Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By:
Acio, Glaiza
Del Rosario, Joyce
Rico, Charlie
A merger between Northern Airlines and Southeast Airlines had been consummated
to create the fourth largest U.S. carrier, North-South Airline. The merged company inherited,
as part of its assets, an aging fleet of Boeing 737-200 aircraft. North-South Airlines is
headed by the new president and chairman, Stephen Ruth, who deems that the company
should manage its maintenance costs in order to ensure the liquidity of the company. This is
because maintenance costs rise along with the aging of the aircrafts. However, it is noted
that there has been a significant difference in the reported maintenance costs, both in the
airframe and engine areas, between Northern Airlines and Southeast Airlines, with the latter
having a newer fleet. Vice president for operations and maintenance, Peg Young, had been
assigned to study the issue and determine if there is a correlation/relationship between the
average fleet age and maintenance costs (airframe and engine).
It is commonly believed that in the airline industry, maintenance costs rise along with
the aging of aircrafts. It has also been observed by Stephen Ruth that the there is a
significant difference in the reported maintenance costs of B737-200 aircrafts of North
Airlines and Southeast Airlines. This case study was made to address the matter and
determine the following:
Stephen Ruth noted that creating a financially solid company necessitates managing its
maintenance costs since such expenses are believed to rise along with the aging of the
aircrafts. Maintenance costs are assumed to be composed of labor costs and replacement
materials required to perform repairs, modification, restoration, inspection and
troubleshooting tasks. If correlation between age and maintenance costs will not be strongly
proven, it will be assumed that there are other factors affecting such expenses (e.g. lack of
care, lack of preventive measures/inspection).
Since Southeast Airlines brings forth newer fleet of Boeing 737-200 tp the merged company,
it is assumed that the company is somehow “younger”, in terms of establishment, than
Northern Airlines. Also, it is assumed that low level management, including operations and
maintenance, is separate for Northern and Southeast Airlines.
It is assumed that the company currently does not use forecasting techniques and other
methods to budget their maintenance costs. Hence, the company only measures or
accounts for the maintenance costs once these are actually incurred.
4.1 Marketing
The Marketing Department must be responsible for advertising and selling company’s
product. TO gain more customer and generate higher sales, the company should provide
perks like creating an entertaining in-flight experience with features lie in-seat system that
play current TV shows, music, games or movies. Also providing, promo flights like piso-fare
promotion, so customers will encourage to book flights in the company.
4.2 Operations
The Operation Department must focus on the evaluation of maintenance procedure of the
two airlines. We believe that the older the aircraft is, the more maintenance it should have.
Since the Southeast Airlines has newer fleet, the company may focus on the emergency
repairs while Northern Airlines may focus their attention in preventive maintenance.
4.3 Finance
The Finance Department should focus on the expenses/cost for maintenance care of the
aircrafts. They should also consider in buying new aircrafts for the customers be safe during
flights.
4.4 HR
The Human Resource Department should hire employees who has expertise in managing
aircraft.
4.5 MIS/IT/R&D
The IT Department is responsible for maintaining the company’s information system. The
integrated information system (software) enables the operation department to keep track on
their sales and information of their clients.
V. Analysis
Strength Weakness
2. The merged company owns a relatively 2. The company's primary operating assets,
large fleet of aircraft. aircraft (Boeing 737-200), are subject to
aging.
Opportunities Threats
NORTHERN AIRLINES
AIRCRAFT MAINFRAME
Total
Average Age Maintenance
(Hours) Costs
x y xy x^2 y^2
6,512 51.8 337,321.60 42,406,144.00 2,683.24
8,404 54.92 461,547.68 70,627,216.00 3,016.21
11,077 69.7 772,066.90 122,699,929.00 4,858.09
11,717 68.9 807,301.30 137,288,089.00 4,747.21
13,275 63.72 845,883.00 176,225,625.00 4,060.24
15,215 84.73 1,289,166.95 231,496,225.00 7,179.17
18,390 78.74 1,448,028.60 338,192,100.00 6,199.99
84,590 472.51 5,961,316.03 1,118,935,328.00 32,744.15
b 0.0026
a 36.08
Simple Regression f = 36.08 + 0.0026t
NORTHERN AIRLINES
ENGINE
Total
Average Age Maintenance
(Hours) Costs
x y xy x^2 y^2
6,512 43.49 283,206.88 42,406,144.00 1,891.38
8,404 38.58 324,226.32 70,627,216.00 1,488.42
11,077 51.48 570,243.96 122,699,929.00 2,650.19
11,717 58.72 688,022.24 137,288,089.00 3,448.04
13,275 45.47 603,614.25 176,225,625.00 2,067.52
15,215 50.26 764,705.90 231,496,225.00 2,526.07
18,390 79.6 1,463,844.00 338,192,100.00 6,336.16
84,590 367.6 4,697,863.55 1,118,935,328.00 20,407.77
Correlation Coefficient 0.7825924937 Strong Correlation
Check 0.7825924937 Strong Correlation
b 0.0026
a 21.10
Simple Regression f = 21.1 + 0.0026t
SOUTHEAST AIRLINES
AIR FRAME
Total
Average Age Maintenance
(Hours) Costs
x y xy x^2 y^2
5,107 13.29 67,872.03 26,081,449.00 176.62
8,145 25.15 204,846.75 66,341,025.00 632.52
7,360 32.18 236,844.80 54,169,600.00 1,035.55
5,773 31.78 183,465.94 33,327,529.00 1,009.97
7,150 25.34 181,181.00 51,122,500.00 642.12
9,364 32.78 306,951.92 87,684,496.00 1,074.53
8,259 35.56 293,690.04 68,211,081.00 1,264.51
51,158 196.08 1,474,852.48 386,937,680.00 5,835.83
b 0.0032
a 4.62
Simple Regression f = 4.62 + 0.0032t
SOUTHEAST AIRLINES
ENGINE
Total
Average Age Maintenance
(Hours) Costs
x y xy x^2 y^2
5,107 18.86 96,318.02 26,081,449.00 355.70
8,145 31.55 256,974.75 66,341,025.00 995.40
7,360 40.43 297,564.80 54,169,600.00 1,634.58
5,773 22.1 127,583.30 33,327,529.00 488.41
7,150 19.69 140,783.50 51,122,500.00 387.70
9,364 32.58 305,079.12 87,684,496.00 1,061.46
8,259 38.07 314,420.13 68,211,081.00 1,449.32
51,158 203.28 1,538,723.62 386,937,680.00 6,372.57
b 0.0041
a (0.92)
Simple Regression f = -0.92 + 0.0041t
As shown in the computations above, for northern airlines, average fleet age has a
very strong positive correlation with direct airframe maintenance costs. Also, it is observed
that 77% of the variability in airframe maintenance costs is explainable by changes in
average fleet age. In other words, the primary predictor for direct airframe maintenance
costs of Northern Airlines is average fleet age. On the other hand, average fleet age has a
strong positive correlation with direct engine maintenance costs. Also, it is observed that
61% of the variability in airframe maintenance costs is explainable by changes in average
fleet age. In other words, the primary predictor for direct engine maintenance costs of
Northern Airlines is average fleet age.
For Southeast Airlines, average fleet age has a strong positive correlation with direct
airframe maintenance costs. However, it is observed that only 39% of the variability in
airframe maintenance costs is explainable by changes in average fleet age. In other words,
there are other factors, other than average fleet age, that affects variability in airframe
maintenance costs. Additionally, average fleet age has a strong positive correlation with
engine airframe maintenance costs. However, it is observed that only 46% of the variability
in airframe maintenance costs is explainable by changes in average fleet age. In other
words, there are other factors, other than average fleet age, that affects variability in engine
maintenance costs.
A significant difference is noted between the coefficient of determination of average
fleet age and maintenance costs between Northern and Southeast Airlines with the latter
only garnering 39% and 46% coefficients for airframe and engine maintenance costs,
respectively. This means that for Southeast Airlines, age is not the primary variable that
affects maintenance costs. This may arise from the difference in level of care between the
two companies.
VI. Alternative Courses of Actions Commented [2]: miniminum of 4 accdg to sir jubac
indicate advantages and disadvantages
Commented [3]: Nakatable nga pala to. Baka lang
maguluhan kayo pag nag-edit
1 To purchase a new fleet of Boeing 737 200 and sell their aging fleet.
Advantages
a The company will not be concerned about their aging fleet because these
will be sold and the newly purchased fleet will be used for operations.
b Maintenance costs to be incurred will start at minimal amounts since the
fleet is brand new.
Disadvantages
a It costs too much capital to purchase a new fleet. The company may incur
large loans for this course of action.
b There can be an absence of potential buyer/s for the aging fleet.
c Purchasing a new fleet of aircraft may mean purchasing the newest
airplane models. New models require new replacement parts and different
procedures for repairs and maintenance.
2 To manage and budget maintenance costs through forecasting. In this alternative, the
company will first forecast the average age of the fleet per succeeding years through
linear trend because as the years go by, the age of the fleet increases in a trend.
Next, the company will compute the average maintenance costs through the simple
regression equation computed previously (please refer to 5.2 Computational
Analysis).
Advantages
a Since budgeted maintenance costs will be forecasted, the company can set
aside ample funds for the maintenance costs whilst reserving other funds
for other operational activity.
b No cash outflows will be incurred when forecasting procedures will be
incurred unlike the previous alternative to buy a new fleet.
c Through forecasting, it can be predicted on which future year the company
would incur excessive maintenance costs that can no longer be sustained.
This will give an indication as to when the company should sell some of its
aircrafts and purchase new ones.
Disadvantages
a Forecasting through linear trend and simple regression (associative
forecasting similar to linear trend) only works validly if the given variables
are highly correlated with each other.
3 Retain the company's current policy on maintenance costs. It is assumed that the
company currently does not use forecasting techniques and other methods to budget
their maintenance costs. Hence, the company only measures or accounts for the
maintenance costs once these are actually incurred.
Advantages
a Since no new procedure will be introduced, the company will not
experience any resistance to change from its employees.
Disadvantage
a No funds are set aside for maintenance costs. Money for operational costs
and maintenance costs are commingled.
4 Hire a contractor that standardize the care of aircrafts all throughout North-South Commented [4]: Please add 4th alternative. minimum
Airlines. of 4 daw according to sir Jubac.
Advantages
a This may not be endangered the safety of their passengers as due to
possible aircraft failure.
Disadvantage
a Additional expenses for the company.
Alternatives Advantages Disadvantages Total Commented [5]: Sir Jubac said that weights should be
given on to weigh each alternative. What I did is based
1. Purchase a new fleet 2 3 -1 on the number of advantages and disadvantages.
Higher weight = recommendation.
2. Use forecasting to manage 3 1 2
and budget maintenance costs
3. Retain current 1 1 0
policy/procedures on
maintenance
4. Hire a contractor that 1 1 0 Commented [6]: Please add alternative 4 and its
standardize the care of aircrafts corresponding weights
VII. Action Plans
It is observed that under Northern Airlines, average fleet age exhibits very strong
correlation to direct airframe maintenance costs and strong correlation to engine
maintenance costs. Meanwhile, under Southeast Airlines, average fleet age has a strong
correlation to both airframe and engine maintenance costs. However, Southeast Airlines
garnered a coefficient of determination of 39% and 46% for airframe and engine
maintenance costs, respectively. This means that only 39% to 46% of the variability of
maintenance costs is explainable by the changes in average fleet age. Therefore, fleet age
is not the primary predictor or Northern Airlines has a higher level of care to its fleet since
age is the primary factor that affects maintenance costs. Meanwhile, Southeast Airlines has
a lower level of care to its aircrafts because it is deemed that a lot of other factors aside from
age are influencing the amount of maintenance costs incurred. This is because of the
separate low level management, including maintenance, for Northern and Southeast
Airlines. With this analysis, the following activities are planned as a solution to the
problem:influencer of maintenance costs for Southeast Airlines. Since the difference of
coefficient of determination between Northern and Southeast airlines are significant, it can
be concluded that there is a difference in the level of care given by the two companies to its
fleets of aircraft.
IX. Conclusion
Overall, it would seem that Northern Airline has the smallest variance in maintenance costs,
indicating that the day-to-day management of maintenance is working pretty well.
Maintenance costs seem to be more a function of airline than of airframe. Age. The airframe
and engine maintenance costs for South Airlines are not only lower but more nearly similar
than those for Northern Airline, butt, from the graph at least, appear to be rising more sharply
with age. From a overall perspective, it appears that South Airline may perform more efficiently
on sporadic or emergency repairs and North Airline may place more emphasis on preventive
maintenance.