Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2014)
285
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2014)
We have used M25 grade of concrete with the ratio 1:1:2 To study slump loss and workability of concrete slump
i.e. 1 part of cement, 1 part of fine aggregate and 2 part of cone test has been performed. The result has been
coarse aggregate. interpreted in terms of various combination forms as
follows.
A. Materials Specification
1. Variation in slump for different w/c ratio.
Following are the materials used 2. Variation in ultimate compressive strength for
Cement: 53 grade of ordinary Portland cement different w/c ratio (0.35, 0.45, 0.55)
Aggregate: 20mm retaining size 3. Variation in slump for different proportion of fly ash.
Sand: Fine aggregate 4. Variation of compressive strength with replacement
Water: Potable water of fly ash in different quantity and for different curing
Mineral admixtures: Fly ash period.
This study performed over nominal mix of M25(1:1:2)
B. Characteristic of Material
grade of concrete only. In this project first we used
Cement: 53 grade of ordinary Portland cement different w/c ratio as 0.35, 0.45 & 0.55, to know variation
Aggregate: 20 mm maximum nominal size of in slump loss and higher strength of M25 concrete for
aggregate different w/c ratio. We casted three cubes for each w/c ratio
Sand: Fine aggregate and cured these for four days. And from this we get that
Water: Potable water M25 concrete delivers higher compressive strength with
Admixture: We have used mineral admixture as 0.35 w/c ratio. It shows in table I and figure I
fly ash. TABLE I
Mineral admixtures- Fly ash COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE WITH DIFFERENT W/C
Ultra-fine fly ash RATIO
Collected by electro-static precipitators in SOFIA
Compressive Avg. Comp.
power plant Sr.No.
W/C
Strength Strength
ratio
C. Experimental Investigation and Authentication N/Sq.mm N/Sq.mm
21.32
We have casted cubes of size 150X150X150 mm. 1.
Following material proportion and various dosage
2. 23.74
combination of admixture for 0.35 w/c ratio have been 0.35 22.45
studied. For nominal mix of M25 grade of concrete (1:1:2) 3. 22.29
Cement: 1 kg
Fine aggregate: 1 kg 4. 20.62
Coarse aggregate: 2 kg
5. 20.90
Water: W/c ratios is 0.35
0.45 20.89
Fly ash: Replacement of cement 10%, 20%, and
6. 21.15
30% by weight of cement
7. 8.97
IV. RESULTS INTERPRETATION
In this research we show the effect of mineral admixture 8. 12.30
(fly ash) on the properties of concrete, which has been 0.55 11.10
investigated in laboratory and result obtained. So we 9. 12.04
present it graphically and discussed about it. The study has
been carried out by preparing concrete cubes for M25 grade
of nominal mix and tested after 7, 14 and 28 days of curing.
Cubes are casted for 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% replacement
of fly ash (mineral admixture) with the weight of cement.
286
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2014)
From fig II we can see the variation in slump loss with
different proportion of fly ash and in figures III, IV, V, VI
25 & VII it is clear that, variation in ultimate compressive
Compressive Strength
TABLE III
5 SLUMP WITH DIFFERENT PROPORTION OF FLY ASH
% Of Fly Ash 0% 10% 20% 30%
0 With Weight Of
0.35 0.45 0.55 Cement
Slump in MM 00 00 16 24
Avg.
150 %
Date Of Comp. Comp.
Of Date Of Strength
SN Crushin Strength
Fly Casting
g N/Sq.mm
100
mm
Ash
Slump curve N/Sq.mm
50 1 27.03
2 26/02/1 13/03/1 23.13 23.18
0%
3 4 4 19.37
0
4 23.49
0.35 0.45 0.55 5 28.31 26.33
10 28/02/1 15/03/1
6 % 4 4 27.19
7 27.48
FIGURE II VARIATION IN SLUMP FOR DIFFERENT W/C RATIO 8 20 01/03/1 16/03/1 23.87 25.93
9 % 4 4 26.44
10 23.65
11 30 04/03/1 19/03/1 20.84 22.08
12 % 4 4 21.74
287
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2014)
Compressive strength for different proportion of fly ash
after 28 days curing
27 TABLE VI
26
Comp. Strength
23
22 Avg.
21 %
Date Of Comp. Comp.
20 SN
Of Date Of
Crushin Strength Strength
19 Fly Casting
g N/Sq.mm
Ash
0% 10% 20% 30% N/Sq.mm
1 38.71
2 26/02/1 13/03/1 38.38 39.07
0%
3 4 4 40.11
FIGURE IV Compressive Strength For Different Proportion Of Fly 4 41.29
Ash After 7 Days Curing 5 10 28/02/1 15/03/1 44.36 43.11
% 4 4 43.68
Compressive strength for different proportion of fly ash 6
after 14 days curing 7 38.68
8 20 01/03/1 16/03/1 37.98 40.59
TABLE V
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR DIFFERENT PROPORTION OF FLY ASH 9 % 4 4 45.11
AFTER 14 DAYS CURING 10 33.08
11 30 04/03/1 19/03/1 28.33 30.92
Avg. % 4 4 31.34
% Comp.
12
Date Of Comp.
Of Date Of Strength
SN Crushin Strength
Fly Casting
g N/Sq.mm
Ash
N/Sq.mm
1 35.66
2 26/02/1 13/03/1 31.13
0% 34.03
3 4 4 35.02
4 38.51
5 10 28/02/1 15/03/1 39.01
37.23
6 % 4 4 34.16
7 38.08
8 20 01/03/1 16/03/1 31.60 35.68
9 % 4 4 37.35
10 26.50
11 30 04/03/1 19/03/1 27.06 27.47 FIGURE VI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR DIFFERENT PROPORTION
12 % 4 4 28.87 OF FLY ASH AFTER 28 DAYS CURING
288
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2014)
REFERENCES
[1] Li Yijin, Zhou Shiqiong,Yin Jian and Gao Yingli, ―EFFECTS OF
FLY ASH ON THE FLUIDITY OF CEMENT PASTE, MORTAR
AND CONCRETE.‖, International workshop on sustainable
50 development and concrete technology, Central South University,
45
Comp. Strength
PRC, pp.339-345.
40
(N/Sq.mm)
289