Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
When an emotional problem or mental illness is men- tioned by the patient or parents, elicited by an interview, or
identified by a screening instrument, a thorough evalu- ation is indicated. At least 30 minutes should be scheduled,
and additional appointments may be necessary to gather information or perform tests to determine a mental health
diagnosis. Examples of more thorough questions and obser- vation are given in Table 7–2. Targeted assessment
screening tools are also useful in determining severity, comorbidity, and context of impairment.
It is useful to see both parents and the child first together, then the parents alone, and then the child alone (for
school- aged children and adolescents). This sequence enables the provider to observe interactions among family
members, allows the child to feel more comfortable with the provider, and offers the parents and the child an
opportunity to talk confidentially about their concerns. Parents and children often feel shame and guilt about some
personal inadequacy they perceive to be causing the problem. The provider can facilitate the assessment by
acknowledging that the family is trying to cope and that the ultimate task of assessment is to seek solutions and not
to assign blame. An attitude of non- judgmental inquiry can be communicated with supportive
189
ChAPter 7
4. Family history of mental health problems and treatment 7. 7. What is the child’s apparent cognitive level?
child?
provider)
statements such as, “Let’s see if we can figure out what might be happening here and find some ways to make things
better.”
• Do the parents have any opinions about the cause of the problem?
1. Interviewing the preschool child—Preschool children should be interviewed with their parents. As the parents
discuss their concerns, the provider can observe the child’s behavior, including their activity level and any unusual
behaviors or symptoms. It is helpful to have toy human
190
figures, animals, or puppets, and crayons and paper available that the child can use to express him- or herself. After
hear- ing the history from the parents and observing and talking with the child, the provider can begin to develop an
impres- sion about the problem and formulate a treatment plan to discuss with the family.
2. Interviewing the school-aged child—Most school- aged children have mastered separation anxiety sufficiently to
tolerate at least a brief interview alone with the provider. In addition, they may have important information to share
about their own worries. The child should be told beforehand by the parents or provider (or both) that the doctor
will want to talk to the child about his or her feelings. School-aged children understand and even appreciate parental
concern about unhappiness, worries, and difficulty in getting along with people. At the outset, it is useful to explore
the child’s thoughts about certain issues raised by the parents and ask whether the child thinks that a problem exists
(eg, unhappi- ness, anxiety, or sleep disturbance) and any other concerns the child may have. The provider should ask
the child to describe the problem in his or her own words and ask what he or she thinks is causing the problem. It is
important to ask the child how the problem affects the child and the family. At the end of the interview with the child,
it is important to share or reiterate the central points derived from the inter- view and to state that the next step is to
talk with the parents about ways to make things better for the child. At that time, it is good to discuss any concerns or
misgivings the child might have about sharing information with parents so that the child’s right to privacy is not
arbitrarily violated. Most children want to make things better and thus will allow the provider to share appropriate
concerns with the parents.
3. Interviewing the adolescent—The provider usually begins by meeting briefly with the parents and adolescent
together to define the concerns. Because the central devel- opmental task of adolescence is to create an identity
separate from that of the parents, the provider must show respect for the teen’s point of view. The provider should
then meet alone with the adolescent or, at least, give the teen the option. After the provider has interviewed the
adolescent and talked further with the parents, he or she should formu- late thoughts and recommendations.
Whenever possible, it is helpful to discuss these with the adolescent before present- ing them to the parents and teen
together. The issue of con- fidentiality must be discussed early in the interview: “What we talk about today is
between you and me unless we decide together that someone should know or unless it appears to me that you might
be in a potentially dangerous situation.”
The interview with the adolescent alone might start with a restatement of the parents’ concerns. The teen should be
encouraged to describe the situation in his or her own words and say what he or she would like to be different. The
provider should ask questions about the adolescent’s primary concerns,
predominant mood state, relationships with family members, level of satisfaction with school and peer relationships,
plans for the future, drug and alcohol use, and sexual activity.
In concluding the interview, the provider should sum- marize his or her thoughts and develop a plan with the
teenager to present to the parents. If teenagers participate in the solution, they are more likely to work with the
family to improve the situation. This should include a plan either for further investigation or for ways of dealing with
the problem and arranging subsequent appointments with the provider or an appropriate referral to a mental
healthcare provider.
As with broad screening tools, targeted screening tools or assessment instruments can be very valuable in the clinic
since they are standardized and allow for the assessment of current symptoms and severity. They can also be useful
for following or reassessing a patient’s progress after initiation of treatment.
1. Vanderbilt Ass