Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Lo, Jomari
Pasaoa, Cyrus
Solis, Jamila
This study aims to know how the staffs in Children International operates the financial
and material donations from sponsors.
A. In what way/s does the Children International shows their educational and
financial support to the fostered children ?
B. How does it affect the fostered childrens life?
2. What are the benefits given to the fostered children when it comes to:
A. Financial
B. Material
C. Health
3. Does the workers of Children International gets welfare benefit from t he
donation?
Review of Related Literature
-Journal
-Journal
Ruby Payne (2005) is seen as one of the leading experts on poverty and
education in the United States, with her professional development having been adopted
in 38 states as of 2008 (Boomer, Dworin, May, & Semingson, 2008). The focus of her
literature and professional development enables teachers and schools to understand
children of poverty, while also equipping teachers with ideas to help these children
succeed. Payne defines poverty as “the extent to which an individual does without
resources” (2005, p. 7) and suggests that resources include financial, emotional, mental,
spiritual, physical, support systems, relationships/role models, and knowledge of hidden
rules.
Payne (2005) bases much of her research on a concept of “culture of poverty” (as cited
in Payne, p. 140). The term culture of poverty was first coined by Oscar Lewis (1971;
1961; 1959) who claimed there are universal characteristics of poverty that can be
identified throughout the world. Lewis (1971) suggests people of poverty share similarities
in “family structure, interpersonal relations, time orientations, value systems, spending
patterns, and the sense of community” (p. 137). “Poverty occurs in all races and in all
countries” (Payne, 2005, p. 2), and the universal characteristics of people in poverty are
found in “hidden rules” relating to possessions, money, personality, social emphasis,
food, clothing, time, education, destiny, language, family structure, worldview, love,
driving forces, and humor (p. 42). Payne says that those who grow up in a culture of
poverty view each of these rules differently than someone from the middle or wealthy
classes.
Eric Jensen (2009) approaches educating the poor from a brain-research perspective
discussing the ill effects of poverty on children’s cognitive ability to succeed. According to
Jensen, poverty can be categorized into six types: situational, generational, absolute,
relative, urban, and rural. His research emphasizes four principal risk factors challenging
families living in poverty: “emotional and social challenges, acute and chronic stressors,
cognitive lags, and health and safety issues” (p. 7). Jensen suggests educators can help
students from poverty-stricken families by (1) deepening staff understanding of the effects
of poverty on students’ health, emotions, and cognition, and (2) moving from “pity to
empathy” (p. 12).
In their book, When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty without Hurting the Poor . . .
and Yourself, Corbett and Fikkert (2012) suggest people’s understanding of poverty is
flawed because they typically think of poverty as financial. Based on previous research
by Myers (1999), Corbett and Fikkert (2012) describe poverty as being deficient in one or
more of the following categories: Povertyof Being (self-esteem); Poverty of Community
(relationships); Poverty of Stewardship (sense of purpose, view of work and/or
materialism) and Poverty of Spiritual Intimacy (p. 58). Furthermore, poverty can be
labeled as crisis (needing immediate and temporary assistance), short-term (needing
rehabilitation to work with individuals to move out of poverty), and long-term (needing
development with people to change the circumstances). One commonality they find in
people of poverty is the inability to change one’s situation. Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen
states, “It is the lack of freedom to be able to make meaningful choices—to have an ability
to affect one’s situation—that is the distinguishing feature of poverty” (as cited in Corbett
& Fikkert, 2012, p. 67). “Poverty is the result of relationships that do not work, that are
unjust, that are not for life, that are not harmonious or enjoyable. Poverty is the absence
of shalom in all of its meanings” (as cited in Corbett & Fikkert, 2012, p. 59).
-journal
7 facts that galvanize UNICEF and partners to take action to end child poverty
(Garcia, 2015).
1.) Today 1 billion less people live on extreme poverty than 25 years ago
There are 736 million people living below the extreme poverty line in 2015 –
this is 1 in 10 people in the world. Many are kids. The latest estimates tell us that half of
those living in extreme poverty are children. It is still shocking that children bear the brunt
of global poverty. If we want to end poverty one day, we need to focus on them.
3.) In sub-Saharan Africa alone, 247 million children are deprived of their basic
rights
Child poverty is about more than just money – it’s multidimensional. For
children, poverty means being deprived in crucial aspects of their lives such as nutrition,
health, water, education or shelter. UNICEF estimates that 2 in 3 children across 30 sub-
Saharan countries suffer from two or more deprivations of their rights.
5.) In almost every country in the world, children are more likely to live in poverty
than adults
Whether using the extreme poverty line, or the Multidimensional Poverty Index,
data tells us children are more likely to live in poverty than other groups. Ending child
poverty is a challenge in many countries around the world and one of the world’s most
urgent tasks.
6.) Only half of all countries in the world have updated child poverty data
Data is the basis for ending child poverty. Our analysis tells us that only around
half of all countries have data on child poverty, and this is often infrequently produced
and reported. We now have a unique opportunity to change this as we start to monitor
the newly agreed SDGs.
-Journal
journal
-Journal
2. Enhancing the foundations for sustained economic growth. Australia is giving critical
support to national government implementation of public-private partnerships for priority
infrastructure projects. We are also helping the Philippines rehabilitate and maintain
provincial roads, linking people to markets, jobs and services.
3. Promoting better disaster preparedness and response. Disasters drive families into
poverty and cut national growth rates. Australia is working with the Philippines to respond
to humanitarian emergencies and helping government agencies and communities to
better prepare for and recover from natural disasters.
4. Improving conditions for peace and security. Australia’s national interest in regional
stability motivates aid investments in Mindanao that assist a credible and widely
supported peace agreement, increases institutional capacity to implement the agreement,
and improves local mechanisms for averting the escalation of violence.
Australia’s new Philippines Aid Investment Plan was launched in September 2015. The
plan recognises that Philippines is in a stronger economic position than before and shifts
the focus towards supporting the Philippine’s government to better manage its own
resources and catalysing reform. The new goal of our aid investments in the Philippines
will be to ‘accelerate inclusive economic growth and political stability’. Three objectives
support this goal: enhancing the foundations for economic growth; building stronger
institutions for transparent and accountable governance; and improving conditions for
peace and stability.
-Journal
-Journal
Aid Effectiveness
According to Save the Children (2012), U.S. engagement with developing countries
can help to create a safer and more prosperous world where poverty is reduced,
opportunities for growth are created, and human dignity becomes a reality. However, to
live up to it most transformative potential, the current system for U.S. global
development must be fundamentally reformed. U.S. development strategic objectives
and engagement should:
-journal
Foreign Aid
The vast majority of foreign aid has failed to alleviate poverty. It has improved the
lot of poor people in a few cases. The people of Martinique, for example, are probably
better off because the French government provides a very high percentage of their gross
domestic product. Also, foreign aid helped wipe out river blindness in West Africa, keeping
eighteen million children safe from infection .2 But a statistical study found that foreign
aid “appears to redistribute from the reasonably well-off in the West to most income
groups in the Third World except the very poorest” (Mosley 1987, p. 23). This is consistent
with the evidence from both poor and rich countries that the middle classes tend to
capture government transfers (see redistribution). By contrast, private transfers through
either traditional interfamily channels or private charities (nongovernmental organizations,
or NGOs) are more efficient in targeting these transfers to the poor, as well as in delivering
health care and education (Lal and Myint 1996). The centralized bureaucracies of the
Western aid agencies are particularly inept in targeting these transfers to the truly needy
because they lack local knowledge. Moreover, there is evidence that these inefficient
public transfers tend to crowd out more efficient private transfers (Lal and Myint 1996).
Not surprisingly, therefore, despite their claim that their mission is to alleviate Third World
poverty, official aid agencies are increasingly subcontracting this role to the NGOs.
Whether this official embrace of the NGOs is in the NGOs’ long-term interest is arguable
(Lal 1996).
-Book
Human rights advocacy in the west is changing. New issues are being promoted, which
extend beyond relatively narrow range of civil and political rights that nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) historically fought for. Since the early 1990s, therw has been a
growing movement among NGOs, social justice organization. UN agencies, and some
state institutions in favor of using human rights rhetoric and strategies to combat extreme
poverty. Hundreds of NGOs are now involved in promoting the realization of economic
and social rights in some fashion. Yet even as they move to adopt a human rights
approach to poverty, NGOs understand and approach human rights framework in
different ways. NGOs are promoting subsistence rights by increasingly adopting rights-
based approaches in guiding the implementation of their project work among the poor.
Although all of these organizations approach subsistence rights from different angles in
different contexts, their work on subsistence rights is concerned with a similar goal:
guaranteeing everyone the basic means for sustaining a minimum livelihood (Chong,
2010).
-Book
Roles of NGO
NGO, or nongovernment organization, is used here in its common colloquial sense to
refer to nonprofit private organizations working in the area of “development” –
organizations with a social mission. Carrie Meyer defines NGOs as “independent
organizations that receive outside funding to support either staff, programs, or both,” and
are “engaged in activities related to sustainable development” (1992, 2). This book
focuses on these kinds of funded social-development organizations often play key social
development roles in the lives of poor people. The World Bank for its part, has the
objective of reducing poverty. It centers a great part of its actions around the concept of
social capital with society’s organization being part of the manifestation of this. The World
Bank considers that NGO’s participation improves projects’ abilities to reach the most
disadvantaged groups and gives greater flexibility and transparency to project
implementation. As a mechanism for citizen participation, the World Bank incorporates
the perspective of alliances, promoting interrelationships aiming the three sectors: public,
private, and civil society.
-Book
The rise of NGOs is not an accident. While it reflects private initiative and voluntary action,
it also follows an increase inpopularity of NGOs with governments and official aid
agencies and the willingness of donors to make funds available to them. As NGOs are
expanding, many of them have switched from being primarily funded by private donors to
being assentially funded by institutional donors. Official agencies support NGOs in
providing welfare services because of their assumed cost-effectiveness in reaching the
poorest (Meyer, 1995). NGOs are also seen as representative of the poor and most
vulnerable. The relationship with the "people" is seen as giving them greater public
legitimacy than some governments, while their manegerial features are seen as
permitting private sector levels of cost-control and efficiency.
-Book
World Poverty
-Book
Poverty is the result of economic, political, and social processes that interact with each
other and frequently reinforce each other in ways that exacerbate the deprivation in which
poor people live. (World Bank 200. 1). A main NGO strength has long been seen as their
local focus: capacity to reach the rural and remote poor, to promote community
participation and local control of programs (Cernea 1988, 17). NGOs’ original mission
was, according to Anthony Bebbington, to challenge the “dominant exclusionary, top-
down, and often repressive forms of development” prevalent in the sixties and seventies
(Bebeington 1997, 117). Key was NGOs’ emphasis on the grassroots. In the mid-1970s,
the Washington, D.C.-based IAF highlighted the relative novelty of the thought the local
“grassroots” people would know how to solve their own problems.
NGOs that work to help poor communities create their own change would recognize
themselves in the role of “community development facilitators perform the following roles:
-Book
Fowler (1990) said that the way NGO design their organizations it is often claimed that
NGOs have a comparative advantage over the government sector in doing certain types
of work. As Fowler (1990) writes, ‘NGOs and their supporters share the view that, in
comparison with governments they are better able to….’ He then lists 16 such
advantages. Advocates of this position believe that these comparative advantages derive
from features such as: the way NGOs design their organisations; a stronger moral
commitment to helping the poor; greater professionalism; a closer and more participatory
working relationship with poor people; and an ability to innovate. NGOs are autonomous
institutions inspired by a particular vision of the society they wish to see develop, pursuing
their defined mission in that regard (Tendon 1991).
-book
The MDGs acknowledge the survival, and the incidence of democratic freedoms--such
as the rights of the poor to form organizations and speak out for their own betterment--
have greatly increased. These improvements are due in no small measure to various
forms of aid, including aid impact, we should not just look at growth, but also at key social
indicators that tell us whether growth is sustainable, and whether solid growth may be
expected in the future.
Moreover, foreign aid has rarely been primarily about poverty reduction. Most foreign aid
is actually spent on U.S. companies and consultants, along with U.S. government
officials. When aid is to be used for needed import of goods and services, the aid is often
"tied," requiring the recipient to buy the product from whatever country is donating the aid,
regardless of cost. Much goes to middle-income countries. And much has gone to serve
a geopolitical agenda, such as supporting allies in the Cold War and the Middle East
conflicts (Smith, 2015).
-book
According to Bamberger (1996), although there are many variations, the NGO sector in
many Asian countries has passed though a number of stages characterized by different
emphases:
-book
NGOs
-book
Vulnerability to Poverty
Vulnerability to poverty also affects the accumulation of assets. The lack of credit access can be
mitigated by accumulating assets over time because the poor can sell assets at good time to smooth
consumption over time (Carter and Zimmerman 2000). On the other hand, when the poor face a
survival constraint, they may respond to negative shocks by adjusting consumption to defend or
smooth their asset value to ensure their survival (Zimmerman and Carter 2003). Therefore, it may be
useful to look at asset holdings to assess the vulnerability of households.
References:
https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/ForeignAid.html