Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Engineering Design
The Complete Structural PackageTM
2
Lean Construction Institute
Fitzpatrick Engineering Group
• Doug Fitzpatrick, P.E.
– President and Founder
– Structural design of buildings
– Actively involved in day-to-day engineering
– BIM advocate since 2006
3
Lean Construction Institute
History
• Process of designing and constructing (commercial)
steel buildings has remained essentially unchanged
for decades.
• Steel detailer
– Figures out exactly how the pieces go together
for structural plans and details, design intent.
– Conveys that info to the fabricator via 2D PDF
shop drawings and CNC files for their
equipment
Lean Construction Institute
Workflows
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Time savings
Cost savings??
“Alternate Construction Methods”
6
Lean Construction Institute
Workflows
Fabricator selected
based on GMP
7
Lean Construction Institute
Workflows
Fabricator selected
based on GMP
8
Lean Construction Institute
Workflows
Fabricator selected
based on GMP
Confusion
The earlier the Fabricator gets involved:
Less accuracy in GMP
More opportunities for change orders in the
ensuing confusion as design gets finished
Opportunities for change
orders and RFIs to fuel
change orders
9
Lean Construction Institute
Workflows
Fabricator selected
based on GMP
Confusion
The earlier the Fabricator gets involved:
Less accuracy in GMP
More opportunities for change orders in the
ensuing confusion as design gets finished
Opportunities for change
orders and RFIs to fuel
change orders
10
Lean Construction Institute
Workflows
Fabricator
selected based
on GMP
11
Lean Construction Institute
Workflows
Fabricator selected
based on GMP
There
Design is a limit! Construction
Detailing
Fabrication
12
Lean Construction Institute
The tipping point
• Summer of 2012
– Fabricator selected based on Guaranteed Maximum
Price (GMP) during Design Development (DD)
– Received “pitiful” set of shop drawings
– Sent out incomplete / poorly checked to “maintain the
schedule”
– 50% more time checking
13
Lean Construction Institute
Reflection
14
Lean Construction Institute
Solution Requirements
• Electronic data transfer
• Sent incrementally
• Overlap the design phase
• Reduce or eliminate change orders
• Leverage inherent efficiencies
• Be flexible to owner’s process
• Save significant time
• Reduce or eliminate RFIs
15
Lean Construction Institute
Transfer of Information
• Fall of 2012 found:
– Detailing software package that could incrementally
read structural data with global IDs
– BIM that could reliably export data with global IDs
– Detailing partner with same enthusiasm
16
Lean Construction Institute
Fabricator Preferences
• East coast – typical connections
• Changes (outside model) cost detailer time
– Changing in 3D = 1x
– Tracking changes on paper = 3x
• Change provenance important for AISC certification
• Solution – stay in 3D as long as possible
– Make modifications easily as design changed
– Adapt to selected fabricator’s preferences
• Graphed data (size of building in square feet vs. time) to see where
the opportunities might be
18
Lean Construction Institute
FEG Project Data
19
Lean Construction Institute
FEG Project Data
20
Lean Construction Institute
Fabrication package time
• Preparation 8-9 weeks
• Review by Contractor 1-2 weeks
• Review by Architect 1-2 weeks
• Review by Engineer 6-7 weeks
• Mailing/shipping time 1-2 weeks
21
Lean Construction Institute
Fabrication package time
• Preparation 8-9 weeks
• Review by Engineer 6-7 weeks
• Difference 8 weeks
22
Lean Construction Institute
Improved Communication
• Phone calls
• Screen sharing
• Direct electronic review of the detailer’s live model
– Approval mode only
– No paper submittals
24
Lean Construction Institute
Case Studies
• Otarre MOB
– Two story, 73,000 sf
– Structural frame 318 tons
– Five (5) week turnaround from
fabricator’s
notice to proceed
– No RFIs and no change orders
25
Lean Construction Institute
Case Studies
• Octapharma
– Two story, 87,000 sf
– Structural frame – 340 tons
– Same process as the previous
two case studies
– No RFIs
– Change orders?
26
Lean Construction Institute
Transforming Deliverables
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Time savings
Detailing complete in 8 weeks Dollar savings
3D model at CDs
FEG Process
27
Lean Construction Institute
Risk/Liability
• BIM journey started in 2006
• First BIM project – Level of Detail/Development
(LOD) 300 (beams, columns)
– Shared data with fabricator/detailer
• All BIM since – LOD 350
– Only difference to detailer’s model is connections
• Electronic model review lets us focus on the
important parts
• Liability Risk
28
Lean Construction Institute
Working Relationships
• Who works for who?
– Detailer works for FEG
• This is not engineers doing shop drawings
• No formal partnership
• Separate entity
• Most fabricators do not have in-house detailing
– FEG works for
• Architect (during design)
• Contractor (during or after design)
• Owner (during design)
• Fabricator (during or after design)
29
Lean Construction Institute
Plus / Delta
Plus Delta
• Proof of concept to shorten schedules • Engineers
• Flexibility for owner – bid versus • Liability
negotiated • Not perfect
• Not a proprietary solution • Not easy
• Improved communication • Cannot be just any detailer
• Decreased risk / liability
• Trust based
• Early meaningful involvement of
detailer / fabricator
• Not unique to a single project
• Reduced waste - no paper shop
drawings
• Minimal recreation of structural data
• Flexibility in working relationships
• Upgraded old process into something
more efficient
• FEG engineers think about end goal –
sharing data
Thank you
Questions?
31
Lean Construction Institute