Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
International University
1
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ................................................................................................... 3
1. Introduce Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) .................................... 3
2. Introduce effect of salinity on rice plant in Vietnam ..................................... 4
II. Contents ......................................................................................................... 6
1. Nomal phenotype of rice.............................................................................. 6
1.1. Morphological characteristics of rice plant ....................................................... 6
1.2. Genome characteristics of rice plant ................................................................. 9
2. Genome characteristics of halophytes rice plants........................................... 10
2.1. Roles of Polyamines in Salinity Tolerance ....................................................... 12
2.2. Transcriptional Regulation and Gene Expression of Salinity Tolerance......... 12
2.3. Hormone Regulation of Salinity Tolerance ...................................................... 13
3. Morphological characteristics of halophytes rice plants ................................. 13
3.1. Shoot ................................................................................................................. 14
3.2. Leaf ................................................................................................................... 15
3.3. Root ................................................................................................................... 16
III. Summary ............................................................................................................... 18
Reference ........................................................................................................................ 19
2
I. Introduction
1. Introduce Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
- Plants with favourable characteristics have been produced for thousands of
years by conventional breeding methods. Desirable traits are selected, combined and
propagated by repeated sexual crossings over numerous generations. This is a long
process, taking up to 15 years to produce new varieties.1 Genetic engineering not only
allows this process to be dramatically accelerated in a highly targeted manner by
introducing a small number of genes, it can also overcome the barrier of sexual
incompatibility between plant species and vastly increase the size of the available
gene pool
- Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) refer to plants and animals with an
altered genetic make-up that's been "edited" in the laboratory in order to incorporate
genes from another organism.
- Transgenic (GM) plants are those that have been genetically modified using
recombinant DNA technology. This may be to express a gene that is not native to the
plant or to modify endogenous genes. The protein encoded by the gene will confer a
particular trait or characteristic to that plant. The technology can be utilized in a
number of ways, for example to engineer resistance to abiotic stresses, such as
drought, extreme temperature or salinity, and biotic stresses, such as insects and
pathogens, that would normally prove detrimental to plant growth or survival. Some
benefits of genetic engineering in agriculture are increased crop yields, reduced costs
for food or drug production, reduced need for pesticides, enhanced nutrient
composition and food quality, resistance to pests and disease, greater food security,
and medical benefits to the world's growing population. Advances have also been
made in developing crops that mature faster and tolerate aluminum, boron, salt,
drought, frost, and other environmental stressors, allowing plants to grow in conditions
where they might not otherwise flourish New-generation GM crops are now also being
developed for the production of recombinant medicines and industrial products, such
as monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, plastics and biofuels.
- Examples:
Figure
1: GM
tomato
3
Figure 2: GM corn
4
Figure 3: Salinity modeling for the Mekong delta in Vietnam
- Salinity intrusion is associated with low water discharge from upstream of the
Mekong River. This is caused by the below average rainfall in the Mekong basin due
to the El Niño. With insufficient upstream water flow to push back seawater, salinity
intrusion increased in concentration and duration this year. It was also aggravated by
the drought and high temperature in the region
- Normally, the salinity level in the Mekong river system will start to rise by the
end of December, reach its peak in March or April and decline afterwards. However
this year, salinity increase peaked two months earlier, intruded further inland and
remained longer during the dry season.
- In February 2016, the salinity intrusion reached beyond the dykes for the first
time. Despite warnings, both local officials and farmers underestimated the risks. This
is because the profit to be obtained encouraged farmers to keep planting even in high
risk areas with increased threats of drought and salinity-related problems.
- Vast tracks of land planted with rice were affected by salinity intrusion and
drought at the reproductive stage. Yields were reduced by 50-100%, or total loss.
- Many of the farmers noted that they have seen a decrease in rice yield and in the
size of coconuts due to saline intrusion. Rice production is not possible during the
period of saltwater intrusion. Since saltwater has started to intrude earlier than before,
one consequence of saline intrusion is that many farmers have had to change their
rice crops from longterm rice to mid-term and short-term rice crops. By changing the
length of the rice growth the farmers are able to harvest before the saltwater period
starts. If saltwater intrudes earlier than expected, the risk of yield losses is high.
5
Figure 4: Causal diagram of serious damages of affected rice areas by salinity related problems in the
2011 dry season in Tra Vinh province (Nguyen Thanh Binh, 2015)
II. Contents
1. Nomal phenotype of rice
1.1. Morphological characteristics of rice plant
- Root system:
Rice is a monocarpic annual plant, growing to 1–1.8
m tall, occasionally more depending on the variety
and soil fertility. The plant has a fibrous root
system. Finely-branched adventitious roots arise
from the lower nodes of the stem (culm). The size
and length of the roots vary. Drained conditions are
best for good root development. Maximum root
development is reached at the peak of the tillering
stage, then begins to decrease, and toward the
fruiting stage, almost ceases.
6
- Stem:
- Leaves:
7
- Flowers:
The flower includes all the components
and parts enclosed by the lemma and
palea (hulls). Flowering starts the first day
the panicle emerges (usually 25-33 days
from inter-node elongation). Flowering
begins at the tip of the panicle and moves
progressively downward to the panicle
base. Depending on weather and variety,
flowering normally lasts from 6 to 10 days.
Flowering usually occurs from mid-
morning to shortly after noon. Rice is
normally self-pollinated, with pollen being
shed just before or at the time flowers
open. Flowering is delayed or stopped
during cloudy, rainy, or cool weather.
The period from first heading when 10 to
20 percent of the panicles have emerged
from the boot until maturity is usually 30 to
40 days.
- Panicle:
8
1.2. Genome characteristics of rice plant
- The rice genome was one of the few truly multinational plant genome projects,
one with flags planted in chromosomes (Eckardt 2000)—Japan, chromosomes 1, 6, 7
& 8; US, chromosomes 3 & 10; China, chromosome 4; France, chromosome 12;
Taiwan, chromosome 5; etc.—like early explorers claiming new territories. Arabidopsis
had been sequenced and published in 2000 (Arabidopsis Genome I 2000) and rice,
nearly four times the size, was next. These were heady days for plant genome
researchers, a discipline still in its infancy. Researchers jockeyed to be part of the
project and, like every good collaborative project, multitudinous meetings were held to
plan, to execute and, finally, to celebrate the rice genome project. These meetings
were often tense—deciding how chromosomes were distributed, discussing progress,
or lack thereof—and the omnipresent funding agency representatives hovered about
ensuring that their agencies funds were well spent, the most diminutive of whom could
elicit fear in the most seasoned genome researcher.
- Rice was one of the last clone-by-clone, Sanger-sequenced genomes. That is,
BAC/PAC clones were sequentially selected for sequencing, independently
assembled and then stitched together to form pseudo-chromosomes. One impact that
the rice genome had, even in the midst of sequencing, was the first completely
sequenced, complex eukaryotic centromere on chromosome 8 (Nagaki et al. 2004),
which are usually gaps in genome sequences as they are highly repetitive regions of
the genome. This was possible due to its diminutive size, ~64 kbp of satellite repeats,
even compared to even Arabidopsis centromeres. Thus, rice has been a model for
studies of centromere structure and function. This was possible due to cytogenetic
analysis of rice showing the diminutive centromere 8. Interestingly, if the US had
heeded cytogenetic descriptions they may not have chosen chromosome 9 as a
sequencing target as one arm is highly heterochromatic, full of repetitive DNA
sequences, which complicated physical mapping and sequencing of that chromosome
arm.
- Sequencing of the rice genome is a monumental task. To date, ∼3.5% of
the genome has been completed (15 of 430 Mb) and another 3 to 5% is in production.
Nonetheless, the data that have been released have already provided valuable
information on genome structure and organization (see, e.g., Mao et al., 2000), much
of which will apply to other cereal crops and to monocots in general. A major part of
the nuclear genomes of most plants, and indeed many eukaryotes, is composed of
repetitive DNA elements. Repetitive DNA is estimated to constitute at least 50% of the
rice genome and as much as 70% of the maize genome (Nagano et al., 1999).
Complete sequencing of the rice genome will provide valuable information on the
effect of repetitive elements on genome organization and evolution in plants. The
IRGSP also constitutes a proving ground for sequencing and finishing methods for
complex genomes, which will provide excellent resources for other eukaryotic genome
sequencing projects in the future.
9
Figure 5: A rapid identification of plant QTL by whole genome resequencing of DNAs from two
populations each composed of 20-50 individuals showing extreme opposite trait values for a
given phenotype in a segregating progeny.
10
- Rice plants generally tolerate salt by mainly two mechanisms, ion exclusion and
osmotic tolerance (Munns and Tester, 2008). These mechanisms can also be further
classified into ion exclusion, osmotic tolerance and tissue tolerance (Roy et al., 2014).
