perceiving and interpreting things, people, and events;
forming attitudes and images of self and others);
ii. affectivity (range, intensity, and appropriateness of emotional arousal and response);
iii. control over impulses and gratification of needs;
iv. manner of relating to others and of handling interpersonal situations.
2. The deviation must manifest itself pervasively as behavior that is inflexible, maladaptive,
or otherwise dysfunctional across a broad range of personal and social situations
(i.e. not being limited to one specific “triggering” stimulus or situation).
3. There is personal distress, or adverse impact on the social environment, or both, clearly
attributable to the behavior referred to in criterion 2.
4. There must be evidence that the deviation is stable and of long duration, having its onset
in late childhood or adolescence.
5. The deviation cannot be explained as a manifestation or consequence of other adult
mental disorders, although episodic or chronic conditions may coexist with, or be
superimposed upon, the deviation. Organic brain disease, injury, or dysfunction must
be excluded as the possible cause of the deviation.
464 J. Paris
466 J. Paris
personality disorder accounts for nearly a third of cases, and most cases
are male.10
468 J. Paris
Impulsive type
At least three of the following must be present, one of which must be:
Borderline type
At least three of the symptoms mentioned in F60.30 Impulsive type must be present, with
at least two of the following in addition:
1. disturbances in and uncertainty about self-image, aims, and internal preferences
(including sexual).
2. liability to become involved in intense and unstable relationships, often leading to
emotional crisis.
3. excessive efforts to avoid abandonment.
4. recurrent threats or acts of self-harm.
5. chronic feelings of emptiness.
470 J. Paris
The histrionic category (Table 10) has a long clinical tradition and
reflects problematic traits that psychotherapists see in practice, but it has
not been the subject of research.
7. TREATMENT
Treatment of personality disorders should be seen in light of their unique
course. By definition, personality disorders start early in life and, once
they emerge, continue to produce dysfunction for years. However, it does
not follow that personality disorders rarely remit or improve. On the con-
trary, large-scale prospective research has shown that most patients remit
symptomatically within a few years, even though improvement in func-
tional impairment is more sluggish.18 Even in antisocial personality disor-
der, patients are less likely to be involved with the law as they age.2
Recovery is particularly striking in borderline personality disorder.13
These patients may be suicidal for years, but only a minority die by their
own hand. By the age of 50 years, most find a niche in society and are no
longer in contact with the mental health system.
A diagnosis of personality disorder can help guide management. For
example, there is no evidence that patients with dissocial personality
disorder benefit from psychological or pharmacological treatment. In con-
trast, there is a large body of evidence that patients with borderline
personality disorder can benefit from mental health interventions.
However, extensive research on the treatment of borderline personality
disorder suggests that pharmacotherapy has only weak evidence for effec-
tiveness, while specific forms of psychotherapy have been more
successful.16 Unfortunately, these findings have not prevented physicians
from prescribing patients a wide variety of pharmacological treatments,
while access to evidence-based psychotherapy remains limited.
Some comorbid diagnoses affect treatment. Although patients with
personality disorders are often depressed, they do not greatly benefit from
antidepressants, and they sometimes have severe substance abuse that has
to be managed first.
The strongest evidence base in borderline personality disorder concerns
the effectiveness of dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), and there is also
fairly good evidence for mentalization-based therapy (MBT).17 Both
methods use primarily cognitive methods that help patients to overcome
affective instability and impulsivity.
Unfortunately, evidence-based psychological treatment is resource-
intensive and not widely available. Access to psychotherapists with
472 J. Paris
9. KEY POINTS
• Personality disorders are defined by problems in behavior, emotion,
and thinking patterns that begin early in life and that lead to dysfunc-
tion over many years in many contexts. Personality disorders are not
episodic conditions, but enduring patterns.
• To make a diagnosis of personality disorder, one should first deter-
mine that overall criteria are met and then see if the patient fits a
specific category.
• Individuals with dissocial personality disorder are commonly found in
the prison system or in the community living off petty crime. These
patients may only appear in the mental health system when advised to
do so by a third party. Recognizing the clinical picture is important
because it guides clinicians to avoid offering interventions to patients
who lack sufficient motivation for change.
• Borderline personality disorder is very commonly seen in emergency
settings, psychiatric clinics, and primary care. The chronic suicidality
and emotional instability that characterize the disorder present unique
clinical challenges. Most patients get better with time, and no more
than 10% will kill themselves.
• Although clinical trials of antidepressants, neuroleptics, and mood
stabilizers show some symptomatic benefit, one never sees full remis-
sion, and even though personality disorders are often comorbid with
depression, antidepressants are much less effective in these patients.
• Clinical trials show that psychological treatment specifically adapted to
borderline personality disorder is effective, most particularly DBT and
MBT. Successful therapies for borderline personality disorder are designed
to combat affective instability and impulsivity by teaching skills in self-
observation and emotion regulation.
10. SELF-ASSESSMENT
10.1. The following are defining criteria for dissocial
personality disorder, except for
(A) Callousness.
(B) Self-harm.
474 J. Paris
476 J. Paris
He also had a long history of alcohol and cocaine abuse. His parents, now
estranged, had been unable to control him. There was always a woman in
his life, but he never stayed with anyone for long. He had never held a job
for more than few months.
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington,
DC.
2. Black DW, Baumgard CH, Bell SE. (1995) A 16–45 year follow-up of 71
men with antisocial personality disorder. Compr Psychiatry 36: 130–140.
3. Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Newman DL, Silva PA. (1996) Behavioral observations
at age three predict adult psychiatric disorders: Longitudinal evidence from
a birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53: 1033–1039.
4. Coid J, Yang M, Tyrer P, Roberts A, Ullrich S. (2006) Prevalence and corre-
lates of personality disorder in Great Britain. Br J Psychiatry 188: 423–431.
5. Huang Y, Kotov R, de Girolamo G, Preti A, Angermeyer M, Benjet C,
Demyttenaere K, Graaf R, Gureje O, Nasser Karam A, Lee S, Lépine JP,
Matschinger H, Posada-Villa J, Suliman S, Vilagut S, Kessler RC. (2009)
DSM–IV personality disorders in the WHO world mental health surveys. Br
J Psychiatry 195: 46–53 .
6. Hwu HG, Yeh EK, Change LY. (1989) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in
Taiwan defined by the Chinese diagnostic interview schedule. Acta Psychiatr
Scand 79: 136–147.
7. Kendler KS, Aggen SH, Czjaikowski N, Roysamb E, Tambs K, Torgersen S,
Neale MC, Reichborn-Kjennerud T. (2008) The structure of genetic and
environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders. A multivariate
twin study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 1438–1446.
8. Lenzenweger MF, Lane MC, Loranger AW, Kessler RC. (2007) DSM-IV
personality disorders in the National Comorbidity/Survey Replication. Biol
Psychiatry 62: 553–564.
9. DSM-IV Personality Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey
Replication. (2007) Biol Psychiatry 62: 553–556.
10. McGirr A, Paris J, Lesage A, Renaud J, Turecki G. (2007) Risk factors for
suicide completion in borderline personality disorder: A case-control study of
cluster B comorbidity and impulsive aggression. J Clin Psychiatry 68: 721–729.
Chapter 20
Geriatrics
Randall Espinoza
1. INTRODUCTION
The world is aging. Advances in control of childhood deaths and improve-
ments in public health, especially in developing countries, coupled with
drops in fertility and increases in life expectancy have led to a gradual
aging of the global population. Sometime within the next decade, and for
the first time in history, there will be more people older than age 65 years
than there are children younger than five years of age. As shown on the
map (Fig. 1), these increases in the geriatric population are occurring all
over the world but most rapidly in Europe and Japan, followed by North
America, Australia, and New Zealand.4 Developing countries, however,
are also experiencing a rise in older inhabitants. Although currently only
5% of their residents, by 2050 the percent of older persons will more than
triple, to 18% in Asia and to 19% in Latin America, and while smaller, the
rise in Africa will more than double from 3% today to 7% in just 40 years.22
The field of medicine concerned with the mental health care and treat-
ment of the older person is geriatric psychiatry. The assessment and man-
agement of psychiatric disorders in later life is grounded on the principles
of geriatrics, which recognizes that older persons have unique life histo-
ries, must be treated with respect and dignity, and have needs that should
be coordinated across multiple providers and domains of care.1,3
Additionally, because aging is not synonymous with disease, psychiatric
478
Geriatrics 479
480 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 481
482 R. Espinoza
800,000
thousands)
Number
600,000
(in
400,000
200,000
0
1980 1995 2030 2050
Year
age 65 are even more remarkable. Between 1900 and 1960, life expec-
tancy at age 65 increased by 2.4 years, but since 1960, life expectancy
increased by 3.4 years, or by 140% in less than 40 years. Greater changes
in the percentage of the older population are also noted in many European
countries and Japan.
Generally, gender differences internationally show that women outlive
men, and this difference begins in middle age and is most pronounced
after age 80. For example, in the US women maintain a slight advantage
in life expectancy earlier in life, but by the age of 50 the differences in life
expectancy begin to more noticeably diverge and rapidly accelerate in
the 8th and 9th decades of life, so that by age 85 or greater there are only
40 men for every 100 women. Much of the difference is due to higher
male mortality from heart disease, lung cancer, industrial and motor
vehicle accidents, and violence.
Geriatrics 483
illustrates that older persons are much more efficient than younger per-
sons at emotional control, resulting in improved memory performance
and efficiency. Thus, contrary to general cultural perceptions, growing
older confers some benefits, to wit, emotional and cognitive stability.
Further, the “well-being paradox” describes that, although adults over 65
face challenges to both brain and body, as we reach our 70s and 80s we
also harbor an abundance of social and emotional knowledge. Over time,
older adults, in general, acquire a greater sense of knowing right from
wrong, which enhances the ability to make more sound and dispassion-
ate decisions. This growth in wisdom may partially explain why older
age appears to correlate with greater happiness. Indeed, a recent study
found a U-shaped relationship between happiness and age. While we
begin life with very high levels of happiness, we reach a nadir in middle
age, but then experience a continuing rise through our 70s and into our
80s. This increase in happiness was true for both sexes. As shown in a
recent study, perception of stress over time also decreases. Stress is high-
est in adulthood, begins to drop in middle age, and continues to drop
through later life.
484 R. Espinoza
well-being, and positivity. The reasons for this positive outlook are only
recently being understood but include fundamental psychological pro-
cesses attributable to aging that are distinct from the ways of coping and
interpreting the world of our earlier years.
Notwithstanding, the elderly inevitably must face multiple changes and
losses that impact self-image and must also confront ideas of how they
function and live in the world. The main challenges confronted in later life
are shown in Table 2. An individual’s course through life is an interaction
between sociocultural biases and internal cumulative life experiences.
Thus, physiologic changes of aging are accompanied by transitions in
roles that an older person has in society, family, and work and by altera-
tions in interpersonal relationships. Western cultures are focused on
youth, athleticism, and vigor, so that society often diminishes the older
person. Perceived as useless, the elderly are not valued for their sagacity
and wisdom. Ageism is discrimination against a person on the basis of
age, which for the older individual means that negative attitudes and
stereotypes of aging are likely. Ageism permeates contemporary Western
culture, creating a constant barrage of negative views and depictions of
aging.
In contrast, in most developing countries and Asian societies, the
elderly are often revered and highly respected.10 A long view of life is
taken, and wisdom and experience are more readily incorporated in both
personal and broader social contexts such as politics, economics, and cul-
ture. The journey is valued and family history exalted. Extended families
Geriatrics 485
are often headed by a grandparent who can hold much sway over daily
decisions or long-term plans. Part of the reason for the difference in relat-
ing may lie in the way that death and dying are viewed. While dying and
death are avoided or delayed in Western society, in other parts of the world
these passages are seen as vital stages of the life cycle meant to be shared,
supported, and experienced among the living. Thus, when inevitable life
changes and decline do occur, the older person remains an integral part of
society until the end.
2.3.1. Retirement
Longevity has changed retirement patterns, and today an individual in the
developed world can expect to live one quarter or more of life in retire-
ment. Planning and preparation for retirement can facilitate a successful
transition to a new life stage, but a lack of such planning can create hard-
ships across generations. Beginning new hobbies and cultivating new
interests should not be left until retirement. Some elderly continue to work
as a source of enjoyment or of supplemental income, while many are
forced to retire or are subtly eased out of their careers. Retirement can
bring a focus on one’s health and financial status. Not all countries plan
financial support for their elderly population, however, and in many parts
of the world families must assume primary responsibility for the care and
housing of an older parent. Without a pension, many elderly are living in
or near poverty. Sadly, a financially safe and comfortable retirement may
not be an option for many. Mounting financial pressures leave low-income
elderly having to choose between medications, other essential medical
treatments, food, or shelter. Not surprisingly, a higher economic status at
retirement is associated with more positive health outcomes and more life
satisfaction.
Successful retirements are not totally dependent on health and financial
matters, however. Making creative use of time influences quality of life to
a great degree. There are many physiological and psychological benefits
that retirees gain from leisure activities and volunteer work. Leisure
activities such as gardening, dancing, and traveling bring a sense of fun
and entertainment. Membership in volunteer associations and volunteer
486 R. Espinoza
work allow the elderly to share their expertise and skills while continuing
to contribute to society. It has been estimated that 40% of the elderly per-
form volunteer work, with elderly women being more likely to volunteer
their time. Other types of volunteer work include tutoring, helping reli-
gious organizations, raising money for charities or for social and political
causes, handiwork, and assisting in an office or hospital. Helping others
in need provides a way of achieving and maintaining a sense of purpose,
which is essential to sustaining a positive sense of self.
Geriatrics 487
2.3.3. Institutionalization
The majority of those over the age of 65 do not live in nursing homes, and
according to the 2000 US Census Bureau, only 5% of elderly above age
65 do. However, the rates of admission to nursing homes go up with age;
for example, almost 50% of those elderly older than the age of 95 live in
nursing homes. Entering a nursing home has many ramifications. Families
and spouses often feel as though they have failed their loved one, and fam-
ily dynamic issues surrounding the decision for nursing home placement
can be difficult and painful. However, caregivers who attempt to provide
total care for their family members have high rates of morbidity and
mortality, as they often neglect their own health and succumb to stress.
The transition to a nursing home is difficult, but the care received in this
setting is usually more successful and less stressful for both patient and
family. The nursing home can never be the same as home, nor can the care
delivered be the same as that from a devoted family member. However,
488 R. Espinoza
now an entire cadre of nursing home staff provides the care formerly
delivered by one or two family members, which results in an enhanced
quality of life for all. Concerns about abuse, neglect, or exploitation by
nursing home personnel are real, but sometimes overblown. State and
federal regulations and guidelines help ensure the safety and quality of
care.
There are high rates of psychiatric disorders in nursing homes.
Although healthy community-dwelling elderly have lower rates of depres-
sion, between 25% and 50% of the elderly residing in nursing homes have
or will develop clinical depression. Nearly two thirds of elderly patients
in long-term care exhibit some element of dementia. One of the most dif-
ficult issues confronting any society is where the demented patient exhib-
iting problematic neurobehavioral symptoms should be placed. These
patients are not appropriate for acute adult psychiatric units, where they
are at risk of being abused or injured, yet they remain a danger to them-
selves and/or to others in a conventional nursing home. Currently, there
are not enough dedicated or locked dementia facilities capable of manag-
ing this growing population of often physically robust individuals who
require a safe and caring environment.
Finally, for terminally ill patients, hospices and palliative care pro-
grams are now increasingly available for use by patients and families to
help them through the final days, weeks, or months of life. These pro-
grams aim to maintain dignity and compassion in the experience of death
and in the dying process. In 2000, about 2.4 million Americans died but
only 600,000 received hospice care. About 80% of these patients were
over the age of 65. Hospice programs promote comprehensive and com-
passionate care in hopes of avoiding another acute but futile hospitaliza-
tion, another abrupt change of surroundings, introduction of new providers
who are not familiar with the patient and family, or additional traumatic
and stressful experiences.
2.3.4. Driving
Driving represents independence, freedom, and personal power in many soci-
eties but especially in the United States, where public transportation in most
cities is less developed than in parts of Europe or Asia. Curtailing or
Geriatrics 489
2.3.5. Sexuality
Physiological and psychological changes may affect sexuality in the later
stages of life. These changes occur in the context of societies that do not
promote or accept sexuality in the elderly, and sexual expression in later
years is either ignored or, more often, ridiculed. This bias is reflected in the
paucity of studies addressing sexuality in the elderly. Physiological changes
may make sex less spontaneous or carefree for the older person, but clearly,
the yearning for closeness, sexual pleasure, and sexual release continues to
be part of the life of an older person. Issues of love and intimacy, sexual
attractiveness, partner availability, safe-sex, homosexuality, and masturba-
tion remain important aspects of the daily lives of older people. Increasingly,
research in the area of human sexuality supports the notion of “use it or
lose it,” meaning that those who maintain active sex lives as they age can
expect to remain sexually active and to derive pleasure from sexual activity
into the latter stages of life. An unusual but possible concern is sexual
exploitation of the cognitively impaired individual in an institutional
setting. These problems are often not addressed or discussed, although
there is increasing evidence for their occurrence as more people become
cognitively impaired while remaining physically and sexually robust.
490 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 491
492 R. Espinoza
iv. Competency
Independence and the ability to make decisions are important and defining
characteristics of being an adult. Losing the ability to make decisions
about one’s health care, finances, and legal matters is a serious infringe-
ment of the basic rights of an adult individual. The task of assessing
whether to deny a person of his or her rights cannot be taken lightly.
Confusion surrounds the difference between the terms capacity and com-
petency, which are often used interchangeably, if imprecisely. Capacity
refers to the ability of an individual to make decisions about medical,
financial, or legal matters of estate or of person and is a conclusion
reached usually after a medical or clinical evaluation. Competency, on the
other hand, is usually a legal definition and reflects an adjudicated court
decision about the state of a person after a court or judge hears evidence
Geriatrics 493
494 R. Espinoza
formally appoints and charges another person with the responsibility and
authority to make all medical, financial, and/or legal decisions.
Standardized tools may help facilitate the evaluation of competency,
but these need to be used in conjunction with a thorough clinical evalua-
tion that entails a complete medical history, review of medications, physi-
cal and psychiatric evaluations, and laboratory tests. A diagnosis, if
established, may impact the determination of the decision-making ability
and guide further work-up. Finally, evaluation of family structure and
social network and, frequently, interviews of family members, caregivers,
and friends are necessary for a complete competency assessment.
v. Ethics and Elder Abuse
Related to the issue of competency is the ethical care of the older adult with
mental illness. As highlighted previously, the older person experiences a
double jeopardy due to ageism and stigma from mental illness. At times, an
older person may be infantilized, be treated in an undignified manner, or
lack access to appropriate care. Indeed, many studies show that older per-
sons are typically both under-treated and less intensely treated for similar
conditions of equal severity, thereby leading to avoidable distress. To
address these concerns, recently the World Psychiatric Association Section
on Old Age Psychiatry in 2009 issued a consensus statement on ethics and
capacity in older people with mental disorders.7 In this statement they note
values that should inform a care framework for this population. In particu-
lar, they note the importance of striving for independence and self-
determination where possible, of attending to safety and dignity, and of
enhancing care and treatment. Moreover, poverty and female sex may place
additional risks and obstacles, especially in underdeveloped, religiously-
conservative or male-dominated societies. Finally, from a public health
perspective, older age should not place a limitation on resource utilization,
just as resource shortage does not justify discrimination on the basis of age.
Elder abuse remains a hidden and unspoken problem and is perpetrated
by family, caregivers, and even professionals. The true scope of the prob-
lem is unknown because elder abuse is often underreported. Sadly, older
persons with mental illness are among the most vulnerable and are at high
risk of elder abuse. Forms of elder abuse are listed in Table 4. Most juris-
dictions have laws protecting the elderly and the mentally impaired.
Geriatrics 495
Sexual Sexual contact without consent; ranges from sexual acts to showing an
unwilling person pornography, and forcing a person to watch sex acts or
to undress
Healthcare Charging for care not provided; submitting false claims; fraudulent practice
496 R. Espinoza
can be extremely painful for the elderly. Having a strong social network
of close and valued relationships with friends and family provides the best
means of coping with these losses. Early psychological treatment of com-
plicated bereavement may prevent the development of clinical depression.
Grief support groups available through pastoral counseling, hospice pro-
grams, or community organizations are helpful in providing or creating a
sense of security and of sharing and are sources for new relationships. The
role of spirituality and religion, for those who subscribe to these tenets
and hold these beliefs, cannot be underestimated as a source of comfort,
strength, and solace.
Geriatrics 497
parent in front of an authority figure, and they either may avoid making
any comments during the evaluation or may seek out separate or discreet
ways of conveying information in order to preserve the elder’s respect.
Lastly, some older persons may shun psychiatric evaluation due to the
stigma of mental illness or to a tendency to express psychological difficul-
ties as somatic complaints as a means to avoid the perception of character
flaws or weaknesses. In some cultures, emotional or behavioral problems
are handled not by a medical provider but by a local elder, spiritual healer,
or shaman. With the above in mind, a careful systematic and comprehen-
sive approach includes query for past medical and neurologic conditions,
review of medication and supplement lists, family medical and psychiatric
history, social history, and review of systems.
498 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 499
500 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 501
502 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 503
504 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 505
problem, either ask for the patient to adjust his or her hearing aids if these
are worn or speak directly in front of the patient in a clear and loud, but
not shouting, voice. Should others try to interject, respectfully ask that the
patient first be given a chance to respond and say that their input will be
sought out separately or later. The standard areas covering appearance,
behavior, mood, affect, speech, thought process, thought content, and
insight and judgment should be covered over the course of the meeting
and then detailed during the testing portion. In the appropriate clinical
situation, be sure to specifically ask about psychotic thinking or suicidal
ideation. The former can be easily overlooked and often is in the older
individual. The elderly have the highest suicide rates of any population;
thus, suicide is a serious concern in the older age group and should be
carefully investigated. However, some individuals may find direct ques-
tioning uncomfortable or embarrassing, especially in front of family
members, so starting from a general question, such as “Is life still worth
living?” may be a way to sensitively open the subject for further explora-
tion, after which the standard suicide assessment can follow.
Various psychopathology screens can also be deployed during the
interview, and numerous instruments exist, some of which have been
translated into several languages, such as the Geriatric Depression Scale.
Long and short versions of many of these scales are available for use in
different settings and by different providers. Although not replacing a
clinical interview, which remains the gold standard for diagnosing a
mental disorder, screening instruments can help quantify the degree of
impairment or severity of illness and may be used to follow change to
treatment.
The cognitive portion of the mental status examination is one of the
most essential components, but it is important to keep in mind that clinical
judgment should direct the extent of cognitive testing. Some patients who
show minimal cognitive difficulty during the interview may not merit
more than a few additional questions assessing their understanding of
general affairs, gross orientation, and judgment. As clinical suspicion
rises, additional cognitive screening tools of varying complexity may be
utilized. Additionally, it can be helpful to ask the informant to rate the
patient because the patient may have a lack of awareness of deficits or
denial of illness, or while patients may state a capability, in reality he or
506 R. Espinoza
she is not performing the activity regularly, if at all. Some of the most
commonly available screening tools and their characteristics are shown in
Table 7.
Ultimately, the cognitive screen is an aid to deciding if additional or
more formal neuropsychological testing is needed.17 The latter should be
reserved for patients with more pervasive cognitive deficits that are out of
proportion to what was expected, to help differentiate between a medical
or psychiatric etiology, to help in the differential diagnosis of an unusual
or atypical presentation, to better delineate the extent and pattern of cognitive
Geriatrics 507
deficits and then to follow for change or stabilization of deficits after treat-
ment, to provide medico–legal documentation, or to establish a cognitive
baseline. It is important to keep in mind that appropriate timing of testing
is essential in order to achieve the best use and interpretation of neuropsy-
chological assessment. When the patient’s current condition would pre-
vent obtaining reliable testing information, such as during a delirious
state, or when stabilization of a temporary condition unrelated to the test-
ing question has not yet occurred, formal testing is not indicated.
508 R. Espinoza
Condition
New onset
Lab test* Anxiety Psychosis AMS Mood disorder Illness
Routine
• Electrolytes x x x x x
• Calcium x x x x x
• Magnesium x x
• CBC x x x x x
• BUN/Cr x x x x x
• LFTs x x x x
• TSH x x x x x
• ESR x x x x x
• Urinalysis x x x x x
• Pulse Oximetry x x x x x
• EKG x x x x x
• CXR x x x x
• CT/MRI x x x x x
Special
• Toxicology x x x x x
• Drug levels x x x x x
• RPR x x x
• HIV x
• Ammonia x x x
*CBC: complete blood count; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; Cr: creatinine; LFTs: liver function tests;
TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EKG: electrocardiogram;
CXR: chest x-ray; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; RPR: rapid
plasmin reagin; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.
atypical. Patients with dementia are not immune from developing new
medical problems and should not receive substandard care. These patients
merit the same careful and thorough evaluation given their limited or
unreliable histories.
Geriatrics 509
510 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 511
512 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 513
514 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 515
516 R. Espinoza
Geriatrics 517
levels of alcohol and drugs and manifest toxic effects more readily, such
as confusion, disorientation, memory loss, poor motor coordination,
unsteady gait, and more falls. Chronic alcohol use is associated with poor
nutritional status and with vitamin and protein deficiencies, which may
lead to peripheral and central nervous system disorders like motor palsies,
neuropathies, Wernicke’s encephalopathy, or Korsakoff’s psychosis.
Finally, consequences of alcoholism and unsupervised or inappropriate
drug use are serious, leading possibly to early deaths. In the elderly, drug-
alcohol interactions and withdrawal syndromes from central nervous
system depressants can be lethal.
518 R. Espinoza
5. CONCLUSION
The older population is vast and heterogeneous, presenting a variety of
unmatched challenges, enormous complexity, and pressing needs within
limited resources. Soon in this coming decade, for the first time in history,
there will be more people in the world over the age of 65 than there are
younger than five years. The experience of aging across the globe varies
considerably, and psychological, sociocultural, and economic determi-
nants impact upon the quality of life in later years. Maintaining dignity,
respecting autonomy, and promoting self-determination, where culturally
and clinically indicated, are major goals in the care of the elderly, who are
particularly prone to ageism and stigmatization. Psychiatric disorders in
later life often must be evaluated in the context of on-going medical prob-
lems or complex social situations, so that comprehensive but judicious
care is warranted. Nonetheless, providing care for this population can be
a very intellectually satisfying and personally rewarding experience.
6. KEY POINTS
• Heterogeneity among individuals increases as they grow older, con-
tributing to unique life and medical histories and varied presentations
of illness.
• Aging is not synonymous with disease.
• Across the world, different cultures place different values on the lives
and care of the elderly.
• Common goals of healthy aging include optimizing function, enhanc-
ing quality of life, and remaining socially integrated in one’s home
and community.
• The essentials of care of the older adult include a thorough psychiatric
history, detailed medical and medication review, and comprehensive
mental status exam.
• Medical comorbidity affects the presentation, assessment, and man-
agement of psychiatric illness.
• The inappropriate use of medications and polypharmacy contribute
significantly to poor health and functional outcomes in the geriatric
population.
Geriatrics 519
7. SELF-ASSESSMENT
7.1. Which of the following is true?
(A) An inverted U-curve typifies the course of happiness over a lifetime.
(B) Because the perception of stress uniformly increases as we age, our
risk for mental disorders also uniformly increases.
(C) Older persons are less effective than younger persons at controlling
negative emotions, which explains the higher risk for depression in
later life.
(D) Because older adults cannot control negative emotions, their efficiency
performance on memory tasks declines.
(E) Older adults have a greater sense of well-being starting about middle-
age and continuing through their later years.
520 R. Espinoza
(B) Lower infant mortality rates account for some of the increase in the
older population worldwide.
(C) Across the world, women tend to outnumber men in later life.
(D) Differences in cultural attitudes toward aging explain some of the
variable experiences of growing older.
(E) Increased rates of death in men due to heart disease, lung cancer,
and violence account for the differences in gender longevity in later
life.
8. CASE STUDIES
8.1. Depression in an older adult
A 78-year-old woman is brought in for consultation by her children
because she is more nervous, refuses to leave her house, and no longer is
cooking, cleaning, or marketing. During the interview the patient says life
is hopeless and she has no future. About an year ago her husband died, and
six months ago her closest sister also passed away unexpectedly. She feels
guilty about both deaths, thinking she could have saved them if she had
paid closer attention to their ailments. She is worried about finances,
becoming impoverished, and having no home, despite reassurances from
her children that her house is paid for and she has ample funds. While
denying suicidal ideation, she adds, “If I do not wake up tomorrow, it
would be okay. I am done.” She denied frank hallucinations.
Physical exam shows normal vital signs except for mild temperature
elevation. She appears undernourished and unkempt and has dry mucus
membranes. She has lost 10 pounds in one month. The remainder of her
physical and neurological exam is unremarkable. Mental status exam
reveals psychomotor slowing with increased speech latency. No parapha-
sic errors are noted. Her Montreal Cognitive Exam score is 25, but she
extends minimal effort. She has poor attention and missed items on recall
but did better with cueing. She refused to draw a clock or copy a cube. Her
Geriatrics 521
mood is “terrible” and affect is congruent and constricted. Insight into her
illness is poor because she denies being depressed, and judgment is also
poor, because she refuses help and support.
Laboratory studies were normal except for elevated BUN and Cr and a
slightly elevated albumin but low normal prealbumin. TSH and urinalysis
were also normal.
The patient is given a diagnosis of Major Depression, severe with psy-
chosis, and admitted to hospital due to her dehydration and nutritional
compromise. Given the relative urgency, ECT is recommended, and she
agrees. After eight sessions, she is remarkably improved, no longer fixated
on finances, and feels as if life with her children and grandchildren will
keep her quite busy. She is discharged to continue outpatient psychiatric
care and will enroll in a day treatment program.
522 R. Espinoza
hygiene, as well as screens for alcohol abuse. In eight visits the man’s
symptoms have resolved and he enrolls in a sculpting class.
REFERENCES
1. Agronin ME, Maletta GJ. (2006) Principles and Practice of Geriatric
Psychiatry. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York.
2. Berks J, McCormick R. (2008) Screening for alcohol misuse in elderly
primary care patients: A systematic literature review. Int Psychogeriatr
20(6): 1090–1103.
3. Blazer DG, Steffens DC. (2009) Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th ed.
American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Washington, DC.
4. Haub C. (2007) The 2007 world population data sheet. In: Population
Reference Bureau. Available at: http://www.prb.org/publications/datasheets/
2007/2007worldpopulationdatasheet.aspx. Accessed on May 12, 2010.
5. Jimenez DE, Alegría M, Chen CN, et al. (2010) Prevalence of psychiatric
illnesses in older ethnic minority adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(2): 256–264.
6. Juurlink DN, Herrmann N, Szalai JP, et al. (2004) Medical illness and the
risk of suicide in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 164(11): 1179–1184.
7. Katona C, Chiu E, Adelman S, et al. (2009) World psychiatric association sec-
tion of old age psychiatry consensus statement on ethics and capacity in older
people with mental disorders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 24(12): 1319–1324.
8. Kessler RC, Birnbaum HG, Shahly V, et al. (2010) Age differences in the
prevalence and co-morbidity of DSM-IV major depressive episodes: Results
from the WHO world mental health survey initiative. Depress Anxiety 27(4):
351–364.
9. Kuwert P, Klauer T, Eichhorn S, et al. (2010) Trauma and current posttrau-
matic stress symptoms in elderly German women who experienced wartime
rapes in 1945. J Nerv Ment Dis 198(6): 450–451.
10. Lai DW. (2009) Older Chinese’ attitudes toward aging and the relationship to
mental health: An international comparison. Soc Work Health Care 48(3):
243–259.
11. Mickley KR, Kensinger EA. (2009) Phenomenological characteristics of
emotional memories in younger and older adults. Memory 17(5): 528–543.
12. Priebe S, Bogic M, Ajdukovic D, et al. (2010) Mental disorders following war
in the Balkans: A study in 5 countries. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67(5): 518–528.
Geriatrics 523
13. Reifler BV, Cohen W. (1998) Practice of geriatric psychiatry and mental
health services for the elderly: Results of an international survey. Int
Psychogeriatr 10(4): 351–357.
14. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. (2008) Age and the balance of emotions. Soc Sci Med
66(12): 2391–2400.
15. Scheibe S, Blanchard-Fields F. (2009) Effects of regulating emotions on
cognitive performance: What is costly for young adults is not so costly for
older adults. Psychol Aging 24(1): 217–223.
16. Shah A, Doe P, Deverill K. (2008) Ethnic minority elders: Are they neglected in
published geriatric psychiatry literature? Int Psychogeriatr 20(5): 1041–1045.
17. Shulman KI, Herrmann N, Brodaty H, et al. IPA survey of brief cognitive
screening instruments. Int Psychogeriatr 18(2): 281–294.
18. Spitzer C, Barnow S, Völzke H, et al. (2008) Trauma and posttraumatic stress
disorder in the elderly: Findings from a German community study. J Clin
Psychiatry 69(5): 693–700.
19. Stessman J, Cohen A, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, et al. (2008) Holocaust
survivors in old age: The Jerusalem longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc
56(3): 470–477.
20. Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Deaton A. (2010) A snapshot of the
age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 107(22): 9985–9990.
21. Sullivan SJ, Mikels JA, Carstensen LL. (2010) You never lose the ages
you’ve been: Affective perspective taking in older adults. Psychol Aging
25(1): 229–234.
22. United Nations (UN), World Population Ageing: 1950–2050. Available at:
www.un.org/esa/population/publications/worldageing19502050. Accessed
on November 22, 2010.
Chapter 21
Emergency Psychiatry
1. INTRODUCTION
Psychiatric emergencies are acute clinical situations that demand immedi-
ate assessment, evaluation, and treatment. Psychiatric emergencies may
occur at any time, at any place, and really, to any person. They can arise
after a long period of observation or over a very short duration. When psy-
chiatric emergencies are perceived by the identified patient, the patient’s
family or friends, clinicians, police, bystanders, or others, a response is
invoked that usually includes a referral for emergency psychiatric
evaluation.
Common psychiatric emergencies include suicidal ideation or suicidal
behavior; danger to others based on psychiatric problems; inability to care
for oneself related to a mental condition; or acute mental status changes.
These may be due to an underlying medical condition (metabolic abnor-
mality, infections, cerebrovascular condition, etc.); new onset psychotic
disorder; substance use; depression or bipolar disorder; anxiety; dementia;
and/or adjustment issues.
The goals for psychiatric emergency care are to provide access to care;
deliver timely care; assure safety and stabilization; and provide appropri-
ate treatment and continuity of care.4 The type of psychiatric emergency,
settings, nature of the problem, and availability of resources will all drive
how to best provide the evaluation and management. Triaging to another
524
opposed to the interaction with mental health providers. Patients who are
actively psychotic may be paranoid about the treatment team. Manic
patients may be unaware of the danger of their mental condition. Severely
depressed patients may be bent on suicide or near catatonic, each of which
presents a different challenge. Moreover, the provider attempting the
interaction is generally under significant time pressure and this provider
will rarely have a longitudinal relationship with the patient to draw upon
in attempting to get the patient to tell their story. In all, attempting to build
rapport in the emergency department can be challenging and yet it is
essential to eliciting the history needed to stabilize the patient.
Patients in distress do want to have their situation understood by
another person. As such, the task of establishing rapport is not insur-
mountable. The patient should be addressed with respect and in a non-
threatening manner. The history should be initially elicited using open
ended questions so that the patient can relate their experience in a narra-
tive fashion and generate a framework for the patient’s history of present
illness. The use of active listening and empathetic reflection can help the
patient feel heard and may promote additional detail. Any issues of physi-
cal comfort, such as the need for food or water, can be addressed to the
degree possible while maintaining safety. Providing for these needs may
also help build the patient’s trust in the treatment team. Closed ended
questions can then be used to fill in the details of the history of present
illness.
At times, the examiner may feel compelled to challenge the patient’s
statements. However, this is not done without cost. For example, a psy-
chotic patient may express fear that a secret government organization is
out to get him, prompting the provider to reassure the patient that there is
no such government organization. However, a challenge of this sort may
make the patient feel that they are not being believed and, in turn, may
rupture the fragile therapeutic relationship. The patient may even incorpo-
rate the examiner into their paranoid delusions. In this circumstance,
it may be a better idea to empathize with the patient’s fear rather than
reassure the patient of the facts of his situation. However, if the rapport
is judged to be strong enough, a gingerly delivered challenge may provide
critical diagnostic information. For example, if the patient in this example
agrees with the challenge and questions the thoughts about the government
Verbal Behavioral
Increased volume Increased muscle tension
Tense or sarcastic tone of voice Glaring eye contact
Coarsening of vocabulary Clenching fist or jaw
Demanding content Pacing
Insults or personal attacks Inability to sit still
Threats Pointing
Pushing
Striking
These interventions are also not without their cost. Secluded patients
experience a dramatic transgression of their right to free movement.
Moreover, secluded patients can still injure themselves by throwing them-
selves against the walls or by striking themselves, and, as such, this may
be an insufficient intervention when addressing a patient at acute risk of
self-injury. Restrained patients may injure themselves when fighting
against the restraints.11 As such, these patients need to be closely moni-
tored, including regular medical monitoring, for prevention of morbidity
or mortality. Finally, administration of seclusion and/or restraint carries a
very high risk for injury to the treatment team. This should only be done
by trained individuals and should only be done when there are a sufficient
number of trained individuals present to execute the intervention.
As discussed previously, agitated patients are at risk of committing
violence against their examiners. Aside from recognition of agitation, risk
of violence against an examiner can be reduced in a number of ways. First,
the physical environment in which the evaluation is taking place can be
designed in a manner that prevents violence. For example, the patient could
2.3. Evaluation
The critical assessment question in any psychiatric emergency is
whether or not the patient experiencing an emergency that can be
resolved in the current setting of care or whether the patient will need a
higher level of care. For example, a crying patient encountered in a
clinic may be effectively consoled there, but a suicidal patient in the
same setting may need further evaluation in an emergency department.
Additionally, patients who are newly psychotic and unable to care for
themselves may warrant psychiatric hospitalization until the reason for
the psychosis can be identified and resolved and until social supports
can be established to prevent relapse of the psychosis after discharge.
The examination of the patient should be conducted with this critical
assessment question in mind.
It is important to note that critical elements of the history and examina-
tion will be obtained during the process of generating rapport and address-
ing agitation. As such, the examination should not be conceptualized as an
independent or secondary phase of the interaction.
The exact criteria for psychiatric hospitalization will vary from emer-
gency to emergency. However, the guiding concept is that hospitalization is
warranted for patients who cannot protect themselves without this level of
supervision or for patients who would be too much of a threat to the society
at large if they were not hospitalized. The following section of this chapter
goes into additional detail regarding common psychiatric emergencies.
next day, they may fantasize about various ways to die, they may develop
a specific plan to end their life, and they may then carry out that plan.
3.1.3. Management
Determining the appropriate treatment setting is the most important
decision in the emergency setting. The options available to clinicians vary
between nations, as do the criteria for involuntary and voluntary hospitali-
zation. However, inpatient treatment is indicated for high risk suicidal
patients. A 2005 study of clinical decision making at a psychiatric emer-
gency unit in Madrid, Spain found six variables associated with hospitali-
zation: intention to repeat the attempt, a highly lethal method, low
psychosocial functioning, previous hospitalization, previous suicide
attempt, and belief that nobody would try to save their life.3 For lower risk
patients, issues such as availability of outpatient follow-up and social sup-
port often determine disposition. These also depend heavily on specific
treatment setting and healthcare services that vary between countries.7
Since the advent of dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT), emergency
management of patients with acute suicidality superimposed on chronic
suicidal ideation has changed. Outpatient management of these patients may
be in their best interests in the long term, though the emergency psychiatrist
is still responsible for at least ameliorating the acute exacerbation in suicidal
ideation. A DBT-informed approach may be useful in this situation. Please
see Chapter 27 for further guidance regarding suicidal ideation.
3.2.3. Management
The risk assessment for violence toward others is similar to that for sui-
cidal risk. The immediate concern is ensuring a safe environment for the
patient, staff, and any others in the area. This includes a thorough search
of their person for potential weapons and treatment of agitation.
4. PSYCHOSIS
4.1. Definition
Psychosis refers to disordered thought and behavior, often manifesting as
hallucinations, delusions, and thought process disturbances. Hallucina-
tions, the perception of something when there is no clear stimulus, can be
in any sensory domain — auditory, visual, tactile, gustatory, and olfactory.
Moreover, patients may have illusions, defined as the misinterpretation of
a sensory stimulus; for example, a delirious patient may see an IV pole as
a long lost relative. Delusions are fixed false beliefs that are incongruous
with the patient’s culture. Common delusions fall into paranoid, grandi-
ose, hyper-religious, or somatic themes. In contrast to distortions that may
be driven by mood or anxiety conditions, delusions tend to get stronger
when they are challenged with logic. Thoughts may be tangential, loosely
associated, circumferential, concrete, derailed, or some combination of
these features.
Psychosis is a symptom that may result from several primary psychiat-
ric disorders, general medical conditions, and substance use. Rapidity of
onset tends to point towards a general medical or substance related etiol-
ogy to the psychosis. This is a particularly important consideration in the
emergency setting.
4.3. Management
One of the earliest decisions to make, prior to a full psychiatric assess-
ment, is whether a patient is medically stable. The somatic complaints of
psychotic patients should not be dismissed lightly, as there is significant
evidence that patients with primary psychotic disorders have higher rates
of medical comorbidity than the general population.22 Moreover, a serious
medical illness may present first with psychosis, especially in an other-
wise mentally well individual. Concern for serious illness should result in
referral for appropriate medical evaluation, with the mental health profes-
sional clearly articulating their concerns to medical staff.
A full psychiatric evaluation is often difficult to complete in frankly
psychotic individuals; however it is important to gather as much informa-
tion as possible about the patient’s current symptoms. When auditory hal-
lucinations are present, important points include the number of voices,
whether they speak directly to the patient, and whether they command the
patient toward certain actions. Any of these features indicate more serious
psychotic symptoms, and therefore higher risk. Patient’s actions prior to
the encounter and in response to challenges of suspected delusions as well
as the content of their hallucinations may inform the assessment, even
when the patient denies having delusions. When the patient is unwilling
or unable to provide relevant history, gaining collateral information from
medical records, outpatient providers, and family members is critical.
Psychotic patients are at higher risk of being agitated and, due to their
psychosis, they may be less amenable to verbal redirection. As such, treat-
ment providers should have a low threshold for use of medications, espe-
cially antipsychotic medications, in the management of agitation as
discussed above.
After full evaluation, the primary management decision is whether the
patient requires admission. This decision is based not only on careful risk
assessment, but also on the patient’s likely compliance and the level of
services available in the community. Thus, a patient who is too psychotic
to be able to care for themselves or receive care in the community should
be considered for inpatient treatment. However, a patient with good
capacity to access social supports, e.g. treatment providers who are trusted
even when the patient is paranoid, and with rapid access to outpatient
appointments may be safely treated in the community. Moreover, medica-
tion adjustments based on the ER evaluation may help keep the patient’s
psychosis under control until they can meet with their customary treat-
ment providers. For further discussion, please see the chapter on psychotic
disorders.
5. MANIA
5.1. Definition
Mania refers to state of abnormally elevated, expansive, or irritable mood.
Common causes include bipolar disorder, intoxication with cocaine or
other stimulants, and schizoaffective disorder. The differential also
includes medical conditions such as hyperthyroidism, as well as the
effects of prescription medications such as corticosteroids. To meet ICD-10
criteria, the mood alteration must persist for at least one week, and be
5.3. Management
While they often present in a euphoric, affable state, manic patients may
quickly become irritated and agitated, or even manifest psychosis, when
bothered by questioning during evaluation or by other patients in the
emergency department. Having security staff on hand for these situations
is advisable. As with psychotic patients, obtaining appropriate medical
evaluation is absolutely necessary, as is maintaining a low threshold for
use of medications, especially antipsychotic medications, in the manage-
ment of agitation.
Interviewing manic patients can be challenging, even when they are not
irritable. It helps to keep questions as close-ended as possible to avoid
long-winded and tangential responses. In the emergency setting, eliciting
a history of high-risk activities and functional impairment is a more
immediate concern than eliciting a lifetime history of episodes in order to
make a firm diagnosis. Relevant topics include promiscuous sexual activ-
ity, excessive spending, and run-ins with law enforcement.
The decision to hospitalize should be made based on careful safety
assessment. The primary reason to admit manic patients is when they
represent a danger to themselves or others, such as when their risky
6. ANXIETY
6.1. Definition
The ICD-10 identifies multiple categories of anxiety disorders, including
disorders with periodic elevation in anxiety (such as phobic anxiety disor-
ders), disorders with more sustained elevation in anxiety (such as general-
ized anxiety disorder and hypochondriasis), and conversion disorders.
Patients may present to the emergency department with symptoms of any
of these conditions. Indeed, many patients have a tendency towards anxi-
ety that manifests itself through multiple anxiety disorders. Because of the
somatic nature of anxiety symptoms, many of these patients will initially
present with a somatic chief complaint that will later be discovered to be
driven by anxiety. Details regarding the anxiety disorders are provided
elsewhere in this book.
6.3. Management
As with other presenting complaints, the first responsibility of the emer-
gency psychiatrist is to ensure that the patient does not have an indication
for hospitalization, either medical or psychiatric. Some providers are too
quick to ascribe a physical symptom with an atypical presentation to a
psychiatric diagnosis, like anxiety. Thus, the evaluating mental health
professional should be especially certain that the patient’s physical com-
plaint has not been prematurely dismissed. Chest pain, for example, is a
common complaint in a panic attack. A 2003 meta-analysis found that the
following five variables correlate with panic disorder in patients present-
ing to the emergency room with chest pain: younger age, female sex,
higher self-reported anxiety, atypical character to the chest pain, and
absence of known coronary artery disease.12
Once cleared for outpatient management, the management approach
for patients with sustained anxiety is different from that for patients with
non-sustained periodic anxiety, i.e. panic attacks. In either circumstance,
if a risk factor for worsening anxiety is identified, a strategy for ameliorat-
ing this risk factor should also be established.
Patients with panic attacks can be reassured that their attacks are emo-
tional in nature and not in and of themselves dangerous to their health.
7. DISPOSITION
Based on the facts of the case at hand, a patient may be deemed appropriate
for inpatient or outpatient psychiatric treatment, including treatment in a
partial hospital or other day treatment program. This section details the steps
needed to complete a safe discharge from the emergency department.
7.1. Inpatient
At the moment that the patient is determined to be appropriate for inpa-
tient psychiatric treatment, the objective of the patient’s care in the emer-
gency department shifts towards maintenance of stability until the patient
can be safely transferred to an inpatient facility. This includes administra-
tion of medications or other interventions to help the patient remain calm
and ensuring that the patient does not leave the supervision of the
emergency personnel. Depending on how long the patient remains in the
emergency department, the patient may also need their regularly sched-
uled psychiatric and non-psychiatric medications, meals, a place to sleep,
and perhaps even means of grooming.
7.2. Outpatient
If the patient is not appropriate for inpatient treatment, then the treatment
team should develop a plan to ensure that the patient does not have to return
to the emergency department due to an exacerbation of their presenting
complaint. The patient may only require a psychopharmacologic or psy-
chotherapeutic intervention in the emergency department, for example, an
8. CONCLUSION
Psychiatric emergencies are defined as any change in a patient’s mental
status that may lead to intentional or unintentional dangerousness to them-
selves or other people or a general inability to care for themselves in their
current social setting. These emergencies can be challenging, though can
certainly be managed by maintaining empathy in establishing rapport and
by being attentive to any treatment interfering behavior by the patient,
such as agitation or acute violence. Specific psychiatric emergencies have
different features, though their management generally involves identifica-
tion of present risk factors, reduction of these risk factors in the patient’s
current setting to the degree possible, and referral to a higher level of care
if complete reduction of risk factors cannot be completed in the current
treatment setting.
9. KEY POINTS
• Psychiatric emergencies are situations in which a patient cannot maintain
their safety or refrain from endangering others as a result of their mental
illness. Common emergencies include severe suicidal ideation, severe
homicidal ideation, severe psychosis, mania, and severe anxiety.
• Patients in crisis are at risk of agitation, disrupting rapport with their
treatment providers, and further putting themselves and their treat-
ment providers at risk of injury. Agitation should be recognized and
addressed verbally first, then with medications and other more restric-
tive measures if needed.
• If the crisis can be addressed in the current treatment setting and
changes to the patient’s treatment plan can be made to prevent reap-
pearance of the crisis, then hospitalization can be avoided. If these
10. SELF-ASSESSMENT
10.1. According to a 2005 study, which of the following risk
factors closely correlates with the decision to pursue
inpatient hospitalization of a suicidal patient?
(A) Presence of a plan.
(B) Available social supports.
(C) Prior suicide attempt.
(D) Male gender.
(E) Family history of suicide.
Prior suicide attempt greatly increases the risk of repeat suicide attempt,
and closely correlates with the decision to admit a suicidal patient.3
Answer: C
increasing amount of alcohol over the past two months, though he is not
intoxicated currently.
While collateral information was being obtained, Mr G becomes agi-
tated, shouting “I need sanctuary!” repeatedly. He receives a single dose
of olanzapine and subsequently calms. Due to his recurrent agitation, he
is admitted to the inpatient unit for further stabilization.
and was not terribly worried about them. She denied having symptoms like
this prior to other examinations, and is not upset at having missed the
examination today. Because of her outstanding performance in class
through the semester, the examination was not going to change her final
grade in the course. The patient does appear calm and denied any depres-
sion, anhedonia, psychotic symptoms, or suicidal/homicidal ideation.
The psychiatrist talked with the patient’s mother in private, who con-
firms that the patient is generally calm and collected. The patient did not
have significant separation anxiety when she started in school. There is no
family history of anxiety disorders.
The psychiatrist insisted that the patient receive a more thorough evalu-
ation for causes of pre-syncope. The remainder of the patient’s evaluation
was deferred to the ER physician. On outpatient arrhythmia monitoring,
the patient was found to have a paroxysmal arrhythmia.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank Rockafeller Oteng, MD for his thoughtful
comments in preparing this chapter.
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Text Revision, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.,
Washington, DC.
2. Appelbaum PS. (2007) Legal issues in emergency psychiatry. In: Appelbaum
PS, Gutheil T (eds.), Clinical Handbook of Psychiatry and the Law, 4th ed.
pp. 42–79, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Baca-García E, Diaz-Sastre C, Resa EG, Blasco H, Conesa DB, Saiz-Ruiz J,
de Leon J. (2004) Variables associated with hospitalization decisions by emer-
gency psychiatrists after a patient’s suicide attempt. Psychiatr Ser 55(7): 792–797.
4. Breslow RE. (2002) Structure and function of psychiatric emergency
services. In: Allen M (ed.), Emergency Psychiatry, pp. 1, American
Psychiatric Publishing Inc., Washington DC.
5. Dilsaver SC, Chen Y-W, Swann AC, Shoaib AM, Tsai-Dilsaver Y, Krajewski KJ.
(1997) Suicidality, panic disorder and psychosis in bipolar depression, depres-
sive-mania and pure mania. Psychiatry Res 73: 47–56.
21. Swanson JW, Holzer CE, Ganju VK, Jono RT. (1990) Violence and psychi-
atric disorder in the community: Evidence from epidemiologic catchement
area surveys. Hosp Community Psychiatry 41: 761–770.
22. Weber NS, Cowan DN, Millikan AM, Niebuhr DW. (2009) Psychiatric and
general medical conditions comorbid with schizophrenia in the national
hospital discharge survey. Psychiatr Serv 60(8): 1059–1067.
23. Yildiz A, Sachs GS, Turgay A. (2003) Pharmacological management of
agitation in emergency settings. Emerg Med J 20(4): 339–346.
Chapter 22
Outpatient Psychiatry
1. INTRODUCTION
Psychiatric services provided in the outpatient clinic include psychiatric
evaluation, medication management, and individual psychotherapy. Other
services may include group, couples, and family therapy, neuropsychologi-
cal testing, social services, and vocational counseling for patients. Outpatient
services may be provided in a variety of settings including solo or group
practice. Group practice may include collaborative care models, where the
psychiatrist sees patients in primary care or other (non-psychiatric)
specialty clinics.
This chapter will provide a broad overview of pertinent aspects of
psychiatric practice in the outpatient setting. Topics to be covered include
professional and ethical considerations, the format of the psychiatric
interview and mental status examination, and attention to safety in the
outpatient clinic. The development of the differential diagnosis and case
formulation will also be discussed along with outpatient treatments.
Patients may present independently for psychiatric evaluation and treat-
ment but are often referred from another health care provider. The referral
process is an important step in initiating treatment for the patient. If the
patient is being referred from another health care provider, it is important to
know what prompted the referral and if the referring provider would like the
psychiatrist to assume psychiatric care of the patient or to simply answer a
554
and patient compliance with treatment could also suffer. The psychiatrist
strengthens this alliance through professional conduct and with attitudes
of caring, concern, and respect.4 The interview should take place in a pri-
vate, comfortable, and quiet setting, and interruption of the interview must
only occur during an emergency. There should be no barrier between the
interviewer and the patient that would obstruct the complete view of the
patient. The patient’s general appearance, facial expressions, posture, and
movements may reveal information that otherwise would be lost if the
psychiatrist were unable to view the patient completely. Chairs or couches
must be comfortable enough for the patient to sit for the entirety of the
interview, and extra chairs should be available for the patient’s family or
friends.
Often, the patient will be accompanied by family or friends who wish
to be present during the interview. In Western culture, it is common to
interview the patient privately initially and invite family or friends in
afterwards, if the patient gives permission to do so. When patients are
interviewed alone, they may provide information they otherwise would
not share in the presence of others. In some other cultures, the family
may expect to stay with the patient during the entire interview. Family
members or friends might be the only reliable source of information
about the patient, particularly when the patient displays gross disorgani-
zation of thought, severe dementia, and so on. When interviewing a
patient who speaks a different language, it is preferable to use a profes-
sional interpreter. Family members or friends may be uncomfortable
asking the patient particular questions or may ask questions in a way the
interviewer did not intend. Conversely, the family member or friend may
subtly edit the patient’s response, altering its meaning to the
psychiatrist.
It is important to have a basic understanding of the patient’s cultural
background and the environment in which the patient lives. Culture may
be defined as the values, beliefs, and customs of a group of people with
whom the patient identifies. Knowledge of the patient’s culture and social
environment (e.g. exposure to war or political unrest) is essential to
understanding the patient and the symptoms and experience the patient
reports.
Patient identification
Chief complaint and reason for referral, if appropriate
History of the present illness
Past psychiatric treatment history
Medical history
Current medications and allergies
Family history (medical and psychiatric)
Social history
Mental status examination
Appearance
Level of consciousness
Cooperation
Behavior
Speech
Orientation
Concentration
Mood and affect
Thought content (including suicidal and homicidal ideation)
Perceptual disturbances (such as visual and auditory hallucinations)
Thought processing
Memory
Abstract thinking
Fund of knowledge
Estimation of intelligence
Insight and judgment
The psychiatric interview and mental exam are the fundamental compo-
nents of the psychiatric evaluation. The process of the evaluation offers the
first opportunity to establish rapport and an effective working relationship
with the patient that will aid in the successful management of their psychiat-
ric issues. Due to the nature of some psychiatric illnesses, there is a potential
for impulsive, even dangerous behavior. It is paramount that the psychiatric
examiner understands basic safety concerns in the outpatient setting.
an elopement risk (e.g. a suicidal patient who tries to flee to avoid hospi-
talization). Many countries have laws pertaining to involuntary treatment
of mental illness. These laws vary across nations and may vary between
states and jurisdictions, so a clinician must be familiar with the involun-
tary commitment laws governing his or her state or region. In most juris-
dictions in the United States, clinic and hospital security staff will not
detain a patient against his or her will, without a written affidavit indicat-
ing that the clinician has evidence or reason to suspect that the patient
poses an immediate danger to self or others as a result of a psychiatric
condition requiring treatment. Access to required forms or other proce-
dures should be readily available to the clinician. An understanding of the
process for involuntary commitment is important before seeing patients.
• Communicates optimism.
• Collaborates with the patient and other treatment team members in
treatment planning.
comfortable, and reasonably quiet and allow for seating for the patient and
psychiatrist unobstructed by desks or other furniture. The chairs should be
arranged to avoid a confrontational “head on” stance, which could pro-
duce unnecessary anxiety in the patient. A clock should be positioned so
that the psychiatrist may monitor the time unobtrusively.
Fee arrangements for psychotherapy should be established by agree-
ment before the beginning of formal treatment, and it should be made
clear that timely payment for services is a requirement for on-going treat-
ment. A patient’s avoidance of or failure to pay for services may be a
behavior that can be explored and resolved in the therapy process, but if
such behaviors are resistant to change, then the therapy process becomes
untenable.
Observing appropriate professional boundaries is particularly impor-
tant in psychotherapy because psychotherapeutic work between the
patient and psychiatrist involves engagement at a level of emotional inti-
macy and vulnerability that can arouse powerful affinitive or even sexual
feelings. Such feelings are not in themselves considered to be unethical or
unprofessional, but if indulged, they change the professional nature of the
relationship between doctor and patient to a social and personal one.
Because of the inherent power differential between doctor and patient, the
development of a sexual relationship with a patient or former patient is
recognized always to be unethical, even in cases in which the patient may
offer consent. The psychiatrist must avoid exploiting the patient for his or
her own gratification. In avoiding such boundary violations, the psychia-
trist maintains as the top priority the safety and well-being of the patient.3
Observing professional boundaries also means avoiding dual relation-
ships, which compromise the psychiatrist’s primary commitment to clini-
cally benefiting the patient.
13. SELF-ASSESSMENT
13.1. Rapport is
(A) A brief form of psychotherapy.
(B) A type of music popular with young people.
(C) The psychiatric write-up after the interview.
(D) A relationship characterized by mutual trust.
Answer: D10
REFERENCES
1. Brenner JS. (2009) Association between prescription burden and medication
adherence in patients initiating antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 66(16): 1471–1477.
2. Campbell WH, Rohrbaugh RM. (2006) The Biopsychosocial Formulation
Manual A Guide for Mental Health Professionals, pp. 17–70, Routledge, NY.
3. Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO. (1998) Misuses and misunderstandings of bound-
ary theory in clinical and regulatory settings. Am J Psychiatry 155: 409–414.
4. Hales RE, Yudofsky SC. (eds.) (1996) Synopsis of Psychiatry, pp. 188,
American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.
5. Krupnick JL, Sotsky SM, Simmens S, Moyer J, Elkin I, Watkins J, Pilkonis
PA. (1996) The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharma-
cotherapy outcome: Findings in the national institute of mental health
treatment of depression collaborative research program. J Consult Clin
Psychol 64(3): 532–539.
6. Lehrer P, et al. (2002) Psychological aspects of asthma. J Consult Clin
Psychol 70(3): 691–711.
Chapter 23
1. INTRODUCTION
In the United States, recognition of the need for psychiatric services in the
general hospital setting dates back to the early 20th century.9 Over the last
several decades, an extensive body of knowledge pertaining to the care of
people with complex medical/psychiatric illnesses has developed. In the
United States, this led in 2003 to the establishment of “psychosomatic
medicine” as a formal subspecialty of psychiatry.6 Psychosomatic medi-
cine, or “consultation-liaison psychiatry,” services are now integral parts
of many US academic hospitals. In Europe, psychiatrists and psychoso-
maticists are likewise engaged in work at the medicine/psychiatry inter-
face, and in 1997 the European Association for Consultation Liaison
Psychiatry and Psychosomatics (EACLPP) was formed to facilitate clini-
cal, educational, and research growth in this area as well as international
collaboration. Psychiatrists and other health care practitioners in other
parts of the world are actively involved hospital consultation and liaison
work as well.11 Consultation work usually involves a psychiatrist or other
mental health professional responding to a request from a non-psychiatric
colleague to evaluate a patient who is believed to be mentally ill. Liaison
work can involve psychiatric consultations on individual patients, but it is
broader in scope in that it also involves work with patients and caregivers
572
Finally, psychiatrists caring for general hospital patients are often required
to balance the needs of patients, patients’ significant others and caregivers,
and the health care system, and these needs can sometimes be at odds with
one another. Given the economic pressures facing most health care sys-
tems, general hospital psychiatrists also need to demonstrate the economic
benefits of their work to system administrators.10,16
Various authors have reviewed the ingredients necessary for an effec-
tive consultation.7 Early clarification of the reasons and goals for psychi-
atric consultation is of paramount importance. In clarifying these issues, a
psychiatrist should keep in mind the possibility of conflicting agendas, as
discussed above. Once a goal for consultation is established, a thorough
review of the available information is undertaken. Given the frequent
inability of patients, and particularly those who are severely medically ill,
to give accurate historical information, it is imperative that collateral
information such as medical records and information from family mem-
bers, friends, and other caregivers be reviewed. Doing this review before
seeing the patient can put the patient’s statements in the proper context.
Finally, clear and concise communication with the patient, treatment
team, and others involved in the case is essential.
In the hospital setting, rapid interventions are often favored as patients are
typically hospitalized for only a brief time. Medications are often the first
line treatment for anxiety in inpatients. However, a complete assessment of
the cause of a patient’s anxiety may lead to interventions other than medi-
cation management. Cognitive and behavioral therapies are effective treat-
ments for anxiety disorders and may be especially useful in patients with
severe comorbid medical conditions in whom pharmacotherapy may be
contraindicated. The SSRIs are the most common treatment for anxiety
disorders because of their efficacy and favorable side-effect profile.
However, SSRIs may take six or more weeks to become effective and may
initially increase anxiety. Because of this, SSRIs are sometimes started in
conjunction with a benzodiazepine for more immediate relief. Serotonin–
norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are also generally effective in
treating anxiety but, like SSRIs, they can take weeks to work and may
increase anxiety early in treatment. Benzodiazepines are effective in treat-
ing anxiety, reasonably safe, and have a fast onset of action, making them
popular in an acute setting. However, there are risks to using these medica-
tions as well. In the hospital, the largest risk of using a benzodiazepine is
the sedative effect of these medications and patients must often be started
at a low dose to keep them from being over-sedated. Patients with liver
disease and elderly patients can find benzodiazepines to be particularly
sedating. Patients with respiratory problems, including COPD and sleep
apnea, are at risk of significant respiratory impairment with benzodiaz-
epines. Additionally, concerns about abuse and dependence prevent use of
these medications with some patients. Finally, although all benzodiaz-
epines are effective in treating anxiety, the pharmacokinetics of each medi-
cation must be taken into consideration when choosing a treatment. In
general, the risk of rebound anxiety is greater with the short-acting benzo-
diazepines, although the clinical effect of these drugs is more rapid.
Longer-acting medications have a slower onset of action and will clear less
quickly, but there are fewer problems with abrupt onset of sedation and
(1) What are the epidemiological factors at play? In an older patient with
no personal or family history of depression, medical causes of depres-
sion must be carefully sought.
(2) Are the patient’s symptoms due to a medical condition? If so, will treat-
ment of this condition relieve the symptoms? In diseases such as hypo-
thyroidism where treatment of the medical condition will relieve the
depression, this should be done prior to considering other treatments
such as antidepressant medication. If the patient’s depression is due to
a medical condition but treatment of this condition will not relieve the
depression (e.g. post-myocardial infarction or post-stroke depression),
consideration should be given to starting an antidepressant medication.
(3) Are the patient’s symptoms due to a medication?
the true nature of their illness nor will they accept a referral for outpatient
mental health care.13 If patients are willing to accept treatment, it should
be some form of insight-oriented psychotherapy designed to explore why
the patient seeks attention through feigning medical illness. Psychotropic
medication treatment is primarily aimed at addressing comorbid illnesses
and is not the first line of treatment in these patients.
Malingering, like the factitious disorders, involves conscious/inten-
tional feigning or exaggeration of physical and/or mental illnesses. Unlike
factitious illness, though, malingering is motivated primarily by tangible
incentives such as medications of abuse, disability payments, and lawsuit
awards (i.e. “secondary gain”). Unlike factitious disorder patients who
often cooperate with tests and treatments in order to remain in the patient
role, malingerers are generally uncooperative with any medical care that
is not closely related to the gain they are seeking.
Alcohol withdrawal
— Autonomic hyperactivity
— Hand tremor
— Insomnia
— Nausea or vomiting
— Visual, tactile, or auditory hallucinations
— Psychomotor agitation
— Anxiety
— Seizures
Opioid withdrawal
— Anorexia, abdominal cramps, nausea and vomiting
— Anxiety, insomnia, irritability, restlessness
— Opioid cravings
— Dysphoria, fatigue
— Increased blood pressure, pulse, and respiratory rate;
hot and cold flashes; low grade fever
— Headache
— Muscle and bone pain; muscle spasms
— Mydriasis
— Lacrimation, perspiration, piloerection, rhinorrhea
— Yawning
Cocaine withdrawal
— Dysphoria, depression
— Psychomotor agitation or slowing
— Fatigue
— Insomnia or hypersomnia
— Vivid dreams, nightmares
— Appetite increase
have a unique role in teaching and promoting skills that lead to conflict reso-
lution, healthy communication, and role definition for team members. Often
a ‘team meeting’ that allows participants to discuss communication break-
downs and role confusion and then re-focus on patient care can be helpful.
