Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Faculty of Engineering
Shebin El-Kom
Faculty of Engineering
Civil Engineering Department ShebinEl-kom
DESIGNOF IRRIGATION
STRUCTURES
PREPARED BY
Dr.Eng.
Esam El-Deen Helal
Associate Prof.
Civil Eng. Dept.
Faculty of Engineering
Menoufia University
2017
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
Content Page
Chapter (1) Introduction………………………………………………… 1
1. General considerations…………………………………………………………. 1
3. Instructional objectives…………………………………………………………. 5
1. Definition………………………………………………………………………… 10
6. Culvert design…………………………………………………………………… 17
9. Factors of consideration………………………………………………………... 20
10.2.3 Coefficient of head loss due to the entrance and exit culvert…... 29
II
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
III
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
19. Construction…………………………………………………………………… 94
19.1 Foundations………………………………………………………………... 94
19.4 Reinforcement……………………………………………………………... 98
19.5 Forming……………………………………………………………………. 98
19.7 Concreting…………………………………………………………………. 99
IV
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
2.1 Selection of suitable site for water way crossing up works…………….. 140
1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………... 173
V
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
1. Definition………………………………………………………………………… 219
Introduction……………………………………………………………………... 236
VI
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
Definition…………………………………………………………………………… 236
General…………………………………………………………………….………. 246
7. Aesthetics…………………………………………………………………… 247
VII
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
The Primary Concerns for the Design of Nearly any Retaining Wall are…… 252
VIII
Design of Irrigation structures Contents
IX
Design of Irrigation structures List of figures
List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure (1.1): Networks ramifying…………………………………………………….. 1
X
Design of Irrigation structures List of figures
Figure (2.24): Lateral load due to D.E.P and surcharge of live load………………. 42
Figure (2.33): Shape of absolute design moment for one vent cross-section………. 52
Figure (2.39): 3-D layout for 2-vent R.C box culvert ……………………………….. 82
Figure (2.40): 3-D layout for 2-vent steel pipe culvert ……………………………… 83
XI
Design of Irrigation structures List of figures
Figure (3.2): Plan and section of a small canal crossing road………………………. 143
XII
Design of Irrigation structures List of figures
Figure (4.7): Longitudinal section showing culvert part & aqueduct part………... 180
Figure (4.8): Structure system for aqueduct part (Double over hanged beam)…… 180
Figure (4.12): Uplift pressure acting on the lower cord of the pipe of length L’….. 184
Figure (4.20): Loads and bending moment on the upper slab…................................ 193
Figure (4.21): Loads and Straining actions on the aqueduct in the short direction. 194
Figure (4.22): bending moment on the main beam in the short direction…………. 195
Figure (4.23): loads on the main beam in the long direction….................................. 196
Figure (4.25): Reinforcement details for simply supported deep beam …………… 197
XIII
Design of Irrigation structures List of figures
Figure (4.26): Reinforcement details for simply supported deep beam carrying
198
vertical loads……………………………………………………………
Figure (4.27): Bending moment for continuous deep beam ………………….......... 199
Figure (4.29): Reinforcement details for continuous deep beam, El-Behairy …….. 201
Figure (4.30): Calculation of shear reinforcement for deep beam, El-Behairy.…... 201
Figure (4.31): 3-D Layout of open trough (one vent) ….............................................. 202
Figure (5.6): Longitudinal cross section for the tail escape….................................... 222
XIV
Design of Irrigation structures List of photos
List of Photos
Photo Page
Photo (2.1): Pipe culvert in nature with two vents…................................................... 13
Photo (2.2): Culverts for Crossing Natural Drains….................................................. 13
Photo (2.3): Culvert rack…............................................................................................ 27
Photo (2.4): Outlet protection against local scour….................................................... 35
Photo (2.5): Standard truck 60 t…................................................................................ 39
Photo (3.1): Inlet of El salaam syphon…...................................................................... 160
Photo (4.1): Different uses of aqueduct…..................................................................... 176
Photo (4-2): Alloz Aqueduct…....................................................................................... 204
XV
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
-1-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
-2-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
Networks for gravity flow irrigation may consist of open canals and ditchesor of low
pressure buried pipes, or both, in the tail portion of the system.Buried pipes are not
usually economicalin gravity flow irrigation systems wherethe pipe diameter has to be
large enough for a flow exceeding 1000 L/sec.
A canal conveying water from the head works has to run for largedistances and has to
maintain the water levels appropriately, as designed along its length. It has to run
through terrains which generally would have a different slope small than the canal.
The surrounding areas wouldinvariably have its' own drainage system ranging from
small streams tolarge rivers. The canal has to carry the water across these water
bodies as well as across artificial obstacles like railway line or roads .The
mainstructures of a canal system for conveyance of canal flow and control of water
levels are as follows:
1. Pipe conduits, culverts, inverted syphons, and bridges to carry flow under
railways and highways.
2. Aqueducts, syphonacross natural drainage courses or other depressions.
3. Transitions at changes in cross sections, figure (1.2).
-3-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
-4-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
Irrigation is in effect synonymous with artificial flow control from thewater source to
the plant. Planning and design of a flow system should extendfrom the farmer fields
towards the source of water supply. The basic data forthe entire system are those
related to the soil, the climate, the plant, the farmerand his fields. The adequacy of
these data and their correct application willultimately determine the success of the
project. The distribution system mustallow the delivery of a definite quantity of water
to each field and it must bepossible to vary the quantity with time. The need to
savewater and to provide accurate metering facilities from which realistic unit costsof
water can be computed must always be the primary consideration. The amountof
water to be supplied to each farm plot varies from year to year, and evenduring the
same year, depending on the crops grown and the needs of the plantsduring the
various stages of their growth. And, lastly, the effects of the weatherduring the
growing period have to be taken into account.
2. INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES
This course deals with the concepts of planning, layout and design of canal structures
for flow conveyance across artificial and natural obstacles. On completion of this
course, the student shall learn the following:
1. The need for structures of a canal irrigation system for conveying water from
one point to another.
2. Designing of structures for conveying water across, over or under natural.
streams
3. Transitions in canals at change of cross section.
Structures for crossing canals across roads and railway linesthese are structural
elements to convey canal water under roads or railway lines.For small roads, carrying
relatively less traffic, the pipe conduit issufficient. A general view of the pipe conduit
is shown in Figure (1.3). For canals crossing undermajor highways and railway
tracks, reinforced concrete culverts are more commonly adopted. These roads or
railway crossings are usually having a straight profile along its length. The water level
in the canal for this type ofcrossing is lower than the level of the obstruction it
crosses, as may be noticed from Figure (1.4) and the flow through the pipe may be
free or under mild pressure.
-5-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
Pipe road crossings are relatively economical, easily designed and built, and have
proven a reliable means of conveying water under a roadway. Pipe installations are
normally installed by cut and cover method below minor roads but for important
roads, where traffic cannot be interrupted, it may be accomplished by jacking the pipe
through the roadway foundation.
The inverted syphons are structures for canal water conveyance below roads, railway
lines and other structures Figure (1.4). The longitudinal profile is not exactly in a
straight line and the central portion is seen to sag beneath the object to be crossed. The
inverted syphon, therefore, is provided where the water level in the canal is about the
same as the level of the obstruction (Figure 5).
-6-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
Figure (1.5a):Canal full supply level and road level are nearly same
The inverted syphon is a closed conduit designed to run full and under pressure. If
made of pressure pipes, they should be able to withstand the load of cover and wheel
from outside and the hydrostatic head from inside. Transitions for changes in cross
sections are nearly always used at inlet and outlet of a syphon to reduce head losses
and prevent erosion in unlined canals caused by the velocity changes between the
canal and the pipe.
-7-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
Scour can present a particular problem for structures placed in rivers as it can lead to:
1. Undermining and instability of the various elements of the structure;
2. Failure of the complete structures.
Some important methods to reduce this effect include:
1. Streamlining of structures to avoid the onset of turbulent eddies,
2. Scour protection on vulnerable surfaces,
3. Establishing the structural foundation and support below the anticipated depth
of scour.
When the flow velocity falls below critical velocity (which depend on the particle size
and density),bedload ceases and sediment is dropped from suspension. This is called
deposition. If the depositionoccurs in a spatially defined area, it can produce bedforms
on many scales from ripples through tobars, spits and islands. Deposition produces a
corresponding reduction in flow cross section and istherefore self-limiting and often
cyclic.
-8-
Design of Irrigation structuresChapter (1) Introduction
Deposition presents an issue for the performance of fluvial structures by restricting the
potential flowcapacity and by blocking intakes. In canals and navigable rivers,
sedimentation can reduce the draughtavailable for navigation.
-9-
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Culverts
1.Definition
The function of a culvert is to convey surface water across a highway, railroad, or
other embankment. In addition to the hydraulic function, the culvert must carry
construction, highway, railroad, or other traffic and earth loads. Therefore, culvert
design involves both hydraulic and structural design considerations.
Culverts can be divided into two functional types: Stream Crossing and Runoff
Management.The first culvert type, stream crossing culvert, is self-defining. A culvert
is required where theroadway crosses a stream channel to allow water to pass
downstream. The second type culvert, runoff management culvert, is one which is
strategically placed to manage and route roadway runoff along, under, and away from
the roadway. Many times these culverts are used to transport upland runoff,
accumulated in road ditches on the upland side of the roadway, to the lower sidefor
disposal. These culverts are commonly called cross-drains.
A culvert is a closed conduit used to convey water from one area to another,
usually from oneside of a road to the other side.
- 10 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
“blow-outs” which generate a large volume ofsediment deposited directly into the
stream. Align and center the culvert with the existingstream channel whenever
possible. As a minimum, align the culvert with the center of thechannel immediately
downstream of the outlet. If channel excavation is required to help alignthe culvert, it
is frequently best to excavate the upstream channel to fit the culvert entrance andalign
the outlet with the existing natural channel. Minimal disturbance of the channel at
theculvert outlet should be the priority consideration. Inasmuch as possible, the grade
of culvertsshould be determined by the grade of the existing channel, but usually not
less than 0.5% normore than 1%. The outlet should discharge at the existing channel
bottom. A professionalengineer, experienced in hydrology and culvert hydraulics,
should be consulted for determinationof actual culvert grades when dealing with
peculiar alignment or laying conditions, and upon anydeviation from normal and
usual installation procedures. Keep disturbance of the channelbottom, sides, adjacent
land, and surrounding natural landscape to a minimum duringinstallation. Install
energy dissipating structures and/or armor at the outlet where scour anderosion are
likely to occur from high exit velocity due to steep culvert installation, near
proximityto channel banks, drops at the end of the culvert, etc.
- 11 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
within the ditch while allowing access across the ditch. In cases of no head wall,
install
Enoughculverts to extend each end at least two (2) feet past the toes of the road bank
slopes.Install energy dissipating structures and/or armor at the outlet where scour and
erosion are likelyto occur from high exit velocity due to steep culvert installation, near
proximity to ditch banks,drops at the end of the culvert, etc.
Culverts are available in a variety of sizes, shapes, and materials. These factors,
along with several others, affect their capacity and overall performance. Sizes and
shapes may vary from small circular pipes to extremely large arch sections that are
sometimes used in place of bridges.
- 12 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 13 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Culverts Bridges
Is constructed when a road crosses a Is constructed when a road cross a
small waterway big waterway or
If it is a navigable waterway or
in case of high traffic
The water passes completely full The water passes with a free surface
under a certain head (pipe flow) (open channel)
A bigger heading up results from A small heading up results from the
the construction of a culvert (15- construction of a bridge (5-10)cms
20)cms
Culvert section is smaller than Velocity through bridges is smaller
bridge. than through culverts.
Cost of culvert is cheaper than the
bridge
- 14 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
(8.50) (8.50)
ELE
(8.50)
3:2 3:2
(7.25) (7.25)
(8.50) (8.50)
1:1 1:1
X 6.000 X
(7.25) (7.25)
(5.00)
1.80 1.75 1.80 (5.00)
(7.50)
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM
(7.25) (7.25)
PLAN
Figure (2.2): Layout of a canal intersects a road
- 15 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
SEC.ELEVATION X-X
(7.25) 3:2
3:2 2:1
2.0m
1:5
(7.25)
=m
(8.50)
75
(7.50)
.3
r3
(4.00)
1:1
X (7.25) X
(5.00)
1.75 (5.00)
(7.50)
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM
S.V
PLAN
5- Pipe culvert is used as adrainage pipe to escape excess discharges of main canal
into drain.
- 16 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
6. Culvert design
Desing of irrigation
structures
Hydraulic Structural
design design
7. Required Design Information
The hydraulic design of a culvert essentially consists of an analysis of the
required performance of the culvert to convey flow from one side of the
roadway (or other kind of embankment, such as a railroad) to the other. The
designer must estimate the design discharge, and set an allowable headwater
elevation based on the selected design flood and headwater considerations. The
culvert size and type can be selected after the design discharge, controlling
design headwater, slope, tailwater, and allowable outlet velocity have been
determined.
The design of a culvert includes a determination of the following:
• Alignment, grade, and length of culvert.
• Size, type, end treatment, headwater, and outlet velocity.
• Amount and type of cover.
• Public safety issues, including the key question of whether or not to include a
safety/debris rack.
• Pipe material.
- 17 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 18 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 19 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
9. Factors of consideration:
Inlets:
Another factor that significantly affects the performance of a culvert is its inlet
configuration. The culvert inlet may consist of a culvert barrel projecting from the
roadway fill or mitered to the embankment slope. Other inlets have headwalls,
wingwalls, and apron slabs or standard end sections of concrete or metal.
- 20 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 21 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Entrance arrangements
- 22 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
A= (B+Z*y)y
= (2
1
=
Where S is the vent width, H is the vent height or the flow water depth at the
culvert in case of culvert running under free flow condition.
t2
t1
R.C. R.C.
H H
S S S
- 23 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
a) Square section (S = H)
It has maximum area for a given perimeter and minimum friction losses, it easier
constructedand it has a simple framework.
It is economical under heavy loads as horizontal slabs have small spans and it may
require big depth at entrance.
Generally, the width of the culvert is chosen to be equal or bigger than its height (S
= H or S > H). If the width is bigger than the height, more than one vent can be
used. For economical design S = (0.8 →1.5) H
The sum of vents’ width should be smaller than the canal bed width.
The invert level of the culvert is chosen at the canal bed level or lowers in order to
have at least (20→ 30 cms) submergence at the lip of the culvert at its entrance.
If the submergence condition (20→30 cms) not achieved. The bed upstream the
entrance of the culvert, is lowered not more than 0.50 m, through a slope 5: 1 at a
distance of 5.0 ms. A similar arrangement should be made at the downstream side
of the culvert to achieve that culvert should be submerged by the tailwater with 10
cms at least.
The culvert slope should follow the canal slope.
Suitable wing walls i.e. box wing walls for upstream and splayed types at exit of
culvert may be employed but for large irrigation works warped-type wing walls are
used (Egyptian code of Water Resources and Irrigation Works, 2003)
- 24 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Culvert Length
Drop at U.S Drop at D.S
3-whenever possible, the culvert barrel should follow the canal slope.
