Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
Many curriculum planners, administrators, researchers, and classroom teachers at all
level of education have used Bloom’s taxonomy. Bloom’s taxonomy is a multi-tiered
model of classifying thinking according to six cognitive level of complexity. Bloom’s
taxonomy has stood the test of the time. Due to its long history and popularity, it has been
condensed, expanded, and interpreted in a variety of ways. Research findings have led to
the discovery of a veritable smorgasbord of interpretations and applications falling on
continuum ranging from tight overviews to expanded explanations. Nonetheless, one recent
revision merits particular attention. To know both version of cognitive taxonomy of bloom
help us to make a better plan to have a successful problem solving because they involve the
feelings and beliefs of the students and teachers as well as the social and cultural
environment of the classroom.
INTRODUCTION
Bloom’s taxonomy is a topic that education people keep talking about. His
attention to the development of specifications through which educational objectives could
be organized according their cognitive complexity. If such an organization or hierarchy
could be developed, university examiners might have a more reliable procedure for
assessing students and the outcomes of educational practice. Bloom and his coworkers
created the classic definition of the levels of educational activity, from the very simple (like
memorizing facts) to the more complex (such as analyzing or evaluating information).
Their intent was to develop a method of classification for thinking behaviors that
were believed to be important in the processes of learning. Eventually, this framework
became taxonomy of three domains: (www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/bloo.htm)
• The cognitive – knowledge based domain that consists of six levels
• The affective – attitudinal based domain that consists of five levels
• The Psychomotor – skills based domain that consists of six level
What resulted from his work is Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, the
cognitive domain was published in 1956 (Eisner 2000). Because many curriculum
planners, administrators, researchers and educators, it is better if we know better about the
Bloom’s taxonomy.
DISCUSSION
The cognitive taxonomy is predicated on the idea that cognitive operations can be
ordered into six increasingly complex levels. What is taxonomic about the taxonomy is
that each subsequent level depends upon the students’ ability to perform at the level or
levels that precede it. The taxonomy was no mere classification scheme. It was an effort to
hierarchically order cognitive processes. The bloom taxonomy has been revised to correct
some of the problems in it.
Evaluation Creating
Synthesis Evaluating
Analysis Analyzing
Application Applying
Comprehension Understanding
Knowledge Remembering
OLD VERSION NEW VERSION
CONCLUSION
Like any theoretical model, Bloom’s taxonomy has its strength and weakness. Its
great strength is that it has taken the very important topic of thinking and placed a structure
around it that is usable by practitioners. Those teachers who keep a list of question prompts
relating to the various level of Bloom’s Taxonomy undoubtedly do a better job of
encouraging higher-order thinking in their students than those who have no such tools. On
the other hand, as anyone who has worked with a group of educators to classify a group of
questions and learning activities according to the Taxonomy can attest, there is little
consensus about what seemingly self –evident terms like “analysis,’ or “evaluate” mean.
But we don’t have to worry about the using the Bloom’s taxonomy and its revision because
both of them are giving the students with the knowledge and cognitive process they need
for successful problem solving.
REFERENCES
www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/bloom.htm
www.nerds.unl.edu/pages/preser/sec/articles/bloom.html
www.coun.uvic.ca/learning/exams/blooms-taxonomy.html
Teaching and e