11. CONCLUSION
Psychopathology is highly prevalent in the general hospital population.
As the number of elderly people in society increases, the general hospital
population will become older and more medically complex and the psy-
chopathology burden will increase. This fact and the association of cer-
tain forms of psychopathology with poor medical outcomes suggest
psychiatric services are greatly needed in the general hospital setting.
Obstacles to the delivery of these much-needed services include a lack of
recognition of mental illness by non-psychiatric caregivers, a hospital
environment not well suited to psychiatric work, and difficulty demon-
strating the financial benefits of psychiatric care to administrators.
Hospital psychiatrists must be particularly knowledgeable in the areas of
delirium, agitation and aggression, depression, addictions, suicidality,
and “psychogenic” medical illnesses. Many general hospital mental
health services are now using a multidisciplinary team approach to these
problems.
13. SELF-ASSESSMENT
13.1. Which of the following factors is associated with
a decrease in suicide risk?
(A) Advanced age.
(B) Anxiety.
(C) Insomnia.
(D) Being married.
(E) Impulsivity.
REFERENCES
1. Amato L, Minozzi S, Vecchi S, Davoli M. (2010) Benzodiazepines for
alcohol withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD005063.
2. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. (1988) Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to
treatment. N Engl J Med 319(25): 1635–1638.
3. Evans DL, Charney DS, Lewis L, Golden RN, Gorman JM, Krishnan KR,
et al. (2005) Mood disorders in the medically ill: Scientific review and
recommendations. Biol Psychiatry 58(3): 175–189.
4. Ganzini L, Smith DM, Fenn DS, Lee MA. (1997) Depression and mortality
in medically ill older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 45(3): 307–312.
5. Garrick TR, Stotland NL. (1982) How to write a psychiatric consultation. Am
J Psychiatry 139(7): 849–855.
6. Gitlin DF, Levenson JL, Lyketsos CG. (2004) Psychosomatic medicine:
A new psychiatric subspecialty. Acad Psychiatry 28(1): 4–11.
Chapter 24
Psychiatric Education
are thus twofold. To try and give the reader a comprehensive overview of
the importance of and key elements of education as it relates to psychiatry,
while at the same time ensuring that the reader has a view of key interna-
tional perspectives and innovations in psychiatric education — not just
from our own experiences, but also from the published literature.
5. EXPERIENCE OF PSYCHIATRY
IN MEDICAL SCHOOLS
Additionally, there is considerable international (and even intra-national)
variation in the length of time devoted to psychiatry during the medical
school psychiatry curriculum. In 1994, the World Psychiatric Association
collaborated with the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME)
to devise a core curriculum for undergraduates in psychiatry.23 Prior to its
development, a survey was conducted in medical schools about the
existing curricula for undergraduates in psychiatry which is reviewed by
Dogra and her colleagues.4 Out of a list of 1,305 medical schools pro-
vided by the WFME, the questionnaire was sent to 500 faculties of medi-
cine. Responses came from 124 departments of psychiatry belonging to
Table 1. The Royal College of Psychiatrists’ core curriculum for undergraduate educa-
tion in psychiatry (UK).
Specific to teaching in clinical psychiatry, the principal aims of the undergraduate medical
course should be:
• To provide students with knowledge of the main psychiatric disorders, the principles
underlying modern psychiatric theory, commonly used treatments, and a basis on
which to continue to develop this knowledge.
• To assist students to develop the necessary skills to apply this knowledge in clinical
situations.
• To encourage students to develop the appropriate attitudes necessary to respond
empathically to psychological distress in all medical settings.
(Continued)
Table 1. (Continued)
6. Describe what may constitute risk to self (suicide, self harm and/or neglect, engaging
in high risk behavior) and risk to and from others (including knowledge of child,
adults with learning disabilities, and elder protection requirements).
7. Describe how to assess and manage psychiatric emergencies, which may occur in
psychiatric, general medical, or other settings. In particular be able to describe the
elements of a risk assessment and the management of behavioral disturbance.
8. Describe the basic range of services and professionals involved in the care of people
with mental illness and the role of self help, service user, and carer groups in providing
support to them. As part of this students should be able to describe when psychiatrists
should intervene and when other clinicians should retain responsibility.
Skills
On completion of the course the successful student will be able to:
1. Take a full psychiatric history, assess the mental state (including a cognitive
assessment) and write up a case. This includes being able to describe symptoms and
mental state features, etiological factors, differential diagnoses, a plan of management,
and assessment of prognosis.
2. Screen empathically for common mental health problems in non-psychiatric settings
and recognize where medically unexplained physical symptoms may have
psychological origins.
3. Evaluate and describe patients presenting with abnormal fears/anxieties, pathological
mood states, and problematic, challenging, or unusual behaviors.
4. Summarize and present a psychiatric case in an organized and coherent way to
another professional and be able to discuss management with doctors or other staff
involved in a patient’s care.
5. Recognize the differences between mental health problems and the range of normal
responses to stress and life events.
6. Evaluate information about family relationships and their impact on an individual
patient, which may involve gaining information from other sources.
7. Assess a patient’s potential risk to themselves and others, at any stage of their illness,
and in particular be able to assess a patient following an episode of deliberate
self-harm.
8. Evaluate the impact of psychiatric illness on the individual and their family and those
around them.
9. Find, appraise, and apply information and evidence gained from in depth reading
relating to a specific clinical case.
10. Discuss with patients and relatives the nature of their illness, management options,
and prognosis.
(Continued)
Table 1. (Continued)
Attitudes
On completion of the course the successful student will be able to:
1. Utilize an empathic interviewing style, which is suitable for eliciting information from
disturbed and distressed patients.
2. Recognize the importance of the development of a therapeutic relationship with
patients, including the need for their active involvement in decisions about their care.
3. Demonstrate sensitivity to the concerns of patients and their families about the
stigmatization of psychiatric illness.
4. Recognize the importance of multidisciplinary teamwork in the field of mental illness
in psychiatric, community, and general medical settings, primary care settings, and
some non-medical settings.
5. Demonstrate awareness of capacity, consent, and confidentiality issues as they apply
in psychiatry.
6. Reflect on their own attitudes to patients with mental health problems and how these
might influence their approach to such patients.
7. Reflect on how working in mental health settings may impact upon their own health
and that of colleagues.
disorders such that they will be competent in basic mental health care
whatever specialty they ultimately choose.
build mental health topics into cases at the curriculum design stage so that
these issues are addressed by the students as they learn.
As noted earlier, behavioral science teachers may feel that PBL pro-
vides paradoxically fewer rather than more opportunities to teach to stu-
dents given that most PBL tutors have a limited grounding in and
understanding of behavioral sciences. In integrated curricula, students will
have less protected time (for example in terms of a specific block of
weeks) within one specialty exclusively and unless psychiatrists in the
medical school are very determined and fight for their place within the
faculty, it is not unusual for time spent with psychiatry to decrease rather
than increase. The assumption is of course that more time is now provided
across the whole curriculum, but this requires psychiatric teachers who
are willing to be very flexible and take every opportunity, for example, to
get involved in joint facilitation of a group, to be an ‘expert resource’ to
group members who may come and interview him or her, and provide
support and input wherever possible. Exposure to psychiatry as practiced
more formally in the outpatient clinic or inpatient ward will be less. This
may be a good thing in that psychiatry becomes seen as more widely rel-
evant to medicine as a whole, but it may also mean, on the downside, that
there are fewer opportunities to identify with teachers, get to know
patients with mental health problems over time and break down barriers
and stigma. This will be even more of the case if psychiatric teachers
themselves fail to take the opportunities afforded by redesign so that stu-
dents see very little of them at all.
The question of which educational system is better is still in debate.
Some people say that integrated courses allow students to put knowledge
in context that in traditional courses, and that they prepare students better
for clinical problems in the first years of practice. Supporters of the tradi-
tional method, however, say longer preclinical components give students
a more comprehensive foundation and more thorough grounding of scien-
tific knowledge on which to build an understanding of clinical medicine.
The ATLAS project22 has been the first major attempt to try and map
the form and content of Psychiatric training across the world. The project
arose out of collaboration between the WPA and the World Health
Organization. The WPA sent questionnaires to the 143 National Member
Societies from 121 countries. The major limitation of the study was the
low response rates from the countries. Information on aspects of psychi-
atric training was only available from 74 countries and one WHO
Territory. The reasons for this might have been: absence of a training
program; inability to provide aggregated information when the country is
large with a lot of diversity in the quality of individual programs; absence
of any functioning psychiatric organization in the country or the absence
of any known key person with the ability to respond to the questionnaire.
Even when countries did respond the completion rate was poor. In view of
these limitations, the WHO and WPA then used other sources to gather
more information.
Eventually, it was found that 122 (68.2%) countries had a psychiatric
training program. This varied from 47.4% countries in the WHO Africa
Region to 94.1% countries in the European Region. When analyzed
according to World Bank income group psychiatric training facilities were
present in 54.5% of low income countries compared to 77.1% of high
income countries.
However, clearly the mere presence of a training facility neither pro-
vides sufficient information regarding the quality of training provided nor
the uniformity of training across the country. More detailed information
on aspects of psychiatric training was only available from 74 countries as
indicated above. About half reported having an accredited diploma or a
Master’s degree in psychiatry. Super-specialization in specific areas of
psychiatry or a doctoral program in psychiatry was reported by fewer
countries. Interestingly, while more than 10 teachers for psychiatry were
reported by 32 countries, less than 15 had more than 10 teachers in the
area of clinical psychology, psychiatric social work, and psychiatric nurs-
ing. The minimum duration of training varied to a great degree among
countries. While 22 countries out of 74 reported 3–4 years training for
diplomas, 28 countries reported the same time frame for completing a
Master’s program. Sub-specialization required a further 1–2 years in
18 out of the 35 countries reporting on it. This information must be
is spent in inpatient settings.24 Korea was the first country in Asia to adopt
an America style training program and has a highly structured and stand-
ardized pathway to Board certification, similar to that in North America,
and extensive experience available in psychotherapy. In contrast, the expe-
rience available to trainees in India is much more varied. Training takes
three years leading to an MD for which the completion of a research
project is compulsory. Further training after the MD degree as a senior
registrar for a period of three years leads to eligibility for consultancy.
Many doctors do not opt for senior registrar training, but go into private
practice or work as a psychiatrist in a district hospital. In some hospitals,
it is not deemed necessary to complete senior registrar training to become
a consultant. However, senior registrar training is essential if the trainee
plans a career in academia or plans to join a teaching institution. A signifi-
cant number of trainees from India go abroad to the United Kingdom or
United States for further training and experience.3
In terms of psychiatry residency subspecialty training, in the United
States, there are additional opportunities for training in child and adolescent
psychiatry, addiction, forensics, psychosomatic medicine, and geriatrics.
Further, there are areas such as sleep medicine, pain, and palliative care, to
highlight several where psychiatrists, as well as other types of specialists,
can apply to receive additional training. These programs are accredited by
the American Board of Medical Specialties and there are Board examina-
tions for those who successfully complete their training. The importance of
this increased focused training is seen in enhanced research and scholar-
ship, improved ways to teach, train, and supervise students in these areas,
and opportunities for medical students to choose elective experiences.
It is important to recognize that training across countries will vary
according to the specific sociocultural and economic factors pertaining to
that nation and the prevailing health care system. Zisook et al.24 note that
for Brazil … perhaps the main challenge for residency training … is put-
ting into practice in such a dissimilar reality the knowledge and theories
learned from mainstream American textbooks and recent scientific arti-
cles. Despite marked regional variations, infrastructure is more precari-
ous, funding for research not as accessible, and the salary is extremely
low, even after accounting for cost-of-living. Training in psychiatry in the
United Kingdom is focused towards working in the National Health
Service, with no specific education on aspects relating to private practice.
• Planning of training.
• Sharing experiences and perspectives.
Table 2. (Continued)
Switzerland Uganda
Research Epidemiological and statistical Basic research skills in statistics
training is provided as a and epidemiology are taught
course requirement. as part of the compulsory
Individual skills and research dissertation submitted by all
interests can be gained students as part of their
through an optional one-year course requirement.
posting in a research center.
Public health and Public health principles and Basic principles in public health
health economics health economics as applied and macroeconomics as
to mental health are taught. applied to financing of mental
health systems are provided.
Law and ethics Provision for stipulated period Mental health legislation and
of training in laws and its relevance to practice are
principles of ethics as taught as part of forensic
applied to the country. psychiatry principles.
Cultural sensitivity Aspects of transcultural Knowledge about culture-
psychiatry and social bound syndromes and
psychology are emphasized traditional healing practices
during training to improve are imparted during the
the communication skills training period.
and psychiatric understanding
of multi-ethnic clients.
Others Migration of psychiatrists is Uganda is severely affected my
not a major issue. migration of its limited
number of psychiatrists to
high income countries.
has been shown in one study to only have a correlation of 0.35. Short
answers questions (SAQs) are theoretically easier to focus but there are
still issues as to how candidates interpret what is asked. However, improv-
ing reliability of marking in SAQs is easier than with essays. Some exami-
nation boards have therefore chosen to reject essays and SAQs in favor of
other assessments of knowledge. However, this is not without risk. Unless
assessed in the workplace, the skill of writing, which is core to specialized
psychiatric practice, can be missed out. This is apparent in the letters writ-
ten by some of our own trainees.
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) have been a core feature of medical
examination in many countries for some years but there has been debate
over the best design. Recently the shift has been to single item questions
with an adjusted mark to take into account guessing. Extended matching
items/questions (EMIs or EMQs) have also been developed with the aim
of better assessing knowledge application than with MCQs but with a
higher reliability than can be had with SAQs and essays.
The assessment of knowledge should correlate with those items speci-
fied as core to the curriculum in each specific training system.
This mode of assessment has apparent high face validity in that it simu-
lates the clinical encounter, involves the assessment of real patients, and
requires the demonstration of “higher order” clinical skills such as the
integration of clinical findings and knowledge. However, key clinical
skills are actually rarely observed and their assessment is largely by infer-
ences drawn post-hoc in the following viva.
There are also a number of other potential problems. Luck has a signifi-
cant role to play in candidates’ experiences as the (usually single) case
allocated may play of course to their strengths or weaknesses. Patients
may be helpful, or possibly even hostile, regardless of how a candidate
performs. The symptoms and signs that the patient exhibits on the day of
the examination may vary considerably from that in the summary pre-
pared (sometimes a day or two before) by the organizers for the examin-
ers, and case selection will depend on the local services from which
patients are recruited. Finally, the examiners own skills and prejudices
may play a part in how a candidate is judged to have performed. Wass and
Jolly20 showed that that reliability from a single long case of an hour is
around 0.60 rising to 0.86 after 4 hrs of testing and 0.90 only after 8 hrs,
which would be impossible in most examination centers and still does not
take into account the variation in viva examinations carried out by differ-
ing examiners.
of examination is much higher than the long case as each candidate can be
given a similar experience through the use of standardized patients per-
forming defined roles. The candidates are also assessed against clear
objectives, which can be designed to match an examination “blueprint”
that enables assessment of a broad range of different skills. The OSCE is
now becoming more widely used in both undergraduate and postgraduate
settings in many countries as it allows examination of a greater range of
skills, in a more reliable manner, than a single clinical examination.
practice can be defined in a number of different ways, but all the defini-
tions encapsulate a range of activities associated with both learning and
thinking about the process of learning. Essentially it is a continuous pro-
cess from a personal perspective, informed by considering critical inci-
dents within your life’s experiences. As defined by Schon, reflective
practice involves thoughtfully considering one’s own experiences in
applying knowledge to practice while being coached by professionals in
the discipline.
After qualification as a psychiatrist, there are many opportunities for
engaging in reflective practice. Some will choose to become full-time
clinicians, others may wish to do research, many will be involved in teach-
ing and all of these will be involved in updating their knowledge and skills
from time to time and in doing this will be reflecting on what they have
learned and what they identify as their on-going educational priorities
while taking the opportunity to reflect on their daily clinical practice and
work. All should be also concerned about ensuring that they take care of
their own health and well-being in order to ensure that they are able to
continue to practice safely and competently.
I had just spoken to a meeting of one of our users’ and carers’ organiza-
tions. Mingling at coffee time, I lapped up congratulations on how
approachable the College had become, when I was brought up short by a
long-term patient with a scowl on his face. ‘The trouble with you psychia-
trists’, he said, ‘is that you’re all pill-pushers. You’re all in the pocket of the
drug companies’.
As a child psychiatrist by trade, and as a President who has fought
hard to tighten the College guidelines on sponsorship, I bridled at such
stereotypes. But unfair though they may seem, the charges are persistent
and deserve to be tackled head-on….
7.11. Re-licensing
In some countries (though not yet in the United Kingdom which is a
notable exception here in high income countries although change is cur-
rently on the horizon), CPD policy is intimately involved with the pro-
cess of maintaining one’s license to practice as a psychiatrist. It is
interesting to note that in the ATLAS survey while 40 countries report-
edly had permanent licensing, 19 countries said that they had licensing
for a limited duration only. Continued medical education was cited as a
requirement for maintaining a license in 12 out of the 16 countries
responding to that question. In some countries, such as the United
States, maintaining a license requires not only attending CME but
undergoing formal recertification every 10 years.
7.12. Self-care
As health professionals, we have a duty to ensure that we are fit to prac-
tice. As a group within society, the health care of doctors is problematic:
we have a higher than average risk of succumbing to the four ‘Ds’ —
depression, drink, drugs, and divorce. Several cross-sectional studies have
reported higher rates of depression and burnout among psychiatrists than
among doctors from other specialties. The higher depression scores
among psychiatrists have been mirrored by higher suicide rates over some
decades, both in the United States16 and in the United Kingdom,7 but it is
not clear whether these findings are translated internationally. The main
sources of stress for all doctors seem to be excessive workloads, organi-
zational changes, poor management, and insufficient resources, dealing
with patients’ suffering and mistakes, complaints and litigation, and pres-
sure of work. However, psychiatrists face particular pressures in addition
to these, given the relatively low status of psychiatry as a profession in
many countries, the stigma often experienced by psychiatrists and the low
numbers of psychiatrists practicing in some settings internationally.
Psychiatrists also have to deal with the suicide of patients during their
career.
As doctors, we need to do several things. Ensuring that we do have and
maintain a satisfactory work–life balance, honestly reviewing alcohol
intake (where alcohol is culturally acceptable doctors have a reputation,
supported by evidence, for using it to excess as a coping strategy); ensur-
ing that we keep up with regular health checks and put into practice at
least some on the advice on diet and exercise that we expect others to
follow each day; keep up our support systems with friends and family, and
ensure that if we do experience problems that we seek help early. In our
experience this is often a major barrier for doctors who will continue to
work when they should have sought help. In some countries, licensing
authorities will also expect medical professionals to report colleagues who
are unfit to practice — this is the case in the United Kingdom for the
General Medical Council.
As teachers and supervisors, we have a responsibility to do a number
of things to help prevent mental health problems in our trainees.
At an individual level:
• Teach better coping strategies for stress at undergraduate level.
• Problem-solving skills.
• Coping with self-criticism and conflict.
• Substance misuse.
• Importance of home–work balance.
• Ensure early detection and treatment of problems through close super-
vision and mentoring.
At an organizational level:
8. KEY POINTS
• Psychiatry departments that have high recruitment rates give consid-
erable priority and resources for medical student psychiatric
education.
• The challenge in designing medical school curriculum, whether for
low or middle income countries, is to ensure that medical students
have a good knowledge of how to recognize and manage common
mental health disorders such that they will be competent in basic
mental health care whatever specialty they ultimately choose.
• PBL provides an opportunity to build mental health topics into cases
at the curriculum design stage so that these issues are addressed by the
students as they learn.
• It is important that training in Communication Skills is not seen as a
‘psychiatric’ skill, but as an important skill regardless of which
specialty students will be entering after qualification.
9. SELF-ASSESSMENT
9.1. In the United States, the accreditation council
of graduate medical education has determined
six competencies for all medical specialties,
including psychiatry:
(A) Patient knowledge practice-based teaching, medical skills, interper-
sonal and communication technology, professional billing, and
evidence in practice.
(B) Patient care; medical knowledge, practice-based learning and
improvement; interpersonal and communication skills; professional-
ism and system-based practice.
(C) Patient competency; medical professionalism; medical skills; inter-
personal and communication skills; evidence of professional billing;
evidence in practice.
(D) Primary care competency; practice-based teaching; patient communi-
cation; medical professionalism; medical skills; medical knowledge.
(E) Office-based billing practices; medical skills; professionalism; com-
munication skills; internet skills; evidence in practice.
Answer: B
REFERENCES
1. Chur-Hansen A, Carr JE, Bundy C, et al. (2008) An international perspective
on behavioral science education in medical schools. J Clin Psychol Med
Settings 15: 45–53.
15. Okasha A, Karam E. (1998) Mental health services and research in the Arab
world. Acta Psychiatr Scand 98: 406–413.
16. Rich CL, Pitts FN Jr. (1980) Suicide by psychiatrists: A study of medical
specialists among 18,730 consecutive physician deaths during a five-year
period, 1967–72. J Clin Psychiatry 41: 261–263.
17. Schön DA. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in
Action, Temple Smith, London.
18. Shooter M. (2005) Dancing with the devil? A personal view of psychiatry’s
relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Psychiatr Bull 29: 81–83.
19. Sierles FS, Taylor MA. (1995) Decline of U.S. medical student career choice
of psychiatry and what to do about it. Am J Psychiatry 152: 1416–1426.
20. Wass V, Jolly B. (2001) Does observation add to the validity of the long case?
Med Educ 35: 729–734.
21. World Psychiatric Association. (2002) World Psychiatric Association
Institutional Program on the Core Training Curriculum for Psychiatry,
Available at: http://www.panet.org/detail.php?section_id=8&content_id=112.
Accessed December 26, 2010.
22. World Health Organization. (2005) ATLAS: Psychiatric Education and
Training Across the World 2005, World Health Organization, Geneva.
23. World Psychiatric Association and the World Federation of Medical
Education. (1999) Core curriculum in psychiatry for medical students. Med
Educ 33: 204–211.
24. Zisook S, et al. (2007) Psychiatry residency training around the world. Acad
Psychiatry 31: 309–325.
Chapter 25
Residency Training
1. INTRODUCTION
Psychiatric residency training is one step in the trajectory from novice to
expert as a psychiatric physician. This chapter will describe the longitudinal
process, from the application, through training, and then into practice for
psychiatric specialists. We begin by briefly describing the typical path a
student in the United States takes to enter residency, followed by a discus-
sion of the admissions process, with special emphasis on features relevant to
International Medical Graduates (IMGs). An overview of a typical psychia-
try residency training program is provided, including the structure and over-
sight, regulatory issues, curriculum, and clinical experiences. Where useful,
the authors will amplify general principles with specific examples from the
training program with which they are affiliated. The chapter will conclude
with a brief discussion of post-residency issues, including fellowships,
board certification, maintenance of licensure, and employment options.
642
3.1. Applications
3.1.1. Electronic Residency Application Service
The ERAS is an electronic service that gathers application documents,
such as personal statements, letters of recommendation, and medical
school transcripts, and then transmits them to residency training programs
across the United States. Nearly all residency training programs partici-
pate in ERAS, so applicants need to become familiar with this service.
The ERAS website4 provides applicants and programs detailed informa-
tion on the entire application process. Students also find the MYERAS
section of the ERAS website to be a “friendly” user guide. US medical
students gain access to the ERAS website through the Dean’s office of
their medical school, which registers with ERAS and provides each stu-
dent with an electronic “token” that allows access.
(1) The Common Application Form: This is where applicants can enter
demographic information and their curriculum vitae (CV). This form
will be seen by every program to which the applicant applies.
Applicants might find it useful to try to provide brief, informative
descriptions of various activities they enter on their CV to demonstrate
how that activity has contributed to their unique skills and mastery.
(2) The Personal Statement: A large number of websites and services
assist applicants with personal statements. Those will not be reviewed
1. Keep it relatively short: The people reviewing applications typically read dozens
(or even hundreds) of them. Personal statements that go much beyond a page are
more likely to be skimmed rather than carefully read.
2. Tailor it to the program: ERAS allows applicants to upload multiple personal
statements, which can be assigned to different programs. Applicants may want to
consider modifying their personal statement to make it more appealing to different
programs on their list.
3. Proofread: Fairly or not, programs may question English proficiency. The personal
statement is an opportunity to demonstrate fluency, so make sure it contains no
grammatical errors.
rates of accepting IMGs and guide the decision about whether or not to
apply there.
3.2. Interviews
Because interviews are typically the only face-to-face contact between
applicants and training programs, they usually play a significant role in
each program’s selection process. Although the criteria for being offered
an interview varies with each program, in general, interviews are offered
after the program has reviewed the applicant’s ERAS application and
determined that he or she meets the program’s criteria. Typically, some
combination of the applicant’s grades, examination scores, accomplish-
ments, personal statement, and letters of recommendation are used to
make this determination. Most programs begin issuing invitations for
interviews before the Dean’s Letters are available, so it is important to
complete as much of the rest of the application by late summer to early
fall. Proactive applicants are likely to place themselves at an advantage.
Many programs screen hundreds of applications, with each one reading
more alike than different. Therefore, programs often make arbitrary, best
estimates of who they invite first, knowing full well that they may be miss-
ing several outstanding applicants. If an applicant does not hear from a
program in which he or she is interested, a call or an e-mail to the Program
Director may make all the difference. There may be a fine line between
healthy assertiveness and intrusive aggressiveness, but it often is benefi-
cial for an applicant to let a program know of his or her interest.
sense of the unique features of the program and what is desired in appli-
cants. Friends or colleagues who have applied to (or attend) this program
can often be a valuable source of information as well.
Applicants who are anxious or who struggle with interview situations
may benefit from practice interviews. These can be with colleagues or
faculty at their own medical school. However, it would be most beneficial
to practice with someone who administers (or at the very least has gone
through) interviews at a US medical school. Many websites also list ques-
tions that are commonly asked during residency interviews.
of residents and faculty. This can also help when doing post-interview
follow up (see next section).
years. For this reason, applicants are advised to rank only programs that
they are willing to attend. In addition, while programs were previously
able to offer some of their positions outside the match, NRMP now man-
dates that any program participating in the match has to list all its PGY-1
and -2 open positions in the match (often known as the “all in” rule).
Rank lists for both applicants and programs are usually due in mid-
February, with the Match results typically being published one month
later. Most medical schools hold a “Match Day” celebration, in which
applicants find out where they have matched. Match information is also
available on the NRMP website.
5. RESIDENCY TRAINING
Different residency programs have wide variability in curriculum and
organization. However, they also share many common elements. In this
section, we will describe ACGME requirements for residency training and
describe how a typical program may meet the requirements for clinical
rotations, didactic curriculum, and supervision.
will often offer residents a choice of clinics through which they can rotate.
For example, residents may be able to choose clinics focusing on mood
disorders, anxiety disorders, or psychotic disorders. Some programs have
a combination psychiatric and primary care clinic, in which residents treat
both psychiatric and medical issues and receive supervision from both a
psychiatry attending and a medicine attending.
PGY-2 is also often the year in which residents begin their psycho-
therapy experience. Many programs will require residents to carry a mini-
mum number of psychotherapy patients, with appropriate supervision.
with specific focus for residents with cultural backgrounds that are
different from those of their patients;
(9) Case formulation that includes neurobiological, phenomenological,
psychological, and sociocultural issues involved in the diagnosis and
management of cases;
(10) Instruction in research methods in the clinical, biological, and
behavioral sciences related to psychiatry, including techniques to
appraise the professional and scientific literature and to apply evi-
dence-based findings to patient care. Each program must provide the
following:
(a) All residents must be educated in research literacy. Research
literacy is the ability to critically appraise and understand the
relevant research literature and to apply research findings appro-
priately to clinical practice. The concepts and process of
Evidence Based Clinical Practice include skill development in
question formulation, information searching, critical appraisal,
and medical decision-making, thus providing the structure for
teaching research literacy to psychiatry residents. The program
must promote an atmosphere of scholarly inquiry, including the
access to on-going research activity in psychiatry. Residents
must be taught the design and interpretation of data.
(b) The program must provide residents with research opportunities
and the opportunity for development of research skills for resi-
dents interested in conducting research in psychiatry or related
fields. The program must provide interested residents access to
and the opportunity to participate actively in on-going research
under a mentor. If unavailable in the local program, efforts to
establish such mentoring programs are encouraged.
(c) The program must ensure the participation of residents and fac-
ulty in journal clubs, research conferences, didactics, and/or
other activities that address critical appraisal of the literature
and understanding of the research process.
the previous year. For example, one US program uses the following
framework:
5.6.1. PGY-1
First-year residents receive a “Crash Course” in psychiatry that covers
essential information they will need to know in order to capably treat
patients in the emergency department and wards. Following the Crash
Course, the core curriculum occurs during a half-day period of “protected
time,” when the PGY-1 residents are kept free of all routine clinical
responsibilities and expected to attend seminars. This half-day period
includes two weekly seminars and departmental Grand Rounds. The first
seminar focuses on Adult Psychopathology and the second on Inter-
viewing, Communication Skills, and Supportive Psychotherapy.
5.6.2. PGY-2
Second-year residents also have a half-day of protected time, during
which they continue to attend the seminar series and departmental Ground
Rounds. The PGY-2 seminar series expands on topics that were first
presented in PGY-1. Additional topics include therapeutic interventions,
geriatric psychiatry, consultation-liaison, child development and psycho-
pathology, behavioral neurology, cross-cultural psychiatry, marital and
family therapy, and reading the literature. In addition, there are two
weekly seminars on psychotherapy: one on CBT and another on the
“Foundation of Dynamic Psychotherapy.”
5.6.3. PGY-3
Third-year residents attend seminars, conferences, or rounds five mornings
a week. This comprehensive and sophisticated series includes in-depth
exposure to all contemporary forms of psychotherapy (supportive, group
milieu, hypnotherapy, insight-oriented, marital and family, short-term
dynamic, cognitive and integrative psychotherapy), outpatient psychophar-
macology, Axis II disorders, ethics, forensic psychiatry, board preparation,
teaching skills, cross-cultural/diversity issues, and human sexuality.
5.6.4. PGY-4
Fourth-year residents attend advanced-level seminars in transition to pri-
vate practice, history of psychiatry, neurology review, and an advanced
workshop on short-term dynamic psychotherapy. In recent years, an
extensive Part 1 Board Review Course has overshadowed all others in
terms of time, focus, and energy, because residents face the prospects of
passing their examinations in May of their senior year. Senior residents
are also invited to participate with departmental fellows in the advanced
psychopharmacology seminar. Each year, senior residents help develop
their own modification and additions to their senior seminars on the basis
of the recognized needs and unique interests of each class.
5.8. Supervision
Psychiatry residents are typically supervised by many different attendings
during their training. In general, the level of supervision is greatest at the
beginning of the residency and gradually decreases as the resident gains
more knowledge and experience. In many programs, PGY-4 residents will
often supervise their junior colleagues, while still receiving supervision
themselves. Residents at all training levels are required to have at least
2 hrs per week of faculty-level supervision.
On most rotations, clinical supervision is provided by the attending
physicians who work at that clinical site. Usually, those attendings are
ultimately responsible for the care of the patients at that site (medically
and legally). Therefore, they will often work side by side with the resi-
dents at the site and should provide frequent, timely feedback. However,
residents will also typically have “continuity” supervisors, who meet with
them on a weekly basis for several months in a row or even the entire year.
These are often psychiatrists in the community with voluntary faculty
appointments. Most programs will strive to provide residents with well-
balanced outside supervision, such that each resident’s supervisors have
complementary areas of expertise. For example, as resources allow, each
resident may have outside supervisors who are skilled in medication man-
agement and different psychotherapy modalities.
In addition to formal supervision, residents at many programs will be
exposed to psychotherapy in a more experiential manner. For example,
many programs have a resident “process group,” facilitated by a faculty
member, in which residents learn about group process by participating in
a group themselves. Some programs also give residents the opportunity to
receive individual psychotherapy, either at no cost or at significantly
reduced rates.
5.9. Evaluation
Throughout their training, residents undergo frequent, comprehensive
evaluation of their clinical ability and knowledge base. The Psychiatry
RRC guidelines specify that residents must receive formative evaluation
on a regular basis, after each rotation or educational experience. Upon
completion of the program, they must also receive a summative evalua-
tion, summarizing their performance and verifying their competency. The
summative evaluation is maintained in the resident’s permanent file. In
addition, residents themselves are regularly asked to evaluate the program
and individual faculty.
(1) Patient care: “Residents must be able to provide patient care that is
compassionate, appropriate, and effective for the treatment of health
problems and the promotion of health.”
(2) Medical knowledge: “Residents must demonstrate knowledge of
established and evolving biomedical, clinical, epidemiological, and
social-behavioral sciences, as well as the application of this knowl-
edge to patient care.”
(3) Practice based learning and improvement: “Residents must demon-
strate the ability to investigate and evaluate their care of patients, to
appraise and assimilate scientific evidence, and to continuously
improve patient care based on constant self-evaluation and life-long
learning.”
(4) Interpersonal and communication skills: “Residents must demonstrate
interpersonal and communication skills that result in the effective
exchange of information and collaboration with patients, their fami-
lies, and health professionals.”
(5) Professionalism: “Residents must demonstrate a commitment to car-
rying out professional responsibilities and an adherence to ethical
principles.”
(6) System’s based practice: “Residents must demonstrate an awareness
of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care,
as well as the ability to call effectively on other resources in the sys-
tem to provide optimal health care.”
5.11. Psychotherapy
Among the clinical skills psychiatry residents must be competent to pro-
vide are supportive, psychodynamic, and cognitive-behavioral psycho-
therapies to both brief and long-term individual patients. In addition, they
must have exposure to family, couples, group, and other individual evi-
dence-based psychotherapies.
6. AFTER RESIDENCY
Graduating psychiatry residents have a number of options as they begin
their career. Some will opt for further training in a subspecialty field.
Others may choose to remain in an academic setting, either teaching
or conducting research. Most, however, will go into practice in the com-
munity. Here, we present a brief (and by no means comprehensive) look
at several of the options.
• Solo practice: Work alone and handle all needs of their patients.
• Small group practice: Similar to solo practice but with colleagues who
will typically share on-call duties.
Many psychiatrists will practice in more than one of these settings (for
example, splitting time between inpatient and solo practice).
7. CONCLUSIONS
The direction that psychiatry residency training will take in the next dec-
ade and beyond is something of an open question. Psychoanalytic and
psychodynamic thinking dominated the field until the 1980s, and although
these disciplines are still important, the amount of time most training
programs devote to them has decreased dramatically over the last
20 years. In the 1990s, the “Decade of the Brain” gave rise to major
advances in psychopharmacology, genomics, neuroscience, and func-
tional neuro-imaging, all of which continue today and have helped rede-
fine mental illnesses as brain disorders. In line with this explosion of new
understanding, there has been a shift from expert-based psychiatry to
evidence-based psychiatry. Some argue that future psychiatrists will need
a much stronger background in neuroscience and genomics. Yet, even in
an era of technologically driven care (or perhaps because of it), it will be
essential for future psychiatrists to continue to acquire a deep understand-
ing of human behavior and emotion and the interpersonal skills to apply
this knowledge.
REFERENCES
1. ABPN. (2010) American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Available at:
http://www.abpn.com/. Accessed on June 6, 2010.
2. ACGME. (2010) Accredication Council for Graduate Medical Education,
Available at: http://www.acgme.org. Accessed on June 6, 2010.
Chapter 26
1. INTRODUCTION
Neurosciences and psychiatric researches are progressing quickly. On one
hand, this sentence was written so frequently before, raising new hopes
each time a technique was invented providing new possibilities on under-
standing how the brain functions, that scepticism is understandable. On
the other hand, the interest of major neuroscientists around the world, the
increase of funds devoted to this specific topic (although largely below
what is spent in less damaging disorders such as cardiovascular disease
or cancer) and new studies dedicated to psychiatric researches published
in major journals are positive signs. Some of the main lines of progress in
recent years are:
(1) Creation of consensual cognitive tasks that are assessed on the com-
puter (such as with MATRICS).
(2) GWAS technique (genetic studies testing the whole genome in a
single procedure).
(3) Diffusion tensor imaging (imagery devoted to white fibres therefore
tracking the connection between different brain areas).
(4) Nearly lifetime cohorts (such as the Dunedin cohort).
(5) Development of new pharmacological approaches closer to treatment
settings (‘mega trials’) or treatments aiming at specific symptoms and
669
Although all these techniques are paving the way toward progress, the
main advance might be none of these. It might, rather, be using at least
two of these techniques together in the same research and shifting from
translational to integrative biological systems in medicine and research for
psychiatry. Looking with one versus two eyes means a lot, especially
when we still have no biological marker that is clearly differentiating
patients with versus without a psychiatric disorder. This chapter will
present many types of experiences where the use of two techniques clearly
helped to further understand, even a little, the complex functions of the
brain.
2. IMAGERY
Neuro-imaging has helped better understand psychiatric disorders,
especially during development, and better assess drug treatment response.
Brain structures, including volume and organization of grey and white
matters, can be deciphered in a more detailed and precise fashion thanks
to anatomic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a high field of 3
Teslas. Furthermore, direction changes of white fibres can now be
detected with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Functional brain imaging
studies have also revolutionized the way of exploring neural response in
cognitive tasks or in experimental symptom induced situations.
Positron emission tomography (PET) which uses tracers that label
specific molecules, and functional MRI which analyses blood oxygenation
level-dependent (BOLD) signals, have helped to further understand some
of the biological rules of psychiatric disorders, including metabolism and
pharmacological proprieties. A nice example of the importance of this
approach was a research devoted to the complex phenomenon of ‘craving.’
Patients with alcohol dependence who have been through rehabilitation
have indeed acute and dramatic urges to drink alcohol at specific moments.
The exact mechanism of such a relapse risk factor is not well understood,
although craving is usually triggered by moments, situations, or stimuli
previously associated with past drinking habits. One of the treatments that
3. GENETICS
Psychiatric disorders are known to be genetically influenced. This obser-
vation is provided from epidemiological works on monozygotic and dizy-
gotic twins but also adoption and family studies. However, the assumption
that there might be a direct path between genes and complex psychiatric
disorders has not been successful. Genes are shown to have an impact on
most aspects of psychiatric disorders as the effects of heredity are substan-
tial and are estimated to represent 30%–70% of total variation. Nevertheless,
reality in psycho-pathogenesis is probably much more complex involving
the combined action of many environmental factors and gene networks
impacting on brain development and function.10
Association studies test in two populations (the cases, i.e. subjects with
the disease or trait, and the controls, i.e. subjects without the disease or
trait) whether a genetic variant is associated with a disease or trait. An
association is present if a particular allele or genotype is of a frequency
greater than expected on the basis of chance alone in an individual carry-
ing the disease or trait. When a combination of alleles or genetic markers
occurs more or less frequently in a population than expected, this is
known as linkage disequilibrium.24 Association studies may be case-
control based (unrelated subjects) or family-based association designs and
are used in genetics in order to search either the involvement or the locali-
zation of a gene in the risk of certain disorders.
The GWAS use highly efficient genotyping technologies in order to
assay hundreds of thousands single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
spread across the whole genome in a large set of individuals and relate
them to observable traits. Results in GWAS depend on the ability to detect
an association of a SNP that is in linkage disequilibrium with a predispos-
ing gene variant. This implies that variants need to be in great enough
frequency for detection.4 GWAS have rapidly become a “disease gene
discovery method,” provide precious preliminary genetic information, and
they increase the chances of identifying genes, alleles (and therefore
pathophysiologic mechanisms) for deeper investigations.4,22,23
GWAS require sufficiently large samples from populations in order to
provide sufficient statistical power to identify associations in common
variants. Large study samples have been made possible thanks to productive
4. COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS
There are many standardized evaluation tools of cognitive impairment
in psychiatric disorders. Although there is no golden standard in neuro-
cognitive evaluation, constant scientific evaluations of measures try to deter-
mine which tests (among more than 90) are the most test–retest reliable,
valid when used as a repeated measure, practical and tolerable for patients.21
Tasks evaluate several cognitive domains such as speed of processing,
attention and vigilance, working memory, verbal learning and memory, vis-
ual learning and memory, motor response, inhibition, reasoning and problem
solving, and social cognition. Such tests are of particular interest in nearly all
psychiatric diseases, as constituting potential intermediate phenotypes
(sometimes entitled endophenotypes) between the initial biological defect
and the resulting complex phenotype known as a psychiatric disease).
Experts recommend the use in schizophrenia of a battery of tests
including the Trail Making Test, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, the
Wechsler Memory Scale, or the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test. The
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is the result of thorough exami-
nation, and is now considered as a standard, at least for schizophrenia,
helping studies to spread comparable results in the scientific community.
of individuals who are alike in many ways but differ by a certain charac-
teristic. These medical records are compared for a particular outcome.
Two groups are established: exposed (1) versus non-exposed (2). Exposure,
latent period, and subsequent development of disease have already
occurred. These researches are greatly less time-consuming and less
costly, but are exposed to a large series of biases such as retrospective
assessments (less accurate), selection biases (patients are usually recruited
through care systems to which all patients do not have access), survival
rates of the disorder (surviving patients of a disorder with a high mortality
rate are not representative).
A prospective cohort study is a medical research in which the
investigator follows over time groups of individuals, assessing at baseline
the subjects with versus without the analyzed risk factor. Follow-up looks
for the occurrence of a disease in the different subgroups in relation to the
exposition to a particular risk. This kind of study is time-consuming and
costly, but it is more scientifically valued.
Many questions arise when considering recruitment of control, or unex-
posed, subjects. Should controls be chosen in a restricted fashion, thus
pushing away from real life conditions? In order to allow comparison, a
reference group must come from a source population from which cases
originate. This allows a possible representativity of the source population,
thus permitting analysis of data. Controls should share similar exclusion
and restriction criteria as cases do, be identified as non-cases and have
been susceptible to have been exposed or developed disease. At best, con-
trol patients should be a random sample of source population. However,
this is not always feasible and often controls are matched according to
several important criteria (such as age and sex), or originate from a spe-
cific subpopulation of the source population (such as friends or
neighborhoods).
7. PHARMACOLOGY
Clinical trials can be classified in observational studies in which there is
no active investigator management and interventional studies in which the
investigators actively compare two treatments (usually a new treatment is
compared to a standard treatment or placebo).
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), which are interventional studies,
have been the gold standard in the evaluation of psychiatric treatments.
These studies are designed as randomized, double blind, and placebo-
controlled and provide information concerning treatment efficacy of a
given treatment under best possible control of all other involved parame-
ters apart from the presence of a product with known biological activity.
experience. Experience often proves that patients with the same diagnosis
respond in an uncertain fashion to a given treatment.
The FKBP5 gene, a gene coding for a glucocorticoid receptor-regulating
co-chaperone protein, could be one of the first genes useful to predict
antidepressant response. Initially, this gene was found associated with
treatment response in two independent German samples of depressed
inpatients.2 Individuals carrying the associated genotypes had less HPA-
axis hyperactivity during the depressive episode, which implies that the
studied SNP might have functional impact. As the association has now
been replicated at least three times to this day, including in the large
STAR*D sample, then testing this gene might be helpful for clinicians.
For such use, many gaps have to be fulfilled. What type of prediction is
related to the knowledge of these genotypes? How can this information be
used, regarding the numerous other factors that are involved, such as
presence of co-prescription, heterogeneity of the disorder, and social
background specificities? But complexity does not mean that it is impos-
sible to clearly demonstrate, it only implies that many factors are involved.
Research has yet to be pursued, and its pursuit will now have more
possibilities to decipher the involved mechanisms thanks to the use of
more complex approaches, i.e. using different types of techniques.
REFERENCES
1. Anguelova M, et al. (2003) A systematic review of association studies inves-
tigating genes coding for serotonin receptors and the serotonin transporter:
II. Suicidal behavior. Mol Psychiatry 8: 646.
2. Binder EB, et al. (2004) Polymorphisms in FKBP5 are associated with
increased recurrence of depressive episodes and rapid response to antidepres-
sant treatment. Nat Genet 36: 1319–1325.
3. Buckholtz J, Treadway MT, Cowan RL, Woodward ND, Benning SD, Li R,
Sib Ansari M, Baldwin RM, Schwartzman AN, Shelby ES, Smith CE, Cole D,
Kessler RM, Zald DH. (2010) Mesolimbic dopamine reward system hyper-
sensitivity in individuals with psychopathic traits. Nat Neurosci 13: 419–420.
4. Cantor RM, Lange K, Sinsheimer JS. (2010) Prioritizing GWAS results:
A review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application.
Am J Hum Genet 86: 6–22.
18. Lin PY, Tsai G. (2004) Association between serotonin transporter gene
promoter polymorphism and suicide: Results of a meta-analysis. Biol
Psychiatry 15: 1023.
19. Minzenberg MJ, Laird AR, Thelen S, Carter CS, Glahn DC. (2009) Meta-
analysis of 41 functional neuroimaging studies of executive function in
schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66: 811–822.
20. Moskvina V, Craddock N, Holmans P, Nikolov I, Pahwa JS, Green E,
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC.
(2009) Gene-wide analyses of genome-wide association data sets: Evidence
for multiple common risk alleles for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and
for overlap in genetic risk. Mol Psychiatry 14: 252–260.
21. Nuechterlein KH, et al. (2008) The matrics consensus cognitive battery, part
1: Test selection, reliability and validity. Am J Psychiatry 165: 203–213.
22. O’Donovan MC, et al. (2008) Identification of loci associated with schizo-
phrenia by genome-wide association and follow-up. Nat Genetics 9:
1053–1055.
23. Pearson TA, Manolio TA. (2008) How to interpret a genome-wide association
study. JAMA 299: 35–50.
24. Ramoz N, Gorwood P. (2007) Neurobehavioral genetics: The role of asso-
ciation studies in psychiatric disorders. In: Jones B, Mormède P (eds.),
Neurobehavioral Genetics: Methods and Applications. pp. 169–182, CRC
Press.
25. Risch N, et al. (2009) Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene
(5-HTTLPR), stressful life events and risk of depression. Meta-analysis.
JAMA 301: 2462–2474.
26. Rush AJ, et al. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression
(STAR*D): Rationale and design. Controlled Clin Trials 25: 119–142.
27. Rutter M. (2010) Gene-environment interplay. Depression Anxiety 27: 1–4.
28. Rutter M. (2005) How the environment affects mental health. Br J Psychiatry
186: 4–6.
29. The Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Steering Committee. (2009) A frame-
work for interpreting genome-wide association studies of psychiatric
disorders. Mol Psychiatry 14: 10–17.
30. Torrey EF, Bartko JJ, Lun ZR, Yolken RH. (2007) Antibodies to Toxoplasma
gondii in patients with schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 33:
729–736.
Chapter 27
World Suicide
Morton M. Silverman
1. INTRODUCTION
Every year, a million individuals die by suicide and at least twenty times
as many attempt suicide, making suicide and suicidal behaviors a major
international public health problem and challenge. This toll is higher than
the total number of world deaths each year from war and homicide com-
bined. On average, almost 3,000 people die by suicide every day. Every
30 secs, the loss of a loved one to suicide shatters the lives of family and
friends. For family and friends affected by suicide or attempted suicide,
the emotional impact may last for many years.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 1998, suicide
represented 1.8% of the global burden of disease, and it is expected to
increase to 2.4% by the year 2020. Suicide is presently among the ten
leading causes of death for all ages in most countries, and in some coun-
tries, it is among the top three causes of death for those aged 15–34 years.
In the last 45 years, suicide rates have increased by 6% worldwide.
Suicide is among the three leading causes of death among those aged
15–44 years in some countries, and the second leading cause of death in
the 10–24 years age group; these figures do not include suicide attempts,
which are up to 20 times more frequent than completed suicide.
Substantial economic costs are associated with suicide. These costs
arise from the loss of economic potential due to lives lost to suicide, from
690
2. RISK FACTORS
Understanding risk and protective factors at the individual, family, com-
munity, societal, and national levels is necessary in order to identify
those at most risk, intervene in a timely and effective manner, and
implement preventive interventions. Many different populations are at
risk for suicide and suicidal behaviors, highlighting the diversity of
biopsychosocial factors that contribute to self-destructive behaviors:
age, gender, race/ethnicity, geographical location, socioeconomic
upheavals, presence of physical illness, presence of mental disorders
(especially affective disorders, substance abuse disorders, anxiety
disorders, psychotic disorders, and certain personality disorders), and
ruptures in interpersonal relationships leading to isolation, loneliness,
and rejection.
692 M. M. Silverman
Major risk factors include gender, race, ethnicity, culture, access and
availability of lethal means, physical and sexual abuse, sexual orienta-
tion, violence, and loss. Mental disorders (particularly depression and
alcohol use disorders) are a major risk factor for suicide in Europe and
North America; however, in Asian countries, impulsiveness plays an
important role.
Risk for suicide is only partly dependent upon the presence of a psychi-
atric disorder and/or physical illness, because the majority of individuals
suffering from psychiatric and physical illnesses do not kill themselves as
a result of their illnesses. Apart from demographic factors (such as gender
and age, which will be discussed separately below), significant risk factors
consist of a combination and interaction between and among psychiatric,
biological, social, cultural, and environmental factors, as well as factors
related to an individual’s life history.
Certain life events may serve as precipitating factors for suicidal
behavior. Such events include personal loss, interpersonal conflict, social
isolation, a broken or disturbed relationship, and legal or work-related
difficulties.25
Within countries, the prevalence of suicide among Caucasians is
approximately twice that observed in other races, although an increasing
rate among African Americans has recently been reported in the United
States.23
One of the challenges is not only to identify the presence of risk factors
but also to develop and appropriately implement preventive interventions.
Knowing which individuals possess a predisposition to suicide, and also
possibly face a combination of risk factors, can help identify those most
in need of therapeutic and preventive interventions.
It is clear that suicide prevention requires intervention also from
outside the health sector and calls for an innovative, comprehensive
approach, including both health and non-health sectors, such as education,
labor, police, justice, religion, law, politics, and the media.
3. PROTECTIVE FACTORS
Compared to our knowledge about predisposing and precipitating risk
factors, we know relatively little about protective factors, especially on a
global level. Generally, the following factors have been identified: strong
religious orientation, social support and connectedness (including
marriage), parenthood, self-esteem, emotional well-being, and economic
stability.
4. SUICIDE ATTEMPTS
Internationally, the ratio of suicide attempts to death by suicide is
generally estimated at 20–30 to 1 in adolescents and young adults and 3
or less to 1 in the elderly population. Suicide attempts range in intent and
medical severity from mild to very severe, often resulting in the individual
being disabled by the psychological, physical, social, and interpersonal
consequences of their self-injurious behavior.
Suicide and suicide attempts have serious emotional consequences as
well for families, peers, and significant others. The families of those who
attempt suicide are often especially anxious and concerned about the risk
of further suicidal behavior and about their responsibilities in trying to
prevent further attempts.
Very few countries in the world have systematic data registration of
attempted suicide, which makes it impossible to relate national trends of
suicide to national trends of attempted suicide. In fact, very few states
within the United States collect such data. Two of the very real obstacles
to collecting such data are that the majority of suicide attempters never
come to the attention of medical facilities, and there is no uniform defini-
tion for suicide attempts within countries, let alone across the globe. In
addition, in many developing countries, attempted suicide remains a
punishable offense; therefore many hospitals do not register cases.
Furthermore, in many locales, injuries do not need to be officially
reported, so information on injuries is consequently not collected at any
level of government. Hence, reported cases of attempted suicide are only
the “tip of the iceberg,” resulting in the large majority of suicidal people
remaining uncounted.16
What is known is that non-fatal suicidal behavior is more prevalent
among younger people than among older people. The ratio of fatal to non-
fatal self-injurious behavior (with and without suicidal intent) in those
over the age of 65 years is usually estimated to be 1:2–3, while in young
694 M. M. Silverman
people under the age of 25 years the ratio may approach 1:100–200.26
Although suicidal behavior is less frequent in the elderly, the probability
of a fatal outcome is much higher. As a general trend, rates of non-fatal
suicidal behavior tend to be 2–3 times higher in women than in men.
Results from the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study of Parasuicide indicate
that the most common method of suicide attempts used by men and
women is poisoning, followed by cutting. More than half of those
attempting suicide made more than one attempt, with nearly 20% of
second attempts being made within 12 months of the first.30
One approach to understanding why individuals choose to end their
own lives is to construct a chain of causation and study each element’s
contribution to the suicidal process. It is generally accepted that, in most
cases, but not all, a suicidal act is preceded by some form of suicidal plan-
ning and that planning is the result of a thinking process that involves a
desire or intent to die. The sequence usually begins with a suicidal thought
(ideation), followed by suicidal intent, suicidal planning, and finally a
self-injurious act, which may result in a fatal or non-fatal outcome.7
However, and most important, the majority of suicidal thoughts will never
end in a suicidal act.
Three lines of research have dominated the suicide field: retrospective
studies of those who have died by suicide, retrospective (and subsequent
prospective) studies of those who attempt suicide, and studies of those
who have suicidal thoughts. Many researchers have looked upon suicide
attempts as the best available “proxy measure” for suicide completions,
although there is not a one-to-one relationship between these two behav-
iors. Inasmuch as we cannot interview the dead, many believe that
studying suicide attempters will provide a window into the suicidal mind,
inasmuch as about 10%–20% of those who attempt suicide will eventually
die by suicide and an even higher percent will repeat suicidal attempts.
696 M. M. Silverman
less regular basis, while very few countries in Africa report mortality
regularly.6 Some of the 70 least developed countries (mostly in Africa,
but also in South East Asia) do not maintain vital registration systems
due to the lack of means to collect and process data related to births and
deaths in the general population.
Using both reported and estimated data (for countries that do not report
to the WHO on mortality), the estimated number of individual cases of
suicide in 2002 (the last year for which there are reliable reported data)
was about 877,000 cases, of which 549,000 were males and 328,000
females, which gives a proportion of 1.7:1 (Table 1).6 According to WHO
estimates for the year 2020, approximately 1.53 million people will die by
suicide, and 10–20 times more people than this will attempt suicide
worldwide. This represents, on average, one death every 20 secs and one
attempt every 1–2 secs.5
However, total numbers do not tell the whole story, because national
suicide rates provide a better measure of the suicide activity within a
country. The WHO estimates that the global suicide rate is 14/100,000, of
which 18/100,000 is the male rate and 11/100,000 is the female rate.
Based on the most recent data sent to the WHO, the highest suicide rates
for both males and females are found in Europe, predominantly in Eastern
Europe (i.e. Lithuania, the Russian Federation, Belarus, and, to a lesser
extent, Finland, Hungary, and Latvia), among a group of countries that
share similar historical, genetic, and sociocultural characteristics. However,
some countries that are quite distinct in relation to each other also have
some similarly high suicide rates, i.e. Cuba, Japan, and Sri Lanka.
During the 20th century, Finland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway,
Scotland, Spain, and Sweden experienced a significant increase in
suicides, while England and Wales (combined data), Italy, New Zealand,
and Switzerland experienced a significant decrease.24 During the period
between 1960 and 1990, at least 28 countries or territories had rising sui-
cide rates, including Bulgaria, China, Costa Rica, Mauritius, and
Singapore, while eight had declining rates, including Australia and
England and Wales (combined data). In the last 45 years, suicide rates
have increased by 60% in some countries.
Interestingly, when the data are separated into WHO geographical
regions, the highest rates in each region (with the exception of Europe) are
698 M. M. Silverman
Table 1. (Continued)
Country Year Males Females
France 06 25.5 9.0
Georgia 01 3.4 1.1
Germany 06 17.9 6.0
Greece 06 5.9 1.2
Grenada 05 9.8 1.9
Guatemala 06 3.6 1.1
Guyana 05 33.8 11.6
Haiti 03 0.0 0.0
Honduras 78 0.0 0.0
Hungary 05 42.3 11.2
Iceland 07 18.9 4.6
India 98 12.2 9.1
Iran 91 0.3 0.1
Ireland 07 17.4 3.8
Israel 05 8.7 3.3
Italy 06 9.9 2.8
Jamaica 90 0.3 0.0
Japan 07 35.8 13.7
Jordan 79 0.0 0.0
Kazakhstan 07 46.2 9.0
Kuwait 02 2.5 1.4
Kyrgyzstan 06 14.4 3.7
Latvia 07 34.1 7.7
Lithuania 07 53.9 9.8
Luxembourg 05 17.7 4.3
Maldives 05 0.7 0.0
Malta 07 12.3 0.5
Mauritius 07 16.0 4.8
Mexico 06 6.8 1.3
Netherlands 07 11.6 5.0
New Zealand 05 18.9 6.3
Nicaragua 05 11.1 3.3
Norway 06 16.8 6.0
Panama 06 10.4 0.8
Paraguay 04 5.5 2.7
Peru 00 1.1 0.6
(Continued)
Table 1. (Continued)
Country Year Males Females
Philippines 93 2.5 1.7
Poland 06 26.8 4.4
Portugal 04 17.9 5.5
Puerto Rico 05 13.2 2.0
Republic of Korea 06 29.6 14.1
Republic of Moldova 07 28.0 4.3
Romania 07 18.9 4.0
Russian Federation 06 53.9 9.5
Saint Kitts and Nevis 95 0.0 0.0
Saint Lucia 02 10.4 5.0
Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines 04 7.3 0.0
Sao Tome and Principe 87 0.0 1.8
Serbia 06 28.4 11.1
Seychelles 87 9.1 0.0
Singapore 06 12.9 7.7
Slovakia 05 22.3 3.4
Slovenia 07 33.7 9.7
Spain 05 12.0 3.8
Sri Lanka 91 44.6 16.8
Suriname 05 23.9 4.8
Sweden 06 18.1 8.3
Switzerland 06 23.5 11.7
Syrian Arab Republic 85 0.2 0.0
Tajikistan 01 2.9 2.3
Thailand 02 12.0 3.8
Tfyr Macedonia 03 9.5 4.0
Trinidad and Tobago 02 20.4 4.0
Turkmenistan 98 13.8 3.5
Ukraine 05 40.9 7.0
United Kingdom 07 10.1 2.8
United States of America 05 17.7 4.5
Uruguay 04 26.0 6.3
Uzbekistan 05 7.0 2.3
Venezuela 05 6.1 1.4
Zimbabwe 90 10.6 5.2
Suicide rates per 100,000 by country, year, and sex Most recent year available; as of 2009.
700 M. M. Silverman
found in island countries, such as Cuba, Japan, Mauritius, and Sri Lanka.
The lowest suicide rates are found in countries that primarily follow
Islamic traditions and in some Central Asian republics that had formerly
been integrated into the Soviet Union.6 A cautionary note is that it is
difficult to compare rates across regions and countries because of impor-
tant differences in ethnic and sociopolitical features. For example,
although the highest suicide rates are currently found in Eastern Europe,
the largest number of suicides occurs in Asia. Of the total number of sui-
cides worldwide, approximately 46% take place in the top 13 countries
listed in Table 2, while the top 13 countries in terms of suicide rates
(Table 3) represent less than 14% of worldwide suicides. Only two
countries — the Russian Federation and Sri Lanka — are among the top
13 countries for both suicide rate and number of cases of suicide.
Of particular note is that almost one-third of all suicides worldwide
occur in China and India. By way of comparison, the number of suicides
in China alone is 30% greater than the total number of suicides in the
whole of Europe, and the number of suicides in India is equivalent to
those in the four European countries, with the highest number of suicides
together (Russia, Germany, France, and Ukraine). Yet, the suicide rate in
China almost parallels the global average rate, and that of India is almost
half of the global suicide rate.
7. ACCESS TO MEANS
Our knowledge of the methods used and their variation across countries
and world regions is very limited. Ajdacic-Gross et al.,1 using ICD-10
data, were able to identify typical patterns of suicide methods in different
countries. Hanging was the predominant method of suicide in most coun-
tries. The highest proportion was around 90% in men and 80% in women,
as observed in Eastern Europe (i.e. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and
Romania). Poisoning by pesticide, especially among women, was com-
mon in many Asian countries (e.g. the Republic of Korea and Thailand)
and in rural Latin American countries (e.g. El Salvador, Nicaragua, and
Peru), as well as in Portugal. Poisoning by drugs was common in women
and men in Canada, the Nordic countries, and the United Kingdom.
702 M. M. Silverman
Firearm suicide was the most common method in the United States but
was also prevalent in Argentina, Switzerland, and Uruguay. Jumping from
a high place in cities and urban societies was the most common method in
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China, Luxembourg,
and Malta. In addition, there has been an emergence of a new method,
charcoal-burning suicide, in Hong Kong SAR, China, and urban Taiwan,
China.12
Adjacic-Gross et al.’s analyses showed that pesticide suicide and
firearm suicide have replaced more traditional methods in many countries.
Violent and highly lethal methods such as firearm suicide and hanging are
more frequent among men, whereas poisoning or drowning are more fre-
quent among women. The lethality of firearm suicide and hanging
approaches 80%–90%, but lethality is markedly lower for poisoning.32
Three methods — hanging, pesticide suicide, and firearm suicide —
dominate country-specific suicide patterns. Jumping from a height and
non-pesticide poisoning (i.e. mainly poisoning by drugs) occasionally
appear as important alternative methods. Hanging is the main suicide
method when no other major method is available. The proportion of
hangings typically decreases as either pesticide suicide or firearm suicide
increases.
With regard to poisoning and firearm suicide, Adjacic-Gross et al.’s
analyses suggest that preventive efforts are likely to have the greatest
impact on the subgroup that carry out unplanned impulsive acts. Perhaps
20%–30% of all suicides in industrialized countries belong to this
subgroup, and their deaths might be preventable. They concluded that
although numerous factors contributed to the choice of a suicide method,
societal patterns of suicide could be understood from basic concepts such
as the social acceptability of the method (i.e. culture and tradition) and its
availability (i.e. opportunity). This suggests that restricting access to the
means of suicide would be a major form of suicide prevention globally.
many as 300,000 deaths each year.9 It is the major method of suicide and
suicide attempts among young rural women in China.29 Preventive actions
undertaken by the WHO, in collaboration with other international health
and public health organizations, include changing attitudes, knowledge,
and beliefs about pesticides; controlling access to pesticides (including
developing secure storage practices); and training primary health care
personnel (including doctors and nursing staff at emergency care units) in
the clinical management of such intoxications.10
On average, there are about three male suicides for every female
suicide, and this is so more or less consistently for different age groups,
with the exception of advanced age groups, when men tend to have even
higher rates. An increase of approximately 49% for suicide rates for males
and 33% for suicide rates for females occurred between 1950 (when the
first worldwide suicide rate calculations were done, with 21 countries
reporting) and 1995 (the last year of full data collection, with 105 coun-
tries reporting). There is a relatively constant predominance of male
suicide rates over female suicide rates over the last 60 years: 3.2:1 in
1950; 3.6:1 in 1995; and projected to be 3.9:1 in 2020. China is the only
exception to this finding, where female suicide rates are slightly higher
than male suicide rates.
704 M. M. Silverman
Suicide rates among young people have been increasing, and they are
currently the group with the highest risk in one third of all countries
(developed and developing). At least 100,000 adolescents die by suicide
every year. This is a remarkable change from just 50 years ago, when the
absolute number of cases of suicide roughly increased with age. It is not
explained in terms of the overall aging of the global population; in fact, it
runs counter to this demographic trend. Although the proportion of the
elderly in the total global population is increasing at a greater pace than
that of younger people, the suicide rate in young people is increasing at a
greater rate than it is in the elderly. This phenomenon appears to exist in
all continents and is not correlated to levels of industrialization or wealth.23
706 M. M. Silverman
708 M. M. Silverman
the expression of suicidal behaviors, the reasoning has been that the
successful treatment of these disorders should result in the reduction of
suicidal behaviors among those with these disorders. In theory this is quite
reasonable and eminently testable. However, there are many obstacles to
showing a cause-and-effect relationship. Among them are the following:
(1) Suicide and suicidal behaviors are low base-rate behaviors, even
amongst those with psychiatric illnesses.
(2) Patients do not always comply with medication regimens as pre-
scribed, so it is not uncommon for patients to have sub-threshold or
sub-therapeutic blood levels of medications.
(3) Even when patients take medications at prescribed therapeutic levels,
they may not have relief of symptoms.
(4) Psychotropic medications are prescribed for multiple disorders and
dysfunctions, so inferring diagnoses and prescribing patterns from
national, regional, or large pharmaceutical data bases may not be true
indications of their use.
(5) It is difficult to extrapolate findings from a clinical population to a
general population.
Nevertheless, over the last five years, there have been an increasing
number of international studies that have suggested that the use of specific
medications for the treatment of specific mental disorders is associated
with a reduction in suicidal behaviors in those clinical populations receiv-
ing certain medications. Space precludes me from reviewing the literature
here; however, definitive studies exist for the use of clozapine to prevent
suicide attempts in the treatment of schizophrenia27 and the use of lithium
to prevent suicide in the treatment of bipolar disorder.2
710 M. M. Silverman
14. RECOMMENDATIONS
Several important recommendations for reducing both fatal and non-fatal
suicidal behavior were developed at an international conference on violence
and health sponsored by the WHO in 2002, and although progress has
been made on some of these recommendations, they remain as relevant
today as they were when they were initially formulated.23
712 M. M. Silverman
714 M. M. Silverman
15. CONCLUSIONS
Suicide is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and is recognized
as a major public health problem. Suicide and attempted suicide are com-
plex phenomena that arise, in very individualistic ways, from the interplay
of biological, psychological, psychiatric, and social factors. The complex-
ity of causes necessarily requires a multifaceted approach to prevention
that takes into account cultural context. Cultural factors play a major role
in suicidal behavior,13 producing large differences in the characteristics of
this problem around the world.30 Given these differences, what has a
positive effect in preventing suicide in one location may be ineffective or
even counterproductive in another cultural setting.
Global figures and statistics about suicide and suicide attempts provide
a broad view of the scope of the problem, especially as it relates to other
causes of morbidity and mortality. However, these numbers and rates
mask important regional, national, and local characteristics. Therefore,
although we need to think globally to prevent suicide, we must act locally.
If governments commit to defining national responses to prevent suicide
among all ages, huge progress can be made. If we build networks and alli-
ances to promote common approaches that support governments in plan-
ning and implementing their national responses, we will find that suicide
is a huge but largely preventable public health problem.
Major investment is needed, both for research and for preventive
efforts. While short-term efforts contribute to an understanding of why
suicide occurs and what can be done to prevent it, longitudinal research
studies are necessary to fully understand the role of biological, psychoso-
cial, and environmental factors in suicide. There is also a great need for
rigorous and long-term evaluations of interventions. To date, most pro-
jects have been of short duration with little, if any, evaluation. Finally,
suicide prevention efforts will be ineffective if they are not set within the
framework of large-scale plans developed by multidisciplinary teams,
comprising government officials, health care planners and health care
workers, and researchers and practitioners from a variety of disciplines
and sectors. Major investments in planning, resources, and collaboration
between these groups will go a long way toward reducing this important
international public health problem.
716 M. M. Silverman
17. SELF-ASSESSMENT
17.1. You have just been asked to serve as a medical consultant
to the new Deputy Minister of Health for a developing
country whose major economic resource is agriculture.
You have been asked to consult on the suicide problem
in this country. The Deputy Minister of Health wants a
solution to the problem as fast as possible and has asked
you for your best advice as to how to lower the suicide rates
in the next 12 months.
Before you agree to accept this consultation, you ask the
Deputy Minister of Health for which of the following
information:
(A) Suicide rates by age, gender, race, and geographical location by year
for the last 10 years.
(B) Death rates by all causes by year for the last 10 years.
(C) The manner of death by suicide by year for the last 10 years.
(D) The number and location of hospitals throughout the country.
(E) The number, level of training, and location of medical personnel
throughout the country.
718 M. M. Silverman
(A) Educate the patient about his drinking, and refer him to a substance
abuse counselor for a follow-up appointment.
(B) Educate the patient about his drinking, and refer him to a marital
therapy counselor for a follow-up appointment.
(C) Ask the patient if he has ever had any similar episodes such as this one
in his past.
(D) Ask the patient if he would voluntarily sign in to the inpatient psychi-
atric unit.
(E) Ask the patient if there is anyone he could stay with for the next few
days.
REFERENCES
1. Adjacic-Gross V, Weiss MG, Ring M, Hepp U, Bopp M, Gutzwiller F,
Rossler W. (2008) Methods of suicide: International suicide patterns derived
from the WHO mortality database. Bull WHO 86(9): 726–732.
2. Baldessarini RJ, Tondo L, Davis P, Pompili M, Goodwin FK, Hennen J.
(2006) Decreased suicidal risk during long-term lithium treatment: Meta-
analysis. Bipolar Disord 8: 625–639.
3. Baldesssari RJ, Pompilli M, Tondo L. (2006) Suicidal risk in antidepressant
trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63: 246–248.
4. Beautrais AL, Joyce PR, Mulder RT, Fergusson DM, Deavoll BJ, et al. (1996)
Prevalence and comorbidity of mental disorders in persons making serious
suicide attempts: A case-control study. Am J Psychiatry 153: 1009–1014.
5. Bertolote JM. (2001) Suicide in the world: An epidemiological overview,
11995–2000. In: Wasserman D (ed.), Suicide: An Unnecessary Death,
pp. 3–10, Martin Dunitz, London.
720 M. M. Silverman
722 M. M. Silverman
Chapter 28
AIDS Psychiatry
723
724 M. A. Cohen
More than 25 million people have died of AIDS since 1981. Around
half of persons with HIV are women and half become infected before
age 25 years of age making AIDS the second most common cause of death
among 20–24 year olds. As of 2008, the AIDS pandemic had left behind
15 million AIDS orphans throughout the world. Ironically, while the
global rate of new HIV infections has decreased from 5.3 million in 2002
to 2.7 million in 2008, in the United States, the incidence of new infec-
tions rose from 40,000 in 2002 to 55,000 in 2008. The majority of persons
living with HIV and AIDS are living in developing countries where access
to medical care and antiretroviral therapy is inadequate. While sub-
Saharan Africa has only 10% of the world’s population, it has 67% of all
persons living with HIV. Asia and Eastern Europe also have rapidly grow-
ing AIDS epidemics. Global estimates suggest that while 9.5 million
persons with AIDS need antiretroviral therapy, only 4 million or 42% have
access to treatment. AIDS is unique among severe and complex illnesses
in that it is entirely preventable. The primary mode of HIV transmission
throughout the world is sexual transmission and is preventable with bar-
rier contraception. The second most common mode of transmission is
from injecting drug use although use of other substances can lead to sex-
ual coercion and unprotected sex. Gender-based violence throughout
the world results in rape, sexual coercion, and childhood sexual abuse.
The “Virgin Cure” myth of AIDS prevention and treatment is likely to be
responsible for the rape of infants and babies in very few areas of the
world. However, incest, childhood sexual enslavement, and childhood
sexual abuse are responsible for severe trauma as well as HIV transmis-
sion in many areas of the world. Disparities in the prevention, diagnosis,
and treatment of HIV infection are tragic and multidimensional. These
disparities are based on social, cultural, economic, and political as well as
psychiatric factors.
Substance use disorders as well as many other psychiatric disorders are
major vectors of HIV transmission worldwide. Injecting drug use and sex
work complicate and perpetuate the HIV pandemic. Alcohol and other
drug use lead to intoxication, inappropriate partner choice, violent and
coercive sexual behaviors, and lack of use of barrier contraception.
Sharing of needles and other drug paraphernalia are also instrumental in
direct HIV transmission. The exchange of sex for drugs leads to HIV
726 M. A. Cohen
728 M. A. Cohen
Table 1. How AIDS differs from most other severe and complex medical illnesses.
Pathophysiology
Infectious etiology
Modes of transmission: unsafe sex, sharing of needles in injecting drug use, perinatal
Public Health Implications
AIDS is preventable and contagious
Disinhibition induced by HIV-associated dementia, substance use, or other psychiatric
disorders can lead to HIV, HBV, HCV, and STD transmission
Recognition and treatment of psychiatric disorders can prevent HIV transmission as well
as AIDS progression and ameliorate suffering throughout the course of illness
Unique Issues
AIDS stigma and discrimination or AIDSism5
Age of onset from birth to old age
Treatment, stabilization, or prevention with antiretrovirals is possible
Exacerbation by treatment with antiretrovirals can occur — IRIS4
Multiple infections and complex medical multimorbidities
Complex psychiatric multimorbidities
High prevalence of psychiatric disorders including substance use and its consequences
High prevalence of delirium due to infectious, respiratory, cardiac, metabolic illnesses
High prevalence of delirium due to end-stage renal and liver disease
High prevalence of HIV-associated dementia
HIV is the most frequent cause of treatable dementia in persons under 501
Unique neurological deficits, paresis, paralysis, pain, and behavioral manifestations
medical settings. Persons with HIV and AIDS at different stages of illness
and different ages are represented.
730 M. A. Cohen
Medical causes
Infectious
• Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinopathy
• Sepsis
• Fungemia
• Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)
Neurologic causes
• Space-occupying lesions of brain: CNS lymphomas, toxoplasmosis, PML
• Seizures: Ictal, interictal, and postictal states
Psychiatric causes
Substance use disorders
• Alcohol withdrawal
• Benzodiazepine withdrawal
• Hallucinogens
• Amphetamine and other stimulants
Delirium
Toxic or drug-induced delirium
• Intoxication: Sedative-hypnotics, alcoholic hallucinosis, opiates
• Drugs: Antibiotics, anticholinergics, anticonvulsants, antineoplastic drugs,
antiretrovirals, ketamine, lithium, narcotic analgesics
• Withdrawal: Alcohol, sedative-hypnotics
Metabolic encephalopathy
• Hypoxia
• Hepatic, renal, pulmonary, pancreatic insufficiency
• Hypoglycemia
Disorders of fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance
• Dehydration
• Lactic acidosis (secondary to antiretroviral treatment)
• Hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, alkalosis, acidosis
Endocrine disorders
• Hypothyroidism
• Pancreatitis and diabetes mellitus
Infections
• Systemic: Bacteremia, septicemia, infective endocarditis, bacterial pneumonia,
Pneumocystis jerovici pneumonia, cryptococcal pneumonia
(Continued)
Table 2. (Continued)
• Herpes zoster
• Disseminated Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex
• Disseminated candidiasis
• Intracranial: Cryptococcal meningitis, HIV encephalitis, tuberculous meningitis,
toxoplasmosis
Malnutrition and Vitamin deficiency
• Protein energy undernutrition
• Vitamin B12 deficiency
• Thiamine deficiency and Wernicke’s encephalopathy
• Wasting and failure to thrive
Neoplastic
• Space-occupying lesions: CNS lymphoma, CNS metastases, cryptococoma,
toxoplasmosis
• Paraneoplastic syndromes associated with lung and other neoplasms
Neurologic
• Seizures: Ictal, interictal, postictal states
• Head trauma
• Space-occupying lesions of brain: CNS lymphomas, toxoplasmosis, CMV infection,
abscesses, cryptococcoma
Hypoxia
• Pneumocystis jerovici pneumonia
• Pulmonary hypertension
• Cardiomyopathy
• Coronary artery disease
• End-stage pulmonary disease
• Anemia
Psychotic Disorders
• Schizophrenia
• Schizoaffective disorder
Mood Disorders
• Major depressive disorder with psychotic features
• Mania
Anxiety Disorders
• Posttraumatic Stress Disorder with Psychotic Features
732 M. A. Cohen
4.2. Delirium
Delirium is prevalent in acute as well as long-term care settings and is
also a highly prevalent diagnosis in persons with HIV and AIDS.
Establishing the cause of delirium is complicated by both HIV-related
medical conditions as well as multimorbid medical conditions and their
treatments.
734 M. A. Cohen
8. TREATMENT ISSUES
8.1. Psychotherapeutic modalities
AIDS is a severe and complex medical and psychiatric illness that responds
best to psychotherapeutic treatments. The pill burden imposed by multi-
morbid medical conditions in addition those associated with HIV mitigates
against adding additional medications and can complicate the regimen by
altering levels of antiretrovirals. There is a growing evidence base that
illustrates the importance of these modalities including support groups,16,18
and psychotherapy.3 Choice of therapy from cognitive behavioral to
psychoanalytic and psychodynamic psychotherapy needs to be tailored to
the needs of individuals, couples, and families coping with AIDS.
The full range of psychotherapeutic and other therapeutic modalities
are relevant in persons with HIV and AIDS:
736 M. A. Cohen
• Spiritual support.
• Relaxation response.
9. CONCLUSION
Understanding AIDS psychiatry can help HIV clinicians prevent transmis-
sion of HIV and AIDSism, can improve adherence to medical care, and
diminish suffering, morbidity and mortality in persons with HIV and
AIDS.
738 M. A. Cohen
11. SELF-ASSESSMENT
11.1. What is the differential diagnosis of new-onset visual
hallucinations in a person with late-stage AIDS?
(A) Delirium.
(B) Substance use disorder.
(C) Psychosis.
(D) Medical conditions or their treatments.
(E) All of the above.
740 M. A. Cohen
742 M. A. Cohen
12.4. Delirium
Mr D is a 68-year-old married disabled attorney admitted with chest pain,
who has diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, HIV
(CD4 1100, viral load undetectable), and hepatitis C and was referred for
depression. Psychiatric consultation revealed psychomotor slowing,
confusion, disorientation to time and place, fluctuating levels of con-
sciousness, emotional incontinence, and no evidence of depression.
Diagnosis diagnosed was hypoactive delirium. A comprehensive medical
evaluation, including urine and blood cultures, was recommended and
revealed a urinary tract infection with E. coli sepsis.
Mr D had multimorbid medical illness and was found to have hypoac-
tive delirium due to urosepsis.
viral load (never treated with antiretroviral medications) and has been
depressed and suicidal since his HIV diagnosis. He has multimorbid
medical illnesses as well as a prior history of depression. Mr E is fol-
lowed in an ambulatory AIDS center and has oxygen-dependent chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease with mild cyanosis and severe emphy-
sema, pulmonary hypertension, rheumatic heart disease, untreated hepa-
titis C, Paget’s disease, and benign prostatic hypertrophy. He is addicted
to cigarette-smoking although dependent on oxygen. He has a long-
standing history of major depressive disorder, recurrent, and suicidal
ideation. Mr E’s suicidal thoughts rarely leave him and are related to
HIV stigma.
Mr E was diagnosed with major depressive disorder recurrent, severe,
with chronic suicidal ideation, active nicotine cigarette dependence. He
engaged easily in weekly psychotherapy and agreed to attempt smoking
cessation. He responded well to dynamic psychotherapy, family therapy,
and medication with venlafaxine XR, 150 mg hs and quetiepine, 25 mg at
bedtime for augmentation. Bupropion XL, 150 mg was added for smoking
cessation as well as augmentation. He responded to a recommendation to
use jigsaw puzzles to keep occupied and prevent cigarette cravings but
refused nicotine substitution. After two years of smoking cessation, he
almost acyanotic and has convinced other family members to give up
smoking as well.
Mr E was able, in individual and family therapy, to accept that he was
not a burden to his family but a beloved, productive, valued member, and
a reliable caregiver to his grandchildren. Although he remains intermit-
tently suicidal, he is gradually working on the development of a sense of
meaning and purpose and is less depressed and is adherent to medical and
psychiatric care.
744 M. A. Cohen
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This chapter was adapted in part from the following chapter with permis-
sion of Cambridge University Press: Cohen MA. (2010) Psychiatric
aspects of AIDS. In: JJ Amos and RG Robinson (eds.) Psychosomatic
Medicine: An Introduction to Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, pp. 170–
180, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
REFERENCES
1. Ances BM, Ellis R. (2007) Dementia and neurocognitive disorders due to
HIV-1 infection. Semin Neurol 27: 86–92.
2. APM. (2010) Available at: http://www.apm.org/sigs/oap/. Accessed on 7 July
2010.
3. Blanco C, Weissman MM. (2007) Interpersonal psychotherapy. In: Gabbard
GO, Beck JS, Holmes J (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Psychotherapy, pp. 23–34,
Oxford University Press, NY.
4. CDC. (2009) Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic
infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents. Recommendations from
CDC, the NIH and the HIV medicine association of the infectious diseases
society of America. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58:1–5.
5. Cohen MA. (1989) AIDSism, a new form of discrimination. Am Med News
32: 43.
6. Cohen MA. (2008) History of AIDS psychiatry — A biopsychosocial
approach — Paradigm and paradox. In: Cohen MA, Gorman JM (eds.),
Comprehensive Textbook of AIDS Psychiatry, pp. 3–14, Oxford University
Press, NY.
7. Cohen MA, Alfonso CA. (2004) AIDS psychiatry: Psychiatric and palliative
care, and pain management. In: Wormser GP (ed.), AIDS and Other
Chapter 29
1. INTRODUCTION
Pharmacogenomics is the study of gene variation that predicts medication
response. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics is the application of genetic
testing to provide guidance in selecting and dosing psychotropic
medication.25 While hundreds of associations between gene variations and
medication responses have been reported, this chapter will only review the
most well-known and widely recognized gene variants that are associated
with the responses of antidepressant medications, antipsychotic medica-
tions, and medications used to treat attention deficit hyperactive disorder.
These variants will be identified by their rs number (i.e. reference SNP
number). A list of key variants is listed in Table 1.
At this stage in the evolution of psychiatric pharmacogenomics, the
primary emphasis of clinical testing is primarily to avoid adverse reactions
to psychotropic medications. This has been demonstrated most clearly by
the identification of patients who have impaired metabolic capacity as a
consequence of variations in their drug metabolizing genes that influence
their pharmacokinetic response to specific medications. Increasingly it is
possible to identify genes that influence the pharmacodynamic response
of a patient to specific psychotropic medications. By assessing a panel of
genes that influence medication response, it has become increasingly
746
B1405
antipsychotic medications
rs165599 1338 G/A Predicts response to bupropion
747
1/31/2013 2:42:47 PM
(Continued)
B1405_Ch-29.indd 748
748
Table 1. (Continued)
Gene Nucleotide Nucleotide
Gene name abbreviation rs Number location change Clinical implications
Serotonin 1A HTR1A rs6295 −1019 C/G Predicts response to fluvoxamine,
receptor escitalopram, risperidone, and olanzapine
Serotonin 2A HTR2A rs6311 −1438 G/A Predicts response to antidepressants,
B1405
receptor clozapine, and olanzapine
rs6313 102 T/C Predicts response to clozapine and the
receptor medications
B1405 International Handbook of Psychiatry
possible to select the right drug for the right patient at the right dose.
However, given that many other factors effect medication response
beyond these gene variations, the result of clinical testing will always be
a greater prediction of the probability of an effective response rather than
an absolute certainty that a medication will be effective.
2. ANTIDEPRESSANT MEDICATIONS
Variations in both drug metabolizing enzyme genes and genes that influ-
ence neurotransmission have been associated with antidepressant response.
The most significant and consistent associations will be reviewed.
antidepressants who had one or more copies of the short allele of the indel
promoter polymorphism experienced more side effects than patients who
were homozygous for the long allele. Those patients who were homozygous
for the 10-repeat VNTR in the second intron of SLC6A4 had more side
effects when compared to other VNTR genotypes. In this study, 63% of
patients who were both homozygous for the short indel genotype and
homozygous for the 10-repeat allele of the VNTR variant reported having
side effects. No patients who were both homozygous for the long indel allele
and had one or more copies of the 12-repeat allele experienced side effects.
Depressed geriatric patients who were treated with paroxetine and had
at least one active copy of the active long allele of the indel promoter poly-
morphism were less likely to have side effects than those who were
homozygous for the short allele.27 Specifically, patients who did not have
a copy of the active allele were more likely to discontinue participation in
the study and reported more gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue, agitation,
sweating, and dizziness.
A study of Spanish patients with depression reported they were less
likely to experience antidepressant-induced mania if they had at least one
copy of the long allele of the indel promoter polymorphism. Most of the
patients had been treated with tricyclic antidepressants, although treat-
ment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase
inhibitors, and venlafaxine were also associated with the induction of
manic symptoms.
better than patients who were homozygous for the less active indel pro-
moter short allele of SLC6A4 and who were homozygous for the gua-
nine allele of rs6295.1 Patients who were homozygous for both the short
allele of SLC6A4 and the guanine allele of rs6295 had a remission rate
of only 17%.
3. ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDICATIONS
Four cytochrome P450 drug metabolizing enzyme genes are involved in
the metabolism of antipsychotic medications.
with the guanine allele.37 Patients with a copy of the guanine allele of
rs1801028 (i.e. 932C/G) also have responded more rapidly to risperi-
done when compared to patients who were homozygous for the cyto-
sine allele.19 Furthermore, patients without the cytosine allele of
rs1799732 (i.e. −141 Ins/Del C) have responded to chlorpromazine
more rapidly than did patients who carried an allele with a deleted
cytosine.36
5. CONCLUSION
The field of psychiatric pharmacogenomics is expanding rapidly. While it
is now possible to improve the probability of selecting an effective psy-
chotropic medication for a patient, the accuracy of these predictions will
increase as more genes are identified that affect the individual pharma-
cokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses of each patient.
6. SELF-ASSESSMENT
6.1. A patient is a poor metabolizer of CYP2D6 and CYP2C9,
but has normal metabolic capacity for CYP2C19 and
CYP1A2. Which antidepressant would be the best choice
as an initial medication to treat a major depression?
(A) Fluoxetine.
(B) Venlafaxine.
(C) Desipramine.
(D) Paroxetine.
(E) Escitalopram.
Answer: E
REFERENCES
1. Arias B, Catalan R, Gasto C, Gutierrez B, Fananas L. (2005) Evidence for a
combined genetic effect of the 5-HT1A receptor and serotonin transporter
genes in the clinical outcome of major depressive patients treated with cita-
lopram. J Psychopharmacol 19: 166–172.
2. Arranz MJ, Collier DA, Munro J, Sham P, Kirov G, Sodhi M, Roberts G, Price
J, Kerwin RW. (1996) Analysis of a structural polymorphism in the 5-HT2A
receptor and clinical response to clozapine. Neurosci Lett 217: 177–178.
3. Arranz MJ, Munro J, Birkett J, Bolonna A, Mancama DT, Sodhi M, Lesch
KP, Meyer JFW, Sham P, Collier DA, Murray RM, Kerwin RW. (2000)
Pharmacogenetic prediction of clozapine response. Lancet 355:
1615–1616.
4. Berrettini WH, Wileyto EP, Epstein L, Restine S, Hawk L, Shields P, Niaura
R, Lerman C. (2007) Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene variants
predict response to bupropion therapy for tobacco dependence. Biol
Psychiatry 61: 111–118.
5. Bertolino A, Caforio G, Blasi G, De Candia M, Latorre V, Petruzzella V,
Altamura M, Nappi G, Papa S, Callicott JH, Mattay VS, Bellomo A,
Scarabino T, Weinberger DR, Nardini M. (2004) Interaction of COMT
Val108/158 Met genotype and olanzapine treatment on prefrontal cortical
function in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 161: 1798–1805.
6. Choi MJ, Kang RH, Ham BJ, Jeong HY, Lee MS. (2005) Serotonin receptor
2A gene polymorphism (–1438A/G) and short-term treatment response to
citalopram. Neuropsychobiology 52: 155–162.
26. Mrazek DA, Rush AJ, Biernacka JM, O’Kane DJ, Cunningham JM, Wieben
ED, Schaid DJ, Drews MS, Courson VL, Snyder KA, Black JL, Weinshilboum
RM. (2009) SLC6A4 variation and citalopram response. Am J Med Genet B
Neuropsychiatr Genet, 150B: 341–351.
27. Murphy GM, Hollander SB, Rodrigues HE, Kremer C, Schatzberg AF.
(2004) Effects of the serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism on
mirtazapine and paroxetine efficacy and adverse events in geriatric major
depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61: 1163–1169.
28. Popp J, Leucht S, Heres S, Steimer W. (2006) Serotonin transporter polymor-
phisms and side effects in antidepressant therapy — a pilot study.
Pharmacogenomics 7: 159–166.
29. Reynolds GP, Arranz B, Templeman LA, Fertuzinhos S, San L. (2006) Effect
of 5-HT1A receptor gene polymorphism on negative and depressive symp-
tom response to antipsychotic treatment of drug-naive psychotic patients. Am
J Psychiatry 163: 1826–1829.
30. Scharfetter J. (2004) Pharmacogenetics of dopamine receptors and response
to antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia — an update. Pharmacogenomics 5:
691–698.
31. Serretti A, Artioli P, Lorenzi C, Pirovano A, Tubazio V, Zanardi R. (2004) The
C (-1019) G polymorphism of the 5-HT1A gene promoter and antidepressant
response in mood disorders: Preliminary findings. Int J Neuropsychophogy
7: 453–460.
32. Serretti A, Kato M, De Ronchi D, Kinoshita T. (2007) Meta-analysis of sero-
tonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) association
with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor efficacy in depressed patients.
Mol Psychiatry 12: 247–257.
33. Staddon S, Arranz MJ, Mancama D, Mata I, Kerwin RW. (2002) Clinical
applications of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry. Psychopharmacology 162:
18–23.
34. Stein MA, Waldman ID, Sarampote CS, Seymour KE, Robb AS, Conlon C,
Kim SJ, Cook EH. (2005) Dopamine transporter genotype and methylpheni-
date dose response in children with ADHD. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:
1374–1382.
35. Szekeres G, Keri S, Juhasz A, Rimanoczy A, Szendi I, Czimmer C, Janka, Z.
(2004). Role of dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) and dopamine transporter
(DAT) polymorphism in cognitive dysfunctions and therapeutic response to
Chapter 30
Ethics in Psychiatry
Kristi Estabrook
1. INTRODUCTION
A medical student refers to himself as “doctor” when he calls a family
member of a patient because he feels it is too complicated to explain his
role in the patient’s care and wants to ensure he is taken seriously.
A chronically mentally ill woman with schizophrenia gives a hand-knit
scarf as a thank-you gift to a graduating psychiatry resident who has man-
aged her medications for a number of years.
A forensic psychiatrist is asked to perform a competency evaluation for
a prisoner sentenced to the death penalty. The prisoner will only be
executed if he is found to be competent on evaluation.
Ethical situations occur at all levels of experience and training, but the
field of ethics can at times feel far removed from the pressures of clinical
patient work. It may seem, to the busy medical student or clinical psychia-
trist, to be better left to the academician. Yet, in all fields in medicine,
particularly psychiatry, ethical dilemmas are a near-daily part of the grind
and grit of clinical work. How, then, can a topic that flavors daily clinical
work feel so distant? It is because ethics is subtle. It is nuanced in a way
that one may not see the ethical dilemmas unless a foundation of ethical
knowledge has been set. Thus, it is unlike many other medical practices
where a “you will know it when you see it” mentality can often be applied
(think first encounter with a manic patient). Rather, ethics is more “you
768
will see it when you know it.” That is what makes studying and learning
the core principles of ethics so important, because trying to be an ethical
physician is of no use if one is unable to spot an ethical dilemma when it
occurs. This chapter will give a foundation of basic ethical principles and
review the most salient ethical topics in psychiatry in a practical and
internationally focused manner. The goal is to provide a beginning foun-
dation of psychiatric ethical knowledge so that ethics can be more readily
seen in, and thus more easily applied to, everyday practice.
2. HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL
PSYCHIATRIC ETHICS
Ethics has been an international focus in psychiatry in part due to past
atrocities that have been uncovered in which psychiatrists played a cen-
tral role. In Nazi Germany psychiatrists were involved in passing laws
allowing the forced sterilization of people with “defective genes,”
including mentally ill patients, in the name of “racial hygiene.” A few
years later, psychiatrists were involved in carrying out the “Euthanasia
Programme” in Germany in which thousands of mentally ill people were
killed in psychiatric hospitalizations just before the Holocaust. In the
Soviet Union from the 1960s to 1980s, psychiatrists were involved in
labeling political dissenters with psychiatric illnesses to justify impris-
oning them against their will, at times for many years.11 Although this
may seem like a problem of the distant past, psychiatrists in the last
several years have been involved in religious repression in China and
in aiding and participating in interrogations in military prisons in the
United States.11
Ethics in psychiatry is imperative not just because of past atrocities on
the part of psychiatrists but also because of the susceptibility of the psy-
chiatric patient to be treated unethically. Mentally ill persons are inher-
ently vulnerable because of the nature of their illness. Throughout history
they have been a victimized population. The mentally ill have been tar-
geted as witches, burned at the stake, and killed in the name of ethnic
cleansing.11 Even what was offered as treatment for mental illness was
often painful and baseless in science. Previous “treatments” of the men-
tally ill include bleeding, beating, isolation, and lobotomies.14 Because the
770 K. Estabrook
mentally ill do have special vulnerability from the very nature of their
illness, which can impair judgment and reason, extra precautions must be
taken to protect them.
In an attempt to protect patients and to construct an international stand-
ard for ethics in psychiatry, the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) met
in 1977 and passed the Hawaii Declaration.16 The Hawaii Declaration was
the first formal international code of ethics for psychiatry and focused on
acting in the patient’s best interest and respecting patient autonomy.14,16 A
major revision, the Declaration of Madrid, now serves as the overriding
international standard for psychiatric ethics. The Declaration of Madrid
gives general guidelines for basic ethical concepts but also takes specific
stances on certain issues such as euthanasia, torture, the death penalty,
selection of sex, and organ transplantation, among others.16,25
3.1. Autonomy
Autonomy in the field of medical ethics refers to the concept of self-
determination and self-rule. It is the right on the patient’s part to choose.
3.2. Non-maleficence
Non-maleficence is a single word to encompass the Hippocratic oath’s
mantra “first, do no harm.” It is an ethical ideal that is central to all physi-
cian–patient interactions. It is the principle used when weighing the risk
and benefits of a medication or potential procedure. It is also the main
ethical consideration concerning the participant in medical research.
Because research is meant for advancing the greater good, and generally
not for the benefit of an individual participant, the lack of any harm to
participants is the most important value of ethical medical research.23
3.3. Beneficence
Beneficence refers to doing good for the patient. Like the root of the word
implies, it is the ethical principle of benefiting others. However, unlike
non-maleficence, which is a hard-and-fast principle with potential legal
consequences in cases of patient harm, beneficence can be thought of as a
772 K. Estabrook
3.4. Justice
Justice in biomedical ethics deals with fair and equitable, but not neces-
sarily equal, distribution of resources and access to care. Whether this
includes equal access to care and globalization of finite health care
resources (such as organs for organ transplant) is hotly debated. The con-
cept of justice is also interpreted and implemented differently throughout
the globe, with some nations having universal access to health care and
others with a fee-for-service model or third-party-payer system that does
not ensure equal levels of care. Regardless, the ethical principle of justice
works to bring in a larger societal perspective into what is otherwise an
ethical discussion about individuals, specifically patients and providers.
The concept of justice, then, serves as a balance between individual
autonomy and beneficence, the interests of all of society, and the good of
other individuals.
It is important to note that none of these basic ethical principles trumps
another principle. Although some cultures may place heavier value on
certain principles than others, in general each principle should be initially
given equal weight. Thus, the core ethical principles must be applied to an
individual circumstance and then priority given to certain principles,
depending on the context and issues at hand.3
3.5. Professionalism
The concept of professionalism adds two additional ethical values that
must be considered: veracity and fidelity. However, to understand how
these values play into the ethical framework for medical ethics, the idea
774 K. Estabrook
776 K. Estabrook
of that ethnic group and can in fact turn into another form of modern-day
paternalism.17 A different way to view autonomy in a family-centered
culture would be to see the patient’s choice to allow family to be the pri-
mary communicators and decision makers as a form of autonomy in and
of itself, permitting it is actually the choice of the patient.3
778 K. Estabrook
6. ETHICS IN PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatry as a specialty deals with people’s most personal emotions,
thoughts, and past experiences. Psychiatry is also a field around which
there continues to be much stigma, particularly in some areas of the world.
The intensely private nature of the work makes ethics and maintaining
professionalism in psychiatry of utmost importance. It also brings unique
ethical situations and challenges to the table. To be able to practically
apply ethical principles and acquired ethical skills, background knowl-
edge in some of the most salient of these unique issues in psychiatric
ethics is required.
6.1. Boundaries
The concept of boundaries is of particular importance in psychiatry
because of the close relationship and intimate details that the patient
shares. Also, the healing in psychiatry, particularly psychotherapy, is often
a result of a positive therapeutic relationship itself rather than a procedure
or prescription.19 It is because of the more intense nature of the relation-
ship that psychiatrists have to pay even more careful attention to bounda-
ries between themselves and patients than other areas of medicine.
Boundaries can be thought of as a frame around the therapeutic rela-
tionship that serves as the limit of appropriate behavior in a clinical set-
ting.7,9 Ideally, appropriate boundaries create a safe and predictable
therapeutic relationship in which the patient can explore their issues with-
out concern of being taken advantage of or exploited. The Madrid
Declaration by the WPA emphasizes that psychiatrists should not use the
psychiatrist–patient relationship to benefit themselves in any way or vio-
late the boundaries of the professional relationship.25 However, this ethical
780 K. Estabrook
782 K. Estabrook
784 K. Estabrook
786 K. Estabrook
6.6. Research
Research in psychiatry using human subjects is a necessary part of the
advancement of treatment for the mentally ill to relieve suffering.
However, the psychiatric population has special risks and considerations
involving research due to the fact that the nature of their illness can impact
cognitive processes and thus can affect the ability to receive truly informed
consent.21 For example, can a man with schizophrenia who believes that
joining a research study will guarantee him safety from the military
police, who he thinks are out to get him, be admitted to a research study
for antipsychotic medication? This illustrates how impaired thinking can
be both the issue that possibly limits ability to true informed consent (in
this case psychosis) but also can be the very illness that the researching
team is attempting to study. This can make research in psychiatry a
complicated undertaking.
The overarching ethical framework for psychiatric research involves
the principles of beneficence, justice, and non-maleficence. The concept
of beneficence in research concerns the broader sense of providing benefit
to society and decreased suffering through advances in treatment and
diagnosis of disease. Thus, the concept of beneficence does not always, in
the area of research, mean direct benefit for the subject enrolled in the
study. At times, research subjects can get direct clinical benefit, such as
when they are enrolled in drug trials in the treatment arm, but at other
times a subject is placed in the placebo arm of a study, and thus does not
garner any direct benefit from the trial. In this case, then, the ethical prin-
ciple of beneficence in research is broadened to include the general public
and those individuals who suffer from the illness that is being researched.
Thus non-maleficence is the balancing and protective ethical principle for
the individual subjects enrolled in research studies. Non-maleficence to
the clinical subjects enrolled in research is the most important overriding
ethical principle, and must be carefully built into each research study and
continually monitored throughout the clinical investigation. The principle
of justice in research guides recruitment of subjects and works to ensure
equal opportunity and access to research. Justice also ensures that no
population, specifically vulnerable populations, carries an overwhelming
burden of involvement in research.
Specific worldwide ethical guidelines are also in place to protect
patients and guide researchers on the ethical use of human subjects in
medical research. The World Medical Association’s Declaration of
Helsinki is the worldwide standard for medical research ethics and serves
as an international guide on how to conduct ethical medical research with
human subjects.24 Some of the basic principles of the Declaration of
Helsinki state that it is the physician’s duty to protect the dignity, health,
and privacy of human subjects, that human subject welfare in research
should be placed at all times above advancement of knowledge and inter-
ests of society, and that research protocols should be carefully considered
and submitted to review boards for approval to minimize potential harm.24
788 K. Estabrook
The Declaration also discusses the idea of risk versus benefit, which has
now been widely accepted as a basic standard in human research, which
is guided by the moral principles of societal beneficence and individual
non-maleficence as described earlier.23
Informed consent is a basic premise of human research as well and
has been an area of contention in psychiatric research due to the inherent
vulnerability of the mentally ill and the concern that informed consent is
more difficult to obtain in the setting of serious mental illness.2 However,
it is also ethically concerning to make general policies or special
requirements that restrict the mentally ill from being involved in
research. Studies in this area suggest that subjects with serious psychi-
atric illness are generally able to give informed consent for research and
that their motivations for enrolling in psychiatric research are generally
similar to those of people enrolling in other medical research.5 Those
who do have difficulty with informed consent often can have improved
understanding of the research process with educational interventions.21
Thus, serious mental illness alone does not ethically exclude individuals
from participating in research. Overall, it is important that individuals
with mental illness neither carry the burden of research nor be limited by
blanket policy from participating in research because of their mental
illness.
7. CONCLUSION
Ethics is an important endeavor in all fields of medicine, but because of
the increased vulnerability of the mentally ill, it is an essential part of the
field of psychiatry. This chapter served as a brief overview of basic ethical
principles, the history of international psychiatric ethics, and special top-
ics in psychiatric ethics with an international perspective. Laws and cus-
toms in individual countries and regions should be reviewed, particularly
in regard to confidentiality, informed consent, and involuntary treatment,
to gain a more complete understanding of local rules and regulations.
Ethics in psychiatry has evolved over the last century from a minor con-
sideration to a key component of competency. The future of ethics in
psychiatry will need to adapt to new issues and the challenges of advanc-
ing technology. Although the details of ethical discussions may evolve and
8. KEY POINTS
• Be cognizant of potential ethical dilemmas in order to spot them when
they arise.
• Use basic ethical principles as a guide to solving ethical dilemmas.
• Consider an ethics consult for particularly difficult cases.
• Keep cultural norms in mind but evaluate each individual’s personal
beliefs and values.
• Discuss with a supervisor all ethical cases with which you feel uneasy.
• Decisional capacity is fluid in nature and distinct from competence,
which is court determined.
• Be honest with patients about your level of training and experience.
• Be familiar with local laws surrounding confidentiality and its
exceptions.
• Do not engage in sexual relationships with any current or former
patient.
9. SELF-ASSESSMENT
9.1. A 35-year-old woman dies from an intentional overdose.
Her husband approaches her psychiatrist of the last
10 years, devastated about her death and looking for
answers as to why she might have killed herself. The
patient did not sign a release of information before her
death. What should the psychiatrist say to the husband?
(A) The psychiatrist should tell the husband everything that is known
about the patient, because now that the patient is dead, confidentiality
is no longer needed.
(B) The psychiatrist should not tell the husband anything because of
possible legal action against the psychiatrist for the patient’s death.
790 K. Estabrook
(C) The psychiatrist should explain that he or she is not able to reveal any
information about the patient because of confidentiality
requirements.
(D) The psychiatrist should tell the husband only the minimal amount of
information needed to answer his questions, if the psychiatrist thinks
that the patient would have been okay with that.
Confidentiality rules apply even after a patient’s death. In this case, the
patient did not sign a release of information form, and thus the psychiatrist
is ethically, and in many countries legally, bound to continue to uphold
standards of confidentiality. In some countries verbal consent before death
on the part of the patient may suffice; however, many require a written
consent to release medical information, even to families. This is based on
the ethical principle of autonomy and fidelity.
Answer: C
Although the patient is not suicidal or homicidal, his mental illness still
caused him to take actions that placed him in danger of bodily harm. This
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2009) The Principles of Medical Ethics
with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry, American Psychiatric
Association, Arlington, VA.
2. Appelbaum P, Grisso T. (1995) The MacArthur competence study I, II, III.
Law and Hum. Behav 19: 105–174.
3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. (2009) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed.
Oxford University Press, NY.
4. Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S. (1995) Ethnicity and
attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA 274: 820–825.
5. Dunn LB, Candilis PJ, Roberts LW. (2006) Emerging empirical evidence on
the ethics of schizophrenia research. Schizophr Bull 32: 111–119.
6. Hoop JG. (2004) Hidden ethical dilemmas in psychiatric residency training:
The psychiatry resident as dual agent. Acad Psychiatry 28: 183–189.
7. Gabbard GO. (1999) Boundary violations. In: Bloch S, Chodoff P, Green SA
(eds.), Psychiatric Ethics, 3rd ed. Chapter 8, pp. 141–160, Oxford University
Press, NY.
8. Gutheil, T.H. (1999) Ethics and forensic psychiatry. In: Bloch S, Chodoff P,
Green SA (eds.), Psychiatric Ethics, 3rd ed. Chapter 16, pp. 345−362,
Oxford University Press, NY.
9. Gutheil TH, Gabbard GO. (1993) The concept of boundaries in clinical prac-
tice: Theoretical and risk-management dimensions. Am J Psychiatry 150:
188–196.
10. Kastrup M. (2000) Scandinavian approaches. In: Okash A, Arboleda-Florez J,
Sartorius N (eds.), Ethics Culture and Psychiatry, pp. 65−82, American
Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.
792 K. Estabrook
23. Wing J. (1999) Ethics and psychiatric research. In: Bloch S, Chodoff P,
Green SA (eds.), Psychiatric Ethics, 3rd ed. Chapter 1, pp. 461–478, Oxford
University Press, NY.
24. World Medical Association. (2004) Declaration of Helsinki. Available at:
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/helsinki.html. Accessed 22 June 2010.
25. World Psychiatric Association. (2005) Declaration of Madrid. Available at:
http://www.wpanet.org/detail.php?section_id=5&category_id=9&content_
id=48. Accessed 16 June 2010.
Chapter 31
1. INTRODUCTION
Contemporary psychiatry is practised in a globalizing, multicultural
environment. Clinicians increasingly assess and manage patients with
cultural backgrounds different from their own.3 In this environment, a key
task is to assess the patient and formulate their problems in the context of
their culture. Patients may not present with classic ICD or DSM symp-
toms. Presenting symptoms are influenced by cultural conceptions of
illness and the way cultures allow idioms of distress to be expressed.
They are modified by the way in which idioms are presented. Patients
may use culturally familiar metaphors to express their distress.15 The
clinical interaction itself is influenced by the personal history, training,
socioeconomic status and culture of the clinician, and the personal his-
tory, education, socioeconomic status, and culture of the patient. Their
beliefs and values may differ.15 Cultural differences can lead to misinter-
pretation triggered by linguistic difficulties, and differing styles of non-
verbal communication and codes of etiquette. Members of non-western
ethnic groups often view mental health services with mistrust because
they may be seen to represent dominant Western cultural values and
implicit racism, and rely on formulations that ignore non-Western cul-
tural values.9 However, blanket cultural assumptions about the ‘other’
794
2. CULTURAL PSYCHIATRY
Cultural psychiatry deals with the impact of social and cultural differences
on mental illness: its occurrence, manifestations, management, and out-
comes. From the perspective of cultural psychiatry, culture influences the
sources, the symptoms, and idioms of distress, the individuals’ explana-
tory models, their coping mechanisms, and help-seeking behavior as well
as the social response to distress and disability.14 Thus, cultural differences
can translate into distinct manifestations and treatment expectations of
illness.
In order to provide care that is appropriate and acceptable to people
from different cultural backgrounds, clinicians need to take these factors
into account. This chapter aims to introduce a culturally sensitive frame-
work for the clinical assessment of psychiatric disorders. The sequential
aspects of this framework are sensitivity, awareness, knowledge, and
competence.9 It can be adapted to individual patients’ social and cultural
contexts.
Culture: Culture is the learned, shared beliefs, values, attitudes, and behaviors characteristic
of a society or population that guides its thinking, decisions, and actions.17 It refers to
patterns of perceiving and adapting to the world. From a psychiatric perspective, culture
influences the causes, symptoms, and idioms of distress, the patient’s explanatory models,
coping mechanisms, and help-seeking behavior, and the social response to illness.
Ethnicity: A subjective or social description of belonging to a group whose common
heritage distinguishes its members from other groups. This can be based on subjective
identification, a shared culture, common geographic origins, race, religion, or an appraisal
of physical appearance.
Race: An inconsistently defined term that has varied by culture and over time. In
anthropology, it refers to a social construct independent of biological or genetic variation.
In legal usage, it refers to a group of people defined by their skin color, nationality
(including citizenship), or ethnic or national origins.
Identity: A person’s internal self-concept and external expression of his/her individuality
or sense of group affiliation. This can be based on social, cultural, ethnic, economic,
religious, and personal factors.
Acculturation: The process of adapting to another culture while attempting to retain
aspects of ones’ original culture. This may involve physical, psychological, social, cultural,
and biological changes that occur in response to pressure to conform to and accommodate
the dominant cultural lifestyle. Berry2 defines four states of acculturation: integration (both
the individual’s original culture and the dominant culture are valued); separation (the
individual’s culture is valued and the dominant culture is devalued); assimilation (the
dominant culture is valued but the individual’s culture is devalued; and marginalization
(both the individual’s culture and the dominant culture are devalued). Awareness of one’s
cultural history and being bicultural (social competence in host culture without losing the
same competence in the culture of origin) is associated with increased resilience and better
mental health.
Emic and etic: The emic perspective refers to a description of a belief or behavior by a
person within the culture. This insider’s perspective provides a culturally contextualized
interpretation that is culturally specific. The etic perspective refers to a description of a
belief or behavior by an external observer. This outsider’s perspective provides a culturally
neutral interpretation that than can be universally applied to other cultures.
The terms are derived from cultural anthropology.
Cultural competence: The set of congruent attitudes, behaviors, skills, and procedures that
enable the clinician to work effectively and efficiently in cross-cultural situations.
Its key domains are empathy, cultural sensitivity, cultural knowledge, and cultural skills.
Its approach is pragmatic, context driven, and result-oriented.
reported by the first study on autism in Africa and the rates were even
lower in African children of African parents who had not left Africa.19 No
increased risk has been found for other mental disorders. Differences in
the prevalence of anxiety and depression between migrant and native-born
communities are inconsistent internationally. International studies of
depression have found more comorbid personality disorders in Western
centers.
The observed epidemiological differences may be true or influenced by
methodological problems related to insufficient cross-cultural validation
of instruments and methods. Such problems can artificially exaggerate or
reduce rates. Ideally, data should be collected using research questions
and instruments that have been validated both qualitatively and quantita-
tively, using a mixture of emic and etic approaches. It should then be
interpreted within the cultural i.e. emic context of symptoms, illness
experience, and disease.6
individual’s distress and that of every disorder, rather than being con-
cerned with finding room for specific syndromes in current classification
systems.23
1. How long ago did the patient migrate? How old were they at the time?
2. Was the migration internal or international?
3. Reasons for migration (e.g. occupational, educational, economic,
political)?
4. Was migration forced or voluntary? Have they experienced violence
or natural disasters?
5. Were they prepared for migration?
6. Did the patient migrate alone or with family? Who was left behind
and how does the patient feel about this?
7. Difficulties in migration?
8. Differences between expectations and outcomes of migration?
9. Perceptions of the new region/country and culture?
10. Social supports? Contact with family and people with common
migratory experiences and a shared heritage?
11. Is this migration temporary or permanent? Previous experiences
of migration and outcomes?
Language
First language? Others?
With what degree of fluency?
Spoken in what contexts?
Social interaction
Socialize with other ethnocultural groups?
Supports from members of other ethnocultural groups?
Religion
Do they consider themselves religious?
With what belief and frequency? Taboos and rituals?
Where do they practice and with whom?
8.3. Mood
People use adjectives like depressed, sad, fed up, empty, fine, happy, and
scared, among others, to describe their mood. However, in everyday life,
especially in Western societies, the expression “I feel depressed” can
mean something figurative, rather than literal. Additionally, it can denote
a normal or abnormal state, and if abnormal either an individual symp-
tom or a full-blown disorder. Clarifications, if sought, can range from
“I feel a bit depressed,” through “I sometimes feel depressed,” to “I have
always felt depressed.” These clarifications, and the impact of the
reported “depressed” mood on functioning, are crucial in the assessment
of mood in the cross-cultural encounter, particularly between the non-
Western clinician and the Western patient. Affect is the external expres-
sion of mood. In many cultures e.g. British culture, it can be colored by
cultural conditioning towards a less expressive, stoic “need to put up a
brave face” in adversity. “Flat affect” has been observed to be a norma-
tive component of mourning in some Native American cultures.15 Again,
investigation is the key to accurate assessment. People in certain cultures
may perceive the impact of stressful circumstances in situational, collec-
tive, moral, or physical/somatic terms. In such circumstances, the level of
impairment is a better measure of the degree of distress than either mood
or affect.
8.5. Delusions
Delusions, by definition, need to be established as inappropriate to the
persons’ cultural context. A clinician unfamiliar with a patient’s culture
may misattribute such beliefs, either as pathological or normative.
Religious ideas, and cosmic, spiritual and culturally unfamiliar explana-
tions, should be recorded verbatim. Clarify the patient’s explanation for it,
and seek the response of the family and cultural community to the expla-
nation. Record this clearly. Life events with discriminatory or persecutory
elements are a part of everyday reality for some people e.g. ethnic minori-
ties and refugees. These can become internal representations that can
emerge in their mental life, fantasy, and beliefs. However, if a culturally
unfamiliar belief is accompanied by functional impairment and behavior
inappropriate to the culture of origin, it is likely to be pathological.
8.6. Perception
Perceptual disturbances such as illusions, hallucinations, depersonaliza-
tion and derealization are experienced in reference to the self and the
environment. The circumstances of occurrence of an unusual perceptual
experience are important. For instance, auditory experiences of the voice
of a dead relative calling the living to join them in the afterworld are part
of normal bereavement in many Native American cultures.15 Normative
(and often therapeutic) trance and possession states in many cultures can
include hearing and seeing spiritual beings. Dissociative experiences can
also cause perceptual abnormalities. Such experiences do not indicate
complicated grief reactions or psychoses. Document exact experiences,
consistency and clarify differences between illusions, hallucinations and
suggestibility states. Visual phenomena can be particularly difficult to
place within the mental state examination. Investigate and discuss with
informants to avoid erroneous labeling.
(1) Pathogenic effect (where cultural ideas and beliefs generate particular
types of stress and lead to a disorder e.g. Type A behavior).
(2) Pathoselective effect (where culturally selected reaction and coping
patterns are deployed when faced with stress e.g. amok attacks).
(3) Pathoplastic effect (where culture shapes the content of psychopathol-
ogy e.g. delusions).
(4) Pathoelaborating effect (where culture supports the exaggeration of
stress reactions into unique patterns e.g. ritual suicide in Japan).
(5) Pathofacilitating effect (where cultural attitudes promote the fre-
quency of occurrence of particular disorders e.g. eating disorders).
(6) Pathoreactive effect (where culture influences communal responses to
distress, disorder, and disability e.g. interpreting and labeling distress,
consulting a traditional healer etc.).
and the Latin American Guide for Psychiatric Diagnosis represent cultur-
ally competent diagnostic systems developed to address specific local
requirements.
10. MANAGEMENT
The formulation of a culturally competent management plan needs to take
the patient’s wishes and explanatory model of illness into account.
However, this needs to be balanced with the risk assessment. This is par-
ticularly relevant if the clinical decision is based on inadequate informa-
tion. Arrange for a further assessment if the problem is not urgent. This
will allow you time to think about the presentation, consult senior col-
leagues, obtain information from past records, other professionals, family
members and relevant members of the community, and gather more infor-
mation about the patient’s problem within its cultural context. Let the
patient and family know that you will be doing this. This is important
since your formulation needs to agree as much as possible with their
explanatory models of illness and perceptions of acceptable management.
In case of disagreement, arrange to meet them to discuss the risk assess-
ment. Treatment adherence is especially low in cross-cultural settings.
Family and community support is crucial to adherence and overall out-
come, so do not alienate them.
There are ethnic variations in response to psychotropic medication as a
result of both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences.
Interactions resulting from the concomitant use of traditional medicines,
differing levels of stress and other environmental and social factors may
affect the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of psychotropic
medications.4 For instance, African Americans may respond faster and
more favorably to tricyclic antidepressants, but are also more sensitive to
their side effects.5 Such factors need to be taken into consideration while
prescribing. Do not prescribe symptomatically if the diagnosis remains
unclear. This may expose the patient to needless adverse effects and make
them less likely to adhere to treatment and attend follow-up. Evidence
based psychotherapies can be adapted to be appropriate for people from
different backgrounds. In addition to being open to individual flexibility
within a framework of fidelity, practitioners have proposed systematic
11. CONCLUSION
Human beings are guided by their values. Their thinking and behavior are
powerfully influenced by attitudes, norms, peer values, and upbringing
derived from the culture of which they are a part. These values affect the
way they seek help, and where they seek help. It also affects the way
health services are delivered. Help-seeking is also influenced by educa-
tion, socioeconomic status, previous experiences of help seeking, and
explanatory models of illness. Explanatory models of illness, in turn, are
influenced by familial, social, religious, and folk constructs. Clinicians
bring into the clinical encounter their own values, training, experience,
and cultural and other prejudices which may or may not promote the
therapeutic alliance. Thus, it is of paramount importance that clinicians
are aware of the personal cultural perspectives, strengths, and weaknesses
they bring into the clinical encounter. Equally, they should try and learn
as much as they can about the patient’s cultural perspectives, strengths,
and weaknesses. A therapeutic alliance that results from a mutually cultur-
ally sensitive and respectful clinical encounter is very likely to be a good
one. A good therapeutic alliance is crucial to effective diagnosis and
good clinical outcomes. In a globalizing world, cultural psychiatry is good
clinical psychiatry.
The structure and content of current international diagnostic and clas-
sificatory systems are marked by an uneven and inadequate recognition of
culture. In a changing, multicultural clinical milieu, this jeopardizes
accurate diagnosis, the central step in the clinical encounter.
13. SELF-ASSESSMENT
13.1. The WHO conducted two international studies,
the IPSS and the DOSMeD. These studies
(A) Compared the incidence of schizophrenia across countries.
(B) Demonstrated that the overall course and outcome of schizophrenia
was uniformly better in developing countries.
(C) Showed a better overall outcome for schizophrenia in India and
Nigeria in the IPSS, and significantly higher rates of complete remis-
sion but similar rates of continuous illness in developing countries
compared to developed, in DOSMeD.
(D) Showed that Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR) for schizophrenia
cohorts were significantly higher in developing countries.
(E) Compared the diagnosis of schizophrenia across countries.
Answer: E. All the above are culturally sanctioned metaphors from the
respective cultures. Other somatic metaphors include: “Blood jumps from
the veins of the heart to my head, my feet, and hands” in Ecuador, “My body
is broken” and “My body is aching, fatigued” in Dubai, “I feel as if there is
hot water on my back” in the UAE, “Feeling hot” in India, and “Heat in the
head” in Nigeria. For an overview, read Bhugra and Mastrogianni.3
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual,
4th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
2. Berry JW. (2004) Psychology of group relations: Cultural and social
dimensions. Aviat Space Environ Med 75(Suppl 1): C52–C57.
3. Bhugra D, Mastrogianni A. (2004) Globalisation and mental disorders:
Overview with relation to depression. Br J Psychiatry 184(1): 10–20.
4. Bhugra D, Bhui K. (1999) Ethnic and cultural factors in psychopharmacol-
ogy. Adv Psychiatr Treatment 5: 89–95.
5. Brown C, Schulberg HC, Sacco D, Perel JM, Houck PR. (1999) Effectiveness
of treatments for major depression in primary medical care practice: A
post hoc analysis of outcomes for African American and white patients.
J Affect Disord 53: 185–192.
6. De Jong JTVM, Van Ommeren M. (2002) Toward a culture-informed epide-
miology: Combining qualitative and quantitative research in transcultural
contexts. Transcult Psychiatry 39: 422–433.
7. Dealberto M-J. (2010) Ethnic origin and increased risk for schizophrenia in
immigrants to countries of recent and longstanding immigration. Acta
Psychiatr Scand 1–15.
8. Ellis WG. (1897) Latah: A mental malady of the Malays. J Men Sci. 43:
33–40.
9. Goldberg D, Murray R (eds.) (2002) Special assessments with adults. In: The
Maudsley Handbook of Practical Psychiatry, 4th ed. Oxford University
Press, Oxford.
10. Hall, GCN. (2001) Psychotherapy research with ethnic minorities: Empirical,
ethical, and conceptual issues. J Consult Clin Psychol 69(3): 502–510.
11. Helman GG. (1987) Heart disease and the cultural construction of time: The
type A behaviour pattern as a western culture-bound syndrome. Soc Sci Med
25(9): 969–979.
12. Hogg M, Abrams D. (1988) Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of
Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. Routledge, London.
13. Jablensky A, Sartorius N, Ernberg G, et al. (1992) Schizophrenia:
Manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health
Organization ten-country study. Psychol Med Monogr. 20(Suppl): 1–97.
14. Kirmayer LJ. (2001) Cultural variations in the clinical presentation of
depression and anxiety: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Clin
Psychiatry 62(Suppl 13): 22–28.
15. Kleinman A. (1988) Rethinking Psychiatry: From Cultural Category to
Personal Experience, Macmillan/Free Press, NY.
16. Leff J, Warner R. (2006) Social Inclusion of People with Mental Illness,
pp. 12–13, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Leininger M. (1991) Culture Care Diversity and Universality: A Theory of
Nursing, National League for Nursing Press, NY.
18. Littlewood R. (1995) Psychopathology and personal agency: Modernity,
culture change and eating disorders in South Asian Societies. Br J Med
Psychol 68(1): 45–63.
19. Lotter V. (1978) Childhood autism in Africa. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
19(3): 231–244.
20. McGrath J, Saha S, Welham J, El Saadi O, McCauley C, Chant D. (2004)
A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: The distribution of
rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology.
BMC Med 2: 13.
21. Paniagua FA. (2000) Culture-bound syndromes, culture variations, and psy-
chopathology. In: Cuéllar I, Paniagua FA (eds.), Handbook of Multicultural
Mental Health: Assessment and Treatment of Diverse Populations,
pp. 140–141, Academic Press, NY.
22. Saha S, Chant D, Welham J, McGrath J. (2005) A systematic review of the
prevalence of schizophrenia. PLoS Medicine 2(5): e141.
23. Tseng WS. (2006) From peculiar psychiatric disorders through culture bound
syndromes to culture related specific syndromes. Transcult Psychiatry 43:
554–576.
24. Tseng WS. (2001) Handbook of Cultural Psychiatry, Academic Press, San
Diego, CA.
25. Uchimura VY, Akimoto, Ishibash. (1938) The syndrome of imu in the Ainu
race (Comment). Am J Psychiatry 94: 1467–1469.
26. Üstün TB, Sartorius N (eds.) (1995) Mental Illness in General Health Care.
An International Study, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
27. World Health Organization. (1979) Schizophrenia: An International
Follow-up Study, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
28. World Health Organization. (1992) International Classification of Diseases,
10th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Chapter 32
823
of another person (the evil eye or nazar). Mullah will be referred if the
patient is suspected of suffering from a supernatural illness such as a dis-
sociative state. Healy and Aslam10 suggested that hakims are preferred to
Western medical practitioners for their holistic view of illness and family
orientations in assessment and treatment, as well as their ample time
dedicated for consultation. Later studies also confirmed that many
South Asian immigrants in the United Kingdom consulted hakims for
their ailments.
of the Yellow Emperor, was written over 2,000 years ago. The founding
principle of TCM rests on the assumption that there exists a balance
between a variety of opposing hypothetical constructs, the most promi-
nent of which is the yin and the yang. Maintaining a balance (or har-
mony) between such opposing forces has far-reaching implications on
the wellness of the bodily system, which is conceptually divided into
the five organs: the heart, the liver, the spleen, the lungs, and the kid-
neys. Interestingly these organs do not correspond to the current ana-
tomical definition of corresponding organs as defined by Western
anatomy. By direct translation, the yin literally means “dark” but has the
connotation of being gentle, slender, weak, and feminine, epitomized by
the moon. The yang, on the other hand, literally means “bright” and has
the connotation of being forceful, virile, strong, and masculine, epito-
mised by the sun. Achieving harmony between the yin and the yang is
essential for the synchronization of the five organs, and the synergy
helps to maintain normal functioning and hence physical health.
Illnesses are construed as a disharmony between these two opposing
constructs. The corollary of this thesis is that in the event of any
malfunctioning in the bodily organs, the cure would be to restore the
yin–yang balance.
The TCM principle also views physical ailment as the result of the
body being inflicted by excessive internal “fire,” versus excessive internal
“coldness.” Moreover, the unwanted presence of “wetness” and other
body “toxins” will result in ill health. The practice of TCM, therefore, is
to have a correct diagnosis of such internal states and to skillfully manipu-
late a cocktail of herbal preparation to restore harmony and to rid the body
of unwanted toxins. The internal bodily states are also regulated by the
forces of xie, which literally means “blood”; and qi (pronounced “chi”),
which is a word meaning “air” but connotes “internal spirit.” To ensure
good health, both the xie and the qi need to be active and regulated.
Stimulation, and thus regulation, of the xie and the qi can be effected by
TCM herbals or the stimulation of the acupuncture points located with
some precision on the bodily meridians plotted out in the Medical
Principles of the Yellow Emperor. If so-wished, the xie can also be
enhanced by physical exercise; the qi can be enhanced by practicing qi
gong, which literally means “qi exercises.” The positive effects of qi gong
have been reported in a few studies, but some clinicians have cautioned
against untoward psychological disorders and other problems resulting
from misuse of qi gong.19
What has transpired from this washed-down exposition of TCM princi-
ples is the basic assumption that all bodily ailments (illnesses and diseases
included) can be traced to an imbalance between a number of coexisting
but opposing hypothetical constructs such as the yin versus the yang, fire
versus coldness, and so on. TCM prescriptions and other physical forms
of treatment were initiated with the aim of restoring the balance between
these constructs and enhancing the xie and the qi activities. When these
are achieved, harmony will be restored, symptoms will vanish, and the
patient will become well.
TCM holds the viewpoint that mentality is a psychological capacity of
regulating a reciprocal balance of physiological and emotional activities.
Excessive and prolonged emotional activities may result in the imbalance
of both and then develop as an important pathogenesis, which is widely
involved in the development of various psychological and physical
impairments. For example, if one is in prolonged sorrow, his or her mind
will be restless, resulting in uneasiness of the internal organs.27 Clinically,
TCM diagnoses of mental–emotional conditions could be made on the
basis of TCM diagnostic principles and syndrome differentiations
through the Four Diagnostic Approaches, consisting of inspection, aus-
cultation and olfaction, inquiry, and palpation. An apparent therapeutic
advantage of TCM for mental–emotional conditions is individualized
treatment strategy, in which formulation of herbal medicine and acupunc-
ture points is based on the individual diagnosis made and the different
stages of condition development. For example, for those who are diag-
nosed as excessive emotional activities with anxiousness, herbal medi-
cines and acupoints that could reduce emotional excessiveness and calm
down anxious mood are applied. For those who manifest depressive mood
with low energy, fatigue, and poor concentration, herbal medicines and
acupoints that could heighten mood status and reinforce the energy may
be used.
Because excessive worries and anxiousness are the most common
emotional responses to extremely rapid and radical social changes in
today’s society, three mental–emotional syndromes are frequently observed
possession states. The very nature of such culture renders the church
leader a pivotal position in the pathway to mental health care. Mutual
respect, communication, and collaboration with the church leaders and
the traditional healers are therefore extremely important in early
intervention of mental health problems and promoting acceptance of
mainstream mental health care.
3. CONCLUSION
Some of the reasons cited for the use of traditional healing include
lower incidence of side effects, perceived effectiveness, a desire for
egalitarian relationships with medical practitioners, a holistic approach
4. KEY POINTS
5. SELF-ASSESSMENT
5.1. What are the three essential components of evidence-based
medicine as suggested by Sackett?18
Answer: Best research practice, experience and skills of practitioners, and
patients’ values.
6. CASE STUDIES
6.1. Obeah
A 21-year-old male patient was admitted through the casualty depart-
ment into the psychiatric ward. According to the report of his mother,
the patient had complained about being haunted by ghosts for the past
three months. He felt that his thoughts and actions were under the con-
trol of the evil spirits. His experience of hearing a male voice threaten-
ing him at night confirmed his belief that he was being possessed. The
attending psychiatrist conducted a thorough psychiatric interview and
made a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia on the basis of the presence
of bizarre delusions and second-person auditory hallucinations. The
attending psychiatrist explained the diagnosis, the dopamine theory of
psychosis, and the treatment plan to the patient and his mother. The
patient’s mother immediately demanded he be discharged, because she
believed that those abnormal phenomena were due to ghosts and would
prefer exorcism by Obeah. The attending psychiatrist was trained in
Western medicine and dismissed Obeah as some kind of witchcraft;
thus, the patient and his mother were eventually discharged against
medical advice.
The patient underwent a ritual of exorcism, leading to a reduction in
anxiety and in severity of abnormal experience. However, a few days later,
the symptoms recurred to such an extent that the patient followed the
voice, which commanded him to slash his wrist. During the second
admission, the attending psychiatrist took a more thorough psychosocial
history, which revealed that before the onset of psychosis, the patient’s
mother had just driven away his father’s mistress from the home. His
mother believed that his illness was related to magical spells cast upon
him by the mistress. She therefore believed that exorcism was the best
method to drive away the evil spirits. The attending psychiatrist then spent
time to explain to the patient’s mother about the relation between occur-
rence of the life event (family discord) with the onset of such psychotic
symptoms, the effect of anxiety upon the severity of the symptoms, as
well as affirming the anxiety-reducing value of Obeah. Both the patient
and his mother became more accepting of the stress-related hypothesis of
his illness. There was also improvement in mutual rapport with associated
acceptance of medication in reducing his anxiety and psychotic
symptoms.
of Chai Hu Shu Gan Tang (柴胡疏肝湯) and Xiao Yao San (逍遙散) and
Dan Sen (丹蔘), Yu Jin (郁金), Chao Zao Ren (炒棗仁). By her next fol-
low up after taking the Chinese herbal decoction for nine days, her
depressive condition had greatly improved with better sleep quality and
improved appetite. With further counseling and reassurance from the
Practitioner, the patient had gained more confidence in Chinese Medicine.
With an additional prescription of 15 days of 30 g of Huang Zhe (北茋)
and 15 g of Wu Wei Zi (五味子) to reinforce the qi and Blood, the patient
called the clinic and reported significant improvement in her depressive
symptoms. With further emphasis on cultivating good mental health and
continuous intake of Xiao Yao San (逍遙散), the patient eventually recov-
ered without any recurrence.
REFERENCES
1. Campion J, Bhugra D. (1997) Experiences of religious healing in psychiatric
patients in South India. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 32: 215–221.
2. Chae Y, Yeom M. (2008) Effect of acupuncture on anxiety-like behavior
during nicotine withdrawal and relevant mechanisms. Neurosci Lett 430:
98–102.
3. Chopra A, Doiphode VV. (2002) Ayurvedic medicine: Core concept, thera-
peutic principles, and current relevance. Med Clin North Am 86: 75–89.
4. Dalrymple W. (1994) City of Djinns — A Year in Delhi, Flamingo, Harper
Collins, London.
5. Dein S. (1997) ABC of mental health: Mental health in a multi-ethnic
society. Br Med J 315: 473–476.
6. Dein S. Lipsedge M. (2001) Negotiating across class, culture and religion:
Psychiatry in the English inner city. In: Okapu SO (ed.), Clinical Methods in
Transcultural Psychiatry, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.
7. Ernst E. (2000) The role of complementary and alternative medicine. Br Med J
321: 1133–1135.
8. Glass-Coffin B. (2010) Anthropology, Shamanism and alternative ways of
knowing — a way of being. Anthropology Humanism 35: 204–270.
9. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. (1999) Acceptance and Commitment
Therapy. An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change, Guildford Press,
NY.
10. Healy M, Aslam M. (1990) The Asian Community: Medicine and Traditions.
Amadeus Press, Huddersfield, UK.
11. Loewenthal KM, Cinirella M. (2003) Religious issues in ethnic minority
mental health with special reference to schizophrenia in Afro–Caribbean in
Britain: A systematic review. In: Ndegewa D, Olajide D (eds.), Main Issues
in Mental Health and Race, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot.
12. Lu L, Liu IY. (2009) Traditional medicine in the treatment of drug addiction.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 35: 1–11.
13. Matko M. (2004) Complementary and alternative medicine — a measure of
crisis in academic medicine. Croatian Med J 45: 684–688.
14. Mbiti JS. (1969) African Religions and Philosophy, Heinemann, London.
15. Mnyandu M. (1997) Ubuntu as the basis of authenic humanity: An African
Christian perspective. J Constructive Theology 33: 77–91.
16. Nolen-Hoeksema S. (2000) Role of rumination in depressive disorder and
mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Abnormal J Psychol 109: 504–511.
17. Rogers TA. (2010) Exploring health beliefs and care seeking behavior of the
older USA-dwelling Mexicans and Mexican Americans. Ethnicity Health 15:
581–599.
18. Sackett DL, Strauss SE, Scott Richardson W, et al. (2000) Evidence-based
Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, Churchill Livingstone,
Philadelphia, PA.
19. San HH, Yan WW, Yan HQ. (1990) Mental hygiene problems of QiGong. Inf
Psychol Sci 6: 41–43. (in Chinese).
20. Tonelli MR, Callahan TC. (2001) Why alternative medicine cannot be
evidence-based. Acad Med 76: 1213–1220.
21. Turner B. (2003) Social capital, health and inequalities: A Durkheimian
revival. Soc Theory Health 1: 4–20.
22. Vincent C, Furham A. (1997) Complementary Medicine: A Research
Perspective, John Wiley & Sons, Chicester.
23. Wells A. (2007) The attentional training control technique: Theory, effects
and meta-cognitive hypothesis on auditory hallucinations. Cognitive Behav
Pract 14: 134–138.
24. Werneke U, Turner T, Priebe S. (2006) Complementary alternative medi-
cine in psychiatry: A comprehensive review of effectiveness and safety.
Br J Psychiatry 188: 109–121.
25. Williams JMG, Teasdale JD, Segal Z, Kabat-Zinn J. (2007) The Mindful Way
Through Depression. Guidlford Press, NY.
26. World Health Organization. (2000) Cross-national comparsions of the preva-
lence and correlates of mental disorders. WHO Int Consort Psychiatr
Epidemiol, 78: 413–426.
27. Wu LN, Wu QA. (1997) Yellow Emperor’s Canon of Internal Medicine,
China Science and Technology Press, Beijing.
28. Zhang ZJ, Chen HY, Yip KC, Ng R, Wong V. (2009) The effectiveness and
safety of acupuncture therapy in depressive disorders: Systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 24: 9–21.
Chapter 33
1. INTRODUCTION
Homelessness is a social issue present in all nations. It is not a diagnosis,
nor is it necessarily correlated with any single diagnosis. Rather, it is a
social situation with multifactorial causes and correlations. Because this
complicated societal issue is so often correlated with mental illnesses and
substance abuse disorders, it warrants special mention in this volume.
Homelessness is a social justice issue often related to poverty, unem-
ployment, and the lack of affordable health/mental health care. It is also
highly correlated with political issues like war, family system issues like
orphanhood and domestic violence, and legal issues such as the reentry of
prisoners into society. Social systems issues are often an overarching fac-
tor predicating the condition of homelessness. Mental illness alone does
not cause an individual to be homeless. Mental illness and substance
abuse are major risk factors for homelessness. The burden of mental ill-
ness often will be the key issue, when added to other social risk factors,
leading to chronic homelessness. The correlation between homelessness
and mental illness is staggering. With all other variables equal, people
with mental illness are hugely vulnerable to the condition of homelessness
relative to those without mental illness.
841
2. DEFINITIONS
The United Nations discusses housing in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights as a basic Human Right, thus defining homelessness as an
international social justice issue: “Everyone has the right to a standard of
living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family,
including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social
services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness,
disability, widowhood, old age, or other lack of livelihood in circum-
stances beyond his control.”
But the definition of homelessness remains a topic of debate.
Socioeconomic and political realities will challenge definitions for the
homeless problem from one country situation to another. “Homelessness”
defined in post-earthquake Port-au-Prince may place emphasis on differ-
ent factors when compared to “homelessness” in Paris or New York City.
Likewise, a schizophrenic “street person” in Los Angeles will have a dif-
ferent set of definitions as compared to a “street orphan” in Zimbabwe,
though both will satisfy most definitions of “homelessness.”
There are many different definitions for homelessness, and there is no
internationally recognized absolute standard definition. Rather, a spec-
trum of definitions exists between narrow and wide concepts for home-
lessness. At one end of this continuum, homeless is defined as simply the
absence of shelter in the literal sense. Many feel that this is too restrictive
of a definition and that a broader context of social situations must be
intrinsic to any meaningful definition.
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
defines a “chronically homeless” person as “an unaccompanied homeless
individual with a disabling condition who has either been continuously
homeless for a year or more, or has had at least four episodes of home-
lessness in the past three years.” Many other systems use a similar
definition.
The lack of clarity around the definition can make consensus in epide-
miology ambiguous. Nevertheless, it seems that the conceptual framework
of the problem seems to be more similar between nations with similar
political and socioeconomic situations.
3. EPIDEMIOLOGY
Because the valence of homelessness varies with socioeconomic situa-
tion, and because homelessness is a sensitive issue in some cultures, the
degree to which the topic has been studied and documented differs widely
from country to country. The greatest volume of research on homeless-
ness comes from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France,
and Australia.44 Few credible estimates exist regarding the size of the
homeless population in different countries. In general, studies suggest
that 6%–8% of Americans can expect to be homeless at some point in
their lives, 1% in any given year.44 The number is comparable in the
United Kingdom, and lower in Italy (4% lifetime prevalence per Toro44),
Belgium (3.4% in the same study), and Germany (2.4% in the same
study). In many developing countries, the numbers are much higher —
sometimes too high to reliably quantify. A study in Brazil suggests
that nearly one-third of the population lives in conditions that fall under
a loose definition of homelessness described as “miserable living
conditions.”18 In some cities in sub-Saharan Africa, it is estimated that as
much as 60% of the population lives in crowded, informal, and often
illegal slum or squatter settlements, without water, sanitation, waste dis-
posal, or job opportunities.34
Homeless people fall into three key groups: homeless families, home-
less youths, and homeless single adults. These groups have largely distinct
social services and research literatures.
Homeless families are typically single mothers with one or more young
children, often under the age of five. They tend to be homeless for reasons
of extreme poverty, loss of benefits, eviction, or domestic violence. They
are rarely found on the streets and are mostly housed in shelters or dou-
bled up with friends or family. In the past, among developed countries,
this has been noted to be a predominantly American phenomenon, dispro-
portionate among African Americans or other ethnic minorities. However,
the number of homeless families may be on the rise in Europe, especially
in nations with immigration from conflict-torn or poverty-stricken nearby
regions.44 Families made homeless by forced eviction are also documented
in major urban areas in Africa.34
which they had been unconscious for 30 mins or longer. Around 70% of
these injuries had occurred before homelessness.20 A number of studies
in the United States also suggest high levels of traumatic brain injury,
48%–82%, among homeless people.27 Moderate or severe traumatic brain
injury is associated with higher likelihood of poor mental and physical
health, as well as more drug problems.
4.8. Comorbidities
Comorbidity is a common finding across countries among homeless
individuals with mental illness. In general, the most common combi-
nation is alcohol dependence with other substance use and/or mood
disorders.
1800s, the efforts of Chiarugi and Pinel15,29 propelled the “moral move-
ment” in psychiatry urging more humanitarian care for those suffering
from mental illnesses. By the end of the 19th century, institutional systems
and asylums began to develop on a more widespread basis for these pur-
poses.19 Severely mentally ill persons who otherwise would have been
homeless, jailed, or in the poorhouses of the day began instead to be
directed into such facilities. Multiple factors, however, including lack of
public investment and resources, segregation from society and lack of
oversight caused these systems to deteriorate, leading to inhumane condi-
tions, and human rights violations, and humanitarian calls began to swing
back against institutionalization as a result.19 Deinstitutionalization efforts
increased and began to peak in the mid-20th century and have dominated
the policies of most Western countries since. Circumstances in the devel-
oping world may crudely mirror these historical patterns.42 As the deinsti-
tutionalization movement has proceeded, however, it has not been without
much controversy. Many of the more vulnerable appear again to be “fall-
ing through the cracks” as many communities have been poorly equipped
to deal with the needs of the severely mentally ill who comprise a large
percentage of homeless persons. Intense and vigorous debate occurs
between proponents of autonomy and paternalism.8,19,23
As cultural conceptualizations of the causes of homelessness and men-
tal illness have shifted over time, these persons’ places in competition for
scarce societal resources and considerations for humanitarian assistance
have shifted. Causal conceptual models have ranged from moral depravity
to more complex social, psychological, and biological models in which
disadvantage results from many factors, not all within the control of the
consciousness and will of the affected person. Conceptual models of
moral depravity have resulted in isolation and shunning of disadvantaged
persons. Deterministic environmental and biological models have caused
such persons to be viewed as objects of compassion and pity rather than
of evil or laziness. These models however may run the risk of over objec-
tification and may foster an unhealthy paternalism, lack of personal
agency, and cause harm. Other contemporary models may view disadvan-
taged persons as equals deserving of social and environmental opportuni-
ties to practice autonomy and responsibility. These models may under
appreciate the unique vulnerabilities of persons with biological conditions
Intensive case management via ACT for persons with severe mental
illness appeared to have significant advantages over standard care in this
systematic review of previous trials.7 When intensive case management
was compared to standard care, those in the intensive case management
group were significantly more likely to stay with the service, have
improved general functioning, get a job, not be homeless, and have shorter
stays in the hospital (especially when they had had very long hospitaliza-
tions previously). There was also a suggestion that it reduced the risk of
death and suicide. If intensive case management was compared to other
case management with >20 clients per case manager (non-intensive case
management), the only clear difference was that those in the intensive case
management group were more likely to remain in care. There were no tri-
als comparing non-intensive case management with standard care or insti-
tutional care. It remains uncertain if intensive case management is
significantly better than other models of case management with a higher
caseload per case manager or institutional care and thus these remain top-
ics for further investigation. Another meta-analysis6 found advantages
for ACT over standard case management. In the randomized trials
included in this meta-analysis, ACT treatment subjects demonstrated a
greater reduction in homelessness and greater improvement in psychiatric
symptom severity compared with standard case management treatments.
Hospitalization outcomes were not found to be significantly different
between the two groups in the studies included in this review however.
greater decreases in substance use than usual care. For homeless people
with latent tuberculosis, monetary incentives were found to have improved
adherence rates with treatment. The authors noted that although a number
of studies comparing an intervention to usual care were positive, studies
comparing two interventions frequently found no significant difference in
outcomes. The authors concluded overall that coordinated treatment pro-
grams for homeless adults with mental illness or substance abuse usually
resulted in better health outcomes than usual care and felt that health care
for homeless people should be provided through such programs whenever
possible. They found that research was lacking on interventions for
youths, families, and conditions other than mental illness or substance
abuse.
6. SUMMARY
Assessing the effectiveness of efforts to conceptualize and assist home-
less persons internationally is challenging. There are varying conceptual
models of what homelessness is, there are varying social, political, and
historical contexts in which homelessness occurs which may shift dra-
matically over short periods of time even in the same geographic locale.
Homelessness is likely to have multiple diverse causative factors.
Conceptualizations of the needs of homeless persons may vary greatly
depending upon these factors. How to measure the need of homeless per-
sons is not universally agreed upon, and there are varying intervention
models which have been proposed which may not easily generalize out-
side of the unique circumstances where they have been implemented.
Resources for gathering information, developing interventions, and track-
ing outcomes vary substantially from region to region. The homeless
population by its very nature is difficult to study as a result of factors such
as loss of follow-up making strong inferences from research challenging.
Only a limited number of interventions and outcomes have been tested
rigorously and few non-Western cultures have been represented in this
literature.
Future research should include prospective studies to elucidate the risk
factors into and out of homelessness and suggest targets for randomized
controlled trials to support the many needs of homeless persons. The inter-
ventions literature from Western populations does seem to support the
effectiveness of ACT versus usual care for those with severe mental illness
in the context of deinstitutionalization. Current usual care community and
hospital service delivery models do not meet the needs of many homeless
people who suffer from high prevalence rates of mental illness, personal-
ity disorders, and alcohol and drug dependence. Integrated approaches to
treatment which incorporate intensive case management to support mental
health, alcohol and drug abuse, welfare, and housing needs may be benefi-
cial. Harm reduction approaches may offer promise and randomized con-
trolled trials may assist in further delineating the risks and benefits of
these approaches and for whom they are most likely to be favorable.
Children and adolescents are understudied vulnerable populations.
Research may be particularly important in non-Western populations
where there appears to be very limited information. The broadest context
of history must be considered carefully as the tension between autonomy,
responsibility and paternalism results in a potential for pendular swings in
policy.
7.1. Government
From the standpoint of government, a policy on homelessness (or lack
thereof ) is a critical variable. The stated, official stance on this social issue
may predict for the pragmatic supports (or lack of supports) of money and
social resource connections that will make the phenomena more or less
common and will change likely outcomes for those affected. After policy,
the amount of available real resources for homeless and at risk for home-
lessness will predict the epidemiology and the outcomes.
How governments handle the issue of access to public health, mental
health, and substance abuse treatment will have critical bearing on the
possibilities and outcomes for many persons affected by homelessness.
Without access to care, a core risk factor for homelessness like mental
illness remains unabated. Also, social welfare access and public policy
around disabilities will have huge relevant relation over outcome.
Another governmental factor that is important affecting homelessness
among mentally ill populations is the laws around involuntary commit-
ment and state conservatorship. Each country has its own set of laws that
attempt to make a reasonable balance between the autonomy of mentally
ill persons and insurance of the protection of their wellness. The nature
of these laws may result in more or less state oversight of the chroni-
cally mentally ill and therefore more or less mentally ill persons
institutionalized.
A prime example of the complex nature of how these systems interface
to predict rates of homelessness is seen in the recent history of deinstitu-
tionalization movements in Western countries. The deinstitutionalization
movement provides insight into the level of complexity with which the
social variables interact to predict rates of homelessness. In this move-
ment toward community-based treatment of mental illness, commitment
laws were challenged as well as public attitudes around mental illness and
its proposed social solutions. In the United States, the movement began
in the context of a larger Civil Rights push and it emphasized the auton-
omy and basic rights of mentally ill persons and criticized the poor condi-
tions in institutional settings at the time. But deinstitutionalization was
(and still is) also an economic reaction to shrinking financial resources
for mental health treatment. There is financial incentive and, therefore,
political motivation in reducing institutions. So the outcomes from the
movement also highlight the very real correlations between reduced over-
all financial services for mentally ill persons and increased rates of
homelessness.14
8. KEY POINTS
9. SELF-ASSESSMENT
9.1. What diagnoses account for the majority of psychiatric
disorders among homeless people?
(A) Substance use disorders.
(B) Psychotic disorders.
(C) Mood disorders.
(D) Traumatic brain injury.
(E) Antisocial personality disorder.
Answer: A
him. He sees cars on the street that he believes are following him. He
exhibits limited coping skills with stressors and has been unemployed and
low functioning since age eighteen, markedly below his previous level of
function. He has been in and out of various shelters despite multiple fam-
ily efforts toward assistance. When his family has attempted to assist him
he has become fearful, impulsive, erratic, and becomes very hostile and
threatening toward them. He then elopes from their care. He has been
homeless for several years now despite their repeated efforts at obtaining
assistance for him via multiple hospital admissions and appeals to various
government health agencies. He has had extreme difficulty in providing
for self care after hospital discharge and his function has never returned to
levels achieved prior to the age of 18. He does not remain in any particular
shelter for any prolonged period of time, nor does he follow up with out-
patient clinical appointments for either medical or psychiatric care. He is
not compliant with medications. He has had periods of depressive symp-
toms, suicidal ideation and attempts during active psychotic periods how-
ever the total duration of depressive symptoms has been brief relative to
the active and residual periods of psychosis. He has had no known manic
symptoms. He has a well-established diagnosis of polysubstance depend-
ence (alcohol, marijuana, crack cocaine, and amphetamine) likely exacer-
bating his symptoms. His psychotic symptoms do not appear to remit even
in several month-to-two month long periods of prolonged abstinence from
illicit substances during observed inpatient hospitalizations. He has a sei-
zure disorder and has been poorly compliant with his anti-epileptic regi-
men. His psychotic symptoms appear independent of his seizures which
are not considered causative for his mental status changes per neurologi-
cal consultation and his symptoms are most consistent with a DSM-IVTR
diagnosis of chronic paranoid schizophrenia.
REFERENCES
1. Acorn S. (1993) Mental and physical health of homeless persons who use
emergency shelters in vancouver. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 44: 854–857.
2. Altena AM, Brilleslijper-Kater SN, et al. (2010) Effective interventions for
homeless youth: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 38(6): 637–645.
3. Barrow SM, Herman DB, et al. (1999) Mortality among homeless shelter
residents in New York city. Am J Public Health 89(4): 529–534.
4. Burra TA, Stergiopoulos V, Rourke SB. (2009) A systematic review of
cognitive deficits in homeless adults: Implications for service delivery.
Can J Psychiatry 54(2): 123–133.
5. Chan S, Chin M, Chang J, Luecha A, Cheng E, Schlesinger J, et al. (2002)
Cancer risk behaviors and screening rates among homeless adults in Los
Angeles County. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(5): 431–438.
6. Coldwell CM, Bender WS. (2007) The effectiveness of assertive community
treatment for homeless populations with severe mental illness: A meta-
analysis. Am J Psychiatry 164(3): 393–399.
7. Dieterich M, Irving CB, et al. (2010) Intensive case management for severe
mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD007906.
8. Fakhoury W, Priebe S. (2002) The process of deinstitutionalization: An inter-
national overview. Curr Opin Psychiatry 15(2): 187–192.
9. Farr RK, Koegel P, Burnam A. (1986) A Study of Homelessness and Mental
Illness in the Skid Row Area of Los Angeles: A Report to NIMH, National
Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD.
10. Fazel S, Khosla V, et al. (2008) The prevalence of mental disorders among
the homeless in Western countries: Systematic review and meta-regression
analysis. PLoS Med 5(12): e225.
11. Fichter MM, Quadflieg N. (2001) Prevalence of mental illness in homeless
men in Munich, Germany: Results from a representative sample. Acta
Psychiatr Scand 103: 94–104.
12. Fountain J, Howes S, Marsden J, Taylor C, Strang J. (2003) Drug and alcohol
use and the link with homelessness: Results from a survey of homeless
people in London. Addict Res Theory 11(4): 245–256.
13. Fountain J, Howes S, Strang G. (2003) Unmet drug and alcohol service needs
of homeless people in London: A complex issue. Subst Use Misuse 38:
377–393.
14. Friedman, Michael B. (2003) Keeping the promise of community mental
health. The Journal News.
15. Gerard DL. (1997) Chiarugi and Pinel considered: Soul’s brain/person’s
mind. J Hist Behav Sci 33(4): 381–403.
16. Greenberg G, Rosenheck R. (2008) Jail, incarcaration, homelessness,
A national survey. Psychiatr Serv: 170–177.
17. Han O, Lee HB, Ahn J, Park J, Cho M, Hong J, Hahm B, Kim C. (2003)
Lifetime and current prevalence of mental disorders among homeless men in
Korea. J Nerv Ment Dis 191(4): 272–275.
18. Heckert U, Andrade L, Alves MJM, Martins C. (1999) Lifetime prevalence
of mental disorders among homeless people in a southeast city in Brazil.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 249(3): 150–155.
19. Huey LY, Ford JD, et al. (2009) 55.1 Public and community psychiatry,
historical perspective overview. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P (eds.),
Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
20. Hwang SW, Colantonio A, Chiu S, Tolomiczenko G, Kiss A, Cowan L,
Redelmeier DA, Levinson W. (2008) The effect of traumatic brain injury on
the health of homeless people. Can Med Assoc J 179(8): 779–784.
21. Israel N, Toro Pa, Ouellette N. (2010) Changes in the composition of the
homeless population: 1992–2002. Am J Community Psychol 46: 49–59.
22. Kertesz SG, Weiner SJ. (2009) Housing the chronically homeless: High
hopes, complex realities. JAMA 301(17): 1822–1824.
23. Lamb HR, Bachrach LL. (2001) Some perspectives on deinstitutionalization.
Psychiatr Serv 52(8): 1039–1045.
24. Larimer ME, Malone DK, et al. (2009) Health care and public service use
and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless
persons with severe alcohol problems. JAMA 301(13): 1349–1357.
25. Maniglio R. (2009) Severe mental illness and criminal victimization:
A systematic review. Acta Psychiat Scand 119(3): 180–191.
26. Marlatt GA. (2002) Harm Reduction: Pragmatic Strategies for Managing
High-Risk Behaviors, Guilford Press, NY.
27. MacReady N. (2009) Neurological deficits in the homeless: A downward
spiral. Lancet Neurol 8(3): 228–229.
28. McGraw S, Larson M, et al. (2010) Adopting best practices: Lessons learned
in the collaborative initiative to help end chronic homelessness (CICH).
J Behav Health Serv Res 37: 197–212.
29. Mora G. (1959) Vincenzo Chiarugi (1759–1820) and his psychiatric reform
in florence in the late 18th century. J Hist Med Allied Sci XIV(10): 424–433.
30. Morrison DS. (2009) Homelessness as an independent risk factor for mortal-
ity: Results from a retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 38(3): 877–883.
31. North CS, Eyrich KM, Pollio DE, Spitznagel EL. (2004) Are rates of psychi-
atric disorders in the homeless population changing? Am J Public Health
94(1): 103–108.
32. North CS, Pollio DE, Thompson SJ, Spitznagel EL, Smith EM. (1998) The
association of psychiatric diagnosis with weather conditions in a large urban
homeless sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 33(5): 206–210.
33. North CS, Smith EM, Spitznagel EL. (1993) Is anti-social personality disor-
der a valid diagnosis among the homeless? Am J Psychiatry 150: 578–58.
34. Ochola L. (1996) Eviction and homelessness: The impact on African
Children. Dev Prac 6(4): 340–347.
35. Okamoto Y. (2007) A comparative study of homelessness in the
United Kingdom and Japan. J Soc Issues 63(3): 525–542.
36. O’Toole TP, Gibbon JL, Hanusa BH, Freyder PJ, Conde AM, Fine MJ.
(2004) Self-reported changes in drug and alcohol use after becoming home-
less. Am J Public Health 94(5): 830–883.
37. Philippot P, Lecocq C, Sempoux F, Nachtergael H, Galand B. (2007)
Psychological research on homelessness in Western Europe: A review from
1970 to 2001. J Soc Issues 63: 483–504.
38. Podymow T, Turnbull J, et al. (2006) Shelter-based managed alcohol admin-
istration to chronically homeless people addicted to alcohol. Can Med Assoc
J 174(1): 45–49.
39. Pollio DE, Eyrich-Garg KM, North CS. (2010) The homeless. In: Johnson
BA (ed.), Addiction Medicine: Science and Practice, pp. 1487–1504,
Springer, NY.
40. Sadowski LS, Kee RA et al. (2009) Effect of a housing and case management
program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chron-
ically Ill homeless adults: A randomized trial. JAMA 301(17): 1771–1778.
41. Salkow K, Fichter M. (2003) Homelessness and mental illness. Curr Opin
Psychiatry 16: 467–471.
42. Sontag D. (2010) In Haiti, mental health system is in collapse. The New York
Times. New York: A1.
43. Stein LI, Test MA. (1980) Alternative to mental hospital treatment: I. concep-
tual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Arch Gen Psychiatry
37(4): 392–397.
44. Toro PA. (2007) Toward an international understanding of homelessness.
J Soc Issues 63: 461–481.
45. Tsemberis S, Gulcur L, et al. (2004) Housing first, consumer choice, and
harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. Am J Public
Health 94(4): 651–656.
Chapter 34
1. INTRODUCTION
Armed conflicts occur today in many countries, resulting in death and
disability. They also have far-reaching mental health consequences for
everyone involved, from soldiers to civilians. Armed conflicts can include
wars, terrorism, and other violent political conflicts or violence perpe-
trated by the state such as genocide, torture, kidnapping, or other human
rights abuses.13
The destruction from wars is usually measured by the number of lives
lost, by statistics around the number of people crippled, or by monetary
values of property damaged. Beyond the physical and structural damage
calculated in the reported statistics, there is an ever-increasing understand-
ing of the consequences on individual and mass psychology.3 The psycho-
logical consequences are often misunderstood and often overlooked. But
they are present, important, and destructive.
Mental health consequence of war is an internationally important issue
because the number of conflicts in the latter part of the 20th century
increased, especially in developing countries. These conflicts also tended
to be within states rather than between them. Frequently these are coun-
tries whose social services, infrastructure, and political systems are
865
health disorders like PTSD and depression. People with PTSD are also
more likely to have and develop alcohol abuse problems. Women who
have experienced trauma have a higher risk of developing alcohol depend-
ence whether or not they have PTSD.24 Other major, problematic social
issues like domestic violence increase after war.32 It is also known that the
perpetration of violence is more common for persons affected by PTSD.
While there is not necessarily a causal link between the violence of war
and these outcomes, the correlation is clear and the connection is not dif-
ficult to understand.
experience traumas.6 People find themselves not only at risk for death but
for other traumatic experiences such as witnessing death, rape, torture,
displacement, and kidnapping.
Risk factors for development of PTSD are many, and in general the
effect sizes reported in the literature for various factors are modest.5 PTSD
is a heterogeneous disorder and no one factor results in development of the
illness. Psychosocial risk factors for developing PTSD include those related
to the individual’s susceptibility, the traumatic event itself, and the circum-
stances that surround the individual afterwards. War promotes these risk
factors by increasing likelihood of exposure to traumas, including the pos-
sibility of repeated exposures. It also creates an environment of chaos that
negatively impacts the stability of the environment in which victims find
themselves in afterwards. Table 1 lists several common risk factors.
4.1. Afghanistan
Afghanistan is a country that has experienced conflict for over two
decades, resulting in the displacement of a large segment of the popula-
tion, loss of life, and loss of security for surviving civilians. Two recent
studies found high rates of experience of multiple traumas and high levels
of psychiatric symptoms. The first study found a rate of PTSD of 42% and
that men and the disabled had a poorer mental health status.7 A second
study found the rate of PTSD to be about 20.4%. High rates of symptoms
were associated with higher numbers of traumatic events experienced.
Table 2. Rates of DSM disorders (%) in people both with and without
exposure to armed conflict associated violence.9
PTSD Mood d/o Anxiety d/o Somatoform d/o
Algeria 37.4 22.7 37.2 8.3
Cambodia 28.4 11.5 40.0 1.6
Ethiopia 15.8 9.4 13.5 5.3
Gaza Strip 17.8 9.4 13.5 5.3
Women had higher rates than men. The main sources of emotional support
were religion and family.25
4.3. Chechnya
The human rights abuses that took place in the recent conflict between
Russian and Chechnya deeply affected Chechen population and troubled
human rights groups around the world. Several studies have evaluated
asylum seekers as well as internally displaced people. In one recent study,
a survey was given to displaced people living in settlements, and revealed
that two-thirds experienced emotional disturbance and upset and almost
all reportedly had non-specific complaints such as somatic complaints,
anxiety, insomnia, depressive feelings, or social dysfunction.10
4.4. Iraq
There have been many conflicts in Iraq in the last 50 years, but few studies
have been conducted on their impact on mental health. One small study of
45 internally displaced Kurdish families living in camps in northern Iraq
five years after attacks in 1988 found that 87% of children and 60% of
their caregivers had PTSD.1
4.5. Israel
In the context of the longstanding ongoing conflicts within the country,
Israel has experienced bouts of violence for many years. A study in 2003
found that of subjects who have had exposure to conflict-related trauma,
76.7% had at least one traumatic stress-related symptom and 9.4% met the
criteria for acute stress disorder.4
4.6. Lebanon
A civil war lasting from 1975 to 1990 as well as several invasions by Israel
has led to several studies evaluating mental health outcomes of war in this
country. In one 1998 study of 658 people exposed to war, the lifetime
prevalence of major depression ranged from 16.3–41.9%. Predictors of
depression included prior history of depression and exposure to war.12
4.8. Rwanda
Survivors of the Rwandan genocide in 1994 have contended with severe
mental and physical health consequences. A community-based study of
2,091 subjects found that about 24.8% met the criteria for PTSD, with the
odds of meeting the PTSD criteria increasing by 1.43 for each additional
traumatic event experienced.20
the Tamil minority population that has persisted over the last several dec-
ades. In addition, the conflict has recently left thousands of civilians dis-
placed. One epidemiological survey in Sri Lanka looking at the
psychological effects on civilians found that in the population, PTSD was
present in 27%, somatization in 41%, anxiety disorder in 26%, and major
depression in 25%. Drug and alcohol misuse was found in 15% and func-
tional disability in 18% of the population. They also found that only 6%
of the population had not experienced any war stresses.27
4.10. Somalia
Since 1991 the Somali civil war has resulted in millions of civilian deaths
and civilian displacement. A study from UNICEF investigated 10,000
children and found a high proportion of them experienced psychological
effects from the prolonged conflict.31
Each in this short list of examples of countries with recent or current
political conflict demonstrates several similarities. War and conflict
increases risks for negative mental health outcomes. Mental health disor-
ders are grossly exaggerated in these countries compared to countries
without the war related risks. These examples also expose varying degrees
of the limits of access to mental health resources.
criteria for PTSD does not make the stress or suffering or the risks for its
consequences on human behavior any less real. It is difficult to quantify
the suffering from victimization or from having to establish a new life and
sense of normalcy after losing most or all of one’s family members,
having to flee from home and community, frequently into a foreign land,
and facing years of life in refugee camps.
The consequences of war can create different outcomes for different
people. Grief and loss are internalized psychologically in different ways,
but usually result in suffering and anguish. Specific violations and
personal injuries from war can cause intense anger, hatred, and resentment
or disillusionment and the inability to trust. These psychological changes
are difficult to measure and report on, but negatively affect people’s lives,
relationships, and behaviors.
“The health impact of political violence and wars should be examined not
only along the lines of sheer number of casualties and trauma-related dis-
orders among survivors, but also on the individual and collective levels.
Indirect effects such as disintegration of the family and social networks,
disruption of the local economies, dislocation of food production systems
and exodus of the work force have profound implications in the health and
well-being of survivors.”19
6.1. Genocide
Genocide has become an international concern that has occurred with fre-
quency throughout the 20th century and into the 21st. Genocide includes a
primary terrorization of a targeted group. That group usually suffers from a
general violent oppression during the violence. Survivors of genocide have
been targets of murder and usually have been heavily exposed to violence.
They carry a heavy burden of trauma exposure and multiple losses. They
also tend to have among the highest incidences of mental health disorders.
6.2. Torture
Torture is a widely practiced weapon used in war and state-sponsored
political violence. Torture is generally used as a mechanism of terror. As
such, victims’ psychology is a major target of the violence in torture. In
fact, torture is often designed specifically to fit an individual or a particu-
lar ethnic group to maximize the psychological impact. Torture is among
the most highly correlated to the development of PTSD and other mental
health disorders.
8. DEMOGRAPHICS OF POPULATIONS
AT RISK IN WAR SETTINGS
Wars disproportionately affect certain populations, placing them at greater
risk of experiencing trauma and poor mental health outcomes. Some
special populations are described below.
8.1. Veterans
An obvious at-risk population are soldiers involved in fighting on the front
lines. Studies of American veterans from the “Vietnam Conflict” con-
ducted between 1986 and 1988 estimated a prevalence of PTSD of 30.9%
for men and 26.9% for women. At the time of the study, 15.2% of males
and 8.1% of females were diagnosed with active PTSD. Of American Gulf
War veterans, PTSD was found at a prevalence of 12.1% in a population-
based sample of 11,441 veterans.14 An estimated overall prevalence of
PTSD in the “Gulf War” population was 10.1%.11 In the more recent
American wars with Iraq and Afghanistan, a 2008 study of veterans of
previously deployed “Operation Enduring Freedom” and “Operation Iraqi
Freedom” reported a prevalence of PTSD of 13.8%.29
8.2. Civilians
More frequently during the late 20th and early 21st centuries, civilian
populations have suffered a major impact of war. An estimated 191 mil-
lion people have died as a result of wars and conflicts in the 20th century,
with more than 60% of total war deaths occurring among civilians.23
Particularly troubling have been uses of “ethnic cleansing” and genocide
as weapons of war, targeting civilians and placing them at great risk of
terror, harm, and death. In the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, at least 800,000
civilians were systematically killed over the course of 100 days. In the
months that followed, other devastating consequences, including lack of
8.3. Women
The use of GBV as a weapon of war has also become more common and
has gained more attention in recent years. It had previously been consid-
ered an unfortunate co-occurrence during wartimes, but is now being rec-
ognized as a weapon of war. In 2008, the United Nations Security Council
passed a resolution naming sexual violence as a war crime, a crime against
humanity, a form of torture, and a constituent act of genocide.
Estimates of rapes of women during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda are
between 250,000 and 500,000. During the civil war in Sierra Leone, at
least 50,000 women were victims of gender-based sexual violence. During
the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1992 and 1995, an
estimated 10,000 and 60,000 women were raped.2 In the Congo, approxi-
mately 200,000 women and girls have been raped. Rape is used as a
method of destabilizing, terrorizing, and controlling civilian populations.
In all of these conflicts, perpetration of rape as a weapon of war has had
devastating effects on the social fabric of societies and the mental health
of women. It is used also as a method of humiliation of women as well as
their families. The consequences, including unwanted pregnancies and
children, diseases, and social stigmatization and rejection, frequently
result in a near complete breakdown of the fabric of society.
8.4. Children
Children are very often victims of war. They may be injured or killed, or
enter into one of the high-risk conditions listed above. However, there are
two other specific conditions that children may find themselves in. The
11. SELF-ASSESSMENT
11.1. Aside from soldiers, which populations are at risk
for trauma related mental health problems
in the context of war/conflict?
All people exposed to extremes of violence and traumatic experience in war
settings are at high risk of developing trauma-related mental health problems.
Civilians are at high risk in conflict settings. Women and children exposed to
violence are at very high risk. In addition, victims of torture and GBV are at
very high risk of developing mental health symptoms or full syndromes.
Rouge genocide in the late 1970s prior to living in a Thai refugee camp
for five years. She sustained multiple losses including watching the execu-
tion of family members and her own multiple violations including sexual
assault, forced labor, and severe beatings. Since that time, she has devel-
oped intrusive memories of the “Killing Fields” that she thinks about
much of the time. She also relives traumatic events in nightmares almost
every night. She avoids situations or conversations that might remind her
of Cambodia or Thailand and will not listen to the Khmer news reporting
on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. She is easily startled and has episodes
consistent with the Western notion of “panic attack” almost every time she
goes into a public place.
Ms Chhim’s diagnosis can likely be thought about as a chronic form of
PTSD. Treatment for her may be multifactorial and include (among other
things) social support, psychotropic medication, and culturally sensitive
forms of counseling or behavioral therapy. These treatment approaches
may reduce her suffering and improve her quality of life, but they are
unlikely to eliminate symptoms completely.
REFERENCES
1. Ahmad A, Sofi MA, Sundelin-Wahlsten V, et al. (2000) Posttraumatic stress
disorder in children after the military operation Anfal in Iraqi Kurdistan. Eur
J Child Adolesc Psychiatry 9: 235–243.
2. Ashford M, Huet-Vaughn Y. (1997) The impact of war on women. In: Levy
B, Sidel V (eds.), War and Public Health, pp. 186–196, Oxford University
Press, Oxford.
3. Baingana F, Fannon I, Thomas R. (2005) Mental Health and Conflicts —
Conceptual Frame-Work and Approaches, World Bank, Washington, DC.
4. Bleich A, Gelkopf M, Solomon Z. (2003) Exposure to terrorism, stress
related mental health symptoms, and coping behaviours among a nationally
representative sample in Israel. JAMA 290: 612–620.
5. Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD. (2000) Meta-analysis of risk factors
for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J Consult Clin
Psychol 68(5): 748–766.
6. Carballo M, Smakjkic A, Zeric D, Dzidowska M, Gebre-Medhin J, Halem
JV. (2004) Mental health and coping in a war situation: The case of Bosnia
and Herzegovina. J Biosoc Sci 36: 463–477.
20. Pham PN, Weinstein HM, Longman T. (2004) Trauma and PTSD symptoms
in Rwanda: Implications for attitudes toward justice and reconciliation.
JAMA 292: 602–612.
21. Qouta S. (2003) Trauma, Violence and Mental Health: The Palestinian
Experience. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Doctoral Dissertation.
22. Rowland-Klein D, Dunlop R. (1998) The transmission of trauma across
generations: Identification with parental trauma in children of Holocaust
survivors. Aust NZ J Psychiat 32(3): 358–369.
23. Rummel R. (1994) Death by Government: Genocide and Mass Murder Since
1900, Transaction Publications, New Brunswick, NJ and London.
24. Sartor C, McCutcheon V, et al. (2010) Posttraumatic stress disorder and
alcohol dependence in young women. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 71(6): 810–818.
25. Scholte W, Olff M, Ventevogel P, et al. (2004) Mental health symptoms
following war and repression in Eastern Afghanistan. JAMA 292, 585–593.
26. Sher L. (2004) Recognizing post-traumatic stress disorder. QJM- Mon J
Assoc Phys 97(1): 1–5. Available at: http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/
97/1/1.2.short
27. Somasundaram D, Jamunanatha C. (2002) Psychosocial consequences of
war: Northern Sri Lankan experience. In: de Jong JTVM (ed.), Trauma, War
and Violence: Public Mental Health in Socio-cultural Context, pp. 205–258,
Plenum Press, NY.
28. Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, Marnane C, Bryant RA, van Ommeren M. (2009)
Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental
health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displace-
ment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 302(5): 537–549.
29. Tanielian T, Jaycox LE. (2008) Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and
Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery,
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
30. UNHCR. (2010) 2009 Global Trends Refugees, Asylum-seekers, Returnees,
Internally Displaced and Stateless Persons. United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees.
31. UNICEF. (2004) From perception to reality — A study of child protection in
Somalia, Nairobi.
32. Usta J, Farver Jo Ann M, Zein L. (2008) Women, war, and violence:
Surviving the experience. J Women’s Health 17(5): 793–804.
33. World Health Organization. (2001) Mental Health: New Understanding, New
Hope, WHO World Health Report 2001, World Health Organization, Geneva.
Chapter 35
Stigma
Travis Fisher
1. INTRODUCTION
Stigma — the word itself has a hard, harsh sound. Given the destruction
and pain that can be wrought upon those afflicted with it, there is a certain
aptness in that. The origins of the word date back to ancient Greece, when
criminals and other social undesirables would be tattooed, cut, or other-
wise given a permanent mark representing their offence. In the modern
era, the definition has broadened, though some debate exists as to the
extent of these new boundaries.5 This chapter will discuss that broadened
definition, the historical consequences of mental health stigma, various
theories which attempt to explain why it develops, and close with broad
categories of “treatment” for it.
Throughout this chapter, there will be instances where families or
individuals living with the symptoms or the diagnosis of mental illness
are mentioned. The term “patient” will be used when describing those
individuals relationship to the mental health system, rather than
“client,” “consumer,” or “service user.” We prefer the term “patient” for
its invocation of the great moral responsibility owed to those seeking
treatment, as it brings to mind traditions of care as ancient as
Hippocrates and as modern as the unique laws governing doctor–patient
relationships.
886
Stigma 887
2. DEFINITION
Most modern discussions of the stigma of mental illness begin with
Goffman’s8 classic definition of stigma: “the view that an attribute such as
having a mental illness is deeply discrediting and justifies a hostile
response from society.” His definition was intended for all categories of
disability, but has special resonance for mental illness. Since then, various
philosophical camps have argued that stigma is simply another term for
prejudice based on negative stereotypes, that it is the negative effect of the
label itself, or that it is when one aspect of a person becomes the explana-
tion for all they do.5 This chapter will follow the leads of Corrigan7 and
Hinshaw9 who view stigma as the stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimina-
tion that give rise to negative reactions from the so-called “normal” major-
ity. This is a cognitive and social model that will assist us in maintaining
a practical focus on not just how we academically define stigma but what
it does — impairs the life of those affected by it.
2.1. Stereotype
Stereotypes are the cognitive component of stigma. They are negative ver-
sions of the structures or “schemas” that all individuals use to categorize
information. The presence of these schemas, even the presence of negative
ones, does not in and of itself constitute stigma. An individual may be able
to endorse knowledge of the stereotype about mental illness indicating
dangerousness, incompetence, and character weakness without agreeing
with them.7 However, they may support the development of prejudice and
discrimination.
2.2. Prejudice
Prejudice is the affective component of stigma. The difference from the
previous category is that those stereotypes have now become unreasoning,
unjustifiable, and prejudged.9 Knowledge of those cognitive schemas has
now hardened into belief, with no or little allowance for exceptions to be
made. Anger, fear, or other negative emotions are generated as a result,
and may support behavioral reactions.
888 T. Fisher
2.3. Discrimination
Behavioral reactions are the discrimination of stigma, built upon justifica-
tions provided by prejudice and stereotypes. This category certainly
includes violence by members of the public toward those perceived as
mentally ill, but denying opportunities and other subtle forms of stigma
can be targeted at the stigmatized individual or their family.
It should be noted that stigma does not always come only from mem-
bers of the public; the receiver of public stigma can perceive truth and
validity in the stigma, a process often called “self-stigma” (Table 1),
adapted from Corrigan.7 While self-stigma is defined in a very similar way
as public stigma, the “symptoms” are not always the same, and require
different interventions.
Stigma 889
will be stripped of the basic right of free movement. In the case of mentally
ill persons in westernized nations, free movement may be restricted though
a bureaucratic civil commitment process that involves the courts, locked
hospital wards, and involuntary medication. Patients lose the ability to
choose whom they congregate with, and what and when they eat; they may
spend periods of time under direct physical restraint. In resource-poor
regions like sub-Saharan Africa, rural India, or rural China, there may be
fewer options for treatment. Simple chains may be used to restrain indi-
viduals for prolonged periods, especially if the individual is perceived to
be otherwise uncontrollable. This may occur at home, in healing temples,
or in hospitals. The World Health Organization (WHO) has targeted this
practice for elimination, noting that if chained to a bed or wall, individuals
lose the ability to flee danger and may be denied basic sanitation.18
As the world was reminded in 2001, this danger is more than mere
hyperbole. The small town of Erwadi, in the Tamil Nadu state of India, is
home to a Muslim shrine that many believe cures mental illness. On
6 August 2001, a fire swept through one of the town’s 16 asylums, killing
28 mentally ill patients who were chained to stone pillars. The patients
had no opportunity to escape; the fire spread too quickly for anyone to free
them from their shackles. Much like the justification for physical restraint
in psychiatric hospitals in the West, the justification for chaining patients
in shrines hinges on the danger that these men and woman pose to them-
selves or others if freed. The individual details of the confinement vary but
the loss of free movement is the same. Also similar is that mentally ill
people may face stigma coming from their “treatment providers.”
It is initially tempting to overlook the potential for stigma inside this
process. After all, doesn’t society have a right to “defend itself” from the
dangers of unpredictable, violent mentally ill patients? If treatment pro-
viders share the stereotype that all mentally ill patients are violent, they
can also become fearful for their safety. They may restrain patients for
potential violence who do not actually represent any threat, “just to be
safe.” In regions and countries where long-term restraint is an option, such
thinking may lead to not recognizing improvement or recovery soon
enough to remove the chains from a now passive individual. A stereotype,
prejudice, and discriminatory action have then come together to create
stigma.
890 T. Fisher
3.2.1. Housing
Independent housing is desired by many mental health patients for a vari-
ety of reasons: as a sign of recovery, as an indication of increased wealth
and status, or simply out of a desire for independence, privacy, and the
ability to raise a family. Multiple studies have demonstrated landlords’
decreased willingness to rent to individuals with a diagnosis of mental
illness.7 Landlords wield great power in their role as “gatekeepers,” and
any prejudice they demonstrate can be disproportionately damaging to
mentally ill persons seeking housing. Many communities in Western
nations have proven unwillingness to allow low-cost housing for the men-
tally ill to be built in “their” neighborhoods.
In regions with emphasis in an extended rather than a nuclear family
structure, there is less pressure for independent housing for mentally ill
people. Traditional Indian, Chinese, and Japanese cultures are such exam-
ples. Many individuals with symptoms of mental illness utilize the family
unit as their primary source of treatment and support.13 However, they do
not necessarily avoid stigma. Ng13 points out that this same familial orienta-
tion can lead to strong intra-family shame and guilt, culminating in a desire
to conceal the mentally ill family member as a “disgrace.” There may be
Stigma 891
3.2.2. Employment
The difficulties faced by mentally ill patients seeking employment extend
beyond prejudice and discrimination by employers; they may encounter
such attitudes in their co-workers as well. This may lead to mentally ill
workers not only overtly keeping “the secret” of their diagnosis or symp-
toms from their employer, but also withdrawing from workplace socializa-
tion or relationships out of fear that their secret may be discovered.7 Kay
Redfield Jamison writes in her book “An Unquiet Mind” that even as a
mental health academic, she herself encountered stigma regarding her
bipolar disorder — one of her colleagues expressed disappointment with
her after discovering her history of illness and a suicide attempt.
Wahl’s16 work with patients demonstrated that, at some point, 72% had
not mentioned their illness on an application, 53% felt they had lost a job
by disclosing their illness, and only 33% felt that co-workers were at least
“often” understanding of their status as patients. Similar results have been
found in eastern cultures as well; more than 50% of surveyed patients in
China and Singapore also indicated that they concealed their diagnosis
from their co-workers.19
Some authors have questioned whether the level of industrialization of
a region influences psychiatric prognosis, especially in the case of schizo-
phrenia. The “industrialization hypothesis” posits that family support and
roles in manual labor in developing regions allow individuals to avoid the
intolerance, isolation, and marginalization faced by their counterparts in
the industrialized world.17 Taking India as an example, some studies have
demonstrated less stigma in rural areas than urban ones, but other studies
are mixed, or show the reverse.10
892 T. Fisher
3.2.4. Marriage
Along with the structural stigma mentioned above, marriage and other
romantic relationships can uncover powerful stigma from individuals who
are asked to accept mental illness “into the family.” Many patients can tell
of the anxiety involved in considering whether and when to discuss a
diagnosis or symptoms with a potential partner. There may be concerns
about passing “defective” genes onto any children, or about future epi-
sodes of the illness being disruptive to the marriage or family. In cultures
where marriage has additional social status implications, a person with a
history of mental illness to be considered a “poor match.” This discrimina-
tion has been described in several Asian cultures,13 but is by no means
exclusive to them. When assessing stigma, one of the first questions asked
Stigma 893
894 T. Fisher
4. EXPLANATORY MODELS
Why does stigma exist? Is inflicting pain and marginalizing others simply
woven into our design, or is stigma a by-product of some otherwise adap-
tive or positive process? An understanding of the origins of the stigma
against the mentally ill may help in efforts to confront it.
Sociologists and psychologists have developed multiple theories to explain
the existence and “purpose” of stigma. At times, such models can seem very
esoteric or clinically irrelevant, but they share the common goal of trying to
better understand the phenomenon in order to change it. We will explore
several models here, though what follows is by no means an exhaustive list.
Stigma 895
4.4. Categorization
Categorization is a theory that characterizes prejudice and stereotypes as
extensions of the cognitive “schemas” that humans have developed to
organize our worlds. The physical world is complicated enough that we
need to “lump” objects and events into categories so that we can accu-
rately and quickly respond appropriately to our environment.9 These sche-
mas can be benign and even helpful, for instance, seeing someone behind
the counter of a store instantly brings to mind general assumptions about
896 T. Fisher
how much he will know about the products within it, and preparation for
interacting with them in a certain way to make purchases. This nearly
automatic process helps reduces our mental “work load” by using past
experience to inform future behavior. In this view, prejudice and discrimi-
nation can develop either when individual differences are ignored in order
to “fit” someone into a pre-existing category, or when the category itself
is invalid.
5. INTERVENTIONS
What can we do about stigma? As current or future doctors, is there a
special role for us in challenging and quashing stigma, or is it left to
Stigma 897
patients and society to work it out among themselves? The latter choice
seems ridiculous, but in practice it is exactly how many psychiatrists have
approached the issue over the years. In the midst of a busy practice and
life, it is often very easy to want that time for other things, or fool our-
selves into thinking that we do “more good” by treating patients and leav-
ing everything else for someone else to do. Norman Sartorius,14 former
president of the World Psychiatric Association and anti-stigma advocate,
has posed the following broad categories.
898 T. Fisher
6. CONCLUSIONS
This introduction to the current study and understanding of stigma has
introduced the reader to the complexities underlying this pervasive phe-
nomenon. Though there may be debate about the exact definition of
stigma, or the etiological theory that best explains it, there is agreement
on the fact that stigma impedes our patients in multiple realms of their
lives. Seek out and remember your patients’ stories, and join your patients
as they work to gain from society the simplest of dignities — equality.
7. SELF-ASSESSMENT
7.1. The just world hypothesis argues that:
(A) Pairing of an aversive reaction with mental illness leads to fear of it.
(B) Being labeled as mentally ill leads patients to behave in ways that fit
society’s negative stereotypes.
(C) Fear of one’s own vulnerability leads to blaming the patient for part
or all of their difficulties.
(D) Stigma results when the mind groups an individual into a broad cat-
egory based on faulty information or ignoring evidence challenging
the fit.
Answer: C
Stigma 899
8. CASE STUDIES
8.1. Mr A
I remember going into the hospital the first time. I wasn’t ready for the
police to show up after I called the crisis line to tell someone about my
hallucinations. They put me in the back of a squad car and drove me to the
hospital. I was so scared when we finally got there that the first thing I did
was try to run. But they caught me right away.
I was roughly lifted up and tied down. It was terrifying, painful torture.
I didn’t know when it was going to stop. No one was talking to me, as if
they didn’t even see me, only the threat I represented to them. With the
straps came the shot. No one told me what it was, or asked me about it.
Instead they told me I was “getting medicine” as I felt my pants pulled
down and the needle pierce my skin.
Not only were the restraints biting into my limbs, but now fire was
coursing through my veins. In my paranoid mind, I was certain that I had
just been poisoned. No one was left in the room to comfort me as I cried,
only an unnamed staff member outside the door. The newspaper in her
hands never even twitched.
8.2. Ms B
I guess the trouble really started in the hospital. I had been attending the
university, and found out that I would no longer be welcome to return
because of my “mental disorder.” They thoughtfully sent all my belong-
ings to my family’s home. I thought about trying to stay in the city, but no
one seemed very interested in renting to me. Even if I didn’t tell them
900 T. Fisher
where I was, they knew as soon as they returned my phone calls and a
nurse picked up. The staff kept “encouraging” me to return home, where
it would be less stressful, and my family could care for me.
At home it is as if I died instead of got sick. Mother goes to the market
alone, never asking if I want to come. One night at dinner I said one sentence
about possibly going back to school — one sentence! — and I thought my
brother would have a stroke. He spent a half-hour talking about how bad it
would be for him if my “next episode” was more public than this one. Part
of me thinks it was pointless to get better, if this is all there is.
8.3. Mrs C
My lawyer warned me, but I still felt violated. My husband’s lawyer
started talking about my hospitalization, and it all fell apart. I was “crazy,”
and therefore not fit to raise the children. His history of drugs didn’t mat-
ter, or all the hours he worked now. He had even been arrested once! I take
my medicine, I pray, and I’ve been doing great, but it didn’t matter.
I barely see them [the kids] now. I can’t take it. All I ever was [sic] was
a mother; what am I now?
8.4. Mr F
I told D about E this morning. She didn’t even know I had a brother. I
didn’t want to lie to her any longer, but I was so nervous about how she
was going to react. We’re pretty westernized now (and good thing too, or
I’d really never get matched up), but her family is still really traditional.
She seemed to take it pretty well, at least at first.
She just called me a minute ago, saying she couldn’t see me anymore.
I could still hear people talking about me, and speculating about E, in the
background. She had a bunch of other reasons, but I knew. It’s not my
fault! Why does he keep getting pulled into my life — we never had any-
thing to do with each other, even when he lived here! Why wasn’t he just
born dead instead of defective?
8.5. Mr G
I don’t think a single person remembered my name today. The other nuts,
I guess, but hey, we don’t count, right? The doc didn’t remember my name
Stigma 901
and I overheard the nurses call me “the tall schizo.” Nice, huh? You can
confront them, but it doesn’t do any good: you are just “difficult,” couldn’t
possibly have a valid point.
And the social worker? Refuses to help me find my own place. She
figures that I couldn’t handle it, or something. Keeps pushing and pushing
me to let someone else take care of my money, like I should be a kid wait-
ing for an allowance. I got pissed, and let her know. Now “anger manage-
ment” is part of my treatment plan, and if I don’t “work on it” they cut my
OWPs (off ward privileges).
Oh, I almost forgot the best part — when the doc was talking to his med
students and not me, he drops that “these patients have very poor out-
comes.” How about focusing on THIS patient?
8.6. Mrs H
So this guy came into my store the other day, one of those crazy guys from
the hospital up the road, you know? He was dressed nice, didn’t act weird,
but he was staying out at The Inn — only nuts live there. He wanted to
apply for the assistant manager’s job. I wanted to say “no way,” but I had
to take his application just like anybody else. The last time we hired some-
one like that they kept showing up late, missing shifts, could not follow
directions, violated the dress code; probably the worst employee I ever
had. I never hired another one after that experience.
But I am not the only one. When I first moved the shop here all the
other businesses told me their horror stories; it was good to learn from
them, not have to make the same mistakes. Sure enough, over the next
week he got all pushy, calling a couple of times “inquiring about the job;”
made me glad we got someone else.
REFERENCES
1. Adewuya A, Oguntade A. (2007) Doctors’ attitude towards people with men-
tal illness in Western Nigeria. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42(11):
931–936.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2001) Nurse battles to erase Korea’s
entrenched stigma problem. Psychiatric News 36(17): 11–32.
902 T. Fisher
Stigma 903
19. Yang LH. (2007) Application of mental illness stigma theory to Chinese
societies: Synthesis and new directions. Singapore Med J 48(11): 977–985.
20. Yeni A. (2010). All Africa Global Media Website. Available at: http://
allafrica.com/stories/201007130428.html. Accessed on 8 May 2010.
Chapter 36
Joseph B. Layde
1. INTRODUCTION
The relationship between psychiatry and the law varies tremendously
from country to country and even from jurisdiction to jurisdiction in
federal systems like the United States, Canada, and India. Additionally,
nations or parts of nations have judicial systems with varying histories —
systems based on English common law, Roman civil law, and Islamic
Sharia being a few noteworthy examples (Table 1). Different legal systems
handle the practice of psychiatry and the application of psychiatric opin-
ion to legal issues in various ways, but certain core areas of interaction of
psychiatry and the law are universally important, although the details
of that interaction may be very different in different jurisdictions. This
chapter examines several of those core areas of interaction and briefly
discusses some of the variation found in the relationship of psychiatry and
law around the world.
904
906 J. B. Layde
908 J. B. Layde
learn the legal standard that possible testimony in a criminal case would
address.
5. PSYCHIATRIC MALPRACTICE
As is the case in all fields of medicine, legal recourse is available to
patients who are injured by psychiatrists practicing substandard care. In
some societies, medical (including psychiatric) malpractice suits are quite
rare, while in others (such as the United States), they occur frequently.
Patients who have had a bad outcome due to the improper diagnosis
and treatment of their psychiatric disorder may sue because they received
the wrong medication; family members of a patient who committed sui-
cide while a psychiatric inpatient may sue the hospital and the patient’s
psychiatrist for failing to keep the patient safe. Forensic psychiatrists
may be involved in evaluating whether or not the psychiatrist’s practice
has met the appropriate standard of medical care. Malpractice insurance
910 J. B. Layde
912 J. B. Layde
7. KEY POINTS
• Differing legal systems around the world handle the regulation of
psychiatric practice substantially differently.
• Psychiatrists must be familiar with the laws in their own jurisdictions
regarding psychiatric practice.
• Psychiatric testimony is used in many jurisdictions in handling issues
in criminal law, including criminal responsibility.
• Psychiatric evaluations may be important in dealing with issues in
civil law, including questions of psychological injuries.
• The subject of a psychiatric legal evaluation must be informed of the
purpose of the evaluation.
• Psychiatric involvement in torture is always unethical.
8. SELF-ASSESSMENT
8.1. A psychiatrist is asked by a patient, a 28-year-old man
who suffers from dysthymia, to fill out a form requesting
medical disability insurance payments for his illness.
The patient says, “You can exaggerate my symptoms
a little bit, just for my sake.” Which of the following
is the most appropriate response by the psychiatrist?
(A) “I cannot say anything useful about your clinical condition.”
(B) “We will just make sure the disability insurance company gives you
some money.”
(C) “I can tell them how you are doing — no more and no less.”
(D) “You deserve whatever you can get.”
(E) “Your clinical condition is not the business of the insurance
company.”
Answer: C3
Answer: B6
9. CASE STUDY
A psychiatrist practicing in California is contacted by a defense attorney
with the request that she examine a 25-year-old man who suffered third-
degree burns on his leg in a collision between the motorcycle he was rid-
ing and a truck. The young man complains of nightmares and flashbacks
related to the crash and is suing for damages related to both the burn injury
and psychological injuries. The defense attorney represents the driver of
the truck, who was at fault in the collision.
The psychiatrist agrees to see the injured man in her office for an “inde-
pendent medical evaluation.” She explains to the injured man that she is
not his treating psychiatrist but, rather, has been retained by the truck
driver’s lawyer to conduct the examination. The young man says that
he understands the circumstances of the evaluation and is willing to
continue.
In the course of examining the injured young man, the psychiatrist
finds that he in fact suffers from moderately severe posttraumatic stress
disorder as a result of the collision. She informs the lawyer who hired her
of her opinion. Although the defense lawyer is unhappy with the psychia-
trist’s findings, she clearly explains to him the medical reasons for her
conclusions. He recognizes that the validity of the injured man’s claim
would be evident if the case were to go forward to trial. Partly on the basis
of the psychiatrist’s evaluation, the defense attorney recommends to the
truck driver that he offer a generous settlement to the motorcycle rider for
both his burn injuries and for his resultant psychological injuries.
914 J. B. Layde
REFERENCES
1. Abdalla-Filho E, Bertolote JM. (2006) Forensic psychiatric systems of the
world. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 28(Supl II): S56–S61.
2. AAPL — American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. (2005) Ethics
Guidelines for the Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, adopted May 2005.
Available at: http://www.aapl.org/ethics.htm. Accessed on 6 November 2010.
3. Appelbaum PS. (1997) A theory of ethics for forensic psychiatry. J Am Acad
Psychiatry Law 25(3): 233–247.
4. Feldman EA. (2009) Why patients sue: The Japanese experience. J Law Med
Ethics 37(4): 792–799.
5. Neeleman J, Van Os J. (1996) Ethical issues in European psychiatry. Eur
Psychiatry 11: 1–6.
6. Vesti P, Lavik NJ. (1991) Torture and the medical profession: A review.
J Med Ethics 17: 4–8.
7. WPA — World Psychiatric Association. (1996) Madrid Declaration on Ethical
Standards for Psychiatric Practice, Approved 25 August 1996. Available at:
http://www.wpanet.org/detail.php?section_id=5&content_id=48.
Accessed on 6 November 2010.
8. Young-Anawaty A. (1977) International human rights norms and Soviet
abuse of psychiatry. Case West Reserve J Int Law 10(3): 785–816.
Index
915
916 Index
Index 917
918 Index
Declaration of Hawaii 770, 910, 911 differential diagnosis 554, 556, 563
Declaration of Madrid 770 diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) 670
deep brain stimulation 212, 221, 224 disability-adjusted life year (DALY)
deinstitutionalization 846, 849, 850, 3
855, 857, 858 discrimination 727, 728, 798,
delirium 291–295, 303–306, 804–806, 887, 888, 891, 892, 894,
312–314, 573, 575, 589, 591, 593, 896, 897, 899
594, 598, 601, 732, 733, 735, 738, disease 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 39–41, 45,
739, 740, 742 50, 51, 52
delusions 186–188, 196, 811, 812 disrupted in schizophrenia 67, 70
dementia 291, 292, 295–300, dissociation 337, 338, 342, 345–348
303–307, 310, 311–315, 488, 491, dissociative amnesia 328
493, 499, 506, 508, 514, 515, 517, dissociative disorder 328, 329, 337,
729, 732, 733, 738, 739 339–341, 343, 345, 347
dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) dissociative fugue 328
311 dissociative identity disorder 337,
demoralization 735 340, 343
dependence 260, 261, 264, 265, dissociative stupor 328
267–271, 273–276, 279, 280, 282, disturbed shen (神) with phlegm 829
283, 286, 287 dopamine 185, 186, 192
dependent personality disorder 468, dopamine 2 receptor gene (DRD2)
470 758
depersonalization 338–340 dopamine 3 receptor gene (DRD3)
depression 488, 490–492, 495–497, 759
505, 576, 580, 581–583, 585, 588, dopamine 4 receptor gene (DRD4)
594, 596, 598, 599, 601, 602, 726, 759
732, 733, 735, 738, 741–743 dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3)
Determinants of the Outcome 761
of Severe Mental Disorders driving 484, 488, 489, 502, 506
(DOSMeD) 797 dual roles 784, 785
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of dyspareunia 414, 421, 423, 428
Mental Disorders (DSM) 31, 42 dyssomnia 355, 357, 358, 366
diagnostic classification 10, 11 dysthymia 204, 219, 220, 222
diagnostic criteria 28, 38, 48, 50, 51
diagnostic reliability 38, 52 early childhood trauma 725, 734,
diagnostic validity 38, 39, 52 738, 743
dialectical behavior therapy 393, 403 early-career psychiatrists 633
didactics 657–659, 661, 664 early-onset schizophrenia 173
Index 919
eating disorders 142, 143, 170, 172, factitious disorder by proxy 331
177 family 492, 494, 496, 497, 499,
ECFMG 644, 645 500
education 12–16, 80, 96, 642, 644, fellowships 642, 657, 665, 666
645, 650–652, 657, 658, 661, 666 female sexual arousal disorder 414,
Eight Ds 209 421, 424
elder abuse 494, 495 fidelity 772–774, 790
electrocardiography 353 fight 338, 341–343
electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) formulation 554, 556, 563, 564, 568
212, 906 frontotemporal degeneration (FTD)
electroencephalography 353 310
electromyography 353 fugue 339, 340, 341, 344
electrooculography 353 fusion 347, 350
elimination disorders: enuresis and
encopresis 168 Ganser’s Syndrome 331
emic and etic 796, 799 gender identity disorder 410–413,
empathic validation 80 415, 416, 435, 436, 437, 439
employment 890, 891 gene variations 746
endophenotypes 60 gene–environment interaction (GxE)
epistasis 753 680
ERAS 644–647 generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)
erectile disorder 421 252
error 104, 106, 107, 118 genetic determinants of Alzheimer’s
Erwadi 889 disease 299
ethical skills 776, 777, 778 genetics 59
ethics 18, 19, 555, 568, 768–770, genocide 865, 872, 875, 877, 878,
772–774, 776–778, 781, 785, 787, 881, 883
788, 789 genome wide association studies 59,
ethnic minorities 805, 808, 811 62
ethnicity global assessment of functioning
ethnocultural group 800, 803, (GAF) rating scale 47
808, 816 glutamatergic 192
evaluation of sexual functioning 416
execution 911 Haemophilus influenzae 680
explanatory model of illness 807, 815 hallucinations 186–188
expressed emotion 798, 818 haplotype 751
harm reduction 734, 853, 854, 856,
factitious disorder 317, 322, 326, 327, 858, 859
329, 330, 331, 333, 586–589, 599 heritability 60
920 Index
Index 921
922 Index
Index 923
924 Index