f CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I 4 Under . JOSE EDMUND E. GUILLEN, LL.B., LL.M. (UMLS) LIST OF CASES A. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE PHILIPPINES 1, De Leon v. Esguerra, 153 SCRA 602 (1987) 2. Angara y, Electoral Commission 63 Phil.139 (1936) B. THE CONCEPT OF THE STATE 4 i 7A } |. Bacani v. Nacoco 100 PHIL 468 (1956) <2) PVTA v. CIR 65 SCRA 416 (1975) 3. Govt. of the Phil. Islands v. Monte de Piedad 35 PHIL. 728 4 CoKim Chan v. Valdez Tan Keh 75 PHIL 113 (1945) | 5. People v. Gozo 53 SCRA 476 (1973). f M1. R.A. No. 5446, September 8, 1968 12. PD. No, 1599, June 11, 1978 13. R.A. No, 9522 ~ New Phils. Baseline Law | 14, Merlin M. Magalona et. al., vs. Eduardo Ermita, August 16, 2011 | Government 15. Go Kim Chan v. Valdez Tan Keh 16, Lawyers League for a Better Phils. V. Aquino, May 22, 1986 17. Villavicencio v. Lukban, 39 PHIL 778 Sovereignty 18, Peralta v, Director of Prisons, 75 PHIL 285 19. Rufly v, Chief of Staff, supra 20, Reagan v. CIR 30 SCRA 968 _—71. Province of North Cotabato v. The Govt. of the R. P., Oct. 14, 2008: C. STATE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT7. Veterans Manpower v. CA 214 SCRA 286 ‘Suit Against Govt, Agencies 8. PNB y, CIR 81 SCRA 314 9. SSS v. CA 120 SCRA 707 10. Rayo v, CFI of Bulacan 110 SCRA 460 11. Malong v. PNR 185 SCRA 63 12. Jesus P. Disini v. The Hon. Sandiganbayan, et. al.. June 22, 2010 13, Dept. of Agriculture v. NLRC 227 SCRA 693 ~ Suit Against Public Officers 14, VMPSI y. CA, 214 SCRA 286 15. Larkins v. NLRC 241. SCRA 598 ; 16, es CA191 SCRA 713 : 517, Republic v. Hon, rout LAA NATE sf ea saci” eae IU Se BjOcKYOIAEL2 OL Hr] Ot Los BEATS en note geo Oct Wve cbicu fo cuoose ct S fo oe spe peveyi2 gug pOWE|OZ {NEA L6ceiAsq MS2 NW ISCI {SACLSPIS (0 INS LMB]E sbbycsyou 04 jue obsisyrc WE bYBC Leeoirjjou 9 PS SbbiIeq fo Scie Just wrt pe $0 (NS UNIAWICSHIOU OL {ye piszigens OL (us QOCHIUS 12 OF HWUSA OU)A fo LAS hn FG AHOIEH 9 <= ite 30,1950 HT PS Lscouziqe.eg ecteI Husy we dnsiweN LIM A8CT FOCUS 12 BABYSPIS IU We CuesSection 10 & 11 -relate to Article XIN 9. Calalang y. Williams 70 PHIL 726 (1940) 10. Almeda v. Court of Appeals 78 SCRA 194 (197) I. Ondoy v. Ignacio 97 SCRA 611 (1980) 12, Salonga v. Farrales 165 SCRA 359 (1981) Sections 12- relate to Article XV & Sec. 13- relate to XIV, See. 19 13. Meyer v. Nebraska 262 US 390 14, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 US 510 (1925) 15. People v. Ritter 194 SCRA 690 16. Dept. of Education v. San Diego 180 SCRA 533 17. Virtuoso v. Mun. Judge 82 SCRA 191 Section 16 18. Oposa v. Factoran 224 SCRA 792 (1993) 19, LLDA v.CA 231 SCRA 292 (1994) Section 19 20. Garcia v. Board of Investments 191 SCRA 288 (1990) | Section 21 21. Ass. of Small Landowners in the Phils. V. Sec. of the DAR 175 SCRA 343 (1989) Section 22 22. The City Govt. of Baguio City v. Atty. Brain Masweng et. Al. Feb. 4, 2009 en Section 28 25. Legaspi v. Civil Service Commision 150 SCRA 530 (1987) 26. Valmonte v. De Villa 170 SCRA 256 (1989) 27. Aquino-Sarmiento v. Morato 203 SCRA 515(1991) 28. ‘The Province of North Cotabato v. Govt. ofthe RP. Peace Panel, Oct. 18, 2008. Hou ¢20 E. SEAPRATION OF POWERS “co meu In Re: Manzano 166 SCRA 246 (1988) ‘Angara v. Electoral Commission 63 PHIL 139-2. bys Eastem Shipping Lines v. POEA. 166 SCRA $33 6 sso, ¢ age |. Casibang v. Aquino 92 SCRA 642 ns Belin sla Oona Marenehey 1.2000 ae Sanidad vy. Comelec 73 Daza v. Singson 180 SCI 197 SCRA 52 (1991) Mange 70 SCRA 786 (1589) ouny Jot nOpaHIOU of, pe edna oi]? ob LSROYORIOME aie OR, 077 i . 1A Easter Shipping Lines v. POEA Supra! > A. Ynot v. IAC 148 SCRA 659 "5. Tablarin v. Gutietrez 152 SCRA 730 al 7 lta