7/25/2019 CentralBooks:Reader

Close Reader

SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 007

Information | Reference and sound practice demand that, at the

risk of occasional errors, judgments of Copy Selection
Case Title: courts should become final and irrevocable Select some text within a
ESPERIDION TOLENTINO,
plaintiff-appellant, vs. ADELA
at some definite date fixed by law.1 Interes paragraph and click here to
copy the selected text. Citation
ONGSIAKO, ET AL., defendants- rei publicae ut finis sit litium. included.
appellees. The order of dismissal appealed from is
Citation: 7 SCRA 1001 affirmed. Costs against the appellant.
More...  

Bengzon, C.J., Bautista Angelo,

Search Result Labrador, Concepcion, Barrera, Paredes,
Regala and Makalintal, JJ., concur.
Padilla and Dizon, JJ., did not take
part.

Order affirmed.

Note.—After an appealable judgment

or order has become final, it can no longer
be altered and it is of public

_______________

1  Peñalosa vs. Tuason, 22 Phil. 303; Dy Cay vs.

Crossfield, 28 Phil. 251; Layda vs. Legaspi, 39 Phil.
83; Aquino vs. Dir. of Lands, 39 Phil. 850; National
Bank vs. Barreto, 52 Phil. 818; People vs. Macadaeg,
L-4316, 28 May 1952.

1004

1004 SUPREME COURT REPORTS

ANNOTATED
Tolentino vs. Ongsiako

interest that it be so because otherwise

there would be no way of knowing when
litigants can exercise their rights
recognized by the judgments or orders
rendered in their favor nor when the
action in which they are involved could be
considered terminated (Hubahib v.
Insular Drug Co., 64 Phil. 119).

_______________

© Copyright 2019 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.

© Copyright 2019 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.

www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016c24b5e7fe5311b34f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/1