Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

Rubric for Assessment of the Argumentative Essay

4 3 2 1

INTRODUCTION Well-developed introduction Introduction creates interest and Introduction adequately explains Background details are a
Background/History engages the reader and creates contains background the background of the problem, random collection of
Define the Problem interest. Contains detailed information. Thesis clearly but may lack detail. Thesis information, unclear, or not
Thesis Statement background information and a clear states the problem. states the problem. related to the topic. Thesis
explanation of the problem. Thesis and/or problem is vague or
clearly states a significant and unclear.
compelling position.

MAIN POINTS Well developed main points directly Three or more main points are Three or more main points are Less than three main points,
Body Paragraphs related to the thesis. Supporting related to the thesis, but one present, and/or poor development of
Refutation examples are concrete and detailed. may lack details. Refutation ideas. Refutation missing or
Conclusion Refutation acknowledges opposing paragraph acknowledges the vague. Conclusion does not
view logically and clearly. opposing view and summarizes summarize main points.
Conclusion effectively wraps up and points. Conclusion effectively Commentary is not present.
goes beyond restating the thesis. summarizes topics.
Commentary is logical, and well Commentary is present.
thought out.

ORGANIZATION Logical progression of ideas with a Logical progression of ideas. Organization is clear. Transitions No discernable organization.
Structure clear structure that enhances the Transitions are present equally are present. Transitions are not present.
Transitions thesis. Transitions are mature and throughout essay.
graceful.

MECHANICS AND Writing is smooth, skillful, Writing is clear and sentences Writing is clear, but sentences Writing is confusing, hard to
coherent. Sentences are strong and have varied structure. Diction is may lack variety. Diction is follow. Contains fragments
STYLE expressive with varied structure. consistent. Punctuation, appropriate. A few errors in and/or run-on sentences.
Sentence flow, variety Diction is consistent and words well spelling, capitalization are punctuation, spelling, Inappropriate diction.
Diction chosen. Punctuation, spelling, generally correct, with few capitalization. (3-4) Distracting errors in
Spelling, punctuation, capitalization are correct. No errors. (1-2) punctuation, spelling,
capitalization errors.
capitalization.

SOURCES Sources are smoothly and logically Sources are integrated into the Source material is used. Lacks sources and/or sources
Use of sources integrated into the text, and clearly text, and accurately documented Sources are accurately are not accurately documented.
Format explain the ideas. Accurate format. using correct format. Sources documented, may contain a few Format is incorrect for all
Relevant/reliable Sources are relevant and reliable. are relevant and reliable. minor errors in format. sources.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen