Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Change, Bangalore.
supervision.
AI J - f)
C.-!~;-AL~ t<a..o
(Dr. Hemlata Rao)
Professor of Economics
Place: Bangalore Institute for Social & Economic Change
Date : 23rd May 1994 Nagarabhavi, Bangalore - 560 072.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
not have seen the light of the day. I am very much indebted
to her.
work.
administrative matters.
Place Bangalore
Date 23rd May 1994 ,~D. G. RUDRAMURTHY'
INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL-SCALE
INDUS'11UES IN KARNATAXA
Page No.
CHA.PTER I 01- 29
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER II 30-107
CHAP'I'ER. V 204-280
CIIAP'l'HR VI 281-291
Summary - Recommendations.
BIBUOGRAPHY 292-303
UST OF TABLES
2E. Share of SSI Expenditure during First Five Year Plan to Seventh
Five Year Plan of Karnataka
INTRODUCTION
the economy.
economically independent.
for the First Five- Year Plan. Since then depending on the
TABLE - 1.1
crores by the end of 1960 and Rs.700 crores duting 1970 had
lakh during 1970 and 9 lakh during 1980 and the number of
units increased to 19 lakh during March 1990. In the fifty's
for credit from the large and medium scale industry and
following measures.
Government incentives.
The Draft Fifth Five Year Plan also notes that "the
was faulty." 6
:ector.
)roviding medium and long term loans to SS1s. The S81, the
administered by lOBI.
three categories.
and
'
Hose l 1tz 7 deals mainly with the factors
SSIs.
network available.
Fifth Five Year Plan). The studies which have dealt with
mentioned here .
Desa1. 14 , d ea 1 s Wlt
. h t h e sources 0 f f·lnance for S5Is
17
Upadhyaya gives the financial spectrum for the
18
Pareek illustrate the need for finance for SSIs,
problem of finance and the present institutional net-work to
finance to SSIs.
Karnataka.
industrial development.
financial institutions.
prosperity. For centuries the area has been well known for
its trade with its neighbouring areas and even in export and
Annexure-I.
examined.
of SSI'.
been presented.
.he field survey and deals with the impact of assistance and
:he problems of 551 entrepreneurs. 100 small scale
GENERAL :
Districts 20
Sub Divisions 49
Talukas .. 175
Hoblies 745
Villages 27024
POPULATION (1991) :
INFRASTRUCTURE :
29
INDUSTRIES :
Large Scale Industries 217
employing less than 50 persons using power and less than 100
persons without use of power and with capital assets not
3
exceeding Rs.5.00 lakhs was considered as small-scale.
lakhs. 5
~nd
I
machinery. As a result rich people and members of big
IS [C lI8RARY B&NG&lORE
Aa:. N ~.9_~ Q ~ . __
:J.'1·6 95"
36
(2) SSIs are those which are not integrated with the
LSIs.
SSIs.
could be minimised.
the strategy for growth. Till the end of the Fifth Plan,
these industries were largely looked upon as suppliers of
9. Ibid., P.310.
40
in promoting exports.
I
basis of policy in the First Five Year Plan. The same was
to the Second World War. It was during the war years that a
~cale units.
~ith regard to SSIs during the pre plan era. IPR 1948 was
~he basis to frame the First Five Year Plan. It recommended
Madura.
lechnological unemployment.
producers.
OUTLAY :
During the Second Five Year Plan, out of the total
lIutlay of Rs. 4,800 crores, Rs.200 crores was earmarked for
PROGRESS
The progress during the first and second plans of
village and small industries were reviewed in the middle of
the second plan by a number of working groups and
committees. A Special Study Team assessed the working of 25
the First Five Year Plan, agriculture got all the importance
the public sector for the programmes for village and small
Blocks.
pROGRESS:
TABLE - 2.1
•• Agriculture
Industries
1068
1520
1089
1726
1.96
13.55
I·
J. Village & Small
Industries 264 240 ( -) 9.09
flanned expenditure.
TABLE - 2.2
.t
~urantees
Rs.33.74 crores to 3806 applicants. The RBI issued 36,055
OUTLAY:
plan (of this Rs.120 crores was for SSIs and Rs.25 crores
for the development of industrial estates).
CREDIT FACILITIES:
In the fourth plan a total outlay of over Rs.290
124.
The Fifth Plan could not continue its full term due to
TABLE - 2.3
2.Traditioa1
Village
Industries 2183 4419 102.21 132.84 362 1175
~er cent of the total credit flow was availed by 11 per cent
l
, ttempts made in the field of rural industrialisation and
lural employment envisaged providing to the SSIs and to the
since the Second Five Year Plan. But for this we would not
have had the capital goods base that we have, the highly
•investment.
67
TABLE - 2.4
1. Number of
units (lakhs) 0.36 2.82 8.74 13.55 19.40
2. Investment
(Rs. crores) 279.58 697.00 5850.00 9585.00 18196.00
3. Employment
(lakh persons) 21.59 36.70 71.00 96.00 126.26
4. Gross output
(Rs.crores) 1426.50 4860.00 21635.00 501520.00 143170.00
5. Exports
(Rs.crores) NA* 393.00 1050.00 2350.00 9100.00
* NA Not available.
;overnment.
69
Illustration - 2A
20 ............................................................................................................................................... .
15 .....................................................................................................................
10
5 ............................................................. .
o L--________
1960 19)'0 1QBO 1985 1GG0
Years
70
Illustration - 2B
Growth of Investment on SSIs in India
15 ..................................................................................................................... .
10
5 ........................................................... .
Illustration - 2C
120
100
BO
60 ............................................................. .
40
20
o
1960 uno 1980 1985 1990
Years
72
Illustration - 2D
150 .................................................................................................................................................
100 .....................................................................................................................
50 .........................................................................................
oL-------~. . . .--
1980 Hno 1gaO 1985 1990
Years
TABLE - 2.5
(Rs. in Crores)
1. Plan Expenditure
a) Village & Small
Industries 31.2 180 241 132.55 292.53 535.98 1945.00 3249.00
....,
b) of this SSIs 5.2 44.4 86.12 39.35 104.25 221.74 616.10 1137.15 w
2 • Total Plan
Expenditure 1960.00 4672.00 8577.00 6625.00 15779.00 39426.00 109292.00 218730.00
SOURCE: The Second, Third,Fourth and the Sixth Five Year Draft Plan and also The Economic
74
2.4. CONCLUSION
All the plan documents express similar feelings and
~oticed that the Second and the Fifth Five Year Plans in
terms of public sector outlay, were nearly 2.5 times each
\he expenditure of 1.59 per cent is the lowest and 3.85 per
cent is the highest. The importance of public sector as
provided for industries was 4.1 per cent of the total First
Plan outlay of which only 3 per cent was spent. 20 During the
period.
Rs. 442 Lakhs for the Third Plan. The continuing scheme
-tw industries.
the State has lost momentum. This was partially due to the
behind other States, and the other being the absence of the
24. Ibid.
80
production.
TABLE - 2.6
OUT-LAY IN FOURTH PLAN
(Amount in Rs. Lakhs)
ricultural
ogramme 6668.80 1394.00 1431.14
dustry and
ning 1547.67 181.00 189.00
of which VSIs 409.00 70.00 71.00
Total 26413.25 5071.29 5546.97
for the fourth five year plan underwent a revision and the
TABLE - 2.7
.72-73 42 3,42,199
I
322 30,04,413
of unemployment.
;he addi tion to the labour force each year, the resource
TABLE - 2.8
Total 2500.00
TABLE - 2.9
one fifth of the state income in the state and the share of
Karnataka in the total income from the manufacturing sector
crores and employing more than 7.5 lakhs persons. As per the
annual survey of industries, the share of the state in
set-up on an average per yer during the 7th plan period and
TABLE - 2.10
~,:;
unit) viz. , Zone I-Industrially most forward taluks
':i\
.Bangalore Urban, Mysore City Corporation limits). Zone II
_~Industrially forward taluks (380 taluks of the state). Zone
package adopted in the year 1990 were to have been valid for
30. Ibid.
94
1. VSIs 0.63 5.01 4.11 7.29 5.70 8.16 26.00 26.80 188.26
2. Industry 1.23 12.10 15.28 8.41 16.95 51.50 281.91 340.58 544.33
\D
VI
3. Agriculture 4.28 7.39 8.77 4.17 10.17 129.33 345.66 353.68 799.32
4. Total 40.54 145.13 264.14 179.78 287.94 SS4.69 2652.73 2922.84 11000.00
S. (l)As , of(4) 1.55 3.45 1.55 4.00 1.97 1.47 0.98 0.91 1.71
1. VSIs 0.63 5.01 4.11 7.29 5.70 8.16 26.00 26.80 188.26
2. Industry 1.23 12.10 15.28 8.41 16.95 51.50 281.91 340.58 544.33
\0
VI
3. Agriculture 4.28 7.39 8.77 4.17 10.17 129.33 345.66 353.68 799.32
4. Total 40.54 145.13 264.14 179.78 287.94 554.69 2652.73 2922.84 11000.00
5. (l}As % of(4) 1.55 3.45 1.55 4.00 1.97 1.47 0.98 0.91 1.71
Illustration - 2K
800 .............................................................................................. .
400 ............................................................................................
200 ...................................................................
Illustration - 2F
'
Thouiland.
1.~~~~------------------------------------~-.
12 .................................................................................................................................................
10 ..............................................................................................................................:..:~___
, .................................................................................................................................................
e .................................................................................................................................................
OLL-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L~~~~~~
ea '10 71 7Z 73 74 75 78 77 78 'nI 80 81
Years
- - No. of Untb
100
Illustration - 2G
- ThoUIiADd.
~r----------------------------------------------
20 .................................................................................................................................................. .
16 ................................................................................................................................................ .
10 ..................................................................................................................
6 ............................................................................. .
O~~~~~~-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L~-L-L-L-L-L-L-LJ
'72 73 7-' 75 78 77 78 7'a eo 81 82 83 M 85 88 87 88 8V ao VI
Years
101
Illustration - 20
Thoulilandlil
80,----------------------------------------------------,
00 ............................................................................................................................................ .
40
M 70 71 72 73 7~ 7& 7e 77 78 7V 80 81 82 83 ~ 85 8e 87 88 8i ~ it
Years
-4- EmplQ]1lM1nt
102
Illustration - 21
Fwd. Dir;te.
66.3%
Other Diste.
33.7%
NO. OF UNITS
103
Illustration - 2J
.................. ,
-: :-:-: : /
. -: -: -: -: -: -: -: . -: -: .:- -: -:
//
... :.:::::::::::::::::::::::.:.: ...
,/
--~Other Diflt.8.
34.6%
IN'lESTMENT
104
Illustration - 2K
F~td. DiBtB.
69.6%
terms of employment.
District only.
a financial one.
category.
living expenses.
,
•. Vide Gazette Notification No. S.0.232, Department of
Industrial Development, Ministry of Industries,
Government of India, New Delhi, dated 2.4.1991.
112
period for which they are made available. The more the
expenses.
such pre-requisite.
small-scale units.
115
to be more and the need for credit and capital was greater.
But artisans and craftsmen depended for their credit on
guilds which could raise enough finance from their members
and if necessary they borrowed from money lenders. Thus,
and
manufacture. 5
for labour.
larger the amount of the working capital and vice versa. And
sector for the Fourth Five Year Plan. The ARC felt that the
and Rs.lOOO crores by the end of the Fourth Five Year Plan
. d.7
perlo
or sureties.
7. Ibid, p.67
122
TABLE - 3.1
SOURCES OF FUNDS
(in per cent)
only 32.7 per cent. Inter alia medium and large scale
financial institutions.
Quotations.
TERM LOAN :
maturity beyond one year from the date made for purpose of
liquidation"9
following reasons:
far-sighted approach.
arrived at as below.
of Term loan.
demand.
TABLE - 3.2
3. Above 25,000/- up to
2.00 lakhs 16.5 (17.25) 16.5 (17.25)
4. Aggregate limits *
over Rs. 2.00 lakhs
up to Rs. 25.00 lakhs
b) BEs 18.5-19.5-20.5
(19.25-20.25-21.25)
a) Hotels/Restaurant/Small
Hospitals/Nursing homes/
Tourism related projects
where cost of project
exceeds Rs. 45 lakhs 20 19.5 19 18.5
i) All term loans including composite loan scheme and term loans
under Single Window Scheme and SRTOs owning up to 2 vehicles.
b) Over Rs. 7,500 & up to Rs. 25,000 14.0 14.0 14.0 13.5
c) Over Rs. 25,000 & up to Rs. 2,00,000 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.0
d) Loans exceeding Rs. 2,00,000 to
a) SSI Units 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.0
b) Road Transport Operators 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5
ii) Loans above Rs. 2,00,000 sanctioned
under Equipment Refinance for SSI
units 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
133
b) Over Rs. 7,500 and upto Rs. 25,000 14.0 14.0 14.0 13.5
c) Over Rs. 25,000 and upto Rs. 2,00,000 17.0 17.0 17.0 16.5
d) Loans exceeding Rs. 2,00,000 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.0
TABLE 3.4
(w.e.f. 9.8.1993)
." per annum
per cent to 15 per cent, while 30.6 per cent of the credit
was offered at above 15 per cent and only 1 per cent of the
of small industries.
incentives.
industries"2
4.2 Commercial Bankk' Finance for the Development of Small-
Scale Industriclr.
4.2.1 COMMERCIAL B~ BEFORE NATIONALISATION:
Till the early ¥ears of the planned era, the portfolio
4
the small sector was 7.6 per cent whereas the large scale
4. Ibid.
140
TABLE - 4.1
~. Agriculture 67 1.17
Illustration - 4A
Trade 20.6%
142
TABLE - 4.2
14 Largest Banks
except SBI 1689 ~708 883 2669 542 1739
received only Rs. 127.2 crores (4.2 per cent of the total
TABLE - 4.3
July 1969.
February 1969. It could hardly work for six months when the
banks (20) foreign banks (17) Private Sector Banks (38) and
TABLE - 4.4
Total Advances
3037
Priority Advances
442
1969
Priority Advnnce5
7906
1980
Priorit.y Advance 8
39688
1990
Illustration ~ 4B
industrialists.
this field dates back to April 1956, when a pilot Scheme for
financing small scale industries was introduced.
objective response.
State Bank Group has come a long way from the day it
both short and medium term not only for acquisition of fixed
today. Among the other banks born in the State are State
and two other banks viz., Karnataka Bank Ltd .. and Vysya
Bank Ltd.
making them prime movers and pace setters for the socio-
extend their branch net work to the rural unbanked areas and
Lead Bank Scheme (1970), there has been a big leap forward
3375 new branches opened during the last two decades, more
Karnataka is analysed.
TABLE - 4.5
Illustration - 4C
800 ................................................................................................................................................ .
~oo ................................................................................................................................................ .
