Ipcrf 2019 Yani

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee: DIANA M. GUARINO

Position: Teacher I
District/School: San Miguel Heights Elementary School
Rating Period: School Year 2018-2019
Approving Authority: RIZZA D. ESCOBIDO
Position: Principal II
Brought to you by: WARLY I. SALIDO

March 2019
MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Rater: ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON

Position: Master Teacher II
Date of Review: APRIL 2019
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: DIANA M. GUARINO Name of Rater: ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON

Position: Teacher I Position: Master Teacher II
District/School: San Miguel Heights Elementary School Date of Review: APRIL 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
E
WEIGHT
IN
KRAs OBJECTIVES ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
EL
PER KRA
QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE
M
TI
1 CONTENT 1 Applied Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of No acceptable evidence Applied knowledge of
KNOWLEDGE content and its integration content and its integration content and its integration content and its integration was shown
knowledge of content within and
AND PEDAGOGY within and across subject within and across subject within and across subject within and across subject
content within Quality areas as shown in MOV1 areas as shown in MOV1 areas as shown in MOV1 areas as shown in MOV1 accross subject areas 5
and across with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 as shown in 4 COTs
curriculum May with a rating of 7
teaching areas. 2018 to
7.5% 5 0.375
April Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 the given No acceptable evidence
Submitted 4 lesson
2019 leassons using MOV 1 and leassons using MOV 1 and leassons using MOV 1 and MOV was shown
plans with COTs that
Efficiency supported by any 1of the supported by any 1of the supported by any 1of the 5
other given MOV other given MOV other given MOV observed based on
objective 1 of KRA 1
Timeliness Used different
2 Used a range of Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different No acceptable evidence teaching strategies
teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that was shown that enhance
teaching
promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing
strategies that and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as learnesrs
enhance learner Quality shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a achievement in 5
achievement in rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 litersacy and
literacy and May numeracy skills as
numeracy skills. 2018 to shown in COTs with a
7.5% rating of 7
5 0.375
April Submitted at least 4 learner- Submitted at least 3 learner- Submitted at least 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner- No acceptable evidence
2019 centered lessons as shown centered lessons as shown centered lessons as shown centered lesson as was shown Submitted 4 lesson
in MOV 1 and supported by in MOV 1 and supported by in MOV 1 and supported by evidently shown in any 1 of
Efficiency any 1 of the other MOV any 1 of the other MOV any 1 of the other MOV the given MOV 5
given given given observed based on
Timeliness
3 Applied a range Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching No acceptable evidence
strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop was shown Applied knowledge of
of teaching critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking critical and creative thinking
strategies to and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS as
content within and
develop critical Quality shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a accross subject areas 5
and creative rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 as shown in 4 COTs
thinkling, as well May with a rating of 7
as other higher- 2018 to 7.5% 5 0.375
order thinking April
skills. 2019
and creative
thinkling, as well May
as other higher- 2018 to 7.5% 5 0.375
order thinking April Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted at least 3 lessons Submitted at least 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable evidence
skills. 2019 as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by any 1 of the was shown Submitted 4 lesson
supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the given MOV plans with COTs that 5
Efficiency other given MOV other given MOV other given MOV
observed based on
Timeliness
E
WEIGHT
IN
EL
PER KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE
M
TI
2. LEARNING 4 Managed classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable evidence Applied knowledge of
ENVIRONMENT structure to engage management strategies that management strategies that management strategies that management strategies that was shown
content within and
AND DIVERSITY learners, individually engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
OF LEARNERS or in groups, in Quality activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in accross subject areas 5
meaningful MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4 as shown in 4 COTs
explanation, May with a rating of 7
discovery and hands-
2018 to
on activities within a 7.5% Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable evidence
5 0.375
range of physical April Submitted 4 lesson
supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by any of the was shown
learning 2019 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV plans with COTs that
environments. Efficiency 5
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV observed based on
Timeliness
Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable evidence
Used different
5 Managed learner teaching strategies
management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of was shown
behavior that enhance
learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that
constructively by promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non- learnesrs
applying positive Quality violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown
achievement in 5
and non-violent in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a
May rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 litersacy and
discipline to numeracy skills as
ensure learning- 2018 to 7.5% shown in COTs with a 5 0.375
focused April
2019 rating of 7
environments. Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 3 of the Submitted at least 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence
Submitted 4 lesson
given strategies as given strategies as given strategies as given strategies as was shown
Efficiency observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in only 1 lesson plans with COTs that 5
lessons observed based on
Timeliness
6 Used Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated No acceptable evidence
teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to shown
Applied knowledge of
differentiated, content within and
address learner diversity as address learner diversity as address learner diversity as address learner diversity as
developmentally Quality shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a accross subject areas 5
appropriate rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 as shown in 4 COTs
learning with a rating of 7
experiencce to May
address 2018 to
learner's gender, April 7.5% 5 0.375
needs, 2019
strengths,
interests and
experiences.
appropriate
learning
experiencce to May Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable evidence
address 2018 to differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching shown
learner's gender, April 7.5% strategies in at least 2 strategies in at least 2 strategies in at least 2 strategy in only 1 lesson as No acceptable evidence 5 0.375
needs, leassons as evidenced by lessons as evidenced by lessons as evidenced by evidently shown in any 1 of was shown Submitted 4 lesson
2019 plans with COTs that
strengths, Efficiency MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by the acceptable MOV 5
interests and
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other observed based on
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV objective 3 of KRA 1
experiences.
Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Planned, managed RATING
E
WEIGHT
IN
and implemented
EL
M
TI
3 CURRICULUM 7. Planned, managed Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented No acceptable evidence developmentally
AND PLANNING and implemented developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced was shown sequenced teaching
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
developmentally and learning
Quality process as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in MOV 1 5
sequenced processes to meet
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
teaching and curriculum
learning processes
requirements and
to meet curriculum May Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable evidence
requirements and 2018 to varied teaching
developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced was shown
varied teaching 7.5% teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
contexts. 5 0.375
April Submitted 4 lesson
contexts. process as evidently shown process as evidently shown process as evidently shown process as evidently shown
2019 plans with COTs that
Efficiency in MOV 1 and supported by in MOV 1 and supported by in MOV 1 and supported by in any 1 of the given MOV 5
any 1 of the other given any 1 of the other given any 1 of the other given observed based on
MOV MOV MOV objective 7 of KRA 3
Timeliness
8 Participated in Consistently participated in Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in No acceptable evidence
Participated in
collegial LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to was shown
discussions that discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner collegial discussions
feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich that use teacher and
use teacher and Quality 5
instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the
learner feedback learner feedback to
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
to enrich teaching May enrich teaching
practice. 2018 to practice
7.5% 5 0.375
April Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated 1 LAC/FGD/ No acceptable evidence Participated in 4 LACs
2019 LACs/ FGDs/meetings as LACs/FGDs/ meetings as LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meeting as evidently shown was shown meeting as evidently
Efficiency evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the given MOV
shown in any of the 5
the given MOV the given MOV the given MOV
given MOV collegial
discussion that use
Timeliness
Developed and used
9 Selected, Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied No acceptable evidence
varied teaching and
developed, teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning was shown
organized, and resources including ICT, to resources including ICT, to resources including ICT, to resources including ICT, to learning resources
used appropriate Quality address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as including ICT to 5
shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
teaching and address learning
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
learning goals as shown in
resources, May COTs
including ICT, to 2018 to
7.5% 5 0.375
address learning April
goals. 2019
teaching and
learning
resources, May
2018 to Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied teaching Submitted 2 varied teaching Submitted any teaching and No acceptable evidence
including ICT, to 7.5% 5 0.375
teaching and learning and learning resources and learning resources learning resource including was shown
address learning April resources including ICT, as including ICT, as evidently including ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently shown in Submitted 4 lesson
goals. 2019 evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and any of the acceptable MOV plans with COTs that
Efficiency and supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the 5
the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
observed based on
Timeliness
E
WEIGHT
IN
EL
M
TI
4. ASSESSMENT 10. Designed, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable evidence
AND organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used was shown Designed, selected
selected,
REPORTING diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and diagnostic, formative and organized and used
organized and summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment diagnostic, formative
used diagnostic, strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as
and summative
formative and Quality 4
shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a asssessment
summative May rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 strategies consistent
assessment 2018 to
7.5% with curriculum 4.5 0.338
strategies April requirements.
consistent with 2019
curriculum Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 assessment No acceptable evidence
Submitted 4 lesson
requirements. assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tools as tool as evidently shown in was shown
Efficiency evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of any of the acceptable MOV 5
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV observed based on
objective 10 KRA 4
Timeliness
11. Monitored and Consistently monitored and Frequently monitored and Occasionally monitored and Rarely monitored and No acceptable evidence Monitoredand
evaluated evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress was shown evaluated learner
and achievement using and achievement using and achievement using and achievement using progress and
learner progress Quality learner attainment data as learner attainment data as learner attainment data as learner attainment data as 5
and shown in MOV submitted shown in MOV submitted shown in MOV submitted shown in MOV submitted achievement using
achievement May learner attainment
using learner 2018 to data
7.5% Submitted 4 lesson 4.667 0.350
attainment data. April Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted 1 acceptable No acceptable evidence
2019 at least 4 of the acceptable 3 of the acceptable MOV 2 of the acceptable MOV MOV was shown plans with COTs that
Efficiency 5
MOV observed based on
objective 10 KRA 4
Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable evidence Submitted MOV were
Timeliness distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 quarter was shown 4
quarters quarters quarters
distributed across 4
12. Communicated Consistently showed prompt Frequently showed prompt Occasionally showed Rarely showed prompt and No acceptable evidence
promptly and and clear communication of and clear communication of prompt and clear clear communication of the was shown Communicated
clearly the
the learner's needs, the learner's needs, communication of the learner's needs, progress promptly and clearly
progress and achievement progress and achievement learner's needs, progress and achievement to key
learner's needs, the learners needs,
to key stakeholders, to key stakeholders, and achievement to key stakeholders, including
progress and including parents/ guardians including parents/ guardians stakeholders, including parents/ guardians as progress and
achievement to
Quality as shown in the MOV as shown in the MOV parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV achievement to key 5
key May
submitted submitted shown in the MOV submitted stakeholdres,
submitted
stakeholders, 2018 to including
7.5% parents/guardians as 3 0.225
including April
parents/ 2019 shown in MOV
guardians
12. Communicated
DIANA M.
Name of Employee: promptly and GUARINO Name of Rater: ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON
Position: clearly theI
Teacher Position: Master Teacher II
District/School: learner's
San Miguelneeds,
Heights Elementary School Date of Review: APRIL 2019
progress and
achievement to
key May TO BE FILLED OUT DURING
2018 to TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING
stakeholders, EVALUATION
7.5% 3 0.225
including April PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
E
WEIGHT
IN
KRAs OBJECTIVES
parents/ 2019 PER KRA ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
EL
M
TI
guardians Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted a combination of Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence Submitted a
at least 4 of the acceptable 3 of the acceptable MOV 2 of the acceptable MOV given MOV was shown combination of 4 of 2
Efficiency
MOV the acceptable MOV
of KRA 4 objective
Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable evidence Submitted MOV were
Timeliness distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 quarter was shown 2
quarters quarters quarters distributed across 4

E
WEIGHT
IN
EL
PER KRA
M
TI
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed various No acceptable evidence
various related various related various related related works/activities that was shown Performed various
various related works/activities that works/activities that works/activities that contribute to the teaching-
works/activities contribute to the teaching- contribute to the teaching- contribute to the teaching- learning process as shown
related
that contribute to learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown in the MOV submitted works/activities that 5
Quality
the teaching- May in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted contribute to the
learning process 2018 to teaching learning
10% process 5 0.500
April
2019
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different kinds Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence Submitted 4 different
different kinds of acceptable of acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV was shown
Efficiency
MOV kinds of acceptable 5
MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.788
Description: Outstanding
ADJECTIVAL RATING
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor
Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON DIANA M. GUARINO RIZZA D. ESCOBIDO
Master Teacher II Teacher I Principal II
COT Rating
KRA 1 : CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY
COT Rating
Objectives COT Rating Sheet RPMS 5-point Scale
(Highly Proficient Teachers)
1. Applied knowledge of content
within and across curriculum COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5
teaching areas.
COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4
Total 18
Average 5
COT Rating
2. Used a range of teaching
strategies that enhance learner COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5
achievement in literacy and
numeracy skills. COT Rating Sheet 2 7 5
Total 20
Average 5
COT Rating
3. Applied a range of teaching
strategies to develop critical and COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5
creative thinkling, as well as other
higher-order thinking skills. COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4
Total 19
Average 5
COT Rating
KRA 2 : Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners
COT Rating
4. Managed classroom structure to
engage learners, individually or in COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5
groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities
within a range of physical learning COT Rating Sheet 2 7 5
environments.
Total 20
Average 5
COT Rating
5. Managed learner behavior
constructively by applying positive COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5
and non-violent discipline to
ensure learning-focused
environments. COT Rating Sheet 2 7 5
Total 20
Average 5
COT Rating
6. Used differentiated,
developmentally appropriate COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5
learning experiences to address
learners' gender, needs, strengths, COT Rating Sheet 2
interests and experiences.
COT Rating Sheet 4
Total 9
Average 5
COT Rating
KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning
COT Rating
7. Planned, managed and
implemented developmentally COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5
sequenced teaching and learning
processes to meet curriculum
requirements and varied teaching COT Rating Sheet 2 7 5
contexts.
Total 19
Average 5
COT Rating
9. Selected, developed, organized
and used appropriate teacing and COT Rating Sheet 1
learning resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals. COT Rating Sheet 2 7 5
COT Rating Sheet 3
COT Rating Sheet 4
Total 5
Average 5
COT Rating
KRA 4: Assessment and Reporting
COT Rating
10. Designed, selected, organized
and used diagnostic, formative and COT Rating Sheet 1
summative assessment strategies
consistent with curriculum COT Rating Sheet 2
requirements.
COT Rating Sheet 3
Total 4
Average 4
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
1 CONTENT 1 Applied knowledge of 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

KNOWLEDGE content within and sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
across curricuoum form about knowledge of content within and
AND
teaching areas. across subject areas
PEDAGOGY
2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed

highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas
3 Instructional materials highlighting mastery

of content and its integration in other
subject areas
4 Performance tasks/test materials

highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas
5 Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
2 Used a range of 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

teaching strategies sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
that enhance learner form about teaching strategies that
achievement in enhance learner achievement in literacy
literacy and numeracy and numeracy skills
skills.
2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

teaching highlighting learner-centered
strategies that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3 Instructional materials highlighting learner-

centered strategies that promote literacy
and/or numeracy skills
4 Performance tasks/test material(s) used in

teaching
5 Results of assessment used in teaching

annotations)
3 Applied a range of 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

teaching strategies to sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
develop critical and form about teaching strategies to develop
creative thinkling, as critical and creative thinking, as well as
well as other higher- other higher-order thinking skills
order thinking skills.
2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

teaching highlighting learner-centered
strategies that develop critical and creative
thinking, and/or other HOTS
3 Applied a range of
teaching strategies to
develop critical and
creative thinkling, as
well as other higher-
order thinking skills.
REMARKS
VALID INVALID
3 Instructional materials highlighting different

teaching strategies that develop critical and
creative thinking, and/or other HOTS
4 Performance tasks/test material(s) used in

demonstration teaching
5 Results of assessment used in teaching

annotations)
REMARKS
VALID INVALID
2 LEARNING 4 Managed classroom 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

ENVIRONMENT structure to engage sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
learners, individually form about managing classroom structure
AND DIVERSITY
or in groups, in that engages learners in various activities
OF LEARNERS meaningful
explanation,
discovery and hands- 2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
on activities within a various classroom management strategies
range of physical that engage learners in activities/tasks in
learning different physical learning environments
environments.
annotations)
5 Managed learner Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

behavior sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
constructively by form about teacher management of learner
applying positive and behavior using the following strategies:
non-violent discipline
to ensure learning-
focused 1 Providing motivation
environments.
2 Praising the learners/Giving positive

feedback
3 Setting house rules/guidelines
4 Ensuring learner's active participation
5 Allowing learners to express their

ideas/opinions
6 Giving equal opportunities to learners
7 Encouraging learners to asks questions

annotations)
6 Used differentiated, 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

developmentally sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
appropriate learning form about using differentiated,
experiencce to developmentally appropriate learning
address learner's experiences
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences. 2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed
highlighting differentiation in content,
product, process, learning environment or
others according to learners' gender,
needs, strengths, interests and
experiences
6 Used differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate learning
experiencce to
address learner's
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.
REMARKS
VALID INVALID
3 Instructional materials highlighting

differentiation in content, product, process,
learning environment or others according to
learners' gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences

annotations)
REMARKS
VALID INVALID
3 CURRICULUM 7 Planned, managed 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

AND PLANNING and implemented sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
developmentally form about using developmentally
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching and learning process
and learning
processes to meet
curriculumrequiremen 2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed
ts and varied teaching highlighting developmetally sequenced
contents. instruction that meet curriculum goals and
varied teaching contexts
3 Instructional materials used to implement

developmetally sequenced instruction that
meet curriculum goals and varied teaching
contexts

annotations)
8 Participated in 1 Personal notes of teachers on

collegial discussions LAC/FGDs/meetings with proof of
that use teacher and attendance
learner feedback to
enrich teaching
2 Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
practice.
teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice with proof of attendance

annotations)
9 Selected, developed, 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

organized, and used sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
appropriate teaching form about using appropriate teaching and
and learning learning resources, including ICT
resources, including
ICT, to address
learning goals. Examples: Activity sheets/tasks
sheets/work sheets, powerpoint
presentations, video clips, module, SIMs-
Strategic Intervention Matertials, Other
2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs with

apprropriate instructional materials
appended

annotations)
REMARKS
VALID INVALID
4 ASSESMENT ### Designed, selected, 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

AND organized and used sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
diagnostic, formative form about using diagnostic, formative and
REPORTING
and summative summative assessment startegies
assessment
strategies consistent
with curriculum 2 Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs
requirements. highlighting appropriate use of formative
assessment strategies
3 Develop diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS

reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished questionaire/answer sheets
4 Develop summative tests: (a) with TOS

accomplished questionaire/answer sheets
5 Develop performance tasks: (a) with rubrics

accomplished rubrics

annotations)
11 Monitored and 1 Compilation of learner's written work with

evaluated learner summary of results and with signature of
progress and parents
achievement using
learner attainment
2 Formative/summative assessment tools
data.
with TOS and frequency of errors with
identified least mastered skills
3 Class records/grading sheets
4 Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing index

of mastery

annotations)
### Communicated 1 At least 3 samples of corrected test papers

promptly and clearly of the same 3 learners innthe same
the learner's needs, learning area with parents' or guardians'
progress and signature and date of receipt
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/ 2 Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher
guardians conferences in all quarters with proof of
parents'/guardians' attendance
3 Report cards with parent's or guardian's

signature in all quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4 Communication with parents/guardians

using various modalities
5 Anecdotal record showing entries per

quarter
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians
REMARKS
VALID INVALID
6 Other documents showing learner needs,

progress and achievement submitted to
other stakeholders
REMARKS
VALID INVALID
5 PLUS FACTOR ### Performed various 1 Certificate of Recognition or Participation

related
works/activities that
contribute to the
teaching-learning
2 Certificate of Training
process
3 Certificate of Speakership
4 Committee involvement
5 Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
6 Book or Journal Authorship/Co-

authorship/Contributorship
7 Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
8 Coaching and mentoring learners in

competitions
9 Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers

annotations)
COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management Teamwork
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 1 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into account 2 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. organization.
3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
5 3 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals. 4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. 5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organizational goals and objectives.
Professionalism and Ethics

1 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Service Orientation
public officials and employee (RA 6713).
1 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her 2 Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer service issues and concerns.
actions and decisions.
3 Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, good
grooming and communication. 4 3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
1
4 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies based on DepEd strategies
and directions.
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, improves systems 5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further
and help others improve their effectiveness. enhance service delivery.
Result Focus Innovation

1 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 1 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas, processes,
and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs
before personal needs.
2 Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on improving personal
productivity to create higher value and results.
3 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures
correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required. 3 Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
2 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization. 5
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability
to succeed with minimal resources.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples
may include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality,
costumer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY
3.50
RATINGS
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
STRENGTHS DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ACTION PLAN TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED

(Recommended Developmetal Intervention)
A. Functional Competencies
B. Core Behavioral Competencies
Feedback:
Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:
DIANA M. GUARINO ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON RIZZA D. ESCOBIDO
Teacher I Master Teacher II Principal II
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PER RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV PERFORMANCE TARGET
KRA RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
*Please see attached list of MOV
Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:

DIANA M. GUARINO ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON RIZZA D. ESCOBIDO
Teacher I Master Teacher II Principal II
PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING F
DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT

ACHING FORM
SIGNATURE
IMPACT ON JOB/ ACTION PLAN (Rater/Ratee)
ANNOTATION
DESCRIPTION OF THE MOV

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF VERIFICATION PRESENTED
N
ANNOTATIONS

Ipcrf 2019 Yani

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Ipcrf 2019 Yani

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: DIANA M. GUARINO

Brought to you by: WARLY I. SALIDO

Name of Rater: ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON

Name of Employee: DIANA M. GUARINO Name of Rater: ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING

Name of Employee: DIANA M. GUARINO Name of Rater: ANNABELLE M. ROMBAON

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 4.788

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

KRA 1 : CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

COT Rating Sheet 3 6 4

COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 3 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 3 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5

KRA 2 : Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners

COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 3 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 3 6 4

COT Rating Sheet 4

KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning

COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 3

COT Rating Sheet 4

KRA 4: Assessment and Reporting

COT Rating Sheet 3

COT Rating Sheet 4 6 4

1 CONTENT 1 Applied knowledge of 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed

3 Instructional materials highlighting mastery

4 Performance tasks/test materials

5 Others (Please specify and provide

2 Used a range of 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

3 Instructional materials highlighting learner-

4 Performance tasks/test material(s) used in

5 Results of assessment used in teaching

6 Others (Please specify and provide

3 Applied a range of 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

2 Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

3 Instructional materials highlighting different

4 Performance tasks/test material(s) used in

5 Results of assessment used in teaching

6 Others (Please specify and provide

2 LEARNING 4 Managed classroom 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

5 Managed learner Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

2 Praising the learners/Giving positive

3 Setting house rules/guidelines

4 Ensuring learner's active participation

5 Allowing learners to express their

6 Giving equal opportunities to learners

7 Encouraging learners to asks questions

8 Others (Please specify and provide

6 Used differentiated, 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

3 Instructional materials highlighting

4 Others (Please specify and provide

3 CURRICULUM 7 Planned, managed 1 Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

3 Instructional materials used to implement

4 Others (Please specify and provide

8 Participated in 1 Personal notes of teachers on

3 Others (Please specify and provide