Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Andean Puna
Author(s): Benjamin Sebastian Orlove
Review by: Benjamin Sebastian Orlove
Source: Nomadic Peoples, No. 8 (May 1981), pp. 27-34
Published by: White Horse Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43123990
Accessed: 05-11-2015 13:27 UTC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
White Horse Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Nomadic Peoples.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 27 -
Several new studies have been published in the last few years on
Andean populations which live at elevations about 4200 m above sea level
of alpacas and llamas. The first studies of these groups were published
only fifteen years ago (Flores, 1964; Nachtigall, 1966). The more recent
ones described here share a tone of enthusiasm and urgency in their
descriptions of the complex ecological adaptations, forms of social
organization and economic strategies of these groups. In addition to
detailed descriptions of the herders, these studies challenge the
subordinate position of the herders within national society and
political systems. This review offers a summary of the new works, an
analysis of their themes, and a critique of their perspective.
The three works (referred to as Flores, 1977, Allpanchis 8, and
Palacios Rios 1977) demonstrate the recent development of social science
in Peru. It is worth noticing the institutionalization of social science.
The Instituto de Estudios Peruanos has been publishing several series of
monographs and edited works in the social sciences, and the Instituto de
Pastoral Andina works with the Catholic Church in the southern highlands
to develop social action programs among peasant populations. It also
publishes the journal, Allpanchis Phuturinqa, which examines social
organization, symbolism and ritual among the Indian peasantry of the
southern highlands. The National Catholic University has one of the
most significant and innovative graduate programs in Peru, where British
social anthropology has been integrated into the body of Peruvian
anthropology. In all these institutions, there is a collaboration between
Peruvian and foreign scholars, between archaeologists, anthropologists
and historians. All of them try to bring together general theoretical
issues in social science and more concrete studies in Andean social
conditions, and all of them confront in one way or another a sharp
division between Marxist and indigenistas , between those who apply
general theories and Andean area specialists.
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 28 -
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 29 -
roent pattern, daily and annual cycles of herd management, and the
exchange of pastoral products with agricultural ones from lower zones.
They particularly emphasize the distinction between the relatively
abundant pasture which occurs during the rainy season and the much
scarcer dry season pasture. The latter occurs in areas which remain
moist throughout the year. The access to these scarce dry season
pastures, known as bofedales, is a major theme which runs through the
discussion of the Andean herding complex. The authors disagree on the
limits of the environment. Palacios Rios. indicates the possibility of
increasing the carrying capacity of the puna through irrigation, while
Thomas insists, I believe incorrectly, on showing the puna as a fixed
background against which society and culture develop. He also insists
that ecological factors are not only important but are the sole
determinant of the way of life of the herders.
2) Social Organization. Ecology influences social life as much as
it influences herding practices. The dispersed settlement pattern is
related with the patrilineal system of descent which serves to control
and regulate access to herds and to pasture. The formation of new
domestic units implies the division of previous units and these changes
generate conflicts which Flores and Palacios Rios analyze. Community
organization also serves to defend rights to pastureland. Extra local
contacts are important particularly because they permit access to
agricultural products.
3) Interzonal Exchange. One aspect of ecological adaptation
and social organization which has received a great deal of attention
is the system of relations which herders maintain with agricultural
peasants in other zones, such as the Pacific coast, Andean valleys,
and the altiplano, or flat plains which surround Lake Titicaca. In
contrast with market relations, interzonal contacts are long-lasting,
and the rates of exchange are relatively fixed without the marked
variation of market prices (Flores and Najar, 1976) . The authors
admire the herders who are willing to take long journeys, some of
which last several weeks, across hostile, barren areas. They also are
impressed by the networks of exchange. Some herders go from the high
punas to exchange wool weavings and meat on the Peruvian coast for
coastal products, such as fruit and hot peppers, which they then take
to the Andean valleys to exchange with tubers and grains. The authors
also agree that the herders could sell their wool and meat at much higher
prices than the equivalent of what they receive in agricultural products
through barter. They disagree, however, when they try to explain the
motivation of the herders. Some of them find a set of mentalities and
values which are very different from those of Western economies (moral
sanctions make it impossible for herders to refuse to offer their
products to agricultural peasants) , while others emphasize different
institutions (the insecurity of the market influences the herders who
prefer the barter exchange relations because they are less risky, even
through they may also be less profitable) . The authors also disagree
on the character of the relations between herders and agriculturalists.
Some of them, like Casaverde, describe them as secure, while Concha
Contreras indicates that both groups frequently have difficulty in
maintaining these relations. He also says that the exchange rates are
more variable than Casaverde suggests. It would be difficult to
resolve this disagreement without taking into account the differences
in theoretical orientation and the regional variations in the two areas
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 30 -
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 31 -
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 32 -
but the tendency to look for continuities and not consider articulations
with other sectors is very clear.
These tendencies form part of a break between Marxists and
indigenistas . The latter may be defined as those who strongly support
the native Indian populations in contrast to all other groups and find
in them an unequalled source of cultural and political strength. The
indigenistas/ primarily Andean area specialists, may be quite correct
in noticing that much Marxist debate is relatively sterile, unwilling
to analyse concrete cases, and marked by a tendency to reduce complex
socioeconomic formations to limited categories. But they also commit
dangerous omissions, such as the ones mentioned above of not locating
the herders within their wider social, economic and political contexts,
or failing to take Marxist themes, such as internal differentation of
peasant communities. This latter point is very important because there
are strong inequalities in the size of herds within herding communities.
The wealthy herders have a series of profitable forms which allow them
to obtain the labor force which they need. There has been very little
discussion of internal conflicts within communities, except with the
case of intergenerational conflicts (Palacios Rios, 1977) . One may
expect, however, a rapprochement between these two orientations, as
shown in the books in the Peru Problema series of the Institute of the
Estudios Peruanos and the research publications of the Peruvian Catholic
University. (The case of the Instituto Pastoral Andina is even more
notable. In their journal one can see the consequence of decisions of
certain southern Peruvian bishops and priests to adopt certain political
positions. And the recent double issue of Allpanchis on peasant
movements indicates an effort to relate ideology and symbolism with
economic and political bases) .
These reflections allow one to establish priorities for future
research among herders. Debate between the importance of continuities
and change among herders should be replaced with a true history of the
herders, which would simultaneously recognize the presence and strength
of the Andean herding complex and also locate the herders in their wider
social, economic and political context. The study of Bolivian herders
would change the overemphasis on Peruvian ones, and it would also bring
a concrete understanding of the influence of national economic policies.
Some tendencies in this direction may already be noticed: Mejia' s
interest in examining the way in which the articulation of herders with
other economic sectors reproduces the relations of production of the
herders, and several isolated but significant facts with Concha Contreras
presents (the organization of llama caravan drivers to present petitions
to the Peruvian National Bank to allow them to use salt mines without
paying certain taxes, the active role of village authorities in
establishing the rates of exchange between pastoral and agricultural
products); Flores' suggestion for the study of relations between
communities and haciendas. The advances of the works described here
should be utilized and continued. Ecology, social organization, inter-
zonal exchange and ritual, all deserve more research and the present
works may serve well as a basis for such future work. One might suggest
a comparative analysis between the herders of the eastern and western
cordilleras to see the influence of the different ecologies there, since
the western cordillera is considerably drier. Inheritance, access to
labor, techniques of herding and of pasture irrigation are elements which
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 33 -
are not yet as well understood as one might wish. What one could hope for
would be a synthesis between the particularizing successes of the studies
which have already been completed and the possibilities of a more historic
vision which might come out of the field research which is going on at the
present moment, done by researchers such as Deborah Caro, Jorge Flores,
and Felix Palacios Rios. Concretely, one might take advantage of the
fact that political and ecological boundaries do not coincide to study
the importance of these factors of the herders in Peru and Bolivia and
the east and west cordilleras with regard to the impact of agrarian
reform, involvement in market economy and wage-labor economies, and the
role of the governmental agencies.
To return to the beginning of the review, the tone of enthusiasm
and urgency is well deserved. The enthusiasm comes from the new
discoveries of the adaptations and forms of organization which previously
had not been studied and one must recognize the importance of the recent
studies of herders in récent review articles on Andean social organization
(Alberti and Mayer, 1974; Bolton and Mayer, 1977) . Flores is distinguished
as a pioneer in these studies. The Andean herding complex provokes this
enthusiasm. The urgency comes from other motives. For some writers,
it is a desire to preserve customs, myths, and rituals before they
disappear under the steady onslaught of Westernization. For others, it
comes from the new domination of the state on herding zones. Some
indigenistas take as their task recording of a culture. Other writers
are more aware of the implicit criticism of this ethnographic activity
and are more concerned with political and cultural reawakening. As
Matos Mar proposes in his introduction to Flores 1977, the study of the
herders and understanding of the Indian " contributes to
herding complex
the perception of the possibility of an alternative model of what role
development should be in the country and it is also necessary or orient
any panorama of change." This goal is still in its first steps of
realization. The study of the Andean herding complex could lead to an
analysis of the history of the herders and of their economic and political
relations with state systems. Without these elements, the works will
remain incomplete and partially wrong. With them, they could contribute
a much greater understanding of herding peoples, not only in the Andes,
but throughout the world.
References
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
- 34 -
This content downloaded from 165.123.34.86 on Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:27:44 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions