Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Demonstrate how an interest rate swap can be used to convert a floating-rate (fixed-rate) loan to a
fixed-rate (floating-rate) loan
They change the nature of interest payments for assets and liabilities.
Remember when we discussed this in 23f?
No. Anyway, who would want to do that? And how would they do it?
Companies often borrow at the Prime Rate, which is a floating rate. And they don't like that.
They would prefer to borrow at a fixed rate.
They just do. It's what the curriculum says, so don't question it. But if you really want to know
why, see 29b.
If a company borrows at LIBOR + 2% but would prefer to borrow at a fixed rate, it can enter a an
interest rate swap to pay a dealer a 5% fixed rate and receive LIBOR in return, the net interest
payments are 5% + 2%.
That's a lot of numbers. What's the net effect?
Look at what the company pays out: LIBOR plus 2% on its original loan, and another 5% to the
swaps dealer.
Right...
And the company gets a payment of LIBOR from the swaps dealer.
Right...
So, LIBOR goes out, but LIBOR comes back in. What's left?
And...
Interest rate swaps have a duration? I thought only bonds had a duration.
Think of an interest rate swap's duration as being the net effect of the durations on the
underlying bonds.
The
duration of an interest rate swap is simply the duration of the asset less the duration of the liability.
How am I supposed to remember that a pay-floating position has a positive duration and the pay fixed
position has a negative duration?
Duration of pay-floating swap position = Long fixed rate 0.75 - Short floating rate 0.15 = 0.60
Explain the effect of an interest rate swap on an entity’s cash flow risk
So, a company that has issued floating-rate debt goes to a dealer and gets a pay-fixed interest rate
swap. Everyone's a winner, right?
Not exactly. It's true that the accountants and people who care about cash flow planning are
happy because now the company's interest payments are locked in.
"Locked in"? As in, they've hedged rid of the company's cash flow risk. So, bonuses for the
accountants?
Which is?
Entering the pay-fixed swap has hedged cash flow risk, sure. But there are other types of risk.
Such as? And anyway, we just hedged one type of risk so quit knocking us.
But to accomplish that, you've massively increased the duration of a company's liabilities
(see 29a), which is great if interest rates rise...
EXACTLY! If interest rates rise, the hedge is saving the company money that it otherwise would have
been spending on higher interest payments.
Oh, I hadn't thought of that. So all the companies that issued floating rate debt are happy because
their interest payments are lower. And the market value of these companies increases.
Yes
Yes
Yes
So, entering a pay-fixed swap involves a trade-off between credit risk and market value risk?
Determine the notional principal value needed on an interest rate swap to achieve a desired level of
duration in a fixed-income portfolio
Example
NP = $250m
NOTE: Assume that a fixed-rate bond has a duration that is 75% of its maturity (this is a dickish question,
they will almost certainly just give you the swap duration on the exam)
1-year swap with monthly payments: MDUR = (1/12 x 0.5) - (1y fixed x 0.75) = -0.708
2-year swap with semi-annual payments (MDUR = (1/2 x 0.5) - (2y fixed x 0.75) = -1.25
NP required using 1-year swap = (4.50 - 5.50)/(-0.708) x $250m = $353m
So, to lower portfolio duration without an insanely high NP, go with 2-year semi-annual pay-fixed,
receive floating interest rate swap.
- Structured rate notes have special leverage-like features that allow its interest rate to move at a
multiple of the market rate
- Insurers and pension funds like these because they have option-like features, but regulators allow
them because they are technically considered fixed-income securities
Explain how a company can generate savings by issuing a loan or bond in its own currency and using a
currency swap to convert the obligation into another currency
Remind me again why it's cheaper to borrow C$ and covert these into ₩ using a currency swap.
You remember the part about how Canadian lenders will offer a lower interest rate because
they have better knowledge of and higher trust in a domestic company?
Yes.
So that explains part of it. Also, by entering a swap, the company is lowering its borrowing cost
by accepting some credit risk.
How so?
If it simply issues debt, the company is not accepting any credit risk. Rather, its lenders are
accepting credit risk.
Yes.
But by entering a swap, the company accepts the credit risk posed by the counterparty.
So it the counterparty goes bankrupt and can't make interest payments or return the principal, the
company is in trouble.
That's right. Which is another reason why the net interest rate on a borrow C$ plus swap
strategy are lower compared to just directly borrowing ₩.
Sure, but if the counterparty is a bank, what are the chances that it's going to go bankrupt?
If a Canadian company needs 120m Won (₩), why wouldn't it just issue Won-denominated bonds?
It could, but the interest rate on its Won-denominated bonds would be higher than what it
could borrow at in Canada because Korean investors don't know it as well.
Well, it could start by issuing a bond for C$60m at, say, 7.0%.
Stick with me. To borrow ₩120m directly, Korean investors would charge a interest rate of, say,
7.75%.
Those jerks. That's higher than the 7.0% interest rate that Canadian investors would charge. The
company should just borrow in Canada at 7.0%.
Tempting, but it still needs to get its hands on ₩120m. So, it starts by issuing C$60m of 7.0%
bonds. Because the exchange rate is C$0.50/₩, this C$60m is equal to ₩120m.
Yes. The company enters something called a Currency Swap. The counterparty is usually a bank
- probably even a bank that it has an ongoing business relationship with, so there's a lot more
there's a higher level of trust compared to borrowing directly from Korean investors.
And it avoids having to borrow at 7.75% from those jerky Korean investors.
Yes, although the Canadian bankers are probably also jerks. But anyway, the company takes the
C$60m that it has just raised at 7.0% from Canadian investors and gives it to the currency swap
counterparty.
That's stupid. The company raises C$60m and just gives it away?
Sort of. The next part of the currency swap involves exchanging interest payments. The
company agrees to pay a rate of 7.25% on its ₩120m to the bank, which agrees to pay a back a
rate of 6.85% on the C$60m.
Wait, they pay 7.25% and get back 6.85%. This sounds like a bad deal.
Think about the overall cash flows. Here's what happens every time an interest payment is due
(say once a year):
The company pays C$4.2m to its bondholders (C$60m x 7.0%) and ₩8.7m to the swap
counterparty (₩120m x 7.25%)
But it gets C$4.11m from its swap counterparty (C$60m x 6.85%)
So the net payment is ₩8.7m plus C$0.09m, which is the equivalent of paying 7.25% +
0.15%, or 7.4%
Q: What does a company do if it has converted the nature of its interest payments from floating to fixed
by entering a pay-fixed currency swap, but believes that interest rates are going to drop?
A: The company can accomplish this by entering a separate pay-floating swap contract. The
counterparty to this new contract can be another swaps dealer or it could even enter into a second
swap contract with its current counterparty.
I get that they pay 7.25% to the swap counterparty for the ₩120m, but where does the extra 0.15%
come from?
They are borrowing C$60m at 7.0%, but only getting paid 6.85% from their swap counterparty.
Yes.
I guess. Hey, one more question. Why are North Korean investors such jerks?
Demonstrate how a firm can use a currency swap to convert a series of foreign cash receipts into
domestic cash receipts
Related LOSs
NOTE: Unlike other swaps, the counterparties do NOT exchange notional principal in this type of
transaction.
NP = Notional Principal
FC = Foreign Currency
DC = Domestic Currency
29g Swaps: Portfolio diversificaion using equity swaps
Explain how equity swaps can be used to diversify a concentrated equity portfolio, provide international
diversification to a domestic portfolio, and alter portfolio allocations to stocks and bonds
Like all swaps, equity swaps involve counterparties trading returns on an agreed notional
principal
What makes them equity swaps is that at least one of these returns is linked to equity (either an
individual stock or an index)
Equity swaps provide a low-cost way for investors to temporarily adjust their equity exposure
without having to sell any assets
But remember, if you want your exposure adjusted beyond the swap's expiry date, you'll need
to enter into a new one (and terms offered at that time might not be as attractive)
How can equity swaps help diversify a portfolio with a concentrated position?
Individuals or Institutions with concentrated portfolios may want to diversify, but still wish to
retain control of their shares
In an equity swap, the counterparties agree on a notional principal and trade the returns on
their holdings
Swap example: A has a concentrated position in XYZ, so it enters a swap B in exchange for the
return on the S&P 500 for the same period
If XYZ return < S&P 500 return, A "wins" because its cash flow from the swap are net positive
If XYZ return > S&P 500 return, A "loses" because its cash flows from the swap are net negative
But whether A "wins" or "loses" on their swap in a given period
1) Its portfolio is more diversified than it was without the swap, and
2) It did not have to sell its position in the stock of its benefactor's company
When would an investor want to use a equity swap? What are the potential drawbacks in each
situation?
An investor can gain exposure a foreign market by entering a swap of the return on the
domestic index for the return on the foreign market's index
DRAWBACK: The investor must accept currency risk
DRAWBACK: If your portfolio doesn't perfectly match the domestic index, the investor is
exposed to tracking error
An endowment with investments that are heavily concentrated in the stock of its benefactor's
company can change its risk profile to that of a diversified portfolio
DRAWBACK: If the foundation must pay return that is significantly higher than the one it
receives, it may need to sell some of its portfolio, which is exactly what it was trying to
avoid in the first place (see 14i)
A portfolio manager can alter its relative exposure to equities compared to bonds by swapping
the S&P 500 return for LIBOR
DRAWBACKS: Cash flow risk & Tracking error (as described above)
An entrepreneur (see 12d) or employee (see 8c) with high concentrations of wealth in own
company stock can diversify their portfolio
DRAWBACK: Executive's control may become disproportionately large compared to
his/her share of cash flows
DRAWBACK: There may be tax consequences for an entrepreneur seeking to diversify a
concentrated position in low basis stock if authorities consider a transaction to be an
effective sale
Demonstrate the use of an interest rate swaption 1) to change the payment pattern of an anticipated
future loan and 2) to terminate a swap.
Recall that a swap is composed of a series of forward contracts, so its payoffs are symmetric
Therefore, parties to swap contracts assume a higher level of risk compared to holders
of options contracts (which have asymmetric payoffs)
Interest rate swaptions are named with respect to the fixed-rate:
The buyer of a payer swaption receives the right enter an interest rate swap as the
fixed-rate payer
The buyer of a receiver swaption receives the right to enter an interest rate swap as
fixed-rate receiver
An investor considering a interest rate swap can reduce his/her risk exposure by purchasing an
interest rate swaption, which provides the right to enter a swap if the conditions are right at the
time of exercis, but not the obligation to do so if the conditions are not right
Of course, as with options, the buyer of an interest rate swap must pay a premium for
this asymmetric payoff (ie. the right to walk away)
If a company enters a swap, it can also enter a swaption contract as an insurance policy that can
be used if its position in the original swap goes horribly wrong