Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RE V: 0
J ULY 2019
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1
Scope 2
CHAPTER 2
General 3
Criteria for expansion joint 5
Suggested procedure 6
CHAPTER 3
General 8
Methods 9
CHAPTER 4
Expansion joints in long building 11
CHAPTER 5
Our Observations 12
1
Chapter
1
1.1 SCOPE
Due to the variation of temperature, there is contraction and expansion in
structural element and if this is not within tolerable limit then there is a
chance of crack. To avoid cracking, we purposely introduce provision in
structural element so that in can have the movement (due to expansion
and contraction) without any interruption.
2
Chapter
2
EXPANSION JOINTS IN BUILDINGS
As Per “Federal Construction Council. Technical Report No. 65”
2.1 GENERAL
3
Tw = the temperature exceeded, on the average, only 1% of the
time during the summer months of June through September in the
locality of the building.
e. Material of construction.
4
2.2 CRITERIA FOR EXPANSION JOINTS
The need for thermal expansion joints in buildings may be determined initially on
an empirical basis. If results are deemed by the designer to be too conservative or
if the empirical approach is not sufficiently comprehensive to be applicable to the
type of structure being investigated, a more precise analysis should be
undertaken. In either case, the following criteria should be utilized in the absence
of more rational approaches.
i) Empirical Approach:
(a) If the building will be heated only and will have hinged-column bases, use
the allowable length as specified.
5
(b) If the building will be air conditioned as well as heated, increase the
allowable length by 15% (provided the environmental control system will
run continuously);
(c) If the building will be unheated, decrease the allowable length by 33%;
(d) If the building will have fixed-column bases, decrease the allowable length
by 15%
(e) If the building will have substantially greater stiffness against lateral
displacement at one end of the plan dimension, decrease the allowable
length by 25%.
When more than one of these design conditions prevail in a building, the
percentile factor to be applied should be the algebraic sum of the adjustment
factors of all the various applicable conditions.
For those situations in which the need for thermal expansion joints can’t be
determined on an empirical basis or in which the empirical approach provides a
solution that professional judgment indicates is too conservative, a detailed
analysis should be performed.
a. Expansion joints should extend over the entire height of the building from
the top of the foundation footing (or perimeter base wall) through the roof.
The resulting two separate but adjacent structural frames may share the
same footing.
UB = 6*10-6*∆te*L
L= effective length
6
c. To allow the construction tolerances and compressibility and expandability
of the joint sealants, the expansion joint width (W), in inches, should be as
follows:
W = C1 * UB
Where, C1 = 2.0 for unheated building, 1.7 for building heated but to air
conditioned, or 1.4 for buildings for both heated and air conditioned.
d. For buildings with continuous exterior bearing walls of clay masonry, the
maximum spacing of the expansion joints should be limited to 200 ft (60m),
and the minimum required joint width (W), in inches, should be calculated
from the following expression:
W = C1*L*(50ºF. ∆te)(4*10-6)
7
Chapter
3
JOINTS IN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
Reported by ACI Committee 224
3.1 GENERAL
a. All buildings are restrained to some degree; this restraint will induce
stresses with temperature changes.
8
3.2 METHODS
b. These rules are generally quite conservative and rage from 30 to 200 ft (9
to 60 m) depending on the type of structure.
d. Two of these methods are presented by Martin and Acosta 1970, National
Academy of Sciences 1974.
e. Pfeiffer and Darwin (1987) used those two procedures along with a third by
Varyani and Radhajii (1978) to obtain expansion joint spacing for two
reinforced concrete frames.
9
j. First, the maximum allowable building length between joints decreases as
the maximum difference between the mean annual temperature and the
maximum/minimum temperature increases.
l. The lower and upper bounds of 60 and 200m were a consensus, but have
no experimental or theoretical justification.
10
Chapter
4
EXPANSION JOINTS IN LONG BUILDING
4.1 ABROAD
In the 1940s a distinct trend started toward the elimination of expansion joints in
long buildings. This trend is continuing into the present time. Even in locations
with large temperature ranges, building up to 120 and 150 m have been
constructed without expansion joints, and seemingly the performance has been
satisfactory. The following are examples of such buildings
b. The Los Angeles union Terminal has a seven-storey, flat slab warehouse
550x100ft in plan, with 20x20 ft bays, as well as a four-storey building
440x100 ft in plan. According to an inspection report of 1958, both
buildings were in excellent condition after 40 to 50 years, showing no
distress due to lack of expansion joints.
4.2 IN OMAN
a. Sultan Center, Qurum, Oman, with 60X65 m in plan without any expansion
joint. This structure is designed by AL-HATMY.
b. Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque at Sohar: Expansion joint spacing is 65 m.
The structural design of this mosque is done by the author.
11
Chapter
5
OUR OBSERVATION
12