Sie sind auf Seite 1von 60

Company Name

Management information
Turnover (in Crores INR) Name MD Mobile No. Email
(FY15-16)
MSIL Business SOB Name Plant Head Mobile No. Email
No. of Manufacturing plants in India
Total No. of Tier-2 vendors
Others Major Customer
Company Type (Legal Status)
Country of Origin
ISO/TS certification agency, type and next
certfication renewal date.

Share Holding Detail Collaboration Detail


Name 1 % Holding Company 1 Name Type
Name 2 % Holding Company 2 Name Type
Name 3 % Holding Company 3 Name Type

Plant Detail :
Total Number
Vendor Code Location / Address Major Part Types Supplied
of OE Parts

YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT START OF SUPPLY

Minimum Qualification of Minimum number of Days Training to operator


Operators (nos.)
operators (ITI, Diploma, 10th etc) before putting him on the Production line
Total emplyoees Total Operators

Permanent Contractual PERMANENT CONTRACTUAL PERMANENT CONTRACTUAL

AVERAGE SALARY
WORKING DAYS / YEAR WORKING HOURS / DAY WEEKLY OFF DAY AVERAGE AGE OF WORKER CATEGORY EMPLOYEES (WORKERS)

UNION AFFILIATION DUE DATE FOR NEXT LABOUR AGREEMENT


TOTAL COVERED AREA SQ MTS ADDL AREA AVAILABLE FOR EXPANSION TOTAL AREA SQ MTS
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
1.  w Regarding
Production implementation rule of
preparation production preparation ①

Regarding management
2
/implementation by
production preparation ①
plan/report (master plan)

Defect prevention on the


3
stage of process design
by using FMEA/Matrix
diagram ①


MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
Product/process
4
evaluation at the quality

evaluation meeting in
each trial

2. Regulation for
Regulation for 1
initial production control
initial
production
control ①

2
Implementation of initial

production control
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

Part Name 2 Implementation of initial


production control
Category Audit Area Concerning regula

3. Definition and
Changing 1
implementation of
management changing management ①

Definition and control


2
method for initial part

MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

Definition and control


2
method for initial part

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula

4. Procedure to make
Standards 1
process control
management standards(QA process ①
charts)

4. Procedure to control
Standards 2
standards
management
・Process control ①
standards
・Inspection
specifications
・Operation instructions


MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
4. Procedure to control
Standards 2
standards
management
・Process control
standards
Supplier Name ・Inspection
specifications
・Operation instructions

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula

5. Education/ training
Education and 1
procedure
training

Education for ①
2
managers/Inspectors/
Special operators


MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
6.
Quality audit 1
Activity to keep/improve
and process production quality ①
verification

Content of process
2
review

7. 1 Evaluation method for


Supplier new suppliers ①
control
Management, quality
2
evaluation and
instruction for suppliers


MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
7.
Supplier
control
Management, quality
2
Supplier Name evaluation and
instruction for suppliers

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula

8. Handling when abnormal


Handling 1
situation occurs
abnormality in ①
quality


8.
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL
Handling
abnormality in
quality

Supplier Name

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
Prevention of recurrence
2
・Customer claims ①
・In process failure
・Suppliers failure


MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula
9. Location of production
5S 1
site
management ①

Production equipment's
2
management ①

10. Maintenance of
Equipment/Ins 1
equipment's , jigs and ①
pection tools
equipment's
management
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

10. Maintenance of
Part Name 1 equipment's , jigs and
Equipment/Ins
pection tools
Category
equipment's Audit Area Concerning regula
management

Maintenance of
2
inspection equipment's ①

11. Implementation of
Implementatio 1
standards
n of standards ①


Implementatio standards
n of standards
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

Part Name
Category Audit Area Concerning regula

12. management of parts


Products 1
flow ①
management

Non-confirming parts
2
management ①

13. 1 Bins/ Trolley Management


Handling
Management ①
MARUTI VENDOR QUAL

Supplier Name

13. 1 Bins/ Trolley Management


Handling
Part Name
Management
Category Audit Area Concerning regula

14. 1 Maru A Parts


Critical parts Management ①
Management


ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment


Do you have procedure for New Product development?
Have you defined Scope of parts & responsibility of each
department in procedure against every control item.

Have you defined New product development activities based upon


their criticality.
Do you have defined list of activities to be carried out for each
type of development (i.e New platform, major change, minor
change etc).

Do you make Timing plan for New product develpoment?


Do you review progress of activities as per timing plan and record
minutes of meeting for closure of actions?
DO you capture reason of delay in any activity as per plan?

Does your top management review New Product development


plan periodically?

Do you have system to review Past Defect History during New


Model development?

Do you Prepare FMEA (as per AIAG manual) and Update it


whenever any critical defect occur?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment


Do you record defects reported during various trial stages of New
product development and take countermeasure for such defects?

Do you define requirements for Line / Process Readiness before


SOP?
Do you check completion of all requirements before handing over
New Line to regular Production?

Do you have Procedure for Initial Flow Control?


Do you define following in Procedure -
1. Duration of IFC
2. Scope of IFC (New parts, ECN, Process change etc)
3. Targets
4. Termination condition for IFC
5. Responsibility to announce start and finish of IFC
6. Visual idebtification of IFC parts

Do you define critical characteristics which needs to be controlled


during IFC?
Do you increase frequency of inspection for critical
characteristics during IFC?

Do you have a system to share information related to start and


finish of IFC to all concern departments in orgnization?

Do you record issues observed during IFC and take


countermeasure to improve?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you calculate the process capability for critical charactistics


during IFC period and observe trend over a period of three
months?

Do you define clearly Planned & Un-planned changes related to


4M?

Do you have procedure for 4M change management?

Do you validate the Parts Quality whenever any 4M change occurs


and Keep records for traceability?

Do you proactively inspect parts produced before unplanned


change i.e. - Tool breakage - Machine breakdown - Pokeyoke
Failure, etc

Do you define clearly First production parts (FPP) - (parts


produced after ECN and PCN etc)?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you have system to control FPP parts and tags to identify


them?
(System for both Inprocess or Inhouse and BOP parts).

Do you have Control plan (PCS) and MIS-P for all part numbers
prodcued for MSIL?

Do you write both Product and Process characteristics on the


control plan?

Do you write following on control plan?


1. Inspection method
2. Reference standards and Regulations
3. Operation standards
4. Details of Limit samples, Run charts and Pokayoke.

Do you have procedure for document control? Which includes -


1. Responsiblilty of Preparation and approval
2. When to make, when to submit to customer
3. Revision criteria
4. Document retion period.

Do the information in Control plan (PCS), Inspection standards,


OPS and parameter charts etc matching.
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment


Do you prepare master list of documents and records revision
history of all documents.
Do you keep the records of issue of updated documents to
various departments.

Do you have procedure for training & make Annual training Plan
based on TNI?
Do you conduct Training as per annual plan and keep training
records.

Do you have procedure to evaluate skill of operators &


inspectors?
Have you defined Skill Evaluation method and frequency (for
operator & inspector skill evaluation.)

Do you Provide training to operators before SOP of New Model as


per OPS.
Do you provide training to all supervisers for role clarity and job
responsibility for their respective work area ?
For special processes (i.e Maru A, Critical , Final Inspection,
Rework) do you have special training plan for operators or
supervisors? Are records or training maintained?

For final inspectors and operators do you have system to verify


the current level of skills. (i.e Operator/ inspector Repeatability -
R&R)
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment


Do you have procedure for Internal audit which contains -
-list of certified auditors, audit frequency, audit timing, audit
method, audit checksheet; etc.
Do you onduct audit as per plan mention in procedure?
Do you take actions for closing the non confirmities found during
audit?

Do you have system for improving the process using operator


feedback such as kaizens etc.?

Do you conduct operator observance audit to check if operators


works as per WI or not?

Do you check the implementation & sustenance of past


countermeasures during shop floor audit?

Do you have procedure for new Supplier Selection and do you


implement this procedure?

Do you prepare supplier rating (For Tier-2 ) based upon Quality


performance? Do you Audit suppleirs and Guide them for
improvement?

Do you provide inspection standards and list of critical


characteristics to Suppliers during spec meeting.
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you monitor the Development plan of your suppliers during


the new Product development and work to improve on issues?

Do you inform suppliers to conduct Intial flow control (IFC) during


new product development and decide person resonsible for IFC.

