Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
net/publication/238192639
CITATIONS READS
7 1,838
6 authors, including:
S. Saibabu N. Lakshmanan
CSIR Structural Engineering Research Centre CSIR Structural Engineering Research Centre
16 PUBLICATIONS 38 CITATIONS 190 PUBLICATIONS 965 CITATIONS
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by S. Saibabu on 10 October 2016.
Abstract: This paper presents the details of an innovative external prestressing technique for strengthening of prestressed concrete
girders. The technique has been developed for anchoring the external prestressing to the sides of the end block. In the proposed technique,
transfer of external force is in shear mode on the end block and the required transverse prestressing force is smaller compared to
conventional techniques. In order to validate the technique, an experimental investigation has been carried out on two posttensioned end
blocks 共EB-1 and EB-4兲. Steel brackets are provided on either side of the end block for transferring external prestressing force and these
are connected to the anchor blocks by expansion-type anchor bolts. Performance of the end blocks has been studied for design, cracking,
and ultimate loads. A ductile failure is observed in EB-1 whereas a sudden failure is observed in EB-4. The slip and slope of the steel
bracket have been recorded at various stages during the experiment. These values are found to be smaller in EB-1 than in EB-4 due to a
higher anchorage depth of bolts. Finite-element analysis has been carried out by simulating the geometry, loading, material nonlinearity,
and test conditions. Linear and nonlinear static analysis has been conducted for the specified loadings and the responses have been
compared. From the analysis, it has been observed that the computed slope and slip of the steel bracket are in good agreement with the
corresponding experimental observations.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲1084-0680共2009兲14:2共90兲
CE Database subject headings: Prestressed concrete; Prestressing; Finite element method; Slopes; Slip; Concrete structures.
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
Tendon
Steel Bracket
Tendon
Expansion-type
Anchor bolts
Concrete Bracket
Prestressed Concrete and Block
Tendon
A posttensioned “I” beam of effective span 5 m 共16 ft, 5 in.兲 with
M45 concrete grade is designed. The depth of the beam is
Through-Bolts
650 mm 共25.59 in.兲 and flange width at top and bottom is
200 mm 共7.87 in.兲. Flange thicknesses at top and bottom are
Beam – Elevation End Section 90 mm 共3.54 in.兲 and thickness of web is 120 mm 共4.72 in.兲. The
end section of I-girder of length 1,020 mm 共40.16 in.兲 consisting
Fig. 2. Anchoring of external prestressing at the sides using through of a rectangular portion of 700 mm 共27.56 in.兲 and an I-shaped
bolts segment of 320 mm 共12.60 in.兲 are chosen as the test specimens.
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
BURSTING REINFORCEMENT
LIFTING HOOK
SPALLING REINFORCEMENT HANGER BARS 10mm Ø BAR
(a) 16 mm (b) 10 mm
SPIRAL REINFORCEMENT
650 Fig. 5. Torque-controlled expansion anchors of 共a兲 16 mm; 共b兲
10 mm diam
325
100
Expansion-Type Anchor Bolts
30 180 180 180 200 200 50
Two types of expansion-type anchors are used in the tests and are
1020
shown in Fig. 5. The capacities of anchor bolts specified by the
manufacturer are given in Table 1. These are used in the design of
Fig. 4. Reinforcement details of end block anchoring the external prestress of 188 kN accounting for 30%
loss of initial prestress.
Steel
D16 D4 D8 D12
High-yield strength deformed bars having yield strength of
415 MPa 共60.24 ksi兲 are used as reinforcement. The high tensile
rock-anchor rod of 36 mm 共No. 11 bar兲 diam having an average 320
tensile strength of 1,000 MPa 共145.16 ksi兲 is used for applying
the simulated internal prestressing force of 624 kN to the test
specimen. The expansion-type anchor bolts having design shear
strength of 80.9 kN and tensile strength of 33.6 kN are used for
transferring external prestressing force to the concrete member in
shear mode. Fig. 6. Instrumentation details
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
the design live load acting on the beam is applied horizontally
through 300 kN capacity jack. By assuming prestress loss of 30%
of initial prestress is induced in the test specimen by releasing
30% of initial prestress. A horizontal reaction is also reduced
correspondingly. For the test specimen EB-1, holes of 25 mm
共0.98 in.兲 diam and 125 mm 共4.92 in.兲 long are drilled on each
side of end block at four locations to insert expansion type bolts
of 16 mm 共0.63 in.兲 diam. Four bolts are arranged at an effective
horizontal spacing of 275 mm 共10.83 in.兲 and vertical spacing of
160 mm 共6.30 in.兲 on each side of the specimen. The effective
minimum edge distance provided for the bolts is 140 mm
共5.51 in.兲. The bolts were inserted through the steel brackets on
both sides and tightened by a torque meter to a specified value of
120 N m 共88.45 lb ft兲. The effective anchorage depth, designed
(a) Test specimen above the test floor tensile, and shear loads of a single bolt are 120 mm 共4.72 in.兲,
33.6 kN, and 80.9 kN, respectively.
To understand the load transfer mechanism to the end block,
one more test specimen 共EB-4兲 was cast with small size bolt of
10 mm 共No. 3 bar兲 diam. The anchorage depth, designed tensile,
and shear loads of a single bolt are 90 mm 共3.54 in.兲, 19.70 kN,
and 39.4 kN, respectively. Eight bolts are arranged at an effective
horizontal spacing of 137.5 mm 共5.41 in.兲 and vertical spacing of
80 mm 共3.15 in.兲 on each side of the specimen. The effective
minimum edge distance provided for the bolts is 120 mm
(b) Below the test floor
共4.72 in.兲. The bolts are tightened by a torque meter to a specified
value of 50 N m 共36.86 lb ft兲.
Fig. 7. Test setup: 共a兲 test specimen above the test floor; 共b兲 below To measure the vertical slip and horizontal displacement of the
the test floor steel bracket, dial gauges at the top and bottom of the steel
bracket are installed. External prestress is applied as a vertical
load on steel brackets in increments of 15 kN per actuator. For the
As part of the experimental program, six cubes of size 100 mm case of EB-1, reaction load is kept constant whereas reaction load
共3.94 in.兲 and six cylinders of size 100 mm 共3.94 in.兲 diam and is varied proportional to the external load for the case of EB-4.
200 mm 共7.87 in.兲 height were cast along with the test specimen Reaction load is arrived at by equating the stresses due to external
in order to determine the compressive strength and split tensile load and reaction load to zero. The loads are applied until failure
strength of concrete. The average compressive strength was ob- of the end blocks. Corresponding to each stage of loading, the dial
tained as 36.92 MPa 共5.36 ksi兲 and 50.4 MPa 共7.32 ksi兲 after 7 gauge readings are recorded. During application of external load,
and 28 days, respectively. Similarly, average split tensile strength rotation as well as slipping of steel bracket against the concrete is
of cylinders after 7 and 28 days are 2.37 MPa 共0.34 ksi兲 and measured.
4.18 MPa 共0.61 ksi兲, respectively.
Discussion of Test Results
Test Setup The first visible crack is observed on the top surface of the speci-
men, which extended throughout the width of the specimen for
Two rigid steel brackets are designed to transfer the external pre- EB-1. The corresponding load is 540 kN. The formation of a
stressing force onto the test specimen. These brackets are con- crack indicates that the development of tension in the concrete
nected to the test specimen by expansion-type anchor bolts. Two above the top row bolts is due to bending action caused by the
hydraulic actuators are fixed to the loading frame to apply exter- external loads. With further increase in load, the same crack
nal force on the steel brackets. The test specimen itself is an- propagated vertically on either side of the vertical surfaces. Fur-
chored to the test floor through a system of box beams and high ther, inclined cracks are observed originating from the top row of
strength bolts. The expected end reaction from the beam due to the bolts propagating away from the bolt towards the nearest
loading is applied to the test specimen through a horizontal jack. edges of the specimen. With a further increase in external load,
The horizontal jack is fixed to a rigid pedestal anchored to the test cracks started on both vertical faces of the specimen and widened
floor. The vertical load simulating the external prestress through the already formed cracks. Pullout failure of the bolts along with
two vertical actuators is controlled from a hydraulic loading plant, concrete surrounding bolts and concrete edge failure occurred si-
while the horizontal jack simulating the end reaction on the beam multaneously at ultimate load. The ultimate load for EB-1 is
is controlled through a separate electrically operated pump. The 795 kN. The failure pattern of the specimen 共EB-1兲 at ultimate
test setup including the test floor is shown in Fig. 7. load is shown in Fig. 8
The design load for the group of 16 mm diam bolts is 245 kN.
The ratio of ultimate load and cracking load is 1.47, whereas the
Test Procedure
ratio of ultimate load and design load is 3.25. The first visible
Internal full prestress force of 625 kN is applied vertically by crack is observed on the surface of the specimen for EB-4 and the
tensioning 36 mm 共No. 11 bar兲 diam anchor rod against the test corresponding load is 320 kN. The reason for early cracks in
floor. The end reaction component of 125 kN corresponding to EB-4 is attributed to the smaller diam of bolts, less anchorage
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
(a) 16 mm dia bolt
depth of bolts and concrete surrounding the bolts is subjected to Slips and slopes are an important observation as they indicate loss
more tension. The ultimate load for EB-4 is 570 kN. At ultimate of external prestress. The behavior of the EB-1 and EB-4 is simi-
load, concrete surrounding the bolts is pulled out suddenly due to lar up to design load. The average slip of EB-1 and EB-4 is
an increase in tension more than the concrete cone capacity. Fig. 0.3 mm 共0.012 in.兲 at their respective design loads. The average
slip of EB-1 at cracking and ultimate loads are 4.6 mm 共0.18 in.兲
9 shows the failure pattern of EB-4. The design load for the group
and 11.08 mm 共0.44 in.兲, respectively, while the corresponding
of 10 mm diam bolts is 252 kN. The ratio of ultimate load and
values of slip for EB-4 are 3.0 mm 共0.12 in.兲 and 9.87 mm
cracking load is 1.78, whereas the ratio of ultimate load and de-
共0.39 in.兲, respectively. It can be observed that the slip is smaller
sign load is 2.26. Deformation of the bolt in EB-1 and EB-4 at
by 30 and 50% at cracking load and ultimate load, respectively, in
ultimate load is shown in Fig. 10.
the case of EB-1 compared to that of EB-4. The reason may be
A ductile failure is observed in EB-1 whereas a sudden failure
due to more anchorage depth. Slope is calculated using the mea-
is observed in EB-4. Spalling and crushing of concrete are ob-
sured out-of-plane deformation. Slope of the steel bracket at ulti-
served more in EB-1 than in EB-4 at ultimate load. The test
mate loads for EB-1 and EB-4 are 0.74 and 1.0, respectively. It
results proved that the proposed anchoring system using
can be observed that the slope is smaller by 50 and 36% at crack-
expansion-type anchor bolts with 16 mm diam bolts with internal
ing load and ultimate load, respectively, in the case of EB-1 com-
prestressing and 10 mm diam bolts, transferred the 30% prestress
pared to that of EB-4. It can be observed that the slope of EB-4 is
loss 共187 kN兲 in shear mode as an external load to end block
less than the value of that of EB-1 at a given load. Slip and slope
specimens successfully. At ultimate load, EB-1 performed better
of the steel bracket under combination of loads for test specimens
than EB-4.
EB-1 and EB-4 are shown in Figs. 11 and 12, respectively.
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
900 FE Modeling and Analysis of EB-1
800 Volume has been created as per the geometry described in the
Experimental Program and the Test Setup sections. Eight-noded
700 solid elements 共SOLID 45兲 have been employed to model con-
crete block, bolts, and bracket connection. The use of these ele-
600
ments provides the same number of integration point density as
the higher order elements but requires much less computational
Load, kN
500
effort. This element is defined by orthotropic material properties
400 that correspond to the element coordinate directions. Each node
has three translational degrees of freedom, namely, Ux, Uy, and
300 Uz in x, y and z directions, respectively. The element has plastic-
EB-1 ity, creep, swelling, stress stiffening, large deflection, and large
200
EB-4 strain capabilities. A bolt is idealized as square in shape instead of
100 circular to avoid modeling issues. The bolt is embedded for a
length of 125 mm 共4.92 in.兲 inside the concrete block. At the end
0 of the bolt, a link element has been created connecting the sur-
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 faces of bolt and concrete. The principal function of the link
Slip, mm element is to transfer the forces arising due to external prestress-
ing loads. An imaginary surface has been created between the
Fig. 11. Slip of the steel bracket concrete block and the bracket in order to allow the bolt move-
ment in the out-of-plane direction under the external prestressing
load.
500 stresses and the applied load is evaluated. A linear solution is then
400 carried out using out-of-balance loads and convergence is
300
EB-1
checked. When the convergence criterion is not satisfied, the
200 out-of-balance load is reevaluated, the stiffness matrix is updated,
EB-4
100 and a new solution is obtained. This iterative procedure continued
0 until the solution converges for given tolerance limits.
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
Slope, degrees Loading Conditions
As already stated, there are various loadings, namely, shear load
Fig. 12. Slope of the steel bracket in the form of reaction, pretension in the bolt, initial prestress, and
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
Fig. 13. Multilinear stress-strain plot: 共a兲 steel; 共b兲 concrete
Boundary Conditions
All the degrees of freedom have been constrained on the bottom
surface of the block simulating the fixity condition of the test
floor. FE mesh along with modeling characteristics are shown in
Fig. 14.
Linear static and nonlinear static analysis has been carried out
depending on the magnitude of the external prestressing load. At
each incremental load, out-of-plane deformation and slip have
been noted down. Rotation of the bracket has been calculated by
using the computed out-of-plane deformation. Figs. 15 and 16
show the out-of-plane deformation and vertical deformation
共slip兲, respectively, up to an ultimate load of 400 kN. The com-
puted slope and slip values of the steel bracket have been com-
pared with the corresponding experimental observations. Figs. 17
and 18 show the slope and slip plots comparing computed and
experimental values. From Fig. 17, it can be observed that the
computed slopes and the corresponding experimental observa-
tions are in very good agreement with each other. From Fig. 18, it Fig. 15. Out-of-plane deformation at ultimate load
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
450
400
350
300
External load, kN
250
200
Present study
150 Experimental
100
50
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Slip, mm
Fig. 18. Slip of steel bracket under external prestress load for EB-1
Fig. 16. Vertical deformation 共slip兲 at ultimate load
Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright
Fanning, P. J., Tucker, M., and Broderick, B. M. 共2000兲. “Non-linear beams prestressed with external tendons.” Eng. Struct., 28共14兲, 1919–
finite element analysis of semi-rigid bolted end-plate connections.” 1926.
Int. Conf. Comp. Struct. Tech., Leuven, Belgique, 397–403. Ma, Z., Saleh, M. A., and Tadros, M. K. 共1999兲. “Optimized post-
Ghallab, A., and Beeby, A. W. 共2005兲. “Factors affecting the external tensioning anchorage in prestressed concrete I-beams.” PCI J., 44共2兲,
prestressing stress in externally strengthened prestressed concrete 56–73.
Miyamoto, A., Tei, K., Nakamura, H., and Bull, J. W. 共2000兲. “Behavior
beams.” Cem. Concr. Compos., 27共9–10兲, 945–957.
of prestressed beam strengthened with external tendons.” J. Struct.
Jung, J., Abolmaali, A., and Choi, Y. 共2006兲. “Finite-element analysis of
Eng., 126共9兲, 1033–1044.
tapered steel and fiber-reinforced plastic bridge camera poles.” J. Stoll, F., Saliba, J. E., and Casper, L. E. 共2000兲. “Experimental study of
Bridge Eng., 11共5兲, 611–617. CFRP-prestressed high strength concrete bridge beams.” Compos.
Kim, J., Yoon, J. C., and Kang, B.-S. 共2007兲. “Finite element analysis and Struct., 49共2兲, 191–200.
modeling of structure with bolted joints.” Appl. Math. Model., 31, Youakim, S. A., and Karbhari, V. M. 共2007兲. “An approach to determine
895–911. long-term behavior of concrete members prestressed with FRP ten-
Lou, T. J., and Xiang, Y. Q. 共2006兲. “Finite element modeling of concrete dons.” Constr. Build. Mater., 21共5兲, 1052–1060.
View publication stats Downloaded 05 May 2009 to 203.193.155.67. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright