15. - 17. 5.

2013, Brno, Czech Republic, EU

MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MEDIUM CARBON DUAL PHASE STEELS

AFTER INTERMEDIATE QUENCHING

Ersoy ERİŞİR1, Serap GÜMÜŞ1, Oğuz Gürkan BİLİR1

1Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Kocaeli University, 41380-Kocaeli-Turkey

Abstract
Multi-phase microstructure gain importance increasingly in new generation steels. Dual phase (DP) steels
can be produced by the quenching from a temperature in intercritical temperatures in the phase region of
austenite and ferrite. The final microstructure is composed of martensite and ferrite. Microstructure before
the annealing at intercritical temperature can include martensite, ferrite, pearlite or austenite. The initial
microstructure affects the final morphology strongly and the annealing temperature affects the amount of
ferrite and martensite phases. Thus, the mechanical properties of dual phase steel depend on the
morphology and phase distribution. In the intermediate quenching method, the initial microstructure is fully
martensitic and final microstructure is fine and randomly scattered at former martensite boundaries in a
ferritic matrix. This type of microstructure is called fibrous microstructure. There are some difficulties in
selecting the correct etching solutions to obtain a sharply different contrast for the microstructure like this. On
this study, hot rolled medium carbon steel was employed and intermediate quenching method was applied.
Dual phase steel showed randomly distributed martensite laths in ferritic matrix in the microstructure. On the
other hand, not only martensite and ferrite but also bainite, and pearlite were observed. The work presented
here demonstrates the effect of the different etchings on the microstructure. Nital and Le Pera solutions were
applied in order to overcome the difficulties in distinguishing the different phases. Light microscope and
scanning electron microscope were carried out observing the microstructures. The Le Pera etchant was
more effective to distinguish the martensite and ferrite. On the other hand, distinguishing the bainite, retained
austenite and pearlite from martensite, same etchant was not favorable.
Keywords: microstructural characterization, dual phase steel, medium carbon steel, intermediate quenching,
phase transformation

1. INTRODUCTION
Dual phase microstructures have enormous advantages over the conventional steels with respect to good
combination of high strength, good machinability and high toughness [1, 2]. Dual phase microstructures
consist of ferrite and martensite phases as a ferrite matrix together with distributed martensite phase
commonly up to %15 volume fractions. The main application area of dual phase steels is in general limited to
the hot rolled sheets for automotive industry. Thus, many research papers are related to the low carbon
steels containing relative small amounts of martensite. In the automotive industry, carbon amount is
restricted by the machinability and weldability properties which inversely proportional to the carbon content
and amount of martensite [1-15]. However, recent studies about dual phase steels with increased amount of
martensite gained importance to strength and wear resistance. Medium carbon dual phase steels can be
used for applications in mineral and mining processes which do not require any welding operation [16, 17].
Even the obtaining a dual phase microstructure from medium carbon steels is an important challenge, there
are some difficulties. Calculating volume fractions of different phases is not as easy as low carbon steels and
also it made increase possibility of forming retained austenite, pearlite and bainite. It may be sometimes
difficult separating this phases. Therefore, because of the expectations about the differences between
microstructures of low carbon and medium carbon steels, etching solutions may differ with respect to
 15. - 17. 5. 2013, Brno, Czech Republic, EU

characterizing the different microstructures. In this study, different etching solutions applied to medium
carbon hot rolled steel to analyze the microstructure of medium carbon dual phase steels.

2. MATERIAL AND EXPERIMENTAL

Chemical composition of investigated steel is given in Table 1. The intermediate quenching experiments
were carried out in a Bähr DIL805 plastodilatometer in order to investigate the phase transformations in the
investigated steel. The standard specimen size of 5 mm diameter and 10 mm length was used for the
dilatometer experiments. The samples were annealed at 1100 ºC for 5 min and followed by gas quenching
with a cooling rate of 130 K/s to obtain fully martensitic initial microstructure. After martensitic
transformation, specimens were annealed respectively at 725, 730, 740 and 750°C for 15 min and finally gas
quenched again. The samples were metallographically prepared. After sample preparation, samples were
finally etched with Nital and Le Pera. Nital etchant contains 3% nitric acid in ethyl alcohol. Le Pera etchant is
prepared as a mixture of 1% metabisulfide in distilled water and 4% picric acid in ethyl alcohol. Light
microscope and scanning electron microscope investigations were carried out.
Table 1 Chemical composition of steel.
Chemical composition (%weight)
C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni V W Cu
0,368 0,279 0,865 0,0195 0,0063 0,0413 0,0168 0,0769 0,0021 0,0310 0,0597
Al Co Nb Ti B Zr As Pb Sn Ca
0,0472 0,0076 0,0033 0,0034 0,0012 0,0025 0,0133 0,0050 0,0055 0,0031

3. RESULTS
Dual phase microstructure of annealed sample is given in Fig. 1. The samples for SEM are Nital etched in
order to etching ferrite, pearlite and bainite while it leaves martensite unetched state. In Fig. 1, SEM
micrograph reveals the martensite islands in a ferritic matrix as well as a third phase (mixture of
bainite/pearlite) at ferrite-martensite phase boundaries. It was very hard to identify the nano-sized F/P with
light microscope as dark areas in Fig. 2. However, martensite islands (brown) and ferrite (white) can be
distinguished using light microscope.

Fig. 1 SEM micrograph of steel annealed at 730°C and intermediate quenched, M: martensite, F: ferrite, B/P:
bainite/pearlite.
 15. - 17. 5. 2013, Brno, Czech Republic, EU

Fig. 2 LM micrograph of steel annealed at 730°C and intermediate quenched, M: martensite, F: ferrite, B/P:
bainite/perlite.

3.1 Le Pera Etching

Le Pera etchant allow the distinction of ferrite (brown/blue), bainite (dark brown/black), martensite and
retained austenite (white). Fig. 3 shows the microstructures of steels annealed at 730 and 740°C after
etching with Le Pera. The third phase (dark brown/black) can be noticed in the microstructure which can be
pearlite and/or bainite. There are two possibilities that can explain the formation of pearlite/bainite. First
thought may be that pearlite/ bainite is formed before decomposition of austenite and ferrite to dual phase
microstructure. Second is the pearlite/bainite is formed during quenching from annealing temperature.
According to first thought, one may think that pearlite/bainite is already existed in martensitic initial structure
or it was formed as a result of annealing the initial martensite structure.

Fig. 3 LaPera etched microstructure of steel annealed at (a) 730°C and (b) 740°C, and followed by
intermediate quenching.
 15. - 17. 5. 2013, Brno, Czech Republic, EU

3.2 Nital Etching

Nital etchant can be alternative where Le Pera etchant cannot produce desired tinted effect in microstructural
constituents. For example, SEM investigations are required the topographic contrast for low alloyed steels in
which phases do not have enough difference in the chemical compositions to produce the material contrast
in SEM. In such a case, Nital can etch ferrite, pearlite and bainite while martensite remains unetched
condition. Figs. 4 and 5 show micrographs of LM and SEM after Nital etching. In Fig. 4, dual phase
microstructure can be seen with the third phase as in Le Pera etching in Fig. 3. However, it can be said that
Nital is better to recognize the Widmanstätten type ferrite (white). Monotype coaxial ferrite is seen in Le Pera
etched samples in Fig. 3. However, according to intermediate quenching, there must be fibrous
microstructure consist of martensite and ferrite which can be seen in Nital etched samples. This is due to
Nital has a better performance on obtaining grain boundaries. However, in point of the calculating phase
distributions, separating the Widmanstätten ferrite and martensite from fibrous complex microstructure is not
easy. La Pera etching may be useful to fulfill this difficulty for the image analysis studies. SEM micrographs
are given in Fig 5. Ferrite seems darker than martensite on the contrary LM micrographs after Nital etching.

a) b)

c) d)
Fig. 4 LM micrographs of steels annealed at a) 725, b) 730, c) 740, and d) 750°C, and followed by
intermediate quenching; etchant: Nital.
 15. - 17. 5. 2013, Brno, Czech Republic, EU

a) b)

c) d)
Fig. 5 LM Micrographs of steels annealed at a) 725, b) 730, c) 740, and d) 750°C, and followed by
intermediate quenching; etchant: Nital.

4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The advantages and disadvantages of applying Le Pera and Nital etchants to medium carbon dual phase
steels were demonstrated. Martensite seemed lighter (light brown) and ferrite seemed darker colors
(brown/blue) in Le Pera etched samples, while martensite is brown and ferrite is white in Nital etched
samples. A third phase (bainite/pearlite) is also seen in black color and nearly same contrast in Le Pera and
Nital. The third phase may be obtained due to quenching product from annealing temperature. As a result of
microstructural investigations with different etchants, Nital is favorable to understand all microstructure, while
Le Pera is not as good as Nital for obtaining grain boundaries and Widmanstätten ferrite. Therefore, it is
concluded that Le Pera is better for using in image analysis for phase distributions for medium carbon dual
phase steels.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are grateful to Yapı-Tek Çelik Sanayi A.Ş., Kocaeli, Turkey for the supplement of the
alloy and to Dr. U. Prahl for access to a precision dilatometer.
 15. - 17. 5. 2013, Brno, Czech Republic, EU

REFERENCES
[1] OLIVER, S., JONES, T.B. and FOURLARIS, G. Dual Phase versus Trip Strip Steels: Microstructural Changes as
a Consequence of Quasi-Static and Dynamic Tensile Testing. Materials Characterization, 2007, Vol. 58, Issue: 4,
page 390–400.
[2] SPEICH, G. R. Dual Phase Steel ASM Handbook Volume 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels and High
Performance Alloys section. ASM International, 2005, page 697-707.
[3] OBENCHAIN, W. A., SCHAIK, M. V., PETERSON, P. Green Engineering Case Study: Reducing Automobile
Emissions and Saving Energy. ULSAB – Advanced Vehicle Concepts, American Iron and Steel Institute, 2012
page. 1-16.
[4] DAVIES, R. G. Influence of Martensite Composition Content on the Properties of Dual Phase Steels. Metallurgical
and Materials Transactions A, 1978, Vol. 9, page 671-679.
[5] DEMIR, B., ERDOGAN, M. The Hardenability of Austenite with Different Alloy Content and Dispersion in Dual-
Phase Steels. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, Vol. 208, Issue: 1-3, page 75–84.
[6] SARWAR, M., PRIESTNER, R. Hardenability of Austenite in a Dual-Phase Steel. Journal of Materials
Engineering and Performance, 1999, Vol. 8, Nr. 3, 380-384.
[7] ERDOGAN, M., TEKELI, S. The Effect of Martensite Particle Size on Tensile Fracture of Surface Carburised AISI
8620 Steel with Dual Phase Core Microstructure. Materials and Design, 2002, Vol. 23, Nr. 7, page 597–604.
[8] BAYRAM, A., UGUZ, A., ULA, M. Effects of Microstructure and Notches on the Mechanical Properties of Dual-
Phase Steel. Materials Characterization, 1999, Vol. 43, Nr. 4, page 259–269.
[9] AHMAD, E., MANZOOR, T., ZIAI, M.M.A., HUSSAIN, N. Effect of Martensite Morphology on Tensile Deformation
of Dual-Phase Steel. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2011, Vol. 21, Nr. 3.
[10] MODI, O.P., PANDIT, P., MONDAL, D.P., PRASAD, B.K., YEGNESWARAN, A.H., CHRSANTHOU, A. High-
stress abrasive wear response of 0.2% carbon dual phase steel: Effects of microstructural features and
experimental conditions. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2007, Vol. 458, page 303–311.
[11] KORZEKWA, D.A., MATLOCK, D. K., KRAUSS, G. Dislocation Substructure as a Function of Strain in a Dual-
Phase Steel. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1984, Vol. 15, Nr. 6, page 1221-1228.
[12] BAYRAM, A., UGUZ, A. Effect of Microstructure on the Wear Behaviour of a Dual Phase Steel.
Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 2001, Vol. 32, Nr. 3, page 249-252.
[13] MOHAVED, P., KOLAHGARA, S., MARASHIA, S.P.H., POURANVARI, M., PARVINA, N. The Effect of
Intercritical Heat Treatment Temperature on The Tensile Properties and Work Hardening Behavior of Ferrite–
Martensite Dual Phase Steel Sheets. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2009, Vol. 518, Nr. 1, page 1-6.
[14] KELESTEMUR, O., YILDIZ, S. Effect of various dual-phase heat treatments on the corrosion behavior of
reinforcing steel used in the reinforced concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, Vol.23,
page 78 –84.
[15] KUZIAK, R., KAWALLA, R., WAENGLER, S. Advanced high strength steels for automotive industry. Archives of
Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2008, Vol. 8, Nr. 2, page 104-117..
[16] TYAGI, R., NATH, S. K., RAY, S. Effect of Martensite Content on Friction and Oxidative Wear Behavior of 0.42
Pct Carbon Dual-Phase Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2002, Vol. 33, page 3479-3488.
[17] TYAGI, R., NATH, S. K., RAY, S. Development of wear resistant medium carbon dual phase steels and their
mechanical properties. Materials Science and Technology,2004, Vol. 20, page 645-652.