: head loss between U.S. and D.S. water levels or heading up.
:Gravitationalacceleration.
- 25 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 26 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
= ( )
- 27 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
=
L
- 28 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
10.2.3 Coefficient of head loss due to the entrance and exit culvert
Inlet Control
A culvert operates with inlet control when the flow capacity is controlled at the
entrance by these factors:
• Depth of headwater
• Cross-sectional area
• Barrel shape
When a culvert operates under inlet control, headwater depth and the inlet edge
configuration determine the culvert capacity with the culvert barrel usually flowing
only partially full.
Outlet Control
If the headwater is high enough, the culvert slope sufficiently flat and the culvert
sufficiently long, the control will shift to the outlet. In outlet control, the discharge is a
function of the inlet losses, the headwater depth, the culvert roughness, the culvert
length, the barrel diameter, the culvert slope, and sometimes the tailwater elevation.
• Depth of headwater
• Cross-sectional area
• Culvert shape
• Barrel slope
- 29 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
• Barrel length
• Barrel roughness
• Depth of tailwater
Where:
A = cross-sectional area
H = total head
- 30 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
v = average velocity
Where:
- 31 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
= f forcircular section
= f fornon-circular section
R: hydraulic Radius R =
P: wetted perimeter
- 32 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
b A المادة
0.0305 0.00316 برابخ أسمنتية ملساء
0.0256 0.00497 برابخ حديد ملساء
0.0265 0.00996 برابخ حديد غير قابلة للصدأ
0.0701 0.00401 مبانى طوب وواجهات دستور
- 33 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
form as the flow expands to conform to the natural channel. However, the velocity
and depth of flow at the culvert outlet and the velocity distribution upon reentering the
natural channel are not the only factors that need consideration.The characteristics of
the channel bed and bank material, velocity, and depth of flow in the channel at the
culvert outlet, and the amount of sediment and other debris in the flow are all
contributing factors to scour potential. Due to the variation in expected flows and the
difficulty in evaluating some of these factors, scour prediction is not a very exact
science.Scour in the vicinity of a culvert outlet can be classified into two separate
types called local scour and general stream degradation.
Local scour is typified by a scour hole produced at the culvert outlet. This is the
result of high exit velocities, and the effects extend only a limited distance
downstream.
- 34 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Both local and general scour can occur simultaneously at a culvert outlet.
Protection against scour at culvert outlets varies from limited riprap placement to
complex and expensive energy dissipation. At some locations, use of a rougher
culvert material may alleviate the need for a special outlet protection device. Pre-
formed scour holes (approximating the configuration of naturally formed holes)
dissipate energy while providing a protective lining to the streambed.
- 35 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 36 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
K=
K: coefficient of rigidity
Dead load acting on the culvert equal the weight of earth over the culvert and half
the own weight of the culvert.
- 37 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
=( )
⁄
=
Dead load = +
L2= L1+ d p1
p2=p1* L1/L2
L1
1
d
2
p2
L 2 =L1+d
Figure (2.20): Distribution uniform liveload on culvert
- 38 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 39 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 40 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
The surrounding earth about structure induces a lateral forth on the side of the
structure due to earth pressure and surcharge pressure due to uniform live load.
- 41 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
: repose angle
Figure (2.24): Lateral load due to D.E.P and surcharge of live load
: repose angle
e2=e1+ka*γ2*h2+γw*h2
e1=ka1*γ1*h1+ka2*γ2*h2
e2=e1+ka2*γ2*h2’+ka3*γ3*h3
Figure (2.26): Lateral load in case of stratified soil
- 42 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Pw =
= = =
= =0
= =
- 43 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
= = =
= =
= =0
- 44 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
= = =
=0
= = =0
= = ( )comp
= ( ) comp
- 45 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Two vent
= =
=-
=-
=0
= = =- comp
= =- comp
=e tension
- 46 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
3
1 2 5 3 1 2 3
4 6 H' 4
w w
Two Vents One Vent
wS 1
2
wS 1
2
M1 N1 0.0 M1 N1 0.0
12 1 2k 12 1 k
wS 2 1 3k wS 2 1 3k
M2 N 2 0.0 M2 N 2 0.0
24 1 2k 24 1 k
M 3 M1 N3 0.4 wS M 3 M1 N 3 0.5 wS
M 4 M1 N 4 N3 M 4 M1 N 4 N3
wS 2 1 3k
M5 N 5 0.0
12 1 2k
M 6 0.0 N6 1.2 wS
- 47 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
-
+ + +
B.M.D B.M.D
-
-
+ + +
-
-
--
--
-
N.F.D N.F.D
2- B.M. and N.F. due to Horizontal loads
s' s' s'
1 2 5 3 1 2 3
3
e
4 6 H' e e H' 4 e
- 48 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
B.M.D B.M.D
N.F.D N.F.D
15.3 Tension force in circular cross-section due to internal water pressure
P=
T=
- 49 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
4 pw 6 pw H' pw 4
M2
pw S 2 3kS 2 kH 2 N 2 N1
p S 2
M 2 w
M1 N 2 N1
24(1 2k ) 8
M 3 M1 N3 0.4 pw S M 3 M1 N 3 0.5 p w S
M4
pw 6 H 2 4kH 2 4S 2 N 4 N3
p H 2
M 4 w
M 3 N 4 N3
48(1 2k ) 8
M5
pw S 2 3kS 2 kH 2 N5 N1
12(1 2k )
M 6 0.0 N6 1.2 pw S
- 50 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
B.M.D B.M.D
N.F.D N.F.D
The design positive straining action is the vertical dead loads + any load increases their
values.
The design negative straining action is the vertical dead loads + any load decreases their
values.
Moment due to concentrated live load is always bigger than moment due to uniform load.
One of the two earth pressures must be taken dry or wet not both of them.
- 51 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Considered only the normal force corresponded to the taken bending moment.
Vertical Loads Horizontal Loads Case of Case of
Internal
Rolling Dry Wet Surcharge Water Max. Max.
Load Dead
Live Earth Earth Lateral pressure
Loads +ve -ve
Load pressure pressure pressure Pw
(g1+g2)
P edry ewet es
Moment Moment
Sec. M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N
1
2
3
4
5
6
Figure (2.33): Shape of absolute design moment for one vent cross-section
- 52 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
0.5 m
D
Empirical Dimensions:
Thickness of pipe (t) cm = 0.35 (D (m) +1) +1(mm) ≥ 15 mm
Thickness of foundation tf (m) = 0.2 D (m) + 0.30 m
The pipe may be riveted or welded. The sections of the pipe may be constructed of 2 or 3
parts, each part from 1.0 to 1.5 m wide. Intermediate flange angles may be used to stiffen the
plates.
- 53 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
At a depth exceeding five times the diameter there will not be effect of the weight of the
earth fill, ( h ≥ 5 D)→→ g1 = 0.0.
g2
g2 (t / m ' )
D
Total vertical dead loads g = g1 + g2
Live load
For h < 3 m →→ p2 = p1 (live load intensity at road level)
p1 D
For h > 3 m →→ p2
B
Where B ≈ D +1.2 h
- 54 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Horizontal loads
Earth pressure
Case of dry earth pressure Case of wet earth pressure
- 55 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 56 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Check of Stresses
Section (1) is critical for maximum +ve moment
Section (2) is critical for maximum -ve moment
Section (1) Max. +ve:
Wmax = g1 +g2 + p (live load)
emin= edry
(Wmax emin ) D 2
M max.
16
D
N max. ( p w emin )
2
N max 6 M max
f max. f t .all
t t2
fsteel all = the maximum allowable tensile stresses for steel
Section (2) Max. –ve:
Wmax = g1 +g2 + p (live load)
emin= edry
(Wmax emin ) D 2
M max.
16
D
N max. Wmax
2
N 6 M max
f max. max f c. all
t t2
fsteel all = the maximum allowable compressive stresses for steel
- 57 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Design of RC sections
- 58 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
a) Structures in open air, e.g. bridges and roofs without good isolation.
b) Structures of category on built nearby sea shores.
c) Structures subjected to humidity such as open halls, sheds, and garages.
Category three (severely exposed tension side)
Structures with tension side that are very severely exposed to corrosive
influences of strong chemical attacks, which cause rusting of steel:
- 59 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
To ensure the formed crack width will not allow rusting the steel, the crack width
shouldn’t exceed the following values:
Sec (1 – 1)
Tension side is outside the water ⟾ Air section ⟾ category three
Sec (2 – 2) & (3 – 3)
Tension side is inside the water ⟾ Water section ⟾ Category three
Sec (4 – 4)
Tension side is outside the water ⟾Air section ⟾category three
Section (2, 3) must be checked as un cracked sections to prevent water access to steel
to prevent steel rusting.
- 60 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
1- Concrete cover
Crack width decreases as the concrete cover increases
From the above, to control the crack width the following factors should be
considered:
1- Concrete cover
Concrete cover depends up on the characteristic strength and the structural
element (slab or beam)
- 61 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
One 25 mm 20 mm 20 mm 20 mm
Two 30 mm 25 mm 25 mm 20 mm
Three 35 mm 30 mm 30 mm 25 mm
four 45 mm 40 mm 40 mm 35 mm
* Note:
Concrete cover must be bigger than the maximum diameter of reinforcing steel.
- (Fs): the steel working stress according to working stress design method.
- : the reduction factor of steel yield stresses (Ultimate limit design method).
- 62 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
For Example
For structures of category (3,4), it must be checked that the tensile stress in
concrete sections are less than the allowable tensile stress for concrete. To prevent
concrete cracking so the concrete will prevent liquid access to steel.
Virtual thickness
≥ 100 mm 200 mm 400 mm ≤ 600 mm
(tʋ)
η 1.00 1.30 1.60 1.70
- 63 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Where
tv = t [ 1+ ]
* Note:
- 64 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (I)
This step is performed to make sure that concrete section is un-cracked section and
impermeable for water.
Stage (II)
Concrete sections with tension side exposed to water will be designed throughout
two stages (stage 1,2) according to the following cases:
Stage (I)
b * t (cm) = 100 * k * T
Where
Special Case
t (cm)= k * T (ton)
Fcu (KN/mm2) 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0
Fcto (KN/mm2) 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0
k 0.71 0.67 0.63 0.59 0.56 0.53
- 65 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (II)
As=
⁄
Example (1)
Stage (I)
Stage (II)
Example (2)
Stage (I)
b * t (mm) = 1000 * k * T
⟾ Take t = 400 mm
Stage (II)
- 66 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
As = = 1278 mm 2 ⟾ use 7 ϕ 16
Stage (I)
t (cm)= √
Where
Special case
t (cm) =√
Stage (II)
d = C1 √ & As = *
- 67 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Example (3)
Stage (I)
t (cm) = √ =√ = 19.19 cm
⟾Take t = 20 cm
Stage (II)
Example (4)
Stage (I)
t (cm) = √ = √ = 53.45 mm
⟾ Take t = 55 cm
Stage (II)
- 68 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
As = * = 2.3738 cm2
Choose =
1.3
Then, As min= 3.1 cm2 ⟾ 3 ϕ 12
18.3 Design of sections subjected to B.M & Normal force
Stage (I)
t (cm) = √ - 2 cm
Stage (II)
- 69 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
√
⁄
Stage (I)
Check stresses
Stage (II)
- 70 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
* If
⁄ ⁄
* If
√
⁄
Example (5)
Stage (I)
√ √
Check stresses
[ ] η
- 71 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
√
⁄
Stage (II)
[ ]
⁄
- 72 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Example (6)
⁄ ,
Stage (I)
√ √
Check stresses
[ ]
[ ] η
√
⁄
Stage (II)
- 73 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
[ ]
⁄
18.4 Design of T & L sections subjected to (B.M) or (B.M & Normal force)
{ {
- 74 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (I)
Beam depth should be decreased because the inertia for (T &L) sections is greater
than the inertia for (R-section) that have the same (b, t).
Check stresses
- 75 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (II)
B.M only
√
⁄
√
⁄
- 76 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (I)
Check stresses
Stage (II)
*Notice that: the flange located in the tension side, so the section is (R-section)
(B.M only)
√
⁄
√
⁄
- 77 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (I)
b * t (cm) = 100 * k * T
Special case
t (cm)= k * T (ton)
Where
Stage (II)
As=
⁄
Stage (I)
t (cm)= √
Special case
t (cm)= √
Where
- 78 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (II)
d = C1 √ & As = *
Stage (I)
Stage (II)
√
⁄
- 79 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (I)
Check stresses
Stage (II)
* If
⁄ ⁄
* If
√
⁄
- 80 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 81 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
(8.50) (8.50)
(7.25) 3:2 3:2 (7.25)
(7.00)
(6.62)
( 6.25 ) ( 6.25 )
1:1 1:1
(5.00) (5.00)
(4.75) (4.75)
(4.00) (4.00)
ELE
- 83 -
3:2 3:2
(7.25) (7.25)
(8.50) (8.50)
Design of Irrigation structures
(7.50)
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM
(7.25) (7.25)
PLAN
PIPE CULVERT
Chapter (2) Culvert
(13.70) (13.70)
15:1 15:1
(13.20) (13.20)
(12.20) 2:1 (12.70) (12.70) 2:1
(12.20)
(11.40)
1:1 1:1
(10.00)
(9.60) (9.30)
SEC. ELEVATION
(13.20) 15:1 15:1
- 84 -
(13.70)
2:1 2:1
(12.20)
1:1 1:1
Design of Irrigation structures
1:1
(10.00)
1:4 1:4
PLAN (H.E.R)
R.C BOX CULVERT
Chapter (2) Culvert
- 85 -
2:1 2:1 2:1
(12.20) 10:1 10:1 (12.20)
2:1
(12.50) (13.85)
1:1 1:1
Design of Irrigation structures
10:1
4.00
2.00
(9.50)
0.35
(12.70)
X X
plan (H.E.R)
0.20 0.5
1.00
(9.50)
SEC. X-X
Chapter (2) Culvert
- 86 -
2.0m
1:5
(7.25)
= m
75 (8.50)
.3 (7.50)
r3
(4.00)
1:1
Design of Irrigation structures
X (7.25) X
(5.00)
1.75 (5.00)
(7.50)
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM
S.V
PLAN
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 88 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 89 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 90 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Figure (2.51): Plan for one vent R.C box culvert with rectangular cross section
- 91 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 92 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
19. CONSTRUCTION
Though culverts are frequently considered minor structures their proper
construction is of major importance to the serviceability of the roadway. Foundations
must becarefully prepared. Decisions must be made as to the type and amount of
foundation backfill material required. Forms must be set tightly and adequately
braced. Reinforcement steel must be carefully placed and tied. Good quality concrete
must be produced and poured and must be done in accordance with the Specifications
and sound engineering judgment must be used if the culvert is to fulfill its function.
19.1 Foundations
Culvert foundation conditions, because of the location of culverts and flow line
considerations, are rarely ideal. Fortunately, however, culverts, because of the large
area over which their load is spread, do not require foundation material capable of
supporting high concentrations of loading.
- 93 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
the job site while the culvert is being constructed and backfilled. The culvert
foundation report will normally cover the following topics:
A) Foundation on Soil
When the culvert is to be founded on soil, which will be the case the majority of
the time, the report will recommend the amount and type of backfill material to be
used. A statement might be made saying “undercut this foundation ____ feet and
backfill
With type ____ backfill”. This statement might be varied to apply only to stated
portions of the foundation area. In this case it would be expected that this amount of
backfill would be provided if the flow line was raised or lowered. Of course, if actual
soil conditions are not as shown on the profile, the amount and type of the backfill
may be changed to reflect the actual field conditions.
B) Foundations on Rock
Any time isolated high points in rock are encountered, a Type II backfill material
may be required for a cushion effect to avoid point loads. If the character of the rock
is such that the bottom slab of the culvert may be omitted and the culvert walls
founded on footings on rock, this will be plainly stated in the soils report. In the
- 94 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
absence of a specific statement allowing the omission of the bottom slab, the bottom
slab must be poured.
C) Foundations on Piles
In some cases, it will be necessary to found culverts on piles. In these cases Special
Design Plans and details will be provided. The construction of the pile foundations
will be as covered in the Specifications and in Chapter 2 of this manual.
These conditions can cause the fill and the riding surface on either side of the
culvert to settle leaving a hump in the riding surface. The soils section of the Office of
Materials and Research has developed two steps to be taken to counteract this
settlement. These two steps may be used individually or in combination. They are: (1)
require 100% compaction to a distance of 50’ from each culvert wall. A Class II or
- 95 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
better soil according to the Standard Specifications should be used within this area.
(2) Require the removal of compressible material adjacent to the culvert and backfill
with select material requiring 100% compaction. Unless otherwise stated in the
foundation report, the compressible material should be removed to a distance of 50’
from each culvert wall. Where the compressible soils are excavated and the backfill
material will be below the ground water table, Class IA or IA materials according to
the Standard Specification should be used.
If the Office of Materials and Research feels that these steps are necessary this will
be so stated in the culvert foundation investigation report. The design office should
also the Plans the matter should be referred to the District Construction Engineer.
The foundation must be excavated to the depth of the footings or the undercut as
called for on the Plans, in the foundation report, or decided upon from field
observations. Care must be taken not to over excavate or to disturb the material below
the plane of excavation. The less the activity within the area the better.
Diversions are required to allow construction of the culvert while at the same time
preventing erosion. Water must be diverted and seepage into the footing area removed
by pumping from sumps outside of the footing area or by diversions. When widening
a two barrel culvert (or larger) water may be dammed up in one of the barrels and
diverted around the construction area by pumping. Diversions can also consist of
plastic lined channels which capture the water upstream of the culvert and carry it
around the construction area. Sometimes a combination of these methods works best.
After the excavation is complete the proper backfill material will be placed and
compacted in accordance with the Specifications.
- 96 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
19.4 Reinforcement
19.5 Forming
The function of forms is to act as a structural unit in holding and supporting plastic
concrete to the desired configuration until such time as the hardened concrete can
support itself. The forms must be so designed, supported, and tied together so that
- 97 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
they will not sag, bulge, sway or become misaligned. The forms must be set so that
concrete of the proper configuration will be obtained.
The Engineer must also check the size of the formed footings, the depth of the
forms, the alignment of the forms, the height of the wall forms and all of the details
necessary to produce the finished structure as detailed on the Plans. Every dimension
should be checked during the forming and again after the forms are complete before
the pour is commenced.
Special attention must be paid to the forming of cut-off walls. Weep hole locations
must also be carefully checked.
Transverse Construction joints must be made in the barrel of the culvert at all
locations indicated on the plans and at all design change locations. These must be full
construction joints, constructed at an angle of 90° with the barrel. After the concrete
has achieved its initial set in a floor or top slab pour, it is permissible to remove a
header and pour the adjacent section. When this is done the concrete surface along the
joint must be coated with curing compound to prevent bond of the two surfaces.
At all transverse construction joints outside the limits of the payment width,
reinforcement steel must not extend through the joint. Construction joints inside the
limits of the pavement width should be avoided. However, if conditions require that
such a joint be made, all longitudinal reinforcement steel must be extended through
the joint for a distance of at least one-foot, with no bond-breaking procedure as in the
above paragraph.
19.7 Concreting
All placement equipment such as chutes, vibrators, tremies, etc. should be checked
before placement commences. Stand-by equipment should also be checked.
- 98 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
19.8 Backfilling
In placing backfill material around the culvert care must be taken not to damage
the culvert by loading one side more than the other. Backfilling must be done on both
sides of the culvert so that the backfill on one side of the culvert will never be more
than 3’ higher than on the other side of the culvert.
- 99 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
A road way crosses a canal at right angle, the canal is proposed to pass
through a culvert under the embankment of the road. the culvert is feeding are
claimed area of 20.000 fed. With maximum water duty 70 m3/ f/day .
Canal data:
Road data :
If the heading up not exceeds 20 cm , and the moving load is 60 ton lorry .
- 100 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Hydraulic calculation
Q= Asurvx W.D
Q=16.20 m3 /sec .
Aw.w = by+zy2
=8x2.25+1.50x2.252
Aw.w = 25.59 m2
Vw.w =
=
Vw.w = 0.63 m/sec.
(2-3)Vw.w = (1.26-1.89)
Vculvert =
1-1.5 m/sec.
Aculvert=
= =12 m2.
b =√ =3.46
bxh=3.50*3.50
- 101 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
2.25+d =3.5+0.10
d =1.35 0.50m
Aonevent = =6m2
b =2.45
use drop
2.25+d =2.45+0.1
Vact =
hL=krack.V2u.s/2g +V2cul(ke+kf+ko)/2g
krack= Φ . (t/b)(4/3).sinα
=1.79*(2.5/30)(4/3) *sin70
=0.0612
Vu.s=
=1.57 m / sec
- 102 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Kf =f
f=0.02
R=
R = 0.613
Kf = f
= 0.02*
Kf = 0.158
=0.162 m
- 103 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Note:
Drop can't be used in this example by using rectangular section instead of square section
with b/h ≤1.50 for economic design.
Structural Design:
t1=h/(6-8)
t2=S/(6-8)
take t1=t2=t
t=245/(6-8)
=40.83-30.63 cm
- 104 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
= {1/2(12+13.45)*1.45*1.65 )}/13.45
g2 =2.26 t/m'
g= g1 + g2
=1.42+2.26
g= 3.68 t/m'
f'=
= 3.85 t/m'
- 105 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
2) Horizontal loads
e1=k.γs.h
K=
K= 0.406
e1=0.406*1.65*1.62
e2= kγs h2
= 0.406*1.65*4.42
e2=2.96 t/m
eavg.=
To getƔsub
Assume n = 30%
Ɣsub= Ɣb +n - Ɣw
=1.65+0.30- 1.0
=0.95 t/m3
- 106 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
e2= 0.406*1.70+0.406*0.95*2.72
+1*2.72
e2=4.46t/m
eavg=
eavg= 2.78t/m
Surcharge
P =f1*
=3.85*
= 6.79 t/m
Es= k*p
= 0.406*6.79
=2.76t/m
- 107 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
P= γ.y
Y = 5.26-3.68
Y = 1.58m
P= 1*1.58
=1.58 t/m
- 108 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
The bending moments and the normal forces values for different cases of loading are
listed in the following table to get the design moment and the corresponding normal force.
- - + - + - + - + +
1
3.2 0.0 3.35 0.0 0.44 2.84 .605 3.89 0.6 3.86 1.03 2.20
+ + - - - - - - - +
2
1.6 0.0 1.68 0.0 0.66 2.84 0.9 3.89 0.9 3.86 0.52 2.2
- - - - - - - - + +
3
0.8 0.0 .838 0.0 0.88 2.84 1.21 3.89 1.20 3.86 1.38 2.2
- - - - - - - + +
4
0.8 4.12 .838 4.31 0.88 0.0 1.21 0.0 1.20 0.0 1.38 1.77
- - - - + + + - +
5
0.8 4.12 .838 4.31 1.11 0.0 1.51 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.52 1.77
- - +
6
0.0 12.3 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3
Design of sections :
Note :
If tension side is exposed to the water in water structures , the se sections should be
designed as non-cracked section .
- 109 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Stage (1)
t= √ -2cm
=√ -2
=39.7 taket = 40 cm
Check stress
Ft= - +
= + = -1.65+ 19.53
ft=17.88 kglcm2
tv = t [1- ]
= 40[ 1- ]
=36.62 cm
√
fct =
√
=
- 110 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
fct=18.75 kglcm2
Ft fct safe
Stage 2
Mult = 1.50*5.21
=7.82 m.t
Nult = 1.5*6.70
= 10.05 t
e= =
es = e + ⁄ -c = 0.78 + - 0.04
es =0.94 m
Mus = N.es
= 10.05* 0.94
=9.45t.m
d=40-4=35 cm
d=C1√
36=C1√
C1=5.86 j= 0.826
As = *( )
- 111 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Nu=1.5*25.3= 37.95t
Nu= 0.35 Ac fcu +0.67 fyAsc
37.95*103= 0.35*100*35*250+0.67*3600-Asc
As= -ve value
Use As min
µmin =0.6% Ac chosen Asmin = *35 *100= 21 cm2 use 20ϕ 12( 5ϕ12/m'
each side )
- 112 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 113 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 114 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
The director Engineer requested from dean of faculty of engineering and the
director of consulting and research center at faculty of engineering, Menoufia
University to perform a commission. This commission was formed from
- 115 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 116 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 117 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 118 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 119 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 120 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 121 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 122 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Sap output
- 123 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 124 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 125 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 126 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 127 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 128 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 129 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 130 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 131 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
- 132 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Assignment
1. A canal crosses a road at a right angle; the canal is allowed to pass through a culvert
under the embankment of road.
Canal data
Bed width=5.0 m, bed level= (10.50) m+MSL
Water level= (12.20) berm level = (12.70)
Bank level = (13.70) discharge = 6 m3/s
Side slopes from bed to berm =1:1, from berm to road = 3:2,
Road data
Road width =10.0 m, Road level = (14.20), Side slopes 3:2
Soil data
γsoil=1.65 t/m3, ϕsoil = 30oand maximum bearing capacity = 1.6 kg/cm2
If the heading up shouldn’t exceeds 20 cm, and the moving live loads is supposed to be
60ton lorry.
It's required to:
Complete hydraulic and structural design of the culvert.
Drawings plan H.E.R., sec. elevation, U.S. sec. side view D.S. side view.
Draw RFT details of the culvert.
Road data
Road width = 6.0 m, Road level = (9.00), Side slopes 2:1
Soil data
γsoildry =1.80 t/m3, γsoilsat. = 2.1 t/m3, ϕ= 30o and maximum bearing capacity = 1.6
kg/cm2
If the heading-up shouldn’t exceeds 20 cm, and the moving live loads is supposed to be
a uniform distributed L.L = 1 t/m2, fall tension =1.4 t/cm2, andfall compression =1.2
t/cm2
Design a steel pipe culvert; by carried out the following:
Hydraulic design
- 133 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (2) Culvert
Road data
Road width = 8.0 m, Road level = (9.00), Side slopes 2:1
Soil data
γsoildry =1.80 t/m3, γsoilsat. = 2.1 t/m3, angle of internal friction = 30o and maximum
bearing capacity = 1.6 kg/cm2
If the heading-up shouldn’t exceeds 6.0 cm, and the rolling load is 60 ton lorry, uniform
live load = 0.60 t/m2, fall tension =1.4 t/cm2, andfall compression =1.2 t/cm2
- 134 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Syphon
1. Definition
Syphon, it is crossing up structure used to path water way under another water
way to satisfy the following:
Navigable waterway
The Non-navigable channel passes through the syphon or passes below the
navigable one.
Greater discharge
The waterway having the smaller discharge may pass through the syphon
High bed levels
The waterway having the lower bed levels may pass through the syphon
Drain
Usually, a drain passes below a canal. But when the drain is relatively large or
navigable, the canal passes below the drain according to the above considerations.
- 139 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
At the site, the drainage should cross the canal alignment at right angles. Such a
site provides good flow conditions and the cost of the structure is usually a
minimum.
The stream at the site should be stable and should have stable banks.
For economical design and construction of foundations, a firm and strong sub-
stratum should exit below the bed of the drainage at a reasonable depth.
The site should be such that long and high approaches of the canal are not
required.
The length and height of the marginal banks and guide banks for the drainage
should be small.
In the case of an aqueduct, sufficient headway should be available between the
canal trough and the high flood level of the drainage.
The water table at the site should not be high, because it will create De-watering
problems for laying foundations.
As far as possible, the site should be selected d/s of the confluence of two streams,
thereby avoiding the necessity of construction of two cross-drainage works.
The possibility of diverting one stream into another stream upstream of the canal
crossing should also be considered and adopted, if found feasible and economical.
A cross-drainage work should be combined with a bridge, if required. If necessary,
the bridge site can be shifted to the cross-drainage work or vice versa. The cost of
the combined structure is usually less. Moreover, the marginal banks and guide
banks required for the river training can be used as the approaches for the village
roads.
- 140 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
3. Inverted Syphon
Inverted syphons are used to covey canal water by gravity under roads, railroads,
another waterway, other structures, various types of drainage channels, and depressions.
A syphon is a closed conduit designed to run full and under pressure. The structure
should be operated without excess head when flowing at design capacity.
- 141 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
a) Pipe
All pipe subjected to internal pressure should have watertight joints. Precast
reinforced concrete pressure pipe (PCP), asbestos-cement pressure pipe (AC), or
reinforced plastic mortar pressure pipe (RPM), all with rubber gasket joints, are used to
insure water tightness. For heads up to 150 feet precast reinforced concrete pressure pipe
is most frequently used but any of the above types may be used depending on their
availability and cost considerations.
1) At all syphons crossing under roads other than farm roads and syphons crossing
under railroads, a minimum of 1meter of earth cover should be provided. Farm
roads require only 0.6meter of earth cover and are frequently ramped using 10 to 1
slopes ( 10 percent grade) when necessary to provide minimum cover
requirements. If roadway ditches exist and are extended over the pipe, the
minimum distance from the ditch to the top of the pipe should be 0.65 meter.
2) At syphon s crossing under cross-drainage channels, a minimum of 1 meter of
earth cover should be provided unless studies indicate more cover is required
because of projected future retrogressions of the channel.
3) At syphons crossing under an earth canal, a minimum of 0.5 meter of earth cover
should be provided.
4) At syphons crossing under a lined canal, a minimum of 0.15 meter of earth cover
should be provided between the canal lining and the top of pipe.
