Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Management information
Turnover (in Crores INR) Name MD Mobile No. Email
(FY15-16)
MSIL Business SOB Name Plant Head Mobile No. Email
No. of Manufacturing plants in India
Total No. of Tier-2 vendors
Others Major Customer
Company Type (Legal Status)
Country of Origin
ISO/TS certification agency, type and next
certfication renewal date.
Plant Detail :
Total Number
Vendor Code Location / Address Major Part Types Supplied
of OE Parts
AVERAGE SALARY
WORKING DAYS / YEAR WORKING HOURS / DAY WEEKLY OFF DAY AVERAGE AGE OF WORKER CATEGORY EMPLOYEES (WORKERS)
Supplier Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
1. w Regarding
Production implementation rule of
preparation production preparation ①
Regarding management
2
/implementation by
production preparation ①
plan/report (master plan)
②
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Supplier Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
Product/process
4
evaluation at the quality
①
evaluation meeting in
each trial
2. Regulation for
Regulation for 1
initial production control
initial
production
control ①
2
Implementation of initial
①
production control
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Supplier Name
3. Definition and
Changing 1
implementation of
management changing management ①
Supplier Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
4. Procedure to make
Standards 1
process control
management standards(QA process ①
charts)
4. Procedure to control
Standards 2
standards
management
・Process control ①
standards
・Inspection
specifications
・Operation instructions
②
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
4. Procedure to control
Standards 2
standards
management
・Process control
standards
Supplier Name ・Inspection
specifications
・Operation instructions
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
5. Education/ training
Education and 1
procedure
training
①
Education for ①
2
managers/Inspectors/
Special operators
②
③
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Supplier Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
6.
Quality audit 1
Activity to keep/improve
and process production quality ①
verification
Content of process
2
review
①
②
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
7.
Supplier
control
Management, quality
2
Supplier Name evaluation and
instruction for suppliers
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
③
8.
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Handling
abnormality in
quality
Supplier Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
Prevention of recurrence
2
・Customer claims ①
・In process failure
・Suppliers failure
②
④
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Supplier Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
9. Location of production
5S 1
site
management ①
Production equipment's
2
management ①
10. Maintenance of
Equipment/Ins 1
equipment's , jigs and ①
pection tools
equipment's
management
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Supplier Name
10. Maintenance of
Part Name 1 equipment's , jigs and
Equipment/Ins
pection tools
Category
equipment's Audit Area Concerning regula
management
②
Maintenance of
2
inspection equipment's ①
11. Implementation of
Implementatio 1
standards
n of standards ①
④
Implementatio standards
n of standards
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Supplier Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
Non-confirming parts
2
management ①
Supplier Name
③
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees
Do you have Control plan (PCS) and MIS-P for all part numbers
prodcued for MSIL?
Do you have procedure for training & make Annual training Plan
based on TNI?
Do you conduct Training as per annual plan and keep training
records.
Do you review Control plan (PCS) and other standards after taking
countermeasures for defects.
Have you defined Proper location & volume (i.e bin height) using
visual control for RM, BOP, WIP , Finished goods
Have you defined the frequency for replacement and polishing for
consumables tools? (i.e Blades, electrodes, pins, rubstone etc.)
Do you maintain FIFO for RM, BOP, WIP and Finished parts etc.
Achieved Score 0
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :
Auditors:
Remarks Follow Up
Additional ch
Supplier Name:
Part Name:
HR Structure
IR Related issues
Wage Settlement
D/E ratio
PAT/Sales
Credit Rating
2
DSCR
(Debt Service Coverage Ratio (PBIT/Loan re-
payment including interest ))
Sales Turnover
S.No Category Check points
Scale
Organisation structure
Environment
Adequate
Manufacturing
capability
Facility
S.No Adequate
Category Check points
Manufacturing
capability
Facility
Inprocess Inspection
Adequate testing
Facility
Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)
if
D/E <1 then 2 Marks
1<D/E<2 then 1 Marks
D/E>2 then 0 Marks
if
PAT>5% then 2 Mark
2%<PAT<5% then 1 Mark
PAT<2% then 0 Mark
if
Cash / Net sales>8% then 2 Mark
5%<Cash / Net sales<8% then 1 Mark
Cash / Net sales <5% then 0 Mark
if
ROCE >= 10 then 2 Marks
5<ROCE<10 1 Marks
ROCE<5 0 Marks
Is Fire Safety Organization structure / fire volunteer list available within the
company with clear responsibility?(As per State Factory Rule)
Has the Fire Safety Risk assessment been carried out & mitigation of risk being
done?
(As per State Factory Rule)
Is Top Management committed towards Fire Prevention & Quick response and
addressing through regular communication & reviews (MIS)?
Is Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm/water sprinkler system provided for
office/building area & integrated with fire/emergency control room?
Is appropriate Fire detection and suppression system provided in fire prone area
like (server room, paint shop, paint & thinner store, gasoline storage, diesel & other
storage)
Is Fire Extinguishers operation trained persons/security team available in each
shift (24X7)?
(As per State Factory Rule)
a) Is enough number of Fire Hydrant Points available
b) Is Fire Pump house adequate & maintained in good condition (Condition of
Jockey Pump/DG availability for power failure) ?
c) Is Hydrant Water is charged at
7 Kg/Cm2 Pressure?
(As per National Building Code/State Factory Rule)
Is Onsite Emergency Plan available & responsible persons are fully aware about
their responsibility?
(State Factory Rule/ Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals
Rule)
Is the fire/security team familiar with the premises and any particular special
hazards relating to the premises or the activities within it?
As per safety assessment checksheet.
Does the vendor have awareness/ emphasis on Low cost automation , Pika Pika,
pickup sensor , operation interlocking etc.
Is vendor working 24 X 7 basis (except standard requirement like furnace for 24*7
and injection molding for 24*6 etc.)
Risk mitigation - Does the vendor have any backup plan available for
Manufacturing in case of exigency.
Does the supplier have all Testing Equipment's/Rigs required as per drawing
requirements
or
It is outsourced to accredited external agency/Collaborator
Does the supplier have all inspection instruments required as per drawing
requirements
or
It is Outsourced from accredited external agency/Collaborator support
Does the supplier have adequate testing facility for inprocess inspection as per
control plan
Online auto segregation of NG part is available or not after testing. i.e. Poka yoke
for NG part with counter or Interlocking of Pokayoke with next cycle.
Does the least count/ working range of Inprocess test facility is inline with
product requirement.
After Testing, does the judgement is subjective or objective.
Does the supplier have RM/child part/ incoming material testing facility
Does the End of Line testing is adequate to verify all the requirement of drawing in
entire working range.
Does the Testing facility is adequate to check 100% parts at EOL (not by sampling
inspection)
Does the vendor have Master samples for verifying the EOL tester.
Does the vendor have policy for retention of Test specimen over a period.
Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)
Does the vendor have defined list of minimum spares required for regular/
breakdown maintenance maintenance
Does the vendor is maintaining the inventory of spares as per minimum spares list
Does the vendor have defined targets for monitoring downtime of machine/
equipments
Auditors:
Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)
Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)
FY1516 Data
Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)
Supplier name
Items Confirmation items (■Important items) Scoring criteria Score Reamrks
Independent Quality Structure & direct reporting to
a Leadership of top Do you have a clear Orgnisation structure for Quality control Management : 2
■ 1 and its independent reporting ?
management Quality reporting to Production : 1
Quality Structure not available : 0
・Management of quality
target and plan Do you set up the annual quality targets ? Target Setting & Review : 2
・Management Review ■ 2 Do you prepare, monitor & follow up the action plan for Target Setting but no review :1
achievement of annual targets ? No target setting :0
Do you have the clear job description and authority of JD for all depts : 2
■ 4 management according to the department and hierarchy & Not defined : 0
DWM?
1 Management Responsibility
Authority and
b management points of Do QA manager has the authority the stop shipment & mass Defined in procedure : 2
■ 1 production
quality assurance incase defective parts are produced. Not defined : 0
manager
・The bounds of that
person's authority Do you understand and control the quality status at the Involvement by Gemba at shop floor : 2
・The method of grasping ■ 2 following phase? ・PP stage ・MPT stage ・Initial production Involvement by information : 1
the quality information control phase No Involvement : 0
・Implementation state of
the action according to
quality information
Do the QA head is informed about defects related to Involvement by Gemba at shop floor : 2
■ 3 ・In-process defect ・The customer claim ・The status of Involvement by information : 1
supplier quality defect condition No Involvement : 0
Supplier code
(Audit Score)
Achieved Score: 0
×100 = 0
Total Score: 237
Total 2
Part Number:
Subject: Vendor System Audit
Part Name:
Observation:-
Total
Achieved
○ △ × 1.Production
preparation
1 / 24 2.Regulation for initial
14.Critical parts Management production control
100
2 / 15
4 / 18
50
5 / 18
12.Products 4
6 / 15 management
7 / 21
0
8 / 21
11.Implementation
9 / 18 of standards
5
10 / 15
F003-3 10.Equipment/
QA/MT Ver.6.Qualit
5
Inspection
equipment's
11.Implementation
5
of standards
11 / 15
12 / 18 10.Equipment/ 6.Qualit
Inspection
13 / 12 equipment's
management©
14 / 9 9.5S management 7.Supplier control©
Total 8.Handling abnormality©
(MSIL 0 / 237 0 0 0
) in quality
Pre decided negative marking (if
Improvement Submission Date 8.10.16 Last Audit Rating
any)
Audit Date
Audit Person
n for initial
control
3.Changing management©
4.Standards
management
ontrol©