Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
1. For tariff purposes, wheat shall be classified as follows: 3.1 The shipment may qualify for Tentative Release
1.1 Under HS 1001.9090 (Food Grade) when all the following upon payment of the taxes and duties as per declaration
elements are present: and the posting of cash bond to cover the tariff differential.
1.1.1 the importer/consignee of the imported wheat is a 3.2 The Tentative Release granted by the VCRC shall,
flour miller as per attached list (Annex ÂAÊ), which shall prior to the release of the shipment from Customs custody,
form as integral part of this Order be subject to representative. For this purpose, the
1.1.2 the wheat importation consists of any of those District/Port Collector concerned shall forward to the Office
listed in Annex ÂAÊ according to the country of origin of the Commissioner the Tentative Release papers, together
1.1.3 the wheat importation is entered/unloaded in the including, but not limited to, contract of sale, phytosanitary
certificate and certificate of quality. In the case of Outports, contrary to the rule that administrative issuances are
the required documents shall be faxed to the Office of the assumed valid until declared otherwise.
Commissioner of Customs to any of these numbers: 527- On 28 February 2005, the parties agreed that the
1953/527-4573. matters raised in the application for preliminary injunction
3.3 In resolving the classification issue, the VCRC shall and the Motion to Dismiss would just be resolved together
consider the import/consignee, type/source of wheat and in the main case. Thus, on 10 March 2005, the RTC
port of discharge of the wheat importation, as indicated in rendered its Decision11 without having to resolve the
Annex ÂAÊ, and require the proofs/evidences (sic), including, application for preliminary injunction and the Motion to
but not limited to, proofs of sale or consumption of said Dismiss.
wheat importation, certificate of quality issued by The trial court ruled in favor of respondent, to wit:
manufacturing country and contract of sale.
3.4 Any VCRC decision adverse to the government shall „WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the Petition is
be subject to automatic review by the Commissioner of GRANTED and the subject Customs Memorandum Order 27-2003
Customs. is declared INVALID and OF NO FORCE AND EFFECT.
7 Rollo, pp. 158-168. Respondents Commissioner of Customs, the District Collector of
8 Records, p. 12. Subic or anyone acting in their behalf are to immedi-
670 _______________
9 Rollo, pp. 58-59.
673
II. THE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED IN DECLARING
THAT THE TRIAL COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE VOL. 664, FEBRUARY 1, 2012 673
CASE.
Commissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix Feeds Corporation
would be subjected to the conditions of CMO 27-2003. The VOL. 664, FEBRUARY 1, 2012 675
regulation calls for the imposition of different tariff rates,
Commissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix Feeds Corporation
depending on the factors enumerated therein. Thus,
respondent alleged that it would be made to pay the 7%
tariff applied to feed grade wheat, instead of the 3% tariff that petitioners should have applied the pertinent
on food grade wheat. In addition, respondent would have to provisions of Book VII, Chapter 2 of the Revised
go through the procedure under CMO 27-2003, which Administrative Code, to wit:
„Section 3. Filing.·(1) Every agency shall file with the
University of the Philippines Law Center three (3) certified copies publication, there would be no basis for the application of the
of every rule adopted by it. Rules in force on the date of effectivity of maxim „ignorantia legis non excusat.‰ It would be the height of
this Code which are not filed within three (3) months from that date injustice to punish or otherwise burden a citizen for the
shall not thereafter be the bases of any sanction against any party transgression of a law of which he had no notice
of persons. whatsoever, not even a constructive one.
xxx xxx xxx Perhaps at no time since the establishment of the Philippine
Section 9. Public Participation.·(1) If not otherwise required Republic has the publication of laws taken so vital significance that
by law, an agency shall, as far as practicable, publish or circulate at this time when the people have bestowed upon the President a
notices of proposed rules and afford interested parties the power heretofore enjoyed solely by the legislature. While the people
opportunity to submit their views prior to the adoption of any rule. are kept abreast by the mass media of the debates and deliberations
(2) In the fixing of rates, no rule or final order shall be valid in the Batasan Pambansa – and for the diligent ones, ready access
unless the proposed rates shall have been published in a newspaper to the legislative records – no such publicity accompanies the law-
of general circulation at least two (2) weeks before the first hearing making process of the President. Thus, without publication, the
thereon. people have no means of knowing what presidential decrees
(3) In case of opposition, the rules on contested cases shall be have actually been promulgated, much less a definite way of
observed.‰ informing themselves of the specific contents and texts of
such decrees.‰ (Emphasis supplied)
When an administrative rule is merely interpretative in
nature, its applicability needs nothing further than its bare Because petitioners failed to follow the requirements
issuance, for it gives no real consequence more than what enumerated by the Revised Administrative Code, the
the law itself has already prescribed. When, on the other assailed regulation must be struck down.
hand, the administrative rule goes beyond merely Going now to the content of CMO 27-3003, we likewise
providing for the means that can facilitate or render least hold that it is unconstitutional for being violative of the
cumbersome the implementation of the law but equal protection clause of the Constitution.
substantially increases the burden of those governed, it The equal protection clause means that no person or
behooves the agency to accord at least to those directly class of persons shall be deprived of the same protection of
affected a chance to be heard, and thereafter to be duly laws enjoyed by other persons or other classes in the same
informed, before that new issuance is given the force and place in like circumstances. Thus, the guarantee of the
effect of law.20 equal protection of laws is not violated if there is a
Likewise, in Tañada v. Tuvera,21 we held: reasonable classification. For a classification to be
reasonable, it must be shown that (1) it rests on substantial
„The clear object of the above-quoted provision is to give distinctions; (2) it is germane to the purpose of the law; (3)
the general public adequate notice of the various laws it is not limited to existing conditions only; and (4) it
which are to regulate their actions and conduct as citizens. applies equally to all members of the same class.22
Without such notice and Unfortunately, CMO 27-2003 does not meet these
requirements. We do not see how the quality of wheat is
_______________ affected by who imports it, where it is discharged, or which
20 Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Michel J. Lhuiller Pawnshop Inc., country it came from.
453 Phil. 1043; 406 SCRA 178 (2003).
21 220 Phil. 422; 136 SCRA 27 (1985).
_______________
676 22 Philippine Rural Electric Cooperatives Association, Inc. v. The
Secretary, Department of Interior and Local Government, 451 Phil. 683;
403 SCRA 558 (2003).
676 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
Commissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix Feeds Corporation 677
VOL. 664, FEBRUARY 1, 2012 677 quantity in which they are usually bought and sold, and
appraise the imported articles in accordance with Section
Commissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix Feeds Corporation
201 of this Code.
678
Thus, on the one hand, even if other millers excluded
from CMO 27-2003 have imported food grade wheat, the 678 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
product would still be declared as feed grade wheat, a
Commissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix Feeds Corporation
classification subjecting them to 7% tariff. On the other
hand, even if the importers listed under CMO 27-2003 have
imported feed grade wheat, they would only be made to pay
Failure on the part of the customs officer to comply with his
3% tariff, thus depriving the state of the taxes due. The
duties shall subject him to the penalties prescribed under Section
regulation, therefore, does not become disadvantageous to
3604 of this Code.‰
respondent only, but even to the state.
It is also not clear how the regulation intends to The provision mandates that the customs officer must
„monitor more closely wheat importations and thus prevent first assess and determine the classification of the imported
their misclassification.‰ A careful study of CMO 27-2003 article before tariff may be imposed. Unfortunately, CMO
shows that it not only fails to achieve this end, but results 23-2007 has already classified the article even before the
in the opposite. The application of the regulation forecloses customs officer had the chance to examine it. In effect,
the possibility that other corporations that are excluded petitioner Commissioner of Customs diminished the powers
from the list import food grade wheat; at the same time, it granted by the Tariff and Customs Code with regard to
creates an assumption that those who meet the criteria do wheat importation when it no longer required the customs
not import feed grade wheat. In the first case, importers officerÊs prior examination and assessment of the proper
are unnecessarily burdened to prove the classification of classification of the wheat.
their wheat imports; while in the second, the state carries It is well-settled that rules and regulations, which are
that burden. the product of a delegated power to create new and
Petitioner Commissioner of Customs also went beyond additional legal provisions that have the effect of law,
his powers when the regulation limited the customs should be within the scope of the statutory authority
officerÊs duties mandated by Section 1403 of the Tariff and granted by the legislature to the administrative agency. It
Customs Law, as amended. The law provides: is required that the regulation be germane to the objects
and purposes of the law; and that it be not in contradiction
„Section 1403. Duties of Customs Officer Tasked to Examine,
to, but in conformity with, the standards prescribed by
Classify, and Appraise Imported Articles.·The customs officer
law.23
tasked to examine, classify, and appraise imported articles shall
In summary, petitioners violated respondentÊs right to
determine whether the packages designated for
due process in the issuance of CMO 27-2003 when they
examination and their contents are in accordance with the
failed to observe the requirements under the Revised
declaration in the entry, invoice and other pertinent
Administrative Code. Petitioners likewise violated
documents and shall make return in such a manner as to
respondentÊs right to equal protection of laws when they
indicate whether the articles have been truly and correctly
provided for an unreasonable classification in the
declared in the entry as regard their quantity, measurement,
application of the regulation. Finally, petitioner
weight, and tariff classification and not imported contrary
Commissioner of Customs went beyond his powers of
to law. He shall submit samples to the laboratory for analysis when
delegated authority when the regulation limited the powers
feasible to do so and when such analysis is necessary for the proper
of the customs officer to examine and assess imported
classification, appraisal, and/or admission into the Philippines of
articles.
imported articles.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the Petition is
Likewise, the customs officer shall determine the unit of
DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Petition denied.
_______________
23 Romulo, Mabanta, Buenaventura, Sayoc & De los Angeles v. Home
Development Mutual Fund, 389 Phil. 296; 333 SCRA 777 (2000).
679
··o0o··