DESIGN COMPETITION

GUIDE
JAN 2019

International Industry-Academia Partnership Program/

Royal Academy of Engineering
[blank]
Contents
Aim and Objectives 3
Background & Context 4
Site Description 5
Procedure8
Team Introduction 9
Review Panel 11
Submission Requirements  15
Design Criteria 17
Assessment Criteria 20
Resources21
Glossary22
Appendix A 25
Appendix B 29

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 2

Aim and Objectives
The competition seeks entrants to create designs
The purpose of the competition is to design
which demonstrate inspiring solutions, addressing
a sustainable and resilient material hub and
technical considerations for sustainable design,
integrated community masterplan to demonstrate
vernacular and natural materials, climate-
best practice community waste management for
proofing, energy efficiency and renewable
local communities in vulnerable coastal Indonesia.
energy. The material hub facility is aimed at
Every entrant will be part of an international
providing local community infrastructure and
multi-disciplinary design team for the competition,
the designs should present a new standard in
and be able to gain valuable experience in
community waste management to be used for
working practice for real-life design challenges.
learning and reference by other communities
The project will include virtual BIM collaboration,
across Indonesia and other equatorial regions. In
with international teams from Institut Teknologi
addition to the design of a material hub, teams
Bandung (ITB) and London South Bank University
are tasked with considering education of the
(LSBU).
community and highlighting the importance of
waste separation at source to allow for successful
The material hub should serve as a model best
reuse and recycling. The aim is to demonstrate
practice waste management facility for Indonesia.
solutions which will have a positive social,
As well as providing a location for sorting and
economic and environmental impact, including
processing waste, the hub should offer a learning
significant reductions in plastic pollution to
environment for the local community and tourists
oceans, enhancement of the tourist economy and
to understand the whole picture of good practice
improvements to community health in Indonesia.
waste management and the roles every member
The Material Hub concept presents an exciting
of society has within the material loop, including
opportunity to help in repositioning ‘waste’ as a
reducing waste and separating waste at source.
valuable material resource.

3 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

Background & Context
Indonesia ranks second in the world as a polluter
of plastic to oceans, with over 80% of Indonesia’s
waste mismanaged, by comparison to 2% in the
USA (Science Journal Vol. 347). An estimated
1.29 million tons out of Indonesia’s 3.2 million
tons plastic waste consumed in 2010 ended up
in the ocean, impacting on tourism as well as
communities.
The Indonesian President made an impressive
and ambitious pledge last year to reduce marine
litter by 70 per cent by 2025, which has sparked
a lot of positive momentum towards making big
changes. The pledge took place at the world
Ocean Summit in Bali, as part of the ‘#cleanseas’
campaign, a global UN campaign to eliminate
major sources of marine litter (23 February 2017,
http://web.unep.org). At the same time as this
waste reduction commitment, Indonesia aims to
double it’s Tourism sector to 8% of GDP by 2019.
Tourism is closely correlated with increased waste
and coastal areas are a focus for expansion of
tourism, in addition to an already huge a coastal
population of 187.2 million. Indonesia also has
a fast growing economy, whereby more waste is
being produced as consumption increases.
The high percentage of Indonesia’s waste
entering the oceans is largely due to the lack of
comprehensive waste management across the
Archipelago, however is it a monumental task
for the Government establish comprehensive
waste management infrastructure across 6000
inhabited islands with a population of over
240 million - the 4th largest population on the
planet. This Material Hub design competition
is supporting solutions for this world-changing
challenge, as part of an International Academic
Partnership Program (IAPP) with the Royal
Academy of Engineering. The IAPP seeks to help
by offering demonstrations and examples of best-
practice solutions using international expertise
from Industry and Academia.
In the first year the IAPP program focused on
research and action in Batukaras village which
involved community workshops, mentoring and
the generation of a framework model for other
communities to be able to follow. This design
competition for Material Hub is part of the second
year IAPP program, leading on from the first year’s
work which identified the need for a location to
process waste as the biggest stumbling block
towards mobilising local waste management
solutions in the Batukaras area.
With such a high percentage of mismanaged
waste and enormous coastal population,
combined with the commitment to reduce waste
pollution whilst increasing tourism, the delivery of
comprehensive waste management infrastructure.
COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 4
Site Description
The competition is focused on the south coast
of West Java, in an area called Pangandaran.
Pangandaran is a regency within the province
of West Java on the island of Java, which is
Indonesia’s most populated Island, with around
140 million inhabitants. Pangandaran is a very
popular tourist destination a very significant
area of focus for economic and tourism
development for Indonesia. Batukaras is a village
within Pangandaran which is a very population
destination for international tourists and surfers
and is identified as having particularly great
potential for sustainable tourism. Batukaras is
selected as a United Nations Sustainable Tourism
Observatory within Pangandaran region, part of a
project managed by ITB University.

THE COMPETITION SITES:

Two sites have been identified to address design

solutions at different scales. Teams will be
allocated one of the following locations:

• Desa [Village] - Margacinta

• Kabupaten [Region] - Bojong Salaweh serving
Pangandaran

5 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

A. DESA LEVEL MATERIAL HUB
Serving Margacinta
Margacinta village is one of the seven villages
located in Ciijulang sub district, Ciamis Regency,
Pangandaran district in West Java. Margacinta
has a population of 3,218 people and generates
2.759 ton/day (refer to Appendicies for detailed
data). The area of the Margacinta village is
1,442.070 hectare which consists of Paddy fields
(256.997 ha) and Dry Land including; yard (224
ha), community forestry (876.39 ha), cemetary
(11.65 ha), fisheries pond (17.86 ha), and cattle
grazing field (30.47).
A piece of government-owned land in the village of
Margacinta has been identified by the local Kantor
Desa (village office) for use as the Desa-scale
material hub competition site. The Kantor Desa
have offered to undertake land-reclamation to the
existing site in order to reclaim an area of fishpond
to give a bigger and more convenient site for a
material hub facility. The land has good access
and is fairly flat.
MAP COORDINATES: 7°42’29.8”S 108°29’31.0”E
3D DRONE AERIAL VIEW OF THE DESA SITE CAN BE FOUND HERE: HTTPS://
BIT.LY/2SYCPBZ AND SCALE CAD MAPS AVAILABLE ON SHARED ONLINE
DRIVE
COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 6
B. KABUPATEN LEVEL MATERIAL HUB
Bojong Salaweh site serving Pangandaran
Pangandaran Regency was recently created in the
West Java province, Indonesia. It was formed on
25th October 2012 out of the Southern portion
of Ciamis Regency. The population of this area
as of the 2010 Census was 383.848 and the
centre of Pangandaran, close to the beach. The
regency government office have identified this
publicly owned land as being a suitable option to
consider for a waste management facility location.
MAP COORDINATES 7°41’48.7”S 108°31’11.7”E
3D DRONE AERIAL VIEW OF THE PARTICULAR SITE CAN BE FOUND HERE
HTTPS://BIT.LY/2RZXVFW AND SCALE CAD MAPS AVAILABLE ON SHARED
ONLINE DRIVE

administrative capital is Parigi. The regency

contains a beach called Pantai Pangandaran
(Pangandaran beach) and Cukang Taneuh Canyon
(Green Canyon). More info can be found here
https://bit.ly/2TrL8L1

The largest of the material hub facilities is to serve

the whole regency (kabupaten) of Pangandaran.
The site identified for this facility is in a location
called Bojong Salawe, which is approximately
halfway between Batukaras village and the town

7 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

Procedure
PARTNER TEAMS
Project teams will be formed including participants
from both ITB and LSBU. Teams will be from
multi-disciplinary backgrounds, whereby the group
is encouraged to utilise each team member’s
strengths and knowledge to influence the design
solution.
Each team will be assigned a mentor. Team
meetings should take place weekly. Mentors
will join the meetings fortnightly if invited or be
available for a fortnightly conference call.
Project initiation workshops will take place at
ITB at the beginning of January with input from
Industry partners and University team members.
Brainstorming and briefing sessions will take
place at the ITB workshops. Recordings of these
workshops will be made available online so that
LSBU students will have access to the information
when they join the project later in January.
CERTIFICATES AND RECOGNITION
Participants will receive three certificates:
1. Completion of Competition
2. CPD - BIM multi-disciplinary collaborative
working
3. CPD - International Technical Collaboration
All submitted competition entries will form part
of a public exhibition which will be displayed
at the environmental learning hub Bale Tau in
Batukaras village, Indonesia. There will also be a
presentation event at Bale Tau which will present
the designs to Local and Regional Government.
The winning designs will be promoted for further
detailed development and considered within
proposals for funding the construction of the
Material Hubs.
Winning team designs may be modified for
implementation. The winning team can participate
and join the implementation process.

SCHEDULE
January - March 2019

8th-10th January 2019 ITB Project Kick-off

30th January 2019 LSBU Project Kick-off
15th March 2019 Scheme Design Submittal
27th-28th March 2019 LSBU Scheme Design
Masterclass
1st April 2019 Winner Announced
25th to 28th April 2019 Public Exhibition and
Presentation to Government/Community at Bale
Tau

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 8

Team Introduction
IAPP PARTNERS
Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Institute of technology Bandung (ITB), was
founded on March 2, 1959. The present ITB
main campus is the site of earlier engineering
schools in Indonesia. ITB’s Vision is to become
an outstanding, distinguished, independent, and
worldwide recognized university to lead changes
toward the prosperity of Indonesia and the world.
Founded on October 10, 1962, the Department of
Environmental Engineering (EnvE) is a department
under the Faculty of Civil and Environmental
Engineering. EnvE aims to be a center of science
and technology that builds competitive and
outstanding graduates whose have dignity to
develop technology and management especially
on environmental related matters such as
settlement, urban-rural environment, industry,
mining, and natural environment. Founded
in 1993, The Centre for Tourism Planning
and Development (Pusat Perencanaan dan
Pengembangan Kepariwisataan/P-P2Par) is one
of 20 Center under The Institute for Research
and Community Services coordinated by the Vice
Rector for Research, Innovation and Partnership.
P-P2Par ITB is a pioneer of tourism research
centre in Indonesia and aims to become a node
of academic disciplines and public private sectors
associated with tourism development. This
commitment is translated into efforts to develop
tourism field through academic and applied
researches, dissemination processes in forms of
trainings, seminars/workshops, and publications.
Link to the ITB website and P2Par Centre (where
this project is based at) can be found here and
here.
9 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE
London South Bank University, UK
LSBU was founded in 1892 and currently hosts
approximately 16,000 students. Our success has
been recognised nationally and internationally,
resulting in LSBU being awarded silver rating for
teaching excellence under the UK 2017 Teaching
Excellence Framework (TEF) and rated in the top
three modern universities in London for Research
Impact, with 73% of projects receiving 3* or 4*
(2014- REF). Similarly in 2016, LSBU was named
Entrepreneurial University of the Year in the Times
Higher Education Awards. This award recognised
LSBU’s work and support for 600 local SMEs
and supporting 220 graduate business ideas,
thus boosting growth and creating jobs. LSBU’s
evidence-based education which is underpinned
by recognised applied research and enterprise and
our strong believe in integrated and collaborative
work have resulted in bringing together cross
disciplinary accredited engineering and built
environment courses under one school with now
an internationally renowned nexus of academic
expertise and research in Civil, Architectural
and Building Services Engineering along with
Sustainable Energy, Quantity Surveying, Property
Management and Architecture. Our academics
place considerable importance on students’
experience and contributing to communities,
policy makers and professions within the UK
and internationally. This year we hosted dozens
of visits from representatives of government,
businesses and educational organisations. Link to
the LSBU website and in particular the School of
the Built Environment and Architecture (where this
project is based at) can be found here and here.
CLEAR Community
CLEAR Community have been working to empower
local communities to address waste and plastic
pollution in Indonesia for over 5 years. CLEAR
(Creatively Linking Environment, Art & Resources)
began life as a grassroots initiative in Batukaras
village and is now a registered charity tackling
waste alongside other environmental and
sustainable development challenges. The IAPP
programs of which this design competition forms
a part, were initiated by CLEAR as a way of finding
and sharing solutions for sustainable waste
management to serve the Batukaras area which
could then become models for Indonesia as a
whole.
Mantra
Mantra are an Indonesian green building and
sustainable engineering company that works on
solutions that operate within a safe eco system
boundary. At Mantra everyone dedicates their time
on built environments and solutions that offer a
very high quality experience, with minimal natural
resource needs.
COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019
Atelier Ten
Atelier Ten are an international building
services engineers and environmental
design consultants committed to high-
performance and sustainable design
within the built environment. We use our
imagination, knowledge and experience
to contribute to our clients’ success. By
recognising and analysing opportunities
for improving energy efficiency, water
conservation, visual and thermal comfort,
material selection, and carbon emissions
reductions, we provide integrated, full-service
engineering and consulting on environmental
design, building systems performance
analysis, lighting and daylighting design, fire
engineering, benchmarking, environmental
masterplanning, strategic sustainability
planning, and inter-related services. Our
core objective is to develop well-integrated
buildings with simple systems that work with
natural laws of physics to increase comfort,
reduce energy consumption and contribute
back to the greater environment.
10
Review Panel
Chani Leahong
Environmental Engineer, Clear Community
Chani is Research Program Manager for the IAPP on behalf of LSBU as well
as holding a voluntary role as the Chief Executive and Founder of CLEAR
Community. Prior to setting up CLEAR, Chani worked as an Associate
Director at Fulcrum Consulting where she led a strategic consultancy sector
specialising in energy, waste and water infrastructure solutions. Roles on
many industry forums have included Elected Member of the Board and
Council of CIBSE and Director of Sponge, a network of built environment
professionals. Chani has lectured on behalf of CABE (Commission for
Architecture and the Built Environment) and the RTPI (Royal Town Planning
Institute). Chani has also co-authored international conference papers
on zero carbon policy and integration of sustainable infrastructure at a
masterplanning level. Chani graduated in Civil Engineering and Architecture.
Dr Andry Widyowijatnoko
Architect, ITB
Dr Andry Widyowijatnoko is is an Architect by professional background, a
lecturer and researcher at the Building Technology Research Group School
of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, ITB, Indonesia. He
obtained his Doctor of Engineering and Chair of Structures and Structural
Design at the Faculty of Architecture in RWTH -Aachen, Germany with his
dissertation title: Traditional and Innovative Joints in Bamboo Construction”
in 2012. He obtained his Master of Architecture (MT) (with the thesis
title on Study on Plastered Bamboo Construction and the development
concepts) and Bachelor of Architecture (ST) (with final project title: Krakatau
Monitoring Facilities: Earthquake Resistant architecture) at the Department
of Architecture ITB in 1999 and 1995 respectively.
Dr Andry Widyowijatnoko delivers numerous guest lecturing on his expertise
regarding bamboo architecture to leading universities nationally and
internationally. He is a member of the Indonesian Union of Architect (IAI),
International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR) Construction Task
Force 3 and International Advisory Board Pacific Bamboo Resources (PBR).
11 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE
Dr Budi Faisal
Landscape Architect, ITB
Dr Budi Faisal completed his doctoral degree in Urban Planning at University
of Melbourne and double degree of Master of Urban Design and Master of
Architecture Landscape at University of Colorado. Dr Faisal has an extensive
portfolio in urban and landscape planning since 1992 and over the time
also growing interest in tourism planning, having developing several urban
and landscape designs in tourism context. Following several years of close
partnership with Center for Tourism Planning and Development, he was
appointed as the Chairman in 2012. As the leader of the organisation, he
supervise 15 employees and encourages broader contribution for many
strategic tourism development programs both in regional and national
level. He also gives expert assistance for local and central government,
mainly in the field of sustainable development, tourism governance and
management, and halal tourism.Dr Budi Faisal is part of the acceleration
team directly assisting the Minister of Tourism in developing Indonesia’s top
priority destinations and member of the Ministry’s DMO Program that
covers a total of 27 destinations in Indonesia.
Muhamad Ari Perdana
Sustainable Tourism, ITB
Ari is a Researcher from the Centre for Tourism Planning and Development,
Institute of Technology Bandung (P-P2Par ITB). He obtained his Master
Degree (S2) from ITB majoring at Tourism Planning, School of Architecture,
Planning and Policy Development in 2016 and received his undergraduate
bachelor degree (S1 Degree) at Bandung Institute of Tourism (Sekolah
Tinggi Pariwisata Bandung), majoring at Study of Travel Industry (S1
Degree). Ari is the member of expert team for various government bodies
including Authority for Tourism and Culture of West Java Province, Ministry
of Tourism of Indnoesia And United Nations World Tourism Organization
(UNWTO), Ministry of Tourism of Indonesia and Bandung Institute of Tourism
Travel Department Study of Travel Industry Programme.
Dr Benno Rahardyan Jennifer Hardi BSc (Hons)
Environmental Engineer, ITB PGCHE, MPhil, MCIAT, MCIOB, SFHEA
Architectural Technologist, LSBU
Dr Benno Rahardyan is an Assistant Professor at Environmental Engineering
department within the Faculty of Civil & Environmental Engineering at
Jennifer Hardi joined London South Bank University in September 2013
ITB since 1996, specialising in solid waste management and 20 years of
as Senior Lecturer in Architectural Technology and a Course Director for
experience in the particular topic. He is the Head of Bachelor Environmental
BSc (Hons) Architectural Technology and Architectural Engineering. She is
Engineering Programme and completed his Doctoral Engineering degree
a chartered member of Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologist
in Environmental Resource Engineering from Hokkaido University, Japan in
(MCIAT), Construction Manager member for Chartered Institute of Builders
2004. Prior to that, Benno obtained his Master in Engineering in year 2000
(MCIOB) and a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA).
and his Bachelor of Engineering in 1996 both in Environmental Engineering
Jennifer’s research interest is in architecture design technology, Building
area at ITB.
Information Modelling, sustainability, environmental assessment method,
Dr Benno Rahardyan has been awarded Satya Lancana Karya Satya, from
BIM, LCA, and energy efficiency in buildings. She was awarded a Merit
President of Republik of Indonesia and active as part of the expert panel
Award for the CIOB International Innovation and Research Awards 2015 in
for the Indonesian Society of Sanitary and Environmental Engineers, Design
the Innovation in Education and Training Award category in January 2016
of Landfills and Integrated Solid Waste Management (POKJA AMPLWaste)
and heavily involved in various sustainability expert panels and in peer
Management Task Force and Indonesia Solid Waste Association (InSWA)
reviewing various international journals specialising in sustainability.
in West Java, Indonesia. He has also published numerous peer reviewed
journal articles and presenting at international conference relating to solid
waste management.  
 

Basransyah Dr Issa Chaer

Environmental Engineer, ITB Building Services Engineer, LSBU

Dr Benno Rahardyan is an Assistant Professor at Environmental Engineering Issa is a Chartered Engineer with a BEng (Hons) degree in Mechanical
department within the Faculty of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Engineering and a PhD in Heat Transfer. He is an active research academic
ITB since 1996, specialising in solid waste management and 20 years of with interests in energy conversion and energy management including
experience in the particular topic. He is the Head of Bachelor Environmental Pyrolysis, Combined Heat and Power (CHP) and trigeneration systems,
Engineering Programme and completed his Doctoral Engineering degree refrigeration, alternative and renewable technologies, life cycle assessment,
in Environmental Resource Engineering from Hokkaido University, Japan in heat transfer, and novel techniques to reduce energy demand and carbon
2004. Prior to that, Benno obtained his Master in Engineering in year 2000 emission within the engineering sector.
and his Bachelor of Engineering in 1996 both in Environmental Engineering
area at ITB.
Dr Benno Rahardyan has been awarded Satya Lancana Karya Satya, from
President of Republik of Indonesia and active as part of the expert panel
for the Indonesian Society of Sanitary and Environmental Engineers, Design
of Landfills and Integrated Solid Waste Management (POKJA AMPLWaste)
Management Task Force and Indonesia Solid Waste Association (InSWA)
in West Java, Indonesia. He has also published numerous peer reviewed
journal articles and presenting at international conference relating to solid
waste management.

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 12

Prof Andy Ford Sean Nino
Building Services Engineer, LSBU Sustainable Engineering and Design Consultants, Mantra

Andy is a Professor of Building Systems Engineering and Director of the Sean Nino is a sustainability economist that focuses on building and
Centre for Efficient and Renewable Energy in Buildings (CEREB). In 1983 developing projects and systems approaches, in line with Indonesia’s
Andy establish his own consulting practice ‘Fulcrum Consulting’ which Nationally Determined Climate contributions. He is passionate about
became famed for advanced integrated low energy building design and material/waste management and believes that the sector needs a complete
sustainable master planning. overhaul and new forms of innovation. Young leaders are needed to tackle
the huge problem that waste management is.
Andy’s involvement with the future direction of the industry has grown
over the years. Fulcrum proactively lead the industry debate around
sustainability and were founding members of the UKGBC. Andy was the
Technical and Policy Chair for the first 3 years of operation and remains
a UK Green Building council Ambassador. He has had a long interest
in research, innovation and knowledge transfer working as a research
manager in DTI Partners in Innovation program and serving on the Modern
Built Environment Knowledge Transfer Network steering group since its
foundation. He was awarded the IMechE Built Environment Prize in 2008
and an honorary doctorate by Herriot Watt University in 2012. 

Tilly Ford Ajay Shah

Atelier Ten, Environmental Design Consultant Atelier Ten, Environmental Design Consultant

Tilly is an Environmental Designer at Atelier Ten based out of San Francisco, Ajay Shah is a Principle Environmental Designer at Atelier Ten based in
California. Atelier Ten are an international building services engineers London, Ajay has successfully led sustainability and environmental design
and environmental design consultants committed to high-performance teams on a range of projects. His current research focuses on the holistic
and sustainable design within the built environment. Tilly started her integration of sustainability principles from initial architectural concepts
career graduating with a masters degree in Architectural Engineering through to construction and implementation.
from the University of Leeds. Tilly worked as an Mechanical Engineer at
 
Atelier Ten in London for 4 years before relocating to San Francisco to
become Environmental Design Consultant. Tilly’s experience includes high
performance buildings and the implementation of sustainable principles
into design with particular interest in passive design, thermal comfort and
daylight.

13 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

Brian Mark
Technical Expert, Clear Community
Brian has been a commercial consulting engineer for 40 years, specialising
in the design and development of sustainable systems for the built
environment. He was a founding partner of Fulcrum Consulting, an
international engineering consultancy which became a key commentator on
the development of UK sustainable construction policy. Brian is a specialist
in the engineering of zero carbon, zero waste infrastructure to serve future
sustainable cities. He advised the UK government on development of a
national renewable energy policy over several years as a Member of the
UK Renewables Advisory Board. Brian presently lives off-grid in west Wales
and is involved in local community development and community energy
schemes.
Rendy Aditya Wachid
Architect, Parongpong
Rendy Aditya Wachid is an Indonesian Architect, Project Manager
& Entrepreneur. Rendy specialized in start up business and project
management focusing on designs and creative industries. He has 8 years
experience supervising and managing projects for government and private
sector in South East Asia, and China.
He is mostly known as the founder of Galeri Gerilya, and co-founder of Riset
Indie Indonesia. From 2008 to 2010 while taking his master degree, he
worked voluntarily for Studio Habitat under Habitat for Humanity Indonesia
as Project Coordinator, managing and coordinating design and build of cost
effective houses for low-income family in Jakarta and Bandung, Indonesia.
He is a member of modern asian architecture network (mAAN) since 2007,
he assist workshop and seminar for the organization activities in Indonesia
and later held the Muntok Tin Mining CIty Workshop in 2011 as head
workshop coordinator.
Since 2016 Rendy returned to his hometown in bandung Indonesia,
teaching business class for young designers at a private university, founded
his waste management company , and actively investing on zero waste
based start ups. On the weekend he’s a full time organic farmer and
woodworker in Parongpong, West Java, Indonesia.
COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 14
Submission
Requirements
The competition submission should focus on
how the project addresses the key project aims
through a comprehensive design report with
supporting drawings and graphics illustrating the
design solution. Records of team meetings plus
any supporting data and calculations should also
be part of the submission. The design will be
presented in a group presentation, to be videoed
and submitted with the concept design package.
• Architectural Design Narrative [500-1000
words]
• Sustainability Narrative [500-1500 words]
• Engineering Narrative [500-1500 words]
• Tourism & Community Education Narrative
[500-1500 words]
• Social Enterprise Narrative [500-1000 words]
• Documentation of International Team meetings
[Appended Meeting Minutes]

Meeting Minutes - email communication should be

PRESENTATION held weekly and online meetings should be held
fornightly from mid Jan to mid March.
All teams will be required to submit a single video
recording of their team presentation, utilising
Note: Mentors will be available fortnightly
presentation tools of their choosing, such as
for meetings or conference calls during the
powerpoint or other creative techniques. The
competition period, but scheduling options may
presentation video should be no longer than
be limited due to diary commitments and time
30 minutes in total and summarise the team
differences.
response to the design brief covering the key topic
sections of the design report.
Teams are welcomed to use their expertise to
enhance the designs, this can include but is not
Each participant is expected to give their own
limited to engineering and environmental analysis
personal presentation within the team video,
and calculations, cost reviews, business plans
focusing on their specialist discipline and the
etc. Any additional information submitted will be
areas in which they have contributed to the overall
considered under the criteria section ‘Evolutions
team submission. If a participant extends the
and Innovations’. The design report is required to
content of their input and presentation beyond
be submitted electronically in an A4 format.
their specialist discipline that is also welcomed
and will be considered of equal merit by the
review panel. Students may record sections GRAPHICS/DRAWINGS
independently, compiling into a single file for final
submission. The design solution should be illustrated using
graphic representation, including BIM design, to
present a holistic presentation of the concept
DESIGN REPORT design. This should include as a minimum:
The scheme concept design report should provide
• Site & Masterplan to scale
a comprehensive overview of the concept design
• Floor Plans to scale
demonstrating how the team has addressed the
• Elevation and Section to scale
project brief, incorporating the project goals and
• 3D & Concept visualisations
technical requirements. The design report should
• Schematics/Diagrams for metabolic systems
include the following sections of words of narrative
(e.g. Ventilation, Daylight, Water, Waste, Energy
and relevant pictures/diagrams and relevant
systems)
appendicies.
• Engineering Drawings (as applicable
depending on team disciplines)

15 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

Drawings and Graphics are required to be
submitted electronically in A3 format. Hard copy
printouts are welcomed but not required, however
participants may choose to use printed copies as
a medium within their presentation videos. Please
also submit the electronic copy of the CAD design
file (in revit, autocad and/or other relevant CAD
softwares).

SUBMISSION
Teams should upload submissions to their
allocated team google drive folder and email
Jennifer Hardi (Hardij@lsbu.ac.uk) to confirm they
have completed the upload by 23.59 (WIB) on
Friday 15th March 2019.

Ensure all file names are clearly titled including

team name.

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 16

Design Criteria
DESIGN BRIEF
Teams will be required to develop a concept
design solution on one of two sites. The sites will
be allocated to the teams during the workshops in
Bandung at the beginning of January 2019.
The competition submission should demonstrate
how the following core principles have been
addressed:
1. Engineering Design and Innovation (including
consideration of pyrolysis technology)
2. Local and Sustainable Design (including
consideration of Bamboo, natural and recycled
materials)
3. Resilience and Adaptability (including
consideration of climate-proofing)
4. Community Education and Sustainable
Tourism
5. Economic Viability and Social Enterprise
Teams will be allocated one of the following sites:
• Project Area A: Desa Material Hub serving
Margacinta - Location: Margacinta
• Project Area B: Kabupaten Material Hub
serving Pangandaran - Location: Bojong
Salawe
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
It should be demonstrated that following technical
requirements have been incorporated into the final
scheme design proposals. Within a combination of
written narratives and design drawings students
should demonstrate how all aspects have been
considered and addressed through design.
Climate and Environmental Influences
The climate of West Java is tropical, with each
experiencing site specific micro climates. Students
will be required to show how climate adaptiveness
and resilience has been incorporated into design.
Projects should not only be designed for the
17 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE
current climate but demonstrate climate change
readiness. Teams should consider the following
climate and environmental influences:
• Temperature
• Precipitation
• Wind
• Solar exposure
• Odour management
• Noise
• Topography
• Biodiversity
• Resiliency: Natural Disaster and Climate
Change
Site & Architecture
The Architectural design should present a new
standard in community waste management.
Project teams will need to develop designs which
are architecturally interesting but affordable and
maintainable for typical rural Indonesia locations,
with particular focus on coastal areas. There
should be a consideration for locally available
building materials and techniques, incorporating
materials such as bamboo. All designs should
include an element of outward facing community
education and eco-tourism, to educate both locals
and visitors.
• Community Education and Sustainable
Tourism
• Locally available materials (example: Bamboo)
• Low cost and maintainable
• Access and Transportation
• Use of local recycled and upcycled materials
such as aggregate and bricks
Ancillary Accommodation:
The following ancillary accommodation must be
provided within the design:
• An office space for management and
administration
• A space for meetings/workshops/tours/
exhibitions
• A WC for use by staff and visitors
• A retail space for sale of eco-products,
including local crafts from re-purposed
materials, compost and community garden
produce
• A community garden area or a concept for a
linked community garden offsite
Material Sorting and Management
Teams should demonstrate how the material hub
is able achieve a 90% diversion from landfill or
mismanaged disposal.
All teams will be addressing one of two scales
of facility, each facility will be designed to sort
and process a designated amount of waste for
the community they are serving. Teams should
refer to the online appendix for project specific
data including population data, waste generation
data and waste engineering equipment and size
guidance.
A given waste flow scenario is to be assumed for
the design, which is described by the diagram and
supporting notes entitled ‘CLEARIN Material Loop’
in the appendices to this design brief. This waste
flow scenario is part of the waste management
framework model that was output from the first
year IAPP.
A vital component of a successful waste
management process is sorting waste at source.
Students should think about how the community
can be educated and informed about waste
sorting.
Teams should review and consider space
allocation and sizing for the following:
Material Delivery
• Truck Access
• Docking and Loading/Unloading
• Easily cleanable areas
Sorting & Weighing for processing and resale
(Recycling/Non-Recycling/Organic)
• Glass
• Metal
• Plastic (by plastic type)
• Organic Waste
• Paper
• Landfill
Processing Systems
options include:
• Pyrolysis for fuel production
• Compost for resale
• Biodigestion for biogas production
• Shredding and Compacting for storage and
resale
Storage and Sale of materials
Options include:
Up-cycling:
• Building Materials
• Aggregate (e.g. Glass used as a concrete)
• Eco-bricks (Plastic)
• Compacted Bricks (Plastic, cement and glass
made into bricks for construction)
Products:
• Pyrolysis - Fuel
• Composting - Liquid Fertilizer
• Biodigesting - Biogas & Liquid Fertilizer
• Solid Fuel
Please note the following requirements should be
observed for material handling:
• Organics need to be processed on same day
as they are picked up. Food waste can be
digested by itself or composted and mixed with
garden waste.
• Non Organic materials can be stored
indefinitely and do not produce any smell
if they are clean of organic materials that
decompose and produce foul smells.
• B3 - Hazardous waste should be treated
separately and within an area that has
a sealed concrete floor that ensures no
COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 18
 hazardous material leaches into the ground.
(Batteries, lightbulbs, E- Waste, Other
Chemicals)
Sustainability
Sustainable and resilient design should be at the
core the design solution. Teams will be expected
to think about all areas of sustainable design,
including passive and adaptive design strategies
to energy, water and sustainable community
integration. Benchmarking frameworks, such
as LEED, are recommended to be used as
guiding principles, students will be expected to
demonstrate how the following sustainability
principles have been addressed
• Climate Resilient Design
• Water Savings Strategies
• Low Energy and Passive Design Strategies
• Renewable energy opportunities
• Carbon impact
• Daylight and Solar Design
• Benchmarking (LEED & GBCI Greenship)
• Bioclimatic Design
Education & Sustainable Tourism
A significant part of the challenge is local
education to the community and tourist. The
Material Hub should be a desirable, inspiring
location and be able to function as a tourist
destination and educational facility so that it not
only environmentally supports the communities
and region but also helps to provide an
economically sustainable strategy supporting the
long term ambitions of the project.
Competition teams are asked to address the
following question in their submissions:
• How can the tourism industry partner with
local decision makers to enforce and help
regulate separation of waste/materials at
source?
• What might be the the role of the Kepala
Dusun / Kepala Desa / Bupati (Leader of
Hamlet / leader of Village / Leader of Regency)
in ensuring waste minimisation and separation
is achieved?
• Are there any waste education activities
19 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE
in particular (as a tour activities/tourism
packages/tourism products) that your team
can suggest to take place at the Material Hub?
• Are there any Visitor Management Plan that
your team can suggest at the Material Hub?
• Are there any Tourism Information Plan (tour
guide, interpretation board, guide book,
brochure, etc.) that your team can suggest at
the Material Hub?
• Are there any Community Involvement Plan
(local community’s role, level of involvement,
involvement process, etc.) that your team can
suggest to the local community in the area of
Material Hub?
• Are there any Community Capacity
Development Plan (Training and Education)
related to the Sustainable Tourism and Waste
Management that your team can suggest to
the local community in the area of Material
Hub?
• What role does socio-economic hierarchy play
in determining the success of a community
waste management facility such as this?
• What type of agreements need to be achieved
for waste/material management to function
on a community level and how are they
maintained and improved over time?
Social Enterprise and Business Model
Teams should include a description of how the
Material Hub facility could be operated as an
economically viable social enterprise should
be included within the submission. A variety of
enterprise activities may be part of the business
model for the facility and associated operations.
Qualitative descriptions will be considered
sufficient for the competition submission, however
if quantitative analysis can be provided to support
the enterprise concepts, this will reflect favourably
on the appraisal of the team’s scheme.
Evolutions and Innovations
Teams are invited to submit their own suggestions
for evolutions and innovations beyond those
identified in this design brief, where they feel
there is value added by doing so. These evolutions
can be where a team might wish to go over and
above the required level of detail for information
submitted, or where they may wish to proposed
a new angle or measure to the project concept.
The panel will include consideration of ‘evolutions
and innovations’ in their appraisal of submitted
schemes.
 
Assessment Criteria
Submissions will be assessed using the below
criteria for assessment, with a total of 100 marks
available.
1. Is the design likely to inspire the public to feel
good about waste material management? [10
marks]
2. Does the design meet the technical
requirements for waste material management in
an optimised way? [10 marks]
3. Does the design response demonstrate best
practice in environmental sustainability? [10
marks]
4. Has the design incorporated local and
vernacular architecture and materials? [10 marks]
5. Is the design response sensitive to local
climatic conditions? [10 marks]
6. Have the team demonstrated ingenuity with
respect to economic viability and opportunities for
social enterprise? [10 marks]
7. Does the submission show novel approaches
to incorporating community education and
sustainable tourism? [10 marks]
8. Do any evolutions or innovations offer added
value to the scheme? [10 marks]
9. Has BIM working methodology been practiced
during the design process? [10 marks]
10. Has attendance and collaborative working
been well demonstrated by all team members?
[10 marks]
COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 20
Resources
Students are encouraged to research the various
measures included in the design brief as well
as using precedent studies. Teams may have a
variety of skill sets, you may use whatever tools
and resources are available to you.

Students will have access to the project Google

Drive which will include useful supplementary
information. Teams are encouraged to ask for any
futher information required.

Shared Online Resources:

1) Site Data
a. Aerial images to scale
b. Site Plan to scale
2) Architectural Resources
a. Bamboo design guidelines
b. Precedent Studies
3) Sustainability Resources
a. LEED Scorecard sample
4) Technical Resources
a. Waste Management Data
b. Pyrolosis Equipment information
c. Biodigester technology example
d. Composter technology example

Technical Expertise:
• Online expert Q&A
• Mentoring sessions

21 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

Glossary
Barang Bekas
Barang Bekas is a term used for recycling but
also encompasses all second hand goods. Places
where second hand goods are traded are also
referred to as ‘barang bekas’ or ‘tempat barang
bekas’ (second hand place).
Kecamatan [subdistrict]:
A kecamatan [subdistrict] is a subdivision
of regencies (kabupaten) and cities (kota). A
kecamatan is itself divided into administrative
villages (kelurahan or desa).
Desa [village]:
Depending on the principles they are
administered, villages in Indonesia can be
called desa or keluharan. A “desa” (a term that
derives from a Sanskrit word meaning “country],
is administered according to traditions and
customary law (adat), while a kelurahan is
administered along more “modern” principles.
desa are generally located in rural areas while
kelurahan are generally urban subdivisions.
A desa or kelurahan is the subdivision of a
kecamatan (subdistrict), in turn the subdivision of
a kabupaten(district) or kota (city). As a general
rule, desa and kelurahan are groupings of hamlets
(dusun in Java, banjar in Bali). A desa is headed
by a ’kepala desa’, who is elected by popular vote.
A kelurahan is headed by ’urah’, a civil servant
appointed by local government. The desa is the
lowest level of government administration in
Indonesia. A desa can be divided into several
hamlets (dusun) and community groups (RW),
which are further divided into neighbourhood
groups (RT).
Dusun [hamlet]:
Dusun (also known as dukuh) is the distribution
of administrative territories in Indonesia below
the Desa or Kelurahan, which is translated into
English as ‘hamlet’. The person who leads the
dusun is called the ‘kepala dusun’. A dusun is
a group of settlements that are close together,
formed of several community neighbourhood units
(RW and RT). In general, villages (desa) in Java are
a groups of dusun that are separated by rivers,
rice fields, fields, gardens or forests.
Kabupaten [regency]:
This is the list of regencies and cities of
Indonesia. Both regencies and cities are second-
level administrative subdivision in Indonesia,
immediately below the provinces, and above the
districts. In Indonesia, both regency and city are
at the same administration level, each having
their own local government and legislative body.
The difference between a regency and a city lies
in demography, size, and economy. Generally, a
regency comprises a rural area larger than a city,
but also often includes various towns. A regency
(Indonesian: kabupaten) is headed by a regent,
known locally as bupati, while a city (Indonesian:
kota) is headed by a mayor (walikota). Each
regency or city is divided further into districts
known as ‘kecamatan’, or ‘distrik’ in Papua.
Orang Rongsok [material trader]:
Orang Rongsok is a local term used in parts
of Indonesia to describe a material trader who
will buy used items and materials which have a
recyclable value. The literal translation of the term
to English would be ‘Rubbish Person’.
RT – [rukun tetangga]:
A rukun tetangga (RT) consists of a number of
houses or households (family heads). An RT is a
community organization that is recognized and
fostered by the government preserve the values
of life of the Indonesian people based on mutual
cooperation and kinship and to help improve the
smooth functioning of government, development
and society in villages. Each RT consists of as
many as 30 families for the village and as many
as 50 families for the village formed. rukun
tetangga is the lowest administrative division
of Indonesia, usually under the rukun warga
(RW). RT’s are not included in the division of
government administration, and their formation
is through the deliberation of the local community
in the framework of community services set by
the Village or keluharan. The Neighborhood Unit
is headed by the Chairperson of the RT who is
chosen by his citizens.
COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 22
RW [rukun warga]:
Rukun warga (RW) is the division of regions in
Indonesia under the Village (desa) or keluharan
(or under: dusun or sub-village). RW is a
Community Institution formed through RT (rukun
tetangga) management meetings in its working
area in the context of government and community
services that are recognized and fostered by
the Regional Government. RW not including the
division of administration, and the formation
of local communities is through consultation in
the framework of community service set by the
village or villages. RW is further divided into Rukun
Tetangga (RT).
Sustainable Tourism:
Tourism that takes full account of its current
and future economic, social and environmental
impacts, addressing the needs of visitors, the
industry, the environment and host communities.
TPS (Tempat Penampungan Sementara):
TPS is the temporary container/shelter for waste
materials, most commonly taking the form of a
skip in a dedicated location. The TPS is the place
before the garbage is transported to the recycling,
management, and / or place of integrated waste
management (according to Law 18/2008).
TPST (Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Terpadu):
TPST is an integrated waste management site
where the collection, sorting, reuse, recycling, and
final processing of waste is carried out (according
to Law No. 18 of 2008). This equivalent to the
‘Material Hub’ as described in this design brief.
TPA (Tempat Pemrosesan Akhir):
TPA is the final processing site for waste, a place
to process and return garbage to environmental
media safely for humans and the environment
(according to Law 18/2008). The TPA typically
takes the form of a landfill site or what in English
is commonly described as a ‘tip’ or ‘dump’.
Pyrolysis:
Plastic Pyrolysis is a thermal process involving
the use of heat at temperatures ranging between
370oC and 550oC and in the absence of Oxygen
23 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE
to depolymerised and breakdown the carbon-
based organic materials in plastic into other useful
hydrocarbon products. Thus Pyrolysis is a great
and proven way of recycling plastic waste into
useful energy and alternative forms.
The process operate at and is most efficient when
the input waste has been pre-sorted to provide a
homogeneous and carbon-rich input stream. The
process has also been proved to be most effective
when applied to single waste streams e.g. Plastics,
Tyres and Agricultural wastes. The pyrolysis oil can
be used to supplement the heat for the actual
Pyrolysis process and to also drive machineries
or even to produce electricity. Solid slag is also
produced from the process, which may, under
further processing, process charcoal blocks. In
general, pyrolysis plants are on a large scale
and designed for continuous processing, with a
capacity of typically 20,000 to 100,000 tonnes
per annum. But batch systems are available on
the market with capacities as low as 1 kg per
batch.
Robinson et al (2010) define two main types of
pyrolysis process, namely:
(i) fast (or flash) pyrolysis - which involves high
heating rates and rapid quenching, that produces
high yields of bio-oil
(ii) slow pyrolysis – which involves longer
residence times leading to further thermal
decomposition of the initial liquid pyrolysis
products, resulting in a high biogas yield
both types of process are currently provided by
different manufacturers around the world with
claimed efficiencies of upto 80 %.
Overall technology, the benefits of using Pyrolysis
to manage plastic waste provide both economic,
environmental and resource benefits including;
• Elimination of the hazard of land and sea
pollution by plastic waste
• Converting waste into usable fuel and energy
- The end products can be used as fuel in
existing industrial boilers and furnaces or used
for .generation of electricity.
• providing job opportunities through collection,
sorting and processing
[blank]

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 24

Appendix A
CLEARIN MATERIAL LOOP

For the purposes of the Material Hub design competition a given waste flow scenario needs to be
assumed. Given that most people do not have in depth knowledge of waste management and half of
the competition team members are also unfamiliar with Indonesian life, it is important that a picture of
the waste management scenario is painted as part of the project briefing process.

A single view of the whole material flow for a community is quite rare as there are many complex
relationships. However, it is useful to see the overall situation and how everything fits together. The
CLEARIN Material Loop (see diagram) captures the whole material flow in one diagram, highlighting the
key attributes.

This Material Loop represents a viable, exemplary scenario that can be achieved for any community
applying The CLEARIN Framework and is the scenario which design submissions should be based
around. This scenario deliberately allows flexibility and minimises prescriptive detail in order to be
applicable to a wide variety of communities.

25 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

Start at zero (0) on the Material Loop diagram and follow the circuit clockwise through the 4 stages of
material handling and back to the start again. Once you have completed the loop it should be apparent
how, with proper separation and handling, the majority of a community’s material resources can be re-
used, re-purposed or recycled, so that only a small fraction are disposed of.

In fact when applying this Material Loop, it is projected that every village or community could reduce
the amount of municipal waste to landfill (or mismanaged disposal) by 90% using readily available and
affordable technologies.

As new technologies and systems are developed and lifestyle habits evolve it may be possible for a
community to take the final 10% of disposed material down to zero. Annual updates of community
waste management plans can incorporate new technologies and innovations as they evolve, hence the
communities can be working towards ‘zero-waste’ as a long-term vision.

0. Incoming Sources of Materials and Litter

Start at zero (0) on the Material Loop where you can see the incoming sources of materials entering the
waste stream. Tourism, river and sea are external sources, whereas the local community is an internal
source. Source materials are often mixed during use, hence the mixed colour background on this
section of the loop.

1. Material Separation
Waste Materials should be separated at source. This is the single most important measure to enable
a successful and sustainable waste management system. Separation at source by local community
members reduces the operational costs, which can otherwise be too great so that systems fail.

The color coding for separation of waste adheres to the standard most commonly applied in Java:
green, yellow and red whereby green applies to organic or ‘green’ materials, yellow applies to general
dry materials which cannot be composted and red applies to materials that are considered hazardous
or toxic, including the classification known as ‘B3’ waste.

Bins throughout the area need to be set up using the same red, yellow, green colour coding, with
pictures, notes and training to help guide people when using them.

One of the best measures already in place in Indonesia to encourage the community to separate waste
at source is a community ‘waste bank’. This concept gives people a financial and social incentive to
separate their waste and bring it to a community ‘waste bank’ station.

Waste Banks can be set up for each RT (neighbourhood) or RW (group of neighbourhoods) or dusun
(hamlet), with a couple of hours twice a week when people can bring their waste to be ‘banked’. The
most local RT level may be the most successful for some villages as it is the most socially intimate and
people will feel more engaged the more local it is.

At a waste bank people receive a credit for every gram of recyclable waste material, which is ‘banked’
and can ultimately be exchanged for money of other benefits as agreed by the community. The waste
banks then sell the separated materials to local material traders.

There are many other ways to ensure separation of waste at source, including education measures,
good signage, and fines/laws.

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 26

2. Collections from Neighbourhoods and Kerbsides
After waste materials have been separated at source they are collected on a regular basis from around
the community.

There are a variety of ways that collection regimes can be organized. Usually collections should be once
or twice a week to keep neighbourhoods clean and tidy. For kerbside bins collections may need to be
more frequent especially when there are busy tourist areas and peak holiday times.

As a minimum, there should be a Material Collection Point for each RT, which can be part of the Bank
Sampah.

There should also be collections from kerbside bins.

If there is sufficient budget and access to reach every household in a community, house-to-house
collections of separated waste can be made. If there is poor access or insufficient budget to reach every
home the community can bring waste to their RT collection point at a designated day/time each week.
Some communities may opt to have a number of collection points for each RT to which families take
their waste, for example one material collection point for every five homes or businesses. In this case
it is very important to assign responsibility for keeping the collection points clean and well-managed to
avoid them becoming an eyesore and unhealthy.

Once it is collected, the separated waste from all the Material Collection Points is taken to the local
Material Hub which is the heart of the community’s operation.

At the Material Hub, refinement of the waste sorting takes place. Materials are stored temporarily
before being sold, re-purposed, re-cycled, treated or sent to another waste facility (for example a
Kabupaten level TPS).

In order to maximize the amount of waste re-used or recycled and minimize the amount sent to a TPS,
there are a number of initiatives and activities which should take place at the Material Hub, including:

• Collection of materials for local enterprise and crafts, such as coffee packets for upcycling into bags
• Treatment of materials, for example composting and anaerobic digestion of green waste or pyrolysis
of plastic
• Temporary storage of saleable, separated recyclables
• A community garden in which fruit and vegetable produce is grown using composted material
• A community shop where a variety of products made from the waste materials can be sold. This can
include craft products, produce from community gardens, compost and oil. It can also include things
which help to reduce waste, such stainless steel drinking straws and waters bottles. The shop could
be aimed towards both tourists and locals and educational eco-tours could also be arranged there.
• Temporary storage of non-useable dry materials and B3 waste

3. Re-purposing of materials
Once separated, collected and sorted, the materials can be re-purposed.
Re-purposing includes:

• Use of compost for growing fruit and vegetables in homes and community gardens
• Use of biogas for cooking at community event (if an anaerobic digester is installed)
• Bank Sampah credit traded for compost/fertilizer/biogas/oil/ char to local people

27 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

• Sale of compost/fertilizer/biogas/oil/ char to people/companies outside of the community
• Upcycling of materials into useable or saleable products
• Sale of recyclable materials to material traders

Once all possible materials have been re-purposed, the residual materials for which no re-use or
recycling option is available are then transported to a TPS. Typically the TPS will be a Kabupaten level
(regional level) facility.

In a best practice scenario this residual material sent to the TPS will be no more than 10% of the
original material flowing into the community.

4. Value yielded to benefit local community

The local community will benefit in many ways from the re-purposing of materials as described within
the CLEARIN Material Loop.

There will be economic, social and environmental benefits.

Social benefits will include healthier people, more beautiful scenery, positive collaboration, happiness
from a sense of responsibility and achievement.

Environmental benefits will include reduced local pollution to air, water and land, reduced health risk to
wildlife and cleaner natural areas.

Economic benefits will include increase in income from tourism, increase in interest of businesses to
locate in the area, increase in land value. Furthermore, financial value can be directly yielded by the
local community via revenue and saving from agricultural produce, fertilizer, biogas, oil, craft products
and material trading.

If the CLEARIN Material Loop is applied fully in a community there is great potential for that location to
achieve a substantial increase in prosperity, wellbeing and sustainability.

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 28

 Appendix B
WASTE GENERATION AND COMPOSITION DATA

General Composition of Waste

Composition (%) Type of waste Composition (%) 2.53

3.62
0.63 Composition of Waste (%) 3.62
2.53 0.63
51.82Kitchen Waste 51.82 2.17 2.17
0.65 0.65
6.06Leaves/Garden 6.06 0.08 0.08
1.22
16.91Plastic 16.91 14.37 1.22
14.37 51.82
Paper 14.37 16.91
1.22Metal 1.22
0.08Rubber/leather 6.06
0.08
0.65Textile 0.65
2.17Glass 2.17
2.53 Kitchen Waste Leaves/Garden Plastic Paper
Nappies 2.53 Kitchen Waste
0.63 Metal Rubber/leather Textile Glass
Hazardous 0.63 Metal
3.62 Nappies Hazardous Others
Others 3.62 Nappies

Details Composition of Waste

Jenis Komposisi (%) Information

Komposisi Jenis Komposisi (%) Information
Bone, meat, fish 1.095
Bone, meat, fish 1.095
Fruits 18.065 can be recycled
Fruits 18.065 can be recycled
Vegetables 7.75 can be recycled
Kitchen Waste Vegetables 7.75 can be recycled
Leftovers 24.91 can be recycled
Etc 0 Leftovers 24.91 can be recycled
Flower leaf 5.12 Etc
can be recycled 0
Grumble 0.695 Flower leaf 5.12 can be recycled
Wood Leaves/Parks 0.245 Grumble 0.695
PET (Plastic Bottle) 2.485 Wood
can be recycled 0.245
Plastic bags 3.12 PET (Plastic Bottle) 2.485 can be recycled
Emberan Plastic bags
0 can be recycled 3.12
PP Cup 1.865 Emberan
can be recycled 0 can be recycled
PE (Clear Kilo Plastic) 3.96 PP
can Cup
be recycled 1.865 can be recycled
Plastic
Styrofoam 0.61 PE (Clear Kilo Plastic) 3.96 can be recycled
Plastic Packaging 1.885 Styrofoam 0.61
Etc 2.985 Plastic Packaging 1.885
Newspaper 0.47 Etc
can be recycled 2.985
Packaging (Tetrapak) 1.79 Newspaper 0.47 can be recycled
Cardboard, carton 2.335 Packaging (Tetrapak)
can be recycled 1.79
Tissue Paper 4.925 Cardboard, carton 2.335 can be recycled
Paper 4.845 Tissue
can be recycled 4.925
ron can be recycled
0 Paper 4.845 can be recycled
Iron 0 can be recycled
Aluminum 0.015 can be recycled
Brass 0 can be recycled
Metal
Copper 0.03 can be recycled
Cans 1.17 can be recycled
Zinc 0 can be recycled
Rubber 0.08
Rubber/leather
Skin 0
Natural ingredient 0.57
Textile
Artificial Materials 0.075
Glass 0.185 can be recycled
Glass
Bottle 1.98 can be recycled
Nappies Diaper 2.525
Electronic Waste 0.13
Medical 0
Hazardous (B3)
Dangerous 0.01
Toiletries and Cleaners 0.49
Others Cigarette butts, stones, sand, etc 3.62
TOTAL 100

DATA IS AN EXTRACT OF FULL DATA AVAILABLE IN EXCEL FORMAT ON THE SHARED ONLINE DRIVE. REFER TO FULL
DATA SET FOR DESIGN PURPOSES.

29 JAN 2019 | COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE

SITE A: DESA WASTE GENERATION SUMMARY

Waste Generation Total Waste Generation

Source of Waste Total
(kg/unit/day) ton/day ton/year mᶟ/day
Domestik Population (person) 3,218 0.7 2.2526 822.20 12.95
Restaurant (seat) 45 0.13 0.0059 2.14 0.03
Hotel (bed) 0 0.189 - - -
Home stay (bed) 0 0.371 - - -
Stall (seat) 0 0.11 - - -
Non Domestik Street (meter) 19400 0.025 0.4850 177.03 2.79
School (student) 225 0.05 0.0113 4.11 0.06
Office (employe) 11 0.1 0.0011 0.40 0.01
Traditional Market (m²) 0 0.3 - - -
Tourist (person/day) 6 0.497 0.0030 1.09 0.02
Total 2.7588 1,006.96 15.86

Note Data Source :

Restaurant (seat) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Hotel (bed) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Home stay (bed) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Stall (seat) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Street (meter) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran
School (student) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran
Office (employe) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran
Traditonal Market (m²) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran + Measurement
Tourist (person/day) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran

SITE B: KABUPATEN WASTE GENERATION SUMMARY

Summary " Amount of Waste Generation"

Total Waste Generation
Source of Waste
ton/day ton/year mᶟ/day mᶟ/year
Domestik Population 306.51 111,876.30 1761.55 642,966.38
Non-Domestik Restaurant 0.7336 267.764 4.22 1,538.87
Hotel 1.64 598.6 9.43 3,440.23
Home stay 0.0727 26.5355 0.42 152.50
Stall 0.35 127.75 2.01 734.20
Street 14.076 5137.74 80.90 29,527.24
School 4.5967 1677.7773 26.42 9,642.50
Office 0.7884 287.766 4.53 1,653.83
Traditonal Market 34.89 12736.61 200.52 73,188.79
Tourist (person/day) 3.35 1,222.13 19.25 7,027.30
Total 367.01 133,958.97 2,109.24 769,871.84

Note Data Source :

Restaurant (seat) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Hotel (bed) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Home stay (bed) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Stall (seat) : Tourism and Culture Services of Pangadaran
Street (meter) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran
School (student) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran
Office (employe) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran
Traditonal Market (m²) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran + Measurement
Tourist (person/day) : Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Pangadaran

COMPETITION DESIGN GUIDE | JAN 2019 30