Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Nasuha
Universitas Islam Malang, Malang
nasuha.nour@gmail.com
Abstract: The issue of character building on Teaching English for Young Learners (TEYL) has been
pervasive in English language teaching (ELT) practices. Research in this field has also been carried out for
years. Various ways to integrate character building have emerged and been employed by teachers around
the world since reinforcement on building young learners’ characters needs to be inculcated in teaching
process. As it is a good start to empower young learners not only through knowledge about language but
also through introducing positive characters, the current issues about how teachers implement character
building in English Language Teaching are worth to be discussed. Making the most of opportunities to
instil certain values of religiosity, nationalism, independence, cooperativeness, and others while teaching
English to young learners is a vital process that teachers should pay attention to. Therefore, this present
paper attempts to describe considerations of implementing character building as a closer look for EYL
teachers in teaching practices based on Indonesian national education goal. In this paper, furthermore,
the ways of how teachers promote character building for young learners are also depicted and
elucidated. The characters which are discussed in this paper focuses on Indonesian contexts.
Keywords: English language teaching, English for young learners, character building.
INTRODUCTION
Character building has been emerging to be one of the most current issues discussed in English
Language Teaching field especially in Teaching English for Young Learners (TEYL). A cornerstone of the issue
is that the inculcation of character building which is considered to be the most effective in early ages. It is
believed that whatever the children be in the future has a significant link with the characters imbeded in
them (Agboola & Tsai, 2012). Characters and values are not innate to young learners; however, they must be
taught, learned and honed through practice and a conducive environment (Shancez, 2000). Due to that
reason, it is very essential to reinforce good characters through practical ways in teaching learning process.
Hence, it is a responsibity for teachers to integrate character building into the teaching of English to Young
learners.
The implementation of character building plays a pivotal role in teaching young learners and the
main actors for this big responsibility are teachers whose duty is not only teaching but also educating. It is
the best way for teachers to help their students not only in developing their academic skills but also
developing their noble characters since children are ‘active learners and thinkers’ (Cameron, 2001). Good
character can assist young learners to adjust their behaviours, so they can be great and educated citizen in
the future. Good character starts from knowing a good thing, wanting a good thing, and something good
(Lickona, 2003). To actualize the reinforcement of good characters, teachers are required to choose learning
activities, materials, and methods which deal with the noble values insertion in teaching and learning
process. As a result, young learners can manifest those valuable characters in their way of thinking, habits
and actions.
The integration of character building into EYL classroom apparently brings some advantages for
learners of the early ages. It helps young learners learn to think before they act, to understand fundamental
differences between right and wrong, and to make good decisions. Furthermore, Ryan (1999) explained that
teaching and learning process emphasizing character development can help to improve students’ academic
Proceedings | International Seminar on English Language Teaching and Research (ELTAR) 2017
achievement and communication skills thus encouraging a tougher sense of indepence and self-confidence.
Some researchers argued that young learners possess a fascinating potency in learning new languages.
However, without putting their linguistic competence aside, it is a vital need to reinforce some noble
characters by ways of accommodating through lesson, instilling through learning activity, delivering through
teaching methods used, and planting or practicing through everyday life. This notion is also suggested by
Berkowitz & Bier (2004) that the central goal of such an education is the development of what can also be
understood as ‘sociomoral competency’.
The education stakeholders especially teachers should not disregard character building; however,
they ‘must find ways to infuse the curriculum with character building’ (McElmeel, 2002). Nevertheless,
character building might be one thing that tends to be absent in language teaching. The assumption is based
on the reality that education today emphasizes more on teaching materials (Creswell, 2008). Therefore, it
implies that teachers need to improve their knowledge about how to build characters of young learners. The
five core values of Indonesian context which include ‘religious, nationalist, independent, cooperative and
integrious’ are worth to be strengthened. Classroom habituation and language learning activities are
integrated to imbed noble values and good characters to young learners in their English classroom.
Accordingly, young learners are expected to improve their academics, emotional and cognitive
developments and social interactions. It is in line with Indonesian national education goal which states “To
develop the potential of learners to become human beings who has strong faith and believe in one God,
have noble character, healthy, knowledgeable, capable, creative, independent, and become democratic and
responsible citizens”.
There has been some practical evidence connecting character building to the teaching of English for
young learners either in global and local context. One of the evidence is a study done by Maulidya and
Santihastuti (2011) reporting the integration of character building content in kindergarten English teaching
through the theme “The environment”. It explored the use of songs, games, stories, and other activities as
ways of building young learners’ character through routines and habit formation. The manifestation of
character building mentioned in the study is in line with philosophy of character education of Indonesia
stated by Ki Hajar Dewantara which includes four pillars; literation, estetic, ethics, and kinesthetic. Frankly
speaking, the insertion of character building is of necessary because language teaching requires more than
the teaching of language (Albantani & Madkur, 2016). In this sense, it transfers and reaches beyond a
particular language being learnt.
The empirical studies discussed above imply that character building on English for Young Learners
(EYL) has already been incorporated in instructional practices from time to time. Thus, the issue of character
building implementation in EYL classroom need to be highlighted. As the main holder of character building,
teachers need to be provided with ample references which emphasize the urgency of constructing young
learners’ characters which are basically different from adults and also manners in which teachers can help
learners to develop their own characters, especially when learning English. Therefore, this paper is worth to
be presented since it explores two essential points: (1) The reasons why character building should be
integrated into TEYL; (2) The ways to integrate characters such as ‘religious, nationalist, independent,
cooperative and integrity’ focusing on Indonesian context into TEYL. Those points will be elaborated as
closer look for EYL teachers to teach and educate students based the goal of Indonesian national education .
are by employing the integration of character into subject matter, optimization of local content and
classroom management. While the second type, school culture-based, can be manifested through
habituation of values in schools’ activity, exemplary educator, school ecosystem, and norms, rules and
school tradition. The last type is community-based which means involvements of parents, school
committees, education activist and so forth.
philosophical perspective that virtues can be taught and learned through the proper pedagogy. All in all,
teaching English is an opportunity to imbeded fundamental values to young learners rather than only
introducing new language.
METHOD
A library research under descriptive-qualitative approach was employed in this recent study.
Descriptive-qualitative is defined as a research design discovering the who, what, and where of events or
experiences and on gaining insights from informants regarding a poorly understood phenomenon. Through
the spirit of this design, this study attempts to describe the closer look of integrating character building in
teaching English for young learners which focuses on reasons and ways based on plethora of references. The
study was focused on reviewing literatures and previous empirical studies.
FINDINGS
The Integration of Character Building Which Focuses on Indonesian Context into TEYL
The initial goal of character building is to exemplify good character characteristics for students
(Skaggs & Bodenhorn, 2006). It should not be taken lightly because it would have foundational and
everlasting effects on the young learners of the future in displaying their character. When good traits are
gradually imbeded to young learners, teachers should think how their good trait can affect the lesson learnt.
Therefore, the promising hope of implementing character building is to make critical links between the
lessons in the classroom and benevolent action in life. Good values or characters being build and English
lesson being taught become two inseparable things since characters and language have to be integrated.
should be relevant to students’ life and also challenge them intellectually, emotionally, and socially; (3)
administration should support and give enough space for teachers to exercise flexible pedagogy in specific
character traits; (4) conducting class discussions could effectively engage students in the program. Further,
through the reflection, it will lead to the opportunities of in-depth discussion; (5) finally; the responsibility of
the school is to develop an environment in which reinforces bright sides of students learning and behavior,
thereby students practice those good values they learned from the character education program.
Pre Activity
In this stage, the pre activities are commonly praying together, greeting the teacher, warming-up
activities or some other kinds of activities to begin the lesson. Young learners are encouraged to developed
religiosity and courtesy, for example. These two values are inherent in praying activities before lesson is
started, so teachers encourage young learners to possess religious characters. The teaching of building
characters can also be reinforced through childrens’ routines in order that they are accostumed to behave
well. It was confirmed by a study carried out by Qoyyimah (2016) in Indonesian state schools in which the
value of religiosity was strongly infused through the religious ritual activities promoted by the school
community and through routine activities in their EFL classes.
Main Activity
For the main activity, it usually focuses on language skills activities. When teachers give team-work
activities as their instructions, the value of cooperativeness is inherent in team-work activities inherent.
When teachers give individual activity such as drawing or matching as the main instruction, the value of
independence were strengthened through those activities.
Proceedings | International Seminar on English Language Teaching and Research (ELTAR) 2017
Post Activity
The post activity is when lesson almost comes to the end, so they are kinds of giving homework to
young learners, asking about learners’ impression about the material, and the last is praying together. The
teachers can also tell directly to young learners that they have to be diligent and responsible in doing
homework. It means that the values of ‘diligence’ and ‘responsibility’ in this sense are taught directly.
Although the activities might not be exactly the same as what have been mentioned above. It is
important to note that it depends on teachers’ decision and creativity to match learning activities and
character values since Shin (2012) argued that creativity is the key when teaching English for children, both
in English as foreign language or EFL context and English as a second language or ESL
Conclusion
Character building is a very essential element which is inseparable with English Language Teaching,
especially in Teaching English for Young Learners. Pertaining the fact that young learners are children who
are in the golden age, it is the best time for them to be instilled with good moral values. They need to be
gradually introduced with noble values and characters, and also need to be accustomed to keeping good
traits. Therefore, character building plays an important role in teaching EYL. However, it can not be
implemented in very short time and also can not provide direct results. It is a gradual process which needs
endless support from education stakeholders, especially teachers. Regarding with its advantages, it brings
positive impacts for students in academic, social interactions and emotions. Therefore, the integration of
character building in the teaching and learning process should not be taken for granted. To implement
character building in young learners’ classroom, teachers has many options to determine the ways they
should incorporate it with learning activities. In addition, for reinforcing character building, teachers also can
utilize learning media and supplementary materials. In a nutshell, character building is a vital component of
Teaching English for Young Learners (TEYL).
Suggestions
It is suggested for future researchers to explore more ways of integration of character building since in this
present study, the researcher decided to review only some literatures which is closest to the topic being
discussed due to time constraints. There area still many insightful references to be explored in order to give
the readers more informations about whys and hows of integration character building in Teaching English for
Young Learners (TEYL). Since this present study is non research-based, it is suggested for next researchers to
put this conceptual research into practices.
REFERENCES
Agboola, A., & Tsai, K. C. (2012). Bring character education into classroom. European Journal of Educational
Research, 1, 163-170. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.1.2.163.
Albantani, A. M., & Madkur, A. (2016). Integrating character education values in language teaching: Why and
how? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309556734.
Almerico, G. M. (2014). Building character through literacy with children’s literature. Research in Higher
Education Journal, 26, 1-10. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1055322.pdf
Berkowitz, M. W., & Hoppe, M. A. (2009). Character education and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 20,
131-142, doi: 10.1080/13598130903358493.
Proceedings | International Seminar on English Language Teaching and Research (ELTAR) 2017
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching language to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooley, A. (2008). Legislating character: Moral education in North Carolina’s public schools. Educational
Studies, 43 (3), 188-205. doi:10.1080/00131940802117563.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and
qualitative research. 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Edgington, W. D (2002). To promote character education, use literature for children and adolescents. The
Social Studies, 93, 113-116, doi:10.1080/0037799029599893
Irwansyah, D. (2013). Integrating local context to teaching English for young learners (EYL). Rumah Jurnal
IAIN Metro, 1, 69-77.
Lickona, T., Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (2003). CEP’s eleven principles of effective character education,
Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership. Retrieved from
http://www.character.org/uploads/PDFs/Eleven_Principles.pdf
Maulidyah, H. & Santihastuti, A. (2011). Integrating character building content in kindergarten English
teaching. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/4726537
McElmeel, S. L. (2002). Character education: A book guide of teachers, librarians, and parents. Greenwood
Village, CO: Teacher Ideas Press.
Milliren, A., & Messer, M. H. (2009). Invitations to character. Journal of Invitational Theory & Practice, 15, 19-
31.
Paul, D. (2003). Teaching English to children in Asia. Hongkong: Longman Asia ELT
Qoyyimah, U. (2016). Inculcating character education through EFL teaching in Indonesian state schools,
Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11, 109-126. doi: 10.1080/1554480X.2016.1165618
Romanowski, M. H. (2005). Through the eyes of teachers: High school teachers' experiences with character
education. American Secondary Education, 34 (1), 6-23
Rukiyati, et. al. (2014). Value inculcation for early chilhood through traditional Javanese songs. Retrieved
from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/penelitian/dr-rukiyati-mhum/b19-value-inculcation-
early-chilhood-through-traditional-javanese-songs-2014.pdf
Ryan, K., & Bohlin, K. (1999). Building character in schools: Practical ways to bring moral
instruction to life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.