Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MARKTAIMANOV
TH E TOU RNAMENT P LAY E R'S REPERTOI RE OF OPEN I NGS
Series ed ited by R. G . Wade, O.B.E.
Sicilian: Paulsen
MARKTAIMANOV
Symbols vi
I ntroduction and Unusual 5th Moves for White
2 5 c4 3
3 5 .lld 3 : Introduction and 5 . . . �c6 15
4 5 .lld 3 �e7 o r 5 . . . g6 21
5 5 .lld 3 �f6 29
6 5 .lld 3 Ac5 41
7 5 �c3 : I ntroduction and 5 . . . b5 47
8 5 �c3 'iitc 7 51
9 5 �c3 �c6 : I ntroduction and 6 Ae2 63
10 5 �c3 �c6 6 g3 70
11 5 �c3 �c6 6 Ae3 'iitc7 7 .lld 3 and Unusual Alternatives 78
12 5 �c3 �c6 6 Ae3 'iitc 7 7 Ae2 87
I ndex of Variations 99
Symbols
+ Check-
;!; + Slight advantage
± + Clear advantage
±± ++ Win ning advantage
Level position
Good move
!! Outstanding move
!? I nteresting move
?! Dubious move
? Weak move
?? Blunder
corr. Correspondence
OL Olympiad
IZ l nterzonal
Ch Championship
1 I ntrod u ct i o n a n d U n u s u al
Sth Moves fo r Wh i te
13 . . . �f4+
Playable alternatives are 1 3
. . . �c7 1 4 .Jld3 e5 1 5 4:lc2 .Jle6
= Boleslavsky-Shagalovich, USS R
1 958; and 1 3 . . . e5 ! ? Now the basic options for White
1 4 �e3 �e3+ are as foll ows :
1 5 fe e5 C41 8 .Jlc2
Or 1 5 . . . 4:ld7 = Boleslavsky C42 8 4:lc2
Kotov, USS R 1 957. C43 9 4:lxc6
1 6 4:lf3 4:lc6 Other continuations give Black
The endgame that has resulted l ess trouble. For example:
offers equal chances; Kavalek a) 8 .Jle3 d 5 ! ? 9 ed ed 10 0-0 .llxc3
Portisch, Halle 1 963. 1 1 be 0-0 =.
The d iagram shows the starting 'l*d4+ (11 . . . �d7 12 'l*g4 0-0
position for a n umber of highly 13 .£Jc4 ± ) 12 ® h 1 'l*xe5 13 .£Jc4
i nteresting modern branches of the 'l*c7 14 .Jlf4 'l*d8 15 i*f3 ±
Pau lsen System. Kuzmin-Popov, Banja Luka 1974.
At this point White's most 8 ®hl
important means of contending In the game de Firmian
for the i nitiative are pawn advances Gheorghiu, Lone Pine 1980, 8 �c3
which extend his central gains: was answered by the sharp 8 . . .
A 7 f4 'l*b6 (another possibil ity is 8 . . .
Velimirovic-Hulak, Yugoslav Ch
1980.
b) 9 <i:ld2 itc7 1 0 <i:l2f3 0-0 11 ite2
<i:lc5 1 2 e5 <i:lxd3 13 itxd3 de
14 fe <i:ld7 15 .llf4 b5 16 §ae1 This idea is al ready famil iar to
<i:lc5 17 ite3 .llb 7 Gaprindashvili
= the reader; compare variation A in
Shamkovich, Lone Pine 1 977. Chapter 2, and variation B3,
c) 9 ite2 itc7 10 c4 0-0 11 <i:lc3 Chapter 4. Of course, this position
;!; Penrose-Darga, England 1963. can be reached by more than one
9 <i:lc5 move-order.
1 0 <i:lc3 0-0 We shall now examine two basic
1 1 .lle 3 plans for fighting against White's
The continuation 11 itg3 <i:lxd3 set-up :
1 2 cd <i:ld7 leads to a position from B1 7 . . . g6
the Rohde-Gheorghiu game already B2 7 . . . .lle 7
mentioned {see note to White's 7 . . . b6? ! 8 <i:lc3 .llb 7 is pre-
8th ) . Tu kmakov recommends 11 mature because of 9 f4! ? <i:lbd7
.lld 2, with the idea of 12 §ae1. 10 f5 e5 1 1 <i:lc2 ± Smyslov-Hort,
11 itc7 Teesside 1 975.
12 a4 b6 B1
13 f5 e5 7 ... g6
14 <i:lb3 Going into what is known as
White's chances in the coming 'the delayed fianchetto variation of
struggle are somewhat preferable. the Paulsen System'. By comparison
He h as a spatial advantage and with similar positions already ex
prospects of a king's side attack. amined {variation B3, Chapter 4),
On the other hand, Black's position Black's possibilities here are more
is sufficiently solid; Tukmakov modest - his knight is already
Shamkovich, USSR Ch 1972. developed on f6, which reduces
32 5 Ad3 lcl f6
t• .. �
- i- � • .. more energetic) 1 0 . . . Af8 1 1
• • • • E!ad1 b6 1 2 f4 f!tc7 1 3 ®h 1 li:Jbd7
•
.. tt �ft-
"-' ··.. • .. 1 4 Af2 Ab7 Mednis-Mi les, Riga
=
":
. �-.;a,, � •
• � �� . 1 979.
��
.!1. U • • ��ft�- . � · ·· " ,,,
d) 9 . . . li:Jc6 (a similar 'opposing
��, lfB
, -�- � �.
lfB t:H�
development' is already familiar to
the reader from variation B22,
9 ... li:Jbd7 but there White had played the less
Bl ack normall y arranges his forceful 9 ®h 1 , so that the situation
pieces on this pattern : . . . li:Jbd7, turned out more pleasantly for
. . . f!tc7, . . . b6, . . . Ab7, . . . E!e8 Black) 1 0 E!c1 (in Murey-Zapata,
and . . . Af8. He can carry this OL 1 980, play proceeded : 1 0 li:Jxc6
out by various move-orders. Usuall y, be 1 1 f4 d 5 ? ! 1 2 e5 d4 1 3 ef
they all lead to similar key pos- ..Q.xf6 1 4 ..Q.xh7+! ? ®xh7 1 5 f!/h5+
5 Ad3 1£l f6 39
11 . . . 0-0
The natural reaction - Black
hastens to mobil ise his forces.
Other plans wh ich h ave been tried
out in practice are :
a) 1 1 . . . 'li!c7 1 2 f4 §b8 (in this
way Black aims to start counterplay
on the queen's side. I f 1 2 . . . b5,
the. possibil ity of 1 3 .Q.xb5 has to
be reckoned with. On 1 2 . . . 0-0,
play transposes into the main l i n e)
i dze-Zurakhov, USS R 1 964, there
1 3 g4! ? b5 (1 3 . . . �xg4? ! 1 4 'litg3)
followed : 1 0 �1 d2 0-0 1 1 0-0-0
14 g5 l£ld7 1 5 h4 (1 5 f5 is also
d6 1 2 f4 b5 1 3 e5 l£ld5 1 4 �-g3
good) 1 5 . . . b4 1 6 �a4 and White
l£lcb4 1 5 �e4 ! ? and a sharp struggle
has the advantage, Hesse-Korolev,
developed, with White having some
corr. 1 978/80.
what the better prospects.
b) 1 1 . .b5 1 2 §d2 ! ? 0-0 1 3
.
1 0 l£lc3 l£lf6
§hdl 'litc7 1 4 f4 b4 1 5 �e2 e5
1 1 0-0-0 (37)
1 6 fe de (1 6 . . . �xe5 ! ? ) 1 7 §fl ! ?
The mo st vigorous way of
l£ld7 1 8 l£lg3 �b6 1 9 {)f5 and
handling this variation. By castling
White's chances of attack against
queen 's side, White not only makes
Black's castled position give him
his queen 's rook immediately avail
the advantage; Byrne-Larsen, Biel
able for the active o perations
1 976.
wh ich he plans on the d-file, but
c) 1 1 . . e5 1 2 §d2 (other good
.
are :
A 7 . . . liJe7
B 7 . . . d6 {with 8 . . . c;Jf6 to
follow)
Other approaches are less advis
able; for examp le:
a) 7 . . . .11c 5 8 liJb3 .Ila7 9 a4
b4 1 0 liJa2 liJc6 1 1 aS ± Zu idema
Szabo, Belgrade 1 964.
b) 7 . . . liJc6 8 liJxc6! ? .11xc6 9
�e2 liJf6 {or 9 . . . d6 1 0 a4 b4
1 1 4:ldS ± Karklins-Evans, USA 1 966.
1 973) 1 0 eS 4:ldS 1 1 4:lxd5 .llx dS b) 8 .11e 3 liJbc6 9 liJb 3 (or 9 ®hl
1 2 a4 ± Tal -Ljubojevic, Montreal 4:lxd4 1 0 .11x d4 liJc6 ) 9 . . .
=
��
..u.. u ft -
. � g g �
'��, - ���@_�
_z_�__
.i:L. -§
Now the principal schemes of Black now has three ma.in
d evelopment at Wh ite's d isposal continuations to choose from :
a.re as fol l ows : Al 6 . bS. .
A 6 g3 A2 6 . 4Jf6
. .
B 6 .l1e2 A3 6 . . .l1b4
.
c 6 f4 Al
D 6 .l1d3 6 ... b5
Also 6 .l1e3 has been played. The purpose of this move is
But in this case Bia.ck easil y solves obvious - Black prepares to oppose
52 5 <Dc3 '!Jtc 7
1 0 ili'e2 c
Practice has also see n : 6 f4 (49)
a ) 1 0 e5? ! ili'xe5 1 1 § e 1 ili'c7 The purpose of such a continu
(another possibil ity is 1 1 . . . ili'd6 ation is to broaden White's central
1 2 Ag5 ili'xd1 1 3 §axd 1 Ae7 base of operations with a view to
1 4 0e4 0f6 1 5 Axf6 gf, as in king's side activity. I ts drawback is
Barie-Miles, Bled 1 979) 1 2 Ah 5 a certain delay in the mobilising
Ae7 1 3 §xe6 g6 1 4 Ele1 (1 4 of his forces.
i!i'd4 fe 1 5 ili'xh8 0-0-0 + ) 1 4 . . . ••
49 .t. • •� ��-
gh ! ? 1 5 0e4 (1 5 ili'd4 f6 + ) 1 5 . ..
03 9 tte2
6 ... .£Jc6 Much the same kind of position
The most logical response to also results from 9 Ag5 Ae7 1 0
White's sixth move. The 'opposi ng' ®h1 d 5 1 1 f4 Tsesh kovsky
development means a defi n ite saving Anikayev, USS R 1 967.
of time. . 9 ... d5
7 .£Jxc6 9 . . . e5 1 0 f4 Ad6 ! ? d eserves
I n th is manner White conducts attentio n ; M ikenas-Kotov, USSR
'the fight fo r the tempo'. The 1 958.
retreat with 7 <£lde2 gives Black 1 0 Ag5 Ab7
no worries. For example : 7 . . . 1 1 f4
.£Jf6 8 0-0 Ae7 {or ·8 . . . b5 9 a3 1 1 Axf6 gf leads to unclear
Ab7 1 0 Af4 d6 = Blau-Gligoric, play, in which Black's possession
Zu rich 1 959 ) 9 f4 d6 1 0 ®hl 0-0 of 'the two bishops' partly compen
1 1 ttel b5 with approxi mate sates for h is inferior pawn structure.
equal ity, Keres-Taimanov, USSR 11 Ae7
1 957. 1 2 e5 .£Jd7
We would point out that 7 Ae3 1 3 Axe7 ® xe7
gives a position that usually arises 1 4 <£la4 c5
from a d ifferent move-order; it 1 5 c4
will be examined in Chapter 1 1 . White 's position is somewhat
7 ... be preferable; Spassky-Petrosian, Palma
On 7 . . . de, the blockading de Mallorca 1 969.
advance 8 a4 is u npleasant.