• 00 ............................................................................................................................................. .
o~cx~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
e~ 70 71 ~ 75 7. 76 7e 77 78 7~ 80 81 82 8:J 84 86 U 87 68 8~ ~ ~1
Years
160
TABLE - 4.6
DISTRICT-WISE FINANCIAl.. ASSISTNCE TO SSIs BY COMMERCIAL·
BANKS AS ON 31.3.1992
Assistance to
SSIs by Commercial
Sl. Name of Districts Banks-Outstanding % to Total
No. As on March 1992
(Rs. in Crores)
Illustration - 4D
~S::::/::;:::::::::::/\:j0?
• • • • • • • I
Ot.her . DiBt.B. (i ~ )
43.9%
163
TABLE - 4.7
Amount
(Rs. in Crores)
------------------------------------------------------------
S1- Advances outstanding % to
No. Name of the Banks under SSIs as on Total
March '92
Illustration - 4E
•••••• ~H-f"'t-'L
~•••••••••• 'f-t-~~+f'" oth~r Btm1m. 22. m
S.B1 II 6%
. ..............
.. .....
~~ ......
~""'.""'~HHHH~~~
.......~. • .... • • 'l+-l-Hf+I~~-++-+'
... ~···~HH44++++~HH~
............ ~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .~ f+l-Hf+I-++-++-++~
6.1~
fitm. 6.1~
S1lldioat..e Bank I 0 .4~
Indl. Coop. Bank 9.5~
166
as KSFC was established in the year 1959 under the SFCs Act,
167
by ropeway.
estates.
or maintenance thereof.
industrial activities.
169
(against subsidy).
171
concerns.
1. Technicians' scheme
areas.
173
TABLE - 4.8
TABLE - 4.9
TABLE - 4.10
Corporation.
1991-1992.
177
TABLE - 4.11
1. 1959-60 11 0.28
2. 1960-61 21 90.9 0.44 57.1
3. 1961-62 46 19.4 0.55 25.0
4. 1962-63 33 (-) 28.2 0.29 ( -) 47.2
5. 1963-64 38 15.1 0.68 134.48
6. 1964-65 49 28.9 1.11 63.2
7. 1965-66 59 20.4 1.49 34.21
8. 1966-67 44 ( -) 25.4 0.81 ( - ) 45.60
9. 1967-68 88 100.0 1.03 27.10
10. 1968-69 65 26.1 1.78 72.80
11. 1969-70 64 ( -) 1.5 1.64 ( -) 7.80
12. 1970-71 151 135.9 3.37 105.40
13. 1971-72 292 93.3 5.05 49.80
14. 1972-73 292 5.70 12.80
15. 1973-74 345 18.1 8.51 49.20
16. 1974-75 319 (-) 7.5 10.47 23.00
17. 1975-76 242 ( -) 24.1 9.66 ( -) 7.70
18. 1976-77 291 20.2 11.06 14.40
19. 1977-78 226 ( - ) 22.3 10.13 (-) 8.40
20. 1978-79 322 42.4 10.61 4.70
21. 1979-80 817 153.7 17.33 63.30
22. 1980-81 1022 25.0 21.17 22.10
23. 1981-82 1292 26.4 32.49 53.47
24. 1982-83 1871 44.8 43.78 34.70
25. 1983-84 2680 43.2 58.26 33.00
26. 1984-85 4002 49.3 75.62 29.70
27. 1985-86 4795 19.8 103.57 36.90
28. 1986-87 4910 2.3 111.79 7.90
29. 1987-88 5053 2.9 125.59 12.30
30. 1988-89 6178 22.2 144.66 15.10
31. 1989-90 7641 23.6 186.20 28.70
32. 1990-91 8284 8.4 250.89 34.70
33. 1991-92 10611 28.0 332.88 32.60
34. Sanctions
As on
31.3.92 62154 1588.88
Illustration - 4F
Trends in KSFC's Assistance (Number)
N
.~u=m~b=e=n~______________________________________________1
80..-
.co ................................................................................................................................................
80 ..................................... ,................................................................:......................................... .
0L---6g--~~-O~--~=~g=-~7=O~==~~~-~8~0----~8~g~-~QO~----~g~1~-:g~2~
Years
-+- No. 01 Urub
179
Illustration - 4G
2000~----------------------------------------------------'
1500 ................................................................................................................................................
1000 ................................................................................................................................................
500 .................................................................................................................................................
