[Downloaded free from http://www.jfcmonline.com on Tuesday, May 28, 2019, IP: 47.11.147.
181]
Letter to Editor
Correlates of physical disability in the elderly
population of rural North India (Haryana) Sir, Md A. Bashar Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, I read with great interest the article by Khan et al. PGIMER, Chandigarh, India titled, “Correlates of physical disability in the elderly Address for correspondence: population of a rural population of North India.”[1] Dr. Md A. Bashar, R. No. 125, School of Public Health, PGIMER, However, certain issues undermine the validity of the Chandigarh - 160 012, India. study findings: E-mail: imback20006@yahoo.in
First, the authors arrived at the requisite sample size by References
taking the relative precision as 20%, which is too high and hence erroneous. Most authors recommend a relative 1. Khan ZA, Singh C, Khan T. Correlates of physical disability in the elderly population of rural North India (Haryana). J Family precision of 5% if prevalence of the disease/condition is Community Med 2018;25:199‑204. expected to be between 10% and 90%.[2] 2. Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench Second, the authors used the Barthel index together 2013;6:14‑7. with Katz index to assess physical disability in the 3. Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living. Available from: study population and defined physical disability as http://www.camapcanada.ca/Barthel.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Nov 21]. needing help in one or more of the activities of daily living activities included in the index. However, the This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Barthel index is an ordinal scale with scores ranging Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as from 0–2 to 0–3 for each of the 10 items totaling 0–20.[3] appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. The authors should have mentioned the cutoff score for Access this article online classifying an elderly person as physically disabled as Quick Response Code: per the scoring system rather than rely on subjective Website: assessment. www.jfcmonline.com
These issues should be considered when the validity of
DOI: the study findings is examined. 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_210_18