0 views

Uploaded by Miguel Regalado

Park 2011-Prediction of Excess Pore Pressure Due to Dissociation of Gas Hydrate With Sandy Soils

Park 2011-Prediction of Excess Pore Pressure Due to Dissociation of Gas Hydrate With Sandy Soils

© All Rights Reserved

- Soil
- Propiedades Geofísicas de Los Suelos - j. Bowel
- Technical Report R1
- Cut and Fill Phase2
- SIFAT-DAN-CIRI-FISIKA-TANAH.pptx
- 87_Graf.pdf
- Piles Rock 1
- 8582
- cien162-05-044.pdf
- Landslide Stabilizing Piles a Design Bas
- Thesis
- probalistic wedge
- Ce2251 Soil Mechanics Qb
- CMD_2009_CMD_Dec09_5P.pdf
- ITL-TR-02-11
- M-tech 2nd Sem Syllabus
- EARTH PRESSURE, SLOPE STABILITY, DEEP EXCAVATION AND LOFE EFACTION ANALYSIS.doc
- RTA Guide to Slope Risk Analysis Version 3 1
- Readme
- 1.PNG

You are on page 1of 4

Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS

DOI: 10.5897/IJPS11.013

1992 - 1950 ©2011 Academic Journals

of gas hydrate within sandy soils

Sung-Sik Park

Department of Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 1370 Sangyeok-dong, Buk-gu, Daegu 702-701,

Republic of Korea. E-mail: sungpark@knu.ac.kr. Tel: +82-53-950-7544. Fax: +82-53-950-6564.

Accepted 03 March, 2011

The small hydrate concept (SHC) was proposed to predict the generated excess pore water pressure

due to dissociation of gas hydrate within sandy soils. This concept was then used to calculate excess

pore water pressure in the Storegga slide of which gas hydrate dissociation may have contributed.

Since the excess pore water pressure calculated by the SHC resulted in the considerable loss of

stiffness and strength in the gas hydrate zone, the submarine slope failure that occurred at the

Storegga slide was successfully simulated.

Key words: Gas hydrate, dissociation, submarine slope, excess pore water pressure.

INTRODUCTION

Gas hydrates are ice-like compounds containing gas cannot escape from gas hydrate sediments, which may

(usually methane) that is trapped by a cage of water not be appropriate to sandy soils.

molecules under high pressure and low temperature. A The purpose of this paper is to propose a simple and

large portion of gas hydrate bearing sediment is occupied practical pore water pressure calculation method which

by hydrate that is surrounded by a soil matrix. Gas can apply for gas hydrate dissociation occurred within

hydrate dissociation can cause pore water pressure sandy soils. The proposed method is herein applied to a

increase in gas hydrate bearing sediments, which results case history of submarine slope failure due to gas

in the decrease of an effective stress and in the hydrate dissociation.

degradation of stiffness and strength of soil in a

submarine slope.

An analytical or theoretical model that can calculate the EXCESS PORE WATER PRESSURE CALCULATION

pore water pressure increase due to the dissociation of METHOD DUE TO GAS HYDRATE DISSOCIATION

gas hydrate between pore spaces was necessary in

order to evaluate the stability of a gas hydrate bearing Wheeler (1988) studied the behavior of soil containing

submarine slope. Kwon et al. (2008) developed a gas bubbles and compared the sizes of gas bubbles to

formulation that can calculate pressure- and temperature- those of soil particles. He assumed a soil structure with

dependent volume changes of gas hydrate and predict discrete gas bubbles in two cases: (i) where the gas

the increase in excess pore water pressure due to gas bubbles were significantly smaller than the soil particles,

hydrate dissociation. Nixon and Grozic (2007) also and (ii) where the gas bubbles were significantly larger

proposed a calculation method for the increase of excess than the soil particles. This assumption can be applied to

pore water pressure following gas hydrate dissociation, a structure of gas hydrate bearing sediments by replacing

and analyzed a submarine slope upon gas hydrate gas bubbles with a fraction of hydrate. By comparing the

dissociation in terms of a factor of safety. Kimoto et al. size of a hydrate with that of a soil particle, two profiles of

(2007) developed a chemo-thermo-mechanically coupled gas hydrate bearing sediments are assumed as follows:

numerical method and predicted the ground settlement For the first profile in Figure 1(a), it is assumed that

due to gas hydrate dissociation. These methods were coarse soil particles such as sand are relatively loosely

derived from a closed boundary condition; generated gas linked and small hydrate fractions are scattered over the

972 Int. J. Phys. Sci.

(a) (b)

Figure 1. Assumed soil profiles containing (a) small hydrates, and (b) large hydrates (modified

from Wheeler, 1988).

soil structure. In the second profile in Figure 1(b), it is increases in water pressure. Under the assumption of the

assumed that hydrate fractions are relatively large and SHC where the generated gas during gas hydrate disso-

enclosed by small soil particles which are continuously ciation may not contribute to pore pressure increase, the

linked. These assumed profiles were assisted by Dillon pore pressure rise can be simulated by the ice-melting

and Max (2002), who mentioned that gas hydrate formed process, which was performed by Jackson et al. (2004).

between sediments normally exists in two ways: (i) They carried out an ice-melting experiment by simply

disseminated form in coarse-grained sediments, and (ii) considering a gas hydrate as an ice, and showed that

nodules and lenses in fine-grained sediments. pore pressure increases as the ice surrounded by

Using the assumed soil profile outlined in Figure 1(a), a saturated sand melts.

method is proposed that can calculate pore water The rise in pore water pressure can be calculated from

pressure generation upon gas hydrate dissociation in the volume change in the assumed soil skeleton. The

coarse-grained sediments. volume change of all components of gas hydrate can be

the same as the volume change of the gas hydrate as

follows (Sultan et al., 2004):

Small hydrate concept

∆V = ∆V s + ∆V w + ∆V g + ∆V H (1)

The profile of sediments containing gas hydrate varies

considerably, depending on soil types, gas amounts and Where ∆VS is the volume change of solid; ∆VW is the

formation conditions such as temperature and pressure. volume change of water; ∆Vg is the volume change of

The basic composition of gas hydrate consists of soil gas; ∆VH is the volume change of hydrate. In Equation 1,

particle, hydrate, and water. A small hydrate concept the volume change of solid is insignificant because solid

(SHC) is proposed based on the assumption that a is usually incompressible, and the volume change of gas

fraction of hydrate is smaller than a soil particle and can be omitted as originally assumed. Therefore,

exists between coarse particles such as sandy soils as Equation 1 can be simplified as follows:

shown in Figure 1(a). In this condition, upon gas hydrate

dissociation, the generated gas can easily escape from a

∆ V = ∆ V w + ∆ VH (2)

loosely-connected soil skeleton. Consequently, the

volume of soil structure decreases as ice-like hydrates

are converted into water. The corresponding volume In summary, the total volume change ∆ V is the sum of

decrease in the soil structure confines water, resulting in the water and hydrate volume change, ∆VW+ ∆VH.

Park 973

Equation 2 is uncomplicated and practical to use al. (2004) and other researchers (Leynaud et al., 2004;

compared to Equation 1. Since water can be considered Mienert et al., 2005) investigated the influence of gas

incompressible, the volume change of gas hydrate is the hydrate dissociation on submarine slope using a case

same as hydrate volume change. Each volume of hydrate study of the Storegga slide. It was assumed that the

produces 0.87 volumes of water at standard pressure Storegga slide would fail due to gas hydrate dissociation

and temperature conditions (1 atm. and 25°C). Therefore, (Sultan et al., 2004). This hypothetical slide was selected

the volumetric strain is 0.13. By multiplying an equivalent to evaluate the proposed excess pore water pressure

bulk stiffness of pore water (= Bf/n) to the volumetric calculation method.

strain (∆εv) we can determine the excess pore water In this research, the two-dimensional finite difference

pressure upon gas hydrate dissociation as follows: program FLAC (Itasca, 2004) is used to simulate

The equivalent bulk stiffness is used to incorporate the submarine slope failure due to gas hydrate dissociation.

bulk stiffness of water within soil skeleton. As shown in Figure 2(a), a submarine slope was

assumed where a 10 m thick gas hydrate layer located at

Bf 100 m below the slope. The dimension of this slope is

∆u = ⋅ ∆ε v also shown in Figure 2(a). Left and right boundaries are

n (3) fixed in x direction and free in y direction. Bottom

boundary is fixed in both x and y directions.

The excess pore water pressure which developed at the The stress-strain model used for this slope is an elastic

Storegga slide can be estimated from Equation 3. If the perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb model. It needs two

stiffness of pore water is considered, a bulk stiffness of elastic model parameters, shear modulus G and bulk

pore water Bf is found to be a function of p, the current modulus B, and two plastic model parameters, cohesion

absolute pressure of the water and S, the degree of c’ and friction angle (Ф’). The unit weight of soil was

saturation, and is given by: assumed to be 14 kN/m3. The friction angle for the

Storegga slide was assumed to be 28°, as obtained by

1 Sultan et al. (2004). Cohesion is simply assumed to be

Bf =

1− S S zero. Shear modulus (G) and bulk modulus (B) are

+

p Bw determined as follows:

(4) Based on these values, the initial lateral stress ratio

was set to 0.5.

6

where Bw = 2 × 10 kPa, the bulk stiffness of water. 0. 5

σ′

In this study, by assuming that the saturation is 96% and G = 21.7(100 )(Pa ) m

that p is 950 m below sea level, the bulk stiffness of pore Pa (5)

water Bf in Equation 4 was approximately 2 × 105 kPa.

Porosity n was assumed to be 0.375. Sultan et al. (2004) B = 3⋅G (6)

assumed that the volume of hydrate of the sedimentary

layer was about 1% where the Storegga slide occurred. If tan φ'eq = (1 − ru ) ⋅ tan φ′

(7)

the hydrate amount is 1%, the excess pore water

pressure is calculated as;

where Pa is atmospheric pressure ( ≅ 100 kPa) and σ' m

is the mean effective stress.

.

A friction angle (Ф’) was adjusted to consider the

This method is uncomplicated. However, the influence of excess pore water pressure generation due

determination of Bf is very important because Bf mainly to gas hydrate dissociation. It was defined as Ф’eq in

controls calculated excess pore water pressure. It should Equation 7. A pore water pressure ratio ru, which is the

be noted that Bf is a function of the saturation that is ratio of an excess pore water pressure to an initial

dependant on gas in pores and pressure acting on water. effective stress, is determined from the calculated excess

pore water pressure in the previous section. The ru was

calculated by using the initial vertical effective stress of

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE STOREGGA 700 kPa. Based on this ru, the adjusted friction angle

SLIDE Ф’eq for the method was calculated as 0.3°. Using this

parameter, slope stability analysis was carried out to

During a gas hydrate production process, the submarine evaluate the deformation of the slope. An analysis based

slope may lose its strength and consequently fail. For on the SHC produced considerable movement.

safe gas production from gas hydrates bearing The maximum displacement from the crest was more

sediments, it is necessary to predict the stability of the than 100 m as shown in Figure 2(b). This type of large

submarine slope when gas hydrate dissociates. Sultan et movement could have occurred in the Storegga slide

974 Int. J. Phys. Sci.

Figure 2. (a) Reconstructed Storegga slide geometry for numerical analysis and (b) numerical simulation of Storegga slide after 1% gas

hydrate dissociation.

Hydrate in Oceanic and Permafrost Environments. edited by Max,

CONCLUSIONS MD, Kluwer Acad. New York, pp. 61-76.

Itasca (2004). FLAC version 4.0. Itasca Consulting Group Inc.

An analytical method was proposed to calculate excess Minneapolis.

pore water pressure due to gas hydrate dissociation Jackson P, Gunn D, Long D, Lovell M, Musson R, Hobbs P, Rees J,

using the small hydrate concept (SHC). The predicted Rochelle C, Bateman K, Nelder V (2004). Slope stability issues in

hydrate bearing sediments under seismic loading. AAPG Hedberg

excess pore water pressure was applied to a case history Conference on Gas Hydrates: Energy Resource Potential and

of submarine slope failure where gas hydrate dissociated. Associated Geologic Hazards, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

The method estimated excess pore water pressures in Kimoto S, Oka F, Fushita T, Fujiwaki M (2007). A chemo-thermo-

the Storegga slide due to 1% gas hydrate dissociation to mechanically coupled numerical simulation of the subsurface ground

deformations due to methane hydrates dissociation. Com. Geotech.,

693 kPa. By considering generated excess pore water 34: 216-228.

pressures upon 1% gas hydrate dissociation, the original Kwon TH, Cho GC, Santamarina JC (2008). Gas hydrate dissociation in

friction angle of 28° became 0.3°. Based on the reduced sediments: pressure-temperature evolution. Geochem. Geophy.

friction angles, the estimated slope deformation was Geosys. 9: Q03019, doi:10.1029/2007GC001920.

Leynaud D, Mienert J, Nadim F (2004). Slope stability assessment of

greater than 100 m. The method provides relatively the Helland Hansen area offshore the mid-Norwegian margin. Marine

simple and practical calculation even though it requires Geol., 213: 457-480.

few assumptions and parameters. Therefore, this method Mienert J, Vanneste M, Bunz S, Andreassen K, Haflidason H, Sejrup

can be used to evaluate the stability of a submarine slope HP (2005). Ocean warming and gas hydrate stability on the mid-

Norwegian margin at the Storegga slide. Marine. Petrol. Geol., 22:

due to gas hydrate dissociation at the screening level. 233-244.

Nixon MF, Grozic JLH (2007). Submarine slope failure due to gas

hydrate dissociation: a preliminary quantification. Can. Geotech. J.,

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 44: 314-325.

Sultan N, Cochonat P, Foucher JP, Mienert J (2004). Effect of gas

hydrates melting on seafloor slope instability. Marine Geol., 213: 379-

This research was partially supported by Basic Science 401.

Research program through the National Research Wheeler SJ (1988). A conceptual model for soils containing large gas

Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of bubbles. Geotechnique, 38: 389-397.

Education, Science and Technology (2010-0023540).

- SoilUploaded byBobby Walters
- Propiedades Geofísicas de Los Suelos - j. BowelUploaded byAlyn Giesbert Mendoza Cotrina
- Technical Report R1Uploaded byRoberto De Lucchi
- Cut and Fill Phase2Uploaded byJosé Carlos Bustamante Morales
- SIFAT-DAN-CIRI-FISIKA-TANAH.pptxUploaded bymawiti91
- 87_Graf.pdfUploaded byRonan Cayo
- Piles Rock 1Uploaded bySvetozar Milenkovic
- 8582Uploaded byTony Maruso
- cien162-05-044.pdfUploaded bygulfa2k
- Landslide Stabilizing Piles a Design BasUploaded bygreenday3
- ThesisUploaded byPablo
- probalistic wedgeUploaded byr
- Ce2251 Soil Mechanics QbUploaded byAravindan Krishnamoorthy
- CMD_2009_CMD_Dec09_5P.pdfUploaded byazizahnur95
- ITL-TR-02-11Uploaded byPiulitza88
- M-tech 2nd Sem SyllabusUploaded bySUNILKHUNTIA1988
- EARTH PRESSURE, SLOPE STABILITY, DEEP EXCAVATION AND LOFE EFACTION ANALYSIS.docUploaded byRatih M Johor
- RTA Guide to Slope Risk Analysis Version 3 1Uploaded byTomasz Cz
- ReadmeUploaded byAnonymous ilWXWxg
- 1.PNGUploaded byمحمد أحمد عبداللطيف
- Important Questions SoilUploaded bySURESHKUMAR P
- l 1303077783Uploaded byMARUF
- Lecture2.PDF FoundationFailuresUploaded byTim Caliguid
- Hydromechanical Coupling and Pit Slope Movements - T.D. Sullivan.pdfUploaded byYessicaIdrogo
- A009-T43GMSR-WellConstrainedSeismicUploaded byIng. Luis Alberto García Córdova
- GuniUploaded byAatif
- 223_9238life0903_1532_1537.pdfUploaded bySandeeGuinguing
- Dai-heat and Mass Transfer in Wood Composite Panels During Hot Pressing Part II Modeling Void Formation and Mat PermeabilityUploaded byVinicius Lube
- 36. Equations RMB.pptUploaded byBomboztik
- Document(2)Uploaded byDalton Fernando Anziani Godoy

- Sobhey 2019-Lateral Pressure Developed On Piles In Clay Slopes, Numerical Study.pdfUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Seismic Safety AnalysisUploaded byprashanthatti
- Bhatkar 2016-Prediction of Behaviour of a Deep Excavation in Soft Soil, A Case StudyUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Feng 2016-Numerical Earthquake Response Analysis of the Liyutan Earth Dam in TaiwanUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Schmitt 2015-Geotechnical Instrumentation to Measure Pore-water Pressure and Settlement Og an Ash Pond to Construction of an Ash LandfillUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Sitharam 2008-Evaluation of Undrained Response From Drained Triaxial Tests, DeM Simulations and ExperimentsUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Zheng 2014-Soil Particle Size Characterization by StereophotographyUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Zhao 2009-A Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Loading Conditions on Soil ResponseUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Thoeni 2011-Numerical Analysis of Rockfall Hazard in Open Pit Coal MinesUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Roesler 2013-Finite Element Analysis of a LeveeUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Marto 2019-Screw Driving Sounding Test, A New TechnologyUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Gaetano 2010-The Response of Flexible Pavement Systems to Local Deterioration of the Base LayerUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Noonan 1972Uploaded byCésar Eduardo Asqui Córdova
- Mahmood 1994-Fabric-property Relationships in Fine Granular MaterialsUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Jennings 2012-Similitude Conditions Modeling Geosynthetic-Reinforced Piled Embankments Using FEM and FDM TechniquesUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Umaharathi 2016-Effect of Plastic Fines on Shear Strength of Sands.pdfUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Hencher 1995-Engineering in Weathered RockUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Sitharam 2010-Geotechnical Geophysical Investigations for Seismic Microzonation Studies of Urban Centres in IndiaUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Maqbool-Large-scale Plane Strain Compression Tests on Compacted GravelUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- settlement_of_shallow_foundations_on_granular_soils.pdfUploaded byJohn
- Fahmi 2008-Lateral Spreding in Basal Reinforced Embankments Supported by Pile-like ElementsUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Bensoula 2004-Critical Undrained Shear Strength of Sand-silt Mixtures Under Monotonic LoadingUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Bohác 2013-Mechanical Behaviour of Cemented Fine-grained Soils, Simulation of Undisturbed Samples.pdfUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Likitlersuang 2013-A Hyperplasticity Model for Clay Behaviour, an Application to Bangkok ClayUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Safadoust 2008-Numerical Analysis of Algonquin Geogrid Reinforced Soil RetainingUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Visone-SantucciUploaded bygimusi
- Richardson 2009-Geosynthetic Fundamental in Landfill Design.pdfUploaded byMiguel Regalado
- Kehoe 2000-Considerations of Vertical Acceleration on Structural ResponseUploaded byMiguel Regalado

- Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering Handbook __ Embankments Over Soft Soil and PeatUploaded byfedy
- ASTM D2435-11 (Inglés).pdfUploaded byRodolfo Rojas Montenegro
- ASTM D4186.pdfUploaded byAndrea Bernal Jara
- Soil Mechanics and Foundation McqUploaded bytarun23007
- Preconsolidation StressUploaded byFidel Rodriguez Herreros
- Guide to Geotechnical InstrumentationUploaded byHartono Prayitno
- IMMEDIATE SETTLMENT TUTORIAL.pdfUploaded byNoel Ibrahim
- Geotechnical Engineering Capillarity in seepageUploaded byNicole Cruz
- Settlement and Consolidation, 1-25-00Uploaded bylawan
- Stability AnalysysUploaded byNageswar Pattem
- Fellenius Unified DesignUploaded bysgaluf5
- 1-s2.0-S0266352X1400189X-main.pdfUploaded bycedrichan
- Assignment 5, 6Uploaded byTim Chong
- Bearing capacity of ring footingUploaded byilmareblu
- Settlement and Consolidation, 1-25-00Uploaded bylawan
- 5- Effective Stress ConceptUploaded byKhalid Aljanabi
- “Geotechnical behaviour of an instrumented urban tunnel built under difficult soft soil conditions”,Uploaded byjesusmorj
- 2D and 3D Numerical Modeling of Combined Surcharge and Vacuum Preloading With Vertical Drains - C. Rujikiatkamjorn, Et Al. 2008Uploaded byHiep Hoang
- Skempton pore pressure coefficients A and B.pdfUploaded byRoda Cadiz
- adv soil Mech 5.pdfUploaded byBùi Hồng Lệnh
- Total & Effective StressUploaded byShekh Muhsen Uddin Ahmed
- li2015Uploaded bySérgio Bernardes
- Pore Pressure Coefficients A and B (AW Skempton).pdfUploaded byKathlene Lacosta Lastimosa
- 16 Rapid Draw DownUploaded byNanescu Liliana
- Shear Strength of SoilsUploaded bypankaj
- Geotechnical Engineering ReportUploaded byAbdullah Yucesoy
- Soil MechnicsUploaded byసురేంద్ర కారంపూడి
- Geotechnical Properties of Two Volcanic SoilsUploaded byLogan Brown
- Abaqus Soil Examples_2Uploaded byGustavo Nagel
- Dam Monitoring and InstrumentationUploaded byTonymeri