Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Where figures for production in 1939 are given, they refer to September 1939
onwards; that is, they only count wartime production.
Notes:
Figures include tank production and chassis production used for other variants (for example, Panzer III figures
include StuG III production, etc.).
Panzer III figures for 1942 and 1943 excludes 700 Panzer III N models converted from older variants.
Germany also produced 44,259 armored half-tracks and 3,607 armored cars during the war .
Panzer I
Panzer I Pre-war: 1,893 hulls had been produced. 1,867 were fitted with turrets, and
the rest used as command vehicles. These lightly armed and armoured tanks were
intended as training vehicles, but were used in combat as the war came sooner than
the military men had anticipated.
Panzer I Ausf. A
Panzer II
Panzer II Pre-war: 1,223.
Panzer II
1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 Total
Panzer II 15 9 223 302 77 7 - 633
Panzer IIF "Flamingo" - 90 42 23 - - - 155
Marder II - - - 511 212 - - 723
Wespe - - - - 514 144 - 658
Sturmpanzer II - - - 12 - - - 12
Total 15 99 265 848 803 151 - 2,181
Variants:
Panzer 38(t)
Panzer 38(t) Pre-war: 78.
Panzer 38(t)
Variants:
Marder 138 (Marder III) - 75 mm PaK 40 L/46 gun on Panzer 38(t) chassis (Sd.Kfz. 138)
Marder 139 (Marder III) - captured Soviet 76.2 mm gun on Panzer 38(t) chassis (Sd.Kfz. 139)
Grille - 150 mm heavy infantry gun on Panzer 38(t) chassis (figures include munition-carrying versions of the Grille)
(Sd.Kfz. 138/1)
Hetzer (Jagdpanzer 38(t)) - 75 mm PaK 39 L/48 gun on a widened Pz 38(t) chassis (Sd.Kfz. 138/2)
Panzer III
Panzer III Pre-war: 98.
Panzer III
Totals do not include any Panzer III N models as these were converted from 3 (J), 447 (L), 213 (M
) and 37 other Panzer III variants.
Variants:
Panzer IV
Panzer IV Pre-war: 211.
Panzer IV Ausf. D
Panzer IV Ausf J
Jagdpanzer IV/48
Variants:
Panzer IV A-F1 - Panzer IV with short 75 mm L/24 gun
Panzer IV F2-J - Panzer IV with long 75 mm L/43 or L/48 gun
StuG IV - Assault Gun. Modified superstructure of Sturmgeschütz III Ausf. G on Panzer IV chassis; armed with
75 mm L/48 gun (Sd.Kfz. 167)
Jagdpanzer IV - Tank Destroyer with 75 mm L/48 gun on Panzer IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 162)
Jagdpanzer IV/70 - Tank Destroyer with 75 mm L/70 gun on Panzer IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 162/1)
Sturmpanzer IV (Brummbär) - with 150 mm field howitzer on Panzer IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 166)
Hornisse - 88 mm PaK43/1 auf Geschützwagen III/IV, later known as Nashorn (Sd. Kfz. 164)
Hummel - 150 mm field howitzer on Geschützwagen III/IV chassis (Sd.Kfz. 165)
Möbelwagen - Anti Aircraft. 37mm FlaK 43 L/89 on Panzer IV chassis (Flakpanzer IV Sd.Kfz.161/3)
Wirbelwind - Anti Aircraft. quadruple 20mm FlaK 38 L/112.5 guns on Panzer IV chassis, with armored turret
(Flakpanzer IV)
Ostwind - Anti Aircraft. 37mm FlaK 43 L/89 on Panzer IV chassis, with armored turret (Flakpanzer IV)
The Panzer IV was originally armed with a low-velocity 75 mm L/24 gun. In 1942 this was upgraded to a 75 mm L/43 gun, and in
1943 to a 75 mm L/48 gun. For the purposes of the above table, both these guns are classed as "long" and displayed on the same row
(Ausf. F2-J).
Panzer V (Panther)
1943 1944 1945 Total
Panther 1,848 3,777 507 6,132
Jagdpanther 1 226 198 425
Total 1,849 4,003 705 6,557
Variants:
Panther Ausf. G
Panther (Panzer V) was armed with a 75 mm KwK 42 L/70 gun (Sd.Kfz.
171)
Jagdpanther - Tank Destroyer with an 88 mm L/71 PaK43gun on Panzer V chassis (Sd.Kfz. 173)
Panzer VI (Tiger)
1942 1943 1944 1945 Total
Tiger I 78 649 623 - 1,350
Sturmtiger - - 18 - 18
Notes:
Tiger I (Panzer VI E/H) was armed with an 88 mm L/56 gun (Sd.Kfz. 181)
Sturmtiger - Based on Tiger I chassis. 380 mm rocket mortar on Tiger I chassis (converted from battle damaged
tanks)
Tiger II (Panzer VI B, also known asKönigstiger) was armed with an 88 mm L/71 gun (Sd.Kfz. 182)
Jagdtiger - Based on Tiger II chassis. Tank Destroyer armed with a 128 mm L/55 PaK44 gun (Sd.Kfz. 186)
Panzer VI Ausf. B Tiger II
Ferdinand/Elefant
1943
Elefant Sd.Kfz. 184 90
Notes:
Assessing the industrial nations' ability to replace combat losses, Guderian compared nations based on the world wide automobile
production for 1936 as follows:
Early in development the Heer settled on the concept of the tank having a commander who was in radio communication with his
superiors. Thus the basic design of the main battle tanks called for a larger turret that would house the tank commander, gunner and
loader, while a driver and a machine gunner were down in the hull. Guderian insisted on the tank commander being in radio
communication with both his platoon and with the members of his own tank crew.[9] Thus the tanks had both a high frequency radio
and an intercom system to allow communication over the din of battle. Though the Panzer III was conceived as the main battle tank
of the Wehrmacht, the Wehrmacht did not anticipate being at war with Europe's major powers in 1939, and few were available at the
start of the war.[10] Excluding Czech built tanks, on 1 September 1939 the invasion of Poland was undertaken with the German
armoured force of 3,195 tanks evenly split between the Pz I training tank and the Pz II light tank, with 1,145 Pz Is, 1,226 Pz IIs. Of
the main battle tanks, only 98 Pz IIIs were in service during the invasion of Poland, along with 211 Pz IVs, with 215 tanks of various
models also available as command tanks after being modified by having their main armament removed and extra communications
equipment installed.[11]
Manufacturing Control
The production of tanks in Germany began in 1934. Due to the insertion of the Nazi Party into the procurement process and political
considerations that had nothing to do with the goal of providing arms for the military, the companies that ended up gaining the
contracts for tank production had limited actual experience in mass production. Ford and Opel, two manufacturers with considerable
knowledge and ability in assembly line techniques, were not allowed to participate in the bidding process.[5] Germany in general and
the German tank production industry in particular was not prepared for the total war that Germany was entering in 1939. In contrast
to the Messerschmitt 109 fighter aircraft, which was designed by Willy Messerschmitt with the production of large numbers of the
aircraft in mind, tank design and production in Germany in 1939 was the work of a craftsman. German industry anticipated
supporting the military in brief conflicts. A full commitment to war production was not made until the midpoint in the conflict.
Surprisingly, civilian vehicle production was not set aside till 1943.
In the run up to the outbreak of war, the large companies engaged in tank production did not have space set aside for expanding their
production lines. In consequence, unlike allied manufacturers, German tank manufacturers never came to a point where they were
stock piling and storing excess finished products. Though these companies did expand with the increased demand of the ongoing war,
it was not until the assignment of Albert Speer as Minister of Armaments that true efforts were made to bring mass production
techniques to the German tank production industry
.
During the period before the war, all companies with the exception of Alkett (which was under the control of Rhine-Metal Borsig, a
subsidiary of the government-controlled Hermann Göring Works) were privately owned stock companies with the stock available for
purchase by the public. All these companies, with the exception again of Alkett, produced tanks in addition to their normal peacetime
manufacture of trucks, locomotives, and other heavy equipment. From 1935 onward, the government progressively increased its
control over industries engaged in rearmament. The Nazi Party's Four Year Plan introduced in 1936 placed Hermann Göring in
leadership of the state's efforts to bring industry into state control.[12] Through threat and coercion Göring was able to expand the
Nazi Party's control of private industry involved in steel and armament production.[13] By 1938, this control included the rationing of
essential raw materials, factory inventories, labor hours, rates of pay, working conditions, building and machine tool expansion, plant
locations and stock dividends. All companies were forced to join the Economic Board of the tank industry which handled all
questions affecting the industry.
Location of German tank manufacturing industry
The tank manufacturing industry in Germany was not concentrated in any one geographic location. Major plants were located in
Nurnberg, Kassel, Brunswick, Magdeburg, and Berlin. There was, however, some geographical concentration of tank component
manufacturers, such as engines and gears in Friedrichshafen, hulls, turrets, and guns in the Ruhr, rubber treads in Hanover, and
instruments in Berlin. These locations, if interdicted, represented a potential choke point to German tank manufacturing.
The allied command structure had thought the Panther tanks seen in Italy were an
unusual heavy tank, and would only be seen in northern France in small numbers, Panther tanks are loaded for
much the same way as the Tiger I was seen in Tunisia. The US Army was confident transport to the front, 1943.
that the Sherman tank would perform well against the German Panzer Mk III and IV
tanks which they expected to meet.[N 1] Shortly before D-Day, rumors indicated that
large numbers of Panther tanks were being used ni the panzer divisions.
To ascertain if this were true the Allies attempted to estimate the number of Panther tanks being produced. To do this they made use
of the serial numbers printed on captured or destroyed German tanks. The principal numbers used were gearbox numbers, as these
fell in two unbroken sequences. Chassis and engine numbers were also used, though their use was more complicated. Various other
components were used to cross-check the analysis. Similar analyses were done on tires, which were known to be sequentially
numbered. The analysis of Panther tank wheels yielded an estimate for the number of wheel molds that were in use. A discussion
with British road wheel makers then allowed the estimation of the number of wheels that could be produced from this many molds.
This in turn yielded the total number of Panthers that were being produced each month. Analysis of road wheels from the two tanks
obtained yielded an estimate of 270 Panthers produced in February 1944 alone, substantially more than had previously been
suspected.
German records after the war showed production for the month of February 1944 was 276.[15] The statistical approach proved to be
far more accurate than conventional intelligence methods, and the phrase German tank problem became accepted as a descriptor for
the statistical analysis used.
See also
German AFVs of World War II
German tanks in World War II
German aircraft production during WW2
Comparison of early World War II tanks
Military production during World War II
Other countries' production figures
France
Soviet Union
United Kingdom
United States
References
Notes
1. An Armored Ground Forces policy statement of November 1943 concluded the following: "The recommendation of a
limited proportion of tanks carrying a 90mm gun is not concurred in for the following reasons: The M4 tank has been
hailed widely as the best tank of the battlefield today
....There appears to be no fear on the part of our forces of the
German Mark VI (Tiger) tank. There can be no basis for the T26 tank other than the conception of a tank-vs.-tank
duel-which is believed to be unsound and unnecessary ."[14]
Citations
Bibliography
Bond, Brian, Liddell Hart: A Study of his Military Thought. London: Cassell, 1977.
Chamberlain, Peter and Hilary L DoyleEncyclopedia Of German Tanks Of World War Two London: Arms & Armour,
1999.
Doyle, Hilary L; Thomas L Jentz; Tony Bryan Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf.G, H and J 1942-45Oxford: Osprey, 2001.
Guderian, Heinz Achtung-Panzer! London, Wellington House, 1937. (Reissue edition, 1999).
Guderian, Heinz (1952).Panzer Leader. New York: Da Capo. ISBN 0-306-81101-4.
Hahn, Fritz Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933 – 1945 Koblenz: Bernard & Graefe, 1987.(in
German)
Liddell Hart, B.H., The German Generals Talk. New York, NY: Morrow, 1948.
Lucas, James World War Two through German Eyes. New York, NY: Sterling, 1987. ISBN 0-85368-831-1
Ogorkiewicz, Richard Armour : the development of mechanized forces and their equipment
. London : Stevens &
Sons, 1960. ISBN
Ruggles, Richard, and Henry Brodie,An empirical approach to economic intelligence in World W
ar II. Publication:
Journal of the American Statistical Association. vol. 42, March, 1947, p. 72-91
Panzertruppen Berlin: Militärverlag der DDR, 1974.(in German)
External links
Production statistics and chassis numbers by month for the iTger I at the Tiger I Information Center
A tour of the Henschel factory that produced T
iger I tanks
Text is available under theCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of theWikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.