Detailed Lesson Plan

DLP No. Learning Areas Level Quarter Duration

July 9, 2019 Introduction to the Grade 11 –Lev 1st Quarter 1 hour and 20
2:20-3:40pm Philosophy of Vygotsky minutes
Human Person
Learning PPT11/12-Ie-2.4
Competency/ies At the end of the session, learners are expected to evaluate opinions
Key Concepts / An argument is a conclusion based upon evidence (i.e. premises). Arguments are commonly
Understanding found in newspaper editorials and opinion columns, as well as magazine essays. To evaluate
Developed these arguments, you must judge whether it is good or bad. "Good" and "bad" are not,
however, merely subjective opinions. An evaluation should be based upon rational criteria,
such as the F.E.L.T. criteria below.
1. Objectives
KNOWLEDGE Explain the criteria of evaluating argument
SKILLS Evaluate author’s argument
ATTITUDE Share realization in following guidelines of arguments
VALUES MAKATAO: Open-mindedness, teamwork
2. CONTENT

3. LEARNING PowerPoint Presentation, a rant post in Facebook, extrajudicial video in the Philippines
RESOURCES Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person by Roberto D. Abella
/MATERIALS

4. PROCEDURES
4.1 Introductory Let the assigned group facilitate the recapitulation of the previous lesson in a form of
Activity Picture Clues. (Let them realize that the elderly are people who have time-tested wisdom).

4.2 Activity / Strategy Let selected students perform a skit on the following scenarios:
1. a mother leaving the house for work gives instructions to the eldest child on how to
manage the household chores
2. a class adviser who will take a maternity leave instructs her advisory class to behave at all
times
4.3 Analysis Processing Activity:
Let the students answer the following questions in their respective group:
1. What instructions were given in the first scenario? In the second scenario?
2. How an important following instruction is in terms of doing or accomplishing a task?
*Guide the students in realizing the benefit of having and following guidelines in reading
and examining arguments.

4.4 Abstraction
Criteria for
Evaluating an
Argument

Fairness
Evidence
Logic
Tone

• Fairness
• Evidence
• Logic
• Tone

Fairness- Is the argument fair and balanced, or does it contain bias? Is the argument overly
emotional and filled with loaded language?
 Is the argument one-sided? Are there alternative points of view not addressed?
Evidence- Are the given premises reliable and relevant?
Logic- Are the arguments thoroughly explained? Do they contain gaps in reasoning or logical
fallacies?
Tone- Is the attitude of the writer appropriate for the content?

The teacher will present to the class, a rant post in Facebook. The students will evaluate the
argument on the said context.
4.5 Application Ask the students:
Why is evaluating an opinion significant in your daily dealings with your
a. classmates/friends?
b. teachers?
c. siblings?
d. parents?
e. community?
4.6 Assessment Text Analysis in a short bondpaper
The teacher will let the students watch a video about extrajudicial killing; the learner will
evaluate the perspective of the author in a short bondpaper.

4.7 Assignment
4.8 Wrap –Up/
Concluding Activity
5. Remarks
6. Reflection

Attachment:

PowerPoint Presentation

Prepared by :

School: Don Gerardo Ll. Ouano Memorial National High School

Name : Florevil S. Basay
Position/ Designation: SST-I Division: Mandaue
Contact Number: 09086952576 Email. Address : florevilb16@gmail.com

Prepared by: Checked by:

FLOREVIL S. BASAY DINDO T. ALILIN

Special Science Teacher I Master Teacher I