Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
other words, the rich and the ignorant people. He opens the film by
comparing Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa with Damien Hirst’s For the
on his quote regarding the big shift in the art world, “What ties the Mona
Lisa to this glittery bobble is their role in a giant shift in the art world,
that shift is all about money”. Money basically has corrupted the art
admired from, not through any critical perspective, but for its price tag.
The auction houses are the new critiques and their job is to strike you
blind about what art is actually is, so that you can’t make your own
judgments. I admit that I am also the victim of this effect, since I often
see paintings and sculptures by their price tags and I can confirm that
Ghanaru Tranggono | 0754139
people are often to glorify any kinds of art that being categorized as
“expensive” since this would give them a value to be judged or for some
values, only for their profits. One part of the film that I really like is
Modern Art” into “The Funders of The Museum of Modern Art” since the
names listed on the wall of its museum only lists the rich people who
funded the museum. What has driven me mad is that the artists do not
get royalties of this business scandal and the rich are just simply using
their arts as a tool of investment for their profits. This also makes me
question the society, “What is art? Is art dead?”. If art is just a tool for
making money and profits for the rich and for mass consumption for
society to give everyone their Mona Lisa, then what is art today? One
portion that I really like from the film is how Hughes interview with
spiritual and necessary to the human heart, and the other that sees art
clearly outgunned.