Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER II

SAN MATEO AND CABAGAN, ISABELA

TRAINING DESIGN

TITLE : CAPACITY BUILDING FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE


DEVELOPMENT

PROPONENT/
IMPLEMENTING UNIT: MADDELA - MUNICIPAL AGRICULTURE OFFICE

PARTICIPANTS : 30 FARMERS

DATE : JUNE 27, 2019

VENUE : VILLA GRACIA, MADDELA, QUIRINO

BUDGETARY
REQUIREMENT :

FUND SOURCE : AGRICULTURAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, R2

PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY:

SATURNINO C. SILIN JOVENCIO G. SALVADOR


C/Farm Worker Municipal Agriculturist
Date Prepared: 06/27/2019 Date Reviewed:

ROSALINDA B. LUCERO
Chief, CDMSS
Date Reviewed.

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: FUNDS AVAILABLE:

MARITES E. FROGOSO, DPA ELAINE D. JINTALAN


OIC, Assistant Center Director Budget Officer
Date Recommended: Date Signed:

APPROVED BY:

IMELDA M. GUILLERMO
OIC, Center Director
Date Approved:
ATI-QF/CDMD-25 Rev. 00 Effectivity Date: May 7, 2017 P a g e |1
I. RATIONALE

Capacity building has become central goals of development organizations working


in developing countries to rural development programs in reducing poverty and
empowering local people for livelihood improvement. Development organizations tended
to transfer modern technology to farmers or provide formal education to rural communities.
These activities are conducted by government or non-government organization
researchers and extension workers, with involvement of local people. Improving capacity
building of individuals, groups, organizations and communities is therefore necessary for
rural development, poverty alleviation and environmental protection. Eade (2007) pointed
out that if you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, and if you teach him to fish, you
feed him for a lifetime. Building the capacity of local people, groups and organizations is
vital because they must have the ability and responsibility to resolve their problems and
develop their communities. Whereas the concept of capacity translates assets and abilities
into performance, the concept of capacity building is associated with transformation
processes and increments in capacities or performance. The act of increasing capacities
encompasses the enhancement of abilities to use assets productively. A major challenge
facing food security projects is ensuring their capacity building activities are not only
instrumental to the success of a specific project component, but that the new capacities
will be put to use and contribute to the sustainability of food security in communities over
the long-term. Therefore, food security projects can increase communities’ asset bases by
investing in training and providing other material and physical inputs, by developing new
tools and by increasing the population’s knowledge level in agriculture, specifically in
Banana Production, Corn Production and Rice Production. In project management,
capacity building is an approach to strengthen designing, implementation, monitoring,
management, and evaluation of projects.

II. TERMINAL OBJECTIVE

To establish the contribution of capacity building interventions on smallholder farmer to


food security

ENABLING OBJECTIVES
1. To determine the contribution of training of smallholder farmers to food security
2. To examine the contribution of networking smallholder farmers to food security
3. To evaluate the contribution of gender mainstreaming of smallholder farmers to food
security

III. PARTICIPANTS

A Total of 30 farmer- participant from Brgy Villa Gracia are expected to attend the Farmer Field
School on Good Agriculture Practices (GAP) for Lowland Vegetable Production.

IV. COURSE CONTENT

V. METHODOLOGY

ATI-QF/CDMD-25 Rev. 00 Effectivity Date: May 7, 2017 P a g e |2


To create conducive learning atmosphere and generate the desired outputs, the following methods
will be employed:

 Lecture-discussion
 Participatory-discussion

 Brainstorming

 Demonstration and Focus Group Discussion

 Workshop

 Group Dynamic and Feed Backing

 Folk Media

 Field Day

VI. OUTPUT

The expected output for the conduct of Farmer Field School is terminal report, documentation,
attendance evaluation of the training resource persons.

VII.EVALUATION SCHEME

The training course shall implement monitor and evaluate activities at various stages:

 Pre-training – participants’ profiling and pre-test on training content, surfacing of participants


and training team expectations;
 During training – participants’ observation by training team, rating of outputs, rating of
practicum and evaluation of module presentations; and
 Post-training – post-test on course content and over-all course evaluation by participants. A
longer-term evaluation will be done on the application of skills on organizing and
implementing FBS.

VIII. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

A. Manpower Requirements

 Training Management

 Resource Person

B. Supplies and Materials

C. Facilities and Equipment

D. Budgetary Requirements

PARTICULARS AMOUNT
ATI-QF/CDMD-25 Rev. 00 Effectivity Date: May 7, 2017 P a g e |3
Food
Supplies and Materials
TEV
Fuel
Communication
Honorarium
TOTAL

IX. SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES

DAY TIME ACTIVITY/TOPIC PERSON RESPONSIBLE

ATI-QF/CDMD-25 Rev. 00 Effectivity Date: May 7, 2017 P a g e |4

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen