Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. JUDICIAL REVIEW
Requisites
Tiojanco, Bryan Dennis G., Stilted Standards of Standing, the
Transcendental Importance Doctrine, and the Non-Preclusion
Policy They Prop, 86 PHIL. L.J. 606 (2012)
Interpretation
Tiojanco & San Juan, Importing Proportionality Through
Legislation: A Philippine Experiment, PROPORTIONALITY IN
ASIA, Cambridge University Press (pending review)
Unconstitutionality; Effect
Planters Products Inc. v. Fertiphil Corporation, G.R. No. 166006,
14 March 2008
Araullo v. Aquino III, G.R. No. 209287, 1 July 2014
II. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES
National Territory
Article I
Article XII, §2
Principles
III. CITIZENSHIP
Article IV
Republic Act No. 8171 (1995)
Republic Act No. 9225 (2003)
Go v. Republic of the Philippines, G.R. No. 202809, 2 July 2014
Tecson v. Commission on Elections, G.R. No. 161434, 3 March
2004
Bengzon III v. HRET, G.R. No. 142840, 7 May 2001
Poe-Llamanzares v. Commission on Elections, 8 March 2016
Coquilla v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 151914, 31 July 2002
Mercado v. Manzano, 307 SCRA 630
Labo v. COMELEC, 176 SCRA 1 (1989)
Frivaldo v. COMELEC, 257 SCRA 727 (1996)
Sobejana-Condon v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 198742, 10 August 2012
IV. SUFFRAGE
Article V
Republic Act No. 9189, as amended by R.A. No. 10590
Gallego v. Vera, 73 Phil. 453 (1941)
Romualdez v. RTC, 226 SCRA 408, 415 (1993)
AKBAYAN v. COMELEC, 355 SCRA 318 (2001)
Ceniza v. COMELEC, 95 SCRA 703 (1980)
Gonzales v. COMELEC, G.R. No. L-40117, 22 February 1975
Macalintal v. COMELEC, 405 SCRA 614 (2003)
Inherent Powers of the State: Police Power, Taxation & Eminent Domain
Rubi v. Provincial Board, 39 Phil. 660 (1919)
Agustin v. Edu, 88 SCRA 195 (1979)
People v. Siton, 600 SCRA 476
Mactan Cebu International Airport Authority v. Marcos, G.R. No.
120082, 11 September 1996
Gerochi v. Department of Energy, G.R. No. 159796, 17 July 2007
Eslaban, Jr. v. De Onorio, G.R. No. 146602, 28 June 2001
Telecommunications and Broadcast Attorneys of the Philippines
v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 132922, 21 April 1998
V. LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT
Article VII, §17– Power of Control and the Take Care Clause
Villena v. Secretary of Interior, G.R. No. L-46570, 21 April 1939
Gonzales III v. Office of the President, G.R. No. 196231, 4
September 2012 & 28 January 2014
Buklod ng Kawaning EIIB v. Zamora, G.R. No. 142801, 10 July
2001
Article IX
Funa v. COA Chairman, G.R. No. 192791, 24 April 2012
Funa v. Civil Service Commission, G.R. No. 191672, 25 November
2014
Medalla v. Sto. Tomas, 208 SCRA 351
Francisco v. Commission on Elections, G.R. No. 230249, 24 April
2018
Funa v. Manila Economic and Cultural Office, G.R. No. 193462, 4
February 2014
Philippine Airlines v. COA, 245 SCRA 39
Petitioner-Organization v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 147036,
10 April 2012
Gamogamo v. PNOC Shipping and Transit Corporation, 381
SCRA 742
Lumanta v. NLRC, 170 SCRA 79
Article X
Republic Act No. 11054 or the Bangsamoro Organic Law
Disomangcop v. DPWH Secretary, G.R. No. 149848, 25
Novermber 2004
Legaspi v. City of Cebu, G.R. No. 159110, 10 December 2013
Demaala v. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 199752, 17 February
2015
Rama v. Moises, G.R. No. 197146, 6 December 2016
Cong. Mandanas v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 199808, 3 July
2018
Article XI
San Juan & Tiojanco, Impeachment, Max Planck Encyclopedia of
Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford Constitutional Law (2016)
Article XVII
Del Rosario v. COMELEC, 35 SCRA 367
Imbong v. COMELEC, 35 SCRA 28
Lambino v. COMELEC,
Occena v. Commission, 104 SCRA 1
Gonzales v. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 774
Tan v. Macapagal, 43 SCRA 677
Sanidad v. COMELEC, 73 SCRA 33
Tolentino v. COMELEC, 41 SCRA 702
Javellana v. Executive Secretary, 50 SCRA 30