Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SHANAWAR KHALID
COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Wah Cantt
Department of Management Sciences
shanawarkhalid@gmail.com
Intellectual Stimulation
Leadership
Research Objectives Delimitation
Human Capital Value
Individualized
The overall importance of the service sector to the Pakistani economy, This study was delimited to examining only one variables influence
Consideration
coupled with the rapid growth within the education industry “corporate leadership”
Contingent Reward and its effect on human capital. Role of further
specifically, were strong contributing factors in formulating the aims of variables, such as occupational commitment, job involvement, and
this study. A review of human capital literature reaffirmed the critical supervisor’s roles might also be capable to clarify this concept more but
Management-by-exception
importance of this area at higher educational institution in highly not included in this study.
competitive markets, with many authors emphasizing the need to better
understand the complex dynamics associated with their roles. Research Laissez-faire
Limitations of Leadership
the Study
work carried out in relation to “corporate leadership, and human capital
Benefits” are need to get more attention, this was one of the main This research has many limitations. First, measurement of the variables
reason of conducting this study. An empirical approach to investigate a of “corporate leadership styles, and human capital management” is all
range of issues related to human capital and teachers was developed based on perceptions and attitudes of participants of this study through a
with the following broad aims: questionnaire/survey. No peer evaluation, manager feedback, or actual
behaviors on those variables were analyzed. Thus, some possible
1. Identify the different corporate leadership styles delivered to teachers sources of error might exist in the data set. Second, all subjects in this
in Pakistani higher educational institutions. study worked for the higher educational settings. Therefore, the findings
2. Identify the attributes human capital through the corporate leadership cannot be generalized to other organizations. Finally, this study is
styles in Pakistani higher educational institutions. limited to describing, explaining, and predicting associations among
these variables. No cause and effect type of relationship among
In order to pursue these aims, following focal research questions were variables was sought. But a causal relationship between “corporate
developed and explored: leadership styles, and human capital management” in higher educational
setting may exist in the real world.
Research Questions
(20.8%) out of 192 were married and remaining 69.2% were unmarried
5 point likert scale Strongly agree
Intellectual Stimulation while among 192 eighty two (42.7%) were working in public
20 items
institutions/ universities and one hundred and ten (57.3%) were working
To Strongly disagree
Management-by-exception
Laissez-faire Leadership
Snell, 2002
Lepak and
9 items
The above table indicated that four (2.1 %) out of 192 responses were
strongly agreed from the Intellectual Stimulation, twenty eight
The above table indicated that eighty two (42.7 %) out of 192 responses (14.6%) were neutral, ninety six (50%) were strongly disagree, twenty
were disagree from the Inspirational Influence, eighteen (9.4%) were seven (14.1 %) were agreed while thirty seven (19.2%) out of total 192
neutral, eighty four (43.8%) were strongly disagree, seven (3.6 %) were respondents were disagreed
agreed while one (0.5%) out of total 192 respondents were strongly
agreed. Individualized Consideration
Frequency Percent
Inspirational Motivation strongly 90 46.9
Frequency Percent disagree
strongly disagree 83 43.2 disagree 45 23.4
disagree 10 5.2 neutral 22 11.5
neutral 9 4.7 agreed 31 16.1
agreed 30 15.6 strongly agreed 4 2.1
strongly agreed 60 31.3 Total 192 100.0
Total 192 100.0 Table No. 7 Individualized Consideration
The above table indicated that four (2.1 %) out of 192 responses were
strongly agreed from the Individual Consideration, twenty two
(11.1%) were neutral, ninety (46.9%) were strongly disagree, thirty
(16.1 %) were agreed while remaining forty five (23.4%) out of total
The above table indicated that sixty (31.3 %) out of 192 responses 192 respondents were disagreed.
were strongly agreed from the Inspirational Motivation, nine (4.7%)
were neutral, eighty three (43.2%) were strongly disagree, thirty (4.7
%) were agreed while remaining ten (5.2%) out of total 192
respondents were disagreed.
Contingent Reward Human Capital Value
Frequency Percent
strongly disagree 79 41.1 Frequency Percent
disagree 15 7.8 strongly disagree 33 17.2
neutral 3 1.6 disagree 36 18.8
agreed 8 4.2 neutral 59 30.7
strongly agreed 87 45.3 agreed 54 28.1
Total 192 100.0 strongly agreed 10 5.2
Table No: 8 Contingent Reward Total 192 100.0
Table No:11 Human Capital Value
The above table indicated that seventy nine (41.1%) out of 192
responses were strongly disagreed from the Contingent Reward,
fifteen (7.8%) were disagree, three (1.6) were neutral, eight (4.2 %)
were agreed while remaining eighty seven (45.3 %) out of total 192
respondents were strongly agreed.
Management-by-exception The above table indicated that ten (5.2%) out of 192 responses were
Frequency Percent strongly agreed from the Human Capital Value, fifty nine (8.3%) were
strongly disagree 12 6.3 neutral, thirty-three (8.3%) were strongly disagree, fifty four (28.1 %)
disagree 30 15.6 were agreed while remaining thirty-six (10.9%) out of total 192
neutral 56 29.2 respondents were disagreed.
agreed 74 38.5
strongly agreed 20 10.4 Scale Properties – Reliability and Validity
Total 192 100.0
Table No: 9 Management-by-exception Usually, reliability coefficients should be “at least .70 and the higher the
better” (Fraenkel & Wallen, 1996, p. 163). Furthermore, as suggested
by Churchill (1979), if a scale item were to exhibit an item-to-total
The above table indicated that twenty (10.4 %) out of 192 responses correlation of .25 or less, that item should not be included in further
were strongly agreed from the Management-by-exception, fifty six analyses. The reliability coefficients were all higher than 0.70.