8 0-0 .£Jf6 (52)
9 5 4l c 3 lflc 6 : I ntrod u cti o n a n d 6 Ae2
4lxf6 with a fully satisfactory game Tbilisi 1 969) 8 4)xc6 i!i'xc6 9 0-0
for Black; Kirov-Taimanov, Wroc Ab7 1 0 Af3 i!i'c7 1 1 e5 §c8
law 1 979. (1 1 . . . §d8!?) 1 2 .!lxb7 i!i'xb7
5 4:lc3 4:lc6: Introduction and 6 lle2 65
1 2 4la4
On 1 2 't'te1 with the th reat of
1 3 4lxd5, as in Planinc-Kirov,
Maribor 1 977, Black should play
1 2 . . . § b8 1 3 .lld 2 .lle 7
=.
12 . . . 4lb6
Larsen recommends 1 2 . . . aS
1 3 c4 Aa6.
Another possibil ity is 12 . . .
0-0 1 3 c4 .lle 7 1 4 .lle 3 aS 1 S §cl
't'tb8 1 6 §f3 with double-edged
play, Matanovic-Damjanovic, Yugo delay in development in order to
slavia 1 977. obtain counterplay.
1 3 c4 .lle 7 The most i mportant attempts by
1 4 .lle 3 4lxa4 Black to seize the in itiative are :
1 5 't'txa4 .ild7 81 7 . . . b S
Or 1 5 . . 0-0 1 6 §ac1 't'tb7
. B 2 7 . . . 4lxd4
1 7 't'tc2 .lld 7 1 8 .lld 3 g6 1 9 't'tf2 Other melhods are less suitable,
§fc8 Parma-Liberzon, Athens 1 976. for example:
1 6 't'tc2 't'tb7 a) 7 . . . .llb 4? ! 8 4lxc6 (8 .ilf3 ? !
1 7 .lld 3 g6 .ilxc3+ 9 be 4laS + ) 8 . . . be
1 8 §ab 1 as (if 8 . . . 't'txc6, then 9 't'td4 .ilxc3+
1 9 't'tf2 0-0 1 0 be 4lf6 1 1 eS 4ld5 1 2 .lld 2 b5
20 §fc1 §fc8 1 3 a4 .llb 7 14 §b 1 ± Parma
Wh ite's game is rather more Tan, Beverwij k 1 963) 9 't'td4
active, but Black's position is .llf8 1 0 e5 d5 (or 1 0 . . . 4le7
sufficiently sol i d ; Liberzon-Larsen, 1 1 .lld 3 ± ) 1 1 ed 't'txd6 1 2 't'txd6
Biel 1 976. .llx d 6 1 3 .llf3 .llb 7 1 4 4le4 .lle 7 1 5
B .ile3 and White has a considerable
7 f4 (56) positional edge, Dely-Navarovsky,
By this method, wh ich is typical Hungarian Ch 1 96S.
of the open ing under consideration, b) 7 . . .ilcS 8 .lle 3 d 6 9 't'td3
.
5 '9c3 '9c6
6 g3 (59)
over the c4 square can make itself 1 0 0-0 �c8 1 1 Ag5 Ae7 1 2 Axe7
felt. '98xe7 1 3 VJ/d2 0-0 1 4 §adl
6 ... VJ/c7 ( 1 4 §fdl ! ?) and White has an
With th is typical 'Paulsen ' man obvious positional plus; Vogt
oeuvre Black is usually preparing Bonsch, Halle 1 978.
to relieve the position with an b ) 7 . b 5 8 0-0 Ab7 9 E!el
. .
Planinc-Misic, Subotica 1 97 5 )
1 0 . . . Aa7 1 1 h3 0-0 1 2 �d2
<£lxd4 1 3 Axd4 Axd4 1 4 �xd4
5 l£lc3 l£lc6 6 g3 75
§bl 0-0 1 4 §b4 dS ! ? and Black I n the event of 8 0-0 Ab7 9 �b3 ! ?
has no problems; Fischer-Matulovic, �f6 1 0 f4 d6 1 1 Y:!!t f3 Ae7 , a
Skopje 1 967. position characteristic of the Schev
c) 7 a3 �f6 8 f4 {8 Ae2 gives a eningen system arises) 8 . . . Y:!!! xc6
position examined under variation 9 0-0 (9 Y:!!t f3 Ab7 1 0 Ad4 Y:!!td 6
B, Chapter 1 2) 8 . . . d6 (8 . . . 1 1 Y:!!te 3 eS 1 2 Ab6 �f6 Petrosian
=
Al 9 . . . Ab7 1 0 Af3
A2 9 . . . Aa3 ! ? This position is frequently en
Other lines have less to recom countered in contemporary practice,
mend them; for example : and arises from various move
a) 9 . . . b4 1 0 Af3 be (or 1 0 . . . orders.
Ab7 1 1 eS ttc7 1 2 <£la4 ± ) 1 1 eS 10 §c8
cb 1 2 §b1 Ab4+ (or 1 2 . . . ttc3+ 1 0 . . . ttc7 is also worth con
1 3 Ad2 ita3 1 4 Axa8 AcS 1 5 ttf3 sidering. For example, 1 1 ttd3
ttxa2 1 6 'ite2 aS 1 7 ttb3 Aa6+ <£le7 (or 1 1 . . . §c8 1 2 0-0-0 Ab4
1 8 ®f3 ttxb3 1 9 cb Aa3 20 Ac3 1 3 Ad4 �f6 1 4 AeS ttc4 - u nclear)
Ad3 21 Axb2 Axb1 22 Axa3 Aa2 1 2 0-0-0 <£lc6 1 3 'itb1 Ae7 with
23 b4 ab 24 Axb4 ± l vkov-Szabo, sharp play, Veli mirovic-Olafsson,
Sarajevo 1 963) 1 3 ®f2 ttc3 1 4 Novi Sad 1 976.
Axa8 f6 1 5 Ae4 !? <£lh6 1 6 ef 1 1 a3
ttxf6 1 7 tthS+ �f7 1 8 c4 g6 I t 's as well to forestall counter
1 9 tte2 Ac3 20 Af3 0-0 21 §hd1 play based on the threatened
and, in the comp lex play that now 1 1 . . . b4.
ensues, White undoubtedly has the Practice has also seen :
better prospects; Spassky-Suetin, a) 1 1 0-0 AcS 1 2 Af2 ttc7 1 3 eS
USSR 1 964. fS ! ? 1 4 Axb7 ttxb7 1 5 a3 <£le7 =
1 981 . 11 lilf6
A2 1 2 .llf3 .llb 7
9 ... .lla 3 !? (76) 1 3 .lld 4 '/!Jxa3
1 3 . . . i!Jc7 is also worth con
sidering; it virtually forces an
exchange on f6, wh ich leads to
double-edged p lay.
1 4 '/!Jd3 '/!Jxd3
1 5 cd 0-0
1 6 §hcl §fc8
1 7 .llb 6
For his sacrificed pawn, White
has definite compensation in the
form of active p lacings for his
An interesting attempt to seize pieces. Therefore, in the end
the in itiative by tactical means. game that has arisen, the chances
1 0 ba may be considered roughly equal ;
1 0 .lld 4 .llx b2 1 1 lilxb5 can be Matanovic-Vasyukov, Yugoslavia
answered by 1 1 . . . .llx al ! ? (1 1 . . . v USSR 1 966.
ab 1 2 .llx b2 '/!Jxe4 is inferior, B
because of 1 3 .llxg7 '/!Jxg2 1 4 .llf3 7 . . . lilf6
'/!Jxg7 1 5 .llxa8 '/!Jc3+ 1 6 ®e2 With this method of develop
.lla 6 1 7 '/!Jd 3 '/!Jc8 1 8 '/!Jd4 ± ment Black generally tries to exert
Perenyi-Barczay, Hungarian Ch pressure on the e4 pawn, utilising
1 9 77) 1 2 .llx a 1 ab 1 3 .llxg7 .!ilf6 ! the resource of an opportune
1 4 .llxf6 (or 1 4 .llx h8 lilxe4 1 5 0-0 bishop sortie to b4.
+ ) 1 4 . . . §g8 1 5 0-0 .!lb 7 1 6 8 0-0
.llx b5 '/!Jc5+ (not 1 6 . . . '/!Jxb5?? I n the event of the prophylactic
1 7 '/!Jd6 ± ±) 1 7 ® h 1 .llc 6, and 8 a3, Black may attempt to exploit
5 <i) c] <i)c6 6 .ll e3 itc 7 7 .ll e2 97
1 966. i£lc6.
Final ly, the immediate 1 1 c5 is 12 . . . <iled5
less effective. After 1 1 . . . <ild5 Alsd after 1 2 . . . b5 1 3 cb
1 2 <ilb3 0-0 (if 1 2 . . . <ilxe3? ill' x c2 1 4 i£lxc2 .Q.d6, the complex
1 3 fe ill'c 6 1 4 .Q.f3 ± ) 1 3 ill'd 4 end ing is in Wh ite's favour.
f5 1 4 .Q.c4 <ilxe3 1 5 fe d6 and 1 3 a3 .Q.a5
Black stands a little better - 1 4 b4 b5
Boleslavsky. I f 1 4 . . . <ilxe3 1 5 fe ill'e 5, then
1 6 ba! ? ill'x e3+ 1 7 ®hl ill' x d4
so .1 •.1.me• B: 1 8 <ilb6 §b8 1 9 §adl , and White's
B •
�t� �- t ,"• t � � t
. • . v.
i nitiative assu mes a menacing char-
acter.
t• •t• • 1 5 i£lc3
• • • • The conti nuation 1 5 cb .Q.xb6
r.-- � ·� ft �
� ····· ·- •
�"'al� � 1 6 <ilxb6 ill'x b6 1 7 <ilb5 <ilxe3
.
� � - .. . " ·� 1 8 <ilc7+ ®e7 1 9 <ilxa8 .<i)xc2
ft g
��- g- -�g� � ft �. ·� "
20 <ilxb6 i£lxa1 is in Black's favour.
�,�, · -. -� · R� 15 . . . <ilxe3
1 5 . . . <ilxc3 1 6 ill' x c3 .Q.b6 is
11 . . . <ilf6 no good, because of 1 7 ill'd 2 .Q.a7
With other replies, Black risks 1 8 .llf4 e5 1 9 .llf3 §b8 20 .llx e5
ending up in a d ifficult position. ±±.
For example : 1 6 fe ill'e 5
a) 11 . . . <ilc5? 1 2 a3 <ilxa4 1 3 ab 1 7 .llf3 .llc7 ! ?
<ilb6 1 4 <ilb5 ! ab 1 5 .Q.xb6 ill'b 8 Black has to sacrifice the ex
1 6 .llc 5 ± ± . change, since the continuation
b) 1 1 . . . f5 1 2 c 5 ( also 1 2 .llf3 1 7 . . . §b8 1 8 ba ill' x e3+ 1 9 ill' f2
.Q.d 6 1 3 .llx e4 fe 1 4 ill' x e4 .Q.xh2+ ill'x c3 20 §ac1 ill'd 3 ( 20 . . . ill'x a5?
1 5 ® h 1 .lle 5 1 6 <ilf3 .Q.f6 1 7 <ilb6 21 ill'g 3 ± ± ) 21 §fd1 ill'g6 22 c6
§b8 1 8 c5 ;!;) 1 2 . . . <ild5 1 3 .Q.f3 is very dangerous for him.
( 1 3 .Q.h5+! ? g6 1 4 .llf 3) 1 3 . . . 1 8 .Q.xa8 ill' x e3+
ill'e 5 1 4 .Q.xe4 fe 1 5 <ilb3 b5 1 9 ®h 1
1 6 cb .Q.d6 1 7 g3 ± Kol ker Of course not 1 9 ill' f2 because
Semenik, corr. 1 979. of 1 9 . . . .llx h2+ 20 ® h 1 ill' h 6 + + .
