LAB

HR ANALYTICS
LAB DIGITAL ASSIGNMENT I

SUBMITTED TO
Dr.G.N. SUMATHI

BY
A.P.SRINIVASAN
18MBA0062
 CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF GIVEN DATA

Correlation Matrix: output from SPSS

Correlations
IPR_TOTAL TC_TOTAL MT_TOTAL EMP_TOTAL
** **
Pearson Correlation 1 .425 .497 .631**
IPR_TOTAL Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 150 150 150 150
** **
Pearson Correlation .425 1 .695 .663**
TC_TOTAL Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 150 150 150 150
** **
Pearson Correlation .497 .695 1 .726**
MT_TOTAL Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 150 150 150 150
Pearson Correlation .631** .663** .726** 1
EMP_TOTAL Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 150 150 150 150
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Note:
i. The correlation is classified into 2 categories i.e.

-1 to 0 which is negative correlation and 0 to +1 which is positive correlation.

ii. And 0 to 0.4 is considered to be weak correlation, 0.4 to 0.7 which is considered to be
moderate correlation and 0.7 to 1.0 is considered as strong correlation.
iii. Level of confidence : 99%

Interpretation:
a. Range:
The Analysis table shows that there is no negative correlation, hence the independent variables are
accepted (significant for the study )and identify its relationship and effect on other corresponding
variables.
The correlation of variables is all significant as the confidence level is at 100% or the significance is
0.000 for the variables.
The Motivation and Commitment and EMP are the variables which have high impact on their
relationship which is reported at 0.726, whereas the least impact relationship is between variables are
IPR and TC reported at 0.425.
 b. Value:
Weak 0 to 0.4 Moderate 0.4 to 0.7 Strong 0.7 to 1
Correlation Correlation Correlation
- - IPR and TC 0.425 MT and EMP 0.726
- - IPR and MT 0.497 - -
- - IPR and EMP 0.631 - -
- - TC and EMP 0.663 - -
* - TC and MT 0.695 - -

REGRESSION ANALYSIS

a. Results

Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Square Estimate
a
1 .811 .658 .651 1.727
a. Predictors: (Constant), mt_total, ipr_total, tc_total

From the model summary table, the ADJ R square value is 0.651 which states that the
mentioned independent variables cover the 65.1% of the EMP influencing factors.

ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 836.554 3 278.851 93.523 .000b
1 Residual 435.319 146 2.982
Total 1271.873 149
a. Dependent Variable: emp_total
b. Predictors: (Constant), mt_total, ipr_total, tc_total

Model significance:
As from the Anova table, the significance value is at 0.000. Hence the model is proved to be
significant
 Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) -.492 1.229 -.401 .689
ipr_total .359 .061 .332 5.893 .000
1
tc_total .255 .068 .255 3.761 .000
mt_total .469 .086 .384 5.422 .000
a. Dependent Variable: emp_total

More contributing IV
MT is the more contributing independent variable to EMP reported at 0.384.

.Independent Variable significance value:

The independent variables are IPR, MT, TC and all their significant value are 0.000.
Hence the variables as significant relationship with Dependent variable i.e. Employee
Performance.

Insights to the company:

The analysis shows that the variables all are significant at the confidence level of 100%. And
have relationship among each other with difference in their impact. Such that MT as the most
impact on the EMP and as well as other variables that are IPR and TC do have their impact
but not strong as MT. In overall the all the independent variables contribute 65% as the
influencing factor of dependent variable i.e. EMP. Hence the organization must concentrate
in improving the employee performance through effective implementation and planning of
Interpersonal Relation, Motivation and Commitment and Team Cohesiveness