Good morning ladies and gentleman.

Honorable to the judge, moderator, time keeper, my

beloved negative team and all of the audience. Thank you for the opportunity that given to us.
We are the government team from AB 4A.. And please let me introduce our self. The first
speaker …….. will deal with corruption regarded from law, the second speaker ……………..
speak about afford to prevent corruption by death penalty, and the third speaker …….. talk about
exclusive law and court for the corruptor.
Okay ladies n gentleman I would like to give our motion today, our motion is that this house the
Government of Republic Indonesia supports to use the death penalty for corruptors
Ladies and gentlemen.

Here government of republic indonesia agree with the motion stating that the corruptors must get
death penalty. There are some reasons why I can say this. Those can be looked upon some point
of views:

1.Regarded from law.

Here I would like to give some reasons regarding law constitution.

Ladies and gentlemen.

Based on constitution 1999 no. 31 article 2 stating that death penalty can be executed in a certain
condition and it is really a must to be done including fining death penalty upon the corruptor.

If the death penalty really be executed it will give a shock therapy for the corruptor because all of
corruptors will be afraid to do corruption again. Then the candidate of new corruptor will think
twice or maybe 3 times, 4 times, 5 times up to hundreds time to do corruption because if they
will perpetrate corruption they will get death penalty.

Ladies and gentlemen.

When we are watching television, reading newspaper or listen to radio, corruptor is mainly
discussed as the hottest issue. This case are found everywhere, either in countryside or big cities
the corruptor can be whoever having a chance to do it.

It can occur at all levels of our society, such as from local and national government. Those are
like the leader of village, representative of citizen and up to the highest level.

If the bad condition is not done soon by firm sanction, what will happen with the country in the
future ladies and gentlemen?
Here the firmest sanction for the corruptor they must get death penalty. If the corruptor gets only
a sentence in prison, they can still feel the freedom. For example: one of the corruptor in our
country has got a sentence in prison but he can still go anywhere, even in jail he got luxurious
facilities, like air conditioner, LCD player, and even they can go out of the prison.

Please you imagine what you feel? How about your feeling watching the reality that make us
annoyed about it? Do you will the people who has made our society misery, they get penalty that
can be called VIP punishment.

Ladies and gentlemen.

Relating to this, it is better to give death penalty for the corruptor rather than sentence in jail for
some years or long life.

Please well imagine with your logical thought, if the corruptor get only sentence in jail or maybe
long life, does it make our country lose, and it does not give advantage for us and our country?

Why I can say that ladies and gentlemen?

For example: if the corruptor is just in jail it of course our government will give meals for them.
They do not give our government advantage but make our government lose.

Ladies and gentlemen.

As we all know that our country and government has afforded to eliminate corruptor in our
country, like government has formed a board such as Commission of Corruption Eradication
(KPK), even in all constitution had been contented about banning to perpetrate corruption. But
what had happened in our surroundings? There are still many corruptors. They did not feel afraid
of it.

If our government just relax and give penalty in jail for the corruptor how about our country in
the future and for the next generation?

There will be corruptors everywhere, in the villages up to the big citiesladies and gentlemen.

To avoid the worst thing that will happen, our government must give a firm penalty that is death
penalty for the corruptor.

So, we stand in this motion that corruptor must get death penalty.

Opposite: 1st speaker

Our time line is the corruptor has human right to live and government can use jail sentence.

Team split:

The first speaker …… speak about the human right for the corruptor to live, the second speaker
……..talk about the chance for corruptor to back go the right way, and the third speaker
………speak about the worst effect caused by death penalty.

Arguments:

I disagree with the motion because there are some reasons why I disagree about it! It can be
regarded from various kind of field.

1.Regarded from human right.

2.Regarded from psychology of corruptor family.

Ladies and gentlemen.

Here as the first speaker I will speak about human right. I think we all know what human right is.
Human right is right that adhere in everyone’s self since inside of womb that’s have a supreme
and fundamental as the gift of God for long life and it can’t be claimed by whoever and it must
be respected, be kept and must be protected by whoever social or state. From the statement above
it is really obvious that everybody, everyone has a human right especially life right including for
the corruptor. Corruptor is also an ordinary human. Like me, like you, and like us. So, corruptor
has human right to life as well, why corruptor should get a death penalty ladies and gentlemen?

Based on constitution of 1945 article 28 a about life right. It is really obvious that it is contain
about human right.

So, relating to this if the death penalty really be done. Won’t it break human right? Where is the
real of our government to protect the society if the death penalty really be done?

Ladies and gentlemen.

We recognize that Indonesia is even the house of corruptors. Many corruptors in Indonesia
started by the most little levels up to highest levels. But, I think to give penalty our government
must not use a death penalty. Actually, the corruptors are mostly smart person and have an
outstanding education.

But, because of their intelligence is not be balanced by strong religion lesson. So that, finally
they are taken to do a corruption.
And if all of them get a death penalty what will happen to our country? Perhaps, citizen or
resident in Indonesia is only a stupid person as the rest?

If we wait the next generation it is not sure will be better than the corruptor right now.

Ladies and gentlemen.

Now, let’s see the reality! We all know that manycorruptors in Indonesia who has known or have
not yet. Maybe the corruptor in Indonesia has reached 50% of official in our country and all of
them get a case of corruption.

Please you imagine; if all of them get a death penalty. How about their family fate? Perhaps they
will be misery or maybe their family will be poor because they do not have a spinal column to
fulfill their needs. Will it increase the level of poverty in our country? They will cry all night
long who will take responsibilities to them? Our government? I think it is not possible right?

Ladies and gentlemen.

Like what I say in my previous statement that actually the corruptor mostly a smart people. If
death penalty really be done it will reduce the intelligence our government.

So, relating to this I think a death penalty is not really important. Instead of giving death penalty
it is better if our government improve things for development our country. And instead of their
behavior maybe, perhaps our government can give the corruptors a penalty as heavy as the lost
that is caused of them.

And it is not necessary get a death penalty.

So, here we are as the opposition we disagree with the motion. Thanks
Gov Team 2nd Speaker
Good morning ladies n gentle man Honorable to the judge, moderator, time keeper, my beloved
negative team and all of the audience. Let me introduce myself. My name is …… as 2nd speaker.
I will talking about the afford to prevent corruption by death penalty show you ladies n getleman
that this house the government of Republic Indonesia stand in this motion that corruptor must get
death penalty like what 1st speaker said to prove that curruptors deserve a death penalty.
Before I deliver my argument, I’d like to make some rebuttle for the 1st speaker of negative team.
Rebuttal:

Well, ladies and gentlemen. Here I am as the second speaker from government, I would like to
rebut some arguments from the opposition.

Considering the statements from opposition stating that corruptor should not get death penalty
because of human right issue. They said that the corruptor has right to life without anyone
insulting the basic right that they have. Is that true?

Those are not the reason on how to make deal with the corruptor. They totally make a mass
destruction in our life. Poverty that actually can be reduced by funding from the government but
the corruptor steals it. In fact, they smoothly kill people by taking the money and flee away
towards the reasons going abroad for injure treatment. The government then can’t arrest them or
even take them into the tribunal of law court.

Arguments:

Ladies and gentlemen.

We should understand clearly about the death penalty. This means that people will not do
corruption over and over because of afraid of death penalty. This is the prevention and not the
action for only murdering the corruptor with beheading sentence. People will not do that even
trying for once if they know that the result of robbing money from the country is death. If we do
not give death penalty so they think it does not matter stealing money because they will get fine
only for one and half year in the prison. After all, they can be free with much money that they get
it beforehand.

Another reason on why we should fine the corruptor with the death penalty. We can imagine that
if we are sick in very bad condition then the doctor will injure us with very intensive treatment.
And if somebody badly injured, so they will get in emergency treatment. It goes the same with
corruption, if we do not treat as emergency so it can cause deadly effect for those who are
infected with the virus called corruption.

So ladies and gentlemen.

The last statement is … if we really want to make a change and better life in our future. We
should do it particularly starting from managing ourselves into very good maintenance by
eradicating corruption. Thus, we stand firmly in this motion that the corruptor must get death
penalty. Thanks

OPPOSITE TEAM 2ND SPEAKER

Rebuttal:

Ladies and gentlemen happy audience.

Here is my rebuttal. Based on the arguments given by government, it does not have any
correlation between the death sentences with the fear of perpetrating corruption. Again, we said
it does not have any correlation at all. We should focus on the people who accused as the
corruptors and they get death penalty.That is the point of this debate actually. It seems the
government does not really understand with the motion.

Arguments:

I am sure you all know about mafia of law court.Alleged people will look for the way to escape
and manipulate the result of court. We arevery sorry, somehow we do not intend to put aside the
dignity of judiciary but some irresponsible people who abuse their power of legalized
government to do that.This clearly shows that the tribunal of law court is still likely to be unfair
for some cases.

Ladies and gentlemen.

We, therefore, stand against this motion because government has possibility to fine the corruptor
with prison sentence. It aims at giving the corruptor the chance to reconstruct their life into the
way of goodness. The way that they and their family can live happily without any feeling of
being ashamed and blamed by all people in the country. Thus it is the main purpose of fining the
corruptor with the jail sentence and not with the death penalty that criticized and cursed by
International Amnesty Commission demanding all nations to not use the death sentence.

Ladies and gentlemen.

The next argument that we should pay more is that there are many people blamed because of the
others’ crime. The bad people envy with the good people. So, they try to manipulate some cases
for the good that possibly cause them jailed into prison. We should understand that not all
government officials corrupt the money and put it into their own pocket. They do good job
without any tendency and honestly manage the financial administration in advance, but sadly,
they are cursedly slandered by their fellow perpetrating corruption. That is definitely because the
reason on how the bad tackling the good and succeed the good’s position.
That is why we should convince you all that this motion is clearly understood and tackling the
problem properly. We greatly against this motion ladies and gentlemen. Thanks
Gov Team 3rd Speaker
Assalamualaikum, Good morning/afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Honorable to the judge,
moderator, time keeper, opposition team, and all of the audience.
My name is ……… as the 3rd speaker of government team. As the 3rd speaker, I’ll support 1st and
2nd speakers’ arguments with talking about exclusive law and court for the corruptor.
Before I deliver my argument, let me rebuttle a few arguments from 1st and 2nd speakers from
opposition team
Rebuttal:

Ok, ladies and gentlemen. Regarding the arguments from the opposition, we will give the
rebuttal for eliminating the anxiety of being alleged as corruptor. We believe that Commission of
Corruption Eradication uses the available and undisputed evidence to prove someone as the
alleged corruptor deriving data and trustable witness. Because the fine is death penalty that is
considered as the heaviest sentence so the commission cannot take the decision recklessly. They
must have used the principle of non-error presumption ladies and gentlemen.

Points of arguments from the first and second speaker:

1.Regarding the law constitution, corruption can possibly get the death penalty because of the
mass misery for people.

2.Regarding the prevention for other corruption, death penalty can significantly prevent the vast
corruption officially.

Since we know that corruption cannot be stopped by common sentence for criminal only. That
should be an exclusive law for the corruptor because we already have special court for them.

Ladies and gentlemen.

Corruption has similar crime with the bomber. They kill many people consciously and they
deserve to get death penalty. It goes the same with corruptor. They steal the money from country
and it causes many people die because of the money that can help them was lose over the
corruptor ladies and gentlemen.

Corruption is a mass destruction of people and it causes great misery for the poor killing them
smoothly.

This case, we totally agree with the motion that the corruptor must get death penalty. Thank you
ladies and gentlemen.
OPPOSITE TIM 3RD SPEAKER
Rebuttal:

Ladies and gentlemen. The debate is going to the end and we are as the opposition, will give
rebuttal for the last speaker of government. Here we go. Let’s think critically with this motion
ladies and gentlemen! The case of corruption is criminal but it is the same with the others. You
know why? That because corruption is the case of morality. If we can lead to morality into the
goodness so it transforms people from the hell to the heaven. And the government should give
the chance for corruptor to do that. Death penalty cannot be used to do that but prison sentence
has the possibility to change corruptor realizing their mistake.

Point of arguments from the first and second speaker.

1.Regarding human right, corruptor should have chance to change their behavior become the
good people.

2.Regarding mafia of law court, alleged corruptor has possibility that someone is envy with them
and manipulates cases for them.

Ladies and gentlemen.

This motion is clearly understood that we should give chance for the corruptor to be the good
people.

However, if the sentence has been executed and the last was found that the alleged corruptor
does not perpetrate, how is the responsibility for the corruptor and the family. They lose forever
and no one can make them live again ladies and gentlemen.

Therefore, that can cause the revenge from the family. Who knows? They will do crime that is
worse than corruption ladies and gentlemen.

So, corruption is the matter of morality and we should change it step by step with prison
sentence.

We are as the opposition, firmly disagree with the motion.

Thank you

CONCLUSION
Corruption has already occurred for years and the amount of corruption cases in Indonesia has
been increasing day by day. This condition happens because there is no an audacious step to
fight against it. Without any serious attempt, corruption in Indonesia will definitely be rampant.
Therefore, the death penalty for corruptors should be applied in order to stop the growth of
corruptors in Indonesia and make people believe in the government.