Pipe slopes should not be steeper than 2 to 1 and should not be flatter than a slope of
0.005.
b) Transition
Transitions are nearly always used at the inlet and outlet of a syphon to reduce head
losses and prevent canal erosion in unlined canals by causing the velocity change
between the canal and pipe to be less abrupt. Concrete, earth, or combinations of concrete
and earth transitions are used for this purpose.
c) Pipe Collars
Pipe collars are not normally required on syphons but they may be needed to reduce the
velocity of the water moving along the outside of the pipe or through the surrounding
earth thereby preventing removal of soil particles (piping) at the point of emergence. Pipe
collars may also be necessary to discourage rodents from burrowing along the pipe.
- 142 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
The canal bank freeboard upstream from syphons should be increased 50 percent (1.0
foot maximum) to prevent washouts at these locations due to more storm runoff being
taken into the canal than anticipated or by improper operation. The increased freeboard
should extend a distance from the structure such that damage caused by overtopping the
canal banks would be minimal; but in any event a minimum distance of 50 feet from the
structure.
- 143 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
4. Material of construction
An old type was used in the past and not used now. It had top and bottom arched
shape. Furthermore, it may consist of one vent or more. In addition, box syphons may be
constructed with one vent or more.
- 144 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Steel syphon is the most common type in irrigation works till now and the pipe
diameter depends on the hydraulic calculations. The following consideration should
be followed (Irrigation code 2003).
Pipe diameter should not exceed the bed width of the waterway with suitable
choice of pipe diameter and the number of pipes to avoid eddies and vortices.
If the diameter of pipes is less than 70 cms, the pipes will lie on the soil without
concrete foundations. A concrete foundation is used for pipes with diameter
larger than 70 cms, and the foundations may be continuous or isolated with
suitable distances under the pipes to avoid the bending in steel pipes. The
continuous foundation thickness should not less than (D/5+0.30) m where D is
the pipe diameter in (ms).
If the soil is sandy, it is enough to lay the pipe through the sand as it is a good
protective material for steel pipes.
If more than on pipe is used, from (0.50 → 0.80 m) space between pipelines filled
with concrete.
Each pipe is made of steel plate (10 → 15 mm) riveted together, to form the
required shape and diameter. Each pipe is formed of short parts, each of about
3.0 ms long
Cast iron is not used in irrigation works because they are heavy and expensive.
The diameter of steel pipes may reach 2.0 ms.
In the case of soft soil, in order to avoid bending in steel pipes, they are
embedded in concrete to protect the pipes from rusting and form a kind of an
arch all around the pipes. It helps in resisting the pressure and works when the
pipe is worn out.
For 1.0 m length of the pipe
fs. 2t. 1 = p. D
Where fsis the tensile stress of steel (t/m2), t is the thickness of steel pipe (cm), p
is the internal water pressure (t/m2) and D is the pipe diameter (m). The
thickness of steel pipe t (cm) = 0.35 [D (m) +1]
The thickness t has to be increased by 1.0 mm for rusting, t = (10 → 15 mm).
The flange angle is found by a = 2.8 (D + 1)
Where a is the equal angle in (cms) and D is the pipe diameter in (ms)
Rivet diameter ϕ = 2t, and pitch = 4ϕ. The pipe is made of 3 plates each (1→ 1.5
ms) wide.
- 145 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Masonry heads (Breast Walls) are required at either inlet or end of the syphon for
pipes larger than 70 cms. For smaller diameters, it is sufficient to use pitching at
entrance and exit from the syphon.
Vertical walls are constructed perpendicular to the flow direction. In the case of
the walls are significantly high, Relief Ring Arches above the pipes may be used
to protect the pipes from damage that may arise due to the weight of the wall
- 146 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
The width of the wall at the earth side is decreased gradually by 13 cms each 0.5
m height
Precast reinforced concrete pipes can be used with diameters up to 2.0 ms, and
(2→3 m) length. The pipes are joined with precast collars and should have
watertight joints. Expansion joints are provided and asphalt is used to make these
joints watertight.
- 147 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
For larger sizes R.C. sections, precast box sections are used with one or more vents
and prepared at the site.
Neglecting concrete in tension and all forces will be resisted by steel bars.
Circular hoops
In the case where level in the syphon channel is not low enough, a drop in bed
(either sudden or gradual) is made at the entrance and gradual rise is made at
the exit.
Velocity through syphon being 1→2 m/s does not allow sediment deposition or
scouring the material of construction.
Screen may be provided for closed conduits at the upstream side only.
In the case where the water level in the syphon channel is low, the bed level of
the syphon may be made straight. The banks and berms must be made wide
enough to allow for hydraulic gradient equal at least 7:1. Hydraulic gradient
steeper than 7:1 will result in big velocities or percolation through the soil.
Straight Syphon
Water level of waterway 1 < Bed level of waterway 2
Length of syphon
L= 2 x [Bed width 2/2 + (Berm level 2- Bed level 2) x Z2-1 + Berm width 2+ (Bank level 2 –
Berm level 2) x Z2-2 + Bank with 2 + (Bank level 2 – Berm 1) x Z1-2 + (1→ 1.5 m)]
- 148 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Syphons may be provided with an intermediate escape to get rid of the excess
water of the canal to the drain.
- 149 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
- 150 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Available head, economy, and allowable pipe velocities determine the size of the
syphon pipe. Thus, it is necessary to assume internal dimensions for the syphon and
compute head losses such as entrance, pipe friction, pipe bend, and exit. The sum of all
the computed losses should approximate the difference in energy grade elevation between
the upstream and downstream ends of the syphon (available head).
A= (B + Z*y) y
Screen Losses
Friction Losses
Entrance and Exit Losses
Elbows and Bends Losses
- 151 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Screen, friction, and entrance and exit losses are calculated as explained before in
culvert, while the elbow and bend losses are calculated as follow:
Syphons contain horizontal and sloped parts the joint between the two parts may be
constructed as Elbow or Bend.
For Elbow connection, the coefficient of head loss due to elbow is calculated from the
following equation:
𝜃 𝜃
𝐾𝑏 = sin2 + 2sin4 where 𝜃 angle of elbow with horizontal.
2 2
ϴo 20 40 60 80 90
Kb 0.03 0.14 0.39 0.75 1.00 Figure (3.7): Elbow at Syphon
For bend connection, the coefficient of head loss due to elbow is calculated from the
following equation:
𝛳
𝐾𝑏 = 𝐶 ∗ Where 𝜃 angle of bend with horizontal.
90
Where,
- 152 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Note:The Bends are preferred than Elbows in syphons to decrease the losses.
The velocity through syphon should be (2-3) the velocity through water way and not less
than 1.0m/sec to avoid sedimentation in pipes or box sections.
Cases of loading
According to the Egyptian code 2003, the general cases of loading for box or pipe section
of syphon are shown in the following longitudinal section
- 153 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Generally the worst cases which have been considered are sections I-I and IV-
IV.
For large syphons seismic load have been considered according to the Egyptian code for
loads and forces calculations in the construction and building works.
The section I-I (culvert part) and section IV-IV (syphon part) can be design as the same
way as the culvert.
(𝑤−𝑒)𝑑 2
𝑀𝑎𝑥 = ±
16
𝑤𝑑
N=
2
- 154 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Bending moment for vertical loads Bending moment for lateral loads
Figure (3.10): Bending moments for pipe section for vertical loads and Earth
pressure
Figure (3.11): 3-D view for brick arch syphon with two vents
- 155 -
ARCH SYPHON
Chapter (3) Syphon
1:20 (19.00)
2:1
(18.00) (17.75)
(16.50) 3:2 3:2
(14.00) (14.75)
1:1
(10.75) 1:10 (10.87)
(10.25)
- 156 -
3:2
3:2
(16.50)
8.0 m
(14.75)
(17.75)
Design of Irrigation Structures
1:1 3:2
1:1 2:1 3:2
1:1
10:1 (10.25)
(10.75)
1.00
(16.50)
2.75
1:1
PLAN (H.E.R)
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
- 157 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
El-Salam Canal is located in the North East of Egypt where it supplies water for the
reclamation of new lands in that part of the country. These areas are originally parts of
the sedimentary formation of the ancient Nile branches in that area. The canal intake is on
the right bank of Damietta Branch at Km 219, 3.0 Km upstream the Faraskur Dam. The
canal passes through five governorates: Damietta, Dakahliya, Sharkiya, PortSaid and
North Sinai, it lies between longitudes 31° 45` & 34° 05` and latitudes 30° 42` & 31° 24`.
The total length of the canal is about 277 Km and is divided into two main parts. The first
part is West of Suez Canal, it is about 86 Km long and the second part lies east of Suez
Canal and is about 191 Km long. The western part of the canal is known as El-Salam
Canal. It starts from the intake at Damietta Branch (Nile River) runs in a south-eastern
direction and crosses the Suez Canal through a syphon, it continues after the syphon and
the eastern part of the canal is known as El-Sheikh Gaber Canal as shown in the below
layout.
- 158 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
El-Salam Canal was designed to supply the irrigation water to a total area of 620,000
feddans consisting of 220 thousand feddans on the western side of the Suez Canal and
400 thousand feddans east of the Suez Canal in Sinai. The canal was planned to convey a
discharge of 4.45 billion m3/year. About 2.2 billion m3/year would be fresh water
supplied from the Nile and transferred through the canal at its intake. Moreover,about
2.25 billion m3/year is to be supplied from two drains called Bahr Hadous and Lower
Serw drains. Nile water mixed with agricultural drainage water at a ratio of 1:1 so that
salinity ratio would not exceed 1000 particles per million along with selecting the proper
crops combinations.
It considered the second phase of El-Salam Canal Project. The syphon has 4 tunnels,
each of which is 750 m long with an inner diameter of 5.1 m, at a depth of 45m beneath
the Canal, fixing a pipeline to transfer the water of the main canal to Beir Al-Abd, Al-
Saroe and Al-Quareir, constructing 5 pumping and lifting stations and digging about 35
km east Suez Canal.
- 159 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
- 160 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
8. Solved Example
Solved example
Drain dada :
Canal data :
Soil data :
It is required to make :
- 161 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Hydraulic design :
Ad= [y (b +z y )
(2 − 3)𝑉𝑑 = 1: 1.5𝑚/𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑉𝑠𝑦 {
1: 1.5 𝑚/𝑠𝑒𝑐
Take Vsy= 1.35 m / sec
𝛱(𝐷2 )
8.89 =
4
D=3.4m
- 162 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
8.89
A of one pipe = = 4.45 m2
2
D= 2.40 m
d = 0.5 m ok
𝛱(2.4)2
Asy actual =2 * = 9.05 m2
4
Heading up :
0.4
𝑡𝑎𝑛 ө =
17.625
ө = 1.30
ө
= 0.650
2
- 163 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
𝑉𝑠𝑦 2
HL = { ken + 2kb + kf +kex }
2𝑔
Kex = 0.7
Kf = f * (L/d )
Take f = 0.013
L = 25*2= 50 m
=11.5 cm < 20 ok
Structural Design :
h = 1.26
- 164 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Loading
1 𝛱 1
* [(2.42)2 – ( 2.4)2]* 7.8* [ take pipe thickness = 1.0cm ]
2 4 2.4
= 0.123 t/m'
2- For live load :
- 165 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
e1=kƔsh1
1
= * 1.6 * 3.13 = 1.7 t /m2
3
e2= k Ɣsub * h2
1
= * 1.0 * 3.6 * =1.2 t/m2
3
e3= Ɣw hw
e4 =k p1
1
= * 1.0 = 0.33 t/m 2
3
1.2+0.4 3.6+1.2
Ʃ e = 1.7 + + + 0.33 = 5.23 t/m'
2 2
- 166 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
Pint = Ɣw*y
𝑤𝑑 7.63∗2.4
N= = = 9.156 ton
2 2
𝑁 𝑀
fmax= - ∓
𝑀 𝑧
− 91.56 5100
= - ≤ 1200 kg / cm2
𝑡 𝑡2
Take t = 2.2 cm
Pint* d = 2 T
1.41 * 2.4 = 2T
T = 1.692 ton
𝑇 1.692∗ 103
F= = = 7.72 kg / cm2< 1200 ⇾ ok
𝐴 100∗2.2
- 167 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
𝛱
= [(2.444)2 – ( 2.4)2] * 50 = 8.73 m3
4
W = Ɣsteel * V
Take t = 35 cm
e Mult 1.3∗105
K = 2
= = .0058
𝑡 𝑓𝑐𝑢∗𝑏∗𝑡 250∗100∗352
ρ = 1.0
use 7 ϕ 12 /m'
- 168 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
𝛱
= [(2.75)2 – ( 2.4)2] * 50 = 70.8 m3
4
Cost of one unit (pound) 6500 for one ton 1600 for one m3
- 169 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
1. Exercise (3-1)
It's required to design a crossing structure where a drain intersect the way of a
main canal, Maximum discharge is 15 m3 / sec and Maximum allowable Heading
up = 20 cm.
Drain dada:
Bed level (10.00) , Bed width = 10.0 m
Water level (12.40) , Berm level = (14.65)
Side slopes are 1:1 & 3:2
Bank level (16.40) , Bank width = 7.0 m
Canal data:
Bed level (12.40) , Bed width = 8.0 m
Water level (14.40) , Berm level = (14.65)
Side slopes are 3:2 & 2:1
Bank level (15.40) , Bank width = 7.0 m
Soil data:
Ɣsoil = 1.65 t/m3 , ϕ = 25 0
It is required to make:
1- Complete Hydraulic Design
2- Complete Structural Design as steel pipe and R.Cpipe
3- Draw to scale 1:100
a- Plan (H . E .R)
b- Sec Elevation
c- Side .View .
It's required also to make comparison between the cost of the steel pipe and
the R.C pipe
- 170 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
2. For the intersection between the canal and the drain with a given data below,
it is required to
Canal data
Bed width= 12.0 m, bed level= (11.50) m+MSL
Water level= (13.90), berm level = (14.5)
Bank level = (16.00), bank width = 10.0 m
Berm width = 6.0 m, max. discharge = 25 m3/s
Side slopes from bed to berm =3:2, from berm to road = 2:1,
Drain data
Bed width = 7.0 m, bed level= (10.00) m+MSL
Water level= (11.65), berm level = (14.00)
Bank level = (15.00), bank width = 8.0 m
Berm width = 5.0 m, max., discharge = 7.80 m3/s
Side slopes from bed to berm =3:2, from berm to road = 2:1
Soil data:
γsoil=1.70 t/m3, ϕ= 30o, allowable bearing capacity = 1.35 kg/cm2
- 171 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (3) Syphon
3. For the intersection between the canal and the drain with the following field
data.
- 172 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Aqueduct
1. Introduction
- 173 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
- 174 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Level crossing
Level crossing facilities are provided when both the drain and the canalrun at more
or less the same level.
2. Shapes of aqueduct:
- 175 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
3. Uses of Aqueduct
- 176 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
- 177 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
- 178 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
- 179 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
1. 2 culvert parts.
2. 1 aqueduct part in the middle of the Structure.
