Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
&
Validation
1 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
LTE Network Performance KPIs
Understand
KPIs LTE Network
- Network KPIs and their structure
Understand
LTE Integrity KPIs
- Estimation of LTE Integrity KPIs
2 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
KPIs KPIs LTE Network
LTE Network
Retainability Performance
Accessability Integrity, Mobility
eNodeB, Network
4 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
KPIs KPIs LTE Network
LTE Network Targets
Accessability Retainability
E-RAB establishment
success rate > 99,5%
5 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
KPIs KPIs LTE Network
LTE Network Targets
Averaged 700
Throughput ≥ 0,5Mbps 600
per used LTE
Throughput(kbps)
Resource Block 500
400
PESQ- LQ
(Perceptual 300
Evaluation
See table! 200
of Speech
100
Quality –
Listening 0
Quality) -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
SINR
Handover
6 success rate > 98 %
Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Cluster Analysis
7 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Ericsson B Cluster within Regional Branch “South West”
Thrp DL [kbit/s] Thrp UL [kbit/s] Avg User Drb [#] Avg User Ue [#]
35,000 7.0
30,000 6.0
25,000 5.0
20,000 4.0
15,000 3.0
10,000 2.0
5,000 1.0
0 0.0
PRB (Physical Resource Block) measures not available in current release L11A
Number of user calculation not based on TTI but on second samples on user sessions!
Note: Cell throughput take only used TTI time periods [1ms] into account!
8 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Ericsson B Cluster within Regional Branch “South West” / Daily Profiles
Average of P619dl_new Average of P619ul_new Average of Avg_UsersDrb Average of Avg_UsersUe
20,000 1
18,000 0.9
16,000 0.8
14,000 0.7
12,000 0.6
10,000 0.5
8,000 0.4
6,000 0.3
4,000 0.2
2,000 0.1
0 0
00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
Throughput and User daily profile as an average across all 29 cluster cells
9 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Example: Daily Profiles Æ Peak throughput and number of users across a cluster
Max of P619dl_new Max of P619ul_new Max of Avg_UsersDrb Max of Avg_UsersUe
70,000 25
60,000
20
50,000
15
40,000
30,000
10
20,000
10,000
0 0
00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00
10 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Example: LTE User perceived throughput vs. LTE Utilisation
Capacity
Issue!
11 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Traffic volume per hour/ number of data TTIs
LTE DL Throughput cdf VF-D2 Avg2 per week on different days (busy hour)
(two largest averaged figures across 8 days)
12 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
LTE DL Throughput VF-D2; all cells with Avg2 value
13 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
LTE UL Throughput cdf VF-D2
14 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
LTE UL Throughput VF-D2; all cells with Avg2 value
15 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
QoS in LTE: Standardized QCI characteristics
QCI Resourc Priority Packet Packet Example Services
e Type Delay Error
Budget Loss
(NOTE Rate
1) (NOTE 2
)
1 2 100 ms 10-2 Conversational Voice
(NOTE 3)
2 4 150 ms 10-3 Conversational Video (Live Streaming)
(NOTE 3) GBR
3 3 50 ms 10-3 Real Time Gaming
(NOTE 3)
4 5 300 ms 10-6 Non-Conversational Video (Buffered
(NOTE 3) Streaming)
5 1 100 ms 10-6 IMS Signalling
(NOTE 3)
6 Video (Buffered Streaming)
(NOTE 4) 6 300 ms 10-6 TCP-based (e.g., www, e-mail, chat, ftp,
p2p file sharing, progressive video, etc.)
7 Non- Voice,
(NOTE 3) GBR 7 100 ms 10-3 Video (Live Streaming)
Interactive Gaming
8
(NOTE 5) 8 Video (Buffered Streaming)
300 ms 10-6 TCP-based (e.g., www, e-mail, chat, ftp,
p2p file
9 9 sharing, progressive video, etc.)
(NOTE 6)
16 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
NOTE 1: A delay of 20 ms for the delay between a PCRF and a radio base station should be
subtracted from a given PDB to derive the packet delay budget that applies to the radio interface.
This delay is the average between the case where the PCRF is located "close" to the radio base
station (roughly 10 ms) and the case where the PCRF is located "far" from the radio base station,
e.g. in case of roaming with home routed traffic (the one-way packet delay between Europe and
the US west coast is roughly 50 ms). The average takes into account that roaming is a less
typical scenario. It is expected that subtracting this average delay of 20 ms from a given PDB will
lead to desired end-to-end performance in most typical cases. Also, note that the PDB defines an
upper bound. Actual packet delays - in particular for GBR traffic - should typically be lower than
the PDB specified for a QCI as long as the UE has sufficient radio channel quality.
NOTE 2: The rate of non congestion related packet losses that may occur between a radio base
station and a PCRF should be regarded to be negligible. A PELR value specified for a
standardized QCI therefore applies completely to the radio interface between a UE and radio
base station.
NOTE 3: This QCI is typically associated with an operator controlled service, i.e., a service where the
SDF aggregate's uplink / downlink packet filters are known at the point in time when the SDF
aggregate is authorized. In case of E-UTRAN this is the point in time when a corresponding
dedicated EPS bearer is established / modified.
NOTE 4: If the network supports Multimedia Priority Services (MPS) then this QCI could be used for
the prioritization of non real-time data (i.e. most typically TCP-based services/applications) of
MPS subscribers.
NOTE 5: This QCI could be used for a dedicated "premium bearer" (e.g. associated with premium
content) for any subscriber / subscriber group. Also in this case, the SDF aggregate's uplink /
downlink packet filters are known at the point in time when the SDF aggregate is authorized.
Alternatively, this QCI could be used for the default bearer of a UE/PDN for "premium
subscribers".
NOTE 6: This QCI is typically used for the default bearer of a UE/PDN for non privileged subscribers.
Note that AMBR can be used as a "tool" to provide subscriber differentiation between subscriber
groups connected to the same PDN with the same QCI on the default bearer.
17 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
KPIs/PIs in use!
18 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
ANNEX
19 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
LTE Accessability KPIs
Details:
KPI Object to Meausure Way to Grade of
measure Service
LTE Accessibility KPIs
20 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Details: LTE Retainability KPIs
21 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
KPI Object to Meausure Way to Grade of
measure Service
LTE Integrity KPIs
LTE Integrity KPIs
Packet loss rate Number of transmitted packets – ≤ 1%
(PLR) number of received packets/ number of Counters
transmitted packets * 100 [%] at
MAC layer
The cell capacity for a given system Counters BW; 2x
Averaged 5MHz:
bandwidth can then be calculated by
throughput per ≥ 8 Mbps
multiplying the number of resource
LTE cell (cell
block that can be used for user traffic
capacity) BW:
(i.e. total resource blocks – resource
blocks used for signalling) times the 2x10MHz
“Average throughput per used resource ≥ 16 Mbps
block”.
BW;
2x15MHz:
≥ 24 Mbps
BW:
2x20MHz:
≥ 30Mbps
22 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
Details: LTE Mobiliy KPIs
23 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
LTE eNodeB/ Network
Details: Performance KPIs
24 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014
25 Confidentiality level: C2
27 August 2014