TABLE - 4.12
1959-60 11 0.28
1969-70 518 10.09
for the first time the sanctions have crossed Rs.100 Crore
1. Total Sanctions 5053 125.58 5984 140.99 7369 181.80 7898 243.10 10300 325.25 57684 1433.39
2. Sanctions to SSIs 4232 94.93 5078 106.72 6060 128.70 6185 166.97 7597 232.84 44751 987.68,
3. 2 as % of 1 83.75 75.59 84.85 75.69 82.23 69.14 78.31 68.68 73.75 71.58 77.57 68.90
Illustration - 48
KSFC's Sanctions to SSIs
Sanot. .t~
Non...~I
SalloW. to NonSS.. 12~
«5.71
'l2\BIE - 4.14
DIS'JRIC'l'-WISE ANALYSIS OF UlANS SAR:TIOOFD 'ID SSIs AS Cfi 31.3.1992
(Arrount Rs. in Crores)
I. BAC'IQIiARD DIS'IRICl'S
1. Bidar 1167 2.6 36.31 3.6
2. Mysore 3264 7.2 73.56 7.4
3. Dharwad 3871 8.6 66.75 6.7
4. Raichur 995 2.2 24.44 2.4
5. Be1gaum 3734 8.3 52.24 5.2
6. Bijapur 3637 8.1 22.31 2.2
7. Dakshina Kannada 2396 5.3 54.50 5.5
8. 'fumkur 3223 7.2 52.80 5.3
9. Gulbarga 1464 3.2 22.00 2.2
10. Uttara Kannada 788 1.7 11.58 1.1
11. Hassan 1114 2.4 17.73 1.7
-----------------------------------------
'lUI'AL - I 25653 59.32 434.42 43.98
-----------------------------------------
II. amm DIS'IRICl'S
1. Bangalore 8147 18.2 390.46 39.5
2. Shinoga 4519 10.0 27.68 2.8
3. Kolar 1058 2.3 34.02 3.4
4. Chi tradurga 1789 3.9 40.75 4.1
5. Mandya 1096 24.4 20.36 2.0
6. Chickrtaga1ur 700 1.5 7.09 0.7
7. Be11ary 1329 2.9 28.51 2.8
8. Kooagu 460 1.0 4.37 0.4
-----------------------------------------
TCYrAL - II 19098 42.67 553.26 56.01
-----------------------------------------
State Total 44751 100.00 987.68 100.00
Illustration - 4.1
TABLE - 4.15
industries.
189
Illustration -4J
Rubber 1.9%
14.6%
Textilers 6.9%
Chemical 8.3%
leering 14.1%
Elect. & Electronics 9.7%
_ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ~ _ . - . _ . - . _ _ ..... • .. _ _ ..... ~ .......... " ..................... L.L.JII ........ . I . ' U " '-- •
In the Table below KSFC's sanction during 1989-90 to 1991-92 and since inception upto 31.3.1992 (Constitution-
wise is presented :
TABLE - 4.16
Sanctions
Since Inception up to 31.3.1992
Sl. Type of 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92
No. Constitution
Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number ' t o Total Amount % of Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
I-'
1. Public Ltd. , Companies 41 11.11 20 8.39 18 6.30 367 0.63 65.73 4.58 1.0
2. Private Ltd. , Companies 355 59.79 411 82.35 346 84.64 3347 5.80 500.28 34.90 0
3. Partnership Concerns 714 39.02 958 58.97 1069 85.80 7214 12.50 334.28 23.32
4. Proprietary Concerns 6528 76.08 6892 100.78 9170 155.33 46563 80.72 527.45 36.79
5. Others (Co-operative
Societies and Joint
Hindu Family 3 0.20 3 0.39 8 0.80 193 0.33 5.65 0.39
TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7641 186.20 8284 250.88 10611 332.87 57684 100.00 1433.39 100.00
It can be seen from the above that in terms of number and amount more finance has been availed by the
proprietory concerns (as much as 80.72% interms of number and almost 37% in terms of amount). In terms of
of amount, Private Ltd., Companies have availed about 35% of the total amount sanctioned by the KSFC followed
by Partnership concerns to the extent of 23%. It can also be observed that the sanctions to Co-operative
Societies is very less. This is because these Societies can obtain finance along with concessions from
Governmental Agencies.
•••• 1 ~~ze w~se ana~ys~s .o~ KSFC operation
TABLE - 4.17
SIZE-WISB ANALYSIS OF TERM LOAR SANCTIONED (DURING 1990-91 TO 1991-92 AND AS ON 31.03.1992)
(Amount Rs. in Lakhs)
1. Upto Rs.0.50 lakhs 3531 865.36 4643 1074.21 28048 46.38 5305.66 3.98
2. Rs. 0.50 - Rs. 2.00 lakhs 1910 2426.77 2265 3097.43 17665 29.19 21032.11 15.80
3. Rs. 2.00 - Rs. 5.00 lakhs 1711 5330.15 2277 7491.36 9116 15.07 29503.98 22.17 .....
4. Rs. 5.00 - Rs. 7.50 lakhs 259 1647.99 313 1993.38 1959 3.23 12475.04 9.37 ~ .
5. Rs. 7.50 - Rs.I0.00 lakhs 263 2418.51 354 3185.23 1326 2.19 11712.81 8.80 .....
6. Rs.I0.00 - Rs.20.00 lakhs 160 2394.92 254 3608.17 1277 2.11 17588.38 13.22
7. Rs.20.00 - Rs.30.00 lakhs 96 2320.65 117 2803.18 661 1.09 14755.99 11.09
8. Rs.30.00 - Rs.45.00 lakhs 35 1308.10 50 1881.00 217 0.35 8114.96 6.09
9. Above Rs.45.00 lakhs 28 1782.38 61 4071.28 194 0.32 12552.77 9.43
Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------
7993 20494.83 10334 29205.24 60463 100.00 158888.19 100.00
Source : Annual Reports of KSFC for the years 1990-91 and 1991-92
It is clear from the above, that in terms of number, more sanctions are towards the loan
between Rs.0.50 lakhs to Rs.5.00 lakhs. But in terms of amount more finance is in the range of
Rs.I0.00 lakhs to Rs.45.00 lakhs and above Rs.45.00 lakhs.
192
TABLE - 4.18
TABLE - 4.19
RECOVERY PERFORMANCE OF THE KSFC DURING 1987-88 TO 1991-92
(Rs. in Crores)
security etc.
1~5
TABLE - 4.20
TRENDS IN RECOVERY DURING 1987-88 TO 1991-92
(Amount Rs.in Crores)
1. 1987-1988 75.48
TABLE - 4.21
Sl.
No.
Year
,
Default Ratio
1 1989-90 16.93
2 1990-91 18.80
3 1991-92 20.02
to SSIs is as follows :
Banks.
198
TABLE - 4.22
Karnataka.
199
Illustration - 4K
~
---" ....
...................
,
................. .
"-----
~ ....................... .
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••
...........................
: ............................ : ......... .:/." RRBs 68.3
~
~ ...........
....... :-/'/
......................../
~
.
106.96
KSFC 987.68
TABLE - 4.23
2 Investment do 1274.90
3 Exports do 105.44
sector.
201
"A Banker-a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the
sun is shining and wants it back the minute it begins to
institutional finance.
for survey those SSI units are selected which are promoted
late 1970's and 1980's have been selected so that the latest
for the field survey about their performance. The 100 units
selected for the survey are the samples from the following
types of SSIs.
turn over from Rs.IO lakhs to Rs.50 lakhs have been given
TABLE - 5.1
(Production)
1 < = 5 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 3
2. 6 - 10 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 1
3 . 11 - 15 0 6 1 1 0 0 1 1 2
4. 16 - 20 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0
5. 21 - 25 5 2 3 1 1 0 1 0 4
6. 26 - 30 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
7 . 31 - 40 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 . 41 - 50 0 1 1 1 1 O· 0 2 2
9 . 51 & 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 2
Above
computer.
follows:
209
: 1 ) Type of Promoter
(a) Below SSLC 9
(b) SSLC - 13
(c) Graduates - 24
(d) Post Graduates 7
( 2 ) Unit type
(a) Proprietory - 22
(b) Partnership 24
(3 ) Industry type
(a) Food - 15
(c) Chemical - 10
(d) Textiles 5
(e) Engineering - 14
( f ) Hotel 4
(g) Leather 5
(h) Rubber 4
( i ) Paper - 14
( j ) Others - 15
210
1 2 3 4
etc.
will not charge the taxes to the buyer and hence will
be selling at a lower rate. This will certainly affect
other means and also to know the source and the nature of
TABLE - 5.3
1. Open Market 30
2. Governmental Institution 17
3. Imported 21
4. Scarcity 32
per cent of units got their raw material through import. The
timely delivery.
219
TABLE - 5.4
1 Food 8 2 0 2 0
2 Ele. & Elect. 0 1 1 3 2
3 Chemicals 3 2 1 2 4
4 Textiles 5 3 1 1 10
5 Engineering 1 0 9 6 11
6 Hotel 8 14 4 1 0
7 Leather 9 0 7 2 3
8 Rubber 3 2 2 0 13
9 Paper 17 1 2 9 12
10 Others 2 2 19 10 17
articles.
220
they have problems with pricing i.e., to say they are not
Higher the BEP; lower will be the profit margins for the
Table - 5.5.
223
TABLE - 5.5
1. FOOD 05 01
2. ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS 04 02
3. CHEMICALS 04 04
4. TEXTILES 00 00
5. ENGINEERING 06 02
6• LEATHER 01 01
7. RUBBER 02 00
8. PAPER 02 01
9. OTHERS 03 02
TABLE - 5.6
1. FOOD 19 11 13 7 21 15 12
2. E & E 23 12 11 12 07 24 11
3. CHEMICALS 31 21 9 13 13 10 12
4. TEXTILES 20 13 19 10 11 14 13
5. ENGG. 28 10 1 10 22 19 10
6. HOTEL 13 13 0 41 1 11 0
7 • LEATHER 15 15 1 3 24 11 31
8. RUBBER 26 17 11 22 14 10 0
9. PAPER 21 10 10 31 10 17 10
10. OTHERS 10 11 9 11 22 26 11
TABLE - 5.7
RATIO OF EMPLOYMENT
6. LEATHER 88 86 1 · 1.02
7 RUBBER 31 10 1 · 3.10
8. PAPER 19 10 1
·· 1.90
capital facility. They provide term loan where they will get
units after obtaining term loan and the unit is put into
table below shows that of the surveyed units more loan has
been given to land and bulding and very less on plant and
have obtained the loan. More loan towards land and building
indicates that it is an un-productive expenditure whereas an
one.
TABLE - 5.8
1. FOOD 04 08 06 02
2. E &E 03 07 06 01
3. CHEMICALS 03 04 04 02
4. TEXTILES 04 05 05 01
5. ENGINEERING 03 03 10 04
6. HOTEL 02 04 01 00
7 LEATHER 02 04 05 01
8. RUBBER 01 02 03 02
9. PAPER 05 07 09 04
10. OTHERS 02 06 01 06
230
obtained less loan (i.e. within Rs.IO lakhs) and good number
of Engineering and Electrical and Electronics units have
availed more loan in the range of Rs. 40-60 lakhs. In the
TABLE - 5.9
1. PAPER 5 1 4 1
2. CHEMICALS 2 4 3 1
3. FOOD 8 3 2 2
4. RUBBER 1 1 0 1
5. LEATHER 1 3 1 0
7 ENGINEERING 1 6 4 3
8. HOTEL 0 1 2 1
9. TEXTILES 3 2 0 0
10. OTHERS 2 5 6 2
232
TABLE - 5.10
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROFILE (WORKING CAPITAL LOAN)
FOOD 03 08 01
TEXTILES 03 02 00
ENGINEERING 09 02 02
HOTEL 01 00 01
LEATHER 02 02 01
RUBBER 02 02 01
PAPER 08 03 03
OTHERS 10 03 02
TABLE - 5.11
1. FOOD 254
3. CHEMICALS 165
4. ENGINEERING 121
5. TEXTILES 338
6. HOTEL 141
7. LEATHER 133
8. RUBBER 180
234
TABLE - 5.12
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
post is required.
of an SSI unit.
with the penalty for default and thus leading the unit to
sickness.
interest in the range of 11-12 per cent and 15-16 per cent,
TABLE - 5.13
1. FOOD 1 1 8 5
2. ELE.& ELECT. 3 3 6 2
3. CHEMICALS 0 1 5 4
4. TEXTILES 1 3 0 1
5. ENGS. 2 5 6 1
6. HOTEL 0 0 3 1
7. LEATHER 1 1 1 2
8. RUBBER 1 02 0 1
9. PAPER 4 3 5 3
10. OTHERS 11 1 3 0
been given 83-92 months. The same can be seen from the table
below.
TABLE - 5.14
PROFILE OF REPAYMENT
1. FOOD 8 2 ·3 2
2. ELE.& ELECT. 4 5 3 2
3. CHEMICALS 2 3 2 1
4. TEXTILES 0 3 2 0
5. ENGINEERING 6 3 3 2
6. HOTEL 3 1 0 0
7. LEATHER 3 1 1 0
8. RUBBER 1 1 1 1
9. PAPER 3 2 5 4
243
project. The repayment period for the term loan varies from
~tCUtron
AM:XMl' NOJNT PMXJNl' AMXJNI'
SANCI'IONID RFXXNERED OOI'STANDIN:; DEFAULT
I~
AM){JNI' AM:XJNI' AM:XJm' AMJUNI'
SANCl'IONED REOJVERED OOI'STANDIK; DEFAULT
•
N-UJNT AM:XJNI'
f
AM:XJNT AlOJNT
SANCTIONED REXXNERED OlJI'STANDIN:; DEFAULT
For those units who have longer repayment periods will get
both principal and interest repayments on a quarterly basis.
as follows.
TABLE - 5.16
SL. INDUSTRY A B C D
NO. TYPE
1. Paper 10 4 I- I
2. Chemical 2 4 1 1
3. Food I- I 2 3
4. Rubber 5 3 0 1
5. Leather 2 4 1 1
7. Engg 1 1 2 2
8. Hotel 2 5 1 1
9. Textile 6 2 1 1
10. Other 2 1 1 1
institutions.
TABLE - 5.17
OVERALL EXPERIENCE WITH FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
1. FOOD 13 9 10
2. E & E 2 21 II
3. CHEMICALS 0 0 (1
4. TEXTILES 7 0 '11
5. ENGG. 1 3 F2
6. HOTEL 1 3 i4
7. LEATHER 1 0 '0
8. RUBBER 0 0 k9
9• PAPER 3 1 'I
10. OTHERS 4 2 -0
is bad.
2S2
a) Promoters' background
b) Industry-wise
c) Constitution-wise
d) Financial Institution-wise.
TABLE - 5.18
1. TECHNICAL 46
2. GRADUATES 24
3. S.S.L.C AND 22
BELOW S.S.L.C
4. POST GRADUATES 07
TABLE - 5.19
INDUSTRY-WISE ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION
1. Paper 11 0 1 1
2. Chemical 5 0 1 2
3. Food 1 6 2 3
4. Rubber 2 2 0 0
5. Leather 0 1 1 1
9. Textile 1 0 1 0
10. Others 3 5 1 1
implementation.
255
TABLE - 5.20
1. PROPRIETORY 7 1 2 5
2. PARTINERSHIP 9 2 7 3
3. PRIVATE LTD 11 7 12 11
4. PUBLIC LTD 1 o o 2
TABLE - 5.21
1. Paper 2 0 0 1
2. Leather 1 0 1 0
3. Textile 1 1 0 1
5. Food 7 0 4 1
6. Hotel 0 0 1 0
7. Engg 9 1 0 0
8. Rubber 5 0 0 1
9. Others 15 2 2 2
Tab1e-5.22.
257
TABLE - 5.22
INDUSTRY-WISE BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS
l. Paper 1 0 1 1 0 0
2. Chemical 4 0 3 2 3 1
3. Food 4 2 1 3 0 1
4. Rubber 2 1 1 1 1 1
5. Leather 1 0 1 1 0 0
7. Engg 9 2 1 0 2 1
8. Hotel 0 0 0 1 0 0
9. Textile 2 0 0 1 0 0
10. Others 8 1 2 2 1 0
TABLE - 5.23
CONSTITUTION-WISE BREAK EVEN ANALYSIS
SL. INDUSTRY < 34% 34-45% 66-55% 56-65% 66-75% 76-85% 85-98%
NO. GROUP
1. Proprietry 3 2 2 o 3 '0 2
2. Partnership 1 7 3 o 1 1 I
3. Private Ltd 5 9 4 9 2 1 1
4. Public Ltd 2 1 o 9 2 2 o
TABLE - 5.24
1. PROPERIETORY 2 1 4 3 9
2. PARTNERSHIP . 2 3 2 7
3. PRIVATE 3 0 1 1 4
4. PUBLIC LTD 5 6 5 7 8
259
project cost.
260
KSFC was established in the year 1959. More than 50 per cent
country. KSFC has been rated as the best SFC in the country
21 months.
261
TABLE - 5.25
1. K.S.F.C 10
2. COMMERCIAL BANK 18
3. OTHER F.I'S 21
provided to SSIs.
TABLE - 5.26
1. K.S.F.C 5 10 15 07 7
2. COMMERCIAL
BANKS 9 5 2 2 1
3. OTHER
F.I'S 4 5 3 o
262
TABLE - 5.27
1. PROPRIETORY 21» 4 1
2. PARTNERSHIP as 4 "1
TABLE - 5.28
ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRY-WISE SOURCE OF FUNDS
1. FOOD 5 3 1
2. E & E 3 0 0
3• CHEMICALS 7 0 1
4 TEXTILES 2 0 0
5. ENGINEERING 9 2 ·1
6. HOTEL 2 0 0
7. LEATHER 2 0 0
8. RUBBER 5 1 0
9. PAPER 2 0 0
10. OTHER 11 8 6
TABLE - 5.29
SL. FINANCIAL
NO. INSTITUTIONS UPTO 10% 11-12% 13-14% 15-16% ABOVE 16%
1. K S F C 4 7 22 5 4
2. COMMERCIAL
BANKS 13 5 4 2 9
3. OTHER
F.I'S 1 2 5 8 3
TABLE - 5.30
1. FOOD 10 3
2. E & E 08 1
3. ENGINEERING 09 4
4. PAPER 07 3
5. CHEMICALS 07 2
6. TEXTILES 03 2
7. LEATHER 02 1
8. HOTEL 04 0
9. RUBBER 03 1
10. OTHERS 06 2
TABLE - 5.31
1. PROPERIETORY 19 5 26
2. PARTNERSHIP 14 4 29
3. PRIVATE LTD 07 3 43
4. PUBLIC LTD 20 7 35
institutions.
268
TABLE - 5.32
1. K.S.F.C 50 6 0 2
2. COMMERCIAL BANKS 18 4 1 0
3. OTHER F.I.S 1 0 0 0
institutions.
270
TABLE - 5.33
ANALYSIS OF OVERALL EXPERIENCE (INSTITUTION-WISE)
1. K.S.F.C 15 42 1
2. COMMERCIAL BANKS 2 15 1
3. OTHER F.I.S o 1 o
The SSI units selected for the field survey are based
limited company'.
271
Hotel etc. Due care has been taken while selecting the unit
for the field survey to see that all the major industrial
groups are represented. The units situated in Bangalore,
Mysore and Hubli have been selected for "the survey.
technically qualified.
raw-materials.
financial institutions.
financial institutions.
and quality.
ANNEXURE 1
GENERAL :
Phone No.
5. Previous Occupation ·
6. Year of establishment of
the unit ·
7. Constitution of the Unit Proprietary/partnership/
Private Ltd.,/Pub1ic Ltd.
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
c) Restrictions
in importing Yes/No
d) Seasonal
Availability Yes/No
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
277
2. Date of sanction
3. Date of Realisation of
Loan (complete Disbur-
sement of Loan)
institution is providing
working capital facility Yes/No
b) Reception of the
officers towards the
project was not en-
couraging Yes/No
d) Inordinate delay in
clearance .: Yes/No
SUMMARY
front.
economy.
also dealt.
283
SSIs over the years. The thesis also deals with the present
sector.
banks.
284
cent.
in running the unit. It was also found out during the field
RECOMMENDATIONS:
to the other.
SSIs. This will help new units for speedy sanction and
direction.
55! units however get only around 8 per cent. Hence, the
no further nationalisation,
financial environment,
rural areas.
small-scale entrepreneurs.
291
'priority sector'.
BOO K S:
ARTICLES: