COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR)

D. LORIA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

PROPONENT’S NAME

MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: January to June 2008

I. BASIC PROJECT INFORMATION AND UPDATES

ECC Control No/Reference Code No.: ECC-R4A-0801-001-3909 dated January 1, 2008

Project Title: Bio-Ethanol Plant
Project Type: Distillation and Fermentation
Location: Sitio Maisan, Barangay Tubuhan, Nasugbu, Batangas
Project Coordinates: 14O01’28” to 14O01’37.8” North latitude and 120O51’40.9” to
120O51’51.9” East longitude
Project Stage/Phase: (i.e. construction; commissioning, etc.) Operation Phase
Contact Person: Ms. Digna Loria
Contact Numbers: (043) 569-6969
EMP Approval: [ √ ] During ECC Application Stage
[ √ ] Updated after ECC Issuance; approved on May 30, 2008
Changes in Project Design (if any): Increase in production capacity and Installation of
Additional Machineries and Equipment

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This section should include a summary of the major findings for the monitoring period. For
example, a statement that there were no major activities that influenced the monitoring
parameters during the monitoring period can be made if there were really no activities by the
proponent that affected the monitored parameters.

Table II-1. Summary of Major Findings for the Monitoring Period

Condition/Requirement/
Commitment
Compliance with ECC
Compliance with EMP
Compliance Status & Summary
of Actions Taken
Complied
Air Pollution: Dust collector was
installed and maintained
Water Pollution: Wastewater
Treatment Facility was installed
and maintained
Recommendation/Commitment
for the Next Reporting
Continuous monitoring on
compliance to ECC conditions
Continuous monitoring and
compliance to the provisions of
RA 8749, RA 9275, RA 9003 and
RA 6969 and their respective IRR

Solid Waste: Provision of

garbage bins in strategic
locations of the plant.
Implementation of proper
Segregation, Recycling, Reuse
and Disposal. Commissioned
accredited haulers

Hazardous Waste: all toxic and

Implementation of appropriate
and effective environmental
impact remedial actions in
case of exceedances
hazardous wastes are properly
stored in the designated
chemical waste room prior to
disposal by an accredited treater
The plant is operating at its Continuous monitoring and
optimum efficiency level of 80% compliance to the provisions of
and no records of exceedances RA 8749, RA 9275, RA 9003 and
that will contribute to RA 6969 and their respective IRR
environmental pollution.

The Contingency Plan and

Emergency Response Program
shall be strictly implemented in

Complaints management
Realistic and sufficient budget
for conducting the
environmental monitoring and
audit activities
Accountability – qualified
personnel are charged with the
routine monitoring of the
project activities in terms of
education, training, knowledge
and experience of the
environmental team
Others……
case of exceedances to DENR
standards
The company is an active In case of any complaints
member of an environmentalist received, the company shall
group where complaints are submit the results of the
being resolved. No complaints settlement or resolution
were received by the company undertaken by the company
from stakeholders since the
company is a law-abiding citizen
The company allocated Cost summary of budgetary
P50,000.00 for the periodic requirements and progress
sampling analyses and report shall be submitted
designated the Environmental
Officer/PCO to handle
compliance to DENR Standards
The company created an The Environmental Officer/PCO
environmental unit and shall coordinate with the EMB
designated Ms. Cheryl Duya as regarding updates on compliance
its Environmental Officer/PCO to to DENR Standards
lead and handle compliance to
DENR Standards
N/A

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

A. Compliance Monitoring

The status of compliance to the ECC conditionalities and the attainment of EMP commitments
should be elaborated in this section. Reasons for noncompliance or unmet commitment should
be explained and solutions and measures to attain full compliance of ECC terms and
conditions as well as satisfactory attainment of EMP commitments should be discussed as
renewed efforts for the next monitoring period. Table 1 may be used to summarize the status
of compliance.

Table 1. Summary Status of ECC & EMP Compliance

ECC/EMP Relevant ECC Conditions Status of
Condition/Requirement # Requirement/ Compliance Remarks
Categorization Description (√ if complying)
1 Project Coverage/ The maximum annual capacity From January to
Limits is 500,000 metric tons √ May 2008, the
plant has already
produced about
200,000 metric
tons. Increase in
capacity was
approved on
January 1, 2008
2 Components Distillation Department, √ With installation
Fermentation Department, of additional
Boiling House Department, machinery and
Power Plant, WTF, Dust equipment
Collector System, Storage Area
for raw materials and finished
products
3 Other sectoral 2 Permits/Clearances were √ Copies of permits/
requirements secured from HLURB, NWRB, clearances shall
mandated by other LGUs, DOE, DOLE, DTI, DOH, be included in the
agencies to be etc. next submission
complied with of CMR or see
Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
4 EMP and updates 1, 2, Strict implementation of the √ The updated EMP
as deemed 3, 4, approved EMP shall be
required 5, 6, 8 submitted in the
next submission
of CMR or see
 Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
5 Conduct of 6, 7 Air and Water Quality sampling √ Results of
baseline, analyses were conducted laboratory
compliance and sampling
impact self- analyses shall be
monitoring submitted in the
next submission
of CMR or see
Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
6 Multi-sectoral 17 MOA for the creation of MMT √ Copy of the MOA
monitoring (as may was approved on April 30, 2008 shall be
be required) submitted in the
next submission
of CMR or see
Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
7 Regular reporting 8 Regular submission of the √ Copy of the CMR
semi-annual CMR and quarterly and SMR shall be
SMR submitted in the
next submission
of CMR or see
Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
8 Institutional 1, 4, 5 Coordination with LGU, √ With MOA
arrangements government agencies
necessary for concerned on the Regular audit by
implementation of implementation of EMP auditors
environmental
management ISO 14000 certified
measures
9 Standard DENR 3 No transfer of ownership √ The company
requirements on shall inform EMB
transfer of on this matter
ownership
10 Standard DENR 8 No abandonment or transfer of √ The company
requirements on location shall inform EMB
abandonment on this matter
11 Impact Mitigation 1, 2, Strict implementation of the √ The updated IMP
Plan or 3, 4, approved IMP shall be
Construction/ 5, 6, 8 submitted in the
Contractor’s EMP next submission
Environmental of CMR or see
Program Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
12 Social 4 Secured employment, √ Copy of the SDP
Development Plan EMP trainings/seminars for shall be
employees, scholarship, salary submitted in the
loans, medical consultation for next submission
employees and beneficiaries of CMR or see
Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
13 IEC Plan 3 Regular consultation with the √ Copy of the IEC
EMP employees and host community Plan shall be
about the safe operation of the submitted in the
company next submission
of CMR or see
Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
14 Contingency/ 2 The company has a √ Copy of the
Emergency Contingency/ Emergency Contingency/
Response Plan or Response Plan which was Emergency
equivalent Risk incorporated in the ECC Response Plan
Management Plan application documents shall be
submitted in the
next submission
of CMR or see
 Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
15 Abandonment Plan 8 At present, no forecast of √ The Abandonment
(when applicable) abandoning the project Plan shall be
submitted 2
months prior to
abandonment
activities.
16 Environmental EMoP Incorporated in the ECC √ The updated
Monitoring Plan application documents EMoP shall be
(EMoP) submitted in the
next submission
of CMR or see
Annex ___ or
Attachment ____
17 Others………… N/A

B. Impact Monitoring

This section shall contain relevant graphical presentation of quantitative and semi-quantitative
impact monitoring results showing trends, comparing past monitoring results with the current.
Relevant monitoring results in the other SMR modules shall be referred to. The latest
monitoring findings and conclusion should be discussed in text form.

Qualitative impact monitoring results may be presented in text form or in terms of pictorial
coverage, if applicable. Examples of qualitative impacts are those relating to quality of life,
degree of happiness, and sense of environmental cleanliness.

Project Activities Predicted Impact: Mitigation/ Actual/Residual Proposed Changes

Description per Enhancement Impact to the Mitigation/
Parameter Enhancement Plan
Pre-Construction

Construction

Operation

Abandonment

i. Summary of Previous Monitoring

The key findings, recommendations, and action plan from the previous monitoring and
outstanding issues from earlier monitoring periods (if applicable) should be highlighted in this
section.

*Provide discussion and results of laboratory sampling analyses

ii. Current Monitoring Results and Findings

The data collected and related expenses from the various sampling and measurement events
done under the Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) or a Sampling and Measurement Plan
(SAMP) for the current monitoring period shall be summarized in a tabular form, preferably
using the prescribed format in Tables 2 and 3 below, and discussed under this section. Only
processed and summarized data must be presented here.

The current monitoring results must be related to the historical trend for each parameter. Any
deviation from this trend must be explained. More, importantly, the discussion must focus on
point-by-point comparison of the gathered values with Environmental Quality Performance
 Levels (EQPLs), if EQPLs have been committed by the Proponent or established with the
Multi-partite Monitoring Team. The monitoring results could also be used to determine the
action and limit levels for the specific project. These should all be presented here in detail and
summarized in the conclusions and recommendations section.

Compliances, non-compliances and exceedances must all be thoroughly explained. In cases

of compliances, success factors must be cited. For non-compliances and exceedances, the
proponent’s response should be explained. Moreover, causative factors must be identified and
additional solutions and mitigation measures proposed, if needed.

It should also cite the weather conditions and other factors which may affect the results of the
sampling activities.

The status of compliance to recommendations from previous monitoring and measures

included in the action plan should be described and any unmet commitment must be
rationalized and alternative, if needed, presented.

Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring Plan Implementation
Sampling & Measurement Standard/ Envt’l Mgt. Remarks
Monitoring Environmental Environmental Monitoring Results EIS Measures (EQPL
Objective Aspect Impact Parameter Stn/ Previous Current Prediction commitme
Loc nt, if any)
Compliance to Air emission Air pollution, TSP, SOx, Identifi *Provide *Provide Complian Provision *No
RA 8749 (Air from genset, Noise NOx, COx, ed results of results of ce to and EQPL/Not
Quality) boiler pollution, PM10, Pb, station sampling sampling DENR maintenan applicable
(equipment health O3, H2S, s analyses analyses Emission ce of
that use fuel) hazards VOC Standards CEMS, *Set limits/
stacks, warning
buffer
zone, tree
planting
Compliance to Discharge of Water BOD, COD, Identifi *Provide *Provide Complian Provision *No
RA 9275 wastewater pollution, land pH, TSS, ed results of results of ce to & EQPL/Not
(Water and effluent contamination, Temp., station sampling sampling DENR maintenan applicable
Quality) health TDS, s, analyses analyses Effluent & ce of
hazards coliform, outfall Wastewat WTP *Set limits/
E.Coli, Oil & er warning
Grease, Standards
metals
Compliance to Generation of Water *TCLP Storag *Provide *Provide Complian Provision *No
RA 6969 toxic and pollution, land *metals e area results of results of ce to RA & EQPL/Not
(Hazwaste hazardous contamination, *Those sampling sampling 6969 maintenan applicable
Mgt.) wastes health classified in analyses analyses Standards ce of
hazards Table 1-1 of storage *Set limits/
IRR, PCL area warning
Compliance to Generation of Water Volume of Within *Provide *Provide Complian Provision *No
RA 9003 solid waste pollution, land solid the volume volume ce to RA & EQPL/Not
contamination, wastes site, generated generated 9003 IRR maintenan applicable
health generated MRF ce of bins,
hazards MRF *Set limits/
warning

*EQPL-Environmental Quality Performance Level

o Alert or Red Flag - early warning

o Action Level-point where management measures must be employed so as not to reach the regulated
threshold or limit level, or to reduce deterioration of affected environmental component to pre-impact or
optimum environmental quality
o Limit Level-regulated threshold of pollutant (standard that must not be exceeded); point where emergency
response measures must be employed to reduce pollutants to lower than standard limit.
o NOTE: Section on EQPLs may be filled out as a Proponent’s draft commitment or after these have been
established and mutually agreed upon among Proponent, EMB and other MMT members. Otherwise, only
the LIMIT Level shall be the reference for regulatory compliance. This means that environmental
management measures are formulated at the “ACTION level” so as not to exceed this regulated threshold.

Table 3. Report on Status of Environmental Budget Allocations and Expenses

Budget Actual Expenses
Expense Item* Direct from Budget for Direct MMT
Company MMT Company Expenses
Expense
A. Implementation of Management Plans & Programs
1) Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan P300,000 *Provide the P300,000
 approved WFP
2) Social Development Plan P50,000 *Provide the P50,000
approved WFP
3) IEC Plan P5,000 *Provide the P5,000
approved WFP
4) Enhancement Programs (if any) N/A *Provide the N/A
approved WFP
B. implementation of Monitoring Plans
1) Self-Monitoring P100,000 *Provide the P100,000
approved WFP
2) Environmental Monitoring Fund (with *Provide the *Provide the
MMT) approved approved WFP
WFP
3) Environmental Guarantee Fund *Provide the *Provide the
approved approved WFP
WFP
TOTALS P455,000 P455,000
*For mining projects, equivalent cost items shall be adopted, e.g. SDMP in lieu of SDP.

IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This section should present the conclusions and recommendations of the current SMR based
on the results and discussion of the previous sections. It should also explain if the previous
monitoring recommendations should continue (if implemented). On the other hand, if
warranted, the recommendation may be the cessation of specific or all monitoring activities.

The conclusions and recommendations should preferably be in a bulleted format and as much
as possible grouped according to coherent themes, such as the following headings.

A. Compliance Status

Only the key conclusions about the status of compliance to ECC and EMP are included in this
section. The status of non-compliances should be particularly tracked throughout all SMRs
even if compliance has been already attained. Recommended additional measures or
amendments to the EMP should be presented here.

*Based on the presented environmental data and results of actual monitoring activities,
the company is compliant to the conditions stipulated in the ECC
*Based on the actual monitoring activities, the company complied to DENR Standards
except exceedance to ________________(parameter)due to _________________.

B. Environmental Quality Status (applicable only if EQPLs have been set by the
Proponent as its commitment or if opted to be mutually agreed upon by Proponent
with the EMB and other members of the MMT)

Only the key conclusions on meeting the set EQPLs are included in this section.

*Based on the actual monitoring activities, results of sampling analysis for air and
water quality are within the limit set forth in the DENR Standards.
*Based on the actual monitoring activities, the company complied to DENR Standards
except exceedance to ________________(parameter)due to _________________.

C. Environmental Management Plan Status

Only the key conclusions about the status of EMP implementation and recommended
additional measures or amendments should be presented here.

*Provide matrix of the approved EMP/IMP/EMS-based EMP

D. ENVIRONMENTAL RISK CATEGORIZATION

The proponent should fill-up or update the project’s environmental risk categorization
questionnaire (presented in Annex 2-7d of the Revised Procedural Manual of DAO 2003-30) –
applicable on the Second Semi-annual ECC Compliance Monitoring Report.

PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND AUDIT

PRIORITIZATION SCHEME (PEMAPS) QUESTIONNAIRE

Project Name : Bio-Ethanol Plant

Project Location : Sitio Maisan, Barangay Tubuhan, Nasugbu, Batangas
ECC Reference Nos. : ECC-R4A-0801-001-3909 dated January 1, 2008
Proponent ; D. Loria International Corporation
Pollution Control Officer : Engr. Cheryl Duya
Tel. No. : (043) 569-6969
Fax No. : (043) 569-6969
E-mail : dloria@yahoo.com
Project Type : J - Food and Related Industries J3 – Distillation & Fermentation
Project Status : Operation

I. PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS

1.1 Size and Type

1.1.1 Size based on number of employees
Number of Employees – 650
1.1.1 Type
Non-ECP and Non-ECA

1.2 Waste Generation and Management

1.2.1 Waste Type and Quantity of Wastes Generated

Category Waste Waste Type Quantity

Air Particulate Matter Non-Hazardous MT/year
Water Process Wastewater Non-Hazardous Cubic meter/year
Solid Mud cake Non-Hazardous MT/year
Fly ash Non-Hazardous MT/year
Bagasse Non-Hazardous MT/year

1.3 Pollution Control System (PCS)

1.3.1 PCS or Waste Management Method Used

Category PCS/Waste Management Remarks

Method Used
Air Wet Scrubber for Boiler Complemented by settling
Emissions basin for
solid waste collection
Water Primary Treatment – Settling Water recycling practiced,
Basins hence discharge is minimal
Secondary Treatment –
Biological
Tertiary Treatment - Biological
Solid Composting Facility /MRF Coordination with LGU,
haulers

II. PATHWAYS

2.1 Prevailing wind towards barrio? No

2.2 Rainfall (impacts surface and groundwater pathways)
2.2.1 Average annual net rainfall - 2,500 mm
2.2.2 Maximum 24-hr rainfall - 120 mm
2.3 Terrain? Flat
2.4 Is the facility located in a flood prone area? No
2.5 Groundwater
Depth of groundwater (m) Greater than 10

III. RECEIVING MEDIA/RECEPTORS

3.1 Air (Distance to nearest community) 0.5 to 1 km

3.2 Receiving surface water body
3.2.1 Distance to receiving surface water 0.5 to 1 km
 3.2.2 Size of population using receiving 20 HH
surface water
3.2.3 Fresh water
3.2.3.1 Classification of fresh water Class C
3.2.3.2 Size of fresh water body 158 sq. km. drainage area
3.2.3.3 Economic value of water use Industrial
Agricultural
3.2.4 Salt water (Estuarine water – 5 km tidally affected river segment)
3.2.4.1 Classification of salt water Class SD
3.2.4.2 Economic value of water use Industrial

3.3 Groundwater
3.3.1 Distance to nearest recharge area Greater than 1 km
3.3.2 Distance to nearest well used Greater than 1 km
3.3.3 Groundwater use for nearest well Industrial

3.4 Land
3.4.1 Indicate current/actual land uses within 0.5 km radius
Industrial
Agricultural
Residential

3.4.2 Potential/proposed land uses within 0.5 km radius

Industrial

3.4.3 Number of affected Environmentally Critical Area within 1 km

Radius? None

3.4.4 Distance to nearest ECA Greater than 1 km

3.5 Compliance (to be checked with EIAD and PCD files) Compliant
3.6 Number of valid complaints

3.6.1 Citizen and NGO None

3.6.2 Others None

IV ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE (FOR EXISTING PROJECTS FOR EXPANSION)

Law Violation Emission/Effluent/ Ambient Human Admin/ Type of Remarks/
Discharge Impact ECC Admin Status of
Violation Compliance
RA *None
8749
RA *None
9275
RA *None
6969
RA *None
1586 *Yes *Expansion
without ECC
RA *None
2003

(To be filled up by EMB personnel)

RECOMMENDATIONS:

______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________

Assessed By: ____________________

Noted By: ____________________________

E. WORK PLAN FOR NEXT MONITORING PERIOD

The specific actions for the next monitoring period, including carry-overs from previous
monitoring periods, should be detailed in this section.

- As required by conditions stipulated in the ECC -

V. ATTACHMENTS

Please have the following documents attached:

a) Laboratory Results of Analysis from DENR-EMB recognized laboratory;
b) Approved Impact Mitigation Plan in the EIS/other EIS Update Documents; and
c) Approved Environmental Monitoring Plan in the EIS/other EIS Update Documents
d) Related data

PREPARED BY: NOTED BY:

CHERYL DUYA . DIGNA LORIA .

Pollution Control Officer General Manager
D. Loria International Corporation D. Loria International Corporation
_________________________ _________________________
Date Date

Name
Designation
Company
Date