Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT: Cross-Laminated Timber is an engineered wood product with high rigidity and dimensional stability. It
is because of these properties that it has the potential to resist the impact loads that are part of the hazard associated with
flying debris in both tornadoes and hurricanes. According to debris impact testing standards, a 15-pound 2x4 is used to
represent the debris consistent with these events. These standards attempt to determine the response of wall and roof
assemblies to debris impact hazards that occur at various locations. For each of the experimental tests, a numerical
model was created in ABAQUS for future extrapolation of debris impact resistance. Through both experimental and
numerical testing, the resistance to debris impact loads of Cross-Laminated Timber could be determined for a range of
hazard levels in terms of debris speed, impact momentum, and kinetic energy. This paper describes both the
experimental tests that served to test a variety of impact locations and missile speeds as well as the numerical models
that were compared to the experimental tests. It also points to the potential applications of this information and outlines
the method for determining the debris impact resistance for other materials.
1 INTRODUCTION 123 the setup of the experimental tests. The three main
impact locations required by these documents are the
As the markets for Cross-Laminated Timber in the panel center, the edge of the panel within 6 inches of the
United States grow, it becomes worthwhile to examine support, and in the corner within 6 inches of the support
the capabilities this new building material has to resist and top of the panel. These tests are meant to determine
the loads associated with hazards present in the region. the response of wall assemblies to impact in the point of
It has long been known that both hurricanes and highest stiffness near the support and the area of lowest
tornadoes produce debris that can cause significant stiffness near the center of the panel. There are three
damage to the building envelope. This damage is defined failure criteria in both FEMA P-361 and ICC
significant not only because it causes a direct danger to 500. The first describes a permanent panel deflection of
the occupants, but also because it leads to an increase in greater than 3 inches as measured from the inside of the
the wind-induced pressures as the structure develops wall assembly. The second defines the failure by the
internal pressure. Debris impact hazards are highly fracture of material on the inside of the wall assembly
variable and difficult to simulate due to a lack of that is sufficient to pierce 70# kraft paper mounted
statistical data, but are a leading contributor to building behind the panel. The final failure mechanism describes
envelope breaches according to extensive studies by the penetration of the missile through the wall assembly.
Minor [1]. Currently, testing standards for both In the case of CLT, its ability to resist the impact loads
hurricane and tornado hazards require testing against associated has not been extensively studied. Some
debris impacts are represented by a 2x4. The 2x4 is testing has been performed at the US Forest Products
meant to represent either a wall stud or roof truss Laboratory involving 3-ply and 4-ply CLT [6]. The
member from an adjacent structure. The testing of wall process for determining the response of CLT to debris
and roof assemblies against impact loads is referenced impact loading consisted of both experimental testing
for safe rooms and storm shelters in FEMA P-361 [2] and numerical simulation. Early experimental tests were
and ICC 500 [3]. These tests require a 15-pound 2x4 performed with missile velocities less than 100 mph to
with a velocity of 100 mph and reference ASTM E1886 collect information about the displacement and force
[4] and ASTM E1996 [5] for additional details regarding time histories of the panels. Subsequent tests were
performed at higher velocities to determine the failure
1 Michael Stoner, Ph.D. Student, Clemson University, USA, threshold of the CLT panels. Selected experimental tests
mwstone@g.clemson.edu at lower velocities were used to compare the finite
2 Weichiang Pang, Associate Professor Clemson University,
element models created in ABAQUS [7] to
USA, wpang@clemson.edu
experimentally collected displacement time histories.
The purpose of these numerical models was to study the The results of the 100 mph tests showed vulnerabilities
performance and behaviour of 3-ply CLT under impact of CLT to resist impact loads. For each of the three
loading. With an understanding about the performance impact locations, significant indentation occurred, and in
of CLT in debris impact events, it could be used as a the edge and corner tests, full penetration of the missile
structural material in safe rooms and storm shelters as occurred. An example of this damage is shown in
well as a debris impact resistant building envelope for Figure 3. With a span of only 4 feet, the energy that can
residential structures. be absorbed by the panel is significantly less than panels
with a span of 8 feet or 9 feet (typical story height in a
2 EXPERIMENTAL TESTING PLAN building). It is for this reason that more realistically sized
CLT panels were used for subsequent impact testing.
2.1 PRELIMINARY IMPACT TESTING
Several small-scale CLT panels were manufactured and
subjected to impact testing at Clemson University.
These panels were pressed using a 4-foot by 4-foot
Newman press. These panels were constructed using
No. 2 Southern Yellow Pine 2x6 lumber and were tested
with missiles having velocities of 80 mph and 100 mph
Each panel was tested with impacts at the panel center,
edge, and corner. The results of the 80 mph tests
showed the ability to capture displacement time history
data using Celesco SM2-7 string pots and force time
history data using Dytran 1210-V2 20,000-pound
Figure 3: Punching Failure with Debris Impact Testing
capacity piezoelectric load cells. An example of the
displacement time history captured during these tests is
2.2 EXPERIMENTAL TEST PANELS AND
shown in Figure 1. The point measured by the string pot
FRAME AND SENSOR LAYOUT
located 1 foot to the right of the panel’s center with the
missile impact location at the panel’s center. An In order to represent spans that are more realistic a series
example of the force time history captured by these tests of 8-foot by 8-foot panels were ordered from a
is shown in Figure 2. This load cell was located in the commercial CLT manufacturer. These panels were
top right corner of the CLT wall panel. made from Spruce, Pine, Fir – South (SPF-S). For
testing, the CLT panels were loaded into a steel frame
shown in Figure 4. The steel frame was constructed of
2 W6 wide-flanged steel shapes. The test panels were
attached to supporting perpendicular strips of CLT using
Displacement [in]
Figure 2: Force Time History of Debris Impact of One Figure 4: Experimental Testing Frame Used to Support
Load Cell for 60 mph Test Wall Assemblies
3 EXPERIMENTAL TESTING RESULTS
A 3.1 DEBRIS IMPACT TESTING AT 60 MPH
The debris impact testing of full-size CLT panels were
initially performed with missile speeds of 60 mph.
These tests served to capture information on the near
elastic response of the panels where punch through
failure was not expected. The purpose of these impact
tests was to collect the displacement and force time
history for which the elastic parameters of the numerical
model could be calibrated. In addition, the behaviour of
B C these tests could be compared to the elastic plate
equations developed for orthotropic materials with
similar boundary conditions.
The three impact locations, center, edge, and corner,
were tested on the same 8-foot by 8-foot specimen of
SPF-S CLT. The summary of the permanent damage
caused by these tests is shown in Table 1. As expected,
each of these tests pass the failure criteria as defined by
FEMA P-361 and ICC 500.
A B C
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT