INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
(5) (3)
(4)

Showed Showed Showed

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
rating sheet and/or inter-observer content and its content and its content and its
agreement form about knowledge of integration integration integration
content within and across curriculum Quality within and within and within and
teaching areas across subject across subject across subject
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed areas as shown areas as shown areas as shown
1. Applied highlighting integration of content in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
knowledge of knowledge within and across subject rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
content within areas 7.50%
and across 3. Instructional materials highlighting
curriculum mastery of content and its integration in
teaching areas. other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2
highlighting integration of content least 4 lessons lessons using lessons using
knowledge within and across subject using MOV 1 MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
areas Efficiency and supported supported by supported by
5. Others (Please specify and provide by any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
annotations) other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV
1 Content
Knowledge
and
Basic Pedagogy
Educatio
n
Services

22. 5 %

noldconz
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
1 Content (5) (3)
(4)
Knowledge
and
Basic Pedagogy
Educatio Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated
n using different using different using different
Services teaching teaching teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) promote promote promote
22. 5 % rating sheet and/or inter-observer Quality reading, reading, reading,
agreement form about teaching writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
strategies that enhance learner numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills
achievement in literacy and numeracy as shown in as shown in as shown in
skills MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
2. Used a range 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
of teaching teaching highlighting learner-centered
strategies that strategies that promote literacy and/or
enhance learner 7.50%
numeracy skills
achievement in 3. Instructional materials highlighting
literacy and learner-centered strategies that promote Submitted at
numeracy skills Submitted 3 Submitted 2
literacy and/or numeracy skills least 4
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) learnercentere learnercentere
learnercentere
used in teaching d lessons as d lessons as
d lessons as
5. Results of assessment used in teaching evidently evidently
evidently
6. Others (Please specify and provide shown in MOV shown in MOV
Efficiency shown in MOV
annotations) 1 and 1 and
1 and supported by supported by
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other MOV other MOV
other MOV given given
given

noldconz
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
(5) (3)
(4)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT)

rating sheet and/or inter-observer Used different Used different Used different
agreement form about teaching teaching teaching teaching
strategies to develop critical and creative strategies that strategies that strategies that
thinking, as well as other higherorder develop critical develop critical develop critical
thinking skills
Quality and creative and creative and creative
thinking thinking thinking
3. Applied a 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in and/or other and/or other and/or other
1 Content range of teaching highlighting different teaching HOTS as shown HOTS as shown HOTS as shown
Knowledge teaching strategies that develop critical and in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
and strategies to creative thinking and/or other HOTS rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Pedagogy develop critical 7.50%
and creative 3. Instructional materials
thinking, as well highlighting different teaching strategies
as other higher- that develop critical and creative
22. 5 % order thinking thinking and/or other HOTS
skills. 4. Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2
Performance tasks/test material(s) used least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as
in demonstration teaching as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
Efficiency MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
5. Results of assessment used in supported by supported by supported by
teaching any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
6. Others (Please specify and provide other given other given other given
annotations MOV MOV MOV

Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom

management management management
4. Managed strategies that strategies that strategies that
classroom 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) engage engage engage
structure to rating sheet and/or inter-observer Quality learners in learners in learners in
engage learners, agreement form about managing activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
individually or classroom structure that engages as shown in as shown in as shown in
in groups, in learners in various activities MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
Basic rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Educatio meaningful 2. Lesson
n exploration, plans/modified DLLs highlighting 7.50%
Services discovery and various classroom management
hands-on strategies that engage learners in
activities within activities/tasks in different physical
a range of learning environments
physical 3. Others (Please specify and provide
noldconz learning annotations)
 classroom 1. Classroom observation tool (COT)
structure to rating sheet and/or inter-observer
engage learners, agreement form about managing PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
individually or classroom structure that engages WEIGHT
in groups, in learners in variousMOV
activities TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs
Basic KRAs OBJECTIVES QET Very
meaningful 2. Lesson INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
Educatio IVE Satisfactory
n exploration, plans/modified DLLs highlighting 7.50% (5) (3)
discovery and various classroom management (4)
Services
hands-on strategies that engage learners in
activities within activities/tasks in different physical
a range of learning environments Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2
physical 3. Others (Please specify and provide least 4 lessons lessons lessons
learning annotations) supported by supported by supported by
environments Efficiency MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
2. Learning
Environment
and Diversity
of Learners
Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Applied Applied Applied
22.5 % teacher teacher teacher
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teacher management of management management management
learner behavior using the following strategies of strategies of strategies of
strategies: learner learner learner
1. Providing motivation behavior that behavior that behavior that
5. Managed Quality promote promote promote
2. Praising
learner behavior the learners/Giving positive feedback positive and positive and positive and
constructively by non-violent non-violent non-violent
applying discipline as discipline as discipline as
positive and 3. Setting house rules/guidelines shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
4. Ensuring 7.50%
non-violent learners’ active participation submitted with submitted with submitted with
discipline to a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
ensure 5. Allowing learners to express their
learningfocused ideas/opinions
environments. 6. Giving equal opportunities to learners

7. Encouraging learners to ask questions Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at

least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the
Efficiency given
8. Others (Please specify and provide strategies
as observed in given strategies given strategies
annotations) as observed in as observed in
at least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons
lessons

noldconz
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
(5) (3)
(4)

Applied Applied Applied

differentiated differentiated differentiated
teaching teaching teaching
strategies to strategies to strategies to
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality address learner address learner address learner
rating sheet and/or inter-observer diversity as diversity as diversity as
agreement form about using shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
differentiated, developmentally 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
appropriate learning experiences of 7 of 6 of 5
6. Used 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
differentiated, developed highlighting differentiation in
2. Learning developmentally content, product, process, learning
appropriate environment or others according to
Environment
and Diversity experiences to learners’
learning gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences 7.50%
of Learners Submitted at Submitted 3
address 3. Submitted 2
learners’ gender, Instructional materials developed least 4
22.5 % differentiated differentiated
needs, strengths, highlighting differentiation in content, differentiated teaching teaching
interests and product, process, learning environment teaching
strategies in at least 2 lessons strategies
strategies in at in 2
experiences. or others according to learners’ gender, lessons as
needs, strengths, interests and least 2 lessons
Efficiency as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by
experiences MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and supported by supported by
4. Others supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
(Please specify and provide annotations) any 1 of the other other
other acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Basic
Educatio
n
Services

noldconz
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
(5) (3)
(4)

Planned and Planned and Planned and

implemented implemented implemented
developmentall developmentall developmentall
y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
Quality teaching and teaching and teaching and
Basic learning learning learning
Educatio 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) process as process as process as
n rating sheet and/or inter-observer shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Services agreement form about using 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
7. Planned,
managed and developmentally sequenced teaching and of 7 of 6 of 5.
learning process
implemented 2. Lesson plans/modified
developmentally DLLs highlighting developmentally
sequenced sequenced instruction that meet
teaching and curriculum goals and varied teaching
learning 7.50%
contexts Submitted at
processes to Submitted 3 Submitted 2
3. Instructional materials least 4
meet curriculum used to implement developmentall developmentall
requirements sequenced teachingdevelopmentally developmentall y sequenced y sequenced
and learning process y sequenced
and varied teaching and teaching and
to meet curriculum requirements and teaching and
teaching learning learning
varied teaching contexts learning
contexts. process as process as
Efficiency process
3. as
4. Others (Please specify and provide evidently evidently
Curriculum evidently
annotations) shown in MOV shown in MOV
and Planning shown in MOV 1 and 1 and
22.5% 1 and supported by supported by
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

noldconz
 and Planning
22.5%

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
(5) (3)
(4)

Consistently Frequently Occasionally

participated in participated in participated in
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/
meetings to meetings to meetings to
discuss discuss discuss
Quality teacher/learne teacher/learne teacher/learne
1. Personal notes of teachers on r feedback to r feedback to r feedback to
8. Participated LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof of enrich enrich enrich
in collegial attendance instruction as instruction as instruction as
discussions that 2. Minutes of shown in the shown in the shown in the
use teacher and LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
7.50%
learner learner feedback to enrich teaching
feedback to practice with proof of attendance
enrich teaching
practice. 3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Participated in Participated in Participated in
at least 4 3 LACs/FGDs/ 2 LACs/FGDs/
3. LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as
Curriculum Efficiency meetings as evidently evidently
and Planning evidently shown in any 1 shown in any 1
22.5% shown in any 1 of the given of the given
of the given MOV MOV
MOV

Developed and Developed and Developed and

used varied used varied used varied
teaching and teaching and teaching and
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) learning learning learning
rating sheet and/or inter-observer resources, resources, resources,
agreement form about using appropriate Quality including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
teaching and learning resources, to address to address to address
including ICT learning goals learning goals learning goals
Examples:  Activity sheets/task as shown in as shown in as shown in
9. Selected, MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
sheets/work sheets
developed, rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
 PowerPoint presentations
organized and  Video
used clips
appropriate  Module
teaching and 7.50%
noldconz learning  SIMs-Strategic Intervention Materials
resources,
 agreement form about using appropriate
teaching and learning resources,
including ICT
Examples:  Activity sheets/task WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
9. Selected, sheets/work sheets TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs developed,
OBJECTIVES MOV QET
organized and  PowerPoint presentations  Video INE /OBJECT Outstanding Very Satisfactory
used IVE Satisfactory
clips (5) (3)
appropriate (4)
 Module
teaching and 7.50%
learning  SIMs-Strategic Intervention Materials Submitted at Submitted 2
resources, Submitted 3
 Others least 4 varied varied teaching
including ICT, to varied teaching
address learning teaching and and learning
2. Lesson plans/modified and learning
goals. learning resources,
DLLs with appropriate instructional resources,
resources, including ICT,
materials appended including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently
3. Others as evidently
Efficiency as evidently shown in MOV
Basic (Please specify and pr ovide annotations) shown in MOV
shown in MOV 1 and
Educatio 1 and
1 and supported by
n supported by
supported by any 1 of the
Services any 1 of the
any 1 of the acceptable
acceptable
acceptable MOV
MOV
MOV

Designed Designed Designed

selected, selected, selected,
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) organized and organized and organized and
rating sheet and/or inter-observer used used used
agreement form about using diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
formative and summative assessment formative and formative and formative and
strategies summative summative summative
2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs Quality assessment assessment assessment
10. Designed, strategies strategies strategies
highlighting appropriate use of formative
selected, consistent with consistent with consistent with
assessment strategies
organized and curriculum curriculum curriculum
3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a)
4. used diagnostic, requirements requirements requirements
with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with
Assessment formative and as shown in as shown in as shown in
sample accomplished
and summative 7.50% MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
questionnaire/answer sheets
Reporting assessment rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
4. Developed
22.5 % strategies summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed
consistent with by superior; (b) with sample
curriculum accomplished questionnaire/answer
requirements. sheets 5.
Developed performance tasks: (a) with
rubrics reviewed by superior; (b) with
sample accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
noldconz
 selected, assessment strategies
organized and 3. Developed diagnostic tests: (a)
4. used diagnostic, with TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with
Assessment formative and WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
sample accomplished
and summative TIMEL 7.50%
PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES questionnaire/answer
MOV sheets QET
Reporting assessment INE /OBJECT Very
4. Developed Outstanding Satisfactory
22.5 % strategies IVE Satisfactory
summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed (5) (3)
consistent with (4)
by superior; (b) with sample
curriculum accomplished questionnaire/answer
requirements. sheets 5. Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2
Developed performance tasks: (a) with least 4 varied varied varied
rubrics reviewed by superior; (b) with assessment assessment assessment
sample accomplished rubrics tools as tools as tools as
6. Others (Please specify and Efficiency evidently evidently evidently
provide annotations) shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any 1
of the of the of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Consistently Frequently Occasionally

monitored and monitored and monitored and
evaluated evaluated evaluated
learner learner learner
progress and progress and progress and
Quality achievement achievement achievement
1. Compilation of a learner’s written using learner using learner using learner
work with summary of results and with attainment attainment attainment
signature of parents data as shown data as shown data as shown
2. in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
11. Monitored Formative/summative assessment tools submitted submitted submitted
and evaluated with TOS and frequency of errors with
learner progress identified least mastered skills 7.50%
and achievement
using learner 3. Class records/grading sheets Submitted a
Submitted a combination Submitted a
attainment data. 4. Lesson of combination
combination of of
plans/modified DLLs showing index of 3 of the
Efficiency at least 4 of the acceptable 2 of the
mastery acceptable acceptable
5. Others (Please specify and provide MOV
MOV MOV
annotations)

Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV

were were were
Timelinessdistributed distributed distributed
across 4 across 3 across 2
quarters quarters quarters
4.
Basic Assessment
Educatio and
n Reporting
Services
noldconz 22.5 %
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
4. IVE Satisfactory
Basic (5) (3)
Assessment (4)
Educatio and
n Reporting
Services 22.5 %

Consistently Frequently Occasionally

showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt
and clear and clear and clear
communication communication communication
of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
1. At least 3 samples of corrected test needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
12. papers of the same 3 learners in the same and and and
Communicated learning area with parents’ or guardians’ Quality achievement to achievement to achievement to
promptly and signature and date of receipt key key key
clearly the 2. stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
learners’ needs, Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent- including including including
progress and Teacher conferences in all quarters with parents/ parents/ parents/
achievement to proof of parent’s/guardian’s attendance guardians as guardians as guardians as
key shown in the shown in the shown in the
stakeholders, 3. Report cards with MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
including parent’s or guardian’s signature in all 7.50%
parents/guardia quarters supported by minutes of
ns. meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using various
modalities 5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
6. Other documents showing learner combination of combination of combination of
needs, progress and achievement Efficiency at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the
submitted to other stakeholders acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

4. Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV

Assessment were were were
and Timeliness distributed distributed distributed
Reporting across 4 across 3 across 2
22.5 % quarters quarters quarters

noldconz
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
(5) (3)
(4)

1. Certificate of Recognition or Consistently Frequently Occasionally

Participation performed performed performed
2. Certificate of Training various related various related various related
3. Certificate work/activities work/activities work/activities
Quality that
of Speakership contribute that contribute that contribute
Basic 4. Committee involvement to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
Educatio learning learning learning
n 13. Performed process as process as process as
5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
Services various related shown in the shown in the shown in the
5. Plus Factor works/activities 6. Book or Journal MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
10 % that contribute Authorship/Coauthorship/Contributorsh 7.50%
to the teaching- ip
learning 7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
process. 8. Coaching
and mentoring learners in competitions
9. Submitted at Submitted 3
Mentoring pre-service/in-service Submitted 2
least 4 different different kinds
teachers different kinds
Efficiency kinds of
10. Others (Please specify and provide of acceptable of acceptable
acceptable
annotations) MOV MOV
MOV

RANDY BUTCH G. GAMBOA 0

Rater Ratee

Note: Do not include in printing

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENT
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500- 5.00 Outstanding
3.500-4.49 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.49 Satisfactory
1.500-2.49 Unsatisfactory
noldconz
 WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMEL PER KRA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV QET Very
INE /OBJECT Outstanding Satisfactory
IVE Satisfactory
(5) (3)
(4)
below 1.49 Poor

by: randybutch.gamboa @deped.gov.ph

noldconz
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Showed
knowledge of
content and its No
integration acceptable
within and
across subject evidence
areas as shown was shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

No
Submitted any acceptable
1 of the given evidence
MOV was shown

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Facilitated
using different
teaching
strategies that No
promote acceptable
reading,
writing and/or evidence
numeracy skills was shown
as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Submitted 1
learner- No
centered lesson acceptable
as evidently evidence
shown in any of was shown
the given MOV

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Used different
teaching
strategies that
develop critical No
and creative acceptable
thinking evidence
and/or other was shown
HOTS as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Submitted 1 No
lesson as acceptable
evidenced by evidence
any 1 of the was shown
given MOV

Used classroom
management
strategies that No
engage acceptable
learners in
activities/tasks evidence
was shown
as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Submitted 1
lesson No
supported by acceptable
any of the evidence
acceptable was shown
MOV

Applied
teacher
management
strategies of
learner No
behavior that acceptable
promote evidence
positive and was shown
non-violent
discipline as
shown in MOV
submitted with
a rating of 4

Submitted any No
1 of the given acceptable
strategies as evidence
observed in was show
only 1 lesson

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Applied
differentiated
teaching No
strategies to
address learner acceptable
evidence
diversity as
shown in MOV shown
1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted any
1 differentiated No
teaching acceptable
strategy in only evidence
1 lesson as shown No
evidently acceptable
shown in any 1 evidence
of the was shown
acceptable
MOV

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Planned and
implemented
developmentall
y sequenced No
teaching and acceptable
learning evidence
process as was show
shown in MOV
1 with a rating
of 4 .

Submitted 1
developmentall
y sequenced
teaching and No
learning acceptable
process as evidence
evidently was shown
shown in any 1
of the given
MOV

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Rarely
participated in
LAC/FGD/
meeting to No
discuss acceptable
teacher/learne evidence
r feedback to was show
enrich
instruction as
shown in the
MOV submitted

Participated in
1 LAC/FGD/ No
meeting as acceptable
evidently evidence
shown in any 1 was shown
of the given
MOV

Developed used
varied teaching
and learning
resources, No
including ICT, acceptable
to address evidence
learning goals was shown
as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Submitted any
teaching and
learning No
resource,
including ICT, acceptable
evidence
as evidently
shown in any of was shown
the acceptable
MOV

Designed
selected,
organized and
used
diagnostic,
formative and No
summative acceptable
assessment evidence
strategies was shown
consistent with
curriculum
requirements
as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Submitted 1
assessment No
tool as acceptable
evidently
shown in any of evidence
the acceptable was shown
MOV

Rarely
monitored and
evaluated
learner No
progress and acceptable
achievement evidence
using learner was shown
attainment
data as shown
in the MOV
submitted

No
Submitted 1 acceptable
acceptable evidence
MOV was shown

Submitted MOV No
was completed evidence
in only 1 was show
quarter

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Rarely showed
prompt and
clear
communication
of the learners’
needs, progress No
and
achievement to acceptable
evidence
key
stakeholders, was shown
including
parents/
guardians as
shown in the
MOV submitted

No
Submitted any acceptable
1 of the given evidence
MOV was shown

Submitted MOV No
was completed acceptable
in only 1 evidence
quarter was show

noldconz
TORS Rating
Actual Results
Unsatisfactory Poor
( 2) (1)
Q E T Ave Score

Rarely
performed
various related
work/activities No
that contribute acceptable
to the teaching evidence
learning was shown
process as
shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted any No
1 of the acceptable
acceptable evidence
MOV was shown

RANDY BUTCH G. GAMBOA

Approving Authority

noldconz
 Note: Follow the scaling below for your rating.

COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

Self-Management Teamwork
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 1
2
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into
2
account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. 3
3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals 3
4
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.
5
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others

Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation

Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical 1
1
Standards for public officials and employee (RA 6713).
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of 2
2
his/her actions and decisions.
Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, 3
3
good grooming and communication.
4
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. 3

5
Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, improves
5
systems and help others improve their effectiveness.

Result Focus Innovation

1
1 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.

Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing 2
2
organizational needs before personal needs.
3
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures
3 correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required.
4
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May
4
focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5
Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance.
5 Examples may include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or 3
improving quality, costumer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
Note:

DEPED RPMS form

NCIES

Teamwork
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty.
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
organization 3

Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.

Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.

Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organizational goals and objectives.
Service Orientation

Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.

Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer service issues and
concerns 3

Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies based on DepEd
strategies and directions.

Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will
further enhance service delivery.

Innovation

Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas,
processes, and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on improving personal
productivity to create higher value and results.

Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions. 3

Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and organization.

Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with
minimal resources.
OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS: 3.0

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form - For Teachers

 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

0.00
Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: 0 Name of Superior: 0

Signature: Signature:
Date: Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)
A. Functional Competencies

Note: Based on the result of

SAT

B. Core Behavioral
Competencies

Note : Based on the result of

Part II
FEEDBACK:

0 0
Ratee Rater Approving Officer
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -For Teacher |