72

REFERRENCES

Ahmadi, M.R., Ismail, H.N. & Abdullah, M.K.K. 2013. The Important of
Metacognitive Reading Strategy in Reading Comprehension. English
Language Teaching Journal. Vol. 6 No.10 (2013) 235-244. Canadian
Centre of Science Education.

Dörnyei, Zolt’n. 1998. Motivation in Second and Foreign Language Learning.

Language Teaching Cambrigde Journal Vol. 31/Issue 03 (July 1998) 117
135. (online.2009). (https://www.cambridge.org. Accessed on 17th June,
2017).

Dornyei Z. and Skehan P. (in press). Individual differences in second language learning.
In Doughty C. and Long M. (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition.
Oxford: Blackwell.Grabe, William and Stoller, F L. 2013. Teaching and
Researching Reading (2nd Edn). New York: Routledge, Taylor and
Francis Group.

Dornyei, Z. and P. Skehan. 2003. ‘Individual differences in second language

learning’ in C. Doughty and M. Long (eds): Handbook of Second
Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 589–630.

Endryss,Nicole and Nygren, Tanya. 1998. How Proficient Readers Read.

Flavell, J. H. 1976. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick

(Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp.231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Grabe, William. 2002. Reading in a Second Language; Moving from Theory to

Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Harputlu, Leyla & Ceylan, Eda.. 2014. The Effect of Motivation and
Metacognitive Strategy use on EFL Listening Proficiency. Procidia-
Social and Behavioral Science Journal,(online), 158 (2014) 124-131,
(http://www.sciencedirect.com, accessed on 28th of December, 2017).

Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A.1995. The Reader Self-Perception Scale

(RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves
as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48, 470–482.

Iwai, Yuko. 2011. The Effects of Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Pedagogical

Implications for EFL/ESL Teachers. The Reading Matrix Journal Vol. 11
(2011) 150-159,
 73

(online),(http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/april_2011/iwai.pdf.
Accessed on 12th of June, 2017).

Latief, M.A. 2012. Research Methods on Language Learning; an Introduction.

Malang: Univeritas Negeri Malang Press.

Masoom, T.N.R.T.M. and Maroof, Noorainy. 2012. Empowering the ESL

Students with etacognitive Reading Strategy. Procidia-Social and
Behavioral Science Journal,(online), 69 (2012) 1250-1258,
(www.sciencedirect.com, accessed on 28th of June, 2017).

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C.2002. Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness

of reading strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259.

Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning styles and strategies: an Overview.

(online) (https://www.scribd.com/doc/152696884/Learning-Strategies-
by-Oxford. Accessed on 14th June, 2017) 1-25.

Pallant, Julie.F. 2000. SPSS Survival Manual; a step by step guide to data
analysis using SPSS (Version 10): Monash University Press

Qashoa, S.H.H. 2006. Motivation among Learners of English in Secondary

School in the Eastern Coast of the UAE. (online) (https://www.asian-efl-
journal.com/thesis_Sulaiman_Hasan_Qashoa.pdf. Accessed on 28th June, 2017)

Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of
Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being (online).
(http://www.citeseerx.ist.psu.edu. Accessed 3rd September,2017).

Vandergrift, Larry. 2005. Relationship among Motivation Orientations,

Metacognitive Awareness, and Proficiency in L2 Listening. Applied
Linguistics, 26/1: 70–89 (CD-ROM:My ESL-EFL Journals, 2015).

Zhang, Liang & Zhepo, Sirithorn. 2013. Metacognitive Strategy Use and
Academic Reading Achievement: Insights from a Chinese Context.
Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching Vol. 10 No. 1 (2013)
pp. 54-69.