Do you have system to check quality of parts which are directly


send to customer from outsourced suppliers (i.e after job work -
plating etc)?

Do you inform suppliers to follow 4M change management, FPP


for ECN/PCN and keep records for traceability.

Do you define abnormal situations clearly and Provide training to


operators about same?

Do you have Procedure for handling Customer complaints,


inhouse rejections and supplier complaints (BOP).

Do you have clear rule to define suspected lot & traceability of


suspected lots based upon abnormal situations?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you conduct root cause analysis of defects such as 5 why


analysis and take c/measure?

Do you review Control plan (PCS) and other standards after taking
countermeasures for defects.

Do you check the effectiveness of countermeasures by doing 3G


verification?

Do you horizontally deploy corrective action to similar parts and


processes?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you Store Raw material, BOP, WIP, Finished goods


appropriatly and prevent from dust, rust, scratch, deformation and
rainwater etc?

Have you defined Proper location & volume (i.e bin height) using
visual control for RM, BOP, WIP , Finished goods

Do you instruct operators not to store parts temporarily at work


place?

Do you carry out critical operation & inspection under controlled


environment as per requirement (i.e Light, temprature, humidity,
noise, vibration etc).

Do you Maintain production equipment's, jigs and tools properly?

Do you maintain inspection equipment's properly to ensure


accuracy?

Do you conduct preventive maintenance of Machines, tools, dies


& jigs as per Annual plan & Keep records?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you verify working of pokayoke, automations & alarms on


regular basis & keep records of same?

Have you defined the frequency for replacement and polishing for
consumables tools? (i.e Blades, electrodes, pins, rubstone etc.)

Do you calibrate inspection equipment's regularly and monitor


the expiry date?

Do you maintain the conditon of Limit samples for visual


inspections and validate them at certain frequency?

Do you have work instructions for operators which clearly explain


process and critical points.

Do you keep work instructions at a place where operators can see


it easily?

Do operators and supervisors operate according to the work


standards?

Do you check regularly whether operator is following the work


instructions or not?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Do the checksheets clearly explain the judgement criteria for each


point.

Do you maintain FIFO for RM, BOP, WIP and Finished parts etc.

Do you keep the lot wise traceability of products as per


-production date; -production volume; -shipping date

Do you control identification of similar parts separately?

Do you Identify NG and Hold parts clearly? Do you store them


separately?

Do you Procedure for -


1. Handling of NG and Hold parts?
2. Root cause analysis
3. Person responsible for final judgment
4. Feedback

Do you have reponsibility defined for repair of NG or Hold parts?


Are repair record kept? 

Do you make packing standards with customer for finished part


and pack them as per standards?
ARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLL
Vendor Attendees

Concerning regulation Judgment

Are the packaging style & storage environment sufficient to


control contamination

Do you have system for Bin and Trolley maintenance and


cleaning?

Does the Packaging method prevent Transportation damage?

Do you have any Special checks for Maru A parameters?

Do you have Identification of Maru A Processes & Operators on


Shop Floor.

Do you keep the repair history when repairing Maru A items

Achieved Score 0

Maximum Score 237

Audit Rating 0.00


M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
Date :

Auditors:

Remarks Follow Up
Additional ch
Supplier Name:

Part Name:

S.No Category Check points

HR Structure

Availability committee like Grievances redressal

Existence of Formal communication channels

Risk Mgmt: Communication between union/works committee


HR Risk Assessment and top management

Availability of laid down recruitment process


S.No Category Check points
Availability of laid down recruitment process

IR Related issues

Wage Settlement

D/E ratio

PAT/Sales

Cash Generation (PAT+Dep)


Capability to
invest for future
expansion
ROCE

Dividend Payout Ratio

Credit Rating

2
DSCR
(Debt Service Coverage Ratio (PBIT/Loan re-
payment including interest ))

Sales Turnover
S.No Category Check points

Group Turnover including Overseas plants

Scale

Footprint (Global/ Local)

Organisation structure

Total Investment in plant and machinery


S.No Category Check points

A) Management Focus & Prevention of Fire

B) Fire Detection & Quick Suppression


Top Mgmt Focus
3 on safety and
quality

A)     Emergency Preparedness to Address Major Fire

4 Safety regulation adhereance and controls

Environment

Adequate
Manufacturing
capability

Facility
S.No Adequate
Category Check points
Manufacturing
capability

Facility

For design and product validation

For regular production

Inprocess Inspection
Adequate testing
Facility

RM/ incoming material testing

End of Line testing


S.No Category Check points

6 Maintenance Planned/ breakdown maintenance


facility
Additional checklist ( Dt : ………………………….)
Vendor Attendees:

Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)

HR structure is manned by a Junior resource / headed by non HR person


focusing only on administration - 0

HR Structure available and is headed by a qualified HR resource mark - 1

HR Structure with documented HR policy in Place - 2

No Grievance Redressal Process - 0

Grievance Process available but no awareness among employeesare - 1

Grievance Redressal process is there & its awareess with documentary


evidence - 2

No town halls. Mostly communication is through line managers and


information is received through hearsay - 0

Unstructured Communication without senior mangement's participation - 1

Defined communication plan with active participation of senior management. -


2

Person dependent/ Informal communication process - 0

No structured Communication with Union/Works Committee - 1

Structured communication process - 2

Recruitment is adhoc and mostly reactive. No background verification &


induction process. - 0

Some degree of Induction process but unstructured - 1


Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)

Structured process with defined background verification process - 2

IR Issues with more than one day production loss - 0

IR issues with less than one day production loss - 1

No IR Issues and production loss - 2

Delay in Wage settlement for more than 1 yrs - 0

Delay in Wage settlement between 6 months to 1 yrs - 1

Wage settlement done within 6 months - 2

if
D/E <1 then 2 Marks
1<D/E<2 then 1 Marks
D/E>2 then 0 Marks
if
PAT>5% then 2 Mark
2%<PAT<5% then 1 Mark
PAT<2% then 0 Mark

if
Cash / Net sales>8% then 2 Mark
5%<Cash / Net sales<8% then 1 Mark
Cash / Net sales <5% then 0 Mark

if
ROCE >= 10 then 2 Marks
5<ROCE<10 1 Marks
ROCE<5 0 Marks

< 30% - 2 marks


30%-60% - 1 mark
>60% 0 marks
if A Category -2 marks
if B Category -1 marks
if C Category -0 marks

If DSCR>1.2 then 2 mark


1.1<DCSR<1.2 then 1 mark
If DSCR<1.1 then 0 mark

0<50 Crs - 0 marks


50~100 crs -1
100~500 crs - 2
500~1000 crs - 3
>1000 crs - 4 marks
Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)

<100 Crs - 0 marks


100~500 crs -1
500~1000 crs - 2
1000~5000 crs - 3
>5000 crs - 4 marks

Local- Single Plant : Local Multiple plants(Including Group) : Global

If available for QA/Production/Maintenace/HR/Admin then 2 marks


If Available for any two functions then 1
if not available then 0

More than 100 Cr - 2 marks


Upto Rs 100 Cr - 1 marks
upto Rs 25 Cr - 0 marks
Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)

Is Fire Safety Organization structure / fire volunteer list available within the
company with clear responsibility?(As per State Factory Rule)
Has the Fire Safety Risk assessment been carried out & mitigation of risk being
done?
(As per State Factory Rule)
Is Top Management committed towards Fire Prevention & Quick response and
addressing through regular communication & reviews (MIS)?
Is Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm/water sprinkler system provided for
office/building area & integrated with fire/emergency control room?
Is appropriate Fire detection and suppression system provided in fire prone area
like (server room, paint shop, paint & thinner store, gasoline storage, diesel & other
storage)
Is Fire Extinguishers operation trained persons/security team available in each
shift (24X7)?
(As per State Factory Rule)
a) Is enough number of Fire Hydrant Points available
b) Is Fire Pump house adequate & maintained in good condition (Condition of
Jockey Pump/DG availability for power failure) ?
c) Is Hydrant Water is charged at
7 Kg/Cm2 Pressure?
(As per National Building Code/State Factory Rule)
Is Onsite Emergency Plan available & responsible persons are fully aware about
their responsibility?
(State Factory Rule/ Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals
Rule)
Is the fire/security team familiar with the premises and any particular special
hazards relating to the premises or the activities within it?
As per safety assessment checksheet.

safe working environment (use of PPE, safety organization, layout)

shop floor working condition (Basic 5S,lighting,ventilation, dust level, noise/air


pollution, working temp)

layout of mfg process (optimize material flow)

Right type of production Equipment - Technology Selection and continual


upgradation

Condition of Machine/ Equipment.

Recording of process parameters is being done or not as per PCS


Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)

Is vendor assessing the process capability and making efforts to improve it

What is operation efficiency of the plant/ Equipment.

Does the vendor have awareness/ emphasis on Low cost automation , Pika Pika,
pickup sensor , operation interlocking etc.

Is vendor working 24 X 7 basis (except standard requirement like furnace for 24*7
and injection molding for 24*6 etc.)

Risk mitigation - Does the vendor have any backup plan available for
Manufacturing in case of exigency.

Does the supplier have all Testing Equipment's/Rigs required as per drawing
requirements
or
It is outsourced to accredited external agency/Collaborator
Does the supplier have all inspection instruments required as per drawing
requirements
or
It is Outsourced from accredited external agency/Collaborator support

Does the supplier have adequate testing facility for inprocess inspection as per
control plan

Test Facility is adequate interim of volume of work.


Only sampling check is possible or complete as per requirement.
Are gauges or equipment's are of standard make

Are the inspection results directly stored by instrument/ equipment or fed in


online system for analysis.

Online auto segregation of NG part is available or not after testing. i.e. Poka yoke
for NG part with counter or Interlocking of Pokayoke with next cycle.
Does the least count/ working range of Inprocess test facility is inline with
product requirement.
After Testing, does the judgement is subjective or objective.

Does the supplier have RM/child part/ incoming material testing facility

Does the End of Line testing is adequate to verify all the requirement of drawing in
entire working range.
Does the Testing facility is adequate to check 100% parts at EOL (not by sampling
inspection)
Does the vendor have Master samples for verifying the EOL tester.

Does the vendor have policy for retention of Test specimen over a period.
Score
Evaluation Criteria (self assesment)

Does the vendor have defined list of minimum spares required for regular/
breakdown maintenance maintenance
Does the vendor is maintaining the inventory of spares as per minimum spares list

Does the vendor have defined targets for monitoring downtime of machine/
equipments

Does the vendor have maintenance capability in-house or maintenance is


outsourced

Does the vendor have required equipment/ facility for maintenance


Date :

Auditors:

Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)
Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)

FY1516 Data
Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)

For FY 1516 or latest

FY1516 Gross Block / Net Block


Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)

if compliant then 1 marks


else 0 mark.

if compliant then 1 marks


else 0 mark.
if compliant then 1 marks
else 0 mark.
if compliant then 1 marks
else 0 mark.
if compliant then 1 marks
else 0 mark.

if compliant then 1 marks


else 0 mark.

if compliant then 1 marks


else 0 mark.

if compliant then 1 marks


else 0 mark.

if compliant then 1 marks


else 0 mark.
if compliant then 1 marks
else 0 mark.
If PPE and OHSAS certificate - 2
if any of above is missing - 1
if both not available -0
Judgement based
Very good -2
Normal -1
Poor - 0
Layout considering RM receipt to Dispatch is
uniform - 2
Partial/ Some process in batch and final
assembly is uniform - 1
complete Zigzag - 0
If Production equipment is as per required
specification - 2
if not - 0
Old Machine available and no efforts/
initiatives to improve it -0
Machine upgraded continuously with use of
PLC/ CNC controls - 2
If Done - 2
If not - 0
Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)

No system of Process capability assessment -


0
Process capability is monitored but no action
plan for improvement -1
Process capability is monitored and actions
taken for improvement -2
>85% - 2
<85% -1
<75% -0
Very good -2
Normal -1
Poor - 0
if 24X7 - then 0
If 24 X 6 the 1
Otherwise 2
If Multiple plants - 2
If backup available - 1
If no backup available - 0

if in-house available then 2 marks


if from accredited lab or collaborator then 1
if none of above then 0

if in-house available then 2 marks

if none of above then 0

if available at required station then 2 marks


If being managed then 1
if none of above then 0

if in-house available then 2 marks


if none of above then 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
if available then 2 marks
If manual recording 1 marks
if recording not available than 0
if auto available then 2 marks
If done manually 1 marks
if not available than 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
If subjective than 0
if objective than 2
if available or verify from accredited lab then 2
marks
if not available than 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
Values/Observations Remarks
(Self assessment)

if available then 2 marks


if not available than 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
If Downtime monitored and improvement
activity is done -2
If only monitoring -1
if no monitoring -0
if in-house available then 2 marks
if outsourced to Specialized agency/ maker/
AMC -1
if none of above then 0
if available then 2 marks
if not available than 0
「チェックシート」 56/60.

Supplier Audit Report (B) appendix table

Supplier name
Items Confirmation items (■Important items) Scoring criteria Score Reamrks
Independent Quality Structure & direct reporting to
a Leadership of top Do you have a clear Orgnisation structure for Quality control Management : 2
■ 1 and its independent reporting ?
management Quality reporting to Production : 1
Quality Structure not available : 0

・Management of quality
target and plan Do you set up the annual quality targets ? Target Setting & Review : 2
・Management Review ■ 2 Do you prepare, monitor & follow up the action plan for Target Setting but no review :1
achievement of annual targets ? No target setting :0

continouos review with Closure evidences : 2


■ 3 How frequently Quality performance indicators reviewed by continouos review without Closure evidences : 1
Top management ? no review : 0

Do you have the clear job description and authority of JD for all depts : 2
■ 4 management according to the department and hierarchy & Not defined : 0
DWM?
1 Management Responsibility

Top management audit monthly / quarterly: 2


■ 5 How frequently Top management is auditing the shopfloor? Top managament audit in six month : 1
Top Management audit more than six month : 0

Authority and
b management points of Do QA manager has the authority the stop shipment & mass Defined in procedure : 2
■ 1 production
quality assurance incase defective parts are produced. Not defined : 0
manager
・The bounds of that
person's authority Do you understand and control the quality status at the Involvement by Gemba at shop floor : 2
・The method of grasping ■ 2 following phase? ・PP stage ・MPT stage ・Initial production Involvement by information : 1
the quality information control phase No Involvement : 0
・Implementation state of
the action according to
quality information
Do the QA head is informed about defects related to Involvement by Gemba at shop floor : 2
■ 3 ・In-process defect ・The customer claim ・The status of Involvement by information : 1
supplier quality defect condition No Involvement : 0

Do you review & approve ? Action plan verification by QA head : 2


■ 4 ・The corrective action for critical problem of quality No Involvement : 0

Involvement by Gemba at shop floor : 2


■ 5 Do you verify the countermeasures of past defects to avoid Involvement by information : 1
repeated defects (sustenance of countermeasures)? No Involvement : 0
MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED
Issue Deptt. QAPG Prepared
 Vendor Quality System Audit Report
Date of Issue
Copy to Supplier name
QAPQ 1
Supplier Attendant Name
Vendor 1

Supplier code
(Audit Score)

Achieved Score: 0
×100 = 0
Total Score: 237

Total 2

Part Number:
Subject: Vendor System Audit
Part Name:

Observation:-

Total
Achieved
○ △ × 1.Production
preparation
1 / 24 2.Regulation for initial
14.Critical parts Management production control
100
2 / 15

3 / 18 13.Handling Management 3.Changi

4 / 18
50
5 / 18
12.Products 4
6 / 15 management
7 / 21
0
8 / 21
11.Implementation
9 / 18 of standards
5

10 / 15

F003-3 10.Equipment/
QA/MT Ver.6.Qualit
5
Inspection
equipment's
11.Implementation
5
of standards

11 / 15

12 / 18 10.Equipment/ 6.Qualit
Inspection
13 / 12 equipment's
management©
14 / 9 9.5S management 7.Supplier control©
Total 8.Handling abnormality©
(MSIL 0 / 237 0 0 0
) in quality
Pre decided negative marking (if
Improvement Submission Date  8.10.16 Last Audit Rating
any)

F003-3 QA/MT Ver. 5


Verified Approved

Audit Date

Audit Person

n for initial
control

3.Changing management©

4.Standards
management

5.Education and training©

F003-3audit and process verification


6.Quality QA/MT Ver. 5
5.Education and training©

6.Quality audit and process verification

ontrol©

F003-3 QA/MT Ver. 5

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen