LOG

CHARACTERS
 Spontaneous Potential Resistivity
(millivolts) (-ohms, m /m)
2

100 ft

Well-sorted Sandstone

Muddy Sandstone

Shale

An example of log responses and their lithologic interpretation.

 INDUCTION - ELECTRICAL LOG
SELF - POTENTIAL RESISTIVITY CONDUCTIVITY
millivolts ohm - m millimbos/m 2

SP 1300 1000 900 0

- + 45” INDUCTION
mv 0 10” normal 10

0 induction 10
4 D”

8100

SANDS

SHALES SILTY SMALES

8200

Lithology interpretation from induction – electrical log

 RESISTIVITY CORRELATION CURVE DIP RESULTS FROM
PERCENT FROM COMPUTED DIPMETER FROM POOLED CLUSTER
BULK VOLUME RESISTIVITY INCREASES AFTER STRUCTURE DELETION

0 100
1 FT. X 0.5 FT. X 20°
0° 30° 60° 90°

SP

?
5400

GAMMA
RAY

5500

5600

Detail dip analyses compared with other log responses (Allen G.P., 1998)
 Sandstone Deposit

Clay/Shale Deposit

Sandstone Deposit

FMI CHARACTERS
 COAL

General coal transformation

Plant fragments
⇓
Peat
⇓
Lignite
⇓
Bituminous coal
⇓
Anthracite coal
 EXAMPLES OF LOG MARKERS

4 km
GR R FDC CNL Continuous marker
Organic
shale Datum
Organic
shale

Note: 50’
No channel
Channel

CLAST.389

GR R
CNL FDC hT

marine shale shift

coal or
carbonate

delta plain
shale

An example of coal layer within wireline log responses.

 RESERVOIR
CHARACTERIZATION
 RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION

• Porosity
• Permeability Reservoir
• Heterogeneity
Characterization
• Homogeneity
• Dimension
models
• Width/thickness ratio
 Sealing fault
X Semi-sealing fault
Son-sealing fault

Y Boundaries genetic units

Permeability zonation
Z within genetic units

[ Baffles within genetic units

Lamination,
\ Cross-bedding

Microscopic heterogeneity,
] Textural types,
meneralogy

Fracturing - Tight
^ - Open

Classification of reservoir heterogeneity types (from

Weber, K.J.; How heterogeneity Affects oil Recovery).
Eight basic types and models of reservoir bodies in fluvial
depositional characterized. Adopted from Miall (1985).