Ion exclusion mainly involves Na+ and Cl– transport processes in roots, which prevent
the excess accumulation of Na+ and Cl– in leaves. Ion exclusion includes retrieval of
Na+ from the xylem, and efflux of ions back to the soil. Osmotic tolerance is regulated
by long distance signals that reduce shoot growth and is triggered before shoot
Na+accumulation. Osmotic tolerance involves the plant's ability to tolerate the drought
aspect of salinity stress and to maintain leaf expansion and stomatal
conductance(Rajendran et al., 2009). Tissue tolerance involves sequestration of
Na+ in the vacuole, synthesis of compatible solutes and production of enzymes
catalyzing detoxification of reactive oxygen species. Behind picture gives the outline of
possible mechanisms and genes involved in the salt tolerance. Some of the important
class of genes are OsSOS1, OsNHX1 (Na+/H+ antiporters) (Kumar et al., 2013; Amin
et al., 2016), OsHKT2;1 (Na+/K+ symporter) (Mishra et al.,
2016), OsCAX1 (H+/Ca+antiporter) (Kumar et al., 2013), OsAKT1 (K+ inward- rectifying
channel) (Yang et al., 2014), OsKCO1 (K+ outward-rectifying channel) (Kumar et al.,
2013), OsTPC1 (Ca2+permeable channel) (Kurusu et al., 2012), OsCLC1 (Cl– channel)
(Diedhiou and Golldack, 2006) and OsNRT1;2 (nitrate transporter) (Wang et al.,
2012). The salt tolerance and avoidance mechanisms can be divided into following
categories.
Figure 6:
Rice salt
tolerance
mechanis
m-
overview
of
important
genes
involved
at root,
shoot and
leaf levels.
11
2.1. Roles of Polyamines in Salinity Tolerance
12
abiotic stress responses involve DREB1/CBF, DREB2, and AREB/ABF. Transcriptions
factors such as OsNAC5 and ZFP179 show an upregulation under salinity stress,
which may regulate the synthesis and accumulation of proline, sugar, and LEA
proteins that in turn play an integral role in stress tolerance. In Arabidopsis, salt stress
results in the upregulation of AtWRKY8 which directly binds with the promoter
of RD29A, suggesting it to be as one of the target genes of AtWRKY8.
- In addition to protein coding genes, recently discovered microRNAs (miRNAs)
and endogenous small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have emerged as important players
in plant stress responses. Initial clues suggesting that small RNAs are involved in
plant stress responses stem from studies showing stress regulation of miRNAs and
endogenous siRNAs, as well as from target predictions for some miRNAs
13
Figure 8: On the left are listed the
cellular functions that would apply to all
cells within the plant. On the right are
the functions of specific tissues or
organs. Exclusion of at least 95%
(19/20) of salt in the soil solution is
needed as plants transpire 20 times
more water than they retain (Munns,
2005). Most of these functions are
explained in the text. Omitted for
space, and lack of recent advances, is
the limitation that Cl− can impose on
growth through its antagonistic
accumulation against the nitrogen form
NO3− (NO3− homeostasis)
(Henderson et al., 2014) and the
differential capacity and sensitivity of
different cell types and tissues to
accumulate Na+ and Cl−; for example,
NaCl accumulation within
photosynthetic cells incurs a larger cost
than accumulation in root cortical cells
(Conn & Gilliham, 2010). ROS, reactive
oxygen species; PGPR, plant growth-
promoting rhizobacteria.
3.1. Shoot
The salt tolerance of the different transgenics was compared using the salt-induced
(150 mM NaCl) growth inhibition assay of fast-growing young seedlings as a parameter
At the 10-d-old seedling stage, no significant morphological differences were observed
between the OsOTS1-OX and OsOTS-RNAi lines and control empty vector only under
unstressed conditions . However, the same lines grown in 150 m M NaCl showed
significant differences in sensitivity to salt in terms of seedling growth. In particular,
shoot growth of OsOTS-RNAi lines was significantly inhibited as measured by seedling
height (64%) and fresh weight (45%) compared to control, wild-type Nipponbare
transformed with empty vector (vector only). However, even though there was no clear
difference in shoot lengths between OsOTS1-OX and empty vector only transgenics,
14
OsOTS1-OX lines had significantly greater fresh weight compared to vector-only (16%)
or OsOTS-RNAi lines (56%). These results indicate that OsOTS1 has a critical role in
ameliorating rice seedling growth inhibition in high salinity. Significantly, overexpression
of OsOTS1 confers salt tolerance by attenuating the shoot growth inhibition during salt
stress in rice.
Figure 9: Phenotypic analysis of OsOTS-RNAi and OsOTS1-overexpressing lines under salt stress. Images of
10-d-old rice seedlings of various genotype in MS medium without salt (−NaCl; A) and MS medium with 150
mM NaCl (+NaCl; B). Shoot length (C) and shoot fresh weight (D) of 10-d-old plants grown in liquid MS
medium (with or without 150 mMNaCl). Each column represents an average of three individual biological
replicates with 20 seedlings in each experiment. Error bars indicate SD. P values for differences between
empty vector only and the transgenic lines: *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA test).
3.2. Leaf:
Another clear indicator of sensitivity in high salinity conditions in rice is the
inactivation of photosynthesis, and this is correlated with the ability to retain leaf
chlorophyll. We examined the chlorophyll content of floating leaf discs of the
transgenic lines exposed for 72 h to varying concentrations of NaCl. When leaf
discs were floated separately on different concentrations of NaCl for 72 h, the
damage caused by salt stress was evident from the degree of bleaching
15
observed in the leaf tissue. Chlorophyll content estimation was performed to
confirm the leaf disc assay results. Only OsOTS1-OX transgenic leaf segments
retained higher levels of chlorophyll (∼32–40%) compared to the vector-only
plants in salt. OsOTS-RNAi lines showed the greatest loss of chlorophyll content,
indicating rapid inhibition of photosynthesis.
3.3. Root:
- We wanted to determine whether this phenotype was also reflected in the roots
of OsOTS1 transgenics. Interestingly, under salt stress, both root length and fresh weight
were significantly higher in OsOTS1-OX lines compared to controls. However, OsOTS-RNAi
lines showed the greatest decrease in both root length (58%) and root fresh weight (58%),
indicating significant seedling root growth inhibition in salt. This is in contrast to what was
observed in shoots. These data suggested that OsOTS1 had a greater role in root growth
and development during high salinity.
- To obtain further insight into the function of OsOTS1 in adult rice plants, we grew the
different transgenics in soil for 45 d without salt treatment. The robustness of the effects
of OsOTS1-OX was confirmed by the increase in root length and fresh weight of these soil-
grown rice plants. These data suggest that deSUMOylation controlled by OsOTS1 may
preferentially target the factors that affect root development in rice.
16
Figure 11: OsOTS-RNAi roots
are highly sensitive to salt. Root
images of vector-only
control, OsOTS1-OX,
and OsOTS-RNAi seedlings
grown in liquid MS medium (in
absence of NaCl; A–C) or in
presence of 150 mM NaCl (D–
F). OsOTS-RNAi showed
dramatically reduced root
growth. G, Quantification of root
length and root fresh weight of
10-d-old plants in MS and MS
with 150 mM NaCl. Each column
represents an average of five
independent biological
replicates with 20 seeds in each
experiment. Error bars
indicate SD. P values for
differences between empty
vector only and the transgenic
lines: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001
(two-way ANOVA test).
17
III. Summary
- Improved seed production and distribution strategies will also need to be
considered in Vietnam. Private-public partnerships may play an important
role in this area. It is also unlikely that water-saving strategies such as AWD
will be adopted without concurrent policy changes that address the timely
release of water at the commune level.
- Salinity is one of the major factors which reduces crop production
worldwide. Plant responses to salinity are highly complex and involve a
plethora of genes. Through genomics, we have been able to identify and
characterize the genes involved in salinity stress response, map out
signaling pathways and ultimately utilize this information for improving the
salinity tolerance of existing crops. The use of new tools, such as gene
pyramiding, in genetic engineering and marker assisted breeding has
tremendously enhanced our ability to generate stress tolerant crops.
18
Reference
1. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2459290/CLIMAVIET_Technical
Brief_Drought%26Salinity%20%28September%2C%202014%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAll
owed=y
2. http://farmextensionmanager.com/English/Rice%20technology%20bank/General%20deta
ils/Botanical%20characteristics.htm
3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166913007192
4. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijg/2014/701596/
5. http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/170/4/2378
6. https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/3934/2/bergqvist_a_eitrem_holmgren_k_rylander_p_120227.p
df
7. https://www.biology-online.org/
8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1626/pps.10.159
9. Documents that receive from Assoc. Prof. Tran Van Minh
19