1 2 c5 19 . . . ill' x d4
5 -ilc3 -ilc6 6 Ae3 -IJfc 7 7 Ae2 95
20 -ile4
Thanks to the activity of his
pieces, Wh ite's chances are prefer
able in the complex struggle which
l ies ahead ; Rittner-Moiseyev, corr.
1 976.
B2
9 ... Ae7
I n this manner Black removes
h is bishop from its insecure post,
and clears the b-fi le for active
operations in case of an exchange 1 3 e5 -ild 5
on c6. I n addition, he threatens to 1 4 Acl
capture on e4. The drawback to I n the case of 1 4 Ad4 c5 1 5 c4
this manoeuvre is its obvious loss cd 1 6 cd *c5 1 7 Jlf3 Ag5 ! ?
of ti me . White achieves noth ing; Mecking
1 0 -ilxc6 Portisch, Sousse 1 967 .
The most logical continuation. 14 . . . Ac5
White 'infiltrates' towards the vu l 1 5 c4
nerable b6 square and creates White gains nothing from 1 5
weaknesses in Black's camp. The *d3, in view of 1 5 . . . 0-0 ! ?
pawn sacrifice 1 0 c4, recommended 1 6 *g3 (or 1 6 *xa6 *xa6 1 7
by Larsen, is experi mental i n Axa6 -ilb4 1 8 Ad3 -ilxd3 1 9 cd
character. Ad4! ? ) 1 6 . . . -ile7 ! ? 1 7 Ad3
=
A
5 .lld 3 .Iles
5 . . b5 ? ! 7 5
.
5 . . 't!!tc 7 7 5
.
5 . .£Jc6 6 .£Jxc6 be 76
. .
6 . . . de 7 f4 78
7 .£Jd2 79
5 . .£Je7 27
. .
5 . . g6. 6 .£Jc3 23
6 0-0 25
6 c4 26
6 Others 23
5 . .£Jf6 6 0-0 't!!tc 7 29
. .
6 . . . d5 29
7 00 Index of Variations
6 . . . d6 7 f4 30
7 c4 g6 <ilc3 .11g 7 9 .11e 3 0-0 1 0 §cl 32
1 0 §e1 33
7 . . . J!i.e7 8 <ilc3 0-0 9 'i!i'e2 36
9 ®h 1 3 7
9 .Q.'e 3 38
6 <ilb3
6 c3 47
6... .11a 7
6 . . . .Q.b6 42
6 . . . .Q.e7 42
7 'i!i'e2
7 'ili'g4 42
7... <£lc6
8 0-0 43
8 .Q.e3 44
B
5 <ilc3 <ilc6
5 .
. . .Q.cS 4 7
5 .. . <ile7 4 7
5 .. . .Q.b4 4 7
5 .. . bS 6 .Q.d3 (Others 48) 6 . . . .Q.b7 7 0-0 <£le7 49
7 . . . d6 50
5 . . 'i!i'c7 6 g3 b5 57
.
6 . . . <ilf6 52
6 . . . .Q.b4 53 .
6 .11e 2 <ilf6 56
6 . . . bS 5 7
6 f4 58
6 Ad3 bS 60
6 • . <ilf6 67
•
6 . . . <ilc6 62
6 Ae3
6 Ac4 63
6 <ilxc6 63
6 Af4 64
6 Ae3 64
6 f4 64
Index of Variations 1 01
9 . . . Ac5 84
7... l£lf6
7 . . . 1£lxd4 87
7 . . . Ab4 8 7
7 . . . 1£la5 8 7
7 . . b 5 8 1£lxc6 -IJ!xc6 9 f4 .ll b 7 89
.
9 . . . Aa3 90
8 0-0
8 a3 90
8... .llb4
8 . . . b5 91
9 1£la4 ! ?
9 . . . 1£le7 92
9 . . . Ae7 95
9 . . . 0-0 96