Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
High Performance
Organizations
© 2011 UC Berkeley
Agenda
• Teams within a Product Development “System”
• Calibrating our definition of “Team”
• Four essential Teamwork elements; operating within an
environment/culture conducive to teams
• Interpersonal effectiveness: Foundation for respectful and
trusting relationships
• Other key contributing aspects
– General Management attitude
– Empowerment
– Leadership
– Peer review
– Recognition & Rewards
© 2011 UC Berkeley 2
New Product Development (NPD)
System
Planning Product
Development
Product Planning
Business Process
Strategy Technology Planning Team & System
MRD/
PRD/ Development
Technology Development FRD
© 2011 UC Berkeley
Planning
© 2011 UC Berkeley 4
Product Development Process
© 2011 UC Berkeley 5
Business Management
© 2011 UC Berkeley 6
Functional Excellence
© 2011 UC Berkeley 7
Ongoing Team & NPD System
Development
© 2011 UC Berkeley 8
A Culture of Teamwork –
Essential Environmental Aspects
© 2011 UC Berkeley 9
Teamwork in Product Development
© 2011 UC Berkeley 10
Sample NPD Core Team
Dev.
Eng “Dedicated” members
(I know what team(s) I support)
Team Prod.
Leader/PM Mktg
Responsible for
decision-making as
“general managers”
Supply
Operations
Chain Ensure deliverables from
functions, by phase,
SW/ASICS unquestionably
© 2011 UC Berkeley 11
“Team” Continuum
Collection High
Group Team
of individuals performing team
© 2011 UC Berkeley 12
The Discipline of Teams
What are Katzenbach’s key “discipline” elements?
© 2011 UC Berkeley 13
Definition of a Team
© 2011 UC Berkeley 14
Four Critical Ingredients in Teams
© 2011 UC Berkeley 16
Sample Team Charter
Context
• Problem Statement
• Some of the root cause issues
• Deliverable (s)
• Timeline/Key Milestones/Gates/Criteria
• Measurement (s) of Success
© 2011 UC Berkeley 18
A Closer Look at the Role of the
PM/Team Leader
We are generally skilled at identifying, monitoring, and
achieving the TASKS of being a PM.
T
A
S
K
S
RELATIONSHIPS
© 2011 UC Berkeley
Team Leadership Competencies
Personal/Functional Capability
Focus On Interpersonal
Results Character
Skills
Leading Change
© 2011 UC Berkeley
Some Basic Leadership Styles*
A
S Style Leads Through
S
E
Direct Taking Charge
R
T
I Spirited Inspiring
V
E Considerate Group Harmony
N
E Systematic Careful Planning
S
S EXPRESSIVENESS
© 2011 UC Berkeley
Key Procedures for Effective Teams
Decision Making
What process shall we use? Are we about consensus,
majority rules, deference to expert, or …?
Effective Meetings
Focus on making key, timely decisions together vs.
status/update; disciplined use of decision logs and action
items
Communication
Who speaks for the team, to whom, about what? (See also,
what agreements we make about how we’ll communicate
within the team?)
© 2011 UC Berkeley 22
Relationships on Effective Teams
Connection
Do I know more about you than merely the function, skill
set, or perspective you represent on this team?
Communication
Do we all appreciate that working together effectively under
high stress and/or time pressure will require each of us to
be aware of and “flex” our preferred communication modes?
Are we all willing to practice ongoing feedback (giving and
receiving, +/-)?
Collaboration
As we work together, what adjustments might we consider
to make optimal use of each others’ unique abilities while
compensating for challenge areas?
© 2011 UC Berkeley 23
A Teamwork
Exercise
© 2011 UC Berkeley 24
Interpersonal Effectiveness
© 2011 UC Berkeley 25
Some Behaviors Characteristic of
Leading Without Authority
• Ethical: Clear about their values, goals, expectations. Do what
they say they will. Willing to admit to mistakes.
• Well-Connected: Know where to go for information and willing
to share what they know.
• Collaborative: Ask vs. Tell. Offer ideas as part of a broader
solution. Model behaviors they would like to see.
• Effective influencers: Pull vs. push. Not controlling,
manipulative or impatient. Relate personally, helping to bring
the vision alive for others.
• Conflict Managers: Able to look beneath conflict to identify
solutions. Know when and how to use different approaches to
resolve conflict.
• Learn From Experience: Continually examining +/-outcomes.
Use lessons learned to quickly adjust.
• Give and Solicit Feedback: Coach formally and informally and
see feedback as a natural part of building relationships.
© 2011 UC Berkeley
Dimensions That Influence Team
Effectiveness
• Clear and shared goals or purpose
• Effectively defined roles/responsibilities
• Disciplined team processes and procedures
• Supportive and empowering relationships
• Nurturing and challenging leadership
• Evolving energy and spirit
• Productivity and performance
• Complete, purposeful and uplifting communication
© 2011 UC Berkeley 27
Checklist for Evaluating Whether
a Group is a Team
• Is the group small enough in number to convene and
communicate easily, to have open, interactive discussion, and to
understand members’ roles and responsibilities?
© 2011 UC Berkeley 28
Effective Team Characteristics
© 2011 UC Berkeley 29
Characteristics of High Performing
Teams
• Alignment - A deep sense of vision or purpose that is shared
among team members
• Team Effectiveness - Strong internal processes that allow
coordinated efforts, such as shared values, trust, open
communication, flexibility, and decision making
• Empowerment - Feeling empowered to do what is
necessary; personal and collective power
• Passion - High and sustained levels of energy, enthusiasm,
excitement, and confidence
• Commitment - Deep allegiance to the purpose of the team
and to each other
• Results - Accomplishing outstanding results based on
high standards
© 2011 UC Berkeley 30
How Do Teams Help New Product
Development?
• More effectively manage complex and short life cycle products
• Develop multiple products simultaneously
• Reduce development cycle time
© 2011 UC Berkeley 31
General Management Thinking, Acting
© 2011 UC Berkeley 32
Accountability and Empowerment
© 2011 UC Berkeley 33
Leadership
© 2011 UC Berkeley 34
Peer Review Elements –
Team “Performance Management”
• Results
• Functional Expertise
• Team Process
• Leadership
© 2011 UC Berkeley 35
Team Compensation Is Tied to Team
Performance
© 2011 UC Berkeley 36
Team Recognition and Reward
© 2011 UC Berkeley 37
Collaborative Cups Configuration
© 2011 UC Berkeley
Becoming a Team Player
© 2011 UC Berkeley 39
Interdependencies
© 2011 UC Berkeley 40
Learning Wrap Up
© 2011 UC Berkeley 42
Leading Teams &
High Performance
Organizations
© 2011 UC Berkeley