(29.2%) were neutral, twelve (6.3%) were strongly disagree, seventy Therefore, reliability tests showed that the internal consistency of each
four (38.5 %) were agreed while remaining thirty (15.6%) out of total variable was very good. Cronbach’s alphas were calculated to examine
192 respondents were disagreed. the reliability of each variable of the study. Cronbach’s alpha for used
scale was .759.
Laissez-faire Leadership
Frequency Percent Regression Analysis
strongly disagree 7 3.6
disagree 17 8.9 Model Summary
neutral 29 15.1 Model R Adjusted R Std. Error of the
agreed 74 38.5 R Square Square Estimate
strongly agreed 65 33.9 1 .501a .251 .222 1.02469
Total 192 100.0 a. Predictors: (Constant), AL.L, AII, AME, ACR, AIS, AIC,
Table No: 10 Laissez-faire Leadership AIM
Table No: 12 Model Summary
The above table indicated that sixty five (33.9 %) out of 192 responses
were strongly agreed from the Laissez-faire Leadership, twenty nine In the first column R is the value of multiple correlation coefficient
(15.1%) were neutral, seven (3.6%) were strongly disagree, seventy between the predictor and the outcome. When “transactional and
four (38.5%) were agreed while remaining seventeen (8.9%) out of transformational leadership” is used as a predictor, the value of R is
total 192 respondents were disagreed. .501. The next column is R square, which measured the variability in
the result is accounted for by the predictor for Model-1, the value is
.251, which means that “transactional and transformational
leadership” accounts for 25.1% of the variation in human capital
value. The adjusted R square gives an idea how well the model
generalizes, the value of adjusted R square is very close to the value
of R square, and the difference of Model-1 is (.251-.222=.029 or .2%).
Model summary table shows that there is 25.1% impact of
“transactional and transformational leadership” on human capital
value of the people teaching in academic intuitions of Pakistan.
“transactional and transformational leadership” rather than the negative
relationship as proposed at the beginning of the study. It is good news
ANOVAb for the organization since employees can still provide “transactional and
Model Sum of transformational leadership” when they remain in the organization
Squares df Mean Square F Sig. whether because there are no other job options or because of the high
1 Regression 64.718 7 9.245 8.805 .000a cost of leaving the job. In order to explain the result correctly and
Residual 193.198 184 1.050 clearly, HR managers need more information on what affects
Total 257.917 191 “transactional and transformational leadership” and combine other
a. Predictors: (Constant), AL.L, AII, AME, ACR, AIS, AIC, AIM findings from the present study. HR managers may want to collect
b. Dependent Variable: AHC information through informal talks with employees in order to make
Table No: 13 ANOVA reasonable judgments before taking any HR action.
The last column illustrates the goodness of fit of the model. The lower Conclusion
the number, the better is the fit. Typically if “Sig” is less than 0.05, we
conclude that our model best fit the data. The table reports the This study extended the concepts of the learning culture beyond the
ANOVA result for the four models, they are all significant. The borders of the United States to suggest that it is not a “Western”
ANOVA table shows that “transactional and transformational experience. It can also apply to the “Eastern” setting like in Pakistan.
leadership” predict the best fit with human capital value. This research work put correlated variables together based on preceding
researches and originates “transactional and transformational
Coefficients a leadership” can elaborate more of the variance in “human capital value”
Model Unstandardized Standardized comparative to other probable aspects. Learning in organizations is
Coefficients Coefficients considerable in workplace of today environment (e.g., Pakistan) where
B Std. Error Beta t Sig. people repeatedly shift their jobs. Findings in this research work
1 (Constant) 1.925 .362 5.320 .000 showed that it is valuable to provide in building up a grooming culture
AII .109 .164 .076 .667 .505 because of its potentially good connection with peoples’ “human capital
value”.
AIM -.183 .082 -.281 -2.239 .026
AIS .057 .094 .058 .604 .547
Recently, authors have concentrated more to “transactional and
AIC .340 .108 .349 3.147 .002 transformational leadership” due to its effect on the organization’s
ACR -.161 .066 -.263 -2.442 .016 growth and profits. Organizations also are required to find out in terms
AME .310 .076 .282 4.095 .000 of the human capital value and its management system, then with
AL.L -.020 .072 -.018 -.275 .783 appropriate instruments, such as a tool for measuring “human capital
a. Dependent Variable: AHC value. Therefore, higher educational institutions in both Eastern and
Table No: 14 Coefficients Western countries are able to be utilized the techniques revealed in the
research work and results offered in this study to design strategic tactics
Coefficients reveal the magnitude and direction of relationship between for improving “human capital value”.
dependent variable and independent variable. The above table shows
that in Model-1 there is positive relationship (t = 5.320, p< .01) of
“transactional and transformational leadership with human capital
value.
Discussion