Figure (4.8): Structure system for aqueduct part (Double over hanged beam)
- 180 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Continue figure (4.8): Structure system for aqueduct part (Continues beam)
- 181 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Choose wing walls at inlet and exit to find 𝑘𝑒𝑛 and 𝑘𝑒𝑥 according to the wing
wall.
Find the rack coefficient 𝑘𝑟 .
Find 𝑘𝑓 for the total aqueduct length.
Find ℎ𝑙 ≤ 20 𝑐𝑚 .
𝑉𝑢.𝑠 2 𝑉𝑎𝑞 2
ℎ𝑙 =𝑘𝑟 + (𝑘𝑒𝑛 + 𝑘𝑒𝑥 + 𝑘𝑓 )
2𝑔 2𝑔
Continuousbeam.
Simple beam with over hanging ends.
- 182 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
𝑀− =𝑀+
−
W𝐿1 2
𝑀 =
2
+
𝑊𝐿2 W𝐿1 2
𝑀 = −
8 2
𝐿
∴ 𝐿1 =
√8
7. Loads on aqueduct
- 183 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
𝜋𝑑12
(𝑤𝑤 ) = × 𝛾𝑤 ×1 t/𝑚`
4
∴ W = 𝑤𝑤 + g
𝜋(𝑑0 4 − d1 4 )
𝐼=
64
𝑑0
Y=
2
Figure (4.12): Uplift pressure acting on the lower cord of the pipe of length L’
- 184 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Where,
d: pipe diameter.
𝜃 𝑟 : The angle in radian.
𝛾𝑤 : Specific weight of water.
U: uplift force.
- 185 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Steel Hope
𝑄 = 𝑈⁄2
𝑄 𝑄 ⁄2
𝑞𝑠ℎ = 𝑞𝑠ℎ =
𝑡×𝑏 𝑡×𝑥
Where:
x: the distance measured from bolt head and the edge of the steel hope .
- 186 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
𝜑 : Bolt diameter.
One should check the force transferred from bolts to the support through the
submerged weight of the concrete part
Where:
W: Is the submerged weight of the shaded areas of concrete support + weight of empty
pipe of half-length between supports.
- 187 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Figure (4.17): Cross sections at upstream, through the aqueduct, and downstream
- 188 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Heading up is known as head loss between upstream and downstream of the hydraulic
structure.
= ℎ3 + ℎ2 − ℎ1
𝑉2 2 −𝑉𝑢𝑠 2
ℎ3 = (1+𝐾𝑒𝑛 )
2𝑔
𝑉1 2 −𝑉𝑑𝑠 2
ℎ1 = (1−𝐾𝑒𝑥 )
2𝑔
By applying specific energy equation between sec 2-2 and the upstreamone can find:-
𝑉𝑢𝑠 2 𝑉2 2
𝑦𝑢𝑠 + =𝑦2 + + ℎ𝑙(𝑢−2)
2𝑔 2𝑔
𝑉2 2 𝑉𝑢𝑠 2
𝑦𝑢𝑠 − 𝑦2 = − + ℎ𝑙
2𝑔 2𝑔
- 189 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
𝑉2 2 −𝑉𝑢𝑠 2 𝑉2 2 −𝑉𝑢𝑠 2
𝑦𝑢𝑠 − 𝑦2 = + 𝐾𝑒𝑛
2𝑔 2𝑔
𝑉2 2 −𝑉𝑢𝑠 2
ℎ3 = (1+𝐾𝑒𝑛 )
2𝑔
By applying specific energy equation between sec 1-1 and downstreamone can find:-
𝑉1 2 −𝑉𝑑𝑠 2
ℎ1 = (1−𝐾𝑒𝑥 )
2𝑔
Ken is the coefficient of the head loss due to wing walls at entrance,
Kexis the coefficient of the head loss due to wing walls at exit,
It is known that the downstream water level is given data so that one should calculate
the values of head loss from downstream to upstream direction as follow :-
2. Calculate the value of the velocity at section 1-1 according to the calculated
value of y1, discharge and the width :
Vd.s =Qmax/Ad.s
- 190 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Repeat the previous until the calculated value of h1 equals to the assumed one
then the calculation should be stopped.
yav = (y1+y2) / 2, y2 = y1+ h2, and the energy slop SE = h2 / L where L is the
aqueduct length .
Repeat the previous equation till the calculated value of ''h2'' from the above
Manning equation equals to the assumed value of ''h2''at first, the value of y2is
known.
- 191 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Vu.s =Qmax/Au.s
Repeat the previous until the calculated value of h3 equals to the assumed one
then the calculation should be stopped.
Finally; heading h= h3+ h2 –h1must not more than the allowable given value
- 192 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Thickness assumption
S =1.05B
𝑆
t=6−8 ≥ 20𝑐𝑚
Load:
Live load = 0.5 to 1.0𝑡𝑚2 Figure (4.19): Empirical dimensions of the aqueduct
𝑤𝑠 2
M= L.L
8
𝑀
d= 𝑐1 √𝑓
𝑐𝑢 𝐵
𝑀𝑢
𝐴𝑠 = 2
𝛽𝑐𝑟 𝑓𝑦 𝑗 𝑑 M= W*S
8
𝐴𝑠` = Loads
Figure (4.20): 0.25 𝐴and
𝑠 bending moment on the upper slab
- 193 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
The lower slab deign as fixed supported slab from the two sides with the following:-
Thickness assumption
S =B + b
Load:
ℎ3
M` = 𝛾𝑤 ×
6
ℎ
N = 𝛾𝑤 × ℎ ×
2
ℎ2
N = 𝛾𝑤 × (tension)
2
**** Calculate the reinforcement taken into consideration the 3category and water
section consequently crack control must be spotted in the design
- 194 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
ℎ3
M = 𝛾𝑤 ×
6
Design the section according to the type of eccentricity (Big or Small) as mention
before
The aqueduct walls may be considered as simply supported beam with two
overhanging beam or continuous beam depending on:-
- 195 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
1
W= (o.w of aqueduct + weight of water)
2
𝑤𝑎2
𝑀− =
2
+
𝑤𝑙 2 𝑤𝑎2
= − Figure (4.23): loads on the main beam in the long direction
𝑀 8 2
It is known that, the aqueduct wall in the longitudinal direction designed as deep
beam due to the ratio of the depth of the beam to the effective length as following.
14.4 Design of walls as a deep beam
1-simple beam
Simply supported deep beams are defined as Beams that are deeper than the effective
𝑑
length by (0.8) ≥ 0.8
𝐿
- 196 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
0.86𝑙
𝑦𝑐𝑡= 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 {
0.87𝑑
𝑀𝑢.𝑙
→ 𝑇𝑢𝑙 =
𝑦𝑐𝑡
𝑇𝑢.𝑙. 1.1
→ 𝐴𝑠 = > 𝑏𝑑
𝛽𝑐𝑟 . (𝐹𝑦 ⁄𝑦𝑠 ) 𝑓𝑦
1.1
𝑖𝑓 𝐴𝑠 < 𝑏𝑑 → 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝐴𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑓𝑦
1.1
𝑏𝑑
𝑓𝑦
𝐴𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 1.3𝐴𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑞
0.15
{ 100 𝑏𝑑
- 197 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Figure (4.26): Reinforcement details for simply supported deep beam carrying vertical loads
** There is very important note as shown in El-behairy figure in case of loads hung at
the bottom, vertical reinforcements carrying the full reaction are to be introduced for
the full height over a length 0.7 L.
- 198 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
2- continuous beam
Continuous deep beams are defined as Beams that are deeper than the effective length
𝑑
by (0.4) ≥ 0.4
𝐿
- 199 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
0.43𝑙
𝑦𝑐𝑡= 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 { (At supports)
0.87𝑑
𝑀2
→ 𝑇𝑢.𝑙. =
𝑦𝑐𝑡
𝑇𝑢.𝑙. 1.1
→ 𝐴𝑠 = > 𝑏𝑑
𝛽𝑐𝑟 . (𝐹𝑦 ⁄𝑦𝑠 ) 𝑓𝑦
1.1
𝑖𝑓 𝐴𝑠 < 𝑏𝑑 → 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝐴𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑓𝑦
1.1
𝑏𝑑
𝑓𝑦
𝐴𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 1.3𝐴𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑞
0.15
{ 100 𝑏𝑑
** It is recommended to extend the full amount of the tension steel at the middle of the
spans to the supports.
** half the tension steel required at the center lines of the supports must be arranged
over the full length of the adjoining spans and the other half to be extended to a
distance equal to 0.3L on each side of the center line of the support
- 200 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
- 202 -
R.C AQUEDUCT
Chapter (4) Aqueduct
(11.50)
(11.50) A (11.50) (10.65)
1:10 (10.65) B
(10.50) (10.10)
(10.10)
(8.30) 60
SEC. A-A
0.30
(7.75)
A 3:2 main drein B (10.10)
6pilesDi 0.48 m
SEC. ELEVATION (4.45)
pile cap (8.30)
.70 *1.4 m
SEC. B-B
- 203 -
(10.00) (8.30)
(11.50) Bank level
3:2
(4.45) SEC. C-C
Design of Irrigation Structures
2:1
2:1
1:10
1:10 (11.00)
(10.50)
1:1 Berm level
(8.30)
(10.65)
Dimention of pile cap
C C PLAN (H. E. R)
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Concept:
By reducing the internal forces in a structure, the structure becomes stiffer.
A major design factor with aqueducts is seepage, causing structural damage and loss of
flow. For this particular project economy was also a major design issue, due to the economy
of post-civil war Spain. Torroja’s task was to design a structure that satisfied the economical
constraints and was as efficient as possible. Torroja designed a simple structure as seen in
Figureabove. It involves post-tensioned, u-shaped, concrete channels supported by two-
pronged forks. The span between successive supports was 62 feet or just under 20m. The
design incorporates the two main design factors with these supports.
- 204 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
As can be seen in figure (4-32) the aqueduct was constructed in sections 124 feet long or
just over 37m. The two supports are arranged so that in essence each section is a simply
supported beam with two overhangs at eachend, each half the simply supported beam span,
essentially an overhang :span : overhang ratio of 1:2:1. This decreases the bending moment
in the viaduct, hence making it stiffer and less material is needed. This can be proved for any
equally distributed load as with a steady flow in an aqueduct:
- 205 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
This aids the structure in two ways. The channels are in tension over their entire length. This
suits the design as each channel section has post-tensioned steel cables running through the
top edge ofthe channel, as seen in Figure 4. This is where the tension in the channel is
highest. Seepage inconcrete viaducts is usually caused by tension cracks in the bottom of the
viaduct. If there is notension in the bottom of the channel, seepage is more unlikely.If the
maximum bending moment lies over the support thismeans the reinforcement can be
increased over the supportand decreased in the centre span. Torroja used 4
posttensionedcables over the supports and 2 in the centre span,using less steel.The self
balancing overhangs cause the viaduct to be stifferand more efficient in its function and as a
structure. Torrojareports no seepage occurred over the entire length of theviaduct. The
deflections of the spans, potentially damaging togravity driven water flow, are rendered
negligible by theoverhangs.
- 206 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
16. Example
Discharge = 60 m3 / sec .
Discharge = 3 m3 / sec .
It 's required to :
- 207 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Solution
According to levels :
*Bed level of Branch canal is higher than water level in main drain
*According to discharge :
Hydraulic design :
Q = 3 m3/s
A = by+ zy2
= 7.13m2
- 208 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
𝑄 3
V= =
𝐴 7.13
= 0.42 m / sec.
(3 − 2) 0.84 − 1.26
Vstruct = { 𝑣 = { m/ sec.
1 − 1.5 𝑐 1 − 1.50
Take v = 1.15 m / sec .
𝑄
A of aqueduct =
𝑣𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑛
3
=
1.15
= 2.61 m2
2.61
Bstruct = = 1.73 m
1.50
𝑩𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒄𝒕=𝟏.𝟕𝟎 𝒎
Calculation of h1:
𝑣1 2 −𝑣𝑑.𝑠 2
h1 = (1-kex.) *
2𝑔
- 209 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
y1 =yd.s- h1
y1 = 1.50 – h1
Assume h1 = 1 cm and then check that h1(assumed) equal to h1 that calculated or not.
h 1 assumed V1
y1 (m) h 1calc.
(m) m/ sec.
0.01 1.49 1.1844 0.0188
0.0188 1.412 1.1914 0.0190
0.0190 1.481 1.1916 0.0190
h1= 1.90 cm
y1= 1.481 m
Calculation of h2:
𝑄 1 𝐴 2⁄ ℎ 1⁄
= *( ) 3 * ( 2) 2
𝐴 𝑛 𝑝 𝐿
𝑄2 𝑝 4⁄
h2= n2 * *( ) 3 *L
𝐴2 𝐴
𝑄2 𝐵+2𝑦𝑎𝑣𝑔. 4/3
h2= n2* 2 * ( ) *L
(𝐵∗𝑦𝑎𝑣𝑔 ) 𝐵∗𝑦𝑎𝑣𝑔
𝑦1+𝑦2
yavg. =
2
- 210 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
yavg =y2
32 1.7+2𝑦𝑎𝑣𝑔. 4⁄
h2 = 0.0142 * * ( ) 3 * 72.60
(1.7∗𝑦(𝑎𝑣𝑔.))2 1.7∗ 𝑦𝑎𝑣𝑔.
y2 = 1.525 m
Calculation of (h3)
𝑣2 2 −𝑣𝑢.𝑠 2
h3 = (1+ken ) *
2𝑔
𝑄 3
V2 = =
𝐴2 𝐵.𝑦2
3
V2 =
1.70∗1.525
V2 =1.157 m/sec .
𝑄 𝑄
Vu.s = =
𝐴𝑢.𝑠 𝑏𝑦𝑢.𝑠+𝑧𝑦2
𝑢.𝑠
3
=
2.5𝑦𝑢.𝑠+1.5𝑦
𝑢.𝑠2
- 211 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
yu.s= 1.6044 m
hl =yu.s- yd.s
= 1.6044-1.50
= 0.1044 m
hl= 10.44 cm
Take ts = 25 cm
Loads
=0.805 t /m'
L .L =0.5 t/m'
= 0.805 +0.5
= 1.305 t /m'
𝑤𝑙 2 1.305∗1.792
M=
8 8
- 212 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
= 0.52 t /m'
0.78𝑥105
D = c1 = √ C1= 12.46 J= 0.826
250 𝑥 100
𝑀 0.78 𝑥 105
As = = = 1.4 cm2 /m2
𝐵𝑐𝑟𝑓𝑦.𝐽 .𝑑 0.85∗3600𝑥 0.826∗22
0.15
Asmin = x100 *22 = 3.3 cm2 /m' Use 6 Ø 12/m
100
W = t sγc+ γwhw
= 2.25 t / m'
2.25∗1.792
MT= MΠ-Π = 0.563
8
= 0.338 t 'm/m'
NI-I=W.L/2=1.5*1.5/2
NI-I=1.13 ton
𝑤∗𝑙
NII-II= + o.wt of wall
2
2.25𝑥 1.79
= + 0.30*2*2.50
2
= 3.51 ton
- 213 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Design of sections
Sec. I-I
Stage I
𝑀 𝑥105
T=√ + 4 cm
𝑏𝑥𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
0.563 𝑥105
=√ +4
100∗3
= 17.7 cm
t = 30 cm
𝑇 𝑀
ft = +
𝐴 𝑧
Stage II
𝑀 0.563
E= =
𝑁 1.13
0.3
= 0.5 - + 0.03
2
= 0.38 m
Ms= Tu* es
= 0.64 t .m
- 214 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
𝑀𝑢 0.64𝑥105
d =c1√ 27 = C1√ C1 = 16.88J = 0.826
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 𝑏 250 𝑥 100
1 𝑀𝑢 𝑇𝑢.𝑙
As = [ + ]
𝐵𝑐𝑟 𝐹𝑦.𝑑.𝑑 𝑓𝑦/Ɣ𝑠
1 0.64𝑥105 1.5∗1.13𝑥105
= [ + ]
0.85 3600∗0.826∗27 3600/1.15
Sec.II-II
M = 0.563 , N = 3.51 t
𝑇 𝑀
Ft = +
𝐴 𝑧
𝑡
= 0.16 < – cover big ecc.
2
𝑡
es = e - + cover
2
0.3
= 0.16 - + 0.03
2
= 0.04
M s= Tu. * es
= 0.21
1 𝑀𝑢 𝑇𝑢𝑙 1 0.21𝑥105 3.51𝑥 1.50 x
As = [ + ] = [ + ] 103
𝐵𝑐𝑟 𝐹𝑦.𝐽.𝑑 𝑓𝑦/Ɣ𝑠 0.85 3600𝑥0.826∗27 3600/1.15
- 215 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Dead load
D.L=o.et+0.5*(Wupperslab+Wlower slab)*S+0.50*water weight
1 1.7
D.L = 0.3 *2.3* 2.50 +2 [0.3*1.70*2.5*+0.25x1.70*2.50+0.1x1.80*2.3]+1*1.50* 2
D.L=4.38 t /m'
2.3
L.L =0.50*
2
L1 = 0.35 L2
2x0.35 L2 + L2 = 46 m
L2 = 27.05 m
Take L2 = 27 m L1 = 9.50
m
𝐿21
MI = T.L *
2
- 216 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
9.82
= 4.96* = 223.82 m.t
2
= 253.88 m.t
𝑀𝑢
d = C1√
𝑓𝑤 𝑏
223.82𝑥105 𝑥1.50
220 = C1√
250𝑥30
𝑀
d = c1√ 𝑢
𝑓 𝑏 𝑤
253.88𝑥105 𝑥1.50
220 = C1√
250𝑥30
C1 = 3.087 , J = 0.75
𝑀𝑢 253.88𝑥1.50𝑥105
As = =
𝛽𝑐𝑟 ∗𝐹𝑦 ∗𝑗∗𝑑 0.60∗3600∗0.75∗220
- 217 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (4) Aqueduct
Exercise (4-1)
It's required to construct an aqueduct to pass the discharge of the canal across
the drain:
Canal data:
Bed width=2.30m ; bed level= (2.15) ; water surface level = (3.95) ; berm level
=(4.50); bank level = (5.50) and land level=(3.00) ,side slopes 3:2 from bed to
berm and 2:1 from berm to bank, Q= 5.4 m3/s.
Drain data:
Bed width=2.0m ; bed level= (00.00) ; water surface level = (1.50) ; berm level
=(3.00) ; bank level = (4.50) and land level=(3.00) ,side slopes 3:2 from bed to
berm and 2:1 from berm to bank.
Live load is 60.0 ton lorry , specific weight of soil = 1.65 t/m3.
Two alternative solutions are required (pipe aqueduct and R.C aqueduct).
- 218 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
Escapes
1. Definition
Irrigation canals are designed and operated to provide water requirements for their
command areas at all times, i.e.
QS = DDesign
For QS (pass discharge) less than QD = water level decrease (shortage of water).
For QS more than QD= water level increase
If number of water users may shut down after a rain and an overload may result further
downstream with surplus of water level. Excess canal discharge, which have to be diverted
Hence, escapes are constructed to the following two main functions:
Figure (5.1): Spill the excess water to the nearest drain by a structure called escape
or spillway
2. TYPES OF ESCAPES
- 219 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
(Tail escape at the end of the canal or intermediate escape added to a syphon or aqueduct at
the crossing of a canal with a drain)
- 220 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
- 221 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
3. Tail escape
Tail escape is a structure constructed at the end of a waterway to evacuate the water to a
water body.
Tail escape consists of a well where its crest level at the high water level. It is also equipped
with an orifice at its bottom to evacuate all the water in 24 hrs. if necessary.
All branch canals must be protected by escapes at the dead end of the canal
- 222 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
2- Required
Design of weir (To escape surplus discharge )
Design of orifice (to empty canal )
Design of drainage pipe
Complete drawing
1. Plan H. E. R
2. Sec Elev .
3. Side view
- 223 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
Crest level of the weir should above the higher water level (HWL) by 10 cm
Water level of canal does not exceed 15 cm above the crest level
Berm Level = crest level + 0.25 m
h is the water height above the weir crest ≈ 0.15 m
- 224 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
1
Vc Qc / Ac Vc R 2 / 3 S 1 / 2
, n
Get D???? ≮1.0 m
T2
h
T1
1
Z:
1 d Z:
Conclusions :
Vc= Qc/Ac = ✓
1
Vc=𝑛 . R2/3 . S1/2 =✓
a)circular weir
3
B = 4 Ӆ Dcl Dcl =✓
DIn = D c. l -0.5 cm
Figure (5.10): circular weir
Dex = Dc.l+0.5 cm
Rectangular ( 3 acting side )
B= 2b1+b2
Rectangular (2 acting side )
B = 2 b1
- 225 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
2(𝑙.𝑏𝑒 .𝑑 )
T = L= (2-6) km
𝑐𝑑.𝑎.√2𝑔𝑑
T= 18 → 24 hrs. Cd=0.60
𝛱𝑑𝑜 2
a= do =✓
4 S.S=1:1 be=b+d
S.S=3:2 be=b+1.5*d
3.1.3 Design of Drainage pipe
D
1:1 1:1
π/2
(D/5+0.30)m
P.C.
X
D
(D+0.30)m
Sec X-X
- 226 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
Qp = Qw+ Qo
Qo is the discharge through the orifice (m3/s)
lp
2nd trial
Start with new h2, Qo C d .a o . 2 g (ho h2 )
Get new dp, and check the two conditions. Get new h1 and use it to calculate h2
3rd trial
Repeat to obtain more accurate value of h1 using the value of h2 from the pre-
trail.
- 227 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
Conclusions
Qp = Qw+Qo
Qw= as before
Qo =✓
Qp=Qw+Qo = ✓
𝑣𝑝2 𝐿𝑝
hL= [ 1.5 + 4.f. 𝑑𝑝 ] =
2𝑔
h1/dp ≮ 0.2
ΔH ≮ 0.5 m
- 228 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
- 229 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
- 230 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
- 231 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
4. Solved example
Design a tail escape for the channel to escape the last reach of length 6.0 km witch velocity
0.45 m/sec through 24 hours according to the following Data:
Required
1- Dimension of weir
2- Dimension of orifice
3- Dimension of drainage pipe
1-Dimensions of weir
- 232 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
2-Dimension of orifice
2.𝐿.𝑏𝑒.𝑑
T=
𝑐𝑑.𝑎.√2𝑔𝑑
2𝑥6𝑥1000𝑥4.8𝑥1.8
24x60x60= 0.6𝑥9𝑥√2𝑥9.8𝑥1.8
𝛱𝑑𝑜 2
a= 0.337 m2 = 4
do = 0.65 m
...take do = 60 cm (available)
= 70 cm
...aact = 0.33 m2
Qp = Qw+ Qo
Qo = cd.ao.√2𝑔(ℎ𝑜 − ℎ2)
0.65
Ho=1.8+0.5+0.25 - = 2.22 m
2
- 233 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
1.86
Assume vp = 2.5 m / sec Ap = = 0.744 m2
2.5
𝛱𝑑𝑝2
Ap= ... dp = 0.97 m take dp = 1.0 m
𝑙1
𝛱𝑥12
Ap= = 0.785 ... vp = 1.86 ÷ 0.785 = 2.37 m / sec
4
𝑣𝑝2 𝑙𝑝 2.372 20
Hl= [ 1.5+4. F. 𝑑𝑝] = 2𝑥9.8 [ 1.5 +4 x0.01 x ] = 0.66
2𝑔 1
Check
- 234 -
Design of Irrigation Structures Chapter (5) Escapes
Exercise (5-1)
Design a tail escape for a canal to escape the last reach of length
1.0km with slope 10 cm/km through 24hrs according to the following
data:-
Canal data:-
Bed width =1.25m , bed level =(6.10),
water level =(7.00), berm level =(7.60),
bank level=(8.25) bank width =6.0m
S.S from bed to berm are 1:1, and from berm to bank 3:2
Drain data:-
H.W.L = (5.50), bed level=(4.50),
Berm level=(7.60), bank level=(8.25)
S.S from bed to berm are 1:1and from berm to bank 3:2
It is required to:
- Give all necessary hydraulic calculations.
- Structural design of the drainage pipe.
- Draw to scale 1:100
a- Plan (H.E.R)
b- SEC. ELEV.
c- Side view.
- 235 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Retaining Walls
Introduction
The early engineers in the ancient cultures of Egypt, Greece, Rome and the Mayans were built
retaining walls by trial-and-error what worked and what didn't We marvel at their achievements.
Even the most casual observer looks in wonder at the magnificent structures they created and have
stood for thousands of years – including countless retaining walls. With great skill they cut, shaped,
and set stone with such precision that the joints were paper thin. Reinforced concrete would not be
developed for a thousand years, but they used what they had, and learned how to do it better with
each succeeding structure. Consider the Great Wall of China, for example, where transverse bamboo
poles were used to tie the walls together – a forerunner of today’s “mechanically stabilized earth”.
Major advances in understanding how retaining walls work and how soil generates forces against
walls appeared in the 18th and 19th centuries with the work of French engineer Charles Coulomb
1776, who is better remembered for his work on electricity, and later by William Rankine in 1857.
Today, their equations are familiar to most civil engineers. A significant body of work was the
introduction of soil mechanics as a science through the pioneering work of Karl Terrzaghi in the
1920s.
Indeed, the design of retaining structures has advanced dramatically in recent decades giving us new
design concepts, a better understanding of soil behavior, and hopefully safer and more economical
designs. (Basics Of Retaining Wall Design 10 th Edition A Design Guide for Earth Retaining
structures, Publishing Since 1992, Newport Beach, California, www.hbap.com).
Definition:
Retaining walls are used to provide lateral resistance for a mass of earth or other material to
accommodate a transportation facility. These walls are used in a variety of applications including
right-of-way restrictions, protection of existing structures that must remain in place, grade
separations, new highway embankment construction, roadway widening, stabilization of slopes,
protection of environmentally sensitive areas, staging, and temporary support including excavation or
underwater construction support, etc.
A retaining wall is any constructed wall that restrains soil or other material at locations
having an abrupt change in elevation.
A retaining wall is defined as a structure whose primary purpose is to provide lateral support
for soil or rock. In some cases, the retaining wall may also support vertical loads. Examples
include basement walls and certain types of bridge abutments.
- 236 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
This type of wall depends upon the dead load mass of the wall for stability. In other words
gravity retaining wall, which relies on the mass of the structure to resist over turning (h <3 m) where
h, is the retaining wall height.
- 237 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
This type of wall depends upon the dead load mass of the wall for stability and a minimum amount of
reinforcement to resist tension stresses.
These walls which retain earth by a wall cantilevering up from a footing are the most common type
of retaining walls in use today. Cantilever retaining wall relies on the bending strength of the
cantilever slab above the base (3 < h < 5m). Cantilever retaining walls are generally made of reinforced
concrete.
- 238 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 239 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
A gabion wall is a type of gravity wall whereby stones or rubble are placed within wire fabric
baskets. Crib walls are a variation of the gabion method whereby mostly steel bins are filled with
stone or rubble. Another variation is to stack a grillage of timbers and fill the interior with earth or
rubble.
- 240 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 241 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
9. Bridge abutments
These support the end of a bridge and retain the earth embankment leading to the bridge. Bridge
abutments usually have angled wing walls of descending height to accommodate the side slope of the
embankment.
- 242 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
These are generally waterfront structures such as at docks, but steel sheet piling is also used for
temporary shoring on construction sites. Steel sheet units configured for stiffness or concrete panels
are driven into the soil to provide lateral support below the base of the excavation or the dredge line.
Also, it is called “basement walls” (for residential and light commercial conditions) or “top tie-back”
walls. These walls are distinguished by having lateral support at or near the top, thereby with less or
no dependence for fixity at the foundation. Technically, these walls are classified as “none yielding”
walls because the walls cannot move laterally at the top, as opposed to cantilevered (yielding)
walls. Such walls are usually designed as “pin connected” both at the top and bottom.
The earth pressure creates a positive moment in the wall, which requires reinforcing on the front of
the wall, that is, the side opposite the retained soil. . In some cases it may be cost effective to fix the
base of the wall to the footing to reduce both the bending in the wall and restraining force required at
the top support.
Footings for these walls are usually designed for vertical loads only. However, it is often desirable to
design the lower portion of a basement wall as a cantilevered retaining wall with fixity at the footing
so that backfill can be safely placed to avoid bracing the wall, or waiting until the lateral restraint at
the top is in place, such as a floor diaphragm. Note that conventional wood floors framed into the top
of a basement wall may not provide a sufficient stiffness to allow for the restrained case.
- 243 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Anchors or tiebacks are often used for higher walls where a cantilevered wall may not be
economical. Restraint is achieved by drilling holes and grouting inclined steel rods as anchors into
the zone of earth behind the wall beyond the theoretical failure plane in the backfill. The anchors can
be placed at several tiers for higher walls, and can be post-tensioned rods grouted into drilled holes,
or non-tensioned rods grouted into the drilled holes. The latter are also known as soil nails.
- 244 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 245 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
1. Project Category
The designer should consider if the wall system is permanent or temporary.
Cut Walls
Cut walls are generally constructed from the top down and used for both temporary and permanent
applications. Cantilever sheet pile walls are suitable for shallower cuts. If a deeper cut is required to
be retained, a key question is to determine the availability of right of- way (ROW). Subsurface
conditions such as shallow bedrock also enter into considerations of cut walls. Anchored walls, soil
nail walls, and anchored soldier pile walls may be suitable for deeper cuts although these walls
require either a larger permanent easement or permanent ROW.
Fill walls
Walls constructed in fill locations are typically used for permanent construction and may require
large ROW to meet the base width requirements. The necessary fill material may be required to be
granular in nature. These walls use bottom up construction and have typical cost effective ranges.
Surface conditions must also be considered. For instance, if soft compressible soils are present, walls
that can tolerate larger settlements and movements must be considered. MSE (mechanical stabilize
earth) walls are generally more economical for fill locations than CIP (cast in place) cantilever
walls.
- 246 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Cut/fill Walls
CIP cantilever and prefabricated modular walls are most suitable in cut/fill situations as the walls are
built from bottom up, have narrower base widths and these walls do not rely on soil reinforcement
techniques to provide stability. These types of walls are suitable for both cut or fill situations.
3. Site Characteristics
Site characterization should be performed, as appropriate, to provide the necessary information for
the design and construction of retaining wall systems. The objective of this characterization is to
determine composition and subsurface soil/rock conditions define engineering properties of
foundation material and retained soils, establish groundwater conditions, determine the corrosion
potential of the water, and identify any discontinuities or geotechnical issues such as poor bearing
capacity, large settlement potential, and/or any other design and construction problems. Site
characterization mainly includes subsurface investigations and analyses.
7. Aesthetics
In addition to being functional and economical, the walls should be aesthetically pleasing. Wall
aesthetics may influence selection of a particular wall system. However, the aesthetic treatment
should complement the retaining wall and not disrupt the functionality or selection of wall type. All
permanent walls should be designed with due considerations to the wall aesthetics. Each wall site
must be investigated individually for aesthetic needs.
8. Constructability Considerations
Availability of construction material, site accessibility, equipment availability, form work and
temporary shoring, dewatering requirements, labor considerations, complicated alignment changes,
- 247 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
9. Environmental Considerations
Selection of a retaining wall system is influenced by its potential environmental impact during and
after construction. Some of the environmental concerns during construction may include excavation
and disposal of contaminated material at the project site, large quantity of water, corrosive nature of
water, vibration impacts, noise abatement and pile driving constraints.
10. Cost
Cost of a retaining wall system is influenced by many factors that must be considered while
estimating preliminary costs. The components that influence cost include excavation, structure,
procurement of additional easement or ROW, drainage, disposal of unsuitable material, traffic
maintenance etc. Maintenance cost also affects overall cost of a retaining wall system. The retaining
walls that have least structural cost may not be the most economical walls. Wall selection should be
based on overall cost. When feasible, MSE Walls and modular block gravity walls cost less than
other walls
13. Railing
For safety reasons most walls will require a protective railing. The railing will usually be located
behind the wall. The roadway designer will generally determine whether a pedestrian or non-
pedestrian railing is required and what aesthetic considerations are needed.
- 248 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Important definitions
Backfill: The soil placed behind a wall.
Backfill slope: Often the backfill slopes upward from the back face of the wall. The slope is
usually expressed as a ratio of horizontal to vertical (e.g. 2:1).
Batter: The slope of the face of the stem from a vertical plane, usually on the inside (earth)
face.
Dowels: Reinforcing steel placed in the footing and bent up into the stem a distance at least
equal to the required development length.
Footing (or foundation): That part of the structure below the stem that supports and
transmits vertical and horizontal forces into the soil below.
Footing key: A deepened portion of the footing to provide greater sliding resistance.
Grade: The surface of the soil or paving; can refer to either side of the wall.
Heel: That portion of the footing extending behind the wall (under the retained soil).
Horizontal temperature/shrinkage reinforcing: Longitudinal horizontal reinforcing usually
placed in both faces of the stem and used primarily to control cracking from shrinkage or
temperature changes.
Keyway: A horizontal slot located at the base of the stem and cast into the footing for greater
shear resistance.
Principal reinforcing: Reinforcing used to resist bending in the stem.
Retained height: The height of the earth to be retained, generally measured upward from the
top of the footing.
Stem: The vertical wall above the foundation.
Surcharge: Any load placed in or on top of the soil, either in front or behind the wall.
Toe: That portion of footing which extends in front of the front face of the stem (away from
the retained earth).
Weep holes: Holes provided at the base of the stem for drainage. Weep holes usually have
gravel or crushed rock behind the openings to act as a sieve and prevent clogging. Poor
drainage of weep holes is the result of weep holes becoming clogged with weeds, thereby
increasing the lateral pressure against the wall. Unless properly designed and maintained,
weep holes seldom “weep”. Alternatively, perforated pipe surrounded with gravel and
encased within a geotextile can be used to provide drainage of the backfill.
- 249 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 250 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
and on the opposite side of the retained section of fill. Some engineers might use the passive
pressure that develops along this buried face as additional restraint to lateral movement, but often it
is ignored.
In order to develop the full active pressure or the full passive pressure, the wall must move. If the
wall does not move a sufficient amount, then the full active or full passive pressure will not develop.
If the full active pressure does not develop, then the pressure will be higher than the expected active
pressure. Likewise, significant movement is necessary to mobilize the full passive pressure.
Stability Requirements
The modes of failure of retaining wall are as follow:
1. Sliding
2. Over Turning
3. Bearing capacity failure of the supporting soil.
4. Deep seated shear failure, which may occurs if there is a week soil layer below the foundation
within depth of about 1.5 times foundation width.
- 251 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
The Primary Concerns for the Design of Nearly any Retaining Wall are:
1. That it has an acceptable Factor of Safety with respect to sliding.
2. That it has an acceptable Factor of Safety with respect to overturning.
3. That the allowable soil bearing pressures are not exceeded.
4. That the stresses within the components (stem and footing) are within code allowable limits to
adequately resist imposed vertical and lateral loads.
- 252 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 253 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Retained heights
Embedment depth of footing required below grade – See geotechnical report
Allowable soil pressure
Passive pressure factor
Active earth pressure factor
Coefficient of friction
Backfill slope (don’t exceed about 2:1 horizontal: vertical unless approved by the
geotechnical engineer)
Axial loads on stem
Surcharge loads
Wind, if applicable
Seismic criteria if applicable
Soil density
Concrete and masonry allowable stresses (fcu, fc, fy,….etc)
- 254 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Empirical Dimension
𝐵1 = 0.3 H 𝐵1 = 0.2 H
𝐵2 = 0.6 H 𝐵2 = 0.45 H
𝑡𝑓 = 0.4 𝐵2 𝑡𝑓 = 0.4 𝐵2
B3=0.7 B3= (0.5-0.7) H
Back face slope more than 1:4
- 255 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
3. Compute all applied loads, soil pressures, seismic, wind, axial, surcharges, impact, or any
others.
4. Compute overturning moments, calculated about the front (toe) bottom edge of the footing.
For a trial, assume the footing width, to be about 0.4 to 0.7’s the height of the wall, with 1/3
being at the toe.
5. Compute resisting moments based upon the assumed footing width, calculated about the front
edge of the footing.
- 256 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
6. Overturning Moments
Overturning moments, are horizontally applied forces multiplied by the moment arm from the
bottom of the footing to the line of action of the force. The primary force causing overturning is:-
a. The lateral earth pressure against the wall. Derived from a triangular pressure diagram, its
point of application is one-third the height above the bottom of the footing. The height used
to compute over-turning is on the virtual plane at the back of the footing (i.e., where this
plane intersects the ground surface).
b. Lateral pressure from a surcharge is a uniform load applied to the back of the wall, therefore
its point of application is one-half the height and the moment arm is from that point down to
the bottom of the footing.
c. The lateral water pressure against the wall due to ground water table.
d. Wind pressure on the stem projecting above the soil or on a fence sitting atop a wall can also
cause overturning. Wind pressures are computed in accordance with the applicable building
code.
e. Seismic, if applicable, will also contribute to overturning.
7. Resisting Moments
By convention, resisting forces are all vertical loads applied to the footing. These forces include:-
The total resisting moment is the summation of these loads multiplied by the moment arm of each
measured from the front bottom edge of the footing. The generally accepted factor of safety against
overturning is 1.5, although some agencies require more. When seismic is included, a factor of safety
is 1.1.
𝒘×𝒙
F.S = ≥ 1.5
𝑬×𝒚
𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒎𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕
F.S = ≥ 1.5
𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒎𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕
- 257 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
10. Based upon an acceptable factor of safety against overturning, calculate the eccentricity of the
total vertical load. Is it within or outside the middle-third of the footing width?
11. Check sliding. A factor of safety with respect to sliding of 1.5 or more is standard. A key or
adjusting the footing depth may be required to achieve an accepted factor of safety with
respect to sliding.
- 258 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Sliding force = Ʃ E
Stability force = 𝝁 × 𝒘 + 𝒄`𝑩
𝝁 = tan 𝝋 → 𝟐⁄𝟑 tan 𝝋
C`= (0.5 − 0.75) C
𝝁×𝒘+𝒄`𝑩
F.S = ≥ 1.5
𝑬
In which;
C: soil cohesion.
If the check of sliding force is not safe use a key beneath the footing or increase the footing
width
- 259 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
12. Calculate the soil pressure at the toe and heel. If the eccentricity, e, is > B/6 (B = width of
footing) it will be outside the middle third of the footing width (not recommended!), and
because there cannot be tension between the footing and soil, a triangular pressure
distribution will be the result.
−𝑵 𝑴𝒚
𝝈𝟏𝟐 = ±
𝑨 𝑰
- 260 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
13. Check and review. Have all geotechnical report requirements been met?
14. Place a note on the structural sheets and on the structural calculations indicating that the
backfill is to be placed and compacted in accordance with the geotechnical report.
15. Review the construction drawings and specifications for conformance with the design.
- 261 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
To resist sliding, the weight of the wall plus the weight of the soil above the footing plus vertical
loads on the wall and any permanent surcharges multiplied by the coefficient of friction between the
foundation soil and the bottom of the footing, plus the passive pressure resistance force at the front of
the wall, must be sufficient to resist the lateral force pushing on the wall. The recommenced safety
factor against sliding is 1.5.
The stem must be designed to resist the bending caused by earth pressures, including the effect of
surcharges placed behind the wall, seismic or wind if applicable, impact loads, or axial loads acting
eccentrically on the wall. The maximum bending and shear stresses in a cantilevered wall will be at
the bottom of the stem. Each of these subjects will be discussed later.
- 262 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
B = (0.4 → 0.7) H
3. Compute all applied loads, soil pressures, seismic, wind, axial, surcharges, impact, or any
others.
- 263 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
4. Compute overturning moments, calculated about the front (toe) bottom edge of the footing
at point T. For a trial, assume the footing width, to be about 0.4 to 0.7’s the height of the
wall, with 1/3 being at the toe.
5. Compute resisting moments based upon the assumed footing width, calculated about the
front edge of the footing.
6. An overturning factor of safety of at least 1.5 is considered standard of practice.
7. Based upon an acceptable factor of safety against overturning, calculate the eccentricity of
the total vertical load. Is it within or outside the middle-third of the footing width?
8. Check sliding. A factor of safety with respect to sliding of 1.5 or more is standard. A key
or adjusting the footing depth may be required to achieve an accepted factor of safety with
respect to sliding.
- 264 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 265 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
9. Calculate the soil pressure at the toe and heel. If the eccentricity, e, is > B/6 (B = width of
footing) it will be outside the middle third of the footing width (not recommended!), and
because there cannot be tension between the footing and soil, a triangular pressure
distribution will be the result.
−𝑵 𝑴𝒙 𝒚
𝑭𝟏 𝟐 = ±
𝑨 𝑰𝒙
−𝑵 𝟔𝒆
𝑭𝟏 𝟐 = (1 + )
𝑩 𝑩
- 266 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 267 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 268 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 269 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 270 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
B = (0.4 → 0.7) H
3. Compute all applied loads, soil pressures, seismic, wind, axial, surcharges,
impact, or any others.
4. Compute overturning moments, calculated about the front (toe) bottom edge of the footing at
point T.
5. Compute resisting moments based upon the assumed footing width, calculated about the front
edge of the footing.
6. An overturning factor of safety of at least 1.5 is considered standard of practice.
7. Based upon an acceptable factor of safety against overturning, calculate the eccentricity of the
total vertical load. Is it within or outside the middle-third of the footing width?
8. Check sliding. A factor of safety with respect to sliding of 1.5 or more is standard. A key or
adjusting the footing depth may be required to achieve an accepted factor of safety with
respect to sliding.
9. Calculate the soil pressure at the toe and heel. If the eccentricity, e, is > B/6 (B = width of
footing) it will be outside the middle third of the footing width (not recommended!), and
because there cannot be tension between the footing and soil, a triangular pressure
distribution will be the result.
−𝑵 𝑴𝒙 𝒚
𝑭𝟏𝟐 = ±
𝑨 𝑰𝒙
−𝑵 𝟔𝒆
𝑭𝟏𝟐 = (1 + )
𝑩 𝑩
- 271 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
The stem acts as a continuous slab spanning longitudinally over the counterforts. The horizontal
active soil pressure acts as the load on the slab. Since the earth pressure varies linearly over the
height of the stem, the slab deflects away from the earth face between the counterforts and hence the
main steel is provided at the outer face of the stem and at the inner face near the supporting
counterforts. The bending moment in the stem is the maximum at the base and reduces towards top.
However, the thickness of the wall is kept constant and only the area of steel is reduced. The slab is
designed for bending moment as follow:
- 272 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 273 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 274 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
The heel slab is designed as a continuous slab supported over the counterforts, as in the case of stem.
The heel slab is subjected to downward forces due to weight of soil plus own-weight of slab and an
upward force due to soil reaction. The net force acts downward producing tension towards the earth
face between the counterforts and negative moment develops at the support provided by counterforts.
If p is the net downward force and L is the clear span between the counterforts the B.M. is given by:
Maximum B.M+ve = pl2/12 (mid-way between counterforts towards earth face)
Maximum B.M-ve = pl2/10 (occurring at counterforts)
- 275 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 276 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
𝑀
T= Design of sections according to the principle of crack control
𝑥
The width of the counterfort could be calculated b=M/x2
- 277 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 278 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
𝑒1+ 𝑒2
𝑇ℎ = (𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 + ( )) ×L
2
𝐴𝑆 = 𝑐𝑚2 /𝑚 this area of steel is the area of one steel mesh is put in each side
𝑇𝑉 /2
∴ 𝐴𝑆 = 𝑐𝑚2 /𝑚 this area of steel is the area of one steel mesh is put in each side
𝑓𝑦/γ𝑠
- 279 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Note:
- 280 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
The foundation base and heel get most saturated due to the water percolating through the back fill as
well as from the structure itself thereby building up high pore water pressure and softening of the
foundation. The excessive pore water pressure developed there would increase the lateral earth
pressure significantly, resulting in high probability of structural failure. Therefore, if we make some
arrangements to drain off water from the heel and foundation base, this would greatly help to relieve
the pore water pressure thereby contributing to stability of the retaining wall.
In order to increase the stability of retaining wall and prevent structural failure, it has introduced a
subsoil drainage system to facilitate the proper flow of water behind and below the wall. The system
consists of a longitudinal drain running adjacent to the heel (bottom back) of the wall and transverse
drains to drain off the water coming to the longitudinal drain. depth with 3% outward slope is typical
design. The drains shall be filled with broken stone chips (aggregate) or gravel (20 – 70 mm size)
whichever is practicable as per site conditions. The aggregates or gravel shall be wrapped in
geotextile to prevent clogging due to fine-grained soils.
- 281 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 282 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Wall drainage
Accumulation of rain water in the back fill results in its saturation, and thus a considerable increase
in the earth pressure acting on the wall. This may eventually lead to unstable conditions. Two of the
options to take care of this problem are the following:
Provision of weep holes with geo-textile filter on the back-face of wall
This should have a minimum diameter of 10 cm and be adequately spaces depending on the backfill
material. Geo-textile material or a thin layer of some other filter may be used on the back face of
wall for the full height in order to avoid the back fill material entering the weep holes and eventually
clogging them.
Perforated pipe-draining system with filter.
- 283 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
2- Inclined drains
3- Combination of inclined and horizontal drain used for cohesive soil
4- Top drains used for clay backfills
Wall joints
Expantion joint: these verticl joints are provided in large retaining walls to allow for the expansion of
the concrete due to tempreture changes and they are usually extended from top of the wall to bottom.
These joints maybe filled with flexible joint fillers. Horizontal reinforcing steel bars running across
the stem are continuous through all joints. However, the current thinking is that the large resistance
to expansion / contraction on the back face of the wall from lateral pressure + the friction resistance
of the base. These joints are practically useless.
- 284 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 285 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Unfortunately, poor design or lack of maintenance and care can result in a retaining wall becoming badly
damaged with the potential for wall failure and collapse.
The following shows common issues that may lead to the failure of a retaining wall:
Reinforced concrete walls – If the reinforcement or the concrete filling has been designed or placed
incorrectly there is an inadequate flexural capacity of the structure, leading to wall failures, including
premature cracking, excessive deflections and even collapse.
Foundation issues – Although a geotechnical report should always be sought before the construction
of a substantial retaining wall, inadequate factors of safety or perhaps unforeseen latent conditions
may lead to in ground slip or bearing inadequacies and failure of the retaining wall.
Inappropriate backfill material – The retained soil behind the retaining wall requires a vertical
drainage path to prevent the build-up of water behind the wall, which can generate an increase in the
pressure behind the wall. Often a contractor may use a “clayey” soil backfill, which holds moisture,
and unless a vertical drainage layer is installed there is a build-up of water pressure against the wall
and an increased risk of wall collapse.
Inadequate drainage –As mentioned above, if water is not effectively removed from the back of the
wall by providing a vertical drainage layer, water pressure may build up, increasing the lateral
pressure onto the retaining structure. The base of the vertical drainage layer must have horizontal
drainage pipework to remove the water. Weep holes can also be installed at the base of the wall above
the lower ground level in order to ensure there is no build-up of water pressures. Most importantly,
ongoing maintenance is a must so that the drainage system remains clear for the passage of water
flow.
Compaction induced pressures –During compaction of the backfill behind the wall with heavy
machinery, excessive surcharge pressures may be generated causing damage to the wall.
- 286 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
Inadequate backfill compaction – Some walls rely on tiebacks to restrain the facing wall, such as
Reinforced Earth Structures. If the ground is not fully compacted around the tiebacks or the soil is
loosened, the tiebacks can release and the wall will become unrestrained and move.
An overloaded retaining wall can pose a significant risk to property and person.
A retaining wall structure is not only considered to have failed if it has collapsed, but also significant bulging
and cracking can also lead to the retaining wall being classified as failed and in imminent danger of collapse.
A failed retaining wall may also cause excessive movement of the retained soil and cause damage to any
property foundations within the zone of influence of the wall.
Identifiers
There are several indicators that could signal the beginnings of a failed retaining wall:
Excessive deflection – A cantilever retaining wall is designed for a small amount of lateral movement,
of the order 1-2mm per metre of height. However, if the retaining wall’s lateral deflection exceeds
5mm per metre of its retained height it needs to be investigated. This can be easily verified with a
plumb bob.
Bulging – In the latter stages of a wall overload a retaining wall may develop a “pregnant” bulge at
about a third of the height up the wall. This is especially the case with old stone walls.
Cracking – Cracking along the length of your retaining wall could be caused by settlement or
differential shrinkage movement, and indicates that the structure may be in an unstable condition.
Weep Holes – If the retaining wall has weep holes and are not ‘weeping’ water, particularly after
heavy rainfall periods, it could mean that the drainage provisions behind the wall are blocked, leading
to excess hydrostatic pressure exerted onto the wall and potential overload.
- 287 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
(1) Check the stability of the shown plain concrete retaining wall. Consider 1.0 t/m2 live
load.
Soil data: 1.0
γsoil =1.65t/m3, Ø=25o, γsub.=0.90
t/m3, C=0.20 kg/cm2
Soil bearing capacity =1.35
kg/cm2
(2) For the shown weir, it is required to check weir’s body materials (consider critical case
only).
γc=2.2 t/m3
- 288 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
(3) It’s required to design the shown reinforced concrete retaining wall. (the vertical slab
was provided with horizontal beams). Consider 0.50 t/m2 live load.
Soil data:
γsoil =1.80 t/m3, Ø=28o
Soil bearing capacity =1.40 kg/cm2
Beams
- 289 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
(5) It’s required to construct a channel rested on soil to pass water. The proposed channel
layout is as shown. Design all elements of the channel and check it’s stability.
γsoil =1.70 t/m3, Ø=30o
Soil bearing capacity =1.25 kg/cm2
Figure (5)
- 290 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (6) Retaining Wall
- 291 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
1- Super structure.
2- Supports.
3- Foundation.
•Type of bridges:
1- Arch Bridges:
Those are built of stones, bricks, or plain concrete.
Common types in Egypt:
a. 900 Segmental arch of span up to 5 m.
b. 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖 − 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟.
2- Rolled steel joist bridge.
3- Timber Bridges
- 292 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
1- Slab bridge.
Slab Bridge
ts = 30 : 40 cm
- 293 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
Girder Bridge
𝑡𝑠 = (20−30) cm
- 294 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
2- Skew Bridge
- 295 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
Design of
bridge
Hydraulic Stractural
design design
Hydraulic design:
A = (b + zy) y
P = b+2y√1 + 𝑧 2
𝐴
R=
𝑃
1 2⁄ 1⁄
𝑉𝑐 = 𝑅 3 𝑠 2
𝑛
𝑉𝑐 =
• 𝑉𝑏 = (2−3 )𝑉𝑐
∴ 𝑉𝑏 =
- 296 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
𝑄
a= = =𝑛 ×𝑠×𝑑
𝑉𝑏
Where:
N: number of vents
S: span of vent
d: water depth
Assume n find S
Check:
𝑛 × 𝑠 + (𝑛 − 1 ) 𝑡𝑝 ⊀ 0.6 𝑏
ℎ𝑙 ⊁ 10cm
𝑣𝑐 2
ℎ𝑙 = 𝛼 𝛽 ⊁ 10cm
2𝑔
- 297 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
𝐴−𝑎
𝛼=
𝐴
- 298 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
1. Structural design:
- Main elements of R.C. Bridge:
Super structures
1) Slab,
2) Side Walk,
3) Main girder,
substructures
4) Pier,
5) Abutment,
6) Foundation
Span
1. 20T lorry
- 299 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
2. 60 T lorry
0.50
2.0
0.1 0.5
0.50
0.50
2.0
0.50
- 300 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
2- Allowable stresses :
𝐹𝑐 = 90 kg/𝑐𝑚2
𝐹𝑐𝑢 = 250 kg/𝑐𝑚2
1. Design of slab:
1. Dead load
𝐿
𝑡𝑠 = → (20−30)cm
(8−12)
𝛾 = 2.5 t/𝑚3
𝒘𝑳𝟐
𝑴𝑫.𝑳 = =
𝟏𝟎
- 301 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
2. Live load
B`= b + 𝑡𝑠 + 2𝑡𝑐
A = a + 2𝑡𝑐 + 𝑡𝑠
B = B`+ 𝛼L
- 302 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
𝑃 𝐿 𝑃 𝐴
M= × − ×
2𝐵` 2 2𝐵` 4
𝑃 𝐿 𝐴
= ( − )
2𝐵` 2 4
Due to the continuity of the slab and the moment of simply supported should multiply
by 0.8
𝑷 𝑳 𝑨
M= ( – )× 𝟎. 𝟖
𝟐𝑩` 𝟐 𝟒
- 303 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
4 𝑃 𝐿 𝐴
= × ( – )
5 2𝐵` 2 4
𝑷 𝟐𝑳−𝑨
𝑴𝑳.𝑳 = 𝟓 ( )
𝟐𝑩`
Due to the impact of the lorry the moment due to live load should multiple by impact
factor (I)
24
Impact factor = I = → (20 → 50)%
24+𝐿
- 304 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
A. Dead load
𝑤𝑙 2
𝑀𝐷.𝐿 = =
8
- 305 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
B. Live load
a) L ≤ 6.4m
b) L > 6.4
- 306 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
∴ 𝑀𝐿.𝐿 =
𝑀𝐿.𝐿 (1+𝐼) =
- 307 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
For the case of maximum shear force (Q) a tire load is put on the support and the other
tires load are arranged due to the girder span.
M=
Q=
- 308 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
It is T sec.
B = 16 𝑡𝑠 + 𝑏0 →
C.L − C.L →
span
⁄3 →
𝑄
𝑞= > 9𝑘𝑔/𝑐𝑚2
𝑏. 𝑑
𝑛 ∗ 𝐴ø ∗ 𝑓𝑠
𝑞𝑠𝑡 =
𝑏∗𝑒
4. Design of pier:
- 309 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
𝑆
𝑡𝑝 =
6−12
- 310 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
Solved example:
A reinforced concrete bridge is to be constructed across the canal whose cross section
is shown:-
Given that:
Solution:
A = (b + zy) y = (18+1×3) ×3 = 63. 0 𝑚2
P = b + 2y √1 + 𝑧 2 = 18 + 2 × 3 √2 = 26.48 m
𝐴 63
R= = = 2.378 m
𝑝 26.48
1 2⁄ 1⁄
𝑣𝑐 = 𝑅 3 𝑆 2
𝑛
- 311 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
1 2⁄ 1⁄
= × (2.378) 3 × (0.00008) 2
0.025
= 0.6375 m/sec
a=n×S×d
30.90 = 2 × S × 3
∴ S = 5.20 m
n × S + (n – 1) 𝑡𝑝 ≥ 0.6B
0.63752 63
ℎ𝑙 = (( )2 -1) = 0.069 m = 6.90 cm < 10 𝑐𝑚 O.K
2×9.81×0.92 31.20
𝛼𝛽𝑣𝑐 2
ℎ𝑙 =
2𝑔
63−31.2
𝛼= = 0.505
63
- 312 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
𝛽 = 0.68
0.505×0.68×(0.6375)2
∴ ℎ𝑙 = = 0.0071m = 0.71cm
2×9.81
Design of slab:
- 313 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
24
I= = 0.9
24+1.837
Take I = 0.5
- 314 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
T = 25 d = 22
𝑀𝑢 7.07×105
d = 𝑐1 √ 22 = 𝑐1 √ 𝑐1 = 4.14 J = 0.808
F𝑐𝑢 ×b 250×100
1 𝑀𝑢 1 7.07×105
𝐴𝑠 = = × = 13.81 cm2/m'
𝐵𝑐𝑟 𝑓𝑦 ×𝐽×𝑑 0.8 3600×0.808×22
∴ Use 7 Ø 16/m`
𝐴𝑠 ` = 0.3× 𝐴𝑠 = 4.14
Use 7 Ø 12/m`
1×1.52
= + 0.25× 1.5 + 0.1 × 1 = 1.6 m`.t
2
- 315 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
𝑀𝑢 2.4×105
d = 𝑐1 √ 18 = 𝑐1 √ 𝑐1 = 5.81 J = 0.826
F𝑐𝑢 ×b 250×100
1 𝑀𝑢 1 2.4×105
𝐴𝑠 = = × = 5.45 cm2/m'
𝐵𝑐𝑟 𝑓𝑦 ×𝐽×𝑑 0.85 3600×0.826×18
Use 5 Ø 12/m`
Take T = 75 cm b = 35 cm
2.1×(5.5)2
𝑀𝐷.𝐿 = = 7.94 t/m
8
L.L :
L< 6m
- 316 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
0.5×1.337×1.337⁄2
𝑃2 = = 0.24 t/m
1.837
24
I= = 0.77 take I = 0.5
24+7
15
R = 15 + + 0.24 × 2.75 = 23.16 t
2
𝑀𝐿.𝐿 = 23.16 × 2.75 −15 × 1.5 − 0.24 × 2.75 × 1.375 = 40.28 m.t
- 317 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
Case of shear
0.92×1×0.5+0.24×4.5×3.25+15×2.5+15×4+15×5.5
𝑄𝐿.𝐿 = 𝑅𝑚𝑎𝑥 = = 33.45 t
5.5
5.5
𝑄𝐿.𝐿 + 𝑄𝐷.𝐿 = 𝑄𝑇 = 33.45 + 2.1 × = 39.23 t
2
Or B = C.L-C.L = 1.837 m
Or B = L/5 +b = 1.45 m
∴ B = 1.45 m
𝑀𝑢 72.33×105
d = 𝑐1 √ 70 = 𝑐1 √ 𝑐1 = 4.95 J = 0.826
F𝑐𝑢 ×b 250×145
1 𝑀𝑢 1 72.33×105
𝐴𝑠 = = × = 53.5 cm2
𝐵𝑐𝑟 𝑓𝑦 ×𝐽×𝑑 0.65 3600×0.826×70
Use 14 Ø 22
4 Ø 18 shrinkage bars
4 Ø 18 stirrup hunger
- 318 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
Shear check:
𝑄𝑢 39.23×1.5×103
q= = = 24.01 kg/cm2 > qall
𝑏×𝑑 35×70
Design of pier :
- 319 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
- 320 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
• In this type of Bridges steel I Beam at equal spaces are used as main girders with
space range from ( 1− 1.5) m
1- Timber flooring
a- wearing planks
b- Main planks
2- Main girder
3- Cross girder
Wearing surface
- 321 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
Main planks
b = 20−25 − 30𝑐𝑚
be neglected
∴ 𝑀𝐷.𝐿 = neglected
𝑝 𝑎
L.L:𝑀𝑙.𝑙(1+𝐼) = 1.2 (𝐿⁄2 − )
2 4
𝑝 𝑎
𝑀𝑙.𝑙(1+𝐼) = 1.2 (𝐿⁄2 − ) ×0.8 → continous
2 4
𝑝 𝑎
𝑀𝑙.𝑙(1+𝐼) = 1.2 (𝐿⁄2 − ) ×1 → simple
2 4
𝑀
Z=
𝑓
𝑏𝑡 2
Z=
6
For timber
𝛾 = (0.8−0.9) t/𝑚3
𝑓𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝 = 85 kg/𝑐𝑚2
- 322 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges
𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 85 kg/𝑐𝑚2
D.L
𝐿
Assume d =
(15−25)
- 323 -
Design of Irrigation structures Chapter (7) Bridges