Thesis SHSLSEI

LAKE SHORE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION
A Bonifacio St. , Canlalay, Binan, Laguna
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
STEPHEN KRASHENS INPUT HYPOTHESIS: THE EFFECTIVENESS

OF THE TEACHER IN USING SECOND LANGUAGE IN
INTELIGIBLE LEARNING OF STUDENTS
A Thesis Presented to
The Faculty of General Academic Strand
of Lake Shore Educational Insitution
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

For the subject Research II
By:
Aguila, Rochelle A.
Arroyo, Maria Trisha M.
Buco, John Carl C.
Calala, Honey Lyka T.
Cruz, Hanna Joyce
Freo, Jhonaliza L.
Hora, Rhode Cyril L.
Isabelo, Paul Liera G.
Levantino, Jenelle M.
March 2018
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
INTRODUCTION
Language is one of the important means of communication. For such exposure to language,
learners easily adapt these languages. Nowadays, teachers tend to use second language in teaching a
subject. The learner improves and progresses when he or she receives the input or second language and
helps the issue of whether and how to use the students understand the second language in teaching or
education.
According to the researchers’ source, input hypothesis also known as monitor model is a group of
five hypothesis of second language acquisition developed by Stephen Krashen. It explains how the learners
acquire second language. This hypothesis is only concerned with acquisition not learning. There are two
independent system of second language the acquisition and learning. Acquisition is the product of
subconscious process very similar to the process where children acquire their first language, and learning
is the product of a subs conscious formal instruction which result in conscious knowledge about language.
Second language makes the learners to improve their understanding. Sometimes learners have a
hard to understand if the teacher uses unfamiliar words or languages and do not have enough vocabulary
that students want to satisfy their mind to understand the thoughts of the teacher. On the other hand, teacher
use graphical or visual aids just to help the student to understand the lesson more even if they use second
language. To test if the learners understand the lesson, even if the teachers uses second language, teachers
give some quizzes, exercises and other exam just to know or prove that the learner understand the lesson.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
With this information, the researchers want to conclude the effectiveness of the acquisition of
second language to help the students find a way to understand and use it.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Teaching English as a second language is a quite complex task for a teacher. Language learning
should be more fun and enjoyable for students to learn. Teachers need to have effective teaching strategies
in order for students to grasp better in learning English. It is important for a teacher to facilitate students’
interest towards learning the English Language. (Amjah, 2014)
The aim of this research is to prove the effectivity of Stephen Krashens Input Hypothesis which
will deal on how does teaching using the second language may affect the performance of the students in
English subject.
Pre-test was given to the select grade 7 students of Lake Shore Educational Institution to determine
their schema. The researchers summed up the result of the pre-test. After the pre-test, classroom
demonstration took place. A researcher served as the demonstrator, where she demonstrated the topic
indicated in the post-test. The demonstration was delivered using the second language. Post-test was
given to the same respondents after the classroom demonstration to determine if there was a relationship
between the performance of the students and the use of second language in delivering the lesson.
From the finding there were few recommendations used by teachers in developing students’ interest
towards learning using the second language. There were also recommendations for the students to boost
their interest in learning using the second language. With the findings, the researchers were expecting that
the teachers will help the students to boost their confidence in learning using the second language, that will
lead the students in enhancing their achievements in learning through second language.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
This study aimed to determine the “Stephen Krashens Input Hypothesis: The Effectiveness of The
Teacher in using Secondary Language in Term of intellegiable Learning of Students”.
Specifically, it will seek answers to the following questions formulated by the researchers:
1. What is the performance of the select grade 7 students in the pre-test?
2. What is the performance of the select grade 7 students in the post-test?
3. Is there any relationship between the performance of the students’ pre-test and post-test, and the
use of second language in delivering the lesson?
STATEMENT OF THE HYPOTHESIS
For clearer understanding on how the problems under the study was dealt with the research hypothesis
was formulated:
There is a relationship between the performance of the students and the use of second language in
delivering the lesson.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The following term is conceptually defined the purpose of this study to facilitate common
understanding:
Particular – specific meaning or thought
Progresses – the process of developing or improving
Acquire - a skill that gain on your own effort
Learning - the knowledge or skill that you gain on studying
Subsconscious - an action or thought that you’re not fully aware
Conscious - aware of something that will keep you thinking
Understanding - a way of something that you understand
Unfamiliar - not familiar
Satisfy - contented to something
Second Language – pertains to international language used

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY
The results of the study would be of great help to those who are delivering the lesson using the
second language.
It is hoped that the study will be beneficial to the following:
To the School Heads. They will be cognizant on the problem of the teachers in improving the
academic achievement of the students in different language using the secondaru language; thus, awareness
of the importance of second language as potential aid to the teaching-learning process.,
To the Teachers. This study will be of a great help; the outcome may reveal important aspects in
delivering the lesson daily using the second language that need to be given emphasis in order to perform
well in academics.
To the Parents. They may be informed about the use of the second language in delivering the lesson
so that they will guide their children in doing their tasks.
To the Students. Improvement in academics will surely redound to the benefit of the students. This
may help the student to use the second language and to overcome the anxiety in using the second languge
in classroom interaction that will surely boost their confiedence in expressing themselves.
To the Future researcher. The study will help the future researcher to be more effective and
knowledgeable about the effectivity of Stephen Kreshner Input Hypothesis. And the relationship between
the performance of the students and the use of second language in delivering the lesson.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Target
Population
SELECTION PRE-TEST
RESULT
INTERVENTION
COMPARISON
RESULT POST-TEST
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURES AND STUDIES
FOREIGN LITERATURE
Bennhardt (32) believes that is important to recognize that second language is a new and different
literacy. A such it is complex social and psycholinguistic process that cannot be separated into reading
components and language components. Indeed, it can be hypothesized that second language is in part
dependent of first language literacy and other language operations.
Pit Corder and Larry Selinker (2009). Corders essay rejected the SLA's point of view about the
second language acquisition in which the contents of his essay are the significnt of learner's errors. While
Larry Selinker's article argued that second language learners
possestheir own linguistic styles that are independent from both the first and second language.
This article continues the debate sparked by Cook (2001) in the most recent issue of Canadian
Modern Language Review examining when and how much the target language (TL0 should be used in
second language (SL) and foreign language (FL) teaching, and why. In this paper, I agree with Cook that
SL and FL teachers would minimize thei use of the TL; I also argue that doing so benefits that students’ TL
proficiency. Aside from agreeing with cook that there is an indeed place for the teacher to use the students
L1 in SL and FL teaching, I also highlight some disadvantages when teachers rely too extensively on the
L1. I also call into question what maximize really means in terms of an optimal or acceptable amount of
when and how much the target language (Tl) should be use in second language (SL) and foreign language
(FL) teaching, and why. In this paper, I agree with Cook that SL or FL teachers should maximize their use
of the TL; I also argue that doing so benefits students’ TL proficiency. Aside from agreeing with cook that
there is indeed a place for the teacher to use the students’ L1 in SL and FL teaching, I also highlight some
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
disadvantages when teachers rely to extensively on the L1. I also call into questions what maximize really
means in terms of an optimal or acceptable amount of TL and L1 use by teachers.
(Hoekje, 2012) State the Tips for Effective teaching with international and English as a Second
Language (ESL) students. 1. Early identification Screen students without adequate language or academic
preparation and refer them to appropriate resources as early as possible (noting that high conversational
abilities do not necessarily predict high literacy skills). Require early assignment that tests comprehension
and academic production skills, such as a summary of the main points of the day’s lecture or reading. 2.
In the classroom. Build inclusive classroom communities Learn students’ names and use them smoothly
Encourage participation through various mechanisms of calling on students (such as round robin; assigned
reporting roles) index cards with questions collected from each person Use different participation structures
for discussions (not only full group discussions, but small group with “report back” summaries, etc.
Require an early assignment where students can meet others in class by name and contact info. 3.
Managing the workload Help students manage the academic workload Make expectations about reading
assignments explicit esp. relationship between the lecture and reading In large reading assignments, point
out key sections Avoid folksy, highly idiomatic language on syllabus or in reading texts Give models and
other examples of good work Develop and post rubrics for evaluation Give interim due dates (drafts) 4.
Assessment create fair testing environments. Make sure the intent of test questions is clear: Give a chance
for students to ask questions to clarify question intent; Give ungraded quizzes throughout the term so
students can be familiar with your testing style; Establish one achievable standard for all (use of standard
English including spelling checker; errors that don’t interfere with comprehensibility) Allow paper, not
electronic dictionaries
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Local Literature
The Philippines is recognized globally as one of the largest English-speaking nations, with the
majority of its population having at least some degree of fluency in the language. English has always been
one of the country's official languages and is spoken by more than 14 million Filipinos. It is the language
of commerce and law, as well as the primary medium of instruction in education. Enhancing the teaching
of second language in Philippines presents opportunities for the country in the area tourism. "To maintain
the Philippines' strenght as a major ESL destination, we need to address the gap in qualified ESL schools.
This also includes explloring how can we extend incentives to ESL schools and teacher," Renee Marie
REyes, the chief of the ESL Market DEvelopment group under the deparment of tourism said at the
roundtable. The DOT is encouraging local ESL schools to offer structured tour packages to ESL learners,
the majority of whom come to south Korea, China, Russia, and Japan, by incorporating English-Learning
activities in the travel experience. (Mike Cabigon-Philippine Daily Inquirer)
Research in the world Englishes (WE) and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) have long been
promoting what Pakir describes as common working axioms (2009:228) which uphold the pluricentricity
of English: the existence of varieties, the acceptance of language change and adaption, the highlighting of
discourse strategies. These principles have profound effects on understanding of the english language and,
consequently on the teaching of the language. In this paper, I argue that, for all the benefits offered by
varieties of english, it not might be appropriate to teach varieties explicitly as a model to non-native learners
of the language. I make this argument with the Philippine Education context in the mind and propose a
framework for Philippine ELT that recognizes both the identity and communication fubctions of the
language. (Isabel Pefianco Martin,2004)

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
As announced in DepED Memoramdum No. 560, s. 20008 (special program in second
language), public and private secondary schools are encouraged to offer foreign languages. The schools
offering the program are advised to follow this guidelines: Subject Nomenclature, description, time
allotment, unit credits , assessment , qualification and compensation of Teachers and instructional and
facilities. Schools are encouraged to offer any of the foreign language initially as a pilot for two years.
appropriate adjustments shall be made on the curriculum based on the results of the monitoring and
evaluation of the program.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Foreign Studies
Kimura (iv) conducted a study to investigate second language listening anxiety (L2 listening
anxiety) among university students learning english in Japan and demonstrate that L2 listening involves
social concerns that are specific to L2 settings. Successful performance in aural interaction presupposes
mutual understanding, and L2 listeners have good reason to become anxious when it is doubtful whether
they properly comprehend what others say. The verbal data suggested that L2 listening anxiety was
receiver specific in that it involved concerns over comprehending and responding appropriately to aural
messages. They also indicated that the levels of L2 listening anxiety were (a) susceptible to individual
differences, (b) influenced by different social situations.
Matt Purland, the man behind (www. Englishbanana. com), has shared a whole host of useful
english language teaching resources based on his philosophy of demystifying the english language. Find
that introduction to the you are the course book method, together with an amusing explanation of why and
how he designed it after years of frustration working in english schools. You are the book course two
offers more. Matt’s talk a lot english course is another great set of resources. Start with the foundation to
help students get from written words on page to spoken english using sounds, stressv and connected speech.
Fine elementary ook one, which is complete 12- week spoken english couse for beginners, elementary book
two and book three. Students can take their english learning to the next level with internidiate book one.
The goal of this study was determining the overall effects of pronunciation instruction (PI) as well
as the sources and extent of variance observed effects. Towards this end, a comprehensive search for
primary studies was conducted, yielding 86 unique reports testing the effects of PI. Each study was then
coded on substantive and methodological features as well as study outcomes (Cohen’s d). Aggregated
results showed a generally lsrge effect of P1 (d= 0. 89 and 0. 80 for N- weighted within- and between-
group contrasts =, respectively.) In addition, moderator analyses revealed large effects for (I) longer
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
interventions, (ii) treatments providing feedback, and (iii) more controlled outcome measures. We interpret
these and other results with respect to their practical and pedagological relevance. We also discuss the
findings in relation to instructed second language acquisition research generally and in comparison, with
other reviews of PI (e. g. Saito 2012). Our conclusion points out areas of PI research in need of further
empirical attention and methodological refinement
(Amjah, 2014) Teaching English as a second language is a quite complex task for a teacher.
Language learning should be more fun and enjoyable for students to learn. Teachers need to have effective
teaching strategies in order for students to grasp better in learning English. It is important for a teacher to
facilitate students’ interest towards learning the English Language.
All good teachers must be good planners. (Costa and Garmston 1985, as cited by Met, 2014)
have suggested that good teaching rests on good planning. They indicate that the planning phase of the
teaching process requires high levels of thought and may be the most important element in successful
teaching. According to Costa and Garmston, good teachers see each lesson in terms of long-range and
short-term instructional goals. They think about the lesson from the viewpoint of the learner and
consider how individual learning styles, preferences, and abilities will interact with the lesson to be
delivered. They envision the lesson as it will unfold (almost as though viewing a video in their head).
Effective teachers plan with precision, identifying what they and their students will be doing in each part
of the lesson, anticipating areas that may cause difficulty, and ensuring that time and materials needed
for the lesson will be available.
Teachers who educate students in a non-native language need to do all of the above. But their
unique charge requires that they perform additional planning tasks as well. These include sequencing
objectives, planning for language growth, identifying instructional activities that make content accessible,
selecting instructional materials appropriate to students' needs, and planning for assessment. (Met,
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
2014)
Second (or foreign) language classroom research is research that is carried out in the language
classroom for answering important questions about the learning and teaching of foreign languages. This
kind of research derives its data from either genuine foreign language classrooms (classrooms
specifically constituted for the purposes of foreign language learning and teaching) or in experimental
laboratory settings that are set up for research. These experimental settings are sometimes established
to replicate or recreate what happens in language classrooms, although often laboratory settings make
no pretense at such replication. (Nunan, 1990)
Regarding the role of the teacher in a second language classroom, I believe that a teacher who is
the center of attention always—leading each activity, calling on students one-by-one to respond, and
talking for nearly the whole class time (whether in the students’ native language or the target language)—
will feel burdened and 9 overwhelmed. (Lee and VanPatten, 2003 as cited by Logan, 2014) call this
type of role, in which the teacher is “the authority, the expert, the central figure in the classroom who
transmits knowledge to the students” the Atlas complex. Early his teaching career, in a high school
Spanish language classroom, he experienced the Atlas complex, and he believe his students did not reach
their full potential because he did not give them enough opportunities to use the language in a meaningful
way. (Logan, 2014)

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Local Studies
Go, Lucas and Miraflores (1994) conducted a study to determine the causes of anxiety in english
language learning of students in the Philippines. Findings suggest that these types of learners used
vocabulary strategy to efficiently learn the english language and to cope with their english class anxiety.
Two hundred fifty students were the respondents of this study. The target participants were college students
taking any course in these institutions provided that they are enrolled in any english course during the time
of the administration of the questionnaire. It has been found that the employment of this strategy enables
the learners to take charge of their own learning as this serves as their basics aids tp learn other macro skills
in the target language.
Sagucio, Dahlia. (2016). CONTENT AREA EFFECTIVENESS: ENGLISH VS FILIPINO
MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. 2. The rate of
students who get low grades in the content areas is alarming, particularly in the subjects of Sciences and
Mathematics. Among the different factors affecting level of achievements as considered by several studies,
is the Language factor. The teaching of subjects in the content area in Philippine schools uses English as
a Second Language (ESL), wherein a certain mastery of the English language must preceed, to
understanding more of the subject. It is of great importance for teachers to evaluate the methods and
techniques used in the process of teaching their subjects to raise level of performances of the students. This
mini research aims to see the result of an evaluation of a classroom instruction while using monolingual
instruction in ESL, or L2 that is English instruction, as compared with the use of bilingual instruction, in
this case Filipino (the native language in the Philippines) and English combination. It is the hope of the
researcher that the information gathered from this endeavor shall provide an insight for language educators
and mathematics teachers to join forces in developing students' linguistic, verbal, and logical-mathematical
intelligences.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
(Gaerlan, 2016) Despite being bilingual in Filipino and English, not all Filipino learners are
successful in learning in English which is their second language (L2) and the MOI in Philippine schools.
Majority of research on learning course content in a L2 have investigated the factors that lead to successful
learning. However, for a complete picture of learning in a L2, factors that render a learner “less successful”
must also be explored as this may lead to a better understanding of this group of learners. In this study, 15
Filipino high school ESL learners were interviewed about their learning in English. They were selected
from four schools in Metro Manila (two public, two private) through purposive sampling method. The
qualitative investigation was carried out from a constructivist/interpretivist research paradigm (Ponterotto,
2005) and data were analyzed with the Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR) methodology (Hill,
Thompson, & Williams, 1997; Hill et al. , 2005). A central finding is that the participants are not motivated
to use or learn in English. They do not see English as part of or necessary to their future, and even if they
do, they do not seem to want to exert too much effort to use the language The study sheds light on the actual
lived experiences of Filipino high school students who are ESL learners as to their learning strategies,
learning goals, and the difficulties they experience in learning in their L2.
(Abao, 2013) In the 21st century, effective communication is considered the bedrock towards
globalization. In the Philippines, English communication is made the medium of instruction. Some state
universities and colleges in the country like Cebu Normal University Integrated Laboratory School, students
in the elementary and high school department are taught in English by the student teachers. Observations
noted that the latter still lack the proficiency of the language. It is therefore the aim of this study to assess
the Bachelor of Secondary Education and Bachelor of Elementary Education-student teachers’ English
communication skills in oral and written discourses and their teaching performance. Using the Pearson –
r correlation, finding revealed that both groups are comparatively better in oral than in written
communication. About teaching performance, both groups show satisfactory results. There is however a
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
low relationship between the English communication skills and the student teachers’ teaching performance.
If a student teacher is equipped to teach, he/she can still perform well with the consciousness that facility
of the language still needs to be continually enhanced. Based on the mentors’ comments and students’
observations, the student teachers’ second language facility serves as an opportunity for the latter towards
wider exposure in various oral communication setting as well as a challenge to realize the need for more
comprehensible communication of ideas. With the belief that facility of the language helps usher meaning
learning, then appropriate and relevant training is a potent avenue to ensure consistency of purpose.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
This chapter outlines the research design, the research method, the population under study, the
sampling procedure, and the method that will use to collect data. The reliability and validity of the research
instrument will be addressed. Ethical considerations pertaining to the research will also be discussed.
RESEARCH DESIGN
This study employs descriptive - qualitative research design since the researchers compare the
result of the pre-test and post-test of the select grade 7 students.
This study presents a numeric value on the data gathering which will be explain through narrative
description.
Survey research is applied with the use of a checklist. It serves as a tool to produce mixed method
descriptions of some aspects of the study population. It serves as a tool in locating significant variables in
a field. It concerns with the condition or relationships that will exists, or trends that will develop.
Survey analysis may be primarily concerned either with relationship with the variables, or with
projecting findings descriptively to a predefined population. Survey research is a mixed method requiring
standardized information from and or about the subjects that will study. It will first conduct to students to
answer the pre-test based on their schema. Next is a researcher will serve as a demonstrator to discuss the
topic given in the pre-test and will use the second language in delivering the classroom demonstration.
Third is, same students will be given post-test to compare the result of their pre-test and post-post test. The
answers will constitute to the data to be analyse.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
The objective of the study is to prove the effectivity of Stephen Krashens Input Hypothesis which
is about the effectiveness of using the second language in delivering the lesson. Score of the pre-test and
post-test will be compared to show if there is a change of results after delivering the classroom
demonstatrion using the second language. The study aims to come up with the recommendation and
suggestion to the students and teachers.
The researchers were guided by the following research principles: the first one is the qualitative
research is based on a “world view” which is holistic and has the following beliefs: (1) there is not a single
reality based upon perceptions that are different for each persons and change overtime and (2) what we
know has meaning only within a given situation of context (Ross, J, 1999).
The second one is the descriptive research. It is descriptive because it describes the differences of
the result of the scores of the pre-test and post-test given to the select Grade 7.
The above principles served as the guidelines for the implementation of the research design adopted
in this study.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
The researchers chose their respondents from grade 7 students’ and was chosen using the random
sampling technique in selected private secondary school in Biñan city.
The researchers preferred to use the grade 7 students of the selecty private secondary school because
they were on their adjustment perion. Adjustment period is said to be the transition of student from primary
school to secondary school.
The respondents of the research were 12% of the total population of the grade 7 students. They
chose 49 students, the chose 7 students each in 7 sections of grade 7. These respondents where been chosen
through Random Sampling Techniques. These sampling techniques determined the target population,
those to be involved in the study.
In order to guarantee equality and objectivity, the researchers used the fish bowl technique wherein
the students name was placed in a bowl and draw it by section. Then the reserachers picked 7 names each
section. The respondents’ identity will be confidential and only the researchers and the cooperating
teachers were informed.
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The instruments used in the study was made and developed by the authors. The “pre-test” used was
checked and validated by the research adviser. Meanwhile, the researchers and the research adviser agreed
to have a follow up “post-test”. It was again enhanced and validated by the research adviser.
The “pre-test” was used to determine the prior knowledge of the students on the specific topic of the
chosen subject. Based from the scores of the pre-test, the researchers come up with the item analysis
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
aiming the result of the pre-test and on what item got most wrong answer. The post-test would show if
improvement took place after delivering the lesson through second language.
These instruments were used for two days. These were enough to find out their performance before
and after delivering a lesson through second language. Perhaps, the researchers may know and compare
the difference between the result of their developed pre-test nad post-test.
DATA GATHERING PROCEDURE
The prior step of the researchers in gathering data was submission of a letter to the principals
endorsed by the course adviser, asking permission if they may use the grade 7 students of Lake Shore
Educational Institution, school year 2017 – 2018 as their respondents.
Then, made a pre-test wherein the respondents answered it based on their prior knowledge. It was
administered to the respondents which were answered with the supervision of the researchers. The results
were tallied, and the item analysis were listed to know where do the students got much mistakes. From
that pre-test, they came up to a post-test which intended to show the difference of the score of the
respondents.
It was again administered to the respondents. Afterwards, it was being tallied and the weighted
mean was computed. The result was examined and finding the relationship of the performance of the
students and the use of second language in delivering the lesson

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
STATISTICAL TREATMENT
After collecting the and gather the needed information, the researchers used the statistical treatment
using the frequency table to analyze the give data. Frequency Table is used to determine on what percent
of the total number of population of the respondents got the right and wrong answer. Afterwards,
comparing the result of the pre-test and the post-test given after discussing the topic using the secondary
language.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION
To complete the research with appropriate research guidelines research ethics is very important.
Considering ethical aspects of research, enough time was given to the respondents of the study so that they
can show their insights about the research questions. The data gathered was used in this study. Consents
from the respondents were taken and appropriate permission was ensured for usage of their given data.
Confidentiality of the responses was maintained strictly to ensure privacy of their data. The disclosure of
respondents’ identity was based on their permission where if they are not willing to reveal their identity,
their identity was not shown.
The study assured the respondents the level of confidentiality. It avoided harmful effect from all
the respondents. The study had no effect with the college and officials. It respected individual and
maintain privacy.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This section presents and analyzes the findings of the study regarding the effectivity of
Stephen Krashens Input Hypothesis in grade 7 in select private secondary school in City of Biñan.
Table 1
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Narra (Test I)
Number of Correct Number of Wrong

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 1 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 - Narra. It is indicated
in the test 1, items 1 to 6 all the students got the right answer.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 2
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Narra (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
in the test 2 that 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number
1. 1 or 14. 29% of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 2. 6 or 85.
71% of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 3. 1 or 14. 29% of
total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 4. 7 or 100% of total population
of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 5. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 –
Narra got the correct answer for item number 6. On the other hand, 1 or 14. 29% of the total number of
population of Grade 7 – Narra got wrong answer for item number 1. 6 or 85. 71% of the total number of
population of Grade 7 – Narra got wrong answer for item number 2. 1 or 14. 29% of the total number of
population of Grade 7 – Narra got wrong answer for item number 3. And, 6 or 85. 71% of the total number
of population of Grade 7 – Narra got wrong answer for item number 4.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 3
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Narra (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
3 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
6 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
in the test 3 that 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number
1. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 2 and 3. 6
or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 4. 4 or 57. 14%
of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 5. 5 or 71. 43% of total
population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for item number 6. On the other hand, 2 or 28. 57%
of the total number of population of Grade 7 – Narra got wrong answer for item number 2, 3 and 6. 1 or
14. 29 of the total number of population of Grade 7 – Narra got wrong answer for item number 4. And, 3
or 42. 86% of the total number of population of Grade 7 – Narra got wrong answer for item number 5.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 4
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Mahogany (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 4 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 - Mahogany. It is
indicated in the test 1, items 1 to 3, 7 and 8 all the students got the right answer. 6 or 85. 71% of total
population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer for item number 4. On the other hand, 1 or 14.
29% of the total number of population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got wrong answer for item number 4.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 5
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Mahogany (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
2 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
5 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
6 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
Table 5 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 -Mahogany. It is
indicated in the test 2 that 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 –Mahogany got the correct answer
for item number 1. 2 or 28. 57% of total population of Grade 7 –Mahogany got the correct answer for
item number 2. 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer for item
numbers 3 and 6. 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 –Mahogany got the correct answer for item
number 4. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 –Mahogany got the correct answer for item number
5.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 6
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Mahogany (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
2 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
3 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
4 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
5 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
6 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
Table 6 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 -Mahogany. It is
indicated in the test 3 that only 1 or 14. 29% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct
answer for item numbers 1 and 6. 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct
answer for item numbers 2 and 4. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct
answer for item number 3. And, 2 or 28. 57% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct
answer for item number 5.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 7
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Ipil (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 7 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 - Ipil. It is indicated
in the test 1, items 1 to 6 all the students got the right answer. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 –
Ipil got the correct answer for item number 1. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the
correct answer for item number 2. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer
for item number 3. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number
4. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number 5. 7 or 100%
of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 8
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Ipil (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
2 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
5 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
in the test 2 that 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number
1. 2 or 28. 57% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item numbers 2 and 6. 6
or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item numbers 3 and 5. 1 or 14.
29% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number 4.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 9
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Ipil (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
3 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
6 2 28. 57 5 7143 7 100
in the test 3 that 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item numbers
1 and 4. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item numbers 2 and
3. 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number 5. 2 or 28.
57% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 10
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Molave (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 10 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 - Molave. It is
indicated in the test 1, items 1 to 6 all the students got the right answer. 7 or 100% of total population of
Grade 7 – Molave got the correct answer for item number 1. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 –
Molave got the correct answer for item number 2. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got
the correct answer for item number 3. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got the correct
answer for item number 4. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got the correct answer for
item number 5. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got the correct answer for item number
6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 11
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Molave (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 6 75. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 12
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Molave (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
3 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
4 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
5 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
6 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 13
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Kamagong (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 13 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 - Kamagong. It is
Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for item number 1. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7
– Kamagong got the correct answer for item number 2. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 –
Kamagong got the correct answer for item number 3. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong
got the correct answer for item number 4. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the
correct answer for item number 5. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 14
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Kamagong (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
2 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
3 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
4 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
5 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
indicated in the test 2 that 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for item 1 and 5. 2 or 28. 57% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for item
number 2. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for item
numbers 4 and 6. 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for item
number 5.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 15
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Kamagong (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
2 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
3 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
4 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
5 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
6 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
indicated in the test 3 that 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for item number 1. 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for
item numbers 2, 4, and 5. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for item number 3. And, 1 or 14. 29% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for item number 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 16
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Acacia (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 16 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 - Acacia. It is
indicated in the test 1, items 1 to 3, 5 and 6 all the students got the right answer. 7 or 100% of total
population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item numbers 1 to 3, 5 and 6. 6 or 85. 71% of
total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number 4.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 17
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Acacia (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
2 0 0 6 100 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
5 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
6 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
indicated in the test 2 that 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for
item number 1. No one or 0% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item
number 2. 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number
3. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number 4. And,
5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item numbers 5 and 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 18
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Acacia (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
3 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
4 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
5 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
6 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
indicated in the test 3 that 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for
item number 1. 1 or 14. 29% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item
numbers 2 and 3. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item
number 4. 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number
5. 2 or 58. 57% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 19
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Yakal (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 19 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the pre-test of grade 7 - Yakal. It is
Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item numbers 1 to 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 20
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Yakal (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
2 1 14. 29 6 85. 71 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 4 57. 14 3 57. 14 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
indicated in the test 2 that 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for
item number 1. 1 or 14. 29% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item number
2. 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item number 3. 4 or
57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item number 4. And, 7 or 100%
of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item numbers 5 and 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 21
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Yakal (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
3 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
4 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
5 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
6 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
item number 1. 2 or 28. 57% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for items 2
and 3. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for items 4 and 5. And,
4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item number 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 22
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Narra (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 22 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the Post-Test of grade 7 - Narra. It is
Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for items 1 to 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 23
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Narra (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for items 1 to 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 24
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Narra (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 6 87. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
Grade 7 – Narra got the correct answer for items 1 to 4. 6 or 87. 71% of total population of Grade 7 –
Narra got the correct answer for item 5. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Narra got the correct

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 25
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Mahogany (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 25 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the Post-Test of grade 7 - Mahogany. It
is indicated in the test 1, items 1, 5 and 6 all the students got the right answer. 7 or 100% of total population
of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer for items 1, 5 and 6. And, 6 or 85. 71% of total population
of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer for items 2, 3 and 4.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 26
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Mahogany (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
is indicated in the test 2 that 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer
for items 1, 3 and 5. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer for
item number 2. 2 or 28. 57% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer for item
number 4. 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer for item number
6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 27
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Mahogany (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
5 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6 3 85. 71 4 57. 14 7 100
is indicated in the test 3 that 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer
for items 1, 2, 3, and 5. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer
for item number 4. And, 3 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Mahogany got the correct answer
for item number 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 28
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Ipil (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 28 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the Post-Test of grade 7 - Ipil. It is
Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item 1 to 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 29
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Ipil (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 2 28. 57 5 71. 43 7 100
5 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
6 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
indicated in the test 2 that 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for
items 1 and 3. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number
2. 2 or 28. 57% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for item number 4. And 5 or
71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for items 5 and 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 30
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Ipil (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
2 5 71. 43 2 71. 43 7 100
3 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
4 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
5 5 71. 43 2 71. 43 7 100
6 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
indicated in the test 3, that 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for
items 1 and 3. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for numbers 2 and
5. 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Ipil got the correct answer for numbers 3 and 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 31
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Molave (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 31 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the Post-Test of grade 7 - Molave. It is
Grade 7 – Molave got the correct answer for items 1 to 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 32
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Molave (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
indicated in the test 2, that 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got the correct answer for
item number 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6. While, 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got the correct

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 33
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Molave (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % F % f %
Test I.
1 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
2 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
3 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
6 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
indicated in the test 3 that 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got the correct answer for
number 1, 2, and 4. And, 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Molave got the correct answer for
items 3, 5, and 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 34
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Kamagong (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
3 5 81. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6 5 81. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
Table 34 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the Post-Test of grade 7 - Kamagong. It
is indicated in the test 1 that. 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for item number 1. 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for
items 2, 4, and 5. And, 5 or 81. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for items 3 and 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 35
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Kamagong (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
2 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
3 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
4 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
5 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
6 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
is indicated in the test 2 that 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for items 1, 3, and 5. 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for
items 2 and 4. While 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer for
item number 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 36
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Kamagong (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
is indicated in the test 3 that 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for items 1,2 and 5. While, 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Kamagong got the correct answer
for numbers 3, 4, and 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 37
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Acacia (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 37 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the Post-Test of grade 7 - Acacia. It is
Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number 1 to 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 38
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Acacia (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
indicated in the test 2 that 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for
items 1, 3, 5, and 6. 6 or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item
number 2. And, 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item
number 4.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 39
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Acacia (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
3 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
4 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
5 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
6 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
indicated in the test 3 that 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item
number 1. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for items 2 and 3.
6 or 85. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number 4 and 6. And,
5 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Acacia got the correct answer for item number 5.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 40
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Yakal (Test I)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 7 100 0 0 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 7 100 0 0 7 100
5 7 100 0 0 7 100
6 7 100 0 0 7 100
Table 40 shows the frequency distribution and the result of the Post-Test of grade 7 - Yakal. It is
Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for items 1 to 6.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 41
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Yakal (Test II)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 7 100 0 0 7 100
2 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
3 7 100 0 0 7 100
4 4 57. 14 3 42. 86 7 100
5 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
6 6 85. 71 1 14. 29 7 100
indicated in the test 2 that 7 or 100% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for items
1 and 3. 5 or 71. 43% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item number 2.
While, 4 or 57. 14% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item number 4. 6
or 85. 71% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for numbesr 5 and 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 42
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students Section Yakal (Test III)

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
2 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
3 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
4 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
5 5 71. 43 2 28. 57 7 100
6 3 42. 86 4 57. 14 7 100
items 1 to 6. And, 3 or 42. 86% of total population of Grade 7 – Yakal got the correct answer for item
number 6.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 43
Result of Pre-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % f %
Test I.
1 49 100 0 0 49 100
2 49 100 0 0 49 100
3 49 100 0 0 49 100
4 47 95. 92 2 4. 08 49 100
5 49 100 0 0 49 100
6 49 100 0 0 49 100
Test II.
1 32 65. 31 17 34. 69 49 100
2 13 26. 53 36 73. 47 49 100
3 42 85. 71 7 14. 29 49 100
4 22 44. 90 27 55. 10 49 100
5 43 87. 76 6 12. 24 49 100
6 36 73. 47 13 26. 53 49 100
Test III.
1 38 77. 55 11 22. 45 49 100
2 27 55. 10 22 44. 90 49 100
3 26 53. 06 23 46. 94 49 100
4 33 67. 35 16 32. 65 49 100
5 28 57. 14 21 42. 56 49 100
6 23 46. 94 26 53. 06 49 100

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 43 shows the frequency table of the result of the pre-test given to all respondents,
select grade 7 of select private secondary school in Biñan City. The test was consisting of 3 parts
and each part of the test was consisting of 6 items. To sum it up, the pre-test was 18 items. In
part 1, items 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6, 49 or 100% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
correct answer. And, 47 or 95. 92% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
answer in item 4. While the remaining 2 or 4. 08% got it wrong.
In part 2 of the above table, 32 or 65. 32% of the total number of respondents in grade 7
got the correct answer and 17 or 34. 69% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
wrong answer in item number 1. 13 or 26. 53% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got
the correct answer and 36 or 73. 47 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong
answer in item number 2. In item number 3, 42 or 85. 71 % of the total number of respondents
in grade 7 got the correct answer and 7 or 14. 29% of the total number of respondents in grade 7
got the wrong answer. In item number 4, 22 or 44. 90% of the total number of respondents in
grade 7 got the correct answer and 27 or 55. 10% of the total number of respondents in grade 7
got the wrong answer. In item number 5, 43 or 87. 76 % of the total number of respondents in
grade 7 got the correct answer and 6 or 12. 24% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got
the wrong answer. In item number 6, 36 or 73. 47 % of the total number of respondents in grade
7 got the correct answer and 13 or 26. 53% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
wrong answer.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
In part 3 of the pre-test in table 43, 38 or 77. 55 % of the total number of respondents in
grade 7 got the correct answer and 11 or 22. 45% of the total number of respondents in grade 7
got the wrong answer in item number 1. 27 or 55. 10% of the total number of respondents in
grade 7 got the correct answer and 22 or 44. 90 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7
got the wrong answer in item number 2. In item number 3, 26 or 53. 06 % of the total number of
respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 23 or 46. 94% of the total number of respondents
in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In item number 4, 33 or 67. 35% of the total number of
in grade 7 got the wrong answer.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
3. Is there any relationship between the performance of the students’ pre-test and post-test, and the use of
second language in delivering the lesson?
Table 44
Result of Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students

Total
Answers Answers
Item
Number f % f % F %
Test I.
1 49 100 0 0 40 100
2 47 95. 92 2 4. 08 40 100
3 46 93. 88 3 6. 12 40 100
4 47 95. 92 2 4. 08 40 100
5 48 97. 96 1 2. 04 40 100
6 47 95. 92 2 4. 08 40 100
Test II.
1 45 91. 84 4 8. 16 40 100
2 36 73. 47 13 26. 53 40 100
3 45 91. 84 4 8. 16 40 100
4 31 63. 27 18 36. 73 40 100
5 43 87. 76 6 12. 24 40 100
6 43 87. 76 6 12. 24 40 100
Test III.
1 42 85. 71 7 14. 29 40 100
2 41 83. 67 8 16. 33 40 100
3 37 75. 51 12 24. 29 40 100

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
4 38 77. 55 11 22. 44 40 100
5 37 75. 51 12 24. 49 40 100
6 30 61. 22 19 38. 76 40 100
Table 44 shows the frequency table of the result of the pre-test given to all respondents,
select grade 7 of select private secondary school in Biñan City. The test was consisting of 3 parts
and each part of the test was consisting of 6 items. To sum it up, the pre-test was 18 items. In
part 1 of the above table, 49 or 100% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
answer in item number 1. 47 or 95. 92% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
correct answer and 2 or 4. 08% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer
in item number 2. In item number 3, 46 or 93. 88% of the total number of respondents in grade
7 got the correct answer and 3 or 6. 12 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
wrong answer. In item number 4, 47 or 95. 92% of the total number of respondents in grade 7
got the correct answer and 2 or 4. 08% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong
answer. In item number 5, 48 or 97. 96 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
correct answer and 1 or 2. 04% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer.
In item number 6, 47 or 95. 92% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
answer and 2 or 4. 08% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer.
In part 2 of the above table, 44 or 91. 84 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7
answer in item number 1. 36 or 73. 47% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
correct answer and 13 or 26. 53% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong
answer in item number 2. In item number 3, 45 or 91. 84% of the total number of respondents in
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
the wrong answer. In item number 4, 31 or 63. 27% of the total number of respondents in grade
wrong answer. In item number 5, 43 or 87. 76 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7
wrong answer. 43 or 87. 76 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
answer and 6 or 12. 24% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer.
In part 3 of the pre-test in table 44, 42 or 85. 71% of the total number of respondents in
the wrong answer in item number 1. 41 or 83. 67% of the total number of respondents in grade
wrong answer in item number 2. In item number 3, 37 or 75. 51% of the total number of
in grade 7 got the wrong answer.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Table 45
Comparison of Result of the Pre-Test and Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students
Number of Correct Answers

Item
Post Test Pre-Test Difference
Number
f % f % F %
Test I.
1 49 100 49 100 0 0
2 47 95. 92 49 100 -2 -4. 08
3 46 93. 88 49 100 -3 -6. 12
4 47 95. 92 47 95. 92 0 0
5 48 97. 96 49 100 -1 -2. 04
6 47 95. 92 49 100 -2 -4. 08
Test II.
1 45 91. 84 32 65. 31 13 26. 53
2 36 73. 47 13 26. 53 23 46. 94
3 45 91. 84 42 85. 71 3 6. 12
4 31 63. 27 22 44. 90 9 18. 37
5 43 87. 76 43 87. 76 0 0
6 43 87. 76 36 73. 47 7 14. 29
Test III.
1 42 85. 71 38 77. 55 4 8. 16
2 41 83. 67 27 55. 10 14 28. 57
3 37 75. 51 26 53. 06 11 22. 44
4 38 77. 55 33 67. 35 5 10. 20
5 37 75. 51 28 57. 14 9 18. 37

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
6 30 61. 22 23 46. 94 7 14. 29
Table 46
Comparison of Result of the Pre-Test and Post-Test Given to the Select Grade 7 Students
Difference
Item
Test 1 Test 2 Test 3
Number
% % %
1 0 26. 53 8. 16
2 -4. 08 46. 94 28. 57
3 -6. 12 6. 12 22. 44
4 0 18. 37 10. 20
5 -2. 04 0 18. 37
6 -4. 08 14. 29 14. 29
Average -2. 72 18. 71 17. 01
Table 46 shows the comparison of the result of the post-test and the pre-test of the select
grade 7 students. Generally, in part one of the tests, no improvement was shown, and the result
was negative. In the part two of the tests, improvement was shown, and the result was positive.
And lastly, in part 3, improvement was shown, and the result came as positive.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Chapter 4
DISCUSSION
This chapter shows the summary of the finding, conclusion, and recommendations of the study
entitled stephen krashens input hypothesis: the effectiveness of the teacher in using second language in
inteligible learning of students.
FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
This study was conducted to determine the effectivity of using second language in delivering
the lesson. It showed relationship between the performance of the students’ pre-test and post-test, and
the use of second language in delivering the lesson. The researchers used the pre-test to know the
prior knowledge of the student and the post-test to test the effectivity of delivering the lesson using
the second language. The questionnaire was being validated by their professor which was their
adviser.
After the validation of the research instruments, the researchers then proceeded in tabulating
the result. The researchers used the fish bowl random sampling technique in chosing their
respondents. The grade 7 was consist of 7 sections and 7 students were chosen per section. To
sum it up the total number of respondents were 49.
1. Pre-test shows the frequency table of the result given to all respondents, select grade 7 of
select private secondary school in Biñan City. The test was consisting of 3 parts and each part of
the test was consisting of 6 items. To sum it up, the pre-test was 18 items. In part 1, items 1, 2,
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
3, 5, and 6, 49 or 100% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer. And,
47 or 95. 92% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer in item 4.
While the remaining 2 or 4. 08% got it wrong. In part 2 of the above table, 32 or 65. 32% of the
total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 17 or 34. 69% of the total
number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer in item number 1. 13 or 26. 53% of the
total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 36 or 73. 47 % of the total
number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer in item number 2. In item number 3, 42
or 85. 71 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 7 or 14. 29%
of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In item number 4, 22 or 44.
90% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 27 or 55. 10% of
the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In item number 5, 43 or 87. 76
% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 6 or 12. 24% of the
total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In item number 6, 36 or 73. 47 %
of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 13 or 26. 53% of the total
number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In part 3 of the pre-test in table 43, 38
or 77. 55 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 11 or 22.
45% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer in item number 1. 27 or
55. 10% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and 22 or 44. 90 %
of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer in item number 2. In item
number 3, 26 or 53. 06 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and
23 or 46. 94% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In item
number 4, 33 or 67. 35% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
26 or 53. 06% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer.
2. Post-test shows the frequency table of the result given to all respondents, select grade
7 of select private secondary school in Biñan City. The test was consisting of 3 parts and each
part of the test was consisting of 6 items. To sum it up, the pre-test was 18 items. In part 1 of
the above table, 49 or 100% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer
in item number 1. 47 or 95. 92% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
answer and 2 or 4. 08% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer in
item number 2. In item number 3, 46 or 93. 88% of the total number of respondents in grade 7
got the correct answer and 3 or 6. 12 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
correct answer and 1 or 2. 04% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer.
In item number 6, 47 or 95. 92% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
answer and 2 or 4. 08% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In
part 2 of the above table, 44 or 91. 84 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
correct answer and 4 or 8. 16% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
in item number 1. 36 or 73. 47% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
answer. In item number 4, 31 or 63. 27% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the
answer. 43 or 87. 76 % of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct answer and
6 or 12. 24% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the wrong answer. In part 3 of the
pre-test in table 44, 42 or 85. 71% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
item number 1. 41 or 83. 67% of the total number of respondents in grade 7 got the correct
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
wrong answer.
Conclusion
The researchers therefore conclude that:
1. It can be gleaned from the data that delivering the lesson using the second language was
effective. Positive result was shown in the performance of the students in comparing the
result of the pre-test and the post-test.
2. There is a relationship between the performance of the students’ pre-test and post-test, and the use
of second language in delivering the lesson
Recommendation
1. Parents must be aware of their child’s daily activities in order to guide them in expressing
themselves in using the second language.
2. Teacher provides activities which involve real life scenarios using the second language for the
students to remember what they have learned especially those activities that are connected to
their daily routines.
3. Teacher must encourage the students to use the second language in the teaching-learning
process.
4. Students must be aware of their grammar for them not to be conscious in expressing
themselves using the second language.

SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
5. Parents must support their students in practicing on their home.
6. Future researchers may have a follow up research to further determine the effectivity of
Stephen Kreshen Input Hypothesis. Thus, other variable must also be considered to make the
study more substantial and beneficial to the researchers, teachers, students and the
stakeholders.
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
Bilbliography
https://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1877042814031486
A Study of Teachers’ Strategies so Develop Students’ Interest

towards Learning English as a Second Language☆
Author Yusimah Amjah
http://carla. umn. edu/cobaltt/modules/strategies/met1994_2/teaching. pdf
Met, M. “Teaching Content Through a Second Language. ” (1994)
Mimi Met
https://www. researchgate.
net/publication/299477353_CONTENT_AREA_EFFECTIVENESS_ENGLISH_VS_FILIPINO_MEDIUM_OF_INS
TRUCTION
Sagucio, Dahlia. (2016). CONTENT AREA EFFECTIVENESS: ENGLISH VS FILIPINO MEDIUM OF
INSTRUCTION. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. 2. 1514-1529. 10. 20319/pijss.
2016. s21. 15141529.
http://www. dlsu. edu. ph/conferences/dlsu-research-congress-proceedings/2016/LLI/LLI-II-01. pdf
LEARNING IN A L2: An analysis of less successful Filipino ESL learners’ experiences through Consensual
Qualitative Research Marianne Jennifer M. Gaerlan De La Salle University marianne. gaerlan@dlsu.
edu. ph
SENIOR HIGH-SCHOOL
SECOND LANGUAGE FACILITY OF STUDENT TEACHERS IN THE PHILIPPINES: AN OPPORTUNITY OR A
CHALLENGE? Ethel L. Abao Cebu Normal University Cebu City, Philippines
Tips for Effective teaching with international and English as a Second Language (ESL) students Dr.
Barbara Hoekje (hoekje@drexel. edu; 215 895-2067)
https://www. ericdigests. org/pre-9216/second. htm
Second Language Classroom Research
Author: Nunan, David
Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC.
Briggs, Martin, "Second Language Teaching and Learning: the Roles of Teachers, Students, and the
Classroom Environment" (2014). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 377.
https://digitalcommons. usu. edu/gradreports/377

Thesis SHSLSEI

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Thesis SHSLSEI

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

LAKE SHORE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION

A Bonifacio St. , Canlalay, Binan, Laguna

STEPHEN KRASHENS INPUT HYPOTHESIS: THE EFFECTIVENESS

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

Arroyo, Maria Trisha M.

Buco, John Carl C.

Calala, Honey Lyka T.

Cruz, Hanna Joyce

Hora, Rhode Cyril L.

Isabelo, Paul Liera G.

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

interest towards learning the English Language. (Amjah, 2014)

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Teacher in using Secondary Language in Term of intellegiable Learning of Students”.

1. What is the performance of the select grade 7 students in the pre-test?

2. What is the performance of the select grade 7 students in the post-test?

use of second language in delivering the lesson?

STATEMENT OF THE HYPOTHESIS

delivering the lesson.

SCOPE AND DELIMITATION

Particular – specific meaning or thought

Progresses – the process of developing or improving

Acquire - a skill that gain on your own effort

Learning - the knowledge or skill that you gain on studying

Subsconscious - an action or thought that you’re not fully aware

Conscious - aware of something that will keep you thinking

Understanding - a way of something that you understand

Unfamiliar - not familiar

Satisfy - contented to something

Second Language – pertains to international language used

IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY

It is hoped that the study will be beneficial to the following:

of the importance of second language as potential aid to the teaching-learning process.,

so that they will guide their children in doing their tasks.

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURES AND STUDIES

dependent of first language literacy and other language operations.

Larry Selinker's article argued that second language learners

means in terms of an optimal or acceptable amount of TL and L1 use by teachers.

activities in the travel experience. (Mike Cabigon-Philippine Daily Inquirer)

language. (Isabel Pefianco Martin,2004)

As announced in DepED Memoramdum No. 560, s. 20008 (special program in second

evaluation of the program.

differences, (b) influenced by different social situations.

empirical attention and methodological refinement

facilitate students’ interest towards learning the English Language.

for the lesson will be available.

no pretense at such replication. (Nunan, 1990)

way. (Logan, 2014)

in the target language.

Sagucio, Dahlia. (2016). CONTENT AREA EFFECTIVENESS: ENGLISH VS FILIPINO

MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. 2. The rate of

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

result of the pre-test and post-test of the select grade 7 students.

answers will constitute to the data to be analyse.

suggestion to the students and teachers.

SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES

sampling technique in selected private secondary school in Biñan city.

school to secondary school.

those to be involved in the study.

teachers were informed.

DATA GATHERING PROCEDURE

Educational Institution, school year 2017 – 2018 as their respondents.